Stefunny and ReGreta open the door to questions: Not

[John Greg]

Just go and read the two posts by these two professional dingbats, and then ponder how they can even convince themselves that they even understand the concept of critical thinking and a sound intellect.

Stefunny InZvanity: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... -atheists/

ReGreta ReGreta: http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2012/ ... o-do-list/

Now, apparently, for these paragons of intellect and critical thought, not only is questioning the validity or even degree of validity of one of their claims wrong, asking for any kind of proof is also utterly wrong.

On a weekly basis, someone at FfTB shows themselves to be even stupider than they were the week before, and makes me shake my head in disbelief. It's no wonder we coninue the discussion; their idiocy is endless and only increases.

[Tigzy]

Though as far as Greta seems to be concerned, asking for proof is fine as long as you want to confirm your biases: http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2012/ ... mmunities/

Seems she's already decided that there is problem with racism in the Atheist/Skeptic community; no doubt any timorous question along the lines of, 'Yeah, Greet, but can you really extrapolate the existence of a tenable problem on the basis of people commenting on your blog?' will no doubt be shriekingly denounced as a racist.

One theme in particular keeps cropping up — the theme that this isn’t really a problem, coupled with a hyper-skeptical demand for evidence and examples of this racism. (As if we needed more freaking evidence that racism is a real thing.)

But Greet, you silly tool - the question was the extent of racism in the community. NOT that fact the racism exists. Priming, much?

In terms of the intrinsic quality of the 'evidence' gathered here, she might as well post on Stormfront asking for examples of how non-whites are keeping whitey down.