I sent Natalie some chump change. Not much, but enough for a meal. Maybe enough to improve her situation for another day. At the very least, I hope she appreciates the gesture.
Anyway, I don't think we should count somegreybloke just yet, as a couple of hours ago, he said this,https://twitter.com/somegreybloke/statu ... 4847691776
@MelodyHensley @rebeccawatson Oh fuck, Justin Vacula RT'd something I said last night - so clearly I was in the wrong. Sorry.
And this,https://twitter.com/somegreybloke/statu ... 7808865281
@rebeccawatson @MelodyHensley Annoys me that you can't disagree with people on here without some tosser spinning it for their own agenda.
Note how the hipsters follow suit and how greybloke doubles down and implies the "tossers" are spinning it for "their own agenda." Who might the "tosser" be in this case? Justin? I'm not sure a retweet counts, but what I do know. In any case, shouldn't a self-proclaimed SWJ and feminist refrain from using the word "tosser" considering its etymology?
Granted the word "cunt" in the UK is no more gendered than "asshole", but I suppose if we're to take their rules into consideration, "tosser" (which has the meaning "unpleasant person") actually comes from the term "toss off" or masturbate. Much like how "wanker" would be a gendered term for men, "tosser" would count in that category as well, I imagine, so therefore, with that logic, shouldn't that word be off-limits? Or am I just overthinking it? Then again, not like they abide by their own rules anyway.
(Just for the record, I don't really believe somegreybloke should change his writing to appease us. Writing it out, I realised just how ridiculous it is, which made me wonder just how mental the people who think like this every day and mean it
must be. It's nonsense, but for the sake of argument, it's nonsense that they believe in.
They take this seriously. I fear for the future of the human race.)