Bleeding from the Bunghole

Old subthreads
Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21001

Post by Ape+lust »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Oh my god.
I just came.
Maybe now she'll notice. I didn't make her list. More importantly, GEFAN didn't make her list. This lazy_savant weirdo makes one wisecrack and she goes batshit and rounds up everybody... but no Gefan.

He makes them look so stupid I feel sorry for Nazis. It's Gefan, Stephanie, G-E-F-A-N.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21002

Post by Gumby »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21003

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Thanks for the heads up on how to find her response, it took a lot of slogging through some pretty tepid, although extensive alleged evidence to get to her even more tepid answer.


I am very sorry for your trauma, whatever your name is. I hope that PZ took immediate steps when you brought this to his attention to make sure no broken bottles would actually be allowed in the Thunderdome, his open comment thread.

And that’s where things stand at the moment. So, that should answer that question.
Actually, the SJW that threatened me lives in Canada, possibly beyond PZ's jurisdiction, so I considered reporting to actual authorities as anyone that really took it seriously would. But then I remembered that feminist scholars have asserted that reporting crimes to the police is the wrong thing to do.
Another incident that discouraged me from reporting to the patriarchy was a certain alleged "principled" person called Chris Clarke that told me to suck it up that that hellion wouldn't come through the computer screen and cut me, then proceeded to ban ME, instead of the person using the nym "Tethys" that made a felony terrorist threat against me.
That question really hasn't been answered.
When you say that is where things stand at the moment, do you mean we are now considering the threats made against you as legitimate but I should ignore the ones against me because I haven't notified PZ?
I look forward to you clearing this matter up Steph!

Suet Cardigan
.
.
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21004

Post by Suet Cardigan »

Really? wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:The real problem with that Dragoncon event is that we didn't have someone like Rebecca Watson there, providing the kind of high minded and classy example for which she is deservedly famous.

[youtube]3GZNGLwYVcY[/youtube]
Is that really RW? The glasses look like hers. You have GOT to be shitting me. The woman literally brands another man's skin (yes, with marker that will wash off eventually), but has made tens of thousands of dollars off of being propositioned on an elevator.

Do I have this straight? Scribbling on a man's ass = okay.
Including someone in an @ tweet = harassment that causes PTSD.

Amazing.
It's definitely Watson. She autographs asses too.
3728649512_001df3df0f_z.jpg
(111.66 KiB) Downloaded 311 times
3228610662_16fb81f086.jpg
(119.63 KiB) Downloaded 321 times
3228611164_9d75e7d6f9.jpg
(117.38 KiB) Downloaded 289 times

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21005

Post by Lsuoma »

Who's the bloke?

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21006

Post by Really? »

Suet Cardigan wrote:
Really? wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:The real problem with that Dragoncon event is that we didn't have someone like Rebecca Watson there, providing the kind of high minded and classy example for which she is deservedly famous.

[youtube]3GZNGLwYVcY[/youtube]
Is that really RW? The glasses look like hers. You have GOT to be shitting me. The woman literally brands another man's skin (yes, with marker that will wash off eventually), but has made tens of thousands of dollars off of being propositioned on an elevator.

Do I have this straight? Scribbling on a man's ass = okay.
Including someone in an @ tweet = harassment that causes PTSD.

Amazing.
It's definitely Watson. She autographs asses too.
3728649512_001df3df0f_z.jpg
3228610662_16fb81f086.jpg
3228611164_9d75e7d6f9.jpg
Freaking amazing. Maybe we should all have a day where we change our Twitter icons/Facebook images, etc. to the image of Beckybooze. You know, like they do for marriage equality or breast cancer. (But not for prostate cancer for some reason.)

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21007

Post by Ape+lust »

Lsuoma wrote:
Who's the bloke?
That's Lazy_Savant, the twitter-er who said he wants to wear Stephanie's skin.

http://i.imgur.com/s4YTrCi.jpg
BarnOwl wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Somehow reminds me of the old-fashioned clothes wringer my grandma had.
Gumby wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Thanks guys! :D :D :D :dance:

feralandproud
.
.
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:49 pm
Location: sunny motherfuckin' florida

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21008

Post by feralandproud »

Seems as though someones feathers got a little ruffled. Guess I've gotta eat my hat now. I'll get on that twitter thing tomorrow if it's still going on.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21009

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Gefan: I love your videos. You have incredible talent, but you never get recognition.
You need an agent. Her is the sort of rave review you need to achieve success.
PZ Myers

November 8, 2013 at 8:05 pm (UTC -6)

Oh, deary me. I was so concerned that I quickly opened up my site control panel and made absolutely sure that abear was solidly banned. Don’t worry about him, he’s safe now.
Great art is more than making beautiful things, you need to get your hands dirty and promote your work! :clap:

justinvacula
.
.
Posts: 1832
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21010

Post by justinvacula »


AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21011

Post by AndrewV69 »

Ape+lust wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Oh my god.
I just came.
Maybe now she'll notice. I didn't make her list. More importantly, GEFAN didn't make her list. This lazy_savant weirdo makes one wisecrack and she goes batshit and rounds up everybody... but no Gefan.

He makes them look so stupid I feel sorry for Nazis. It's Gefan, Stephanie, G-E-F-A-N.
As I recall Hitler touched upon something of the sort when he was interviewed about his casting in the role of Myers.

You could see it in his face (actually his whole demeanour betrayed the fact that he was still emotionally exhausted and spent), his weary, fatalistic acceptance that Hollywood was going to shy away from performance because he had succeeded beyond his expectations in portraying the PeeZuss experience.

The awful reality, the chilling realization, that anyone, anyone who came close enough would cross the event horizon, the point of no return where escape is quite simply impossible and one is simply sucked into the black hole to be one within the singularity.

This is an uncomfortable truth for anyone to possess so we must not condemn them too harshly. It is one thing to be unable to escape. It is quite another to understand this. No, no I say, it is far better to believe that you stay there of your own choice rather than acknowledge that your own stupidity led you into the morass in the first place, and from which you can never return, as much as you would like to.

Sarlug

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21012

Post by Sarlug »

Haha, I just saw a bunch of SJWs throwing shitfits on Twitter because Conan O'Brian made a crack about the new Muslim superheroine having more powers than her husband's other wives. How do people this hypersensitive manage to get through the day without hanging themselves?

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21013

Post by Lsuoma »

Ape+lust wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:
Who's the bloke?
That's Lazy_Savant, the twitter-er who said he wants to wear Stephanie's skin.

http://i.imgur.com/s4YTrCi.jpg
BarnOwl wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Somehow reminds me of the old-fashioned clothes wringer my grandma had.
Gumby wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Thanks guys! :D :D :D :dance:
Thanks. This is a Saturday Night Winner.

Plonk
.
.
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21014

Post by Plonk »

I'm going to have to side with Svan on this latest craziness. LazySavant's "woman suit" tweet was way out of line, and his videos of knife sharpening are probably nightmare material for Stephanie. I wouldn't blame her at all for contacting the police.

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21015

Post by John D »

Ok. So this is a really odd and lame video... but it cracks me up... so... here you go... Dog Police!
[youtube]0359hSerDeE[/youtube]

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21016

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Plonk wrote:I'm going to have to side with Svan on this latest craziness. LazySavant's "woman suit" tweet was way out of line, and his videos of knife sharpening are probably nightmare material for Stephanie. I wouldn't blame her at all for contacting the police.
The thing is, I agree as well. What I'm left wondering, however, is why she's actively digging for more of the same? You see the shit, you block the shit, and you move the fuck on. LS is fucking creepy and an ass. He's *loving* the attention and that's it. You'd think Szvanity would figure that out.

Guest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21017

Post by Guest »


John Greg
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 2669
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: New Westminster, BC, Canada

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21018

Post by John Greg »

Andrew said (http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 56#p141156):
The awful reality, the chilling realization, that anyone, anyone who came close enough would cross the event horizon, the point of no return where escape is quite simply impossible and one is simply sucked into the black hole to be one within the singularity Pharyngularity.
FTFY.

:)

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21019

Post by James Caruthers »

Really? wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:The real problem with that Dragoncon event is that we didn't have someone like Rebecca Watson there, providing the kind of high minded and classy example for which she is deservedly famous.

[youtube]3GZNGLwYVcY[/youtube]
Is that really RW? The glasses look like hers. You have GOT to be shitting me. The woman literally brands another man's skin (yes, with marker that will wash off eventually), but has made tens of thousands of dollars off of being propositioned on an elevator.

Do I have this straight? Scribbling on a man's ass = okay.
Including someone in an @ tweet = harassment that causes PTSD.

Amazing.
To be fair, the dumbass simp in the video probably volunteered. "Please, my red-haired goddess! Please write on my ass!" I'd say it was PZ, but the arse isn't nearly hairy enough. Also, that ass should be against youtube's anti-porn rules. :lol:

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21020

Post by Aneris »

ReneeHendricks wrote:
Plonk wrote:I'm going to have to side with Svan on this latest craziness. LazySavant's "woman suit" tweet was way out of line, and his videos of knife sharpening are probably nightmare material for Stephanie. I wouldn't blame her at all for contacting the police.
The thing is, I agree as well. What I'm left wondering, however, is why she's actively digging for more of the same? You see the shit, you block the shit, and you move the fuck on. LS is fucking creepy and an ass. He's *loving* the attention and that's it. You'd think Szvanity would figure that out.
I found it creepy, too. Yet, when I see it is immediately made into a Slymepit thing, my reaction isn't caving in and somehow accept her interpretation. Especially since their side has choked communication alltogether, I have no desire lending the few sentences that get through to demagogues and manipulators.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21021

Post by Ape+lust »

Guest wrote:Being A Feminist Is A Privilege
http://thoughtcatalog.com/chelsea-fagan ... privilege/
Good heavens. That non-academic minimum wage slave writes better than Marcotte, 99% of FtB, and all of Skepchick/Shakesville. I hope she's got the energy to deal with the shitheads when they dogpile her. Hats off to a truly independent feminist.

clownshoe
.
.
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:57 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21022

Post by clownshoe »

Aneris wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote:
Plonk wrote:I'm going to have to side with Svan on this latest craziness. LazySavant's "woman suit" tweet was way out of line, and his videos of knife sharpening are probably nightmare material for Stephanie. I wouldn't blame her at all for contacting the police.
The thing is, I agree as well. What I'm left wondering, however, is why she's actively digging for more of the same? You see the shit, you block the shit, and you move the fuck on. LS is fucking creepy and an ass. He's *loving* the attention and that's it. You'd think Szvanity would figure that out.
I found it creepy, too. Yet, when I see it is immediately made into a Slymepit thing, my reaction isn't caving in and somehow accept her interpretation. Especially since their side has choked communication alltogether, I have no desire lending the few sentences that get through to demagogues and manipulators.
I want to know why my tweet is included on her page?
My tweet was calling bullshit on LazySavant's claims that because he never @'d her, she shouldn't call him a harasser. Since she didn't include the LazySavant tweet I responded to, my tweet is out of context but hopefully clearly isn't an example of harassment.

LazySavant's tweet is a Jerry Coyne level of utter stupid.

clownshoe
.
.
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:57 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21023

Post by clownshoe »

LOL sorry Professor Coyne, I meant Jerry Conlon.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21024

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:I'm trying to get as many Twitter people involved in Svan's new post to change their Twitter names to "Svan Has A Sad" and their avatars to Myra Hindley.
Not for any particular reason. I just think it's funny that if you change something on Twitter it alters Zvan's blogpost too.
May this come to pass.
Have a look at the post now.
Lovely!

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21025

Post by Aneris »

clownshoe wrote:
Aneris wrote: <inner quotes removed>
I found it creepy, too. Yet, when I see it is immediately made into a Slymepit thing, my reaction isn't caving in and somehow accept her interpretation. Especially since their side has choked communication alltogether, I have no desire lending the few sentences that get through to demagogues and manipulators.
I want to know why my tweet is included on her page?
My tweet was calling bullshit on LazySavant's claims that because he never @'d her, she shouldn't call him a harasser. Since she didn't include the LazySavant tweet I responded to, my tweet is out of context but hopefully clearly isn't an example of harassment.

LazySavant's tweet is a Jerry Coyne Conlon level of utter stupid.
Indeed, why us anyone on her page?

1) some dude makes a tasteless tweet
2) Zvan blames the slymepit
3) Slymepit is pissed off, some back and forth
4) Zvan takes samples from Slymepit to justify her means.
5) Commentariat doesn't notice anything, no critical though whatsoever.
Authoritarians Summary wrote:describes the lack of logic in their thinking; when they like the conclusion, how that conclusion was arrived at is irrelevant. When they like the behaver, the behavior is acceptable; when they dislike the behaver, the behavior is not. [...] He then goes on to describe high Social Dominators. These people want power, and they don’t much care how they get it. “The end justifies the means” is their guiding principle.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21026

Post by Steersman »

Aneris wrote:
clownshoe wrote:
Aneris wrote: <inner quotes removed>
I found it creepy, too. Yet, when I see it is immediately made into a Slymepit thing, my reaction isn't caving in and somehow accept her interpretation. Especially since their side has choked communication alltogether, I have no desire lending the few sentences that get through to demagogues and manipulators.
I want to know why my tweet is included on her page?
My tweet was calling bullshit on LazySavant's claims that because he never @'d her, she shouldn't call him a harasser. Since she didn't include the LazySavant tweet I responded to, my tweet is out of context but hopefully clearly isn't an example of harassment.

LazySavant's tweet is a Jerry Coyne Conlon level of utter stupid.
Indeed, why [is] anyone [of us?] on her page?
1) some dude makes a tasteless tweet
2) Zvan blames the slymepit
3) Slymepit is pissed off, some back and forth
4) Zvan takes samples from Slymepit to justify her means.
5) Commentariat doesn't notice anything, no critical though whatsoever.
Authoritarians Summary wrote:describes the lack of logic in their thinking; when they like the conclusion, how that conclusion was arrived at is irrelevant. When they like the behaver, the behavior is acceptable; when they dislike the behaver, the behavior is not. [...] He then goes on to describe high Social Dominators. These people want power, and they don’t much care how they get it. “The end justifies the means” is their guiding principle.
Good question.

But maybe somewhat apropos, I’ve probably quoted this a couple of times here, but I think it bears repeating; it’s something from Shermer’s The Believing Brain:
Shermer wrote:As we saw in the previous chapter, politics is filled with self-justifying rationalizations. Democrats see the world through liberal-tinted glasses, while Republicans filter it through conservative shaded glasses. When you listen to both “conservative talk radio” and “progressive talk radio” you will hear current events interpreted in ways that are 180 degrees out of phase. So incongruent are the interpretations of even the simplest goings-on in the daily news that you wonder if they can possibly be talking about the same event. [pg 263] [my emphasis]
I certainly think “our” side has the high ground, largely as a result of a forthright and commendable commitment to “free speech” and open discussion boards. But one can’t help but get the impression that, at times, at least some of “our” positions have an element of that “the end justifies the means”, of a similar “lack of logic”. You may wish to review Lewis Carroll’s story “What the Tortise Said to Achilles”, but the point seems to be that very different assumptions – kind of the nature of the beast – tend to lead to very different conclusions and to be rather problematic at best. Not sure how “we” can get over that hurdle. Although I'll certainly argue that free speech is a necessary precursor.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21027

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Aneris wrote:
clownshoe wrote:
Aneris wrote: <inner quotes removed>
I found it creepy, too. Yet, when I see it is immediately made into a Slymepit thing, my reaction isn't caving in and somehow accept her interpretation. Especially since their side has choked communication alltogether, I have no desire lending the few sentences that get through to demagogues and manipulators.
I want to know why my tweet is included on her page?
My tweet was calling bullshit on LazySavant's claims that because he never @'d her, she shouldn't call him a harasser. Since she didn't include the LazySavant tweet I responded to, my tweet is out of context but hopefully clearly isn't an example of harassment.

LazySavant's tweet is a Jerry Coyne Conlon level of utter stupid.
Indeed, why us anyone on her page?

1) some dude makes a tasteless tweet
2) Zvan blames the slymepit
3) Slymepit is pissed off, some back and forth
4) Zvan takes samples from Slymepit to justify her means.
5) Commentariat doesn't notice anything, no critical though whatsoever.
Authoritarians Summary wrote:describes the lack of logic in their thinking; when they like the conclusion, how that conclusion was arrived at is irrelevant. When they like the behaver, the behavior is acceptable; when they dislike the behaver, the behavior is not. [...] He then goes on to describe high Social Dominators. These people want power, and they don’t much care how they get it. “The end justifies the means” is their guiding principle.
The thing I noticed right at the outset of the schism was the fact that they really do see the whole thing as a battle of good and evil. Any insult made against someone on their team is unjustified (since they are good) and all insults against them are grouped together, hence a peurile act of calling one of them fat, ugly or stupid, is conflated with the worst a troll can fling - death wishes, threats etc.
And any insults made against any of their ideological opponents is really an opposition to evil and so totally justified.
In this way you can have Steph Svan and Ophelia Benson, two D-list bloggers with A-list self images, spending their days flinging insults far and wide (calling people shits, liars, rape supporters, stupid etc) and yet any splashback from people they have childishly insulted is instantly considered blasphemy against their holy name.
I try to avoid making jokes or insults based purely on appearances but I hope that any reasonable person can see a difference between those kind of jokes and genuine death threats and therefore realise the danger in pretending they are in some way equal ("I seriously think we should phone the FBI".) To equate them is to show a disgusting level of disregard for genuine cases of harassment that involve threats of violence.
29
Great American Satan

November 8, 2013 at 11:14 pm (UTC -6)

“Just a fat joke” is a pretty loathsome defense, especially since the substance of the joke is about total dehumanization unto death. Hm, random google result about the relationship between being fat and thinking about death: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/121972.php … Yes, “just a fat joke,” totally harmless… *hurk*

These asshats push every button in a guy with their utter disregard for human lives, and when someone like Tethys finally blows up a little and gives a fraction of the evil back that these guys put out, they crow about it like, “oh, see, they’re so wicked and evil. Two sides!” I, like Tethys, find it extremely difficult to refrain from using the language of violence with these creeps. And so I will stop talking now.
They come across as mentally unhinged.
I don't think Svan does, though.
She is an evil manipulator who enjoys twisting those idiots around her fingers.
But Svan, as I know you are reading this, I think you should be aware, you might fool some of the FTB sycophants all of the time, but anyone with any sense has seen though your crass machiavellian schemes long ago. The atheist/skeptical community has a lot of people with sense; all you've done is purged them from your side.

You think we should care more about childish jokes made about you by random people we don't know, rather than threats of violence and comparisons of ourselves to terrorist bombers made by your own supporters (and hosted by you on your blog)?
Really?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21028

Post by James Caruthers »

From Zvanatee's latest manufactured controversy (comments section) we have this:
maudell: What’s with the Myra Hindley profile pictures? Did they change it along with the ‘Stephanie haz a sad’ name to add to the threat? I guess real life serial killer/rapist impersonations (with real life victims still alive) are all the rage among sociopaths.
I LOL'D

So someone makes a joke-> HARASSMENT AND EVIL THREATS
Someone edits their twitter to make it even more obvious it's a joke-> INCREASING THE EVIL THREATS
Someone goes looking on twatter for random people who bitch about her, then lies and says they're pitters-> A POOR VICTIM

I look forward to doing this all again next week when Ophie decided to go ego-fishing again.

Guest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21029

Post by Guest »

Southern wrote:
Guest wrote:
mikelf wrote:
If you don't mind me JAQing off for a moment, I want to push back on this for a second. My question is simple: Ellen Beth Wachs went from persona non grata around here to being (mostly) accepted after she crossed that gaggle of social retarded toddlers that PZ considers his Horde. If EBW can be redeemed of her past SJW, why not Ophelia? Has Ophelia done anything that EBW wasn't previously guilty of?

Several folks here have spoken positively of her early collaborative work at B&W and Kamarkin said earlier today that "I don't believe that the SJW mindset is "natural" for her. I think she's been strongly pushed into it. I still think it's only a matter of time before she says/does the wrong thing and gets drummed out for it." Must she leave the SJW nest in a blaze of glory (like EBW) before people here will consider giving her a chance? Or is there room for rapprochement in the absence of that?
never say never

but ophelia has too much time and ego invested while ebw took a first objective look outside and reconsidered

even though aplus may have written ophelia off theyre of no concern to her. just her ego, which has had many MANY opportunities to adjust stance and stop being a creationist (of her own harassment)

never say never, but looooooooooooong odds
Could I still make Card Against Humanity references with her?

Black card:
"What helps Obama Ophelia to relax?"

White card:
"Pixelated bukkake."

Black card:
"What do old people Ophelia Benson smells like?"

White card:
"Poopy diapers."

Black card:
"What is Batman's Ophelia's guilty pleasure?"

White card:
"Surprise sex!"

Black card:
"During sex, I Ophelia likes to think about __________"

White card:
"Penis envy."

The SJW crowd is right, this game is very funny. Specially when you pu their names on the cards! I'm sure they would love this variant.
of course, its just good natured fun

being horrible is what cards against humanity is all about

Pogsurf

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21030

Post by Pogsurf »

mikelf wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
jet_lagg wrote:So, I've been in semi-regular communication with Ophelia Benson since I arrived here. What's the general sentiment about her? Does anyone think it would be possible to come to terms? Are we too far gone for that?
[snip]
In short, Benson neither shares any common ground with us, nor, if she did, would her sad personal & professional traits offer any value-add to our endeavors. But that's moot, as Benson herself refuses to engage us in debate or compromise on her radical demands. As I noted earlier, (viewtopic.php?f=28&t=373), her pattern of behavior mirrors that of a cult leader.
If you don't mind me JAQing off for a moment, I want to push back on this for a second. My question is simple: Ellen Beth Wachs went from persona non grata around here to being (mostly) accepted after she crossed that gaggle of social retarded toddlers that PZ considers his Horde. If EBW can be redeemed of her past SJW, why not Ophelia? Has Ophelia done anything that EBW wasn't previously guilty of?

Several folks here have spoken positively of her early collaborative work at B&W and Kamarkin said earlier today that "I don't believe that the SJW mindset is "natural" for her. I think she's been strongly pushed into it. I still think it's only a matter of time before she says/does the wrong thing and gets drummed out for it." Must she leave the SJW nest in a blaze of glory (like EBW) before people here will consider giving her a chance? Or is there room for rapprochement in the absence of that?
Here's the number Benson tried to pull on me:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... -the-mail/

I revived some of Myers' best anal rape jokes and she labelled it a "sick little thing". She tried to claim I was stalking her at first, which even she realised was daft when she discovered I'd sent exactly the same material to a whole host of people. Myers turns up in the comments without acknowledging the material is his. He twice suggests that other people should ring me up and harass me. He's willing to supply my number. Presumably he is too frit to do it himself because like all bullies he's a coward at heart. Commentators suggest I should be reported to Hertfordshire Police and that I should be dobbed in to the Green Party. I just re-read the comments and it is a true joy to behold.

If something I write gets labelled "sick" I want it to at least be my own work, not Myers' old stuff rehashed. For the record I think Benson is a bigoted old witch.

rpguest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21031

Post by rpguest »

Tony Parsehole wrote: Zvan's response?:
I am very sorry for your trauma, whatever your name is. I hope that PZ took immediate steps when you brought this to his attention to make sure no broken bottles would actually be allowed in the Thunderdome, his open comment thread.
twitter's response to zvan:
we are very sorry, whatever your name is. (wait seriously, that's your real name, not a handle?) we will make sure if we ever roll out a skin flaying API it will be purely opt in

rpguest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21032

Post by rpguest »

Steersman wrote:
Aneris wrote: Indeed, why [is] anyone [of us?] on her page?
1) some dude makes a tasteless tweet
2) Zvan blames the slymepit
3) Slymepit is pissed off, some back and forth
4) Zvan takes samples from Slymepit to justify her means.
5) Commentariat doesn't notice anything, no critical though whatsoever.
Authoritarians Summary wrote:describes the lack of logic in their thinking; when they like the conclusion, how that conclusion was arrived at is irrelevant. When they like the behaver, the behavior is acceptable; when they dislike the behaver, the behavior is not. [...] He then goes on to describe high Social Dominators. These people want power, and they don’t much care how they get it. “The end justifies the means” is their guiding principle.
Good question.

But maybe somewhat apropos, I’ve probably quoted this a couple of times here, but I think it bears repeating; it’s something from Shermer’s The Believing Brain:
Shermer wrote:As we saw in the previous chapter, politics is filled with self-justifying rationalizations. Democrats see the world through liberal-tinted glasses, while Republicans filter it through conservative shaded glasses. When you listen to both “conservative talk radio” and “progressive talk radio” you will hear current events interpreted in ways that are 180 degrees out of phase. So incongruent are the interpretations of even the simplest goings-on in the daily news that you wonder if they can possibly be talking about the same event. [pg 263] [my emphasis]
I certainly think “our” side has the high ground, largely as a result of a forthright and commendable commitment to “free speech” and open discussion boards. But one can’t help but get the impression that, at times, at least some of “our” positions have an element of that “the end justifies the means”, of a similar “lack of logic”. You may wish to review Lewis Carroll’s story “What the Tortise Said to Achilles”, but the point seems to be that very different assumptions – kind of the nature of the beast – tend to lead to very different conclusions and to be rather problematic at best. Not sure how “we” can get over that hurdle. Although I'll certainly argue that free speech is a necessary precursor.
quoting shermer now?

obviously proof positive of what misogynistic scum you are

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21033

Post by Dick Strawkins »

rpguest wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote: Zvan's response?:
I am very sorry for your trauma, whatever your name is. I hope that PZ took immediate steps when you brought this to his attention to make sure no broken bottles would actually be allowed in the Thunderdome, his open comment thread.
twitter's response to zvan:
we are very sorry, whatever your name is. (wait seriously, that's your real name, not a handle?) we will make sure if we ever roll out a skin flaying API it will be purely opt in
Svan acknowledges (as Chris Clarke did before) that threats of violence on the internet don't equate to real-life threats, which is why she essentially dismisses it as irrelevant.

Which is why this whole act of poor harassed steffie is really a sham.
As always, their ideology boils down to six little words.

"It's OK when WE do it"

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21034

Post by Ape+lust »

Oolon has family in the House of Lords?

http://i.imgur.com/GNhESUP.png

I wonder if he's related to peerage. Might explain how he can fuck off on the internet all day and collect a paycheck.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21035

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Ape+lust wrote:Oolon has family in the House of Lords?

http://i.imgur.com/GNhESUP.png

I wonder if he's related to peerage. Might explain how he can fuck off on the internet all day and collect a paycheck.
There is a "Baroness Billingham", appointed as a life peer by Labour in 2000 - it must be her.

She was involved in a scandal a few years ago according to wikipedia:
Subsistence Allowances are designed to help peers who live in the country to attend late-night votes and debates in Parliament, Billingham, who has a flat in Hampstead and a country house in Suffolk claimed £26,983 in 2006-07 in overnight allowances, prompting calls for an inquiry.[6]
These types of expenses scandals were pretty common in the UK at that time. If it happened now she would have no problem since the Baroness, as family of a prominent FTB cog, could invoke the one rule that binds all others:

"It's OK when we do it"

Pogsurf

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21036

Post by Pogsurf »

Ape+lust wrote:Oolon has family in the House of Lords?

http://i.imgur.com/GNhESUP.png

I wonder if he's related to peerage. Might explain how he can fuck off on the internet all day and collect a paycheck.
Anyone involved with local politics will know how laughable Oolon's threat to me was. If anything the rule is the more outrage you can generate in your political opponents the better you will spread your message.

Pogsurf

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21037

Post by Pogsurf »

Hi Justin. I've just started reading de Botton's Religion for Atheists, which I am enjoying a lot. Why did you want to highlight DJ's tweet?


Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21039

Post by Dick Strawkins »


James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21040

Post by James Caruthers »

http://jezebel.com/watch-joss-whedon-ma ... 1460080685
Here's the relevant dick sucking-I mean, article, from Jezebel. I just have to laugh at feminists being angry over the term feminist. I'm sorry feminists, but it is modern feminists who have created the negative buzz around the word. You are going to have to lie in the beds you made. And saying "there is no middle ground" isn't likely to help the old image problems.

I doubt Whedon has to beg women for sex, but maybe he sees his support of feminism as a necessary counterbalance to the sexualization of female characters in his own films and tv shows.

And of course, not everyone in the comments are happy about this. Even though he is essentially lapping at the feminist clit, they feel it necessary to point and him and shout WHITE MALE TALKING ABOUT FEMINISM. Honestly, modern feminists are some of the most fucking sexist people I have ever seen. It does not matter what any man says about feminism, the fact he is talking about feminism is enough to complain at him. Then feminists turn around and say that feminism just means equal rights. I mean, seriously, what the fuck? Either let feminism mean equal rights, in which case men and women all have an equal say on equal rights, or make feminism a girl's club and let the men form their own movements for their own needs. I honestly don't care which, either would be better than what they are doing now.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21041

Post by James Caruthers »

The most popular Men's Rights Activist is a woman. Would SJW feminists stand for it if the most popular modern feminist was a man? Would they applaud him?

While I do not agree with everything MRAs say, at least they can walk the walk on gender equality.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21042

Post by James Caruthers »

fortheloveofbeetsLHB
2

Yeah, that is super frustrating. It's a nice gesture, I guess, but it encourages the idea that all that's required of anyone to do their part in ending sexism is just to agree with the notion that women and men are equals. In reality, that doesn't get us anywhere much, and there's so much more to understand and such difficult work to do in dismantling sexist systems. Thursday 1:01pm
Silly Joss, we educated feminists know that REAL feminism doesn't only mean treating men and women equally! :lol:

It also means the stuff from my Gender Theory 101 course in college and stuff.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21043

Post by Badger3k »

BarnOwl wrote:
Aneris wrote:
<snip>

PZ takes a brief break: “sick, exasperated, tired, overloaded” (not much text else, comments are just “get well”) and thinks about what to do with this mess. I sympathize. The thing with cognitive dissonace is that it sweeps convictions away, or bolsters them. They were hardened a few times, like when he was proud of his horde. But there comes a point where you can't possibly keep it up. And that seems to come through now. PZ is also a very judgemental person. It would be very unusual when he genuinely coulnd't see the various flaws he doesn't like with other people in his horde.
PZ's disingenuous and judgmental posts and comments about people who disagree with him reduce my sympathy significantly. Most human beings get sick, or feel tired and frustrated and overloaded from time to time, and most of us just have to suck it up. Many of the FtB woes and ills seem to be self-inflicted, in any case, or dubious at best. Can't work because you have ADD and you don't like to work and instead prefer to dose yourself with beer, pizza, and Ritalin that wasn't prescribed to you? Really? Seems pretty fucking stupid and immature to me. I don't wish illness and accidents and misfortune on them, but at the same time, I'm not particularly sympathetic to the relatively minor complaints and hardships that they blow out of proportion.
WTF? I assume this refers to Clarke - I hadn't bothered to read his piece, but he's a junkie taking illegal meds? And this is the eco-warrior that PZ respects? WTF again - between the drunken binges and non-prescription pills...where is it going to end? Chief Caine and her rat horde, Oggie and his "recovered rapist memories" (or maybe only being raped is recovered, and the rest is unfortunately real, and he's using the recovered memory to try to assuage his guilt at raping young girls?), Avicenna's self-harm...fuck, the list just gets better and better. Now I really wonder what PZ has in his closet, unless it's the "false" rape accusation... :pray:

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21044

Post by Badger3k »

James Caruthers wrote:http://jezebel.com/watch-joss-whedon-ma ... 1460080685
Here's the relevant dick sucking-I mean, article, from Jezebel. I just have to laugh at feminists being angry over the term feminist. I'm sorry feminists, but it is modern feminists who have created the negative buzz around the word. You are going to have to lie in the beds you made. And saying "there is no middle ground" isn't likely to help the old image problems.

I doubt Whedon has to beg women for sex, but maybe he sees his support of feminism as a necessary counterbalance to the sexualization of female characters in his own films and tv shows.

And of course, not everyone in the comments are happy about this. Even though he is essentially lapping at the feminist clit, they feel it necessary to point and him and shout WHITE MALE TALKING ABOUT FEMINISM. Honestly, modern feminists are some of the most fucking sexist people I have ever seen. It does not matter what any man says about feminism, the fact he is talking about feminism is enough to complain at him. Then feminists turn around and say that feminism just means equal rights. I mean, seriously, what the fuck? Either let feminism mean equal rights, in which case men and women all have an equal say on equal rights, or make feminism a girl's club and let the men form their own movements for their own needs. I honestly don't care which, either would be better than what they are doing now.
Is that who is in the video clips? I never cared for his work, either on tv or comics, and cringe whenever I see his name on a project. At least he didn't fill the Avengers movie with his usual cliches (not that the Avengers and super-heroes in general have their own cliches).

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21045

Post by Dick Strawkins »

The vast majority of women refuse to claim the term feminist for themselves.

Going by his logic, this means that the majority of women don't simply see themselves as feminists, they don't see themselves as people!

I get the impression that we are just witnessing cable TV style logic - the type of simplistic arguments that only work with people who need to have the world spelled out to them in few words and extra large font. But since this proportion of the population is fairly large, it is profitable to exploit the market.
It's a slogan, just like "Fair and Balanced".

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21046

Post by Badger3k »

Guess I make a threefer? I just wanted to say that I really, really loved the threat from Monsenor towards LazySavant
Putting @LazySavant on notice. If I find any of his violent crime musings credible, I'll unceremoniously unfollow him. Block, if guilty.
Don't forget to Unfriend him on Facebook! That'll hurt him where it counts! Although, I think you're supposed to ask for a Leica rangefinder first. I barely use twitter myself, but the arrogant attitude of that guy is astonishing. Maybe he knows LS in real life, or is (was) a friend, but if not...what makes him think that he is worth anything, let alone enough to "give notice", and then the horrible threat of being unfollower or blocked if the sooper-geneus finds his musings "credible" (hmm, must ask the NSA about that...). The self-importance is laughable. But then, that seems to be the mindset of these people - self-righteous, self-important, completely unearned expectations of respect or obedience. To me, that makes poking them with virtual sticks a steady source of lulz.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21047

Post by Badger3k »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
The vast majority of women refuse to claim the term feminist for themselves.

Going by his logic, this means that the majority of women don't simply see themselves as feminists, they don't see themselves as people!

I get the impression that we are just witnessing cable TV style logic - the type of simplistic arguments that only work with people who need to have the world spelled out to them in few words and extra large font. But since this proportion of the population is fairly large, it is profitable to exploit the market.
It's a slogan, just like "Fair and Balanced".
That makes it all the easier to get my plan for Soylent Green passed into law. If they don't see themselves as people...

Trophy
.
.
Posts: 601
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 2:17 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21048

Post by Trophy »

Aneris wrote:For your reading pleasure.
Outrage World
How feminist blogs like Jezebel gin up page views by exploiting women's worst tendencies.


The issues in the atheist community, as also seen in Pinker's various tweets on censorious attitudes at campusses, are indeed symptom of a larger issue.
That was a very good read. And somehow that script looks very very familiar :think: One might even say we have been seeing in the past few years but I'm not so wire.

Gefan
.
.
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:55 pm
Location: In a handbasket, apparently.

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21049

Post by Gefan »

Chanty Binx's dating profile seeks "chivalry".

The mind reels.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21050

Post by Badger3k »

Skimming the feed brings up Ophie celebrating that Sweden- Bechdel test thing.

While at work I realized that some things, like the "one man" or "one woman" plays will fail completely. Puppetry of the Penis sure fails. Does this mean that the Vagina Monologues will also fail the test? I guess it is sexist. In the words of Ophelia Benson:
And if you don’t like it, it’s up to you as an individual to create an alternative. Your time starts now.

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3282
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21051

Post by Hunt »

Benson has a new post up citing some study about bug grinding sadists and that sadism comes in more frequent varieties than is normally believed. Oh, and of course, the pit is demonstrative.

Interestingly, part way down, someone favorably quotes M. Scott Peck:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-812352

For those unfamiliar, Peck is a batshit insane American psychiatrist who in essence believes that most psychological ills lie in conflicting allegiance between God and Satan. He believes in and has written about demonic possession. As I recall, I think he's also believes he's actually witnessed it. To him, sadism is caused by inattention to sin and is basically part way down the road to possession.

In other words... The day has come. You all knew it would arrive eventually. FtB has accused the pit of Satanism.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21052

Post by James Caruthers »

Gefan wrote:Chanty Binx's dating profile seeks "chivalry".

The mind reels.
http://stfueverything.tumblr.com/


This is supposedly Miz Binx' tumblr.

I don't know why she can't get a date. She's just looking for a man who will shut up for the fiftieth billionth time! It shouldn't be so hard to find a nice, chivalrous man for this modern feminist who is all about equality between men and women.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21053

Post by Badger3k »

Hunt wrote:Benson has a new post up citing some study about bug grinding sadists and that sadism comes in more frequent varieties than is normally believed. Oh, and of course, the pit is demonstrative.

Interestingly, part way down, someone favorably quotes M. Scott Peck:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-812352

For those unfamiliar, Peck is a batshit insane American psychiatrist who in essence believes that most psychological ills lie in conflicting allegiance between God and Satan. He believes in and has written about demonic possession. As I recall, I think he's also believes he's actually witnessed it. To him, sadism is caused by inattention to sin and is basically part way down the road to possession.

In other words... The day has come. You all knew it would arrive eventually. FtB has accused the pit of Satanism.
Funny thing - I just saw this post. Of course, it came in not as a full post like most on the FfTB main rss feed, but came in as part of a sentence and "read more". The first line was enough to give me nightmares: "So that study on sadism I've been meaning..."

Ophie in a dominatrix outfit...brrrrrrrrr....although, when thinking of Ophie, the first thing that really comes to mind:[youtube]zdIID_TGwhM[/youtube]

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21054

Post by Badger3k »

In the spirit of more videos, watching the flouncing of Morales and Caine...

[youtube]rY0WxgSXdEE[/youtube]

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21055

Post by Badger3k »

James Caruthers wrote:
Gefan wrote:Chanty Binx's dating profile seeks "chivalry".

The mind reels.
http://stfueverything.tumblr.com/


This is supposedly Miz Binx' tumblr.

I don't know why she can't get a date. She's just looking for a man who will shut up for the fiftieth billionth time! It shouldn't be so hard to find a nice, chivalrous man for this modern feminist who is all about equality between men and women.
Is Bartleby free? I can't tell from the picture, but he doesn't seem to have a ring on...plus, he might be a ginger - it's hard to tell in that pic. If true, that means he won't have to color his hair too much.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21056

Post by Ape+lust »

James Caruthers wrote:
Gefan wrote:Chanty Binx's dating profile seeks "chivalry".

The mind reels.
http://stfueverything.tumblr.com/


This is supposedly Miz Binx' tumblr.

I don't know why she can't get a date. She's just looking for a man who will shut up for the fiftieth billionth time! It shouldn't be so hard to find a nice, chivalrous man for this modern feminist who is all about equality between men and women.
She thinks not getting any is a measure of her awesomeness. Of course.

http://i.imgur.com/FmIv613.jpg

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21057

Post by Tony Parsehole »

James Caruthers wrote:From Zvanatee's latest manufactured controversy (comments section) we have this:
maudell: What’s with the Myra Hindley profile pictures? Did they change it along with the ‘Stephanie haz a sad’ name to add to the threat? I guess real life serial killer/rapist impersonations (with real life victims still alive) are all the rage among sociopaths.
I LOL'D

So someone makes a joke-> HARASSMENT AND EVIL THREATS
Someone edits their twitter to make it even more obvious it's a joke-> INCREASING THE EVIL THREATS
Someone goes looking on twatter for random people who bitch about her, then lies and says they're pitters-> A POOR VICTIM

I look forward to doing this all again next week when Ophie decided to go ego-fishing again.
Just doing my part to ensure the drama continues.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21058

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Pogsurf wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Oolon has family in the House of Lords?

http://i.imgur.com/GNhESUP.png

I wonder if he's related to peerage. Might explain how he can fuck off on the internet all day and collect a paycheck.
Anyone involved with local politics will know how laughable Oolon's threat to me was. If anything the rule is the more outrage you can generate in your political opponents the better you will spread your message.

So Oolon is directly related to a Lord? And this fucker tells us to check our privilege? LOL.
For the record, I'll believe it when there's a bit more evidence. This is Oolon after all. He'd lie about the weather.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21059

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Pogsurf wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Oolon has family in the House of Lords?

http://i.imgur.com/GNhESUP.png

I wonder if he's related to peerage. Might explain how he can fuck off on the internet all day and collect a paycheck.
Anyone involved with local politics will know how laughable Oolon's threat to me was. If anything the rule is the more outrage you can generate in your political opponents the better you will spread your message.

So Oolon is directly related to a Lord? And this fucker tells us to check our privilege? LOL.
For the record, I'll believe it when there's a bit more evidence. This is Oolon after all. He'd lie about the weather.
There is a "Baroness Billingham" in the house of Lords.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Bil ... Billingham

She appears to be the spitting image of a certain FTB rageblogger with a penchant for obsessively collecting lists of tweets and quote-mines of her opponents.

http://www.eventpics.biz/img/s10/v113/p1807217878-3.jpg

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#21060

Post by James Caruthers »

[youtube]qB0uITOg87w[/youtube]
Whatta shock, he was never a pitter.

Now get your fat ass off of the slymepit, zvan.

[youtube]_9V4C3kJ6M0[/youtube]







Trigger warning btw. :lol: Hey Ophie, am I doing the trigger warnings right?

Locked