Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

Old subthreads
dogen
.
.
Posts: 2581
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#241

Post by dogen »

Southern wrote:See you depraved fuckers tomorrow, with some lulz coming from Stollznov side. I hope she gets something good tomorrow, maybe a video of Radford groping her or a bona-fide notarized document thingee from a trusted source. She has to. I need it to see this getting even better, since Shermer x Peezee was such a dud.
Why, where are you going? And, incidentally, why are you never seen in the same room as the Midnight Marauder?

:o

rpguest

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#242

Post by rpguest »

i am more convinced than ever that they are all in it together, to teach the overall community what it means to be skeptical, while running off with hundreds of thousands of donated yacht-buying dollars to have ravishing, empowering threeway makeouts on the riviera

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#243

Post by Aneris »

Ape+lust wrote:Her Indiegogo is up over $500, plus whatever Dana Hunter contributed, in the past hour. Beliebers gonna beliebe harder.

[.img]http://imgur.com/hYdu05L.png[/img]

They have made an emotional and finacial investment. Now various biases kick in, and after an disappointment there is now the classic Cognitive Dissonance effect visible, as Leon Festinger described it with the disappointed Seeker cult. See it like witnessing a solar eclipse.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6370
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#244

Post by Really? »

Hey, assholes. Stop using public communication venues to communicate with this person who communicates on public communication venues.

78
Corvus Whiteneck

2 April 2014 at 10:23 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment

Some pitclown tweeted at me referencing something I posted on FTB. No big deal, one tweet in my notifications, whatever.

But consider, this is who we are dealing with: losers who will google (or other search-engine) a blog-commenter pseudonym, and then tweet at a similar twitter handle(s)… because reasons.

And I don’t even have a name or avatar that is obviously female. Jeebus help me if I did.

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#245

Post by Sunder »

Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85

Just read it.

Sulman
.
.
Posts: 2032
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#246

Post by Sulman »

I'd be careful making assumptions about anyone's mental state, let alone diagnosis. They might all be completely nuts (everyone's seen people like that at some point, right) or they might all be a bunch of conniving bastards. There's no way of telling, especially in love triangles.

Likewise all of the evidence outside of the police stuff might be total balls. There's no way of knowing at this point.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#247

Post by Lsuoma »

Sunder wrote:Anyone catch PZ libeling Ben's lawyer?
Ben's lawyer? Please please please!

(Although, it shouldn't be possible in law to libel a lawyer...)

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 3950
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#248

Post by Pitchguest »

Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Cherry picked, massaged, out-of-context, and irrelevant "evidence" does not a case make...
The guy doesn't know what irony is, apparently.

Also, how is the claim of Stollznow falsifying the dates of emails to make her case more solid irrelevant?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#249

Post by James Caruthers »

Sunder wrote:Anyone catch PZ libeling Ben's lawyer?
He's just establishing the FTB party line in case Stollznow loses or settles in a way that has her apologizing publicly.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#250

Post by Steersman »

Really? wrote: <snip>
Steersman wrote:
dogen wrote: <snip>
If I ran across Ogvorbis, I would put the car in reverse just to make sure.
Bit of a cheap shot. Assuming, at a very long stretch, that he isn't trolling the hell out of everyone one there, the most charitable interpretation is that he was both victim and victimizer, and that the former may have had some significant contributions to the latter. I wonder how much moral sense we all had at that age - I certainly know that mine was notably deficient - and how traumatic experiences might have diminished that even further.
Point taken, but if you tell us that you raped a couple little girls while knowing it's wrong, I'm not going to offer you pouncetugs and babysitting offers. I'm going to urge you to tell the authorities so the grown victims could receive the attention and closure they need.
True enough. But then the target should be the supposed "enablers" or condoners, rather than the victim/victimizer.

Although I wonder at the efficacy of "telling the authorities"; reminds me of Jason Bourne tracking down the Russian woman whose parents he had killed to apologize - "truth and reconciliation" seems to be more effective than draconian punishment. But maybe that was what you were getting at.

dogen
.
.
Posts: 2581
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#251

Post by dogen »

Sunder wrote:Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85

Just read it.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#252

Post by James Caruthers »

Sunder wrote:Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85

Just read it.
The kettle has long since gone past the point of accusing the pot of being a Person of Color, and is now furiously erecting a cross to burn on Mr. Pot's lawn.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#253

Post by Mykeru »

Really? wrote:
Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Shit, dude. If he's talking, try to pry as much info as you can out of him. Honey, not vinegar.

We need to help him get out of this abusive relationship with a woman who clearly has BPD and a history of domestic violence. He's just going to keep defending her because that's what DV victims do...until they get killed by their abusers, of course.
I don't do honey. We need the good cop
Boring conversation anyway

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#254

Post by Aneris »

Keep in mind, when this doesn't go well for Karen, then it surely was Teh Patriarchyâ„¢

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#255

Post by Sunder »

Print it and frame it:

http://i.imgur.com/iYGck6g.jpg

JacquesCuze
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:32 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#256

Post by JacquesCuze »

Use the command below from a windows cygwin shell to get a local copy of radford's website on your disk so that you can browse it locally. That means it converts the original network URLs to local file URLs.
wget -e robots=off --wait 1 -rkp -l6 -np -nH -N http://benrlegal.info/
If you would like a mirror of the site that can be rehosted you can try the almost identical command line
wget -e robots=off --wait 1 -rp -l6 -np -nH -N http://benrlegal.info/
If you are on Windows and don't have cygwin installed, you can install cygwin and then ask cygwin to install wget and then use the above commands. Linux and mac users should be able to use the same commands as above, but this was tested on Windows.

If there is interest and someone knows a good site to place it, I can upload a zip file of the site as I have mirrored it.

wget tells me there are 101 files, 32M.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#257

Post by Mykeru »

Aneris wrote:Keep in mind, when this doesn't go well for Karen, then it surely was Teh Patriarchyâ„¢
Seriously, someone get in there and play good cop on Baxter. I couldn't pretend to be nice to the guy if you put my balls in a vise.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6370
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#258

Post by Really? »

Sunder wrote:Print it and frame it:

http://i.imgur.com/iYGck6g.jpg
Yes, this is funny. The sad part is that I'm going to bet that this is PZ jumping the shark. The lulz will diminish in quality from this moment on... =(


Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#260

Post by Spike13 »

Steersman wrote:
dogen wrote:
Clarence wrote: <snip>
Well, Stollznow is a 'name' skeptic, whereas , except for the pit, I'd have never heard of Ogvorbis and if I ran across him from reading the occasional linked thread or something I'd have no clue he had ever claimed to have been sexually assaulted or claimed to have raped someone.
If I ran across Ogvorbis, I would put the car in reverse just to make sure.
Bit of a cheap shot. Assuming, at a very long stretch, that he isn't trolling the hell out of everyone one there, the most charitable interpretation is that he was both victim and victimizer, and that the former may have had some significant contributions to the latter. I wonder how much moral sense we all had at that age - I certainly know that mine was notably deficient - and how traumatic experiences might have diminished that even further.
Excellent points steers,
I think that the ogvorbis/rapist meme gets lost in that he admits being victim/ assailant at a young age.
He is accepted and is an honored member of the SJW
The irony is that the posters here(as far as I know) have committed no such act, yet are painted as monsters because they do not go along with the males are always wrong narrative.

Being a victim of childhood rape, if my abusers' had had influence over me, we'll who knows? I would like to think that I would not have carried on the cycle so to speak.

Please, no pity points. If I got bit by a snake, I would not expect pounce hugs. That is what it was. Same as a mugging. I'm well past over it.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 13204
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#261

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Really? wrote:
Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.

We need to help him get out of this abusive relationship with a woman who clearly has BPD and a history of domestic violence. He's just going to keep defending her because that's what DV victims do...until they get killed by their abusers, of course.
As someone who himself was married to a crazy* person, i can say that you get dragged down into their craziness, and end up constantly defending and shielding their terrible behavior from the outside world without even realizing it.

So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.



* As in committed-to-a-mental-hospital crazy.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#262

Post by deLurch »

EdwardGemmer wrote:The Radford/Stollsnow post coitus selfie just begs for a pit Photoshop
What? You mean the 'Good Morning Baxter' shot?

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#263

Post by Gefan »

Should Karen soon be forced to defend herself from Baxter via the Jodi Arias method (TM) I put the over-under on incoming "baboon bucks" at a hundred grand.

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#264

Post by Spike13 »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:You know those old saws that your grandparents, great-grandparents, etc. would quote and you'd go :roll: ? Like A fool and hir money are soon parted? Well ...
Dana Hunter
2 April 2014 at 9:27 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Gave this month’s earnings, and as long as my financial situation doesn’t tank horribly, I intend to continue donating until Radford has been utterly and completely crushed by Karen’s lawyer. I’m sick of this shit. I’m sick of these jackasses. Time to send them a clear and unforgettable message regarding our unwillingness to allow them to continue preying on people without consequence.

I hope Karen’s found the best in the business, someone who savors a tall glass of defeated harasser tears each morning.
Dana Hunter might as well don the black sweats, tie up the white Nike's, and wait for the alien spaceship.

This is how cult members respond.
Nice! A heavens gate reference! I remember reading that some folks responded to that by sating
" makes you wonder if a bunch of bright young people did that they might have known something."
No, no they didn't.
They wasted they previous gift of life they were given.

Guestus Aurelius
.
.
Posts: 2118
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#265

Post by Guestus Aurelius »

I cannot believe that Baxter is still responding to Mykeru.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#266

Post by deLurch »

Yes, all of the evidence pz said he refused to look at. As he said, he no longer considers himself a skeptic.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#267

Post by deLurch »

JacquesCuze wrote:It certainly doesn't help Stollznow for PZ to tweet all her dox are out.
SSShhhhhh.....

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#268

Post by JackSkeptic »

free thoughtpolice wrote:Dana Hunter

2 April 2014 at 9:27 pm (UTC -5)

Gave this month’s earnings, and as long as my financial situation doesn’t tank horribly, I intend to continue donating until Radford has been utterly and completely crushed by Karen’s lawyer. I’m sick of this shit. I’m sick of these jackasses. Time to send them a clear and unforgettable message regarding our unwillingness to allow them to continue preying on people without consequence.

I hope Karen’s found the best in the business, someone who savors a tall glass of defeated harasser tears each morning.
They really get off on hate don't they. It does not matter who they hurt, including those they claim to support. It does not matter about evidence, just absolute belief with no questions allowed. I hope both parties have sufficient funds to defend themselves. These people's hate is what makes them so poisonous and totally at odds with the 'Justice' they so laughably claim to support.

JacquesCuze
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:32 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#269

Post by JacquesCuze »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg

He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".

Old_ones
.
.
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:46 pm
Location: An hour's drive from Hell.
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#270

Post by Old_ones »

Hurin wrote:Nerd of Dedhead
Citation need, or you lie and bullshit. Nothing anybody says in defense of BR without evidence is dismissed. Scum is rotting….
Radford posted documentation of his claims which PZ won’t allow linking to. Interesting, that. I’m sure it has nothing at all to do with the fact that PZ picked a side before he had any awareness of what evidence might be out there.

On an unrelated note, you are the most inane thing on the internet. Are you capable of writing a sentence that isn’t the same idiotic garble you wrote in the last 8000 comments? I can make every comment you’ve written in the last 2 years out of some combination the following:

Citation needed. liar and bullshitter. OPINION!!!! Citation needed. Scum MRA opinion bullshitter! Liberturd! MEpinon!!

If you can’t manage anything better than that then you should shut up, because your writing is an affront to the English language, and human communication in general.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-777241

Someone had to do it.

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#271

Post by Sunder »

This comment won't survive.

http://i.imgur.com/nrSUiDF.jpg

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#272

Post by Spike13 »

deLurch wrote:
Yes, all of the evidence pz said he refused to look at. As he said, he no longer considers himself a skeptic.
BOOM! The hammer of truth come down!

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#273

Post by deLurch »

Steersman wrote:Indeed. As for "shitty behaviour", one might argue that Stollznow was first guilty of using the "mustard gas" of making public accusations on virtually no evidence, and that neither she nor her supporters have much of a leg to stand on if the tables are turned - particularly if her charges are looking a lot less credible than his counter-charges. Sow the wind and all that.
I concur. Once you start hurling around accusations of sexual assault and harassment, a person has every right to respond with evidence.

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#274

Post by Spike13 »

Old_ones wrote:
Hurin wrote:Nerd of Dedhead
Citation need, or you lie and bullshit. Nothing anybody says in defense of BR without evidence is dismissed. Scum is rotting….
Radford posted documentation of his claims which PZ won’t allow linking to. Interesting, that. I’m sure it has nothing at all to do with the fact that PZ picked a side before he had any awareness of what evidence might be out there.

On an unrelated note, you are the most inane thing on the internet. Are you capable of writing a sentence that isn’t the same idiotic garble you wrote in the last 8000 comments? I can make every comment you’ve written in the last 2 years out of some combination the following:

Citation needed. liar and bullshitter. OPINION!!!! Citation needed. Scum MRA opinion bullshitter! Liberturd! MEpinon!!

If you can’t manage anything better than that then you should shut up, because your writing is an affront to the English language, and human communication in general.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-777241

Someone had to do it.
As a former affront to he English language, I give my full support to this statement.

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#275

Post by Gefan »

Mykeru wrote: I don't do honey. We need the good cop
What?

No good?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#276

Post by James Caruthers »

Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.

His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#277

Post by deLurch »

TiBo wrote:Oh boy, I hope IndieGogo has a refund policy. :lol:
Nope.
http://support.indiegogo.com/hc/en-us/a ... 76-Refunds

But I wonder would indigogo would do about fraudulently obtained funds. Indigogo already has a policy against fund raisers that cause harm to individuals. Karen's claims which according to Ben are unfounded defamation would suggest that Indigogo would want to have it taken down.

Guestus Aurelius
.
.
Posts: 2118
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#278

Post by Guestus Aurelius »

Yes, I could definitely see how copying and pasting and forwarding e-mails multiple times might result in all the dates being exactly right except for the years, which now coincidentally match (rather than contradict) the timeline of the harassment accusations. And surely all that is completely unrelated to the excerpts' in question having been removed from their original (harmless) context.

:bjarte:

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#279

Post by Spike13 »

James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.

His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger

Quiz
.
.
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#280

Post by Quiz »

Sitting back and enjoying Mykeru tweeting to Batxtor :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#281

Post by deLurch »

Clarence wrote:If this evidence holds up, this will follow Stollznow EVERYWHERE in the wider skeptic community, and, depending, she might even get dropped as a 'liability' by the SJW's - though most of them seem so deluded I suspect she'll always have some support from some of them.
If conference organizers determined that she lied to them and fabricated evidence by back dating emails in order to attempt to get Ben Radford black listed from their events, I wonder if they will wash their hands of her.

Tapir
.
.
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:59 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#282

Post by Tapir »

http://i.imgur.com/cmunl0h.jpg

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Honestly, all three of them sound fucking mental.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#283

Post by James Caruthers »

JacquesCuze wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg

He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".
He's probably just a Nice Guy, and he was busy being a Nice Guy and got upset when he thought he had hurt the kitten. Which Karen of course abused by peeping his laptop.

Baxter may very well be a genuinely kind soul, but he sounds like a sucker on twitter when he describes how Karen "cut and pasted" emails to him. And after all the lying he claims to have witnessed from her end, he still believes that she is being honest about this shit.

I just have to say, any woman who snoops my laptop is out the door. It's usually a good sign of nutso instability.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#284

Post by deLurch »

James Caruthers wrote:Forget Shermer, if this is the standard FTB response, I bet Karen is also fapping, just imagining the huge piles of cash she'll be able to milk out of this newest moral outrage.
That is my thought. You can't stop the freight train of stupid that fast. He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#285

Post by James Caruthers »

Spike13 wrote:
James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.

His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger
Me too.

He was curiously silent on the whole Schism thing, but I think he's finally seeing the writing on the wall. For a guy who made a youtube career out of challenging ideas openly in a public forum (youtube), what the SJWs are trying to accomplish is the ideological opposite of his own approach.

But hey, you also don't have to be Einstein to see how transparently racist and sexist someone like Suey Park is.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#286

Post by Mykeru »

Gefan wrote:
Mykeru wrote: I don't do honey. We need the good cop
What?

No good?
Now that was funny. And Bax took it in stride. Like he was resigned.
http://www.marieclaire.com/cm/marieclai ... abbit1.jpg

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#287

Post by Sunder »

deLurch wrote:He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.
If he's confident he can win then provoking them into donating further just means she has more money they can go after for damages.

Also, Hurin's comment got disappeared.

JacquesCuze
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:32 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#288

Post by JacquesCuze »

Guestus Aurelius wrote: Yes, I could definitely see how copying and pasting and forwarding e-mails multiple times might result in all the dates being exactly right except for the years, which now coincidentally match (rather than contradict) the timeline of the harassment accusations. And surely all that is completely unrelated to the excerpts' in question having been removed from their original (harmless) context.

:bjarte:
Related:

In the comments at PeeZus' the claim is made that Google, (or any third party) would turn over server logs to lawyers in a civil suit.

http://i.imgur.com/W8vKd26.jpg

Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?

What in law or the Constitution enables that?

Selenite
.
.
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:45 am
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#289

Post by Selenite »

deLurch wrote:
Clarence wrote:If this evidence holds up, this will follow Stollznow EVERYWHERE in the wider skeptic community, and, depending, she might even get dropped as a 'liability' by the SJW's - though most of them seem so deluded I suspect she'll always have some support from some of them.
If conference organizers determined that she lied to them and fabricated evidence by back dating emails in order to attempt to get Ben Radford black listed from their events, I wonder if they will wash their hands of her.
I'm wondering if the blowback will hit PZ, too. At this point, he's pretty much admitted to knowing that allegatoins were based on false/forged information and hiding that.

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#290

Post by BarnOwl »

PZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 10:20 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Don’t get cocky. Apparently, Radford’s lawyer has a bit of a reputation as a rabid dog…there’s been some difficulty getting representation because everyone hates to go up against him and deal with the slime. Doing a public data dump to poison the well sounds like exactly the kind of thing this guy would do to win, win, win.

You can also tell what their court case would be. “She’s a slut, she’s mean and vindictive, so she deserves to be punished.” And there are many people who will fall for that.
True dat - there are many people who fall for mean and vindictive sluts.

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#291

Post by Spike13 »

James Caruthers wrote:
JacquesCuze wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg

He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".
He's probably just a Nice Guy, and he was busy being a Nice Guy and got upset when he thought he had hurt the kitten. Which Karen of course abused by peeping his laptop.

Baxter may very well be a genuinely kind soul, but he sounds like a sucker on twitter when he describes how Karen "cut and pasted" emails to him. And after all the lying he claims to have witnessed from her end, he still believes that she is being honest about this shit.

I just have to say, any woman who snoops my laptop is out the door. It's usually a good sign of nutso instability.
YES!!!
When I was married I wouldn't go into my wife's purse without permission.
Privacy is a mark of trust. Abuse it at your cost!

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#292

Post by deLurch »

Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Baxter doesn't need abuse.

He needs to be told to wise up, review the evidence with friends and run before his head is on the next chopping block.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#293

Post by Lsuoma »

deLurch wrote:
James Caruthers wrote:Forget Shermer, if this is the standard FTB response, I bet Karen is also fapping, just imagining the huge piles of cash she'll be able to milk out of this newest moral outrage.
That is my thought. You can't stop the freight train of stupid that fast. He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.
Which may mean he has more to collect from her if he wins. If she's raised $100K by the time this goes to trial and then says she's poor as a church mouse and can't account for where her six figures have gone?

The attorneys might clean her out (D&C?), but I don't see how this can hurt Radders if he has an attorney working on contingency.

Plus she's guilty as fuck on the face of it - *SHE'S AUSTRALIAN*

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#294

Post by Aneris »

Spike13 wrote:
James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.

His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger
What does it even mean, he “confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist”?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#295

Post by James Caruthers »

The only person who really loses on this one is Baxter. He looks like a chump to the pro-Radford side, and the pro-Stollznow side will notice upon reading the police report information that Baxter accused their goddess of Domestic Violence.

Some day, men will learn to stop simping for insane, vindictive BPD women. But not today.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#296

Post by Lsuoma »

JacquesCuze wrote: In the comments at PeeZus' the claim is made that Google, (or any third party) would turn over server logs to lawyers in a civil suit.

http://i.imgur.com/W8vKd26.jpg

Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?

What in law or the Constitution enables that?
Marcus Ranum is completely full of shit. He's talking out his arse.

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#297

Post by Sunder »

JacquesCuze wrote:Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?

What in law or the Constitution enables that?
I'm not a legal expert, but to my knowledge yes, that's standard practice with subpeonas. The court can either order you to appear and give testimony or to provide documents and material evidence.

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#298

Post by BarnOwl »

Tapir wrote:http://i.imgur.com/cmunl0h.jpg

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Honestly, all three of them sound fucking mental.
[youtube]foMQX9ZExsE[/youtube]

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#299

Post by Gefan »

JacquesCuze wrote: It certainly doesn't help Stollznow for PZ to tweet all her dox are out.
Well, it helps the Hostage Rescue Team find the house, I guess.

Spike13
.
.
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:40 pm
Location: Dirty Jersey, on the Chemical Coast
Contact:

Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?

#300

Post by Spike13 »

BarnOwl wrote:
PZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 10:20 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Don’t get cocky. Apparently, Radford’s lawyer has a bit of a reputation as a rabid dog…there’s been some difficulty getting representation because everyone hates to go up against him and deal with the slime. Doing a public data dump to poison the well sounds like exactly the kind of thing this guy would do to win, win, win.

You can also tell what their court case would be. “She’s a slut, she’s mean and vindictive, so she deserves to be punished.” And there are many people who will fall for that.
True dat - there are many people who fall for mean and vindictive sluts.

Mean and vindictive sluts you say?..hmmmm..got any phone numbers?..

Locked