Periodic Table of Swearing

#16981

Rystefn wrote:It would be easy for someone to slip in there, and even gain a place of prominence, in the A+ idiocy using Poe's Law.... but if someone actually pulled a Sokal move, I'll be impressed. Their ideals may be stupid, but they're not actually incoherent enough to make that easy to do.

I politely beg to differ, having spent several afternoons reading the forums and going.. wut. wut.

If you tell people they're very right and all their opinions are valid, you are IN in a biiiiig way. Also, keep repeating that you used to think differently but now you've seen the light and you understand social justice on account of having an epiphany about how people get treated.

Bonus points if you're a fake underprivileged person. Just don't be too underprivileged. I notice the cannibal kid hasn't become a mod.

#16982

John D wrote:I might as well lower the tone as far as possible... No other comment necessary.
http://theotheratheists.net/user/428777 ... 114224.jpg

Hmmmm... do I see signs that Becky is developing back boobs? You have to watch out for those. Once you develop them I hear they are impossible to get rid of:

http://media.peopleofwalmart.com/wp-con ... 11/573.jpg

#16983

codelette wrote:Thanks rayshul. :D

On another note and something that was somehow discussed by Skeptickle: do these people do real activism besides the navel gazing and the cashing-in on "preaching to the choir" conferences?
It seems that all they do is sign e-petitions and raise like three bucks to send people to conferences.

I can't remember which one it was, and I sure as shit didn't watch the entire thing but there's a google hangout with them (ftb bloggers) on youtube discussing how they don't need to actually work towards accomplishing goals. Their role is to be the "thinkers", and to do what they're "good at", which apparently is writing.

#16984

OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

#16985

cunt wrote:
codelette wrote:Thanks rayshul. :D

On another note and something that was somehow discussed by Skeptickle: do these people do real activism besides the navel gazing and the cashing-in on "preaching to the choir" conferences?
It seems that all they do is sign e-petitions and raise like three bucks to send people to conferences.
I can't remember which one it was, and I sure as shit didn't watch the entire thing but there's a google hangout with them (ftb bloggers) on youtube discussing how they don't need to actually work towards accomplishing goals. Their role is to be the "thinkers", and to do what they're "good at", which apparently is writing.

"Those who can't do. Teach."

Thanks PZ!

#16986

codelette wrote:On another note and something that was somehow discussed by Skeptickle: do these people do real activism besides the navel gazing and the cashing-in on "preaching to the choir" conferences?
It seems that all they do is sign e-petitions and raise like three bucks to send people to conferences.

I've yet to see any, actually, from the main people. Others who are tangentially involved or not-quite-ready-to-tell-people-it's-stupid (like Hemant, early-Namezie) do really impressive work in social justice. Greta did contribute to the naked revolutionaries calendar and the 'pit definitely gave her props for that.

Their attempt at Aplusscribe is a good idea but it was implemented terribly and almost illegally, and has generally fucked off a whole horde of people.

#16987

Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

I predict legendary lols.

#16988

rayshul wrote:
codelette wrote:On another note and something that was somehow discussed by Skeptickle: do these people do real activism besides the navel gazing and the cashing-in on "preaching to the choir" conferences?
It seems that all they do is sign e-petitions and raise like three bucks to send people to conferences.
I've yet to see any, actually, from the main people. Others who are tangentially involved or not-quite-ready-to-tell-people-it's-stupid (like Hemant, early-Namezie) do really impressive work in social justice. Greta did contribute to the naked revolutionaries calendar and the 'pit definitely gave her props for that.

Their attempt at Aplusscribe is a good idea but it was implemented terribly and almost illegally, and has generally fucked off a whole horde of people.

I knew about Hemant, but then I don't consider part of the navel-gazing pack. I was mainly talking about the FC5 (or 4?).
Good to hear about Greta. I guess that day she didn't have to go to the bank.

#16989

Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

Holy shit! If that's true then it makes the Dillahunty thing a mere fart in the bath. **Currently searching the A+ forums to get a clue on the mystery moderator...**

#16990

rayshul wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.
I predict legendary lols.

END OF DAYS! :dance:

#16991

Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

If proven to be true, that's epic and will accelerate the catastrophic spiral downward considerably.

#16992

Dick Strawkins= Legend.

I really hope he doesn't get caught but I reckon with a bit of free time and joining some dots I could work out who it is......Joined late after gaining notoriety in a dogpile, threatened to flounce over the Matt D. affair. Meh.
Good on him. Best laugh of the day.

#16993

This whole fake A+ moderator has me completely HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ... rolling on the fucking floor. Perfect, absolutely fucking perfect.

What's next? A - A+ = the Gnu A++

#16994

Tigzy wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.
Holy shit! If that's true then it makes the Dillahunty thing a mere fart in the bath. **Currently searching the A+ forums to get a clue on the mystery moderator...**

Pm me with your findings :twisted:

#16995

If I had a Titter account, I'd be tweeting a link to Dick's post already - cos that's really gonna shit the A+ mods up good and proper, and might even take the heat off poor old Dolly Dillahunty for a while. I admit, I have come to feel a little sorry for him in recent days - not so much 'Otis' Ned Beatty, but 'Deliverance' Ned Beatty getting right shafted by dingbats.

#16996

Shall we take bets. I'm betting Piegasm.

#16997

cunt wrote:Shall we take bets. I'm betting Piegasm.

I hope to god it's Flewellyn. Being the guy who deleted Matt's "curious" post but was then defended to the hilt by the mob and asked to apologise by the entire forum and Jason Theibault....that would be so grand. I don't know enough about him though so he might not fit the bill.

#16998

Tigzy wrote:If I had a Titter account, I'd be tweeting a link to Dick's post already - cos that's really gonna shit the A+ mods up good and proper, and might even take the heat off poor old Dolly Dillahunty for a while. I admit, I have come to feel a little sorry for him in recent days - not so much 'Otis' Ned Beatty, but 'Deliverance' Ned Beatty getting right shafted by dingbats.

Yeah, can somebody with twitter tweet this amazing piece of new info? Let's stir shit!

#16999

Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:Shall we take bets. I'm betting Piegasm.
I hope to god it's Flewellyn. Being the guy who deleted Matt's "curious" post but was then defended to the hilt by the mob and asked to apologise by the entire forum and Jason Theibault....that would be so grand. I don't know enough about him though so he might not fit the bill.

Flewellyn? Not in a million years - he's a paid-up FfTBer. Piegasm remains a possibility. Investigating Submor at the moment...

#17000

http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

#17001

Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:Shall we take bets. I'm betting Piegasm.
I hope to god it's Flewellyn. Being the guy who deleted Matt's "curious" post but was then defended to the hilt by the mob and asked to apologise by the entire forum and Jason Theibault....that would be so grand. I don't know enough about him though so he might not fit the bill.

1 for piegasm, 1 for flewelleyn.

It would be fucking brilliant if it was him, but nah. He's a bit too concerned about defending it outside of the forum. I think he's a true believer and this is the first time in his life he's been entrusted with any responsibility.

#17002

Skep tickle wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Class!

I can't help but feel these people are doing their best impressions of the peasant from Monty Python. Except instead of anarcho-syndicalist communes, it's patriarchy.
Yes! Mixed, at times, with the Frenchman guarding the castle from atop the wall.

No fair! Dennis the Peasant made a lot more sense than them, and besides, loudmouthed working-class guys and French taunters belong with the opposition. These guys are the People's Front of Judea, or the witch-burning crowd if you want something from the Holy Grail.

#17003

codelette wrote: On another note and something that was somehow discussed by Skeptickle: do these people do real activism besides the navel gazing and the cashing-in on "preaching to the choir" conferences?
It seems that all they do is sign e-petitions and raise like three bucks to send people to conferences.

Let's put it this way, Jen McCreight (the 'founder' of A+) quit after about a month or so of launching her revolutionary movement to change the public face of atheism. What's left of the idea has been passed on to a bunch of emotionally stunted shut-ins who really don't sound competent enough to organize a 'mass' movement of people, let alone a so called social justice movement.

Oh and welcome to the Pit :D

#17004

@Gumby - I reckon that pretty soon, Comical Jenni is gonna have a bit more to be concerned about than wanking tramps. :lol:

#17005

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

Fucking hell Jen he has to sleep outside every night where do you expect he's going to have a wank?

#17006

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

How does she know they're masturbating to her? Maybe they're just masturbating as she happens to walk-by. It's not like they have a home to go to and jerk off. Note, I'm not making excuses for public masturbation, I'm just saying don't flatter yourself too much Jen, cuz a couple of hobos have masturbated near me too, and I doubt they were checking me out.

#17007

Too late! In a pre-emptive strike the A+theists may have decided (haven't read it all yet) that they don't need atheism!
To which my response would be: "Good, can the grown ups have it back now?"

#17008

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

Remember too that Jen feels safer walking to work than she does at Atheism conferences!
I've never been to one of these events but hearing of this mornings adventures for Jen I can only picture some kind of onanistic olympics where you need chest level waders to avoid drowning in spunk as you walk between talks. :shock:

#17009

A snippet of a conversation between Jamie Stanton and A+ moderator "SubMor" on the "Rhys Morgan wants us to fuck off and die" thread:

********************

http://i50.tinypic.com/1gsnfd.jpg

********************
Could these assclowns be any more hyporitical? "We are Atheism+. We are Social Justice Warriors, and believe all people should be treated exactly the same, regardless of superficial differences. Oh, wait, no we don't."

#17010

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

Wow. Ok, yeah, I don't want to see someone masturbating in public while on my way to work either. However, it seems very, very hypocritical of Jennifer McCreight to be so full of disdain considering she suffers from depression - a *mental illness*. Many homeless suffer from mental illness. I wonder why it didn't occur to this "social warrior" to find a way to help this man???

#17011

Hello,
Just delurking to vote for Maiforpeace. I know that it is highly improbable but I would love it.

#17012

real horrorshow wrote:Too late! In a pre-emptive strike the A+theists may have decided (haven't read it all yet) that they don't need atheism!
To which my response would be: "Good, can the grown ups have it back now?"

Does that mean that they'e just called Plus now?

#17013

Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

If this is true, I'm so cynical that I still think they'll manage to rationalize this as justification for their victim status and evidence of all the oppression and abuse they have to face on a daily basis. As to why they couldn't spot the obvious bullshitter amongst their midst if their complaints are substantive, I predict they'll probably remain deafeningly silent on.

#17014

animaculo wrote:Hello,
Just delurking to vote for Maiforpeace. I know that it is highly improbable but I would love it.

A longshot. Double points if it is Maiforpeace.

1. Piegasm
2. Flewellyn
3. Maiforpeace

Numbers 4-22 are so far unclaimed. lol, 22 mods and no vetting.

#17015

Saint N. wrote:How does she know they're masturbating to her? Maybe they're just masturbating as she happens to walk-by. It's not like they have a home to go to and jerk off. Note, I'm not making excuses for public masturbation, I'm just saying don't flatter yourself too much Jen, cuz a couple of hobos have masturbated near me too, and I doubt they were checking me out.

It's not public masturbation she's complaining about. It's masturbation without her consent! I always thought one of the benefits of a wank was that you didn't need anyone's consent.

Oh, and hypothetically, if he asked Jen if it was okay for him to knock one out, would he get the go ahead?

#17016

Saint N. wrote: How does she know they're masturbating to her? Maybe they're just masturbating as she happens to walk-by. It's not like they have a home to go to and jerk off. Note, I'm not making excuses for public masturbation, I'm just saying don't flatter yourself too much Jen, cuz a couple of hobos have masturbated near me too, and I doubt they were checking me out.

To be fair, she never said specifically that the homeless man was wanking to her - I think you may have misread that middle tweet.

I wonder if that homeless man went to the library later and tweeted:

"Apparently my day is going to start by trying to squeeze one out in private only to have some saggy skank stop and stare at me."

#17017

animaculo wrote:Hello,
Just delurking to vote for Maiforpeace. I know that it is highly improbable but I would love it.

Doubtful, but that would be worth a Googollulz right there.

#17018

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Wait, so now homeless people need Jen's "consent" before they rub one out? Need the forms be submitted in triplicate?

Guest · #17019

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!

LMAO! Are these people for real?

#17020

What we need is a code of conduct for jakeys (nothing personal Phil).

#17021

ReneeHendricks wrote: Wow. Ok, yeah, I don't want to see someone masturbating in public while on my way to work either.

Oh I agree, I wouldn't want to see it either. But my point was...

However, it seems very, very hypocritical of Jennifer McCreight to be so full of disdain considering she suffers from depression - a *mental illness*. Many homeless suffer from mental illness. I wonder why it didn't occur to this "social warrior" to find a way to help this man???

Indeed. All she saw was a filthy disgusting object, not a man in need of help. She probably thought he was exercising his male privilege in addition to his Hobo Willy.

#17022

Obviously, Jen never heard of getting the cops and accusing the stinky hobo of indecent exposure. That would have give him the hobo a roof and free meals = activism.

#17023

Guest wrote: LMAO! Are these people for real?

Unfortunately, yes.

#17024

Gumby wrote:
Saint N. wrote: How does she know they're masturbating to her? Maybe they're just masturbating as she happens to walk-by. It's not like they have a home to go to and jerk off. Note, I'm not making excuses for public masturbation, I'm just saying don't flatter yourself too much Jen, cuz a couple of hobos have masturbated near me too, and I doubt they were checking me out.
To be fair, she never said specifically that the homeless man was wanking to her - I think you may have misread that middle tweet.

I wonder if that homeless man went to the library later and tweeted:

"Apparently my day is going to start by trying to squeeze one out in private only to have some saggy skank stop and stare at me."

I bet he wasn't even wanking. He probably thought a horse had trotted by and was rooting for a sugarcube.

#17025

Obviously the problem is that whatever city is unfortunate enough to host dear Jenny (don't know and can't be arsed to care) doesn't have a well-thought-out Code of ConductÂ® to keep this sort of harassment from occurring.

#17026

real horrorshow wrote:Too late! In a pre-emptive strike the A+theists may have decided (haven't read it all yet) that they don't need atheism!
To which my response would be: "Good, can the grown ups have it back now?"

Julian (who started the thread) claims he was joking, http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 826#p27343

Gumby wrote:
To be fair, she never said specifically that the homeless man was wanking to her - I think you may have misread that middle tweet.

I wonder if that homeless man went to the library later and tweeted:

"Apparently my day is going to start by trying to squeeze one out in private only to have some saggy skank stop and stare at me."

I assumed from the first tweet where she claims that the guy is watching her while jacking, that he must be wanking to her. Not trying to jump to undue conclusions, I just figured it was implied.

#17027

Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.

I gotta go buy a few kgs of popcorn... this will be spectacular.

Sad thing though, if this is true, then it'll give some legitimacy to the "WE'RE UNDER CONSTANT ATTACK FROM THE TROLLS!!! (hence we are allowed to act like paranoid crackpots)", and I'm guessing people like Matt is going to jump on the opportunity to re-spin his banning in a more A+ positive light when this hits the fan. The fact that these people gave moderator rights to a poe, that fit right in besides the rest of the crazies, will be completely ignored.

Still, the sheer paranoia this will induce in the already paranoid A+ers will be a huge blow, now not only are all those new guys asking some innocent questions and not agreeing 100% from the start probably enemies, now even that new guy that joins the dogpile and totes the party line like a true believer might be the worst troll of all. "SchrÃ¶dingers Troll" will leave these people paralyzed, unable to trust any new members, or even old ones.

ps. If the poe is Flewellyn, then that puts Dillahuntygate in a completely new light, since he's been the mod that's really been driving that trainwreck. Piegasm though, was the mod that banned the rape-victim iirc.

#17028

Angry_Drunk wrote:Obviously the problem is that whatever city is unfortunate enough to host dear Jenny (don't know and can't be arsed to care) doesn't have a well-thought-out Code of ConductÂ® to keep this sort of harassment from occurring.

She lives in Seattle. Oh, does that mean according to SurlyLogic I just doxxed her, even though that is common knowledge and also the headline on her twitter account?

http://i48.tinypic.com/4qlbo2.jpg

#17029

Come on, I can't believe you aren't taking this seriously. Nobody should have to see something that disgusting in a public place. I bet it put him off his stroke.

#17030

That homeless bastard was commiting a thought crime.

How disgusting, you think he would consider the feelings of the underprivleged jens of this world as they pass by, and remove himself from sight. Jen doesnt need to be harassed like this, she already has enough on her plate to deal with. She had important things to work out in her head, really really important social justice issues for the oppressed of this society, that she needed to think hard about, so she could get into activist mode again and endure the laptop coal face of making a difference.

#17031

acathode wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:OK, here it is. I think I've wiped any names that would get him in trouble.
My friend, who forwarded this, says he recieved the email last Friday.
I was in contact with him today and mentioned something from this site and he immediately said I "had to see this".
I don't know the mod in question, his real-life name isn't familiar to me, but my friend says he's known him for years.
I gotta go buy a few kgs of popcorn... this will be spectacular.

Sad thing though, if this is true, then it'll give some legitimacy to the "WE'RE UNDER CONSTANT ATTACK FROM THE TROLLS!!! (hence we are allowed to act like paranoid crackpots)"

Maybe but the fact that they thought a Poe was worthy of being a moderator and worked undiscovered so long is proof of how crazy their worldview actually is. The Poe says they were trying to be ludicrous but the actual mods and members outdid him/her at every turn.

#17032

Tony Parsehole wrote: I bet he wasn't even wanking. He probably thought a horse had trotted by and was rooting for a sugarcube.

http://instantrimshot.com/index.php?sou ... &play=true

#17033

bhoytony wrote:Come on, I can't believe you aren't taking this seriously. Nobody should have to see something that disgusting in a public place. I bet it put him off his stroke.

Maybe her first tweet had a typo...

What she really meant was:

Apparently my day is going to start by wanking by a homeless man, masturbating in public #ugh

#17034

Tony Parsehole wrote:I bet he wasn't even wanking. He probably thought a horse had trotted by and was rooting for a sugarcube.

You're killing me! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

#17035

Angry_Drunk wrote:Obviously the problem is that whatever city is unfortunate enough to host dear Jenny (don't know and can't be arsed to care) doesn't have a well-thought-out Code of ConductÂ® to keep this sort of harassment from occurring.

Seattle. I know this because I also live here, and try to make of the local nutjobs to avoid.

#17036

Also, I need to get used to double-checking my posts instead of editing later because I have a terrible habit of making typos and leaving out words.

#17037

bhoytony wrote:Come on, I can't believe you aren't taking this seriously. Nobody should have to see something that disgusting in a public place. I bet it put him off his stroke.

Hahhahahahhhaahhahhhahahahhahhahahaha

#17038

Gumby wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote: Wow. Ok, yeah, I don't want to see someone masturbating in public while on my way to work either.
Oh I agree, I wouldn't want to see it either. But my point was...

However, it seems very, very hypocritical of Jennifer McCreight to be so full of disdain considering she suffers from depression - a *mental illness*. Many homeless suffer from mental illness. I wonder why it didn't occur to this "social warrior" to find a way to help this man???
Indeed. All she saw was a filthy disgusting object, not a man in need of help. She probably thought he was exercising his male privilege in addition to his Hobo Willy.

It's because of this crap I find the whole "we're social warriors" line of bullshit coming from AtheismPlus (and their "leaders", proponents, silent partners, whatever the fuck they're calling themselves) maddening.

#17039

Tony Parsehole wrote:Maybe but the fact that they thought a Poe was worthy of being a moderator and worked undiscovered so long is proof of how crazy their worldview actually is. The Poe says they were trying to be ludicrous but the actual mods and members outdid him/her at every turn.

Yes, it's so hilarious, very telling, and just so damn sad, all at the same thing. Unfortunately I think this will be ignored by a lot of people that are "in the middle" or undecided about the whole thing, if nothing else the A+ers will make damn sure that nothing else but their wailing and gnashing of their teeth is heard, when they lament how EVIL the trolls are!

Is it strange that they sometimes overreact when we now can see the lengths the MISOGYNIST TROLLS are willing to go just to DESTROY and HARASS their righetou... you get the idea.

#17040

Saint N. wrote:It should be noted that Carrier has done a good job keeping his mouth shut since his initial word-vomit.

Not in the least bit true.
He imperiously replied to an accurate calm poster just this morning.
(And keeps responding on his comment threads. I have that thread on RSS feed, and regularly have to clear a handful of posts. From others: exclusively sanely critical, from Dick Carrier: exclusively sociopathic & imperiously infantile.)

He flat-out refuses to accept any blame, and deflects his detractors using the same crude & illogical primary-school tricks that ordinary humans abandon after they turn 12.