free thoughtpolice wrote:After getting spanked at Anjuli Pandaver's blog, Gilliel retreats to the pillowfort to complain:
giliell
March 20, 2016 at 10:19 am
259
Alexander
Urgh, wishing the best for the job. I suppose the boss would duck into the office when talking positively about you as well…
+++
Well, take a look at this blog, the thread about refugees. Actually I thought she was just honestly mistaken about the “organised mass rape” thingy, because she wouldn’t be the first person I’ve seen, but the reaction to me asking for a source and the dismissal of facts is quite telling.
linky:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/anjuli/2016 ... -migrants/
Also a bonus, comments by
AboringRobot Oaring About.
The reaction is indeed pretty telling. Anjuli replied to Giliell with a source.
Giliell dismissed it and engaged in some grade-A minimization and deflection: it's not "organized mass rapes/sexual assaults" but only disorganized and individual sexual assaults to distract women while the migrants stole their wallets. This is a common minimization of the incidents in Cologne and elsewhere (note that Giliell fails to address the fact that the incident of Cologne wasn't an isolated case).
Giliell believes that the real people who are really at fault are (who else?) the German authorities, but not because they didn't stop the sexual assaults, but because they're part of the "German rape culture" by not punishing groping hard enough. The poor, disfranchised Muslims have just exploited the weak German laws to acquire some iPhones to sell to support their poor, disfranchised stay in the capitalist Germany.
This just isn't true. There have been cases of
mass sexual assaults in Hamburg, Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Dortmund, Düsseldorf and Bielefeld. Up to 1,000 men have been involved in Cologne alone. Similar attacks were reported in Austria, Finland and Switzerland, always involving refugees or immigrants from countries with a Muslim majority.
Giliell also ignores the fact that mass sexual assaults are a tool frequently encouraged and used by Islamists (for example in Cairo at the Tahir Square) as part of a
real rape culture inspired and supported by the preaching of traditional Muslim values (like the idea that women are to blame for the assaults if they weren't veiled).
There are many factors leading to this view of women in our communities. One of the factors is that a man is infallible to shame or any of the negative consequences of a relationship between a man and a women that is not officiated by marriage; in these cases the women is believed to be despicable and has consented to be put in this situation, while he is of sound morals.
This catastrophic thinking has resulted in religious insanity that says girls should be taught their place in the streets and public spaces, to push them into donning the veil and push them out of the public sphere. Their rationale is that if women feel safe on the streets, they will be tempted to commit the sin of immodesty. By that virtue, harassment becomes a noble religious goal.
Giliell denies that the assaults were organized and claims that the investigations of the German police have found no evidence for any organization whatsoever. However the police didn't say that.
Jürgen Mathies, the new chief of police of Cologne
stated (in German) that:
[Some perpetrators had made appointments for celebrations on New Year's Eve] on the social media. Some of them said there: 'We go to Cologne, there will be a big party.' There is no evidence that we are dealing with structures of organized crime. It is rather the case that the phenomenon of such sexual assaults out of groups is a massive problem in Cairo for example. The perpetrators probably knew from their home countries the behavior that women are encircled by many men at the same time and then abused. However, I did not know about this phenomenon in Germany so far.
The police has found no evidence of the involvement of
organized crime, but has found evidence of more or less spontaneous organization from groups on social media, based on cultural attitudes. Giliell either doesn't know or deliberately ignores this important piece of information.
Gilliel and other
dhimmis minimize the impact of Islam on the perception of women in the culture of Muslim men, especially in the last few years when
Islamist "scholars" argue that rape of non-Muslim women can be justified.
The female prisoners of wars are 'those whom you own.' In order to humiliate them, they become the property of the army commander, or of a Muslim, and he can have sex with them just like he has sex with his wives.
These words don't come from an ISIS leader, but from a female scholar and so-called "moderate Islamist" who teavhed the university of Al-Azhar in Cairo (who said what is quoted in the contest of a war against Israel).
Rape of non-Muslim women is a tool of Islamist preaching. The "superiority" of Islam is supported by the "purity" of Muslim women,when compared to the "degenerate" West. To say that Islamism and the cultural attitudes it inspires have nothing to do with what happened this New Year's Eve is disingenuous at best and willingly blind at worst.
