Re: The Brive, CFB, and FTP Shitposting Thread (Yawn...)
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
https://slymepit.com/phpbb/
A common refrain seems to be that men should be more active in checking bad behavior. That is highly debatable. I think it would be best to defer to Paglia on this one; the onus shouldn't be on men to police bad behavior. Isn't that just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Patriarchy)? Women should return to the norm of standing up for themselves and being assertive. I have a feeling the majority of women have no problem with male sexual aggressiveness. I know for a fact that a lot of women love being catcalled. But if they have a problem with it, it's their duty to do something about it.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I like the kid, I really do, but I knew exactly where Matthew Facciani would go with this one:
Nuance Is Often Lost In The Discussion Of Toxic Masculinity
Now, he will earnestly try to take an even-handed approach to my comments, but watch the hordelings show up & go apeshit.
Policing behavior among your friends, acquaintances, & colleagues, as Facciani & others suggest, would inevitably lead to the sort of repressive conformity dystopia China now has. And as you note, doing it to some stranger dude is highly likely to get you fucked up bad. Facciani is about as unswole as they come; for his own safety I hope he doesn't try to 'Gillette' some bikers or ese's.Hunt wrote: ↑ A common refrain seems to be that men should be more active in checking bad behavior. That is highly debatable. I think it would be best to defer to Paglia on this one; the onus shouldn't be on men to police bad behavior. Isn't that just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Patriarchy)? Women should return to the norm of standing up for themselves and being assertive. I have a feeling the majority of women have no problem with male sexual aggressiveness. I know for a fact that a lot of women love being catcalled. But if they have a problem with it, it's their duty to do something about it.
Plus, and this is a significant point, most feminists don't understand that white knighting, particularly if you don't know the offending party, is rather dangerous for men. Chances are you're going to get into a fight, or in the wrong circumstance, a bullet through the heart. Women are actually in a much better position to shut an unwanted advance down than a male stranger. Of course, there are limits. As for intervening in a violent attack, ideally a man should do whatever his capabilities/courage allows.
But for mundane situations where a horny man approaches a women, you'd have to have a screw loose to think its your business.
Over the years I have come across the following laws:Hunt wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:47 pmA common refrain seems to be that men should be more active in checking bad behavior. That is highly debatable. I think it would be best to defer to Paglia on this one; the onus shouldn't be on men to police bad behavior. Isn't that just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Patriarchy)? Women should return to the norm of standing up for themselves and being assertive. I have a feeling the majority of women have no problem with male sexual aggressiveness. I know for a fact that a lot of women love being catcalled. But if they have a problem with it, it's their duty to do something about it.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I like the kid, I really do, but I knew exactly where Matthew Facciani would go with this one:
Nuance Is Often Lost In The Discussion Of Toxic Masculinity
Now, he will earnestly try to take an even-handed approach to my comments, but watch the hordelings show up & go apeshit.
Plus, and this is a significant point, most feminists don't understand that white knighting, particularly if you don't know the offending party, is rather dangerous for men. Chances are you're going to get into a fight, or in the wrong circumstance, a bullet through the heart. Women are actually in a much better position to shut an unwanted advance down than a male stranger. Of course, there are limits. As for intervening in a violent attack, ideally a man should do whatever his capabilities/courage allows.
But for mundane situations where a horny man approaches a women, you'd have to have a screw loose to think its your business.
A long time ago I was in a relationship with a woman that really had a bad time dealing with unwanted advances. She really seemed to hate it but didn't seem able to be direct and tell them to knock it off. Likewise she would get pissed at me when I told them to back off because presumably she didn't want me to behave as if I owned her, in spite of the fact we were cohabiting and in an exclusive relationship. She would have a shitfit when other women flirted with me or if I showed interest in other women but I was an asshole if told them (harassers) to fuck off.Policing behavior among your friends, acquaintances, & colleagues, as Facciani & others suggest, would inevitably lead to the sort of repressive conformity dystopia China now has. And as you note, doing it to some stranger dude is highly likely to get you fucked up bad. Facciani is about as unswole as they come; for his own safety I hope he doesn't try to 'Gillette' some bikers or ese's.
"Never stick your dick in crazy" springs to mind...
We can hope that Matt's sense of survival will kick in before he kicks in the doors of the local Hell's Angels clubhouse and demands they stop trafficking strippers and hookers and other offenses against women. I'm in if we need an intervention. :drool:Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Guys, seriously share those experiences over at Facciani's. I'm honestly afraid the little dude will get jacked some day.
England whiteknighted Poland in 1939 despite Hitler getting screwed as a consequence of whiteknighting the Sudetens.Hunt wrote: ↑ If you're some stranger and don't know what you're dealing with, white knighting is so dangerous that I'd go so far as to say it's irresponsible to urge men to do it willy nilly. If the situation is violent, call the cops; that's what they're (supposed to be) trained for. I've WKed precisely once in my life, and that was when a guy was slapping around his wife/gf at a camp site. I was lucky to make it out unscathed. BTW, after I did it, I immediately got in my car and drove to another camping ground 80 miles away.
If anything England and France didn't act tough enough. I'm sure there were some reasons not to invade Germany while the Wehrmacht was busy in Poland, but in the long run that definitely backfired.Brive1987 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:23 pmEngland whiteknighted Poland in 1939 despite Hitler getting screwed as a consequence of whiteknighting the Sudetens.Hunt wrote: ↑ If you're some stranger and don't know what you're dealing with, white knighting is so dangerous that I'd go so far as to say it's irresponsible to urge men to do it willy nilly. If the situation is violent, call the cops; that's what they're (supposed to be) trained for. I've WKed precisely once in my life, and that was when a guy was slapping around his wife/gf at a camp site. I was lucky to make it out unscathed. BTW, after I did it, I immediately got in my car and drove to another camping ground 80 miles away.
Which, strangely enough, is the usual objective ....
A Google executive sparked a fierce backlash from employees by using the word “family” in a weekly, company-wide presentation, according to internal documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Many Google employees became angry that the term was used while discussing a product aimed at children, because it implied that families have children, the documents show. The backlash grew large enough that a Google vice president addressed the controversy and solicited feedback on how the company could become more inclusive.
There had been years of appeasement and de militarisation within the two countries (esp Britain) much to the consternation of people like Churchill who had warned against it for a long time. Plus Britain has never had a large standing army and men needed recruiting/drafting and training, this takes time, troops from the dominions needed mobilising, again this takes time. Also after the debacle of the great war France and Britain fully expected the Germans to come through Belgium again so the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) mobilised there to stop the perceived German advance. No one (Rather foolishly in hindsight) foresaw the Germans pushing through the Ardennes forest and cutting the allied forces in two and forcing the BEF into a hasty and humiliating retreat to Dunkirk.Kirbmarc wrote: ↑ By the way, why exactly did England and France not attack Germany during the invasion of Poland, or in the next months? Was it more of a logistics problem, since Germany won too quickly and they couldn't mobilize fast enough, or was it a strategic choice, or even a political/diplomatic move?
I got a bit of a pocket battleship after seeing those Gillette babes' arses! Wouldn't mind back-scuttling them!shoutinghorse wrote: ↑
The early period of WW2 was known in Britain as "The Phoney War" as not much action appeared to be taking place and life had continued almost as normal, however there had been some Naval activity like the forced scuttling of the German pocket battleship 'Graf Spee' at the Battle Of The River Plate in Dec 1939. An early moral booster for Britain.
You take the back, I'll take the front and we can arm-wrestle on her shoulders.Lsuoma wrote: ↑I got a bit of a pocket battleship after seeing those Gillette babes' arses! Wouldn't mind back-scuttling them!shoutinghorse wrote: ↑
The early period of WW2 was known in Britain as "The Phoney War" as not much action appeared to be taking place and life had continued almost as normal, however there had been some Naval activity like the forced scuttling of the German pocket battleship 'Graf Spee' at the Battle Of The River Plate in Dec 1939. An early moral booster for Britain.
But first you have to get everyone to stop what they are doing and pay attention to you. Then you need to have everyone involved state their race, gender, pronouns, sexual orientation and mental health status.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑We can hope that Matt's sense of survival will kick in before he kicks in the doors of the local Hell's Angels clubhouse and demands they stop trafficking strippers and hookers and other offenses against women. I'm in if we need an intervention. :drool:Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Guys, seriously share those experiences over at Facciani's. I'm honestly afraid the little dude will get jacked some day.
They finally have a WoC at the head of an atheist org and apparently it is a big yawn over at Pharyngula. The entirety of PZ's post:
A sum total of 0 comments.Debbie Goddard is the new vice president of American Atheists!
That’s the best news I’ve heard from that organization in ages. Now all they have to do is actually pay attention to her.
Well, we call double-teaming a woman "The card table"* ("Table for two, sir?") or less frequently, an "Awkward staring contest." Personally, I'm not "into" that shit IRL but don't judge peeps who are.
As my old SSM used to say - "I'd leopard-crawl through a minefield just to wank over their shadows!"
I think Matt's post is a hint that he is looking to switch occupations from caballero to Supreme Court Justice. If he opines that a sitting president can't be investigated, indicted, or impeached then you can be sure he is angling for a sick old lady's job.Bhurzum wrote: ↑Well, we call double-teaming a woman "The card table"* ("Table for two, sir?") or less frequently, an "Awkward staring contest." Personally, I'm not "into" that shit IRL but don't judge peeps who are.
Also, I like beer; beer good!
* amongst many other terms - "Air tight" being my favourite although this requires the tail-gunner to dirty his thumb.
I'd bring a bottle of lube.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ A buddy of mine just invited me to join him & his wife for a spitroast. What kind of wine is typically served with that? I thought it'd be polite to bring along a bottle.
He did say he'd save the rump for me. I guess it might get dry from overcooking.Lsuoma wrote: ↑I'd bring a bottle of lube.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ A buddy of mine just invited me to join him & his wife for a spitroast. What kind of wine is typically served with that? I thought it'd be polite to bring along a bottle.
For fuck sake...free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑I think Matt's post is a hint that he is looking to switch occupations from caballero to Supreme Court Justice. If he opines that a sitting president can't be investigated, indicted, or impeached then you can be sure he is angling for a sick old lady's job.
Ever heard of Rape at Knifepoint? It's a drinking game where you put a canola seed and knife in the middle of a table and surround them with 3 beers in a triangle...
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I said he might consider tenderizing the rump first, and he said good idea, but all it really needs is a good stuffing.
Is there going to be chocolate ice cream for afters? Perhaps with a cherry sauce?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑He did say he'd save the rump for me. I guess it might get dry from overcooking.Lsuoma wrote: ↑I'd bring a bottle of lube.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ A buddy of mine just invited me to join him & his wife for a spitroast. What kind of wine is typically served with that? I thought it'd be polite to bring along a bottle.
But so much worse if she sat on them.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Congressman from Hawaiian says he's "An Asian Trapped in A White Person's Body":
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... in-a-white
Which could actually happen to an asian if Lindy West sat next to them on a plane.
Looks interesting, though the religious tend to have some problematic biases in general and on that issue in particular. But the "thesis" - the terrible fraud of transgender "medicine" - looks to be right on the money.Lsuoma wrote: ↑ <snip>
Also, THIS is a fascinating lecture:
Code: Select all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mtQ1geeD_c
Barbara Kay wrote:A group of concerned endocrinologists, under the leadership of California-based Dr Michael Laidlaw, an endocrinologist trained in the study of hormones and glands, who treats diseases caused by hormone imbalances in patients, has written a letter of dissent to the editor of the JCEM, which has been accepted and will be published later this month. In a just-issued press release, Dr. Laidlaw’s group warns of the serious dangers of puberty blocking medications and cross sex hormones in the treatment of child and adolescent gender dysphoria: “Children and adolescents with questions about their gender are increasingly being given life-altering, irreversible hormones and surgery which can lead to increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, life threatening blood clots, permanent sterility, and sexual dysfunction, among other problems,” they state.
You can probably add actually listening to Goddard to his omissions.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑They finally have a WoC at the head of an atheist org and apparently it is a big yawn over at Pharyngula. The entirety of PZ's post:A sum total of 0 comments.Debbie Goddard is the new vice president of American Atheists!
That’s the best news I’ve heard from that organization in ages. Now all they have to do is actually pay attention to her.
PZ can't be bothered to even give a brief bio, a list of her accomplishments.Two crappy little sentences for someone that he and his crowd know fairly well and presumably was a friend of hers. And a condescending "they" have to listen to her, presumably because she is black and a woman although apparently the "we' that are the horde can't be bothered to even comment.It seems to escape them that treating blacks like tokens is racist too.
https://i.imgur.com/2vKwPqT.pngSteersman wrote: ↑But along the same line, Endocrinologists warn against hormone treatment for childhood gender dysphoria at Post Millennial. A relevant quote:Barbara Kay wrote:A group of concerned endocrinologists, under the leadership of California-based Dr Michael Laidlaw, an endocrinologist trained in the study of hormones and glands, who treats diseases caused by hormone imbalances in patients, has written a letter of dissent to the editor of the JCEM, which has been accepted and will be published later this month. In a just-issued press release, Dr. Laidlaw’s group warns of the serious dangers of puberty blocking medications and cross sex hormones in the treatment of child and adolescent gender dysphoria: “Children and adolescents with questions about their gender are increasingly being given life-altering, irreversible hormones and surgery which can lead to increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, life threatening blood clots, permanent sterility, and sexual dysfunction, among other problems,” they state.
With Lindy West, it's one & the same.screwtape wrote: ↑But so much worse if she sat on them.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Congressman from Hawaiian says he's "An Asian Trapped in A White Person's Body":
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... in-a-white
Which could actually happen to an asian if Lindy West sat next to them on a plane.
https://i.imgur.com/sIEggQ1.jpgMatt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑With Lindy West, it's one & the same.screwtape wrote: ↑But so much worse if she sat on them.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Congressman from Hawaiian says he's "An Asian Trapped in A White Person's Body":
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... in-a-white
Which could actually happen to an asian if Lindy West sat next to them on a plane.
Take some Yorkshire pudding, if it's beef, and mint sauce if it's lamb.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ A buddy of mine just invited me to join him & his wife for a spitroast. What kind of wine is typically served with that? I thought it'd be polite to bring along a bottle.
I still think he's the last guy who should be in charge... but Christ, he's entertaining :lol:AndrewV69 wrote: ↑ Every time I think I am safely ignoring US politics :
:o :o :o
https://twitter.com/BrentScher/status/1 ... 1471112192
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Ya, I should not laugh ... but seriously ... it is so hard not to.
To be shared with Anne Fausto-Sterling. :bjarte: