Steersman wrote:dogen wrote:Clarence wrote:
<snip>
Well, Stollznow is a 'name' skeptic, whereas , except for the pit, I'd have never heard of Ogvorbis and if I ran across him from reading the occasional linked thread or something I'd have no clue he had ever claimed to have been sexually assaulted or claimed to have raped someone.
If I ran across Ogvorbis, I would put the car in reverse just to make sure.
Bit of a cheap shot. Assuming, at a very long stretch, that he isn't trolling the hell out of everyone one there, the most charitable interpretation is that he was both victim and victimizer, and that the former may have had some significant contributions to the latter. I wonder how much moral sense we all had at that age - I certainly know that mine was notably deficient - and how traumatic experiences might have diminished that even further.
Excellent points steers,
I think that the ogvorbis/rapist meme gets lost in that he admits being victim/ assailant at a young age.
He is accepted and is an honored member of the SJW
The irony is that the posters here(as far as I know) have committed no such act, yet are painted as monsters because they do not go along with the males are always wrong narrative.
Being a victim of childhood rape, if my abusers' had had influence over me, we'll who knows? I would like to think that I would not have carried on the cycle so to speak.
Please, no pity points. If I got bit by a snake, I would not expect pounce hugs. That is what it was. Same as a mugging. I'm well past over it.