Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

[Søren Lilholt]

http://i.imgur.com/GnqeDg1.jpg

:mrgreen: :clap:

[Jan Steen]

I am shaking with rage tears right.

I so cannot even this.......

http://i.imgur.com/2Yw296t.png

Triggering, ableist, condescending, bullying. It's a perfect example of Meyers's baboons' approach to arguing.

The whole thread is quite fun, with a commenter called Pseudonym calling Nerd an idiot and getting dogpiled.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-861610

Can we please stop giving Peezus & Co more clicks than necessary. Just paste your FTB link here:

http://archive.org/web/

This gives:

http://web.archive.org/web/201410050859 ... nt-page-2/

You only lose the direct link to the specific comment, but that's a minor inconvenience. On the plus side, it also removes the pop-up ads.

Thanks on behalve of those who were falsely accused of being harassers, misogynists and rapists by Peezus.

[bovarchist]

The classical wizard represents the ideal, and the ideal is of course male. That’s the same thing. Always, without even thinking about it, thinking the ideal, the standard, the generic, the typical, the best, the most usual, the classic, the normal, is male, while the female is always the exception, the weird, the not as good – that’s the same thing. It’s the entrenched stereotype, that we’re all stuck with (unless we grew up in a very unusual and very isolated bubble), that males are general and right while women are defective.

One word: Polgara.

[Søren Lilholt]

Me, attention whoring:

http://i.imgur.com/sqRTQ3i.png

http://i.imgur.com/7zAJOsa.png

http://i.imgur.com/NorfTLy.png

http://i.imgur.com/00UO3Ze.png

http://i.imgur.com/awBFNXv.png

http://i.imgur.com/4LedTtF.png

http://i.imgur.com/sVybiX6.png

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-861610

She's still fucking at it, more than three hours after she said she was going to bed. She is a liar. It must point to a pathology by now. That chick would tell you she loved you while throwing a cup of piss in your face.

http://i.imgur.com/gKjFbbJ.png

http://i.imgur.com/TncNPje.png

Pharyngula is her whole life, isn't it?

If she wasn't such an utterly obnoxious prick, I'd feel sorry for her. What a saddo. Worse still, all she has for company is rats.

Well, that and her pet rodents. :rimshot:

[Apples]

Though I must admit, I'm having some difficulty believing that the Quimster was once a model. Unless there's a thriving market for dressing up chicken gizzards in haute couture.

Are you just saying you don't think of her as a proessional "model," or did you not see her photosets that franc tracked down?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/9078755ed13a ... o3_400.jpg

[Cliché Guevara]

In other news, Ophie has a post up about more "atheism has a dudebro problem". You might think this was something new, but, no....just another Marcotte "article" (if you can call it such). Does she think yet another article from within their circle is something notable? Marcotte saw money and/or influence and jumped at the chance to ride the gravy train (well, the gravy boat, and a sinking one at that).

:clap: :clap: :clap:

Also for all the snipped stuff.

Marcuntte was writing the exact same sort of stuff ten years ago when she was plucked out of nowhere to start contributing to Pandagon. She may be savvy at marketing and promoting her shtick (which, despite knee-jerk assumptions, does not necessarily mean it's all a cynical scheme), but I have no doubt she's a true believer who will still be finding entrenched misogyny behind every tree and under every bed even if she returns to obscurity.

[Søren Lilholt]

The classical wizard represents the ideal, and the ideal is of course male. That’s the same thing. Always, without even thinking about it, thinking the ideal, the standard, the generic, the typical, the best, the most usual, the classic, the normal, is male, while the female is always the exception, the weird, the not as good – that’s the same thing. It’s the entrenched stereotype, that we’re all stuck with (unless we grew up in a very unusual and very isolated bubble), that males are general and right while women are defective.

Projection, much?

And I wouldn't talk about being in "a very unusual and very isolated bubble" if I were you, Ophie. :lol:

Silly Moo.

[Snapfingers]

Shout out to tigzy for some top trolling on twatter!
:clap: :dance: :mrgreen:

[Badger3k]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BzB-I7KIQAA3InN.png

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Bravo, sirrah, bravo!

[Slipterid]

I think it's entirely Pit-like-esque to have loud pointless arguments about anything and everything. If people want to argue about their own personal boundaries and what they find offensive and inoffensive, I see nothing unPit about that. Really, the way I see it, arguments like this are what make this place almost entirely self-policing. With an obnoxious attention-whoring exception or two, discussion such as this help members gauge the general attitude of the Pit community, and this helps people when they consider posting something NSFW. At least, I'd like to think so.

Yes. This is partly why the Pit is such a wonderful place to visit as a semi-lurker. The place is full of variety, interest and honesty, usually delivered with humour. I can easily skip over anything that is either boring or irritating to me. Of course I may be biased because although I have personal boundaries the Pit has never overstepped them; I think that the reason for this is that everyone here has a warm, genuine heart and would never do real harm. Even the arseholes. I used to lurk over at the FTBlogs but I no longer bother because I kept seeing too much there that was frustrating or upsetting to me. My attitude to them is similar to my view of creationist screeds; I only look at them when I see a link from a place where they are being debunked.

As always I am several pages behind, so apologies if you have all moved on beyond this subject.

[Kirbmarc]

http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/ori ... 17-916.png

Is she really considered black? Because I'm darker than she is, and I'm 100% caucasian as far as I know.

https://scontent-a-mxp.xx.fbcdn.net/hph ... e=54C09D5D

[Badger3k]

I am shaking with rage tears right.

I so cannot even this.......

http://i.imgur.com/2Yw296t.png

Triggering, ableist, condescending, bullying. It's a perfect example of Meyers's baboons' approach to arguing.

The whole thread is quite fun, with a commenter called Pseudonym calling Nerd an idiot and getting dogpiled.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-861610

Can we please stop giving Peezus & Co more clicks than necessary. Just paste your FTB link here:

http://archive.org/web/

This gives:

http://web.archive.org/web/201410050859 ... nt-page-2/

You only lose the direct link to the specific comment, but that's a minor inconvenience. On the plus side, it also removes the pop-up ads.

Thanks on behalve of those who were falsely accused of being harassers, misogynists and rapists by Peezus.

Finally added that to my browser bar. You don't need to sign up?

[Apples]

Shout out to tigzy for some top trolling on twatter!
:clap: :dance: :mrgreen:

People who don't link things should die in a fire.

[Guest]

The classical wizard represents the ideal, and the ideal is of course male.

She's got a point. I mean just look at Harry Potter. Every single wizard in that series is male without exception.

[bhoytony]

Har, har.

[Lsuoma]

Looking through pictures of Leigh Alexander on the googles, the candid photos of her make her look visibly mixed.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kXnBSb1l56k/maxresdefault.jpg

Half human, half orc?

[comhcinc]

Though I must admit, I'm having some difficulty believing that the Quimster was once a model. Unless there's a thriving market for dressing up chicken gizzards in haute couture.

Are you just saying you don't think of her as a proessional "model," or did you not see her photosets that franc tracked down?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/9078755ed13a ... o3_400.jpg

He (he?) is saying that since he has an issue with with Zoe that she must be ugly. It's pretty common tactic and one of the very few points that the feminist are right about. Disagree with a woman, talk about how ugly or unfuckable she is. I find it pretty childish, boring, and honestly unhelpful helping them prove a point.

I am finding the same is Leigh Alexander mixed race just as bad if not fucking worst. Who cares, doesn't matter. It's unhelpful to question ever claim someone makes about themselves. Also it appears that people doing that are just fucking wrong. Apologize and get back to discussing/fighting her ideology.

[Gumby]

[.img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BzB-I7KIQAA3InN.png[/img]

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Bravo, sirrah, bravo!

Just to clarify - I found that on Twitter, I didn't make it myself.

[Gumby]

Peter Boghossian discusses the current radfem-poisoned environment in the a/s community, taking note of the usual suspects' involvement in creating an atmosphere where disagreement is censored, etc... you know, all the shit we talk about every day here.

Feminists vs. Atheists: The Death of Rational Discourse - Dr Peter Boghossian and Stefan Molyneux
[youtube]kdS9QFaXRQ4[/youtube]

Nothing groundbreaking, but every additional voice is welcome.

[Kirbmarc]

I am finding the same is Leigh Alexander mixed race just as bad if not fucking worst. Who cares, doesn't matter. It's unhelpful to question ever claim someone makes about themselves. Also it appears that people doing that are just fucking wrong. Apologize and get back to discussing/fighting her ideology.

It matters because she claims she's oppressed and subject to microaggression and casual racism, for being mixed race, when it's clear that few people could tell that she was mixed race unless she told them, which makes people question the truth of her claims.

[Brive1987]

Still it's amazing Zoe tries to pull that look off.

Because it's pretty rancid.

[Gumby]

[another lurker]

Link to topless photo of zq
http://38.media.tumblr.com/9da4a7ab52d2 ... 2_1280.png

[Brive1987]

As I thought. Nothing on Stollznow on FtB for the past months worth of renewed blitz on rape/assault.

Lousy's page update was a Shermer one on his timeline.

http://i.imgur.com/F8LG4Go.jpg

[comhcinc]

I am finding the same is Leigh Alexander mixed race just as bad if not fucking worst. Who cares, doesn't matter. It's unhelpful to question ever claim someone makes about themselves. Also it appears that people doing that are just fucking wrong. Apologize and get back to discussing/fighting her ideology.

It matters because she claims she's oppressed and subject to microaggression and casual racism, for being mixed race, when it's clear that few people could tell that she was mixed race unless she told them, which makes people question the truth of her claims.

Oh so because you couldn't tell her race in some picture (make-up, good lighting, photoshopped) pictures, that's some how fair game.

I would argue that black people are not oppressed, that there is no such things as microaggression and that why casual racism surely exist, it a small challenge that most people are able to get past every day of their lives.

I would argue that being a certain race, or mixed, does not give you any extra clout when talking about issues that face society. That while you have surely had different experiences from me because of your race, it does not make it sure I can not think critically about the subject.

I would argue that much of the "black experience" at least in America is much more a result of class than of color.


But hey you go ahead and tell her, she isn't mixed. Go head. Because arguing that point you are by default allowing that oppression, microaggression and casual racism are big issues, and only certain people are allowed to discuss them.

[Brive1987]

If you were to go to the hessianwithteeth article (which I recommend against, yet another gormless rehash and faux horror) who would you find at the top of the recommended reading list?

Well Mr Mattusmaximus himself, the skeptical teacher.

"Schism, what schism"

Wanker.

http://i.imgur.com/vlDX2Uf.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/ttb8wqQ.jpg

[Brive1987]

Link to topless photo of zq
http://38.media.tumblr.com/9da4a7ab52d2 ... 2_1280.png

Well if it's on display, the comment remains "what's not to like"?

:cdc:

[Brive1987]

Not.

[Brive1987]

Link to topless photo of zq
http://38.media.tumblr.com/9da4a7ab52d2 ... 2_1280.png

A shit pic in human form is still a shit pic.

*blocked*

[comhcinc]

Link to topless photo of zq
http://38.media.tumblr.com/9da4a7ab52d2 ... 2_1280.png

A shit pic in human form is still a shit pic.

*blocked*

http://i.imgur.com/tE3wQcn.png

[deLurch]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BzHlQ0kIgAA1xs9.png:large

OK. What movie is that from.

[Apples]

*sigh* guess I'll have to enact the labor myself



lol totally worth it

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-05-2014/hOCido.gif

[Kirbmarc]

Oh so because you couldn't tell her race in some picture (make-up, good lighting, photoshopped) pictures, that's some how fair game.

I would argue that black people are not oppressed, that there is no such things as microaggression and that why casual racism surely exist, it a small challenge that most people are able to get past every day of their lives.

I would argue that being a certain race, or mixed, does not give you any extra clout when talking about issues that face society. That while you have surely had different experiences from me because of your race, it does not make it sure I can not think critically about the subject.

I would argue that much of the "black experience" at least in America is much more a result of class than of color.


But hey you go ahead and tell her, she isn't mixed. Go head. Because arguing that point you are by default allowing that oppression, microaggression and casual racism are big issues, and only certain people are allowed to discuss them.

I'm not telling her that she isn't mixed. I honestly don't know if she is, and she could be, for all I care. I'm arguing that I find it hard to believe her "lived experience" of casual racism against her when it's hard to tell that she has black ancestry unless you know it.

I actually agree with you on most points you make. I just wanted to point out that her story of her oppression look even less believable than others. If you are 5 feet 11 inches tall but complain that people bully you for being short, I find it a little hard to believe.

If she is white-presenting but complains of people being racism against her because she's black, I find her story a little hard to believe.

[Apples]

Oh so because you couldn't tell her race in some picture (make-up, good lighting, photoshopped) pictures, that's some how fair game.

I would argue that black people are not oppressed, that there is no such things as microaggression and that why casual racism surely exist, it a small challenge that most people are able to get past every day of their lives.

I would argue that being a certain race, or mixed, does not give you any extra clout when talking about issues that face society. That while you have surely had different experiences from me because of your race, it does not make it sure I can not think critically about the subject.

I would argue that much of the "black experience" at least in America is much more a result of class than of color.


But hey you go ahead and tell her, she isn't mixed. Go head. Because arguing that point you are by default allowing that oppression, microaggression and casual racism are big issues, and only certain people are allowed to discuss them.

I'm not telling her that she isn't mixed. I honestly don't know if she is, and she could be, for all I care. I'm arguing that I find it hard to believe her "lived experience" of casual racism against her when it's hard to tell that she has black ancestry unless you know it.

I actually agree with you on most points you make. I just wanted to point out that her story of her oppression look even less believable than others. If you are 5 feet 11 inches tall but complain that people bully you for being short, I find it a little hard to believe.

If she is white-presenting but complains of people being racism against her because she's black, I find her story a little hard to believe.

I think this discussion was sparked because people have accused her of racy remarks ("I don't like hood people making comments to me from cars," etc.), and then someone white-knighted her on twitter, saying something like, "she's black, she can't be racist against blacks."

Not sure she's really, herself, claimed to be a "victim" of racism. She did write the 'i am thinking about twerking' essay, which I posted yesterday, in which she talks about her ethnic background and admits that she appears white/Jewish and not black. She also talks about feeling "alienated" because of her mixed racialosity/that of her family. But she explicitly says she doesn't feel comfortable claiming to have "experienced racism."

[piero]

Well, even though the damned thing doesn't make a lick of sense... you're welcome. Once I get more of a sense of your posting style I'll try to come up with something more appropriate for your avatar. Maybe an explosive diarrhea gif?

Yeah, why not. With some peanuts.

[Tigzy]

Josh boils the complex shims down to its core:

http://i.imgur.com/R1k8Do9.jpg

'I fuckin hate men' is not something I expected to hear from any gay, least of all the official spokesone.

[Gumby]

*sigh* guess I'll have to enact the labor myself



lol totally worth it

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-05-2014/hOCido.gif

:D
Tigzy was in fine form indeed. I wish I could troll like him (and Parsehole).

[Tigzy]

He (he?) is saying that since he has an issue with with Zoe that she must be ugly. It's pretty common tactic and one of the very few points that the feminist are right about. Disagree with a woman, talk about how ugly or unfuckable she is. I find it pretty childish, boring, and honestly unhelpful helping them prove a point.

When the fems drop the 'fat, basement-dwelling neckbearded virgin' thing, then I'll start cutting them some slack on their general physical repulsiveness. Seems fair enough to me.

And it's 'Xe', motherfucker.

[comhcinc]

I'm not telling her that she isn't mixed.

No, but you are opening questioning it as if it matters.

Is she really considered black? Because I'm darker than she is, and I'm 100% caucasian as far as I know.

I honestly don't know if she is, and she could be, for all I care. I'm arguing that I find it hard to believe her "lived experience" of casual racism against her when it's hard to tell that she has black ancestry unless you know it.

You may find this hard to believe being what I have been saying but she looks pretty black to me in her twitter photo and every other picture posted so far. Maybe it is just my white southern racist roots showing but looking past her skin tone and at her physical features I would assume she was mixed. (on a side note there was a story on tv recently about biracial twins, I looked for it and could not find it, one was suppose to look white while the other black, both looked black to me just a skin tone difference)

I actually agree with you on most points you make. I just wanted to point out that her story of her oppression look even less believable than others. If you are 5 feet 11 inches tall but complain that people bully you for being short, I find it a little hard to believe.

If she is white-presenting but complains of people being racism against her because she's black, I find her story a little hard to believe.

And all she has to say is she is "white presenting" because of the x,y,z of her oppression. Why not just accept what she says about herself and argue the points she is making?

[Kirbmarc]

I think this discussion was sparked because people have accused her of racy remarks ("I don't like hood people making comments to me from cars," etc.), and then someone white-knighted her on twitter, saying something like, "she's black, she can't be racist against blacks."

Not sure she's really, herself, claimed to be a "victim" of racism. She did write the 'i am thinking about twerking' essay, which I posted yesterday, in which she talks about her ethnic background and admits that she appears white/Jewish and not black. She also talks about feeling "alienated" because of her mixed racialosity/that of her family. But she explicitly says she doesn't feel comfortable claiming to have "experienced racism."

I made a mistake then. I thought that she claimed she couldn't be racist because she's black and experienced racism as a victim. If it's another person white-knighting for her I can't blame her for other people's opinions.

I still think that her SJW ideology is wrong, and that the white knight's argument is fallacious, but I recognize that I misunderstood the series of events, and for that I apologize.

[Immanuel K]

Immanuel K, never shirking
Switched to shooping when poems weren't working
PZ eying the ass
Of some lass in his class
While she no doubt was thinking of twerking.

Bovarchist went beserking
Over this meme we call twerking
In his sex fantasy, he rhymed about me
No doubt while wanking and jerking

Thats double plus good mastubation
But only in his sizable imagination
Unlike in the pic, of his zero point dick
Which triggers no lubrication

He´s the forum climate´s Martin Durkin
Until proven wrong i´ll keep asserting
That Bovarchists state of mind´s like the name of the band
Who wrote the song "March of the Gherkins"

[Tigzy]

*sigh* guess I'll have to enact the labor myself



lol totally worth it

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-05-2014/hOCido.gif

:D
Tigzy was in fine form indeed. I wish I could troll like him (and Parsehole).

When it comes to SJW, just use their own tactics against them. It's funny - you can usually call them racist, and they'll never actually deny it. Try it sometime. Tis a fine amusement.

[deLurch]

Looking through pictures of Leigh Alexander on the googles, the candid photos of her make her look visibly mixed.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kXnBSb1l56k/maxresdefault.jpg

Yeah, candid photos come across much differently.
http://i.imgur.com/5X5Z1S7.jpg

Of course when she makes herself up for a myspace style closeup selfie, she does an excellent job.
http://i.imgur.com/6mAuhyh.jpg

[comhcinc]

He (he?) is saying that since he has an issue with with Zoe that she must be ugly. It's pretty common tactic and one of the very few points that the feminist are right about. Disagree with a woman, talk about how ugly or unfuckable she is. I find it pretty childish, boring, and honestly unhelpful helping them prove a point.

When the fems drop the 'fat, basement-dwelling neckbearded virgin' thing, then I'll start cutting them some slack on their general physical repulsiveness. Seems fair enough to me.

And it's 'Xe', motherfucker.

They are like a piece of shit thus I will act like a piece of shit. Yeah that is not a nasty cycle that won't ever end.

[Gumby]

When it comes to SJW, just use their own tactics against them. It's funny - you can usually call them racist, and they'll never actually deny it. Try it sometime. Tis a fine amusement.

I don't know how much luck I'd have, given that my twatter handle is @Slymepit. If I ever feel the urge to troll the SJWs I'd have to create a new account.

[Gumby]

OK enough of this place for the day. Or at least for the morning. I never get anything useful done when I'm bantering with you racist misogynist rapist pigs.

[Tigzy]

They are like a piece of shit thus I will act like a piece of shit. Yeah that is not a nasty cycle that won't ever end.

:lol: - it wouldn't fucking end anyway. Seriously, you think the fems will actually stop with the neckbeard thing if their opponents didn't make remarks about looks? Remember, you're dealing with certain factions which routinely call for the extermination of all men to the sound of titters from their audience. Nah, give em a taste of their own hypocrisy; and if it hurts their feelings - well, good.

[comhcinc]

I think this discussion was sparked because people have accused her of racy remarks ("I don't like hood people making comments to me from cars," etc.), and then someone white-knighted her on twitter, saying something like, "she's black, she can't be racist against blacks."

Not sure she's really, herself, claimed to be a "victim" of racism. She did write the 'i am thinking about twerking' essay, which I posted yesterday, in which she talks about her ethnic background and admits that she appears white/Jewish and not black. She also talks about feeling "alienated" because of her mixed racialosity/that of her family. But she explicitly says she doesn't feel comfortable claiming to have "experienced racism."

Yeah I that was my take away too. I just hate this game of questioning every little thing a person says. It is exactly what PZ and his bunch does.

I don't like creating caricatures of people just so I can mock them. I know I am never going to convince Leigh Alexander that she is wrong. I may convince someone looking at these discusses we have that I am right.

[Apples]

I think this discussion was sparked because people have accused her of racy remarks ("I don't like hood people making comments to me from cars," etc.), and then someone white-knighted her on twitter, saying something like, "she's black, she can't be racist against blacks."

Not sure she's really, herself, claimed to be a "victim" of racism. She did write the 'i am thinking about twerking' essay, which I posted yesterday, in which she talks about her ethnic background and admits that she appears white/Jewish and not black. She also talks about feeling "alienated" because of her mixed racialosity/that of her family. But she explicitly says she doesn't feel comfortable claiming to have "experienced racism."

I made a mistake then. I thought that she claimed she couldn't be racist because she's black and experienced racism as a victim. If it's another person white-knighting for her I can't blame her for other people's opinions.

I still think that her SJW ideology is wrong, and that the white knight's argument is fallacious, but I recognize that I misunderstood the series of events, and for that I apologize.

#racistshitlordnotpology

[comhcinc]

They are like a piece of shit thus I will act like a piece of shit. Yeah that is not a nasty cycle that won't ever end.

:lol: - it wouldn't fucking end anyway. Seriously, you think the fems will actually stop with the neckbeard thing if their opponents didn't make remarks about looks? Remember, you're dealing with certain factions which routinely call for the extermination of all men to the sound of titters from their audience. Nah, give em a taste of their own hypocrisy; and if it hurts their feelings - well, good.

No I don't think they will ever stop yelling about neckbeards but I do know that if they are the only one making unnecessary personal attacks then people will stop listening to them.

The Klan use to have some pull. So did the Black Panthers. When looking a less organization and more at ideology look at the gay marriage issue in America. In the 80s most of the country was against it. Now most of the country is for it. Part of the reason is because the major opponents such as ole' Pat Robinson keep making retard claims that all the bullshit that the gheys bring.

When a woman says "people don't respect women" and your response is to go "she is ugly" even if it is just in a list of two hundred issues you have with the woman, then you just gave them the weapon they need.

Sides' are the big mean bad feminist hurting your feels by talking about your neckbeard?

[Kirbmarc]

You may find this hard to believe being what I have been saying but she looks pretty black to me in her twitter photo and every other picture posted so far. Maybe it is just my white southern racist roots showing but looking past her skin tone and at her physical features I would assume she was mixed. (on a side note there was a story on tv recently about biracial twins, I looked for it and could not find it, one was suppose to look white while the other black, both looked black to me just a skin tone difference)

I guess i just don't really get what "black" means then. I always thought that being classified as "black"by racists was a matter of skin tone.

And all she has to say is she is "white presenting" because of the x,y,z of her oppression. Why not just accept what she says about herself and argue the points she is making?

Because I thought that the point she was making was "I'm black, I experienced racism, therefore I can't be racist against blacks". The conclusion of this syllogism is of course a fallacy, but I was having doubts about the "I experienced racism" part of the premise, too.

It turned out it was someone else who made the claim, so I made a mistake.

[comhcinc]

I still think that her SJW ideology is wrong, and that the white knight's argument is fallacious, but I recognize that I misunderstood the series of events, and for that I apologize.

Cool I agree with you too on that (as often with forums I am catching up). To celebrate our understanding let me sing you the song of my people.

[youtube]e9IRAgpF2f0[/youtube]

[Kirbmarc]

I just hate this game of questioning every little thing a person says. It is exactly what PZ and his bunch does.

To be fair questioning other people's claims what you do as a skeptic. PZ, if anything, is far too trusting (when it suits his ideology).

[comhcinc]

I guess i just don't really get what "black" means then. I always thought that being classified as "black"by racists was a matter of skin tone.

No where I am from it would denote where your ancestors come from is in a very broad term. You are either white (from any upper European country, British isles, russian) Black (anywhere in Africa), Chinese (any Asian), Mexican (Mexico and below), or Camel Jockey (Middle East, Indian sub continent, lower European countries).

Don't matter the skin tone, just that someone in your past was from there at some point. Except white. You must have a clean line back.

I didn't make the rules but I grew up around them.

[comhcinc]

I just hate this game of questioning every little thing a person says. It is exactly what PZ and his bunch does.

To be fair questioning other people's claims what you do as a skeptic. PZ, if anything, is far too trusting (when it suits his ideology).

There is skepticism and then there is hyper skepticism. There is also asking the relative questions and not worrying about the unimportant stuff.

If I told you a spaceship came down out of the sky at 6 am and purple being from the planet Glick got out and and told me I should rape your mother and that you should help, it really should not be important if was 6 on the dot or 5 after 6.

[TheMan]

Rabbitohs.... Champions 2014

[Tigzy]

They are like a piece of shit thus I will act like a piece of shit. Yeah that is not a nasty cycle that won't ever end.

:lol: - it wouldn't fucking end anyway. Seriously, you think the fems will actually stop with the neckbeard thing if their opponents didn't make remarks about looks? Remember, you're dealing with certain factions which routinely call for the extermination of all men to the sound of titters from their audience. Nah, give em a taste of their own hypocrisy; and if it hurts their feelings - well, good.

No I don't think they will ever stop yelling about neckbeards but I do know that if they are the only one making unnecessary personal attacks then people will stop listening to them.

The Klan use to have some pull. So did the Black Panthers. When looking a less organization and more at ideology look at the gay marriage issue in America. In the 80s most of the country was against it. Now most of the country is for it. Part of the reason is because the major opponents such as ole' Pat Robinson keep making retard claims that all the bullshit that the gheys bring.

When a woman says "people don't respect women" and your response is to go "she is ugly" even if it is just in a list of two hundred issues you have with the woman, then you just gave them the weapon they need.

Sides' are the big mean bad feminist hurting your feels by talking about your neckbeard?

Oops - strawman. You're working from the basis that the only, or greater portion, of the responses people make to radfem excesses is to say, 'you're ugly etc etc'. This is bollocks. My remarks as to the Quimster's physical rankness weren't in response to any argument she put forward. I just said it because I don't like her and because it's true. There's plenty of good counter-argument out there - and if it's sauced up a little by some personal remarks from either side - well, that's people for ya.

Seriously, if you don't think insulting people based on their looks is a good idea - then just don't do it. I dunno, maybe you're someone so lofty in your refinements that you've never made a judgement call on someone's appearance - I mean, I can definitely see you as the type to go for personality over looks (oh meow, girlfriend).

[sinister]

Vagina dentida?

What YT accidentally did to Raven in Neal Stephensons' Snow Crash made an indelible imprint on my young brain. (The lower one)

Me too! Hahaha!

[katamari Damassi]

lol totally worth it

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-05-2014/hOCido.gif

:D
Tigzy was in fine form indeed. I wish I could troll like him (and Parsehole).

Jesus Christ I hope that's a toy in the dog's mouth. I'd rather look at a million animated scat gifs than a single animal cruelty one.

[JackSkeptic]

One marked difference between the current Nugent discussions and the ones from last year is the awareness people have of their tactics. It was frustrating last year that the SJW's were believed so readily and it took enormousness effort to deal with that. It seems to take a lot of time for some people to accept the obvious about their tactics despite it being easily observed. You still see this blinkered attitude with some people, notably several posters at JREF, but at least it seems the silent majority has finally worked them out.

But really, if the SJW's had any subtlety their effectiveness would be considerably higher and they would be winning. Why some people need the obvious pointed out to them, with substantial evidence, for two years before they accept it is beyond me. The SJW's are always about cult tactics. They attack leaders and abuse anyone who disagrees with them while controlling spaces and establishing a tribal ethos. They have been doing this openly. So why were so many blind to it?