Karmakin wrote:
The fundamental lack of understanding of the political landscape of the whole is really the big failure in terms of the political discourse right now, especially when understanding authoritarianism vs. anti-authoritarianism beliefs.
You have four quadrants. There's the top-left, which is the communists at the extreme and the "New Progressives" at the not so extreme, you have the top-right which has all sorts of traditionalism, the bottom right which is big L Libertarianism and Capitalist Anarchy at the extreme, and you have the bottom left, where I put my own politics, which has anarchism as the extreme.
This is much more accurate than the traditional American political spectrum frame which has communism at one end and libertarianism at the other.
The big problem is much of the left moving up on the political spectrum, moving away from people who value individual liberty and fair dealing (those things IMO are crucially related). Because of that, the bottom left hand corner has little to no actual political representation right now. No politicians, no think tanks, relatively little in the way of having our own news and opinion sources. Probably just a few bloggers and vloggers and podcasters.
In order to move forward, IMO, I do think that this more accurate political landscape needs to be popularized. Even if people don't agree with it, having the anti-authoritarian left certainly acts as IMO the best balance to the authoritarian left.
I very much agree with this.
I've wondered a lot about how we have gotten to this point, and I look at the gradual march of authoritarian ideas into my own friend-o-sphere of musicians and art/design types.
I think what has been happening at a deep level in these respective worlds is reflective of how capital has segued away from them. People operating in these spheres of activity have seen their ability to earn a living get hollowed out over the last 15 years. There are lots of reasons this has happened, from the democratisation-via-piracy of design software making ability (with say, photoshop) very common, to people with a decent level of competence having to compete with the entire world (a prime localised example would be newspapers- traditionally a standard entry-level employer for design skills- being mostly outsourced to India now).
The huge increase of university attendance under New Labour also looms large in this.
All these factors coalesce in the popular imagination of my peers to form a narrative about how we are the victims of late capitalism, denied our ability to use our precious skills and also denied the affirmation of success.
Now obviously I know this world view is deeply entitled and also naive bullshit, but it is
INCREDIBLY common amongst everyone I know. This kind of long-scale resentment makes everyone ripe to be brought into a dogma, and in my opinion this is exactly what I have seen happen.
The reason I flag this as relevant/important to the above quote is because I think that a
substantial reason why libertarian-left voices are not getting heard is because they tend to focus on why authoritarianism is wrong, but actually don't speak to the emotive situations that have driven people to those stances in the first place. It's the same kind of process as centre-right people moving more far right because the centre won't talk about immigration.
I see more and more of my companions take up literal communism ideals. Not good.