Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
AchronTimeless
.
.
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Somewhere out of my mind

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39061

Post by AchronTimeless »

Ah the joys of psychology.

Right now, upon finding out the person I've been winding up for being a bit stupid for the past few hours actually lives next to me. So close, we're in the same IP pool. This has certain unavoidable connotations.

So either I'm arguing with myself for attention, which isn't the case, or I have had my suspicions concerned about the mental state of people living near me confirmed.

The knee-jerk reaction is to attempt to do anything I can to prove to the onlooker that I am a distinct individual, but ironically that has the side effect of making it look like I'm trying to bolster up the act that some might think I'm perpetuating. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Either way, I'm gonna go grab some smokes and some food. The roads are getting a bit icey so I'll be a while. The upshot is, if I do spin out of control and run over someone, it just might be Eucli.

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39062

Post by Eucliwood »

Plonk wrote:
acathode wrote:It's simply impossible to follow the comments on the video atm, as far as I can tell it hasn't been up for even 2 hours yet afaik, and got 1000+ thumbs up and 500+ comments, and it's probably grow even faster, seeing as TheAmazingAtheist just left a comment, favorited and commented on it, making at least some of his 300.000+ subscribers go check it out as well...
i got a pic of it. it will be hard to keep up with the comments on that video.
http://i.imgur.com/Ijaae.jpg
acathode wrote:Agree with the person who said that FTB probably doesn't like it when TF aims his guns at them, due to his following. I have the feeling that more than one person over at FTB is at this very moment fumingly typing frenetically to get a "counterattack" up ASAP. This will be fun to watch.
:popcorn:
I'm doing some face-palm exercises in preparation. :doh:
HAHAHAHA... I agree with theamazingatheist... I think I'll call myself an atheistatheist now, to separate myself from them. if you want to refer to a group that includes me, you'll have to say atheistatheist, and if you mean to say that atheistatheists are like the religious nuts they protest against, you're telling vicious lies. :arrow:

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39063

Post by Eucliwood »

AchronTimeless wrote:Ah the joys of psychology.

Right now, upon finding out the person I've been winding up for being a bit stupid for the past few hours actually lives next to me. So close, we're in the same IP pool. This has certain unavoidable connotations.

So either I'm arguing with myself for attention, which isn't the case, or I have had my suspicions concerned about the mental state of people living near me confirmed.

The knee-jerk reaction is to attempt to do anything I can to prove to the onlooker that I am a distinct individual, but ironically that has the side effect of making it look like I'm trying to bolster up the act that some might think I'm perpetuating. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Either way, I'm gonna go grab some smokes and some food. The roads are getting a bit icey so I'll be a while. The upshot is, if I do spin out of control and run over someone, it just might be Eucli.
Aw, I expect an apology for what you said in bold. It was truly hurtful. If you don't apologize, I will never forgive you.

With my driving stillinpractice, it's possible I've pissed you off on the road or made you fear for your life. That's good enough for me. I want you, Achron, to keep living on.

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39064

Post by BarnOwl »

mikelf wrote:
Hopefully, you made some Schweddy Balls.

http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/ ... ls/999481/
That's a hilarious parody of NPR hosts. :lol:

Then of course there's Chef's chocolate salty balls ... not just for Crassmas.

[youtube]w24Xd8fVlTU[/youtube]

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39065

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Eucliwood wrote:
Aw, I expect an apology for what you said in bold. It was truly hurtful. If you don't apologize, I will never forgive you.

With my driving stillinpractice, it's possible I've pissed you off on the road or made you fear for your life. That's good enough for me. I want you, Achron, to keep living on.
[youtube]C6ZDsUGiGqM[/youtube]

Rystefn
.
.
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39066

Post by Rystefn »

dinkum wrote:
Rystefn wrote:Wait.. so Atheism isn't a hive-mind? Why the fuck did I sign up, then? No hive-mind, no rape and murder because we're amoral, no culture of sexual harassment and treating women as fuck-toys... I was robbed. I want my money back.
i thought the fuck-toy bit was still being debated...somewhere. Dunno about you, but I was promised cookies and lightsabers. So far, I've had to make my own cookies and it's been sweet fuck all on the lightsaber front. Still beats the scalloped ham and potato casserole shit that the church ladies bring every fucken week.
Fucking debates... I want my fuck-toys.

Also, you've been going to the wrong church. Hit up the Raelians, they're all about luring in new people with hedonistic excesses... at least, they were the last time I interacted with any of them. Hot chicks, good booze, home-made Chex-mix, and the best part is you can string them along for nearly fucking ever if you're good at it, and they'll think they're taking advantage of you.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39067

Post by welch »

Eucliwood wrote:
welch wrote:
Eucliwood wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:BTW, it may just be a coincidence - unfortunate for AchronTimeless if so - but they and Eucliwood are posting from geographically close IPs from the same ISP. Smelling a big juicy one here...
That's so cute. Now "possible sock puppet" warning. How is this not just like the A+ and ASPD forum (yes... this is resembling behavior at an ASPD forum...) bullshit?

Now this is the part where I freak the fuck out in suspicion that I live anywhere near Achron Timeless.

If your name was timex, you couldn't wind yourself up faster. This is awesome.

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

Nice selective bias there. I'm sure you noticed that Achron does not want to live near me either and even demanded my location. But have dreams that you're "winding up" the 'troll" if you want to. If that's what is being attempted here, you're the troll.
Do you ever actually read anything? Because I know you think you know what you think I said, but I think what you think you read isn't really what I said, and I think you're spooling yourself up all on your own now.

It is however, cool as shit to watch.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39068

Post by Steersman »

Gumby wrote:
Git wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Maximus wrote:LOL, I was wondering what the originals/longtimers thought of steersman. He seems..... wordy.
For what it's worth I like the old bugger. Sure, he may argue that water is in fact dry but meh.... Sometimes he actually makes you rethink a position.
I'm the same. Count me in the "we're better off with Steers" faction.
As am I.

I like Steers. It's just that I often skip his posts because, well, I can only handle up to pulsar-density prose. Once it gets into neutron star density territory or greater, my eyes start to cross. :?
:-) That’s some pretty “dense” prose then. But thanks for throwing the nickels; not too many rotten tomatoes along with them. Sorry that much (?) of it is “impenetrable and unnecessarily prolix sludge”, but, as someone said, “if I had more time I would have made a shorter missive” … practice makes perfect and all that …. :-)

mikelf
.
.
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:34 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39069

Post by mikelf »

Eucliwood wrote:I wasn't aware that "Eucliwood" was a username there. They're probably going to get instabanned for being a troll once one of them finds out "Eucliwood" is a name here, since they like to jump the gun. I posted under a medicinal name.
Medicinal? You must be about the only one over there with a name that isn't vaguely Tolkien-ish or new agey.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39070

Post by Scented Nectar »

Lsuoma wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:Hey Guise? Anyone want an...

[...]

...Edit button?
No. Please help keep me honest. :) An edit button would lower the credibility of every post here. No one would know which are originals and which have had things memory holed.
Only kidding. Surely you were around for the great "Edit Button" discussions early on, or did you arrive just after that?
During the week between the last thread at ERV's and me coming over here to the new forum style, the no editing rule was one of the things that made me decide to stick with it. Also, the fact that tone rules never got put in, as well as having a single thread style just like the Pit has always had. Those things convinced me it was all still good, so I came back from my week off. :)

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39071

Post by franc »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
ERV wrote:
rayshul wrote:Well now we bring it up... how come Cap'n Crunch is a man? Is it because women can't be Captains? IS THAT IT, PATRIARCHY!?!?!?!??!
Capn Crunch. Tony the Tiger. Toucan Sam. Trix Rabbit. Lucky the Leprechaun. Sonny the Cocoa Puffs bird. Count Chocula. Frankenberry. Snap, Crackle, and Pop. Dig’Em the Frog. Buzz...

Breakfast cereal is a guy thing!!!
Does this count?

http://wcoa.info/bwb.jpg
Speaking of Barbie, here's a trip down memory lane. And I just noticed what the other doll's name is for the first time -

[youtube]Pybj6QdOLVw[/youtube]

dinkum
.
.
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39072

Post by dinkum »

Rystefn wrote:Fucking debates... I want my fuck-toys.

Also, you've been going to the wrong church. Hit up the Raelians, they're all about luring in new people with hedonistic excesses... at least, they were the last time I interacted with any of them. Hot chicks, good booze, home-made Chex-mix, and the best part is you can string them along for nearly fucking ever if you're good at it, and they'll think they're taking advantage of you.
if only I had stumbled across them in my pre-domesticated days, alas. Moo, and so on.

Gotta ask, though: given the relatable natures of fuck-toys and hedonistic excesses, why did you leave?

AbsurdWalls
.
.
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39073

Post by AbsurdWalls »

Registered so I could ignore Eucliwood.

Rystefn
.
.
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39074

Post by Rystefn »

dinkum wrote:
Rystefn wrote:Fucking debates... I want my fuck-toys.

Also, you've been going to the wrong church. Hit up the Raelians, they're all about luring in new people with hedonistic excesses... at least, they were the last time I interacted with any of them. Hot chicks, good booze, home-made Chex-mix, and the best part is you can string them along for nearly fucking ever if you're good at it, and they'll think they're taking advantage of you.
if only I had stumbled across them in my pre-domesticated days, alas. Moo, and so on.

Gotta ask, though: given the relatable natures of fuck-toys and hedonistic excesses, why did you leave?
Same reason I leave everywhere I've ever left: I got bored and wandered off. More specifically, no matter how pretty they are, there's an upper limit to my tolerance for being surrounded by spectacularly stupid people who think they're incredibly clever. The foundations of the faith are intelligent design creationism, only instead of god, they've got space aliens. I more than half think more than half of them are playing a Pastafarian-esque game of pretending believe in a patently ridiculous set of dogmas for comedy value, but at least a decent-sized chuck of them really truly buy into all of it.

That said: sensual massage makes for some damned-fine foreplay, and those people have made a literal art of it.

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39075

Post by Darren »

AbsurdWalls wrote:Registered so I could ignore Eucliwood.
Lsuoma, I think I just thought up a great recruiting stratergy.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39076

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39077

Post by Gefan »

Anyone else think Thunderfoot just wrapped up Witch of the Year?
I don't gamble any more but if I was making book on this thing I'd say he just dropped to even money.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39078

Post by rayshul »

Hm. After spending a while reading AVFM this morning (spurred on by the commentary earlier in the thread), I'm pretty certain I'm not into the MRA, at least not that manifestation of it. Not my bag. Not to say that some areas aren't interesting - I liked the interview of the chick who'd worked in domestic violence, Erin Pizzey. Like others I'm not seeing a massive difference between feminism and the MRA - both are working in some areas that have absolutely justifiable needs that are specific to specific sexes, and good for them, well done, jolly super, I support those actions/goals. I also support the idea of them fighting the fuck out of each other. But beyond that I genuinely don't give a fuck and I don't have an interest in reading a lot of stuff filled with academic buzzwords.

Fair enough to those who are into that.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39079

Post by Steersman »

Plonk wrote:
acathode wrote:It's simply impossible to follow the comments on the video atm, as far as I can tell it hasn't been up for even 2 hours yet afaik, and got 1000+ thumbs up and 500+ comments, and it's probably grow even faster, seeing as TheAmazingAtheist just left a comment, favorited and commented on it, making at least some of his 300.000+ subscribers go check it out as well...
i got a pic of it. it will be hard to keep up with the comments on that video.
http://i.imgur.com/Ijaae.jpg
...
Haven’t watched TF’s video yet – next on my to-do list – but that comment from The Amazing Atheist is spot on – even if I think he had a bit of a melt-down not too long ago on that issue, seems guilty of the same thing, and even if I think he’s out to lunch on, apparently, blaming just the Newtown shooter: social values and policies have an influence on what we all, or most all of us, do. But the philosopher/biologist Massimo Pigliucci highlighted that problem – and in the context of PZ Myers’ “intemperate hormonal rage” – almost three years ago:
I am often told by my non-activist friends (pretty much all of whom are agnostics or atheists themselves) that the problem with the new atheism is that it looks a lot like the mirror image of the sort of fundamentalist rage that we all so justly abhor. I always shrugged at this accusation as being overblown and missing the point, after all we — unlike them — are on the side of reason and true human compassion. Now I’m not so sure.

RichardReed84
.
.
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:28 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39080

Post by RichardReed84 »

I thought Thunderf00t's latest video was very enlightening. Had no idea P could be so creepy with the sex thing.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39081

Post by Scented Nectar »

Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
Coughlan doesn't even sound like he comprehended the video. He just mumbled out some form of NAFALT simply because of his longstanding feud with TF. Thumbs down.

Y U NO FUNNY ANYMORE Coughlan? :)

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39082

Post by Tony Parsehole »

From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39083

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Scented Nectar wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
Coughlan doesn't even sound like he comprehended the video. He just mumbled out some form of NAFALT simply because of his longstanding feud with TF. Thumbs down.

Y U NO FUNNY ANYMORE Coughlan? :)
You can tell he didn't even watch it. I used to be subscribed to him but when he started begging Tf00t for his sub and then making tantrum videos when he was refused I sacked it. He strikes me as a total nutjob.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39084

Post by cunt »

Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
I don't think he really knows fuck all about this. If he did, he might see that from about 2:56 onwards that he's describing exactly how FTB operates to a tee.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39085

Post by Git »

Tony Parsehole wrote:From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".
Don't worry, I'm sure tomorrow will belong to them.

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39086

Post by Gefan »

Tony Parsehole wrote:From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".
RIP Atheism +
Cause of death: run over by a clown car.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39087

Post by Mykeru »

Reap wrote:
Reap wrote:Here's a podcast for Ed "lying jack-off dickhead hypocrite" Brayton and PZ "lord of inthe darkness" Myers and all the other simpletons who can't see the difference between truth and rhetoric. Click on the graphic Thanks to everyone who was on the call. To quote PZ "We should do this again sometime. Here's my hotel room key"

http://www.reapsowradio.com/wp-content/ ... onhive.gif
Link is fixed ...stupid technology
About time, here's me when I first clicked it:

[youtube]R97TsVDC1BY[/youtube]
Eucliwood wrote:Aw, I expect an apology for what you said in bold. It was truly hurtful. If you don't apologize, I will never forgive you.
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c167/ ... n-stfu.gif

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39088

Post by cunt »

What's everyones problem with this eucliwood guy anyway.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39089

Post by Tony Parsehole »

cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
I don't think he really knows fuck all about this. If he did, he might see that from about 2:56 onwards that he's describing exactly how FTB operates to a tee.
He has no idea what he's talking about. Even Coughlan, a man who breaks his spine bending over backwards to defend muslim's rights to murder people over drawings of Muhammad, would recoil from how FTB operates. He's blinded by his hate and his overpowering inadequacy. I feel sorry for him more than anything.

WoolyBumblebee
.
.
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:14 am
Location: The Twilight Zone of the Twilight Zone.
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39090

Post by WoolyBumblebee »

ReneeHendricks wrote: I'm of the type who feels that words/phrases only have power if you let them. I've been called a "chill girl", a "gender traitor", a bitch, and many others. Water off a duck's back :)
Exactly. Words can only control you if you let them. Case in point, all the A+ whiners. Soon all they'll be able to type in is 'politically correct' 'non-offensive to all fi-fi's' code.

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39091

Post by Darren »

Gefan wrote:Anyone else think Thunderfoot just wrapped up Witch of the Year?
I don't gamble any more but if I was making book on this thing I'd say he just dropped to even money.
Yah... I think this may just nudge out Justin Vacula.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39092

Post by cunt »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
I don't think he really knows fuck all about this. If he did, he might see that from about 2:56 onwards that he's describing exactly how FTB operates to a tee.
He has no idea what he's talking about. Even Coughlan, a man who breaks his spine bending over backwards to defend muslim's rights to murder people over drawings of Muhammad, would recoil from how FTB operates. He's blinded by his hate and his overpowering inadequacy. I feel sorry for him more than anything.
Yeah, it's kind of ironic that he's accusing thunderf00t of just elevating a personal feud to an ideological argument and being small-minded.

Dan
.
.
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:09 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39093

Post by Dan »

Gefan wrote:Anyone else think Thunderfoot just wrapped up Witch of the Year?
I don't gamble any more but if I was making book on this thing I'd say he just dropped to even money.

Yes I think Thunderf00t has it in the bag. So out of the FC5/6 who do you think should take out the Coveted prize of CUNT OF THE YEAR? I myself think Old Prunie should take it for her slander campaigns, comment editing and the death threat flounce etc.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39094

Post by Tony Parsehole »

cunt wrote:What's everyones problem with this eucliwood guy anyway.
Where to begin...
In the 2 days we have enjoyed her company she has been:
Posting random slices of equally random sentences for most of today.
Posting another 2 pages of the same random shite in bolded underline.
Moaning over having no edit button.
Wrote a bolded signature along the lines of "Y U NO DO IRC CHAT INSTEAD OF TALKING ON HERE?" but MUCH wordier.
Got butthurt a lot.
Gradually looked more and more like a troll as the day went by.

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39095

Post by Darren »

Tony Parsehole wrote:From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".
I think that's just the stats for one forum... on the index page I see 34 online.

AbsurdWalls
.
.
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39096

Post by AbsurdWalls »

Tony Parsehole wrote:From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".
No defense of them, but if the forum manages to generate controversy and discussion even with such a small (or mainly inactive/banned*) membership then isn't it probably achieving what it was supposed to? (by which I mean what it was really supposed to) Its profile has grown vastly beyond its membership, I don't think the death knell will be when there are no non-mod members logging in anymore, it will be when people stop talking about it.

My guess is that it will slowly peter out until people are no longer able to find new things there to point and laugh at. It's not likely to blow up in any spectacular way unless that one moderator who is supposedly a sleeper agent breaks cover.

*Are banned members counted in the number of registered users? I wonder what that proportion works out as?

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Hospital

#39097

Post by franc »

Gumby wrote:Blogging at FfTB apparently gives the body miraculous regenerative powers. Between Greta and Ed, I believe something like 17 minutes were actually spent at the hospital.
All this talk of hospitals reminds me of one of my favourite Usenet posts from back when no one knew what the internet was and people still put love into the written word -
From: st.ool@diku.dk
Subject: hospital
Summary: mommy, I've started throwing up the sedatives.
Keywords: long, boring to some
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 91 12:04:01 GMT
Lines: 122

I've always been very fond of hospitals. Not only have I seen most of my family die there in nice, sterile surroundings, deprived of any pride or human similarity they may have had, but the sheer joy of all the sorrow and despair makes my own life a seem little bit lighter. Where other people can do with the odd I'm-a-cripple-but-very-happy-and-believe-in-God stories that mainstream media is cluttered with, I myself find it hard to get that lovely oh-god-thats-horrible-thrill just by reading about it, so once in a while I put the rescue 911 tapes back in the shelf, zip my pants and go for some genuine excitement.

CONTINUED

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39098

Post by Scented Nectar »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
Coughlan doesn't even sound like he comprehended the video. He just mumbled out some form of NAFALT simply because of his longstanding feud with TF. Thumbs down.

Y U NO FUNNY ANYMORE Coughlan? :)
You can tell he didn't even watch it. I used to be subscribed to him but when he started begging Tf00t for his sub and then making tantrum videos when he was refused I sacked it. He strikes me as a total nutjob.
I liked him until a few months ago, when he started saying that Assange should take what's coming to him and that there was no way he'd be in danger if the US had him in custody. I was like whaaaaat? Just like how nicely they've treated Manning and all the gitmo prisoners, I guess, eh? I had to finally acknowledge that even though he used to be funny, he's basically an idiot. He's the flakier side of the left. Also an accommodationalist for pro-sharia islamicism too. Any words against that religion, and he thinks you're a bigot. Other religions are fair game, but oooooo don't offend islam.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39099

Post by Tony Parsehole »

cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
I don't think he really knows fuck all about this. If he did, he might see that from about 2:56 onwards that he's describing exactly how FTB operates to a tee.
He has no idea what he's talking about. Even Coughlan, a man who breaks his spine bending over backwards to defend muslim's rights to murder people over drawings of Muhammad, would recoil from how FTB operates. He's blinded by his hate and his overpowering inadequacy. I feel sorry for him more than anything.
Yeah, it's kind of ironic that he's accusing thunderf00t of just elevating a personal feud to an ideological argument and being small-minded.
When Coughlan finally realises he's not a "Comedian" he should apply for a job at the cinema as a.......PROJECTIONIST!!!!!!!! Wacca, wacca!

somedumbguy
.
.
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39100

Post by somedumbguy »

cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Unable to resist the smell of drama and the chance to moan about Thunderf00t the absurdity that is Richard "The Bellend" Coughlan has made a video response criticising "Why feminism is poisoning Atheism". Not because he believes what he says but because he hates Thundef00t for refusing to subscribe to him. Pointless little cunt that he is.
Not worth embedding:
I don't think he really knows fuck all about this. If he did, he might see that from about 2:56 onwards that he's describing exactly how FTB operates to a tee.
He has no idea what he's talking about. Even Coughlan, a man who breaks his spine bending over backwards to defend muslim's rights to murder people over drawings of Muhammad, would recoil from how FTB operates. He's blinded by his hate and his overpowering inadequacy. I feel sorry for him more than anything.
Yeah, it's kind of ironic that he's accusing thunderf00t of just elevating a personal feud to an ideological argument and being small-minded.
To be honest, I watched that video, saw him smoking wondered about the camera angle, and decided he must be using a bonercam.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39101

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Darren wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:From the A+ Forum right now:

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



BWAAAHAHAAAHAAAAA! I'm so glad that "line in the sand" was drawn. How ashamed I am to be on "the wrong side of history".
I think that's just the stats for one forum... on the index page I see 34 online.

You're right. I am a bellend.

Was good while it lasted though.

Plonk
.
.
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:50 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39102

Post by Plonk »


AbsurdWalls
.
.
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39103

Post by AbsurdWalls »

A+ seems to have evolved into a small discussion circle basically for the mods and for their closest pals where they can play fort. I don't think they would even be much offended by that characterisation. The high-profile initial advocates seemed to spot that pretty quickly, one only wonders what will be the next move. Creating a new label/community is not going to happen again anytime soon if A+ fails.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39104

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Great. Now that comment is top of the page for the next 48 replies.

Can we get an "edit" button installed up in here?

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39105

Post by AndrewV69 »

decius wrote:
JackRayner wrote: I used to ignore this shit, but I can see why Astro, James, and Andrew go off sometimes. This claim is pretty much bullshit.

Feel free to show otherwise.
To show what, that the MRAs' do propaganda, here? And you ask that in a post that mentions ASTRO? ROTFL

Welp, the difference between my propaganda and the baboon propaganda can easily be seen if you compare what the baboons say about this place, the Slymepit and the reality of it.

So if you find yourself with the view that MRA = icky and you can attribute the source to the baboons, then clearly they are better at propaganda than the other side.

Yes?

The issue to my mind is that I do not think I am doing propaganda, but you appear to think that I (and my ilk) are doing so.

So, I do not feel a burning need to come up with a branding and marketing strategy to convince you of anything.

As far as I am concerned it is your issue and only you can resolve it, because it clearly does not matter what facts or evidence that shape my views that I drag before you (like some cat with a tortured and now expired mouse), you are likely to respond :

No! ICKY! Bad Fluffly! Do not want!

AchronTimeless
.
.
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Somewhere out of my mind

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39106

Post by AchronTimeless »

Tony Parsehole wrote: When Coughlan finally realises he's not a "Comedian" he should apply for a job at the cinema as a.......PROJECTIONIST!!!!!!!! Wacca, wacca!
As a former film jockey, I approve of this horrible, horrible pun.

somedumbguy
.
.
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39107

Post by somedumbguy »

Ophelia Benson doesn't understand why Feminism might be blamed for the lack of male teachers in elementary schools.

She says that's not what feminism is all about! But she also says that there is nothing wrong with a staff that is 100% female, it would be the same good as a staff that was 100% black -- no one could have a problem with that!

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... len-redux/
Jesus H Christ almighty – what is she talking about?? Is she claiming that feminism keeps men out of elementary schools? Wtf? Since when does feminism claim that elementary school teachers should all be women? The point of feminism is more that university professors should not all be men. And then, she finds a sea of women’s names depressing. I find that depressing. Same old shit – imagine her saying that if you replaced “the sea of women’s names” with “the sea of black faces.”
Thank you lords of diversity and social justice... Thank you Benson for not understanding that men are put off from teaching in the school system because of the very real threats of false accusations of sexual harassment that feminists insist we ignore and that can cripple a person's life and ruin their careers.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39108

Post by cunt »

Coughlan drama is always good. Like the time he went over the states to fuck his internet girlfriend, who literally asked him to marry her for a british visa. Being a prat, he took that to mean "marry me and we'll be together forever". She changed her mind about moving to the UK and started fucking a bisexual guy with HIV. They broke up. So Coughlan did a shit load of crack and woke up the next day with his legs all fucked up.

Reap
.
.
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Location: Reno Nevada
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39109

Post by Reap »

Mykeru wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Eucliwood,
Perhaps you need to be informed of the reason for the Slymepit before you make incorrect assumptions as to its purpose and style.

The Slymepit is, essentially, the bastard child of PZ Myers and Greg Laden.
These two individuals single arseholedly managed to bring together a disparate band of opponents of demagoguery and sycophancy to create the only force in skepticism with the power to withstand the unholy malevolent shitbaggery that the FTB-Skepchick axis of idiocy has unleashed on the world.
And what is the power we slymepitters possess?
It is the ability to laugh at the pure distilled hypocrisy of our opponents.
It is our collecting examples of Myers telling sexist jokes while lecturing women how to be proper feminists, of wringing his hands at opponents who do not accept the idea of the patriarchy conspiracy and rape culture - all the while having a longstanding policy to threaten uncooperative commenters on his forum with being raped with a dead porcupine.
It is exposing the sham of feminist Stephanie Zvan's defending Greg Laden for calling a female commenter a "bitch" and telling another to "get off the rag and kiss my ass".
It is the exposure of Ophelia Benson lying through her teeth to defend the despicable actions of her friends and condemning others as mysogynists for using the same words her friends do and in the same context.
It is the fact that we are skeptics who allow every viewpoint to be exposed here and for not banning people for simply reading the 'wrong' forum.
But the most important thing to recognize about this forum is that we are not, like PZ Myers and Rebecca Watson, doing this for the money.
We are doing it for the LOLs.
For whatever divergent views we may hold about the disgusting hijacking of US skepticism that Myers and Watson have managed over the past few years, we are united in the opinion that the sheer hypocrisy of their actions compared to their high minded words is, well, fucking funny.
So, join in with us.
We appreciate people bringing some new tantalizing course of Ophelia or Surly Amy freaking out at theirs shadows, all the while figuring out how to win sycophants and influence conference organizers.
Go search Ladens or Svans old posts from the pre-elevatorgate days when they were being targeted by the online feminist hit squad of that time (the brain of which was, believe it or not, fucken Physioproffe!)
Theres lots of juicy morsels awaiting discovery.
Don't come here whining about the forum now.
We are interested in the LOLs.
Bring them and you will be considered one of us.
...my bitches.

That is all.
YOU SAID "bitch" ??!! :o

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39110

Post by Darren »

Tony Parsehole wrote:Great. Now that comment is top of the page for the next 48 replies.

Can we get an "edit" button installed up in here?
I see what you're trying to do there... ;)

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39111

Post by Tony Parsehole »

cunt wrote:Coughlan drama is always good. Like the time he went over the states to fuck his internet girlfriend, who literally asked him to marry her for a british visa. Being a prat, he took that to mean "marry me and we'll be together forever". She changed her mind about moving to the UK and started fucking a bisexual guy with HIV. They broke up. So Coughlan did a shit load of crack and woke up the next day with his legs all fucked up.
Was that "girlfriend" called ThePeachXXX or something?
I never knew any of that back story though. Sounds very Coughlanesque.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39112

Post by franc »

Eucliwood wrote:GUYS. THERE'S LIKE SO MANY POSTS HERE A DAY... ANYONE WANT TO SET UP AN IRC (OR SOME OTHER SORT OF CHAT THING) WE CAN ALSO TALK AT? SO MANY POSTS ARE SKIPPED. AND IRC IS FUN. AND YOU DONT HAVE TO REGISTER THE CHANNEL.
Yes, there are a lot aren't there?
member: Eucliwood posts: 152 joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Over 30 a day. Just from you.

Wouldn't it be nice if people who had nothing to say, simply said nothing, instead of quoting 100 lines of text, images and all, only to add some profundity like "me too!!!"

Yeah, yeah. Grumpy old franc is pushing diarrhoea uphill with a toothpick again, <yawn>.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39113

Post by cunt »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
cunt wrote:Coughlan drama is always good. Like the time he went over the states to fuck his internet girlfriend, who literally asked him to marry her for a british visa. Being a prat, he took that to mean "marry me and we'll be together forever". She changed her mind about moving to the UK and started fucking a bisexual guy with HIV. They broke up. So Coughlan did a shit load of crack and woke up the next day with his legs all fucked up.
Was that "girlfriend" called ThePeachXXX or something?
That's the one. Fit, but just another boring youtube atheist talking head.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39114

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Anyway peeps, bitches and ho's, it's time for bed. Night all.
[youtube]kZTBDnj0Cgc[/youtube]

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39115

Post by Tigzy »

cunt wrote:Coughlan drama is always good. Like the time he went over the states to fuck his internet girlfriend, who literally asked him to marry her for a british visa. Being a prat, he took that to mean "marry me and we'll be together forever". She changed her mind about moving to the UK and started fucking a bisexual guy with HIV. They broke up. So Coughlan did a shit load of crack and woke up the next day with his legs all fucked up.
In his defence, he clearly has a talent for making you feel better about your own life. That's just fuckin hilarious.

Is this Coughlan dude the guy who's unemployed, but goes on about being a stand-up comic, or something?

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39116

Post by franc »

Tkmlac wrote:
Gumby wrote:Damn, I love the "ignore poster" feature. I rarely use it, but occasionally it's invaluable to cut down on obnoxious babblers.

:whistle:
That's a thing? I didn't know.
See this -

http://i.imgur.com/lQIZy.png

Yes, some people reach a point where the probability of value added contributions from them approaches zero. This doesn't obliterate them from view, just collapses their comments and you can still expand and view if you wish.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39117

Post by Scented Nectar »

Tony Parsehole wrote:When Coughlan finally realises he's not a "Comedian" he should apply for a job at the cinema as a.......PROJECTIONIST!!!!!!!! Wacca, wacca!
Now THAT'S funny! :lol:

Jan Steen
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 3:18 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39118

Post by Jan Steen »

Steersman wrote:
Plonk wrote:
acathode wrote:It's simply impossible to follow the comments on the video atm, as far as I can tell it hasn't been up for even 2 hours yet afaik, and got 1000+ thumbs up and 500+ comments, and it's probably grow even faster, seeing as TheAmazingAtheist just left a comment, favorited and commented on it, making at least some of his 300.000+ subscribers go check it out as well...
i got a pic of it. it will be hard to keep up with the comments on that video.
http://i.imgur.com/Ijaae.jpg
...
Haven’t watched TF’s video yet – next on my to-do list – but that comment from The Amazing Atheist is spot on – even if I think he had a bit of a melt-down not too long ago on that issue, seems guilty of the same thing, and even if I think he’s out to lunch on, apparently, blaming just the Newtown shooter: social values and policies have an influence on what we all, or most all of us, do. But the philosopher/biologist Massimo Pigliucci highlighted that problem – and in the context of PZ Myers’ “intemperate hormonal rage” – almost three years ago:
I am often told by my non-activist friends (pretty much all of whom are agnostics or atheists themselves) that the problem with the new atheism is that it looks a lot like the mirror image of the sort of fundamentalist rage that we all so justly abhor. I always shrugged at this accusation as being overblown and missing the point, after all we — unlike them — are on the side of reason and true human compassion. Now I’m not so sure.
You're not seriously conflating the New Atheists (Dawkins, Dennet, Hitchens et al.) with the Atheism Plus/Skepchick loons (PZ, Rebecca Watson et al.)? Come on, that's trolling pure and simple.

WoolyBumblebee
.
.
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:14 am
Location: The Twilight Zone of the Twilight Zone.
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39119

Post by WoolyBumblebee »

Eucliwood wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote:FTR, I'm someone who identifies as an MRA and an egalitarian. However, I refuse to align myself with feminism simply because of what they stand for these days. To be perfectly honest, the whole label thing seems silly to me (I tried to list out all the labels that would apply to me but I ran out of room on my Twitter bio). But it seems it's easier for people to understand if you give them some labels to research.
Yeah, I'm more hesitant to call myself a feminist with the recent wave... I didn't know there was a label for MRAs til recently, so before I just said I was for men's rights.
Count me the same as Renee. I hold many 'labels' in life.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#39120

Post by AndrewV69 »

Maximus wrote:LOL, I was wondering what the originals/longtimers thought of steersman. He seems..... wordy.
I like Steersman myself (although I doubt I have convinced him about anything) inspite/despite/because of his views.

YMMV

Locked