Aneris wrote:I want to apologize. You are right. The woman really showed it best. She was probably just doing nude aerobic. I guess it can happen that two times a "historical" flag is used, one time ironically, and probably means nothing. Of course, freedom of speech means that even Reichsbürgers should be invited to a skeptics channel to present their point of view, after all, one might learn something. I agree, that I also went too far with the Alex Jones connection. Freedom of speech means that he should be invited and given a stage, too. Why not. I guess it can happen that all these people like Trump, and share the same views in a couple of key matters (e.g. cultural marxism, culture war, distrust of the mainstream media, nationalism, etc). Since the YouTube community is really small, you can also be friends with someone like JonTron. Actually, I was only a bit worked out today, because I was supposed to get a large chunk of money. This had me worried, but it's resolved now. If you give me your bank account, I can transfer you something. It's about to arrive from a Nigerian prince or something.
Good grief.
The point of the livestream wasn't to support the ideas of the Reichsbürger, it was to support his freedom of speech. Noam Chomsky supported the freedom of speech of Robert Faurisson, a known holocaust denier, is Chomsky a holocaust denier sympathizer too?
Also when did Sargon invite Alex Jones? When did he "endorse" him?
And yes, of course, not liking the SJW-friendly media (Sargon explicitly provides evidence for SJW narratives in the media, and explicitly points out those we buck the trends) is a clear indication of nazism. And as we all know all nationalism is bad, it's all nationalsocialism without the socialism. And since Sargon says he's left-wing and he's a nationalism, he's provided the socialism for the nationalsocialism!
Oh, and Trump? He's not a populist/profiteer/con-man who is following the
exact same rotten script of US Republicans, down to neo-con politics now. No, he's literally Hitler, and anyone who's ever expressed an opinion even remotely positive on one of his ideas or policies or simply just refused to focus on criticizing him is a nazi sympathizer, too!
So I retract everything I wrote. You are completely right, and I won't be bringing this up again. Next time, when a man with a black beard drives a truck into a crowd, and shouts Allau Ackbar, it however has probably nothing to do with Islam. After all, that's just a normal religion, and perhaps he did it because he had a bad day. He probably shouted the words in an ironical fashion. My views on Sarah Nyberg were also transformed by this. After all, Nyberg writes it was just good edgelord fun. Since, you are not a total hypocrite, I think you'll agree with me.
Now you're just being deliberately stupid. You're comparing your guilt by association and taking clear trolling as "dog whistle" policies to
open and explicit declarations of intent. For the record as far as we know Nyberg
might have been trolling, too, there's no evidence she violated any law, even though she didn't write any "dog whistle" but
openly and explicitly advocated for sex with children.
Find me one instance of Sargon or Dave or Kraut and Tea
openly and explicitly advocating for nazi policies (not just for regulating immigration). Then this post will make some sense.
