Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Darling Miri claimed that one, too. These people are damaged.
There's an actual argument for it.
Basically, it's about allowing children to learn to set boundaries as to who may touch them and how and who they want to touch and how.
And that,per-se is not a bad thing. Indeed, despite all our hysteria about 'child molestation' and such, I've always liked the 'good touch', 'bad touch' training that many, possibly most kids are given these days. Totally and for arbitrary reasons violating someone's boundaries MAY be argued to normalize a 'rape culture' (in small caps instead in large like THE RAPE CULTURE which implies every aspect of culture encourages rape) in that if you don't learn to set boundaries you are more likely to be raped or otherwise abused.
However the proponents of this 'teach children bodily autonomy and boundaries meme' take it too far in two ways:
A. One, they forget that adults have the ability and the legal power and indeed, the necessity of SOMETIMES and for a good reason violating children's boundaries when doing such is for their own good.
B. The SJW's sexualize EVERYTHING. Just like "Abuse" is now defined as isolated instances of yelling or punching walls or pillows in lieu of people, singular shoves or grabs (real minor stuff) instead of , you know, choking , or hitting, or deliberately and repeatedly belittling them, a HUG is totally sexualized by the SJW brigade and the peck on the chin that little Johnny is forced (for social reasons) to give Dear Old Aunt Maude is compared to full-throated french kiss.
This is one reason why governments have so much power these days. This over-defining of rights and abuse involves meddling and takes the personal is political to a new level.