Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
another lurker

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40276

Post by another lurker »

I will register right now!

I have more bitching to do too!

pandora
.
.
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:45 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40277

Post by pandora »

100 BILLION women alive on this planet right now who have been raped or beaten eh? Impressive.

I'm so sick of these stupid bitches telling me I should be afraid of my own fucking shadow. They demean real, actual rape by turning the slightest glance their way by any man into RAPE!!!11eleventy!!!. Obviously no-one read them "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" when they were children.

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40278

Post by Al Stefanelli »

franc wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:Found this gem in my Facecrack newsfeed:

http://wcoa.info/tffb.jpg
Have to follow that up with what fell into one of my feeds -

http://i.imgur.com/47SfD.jpg

Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
I wrote a letter of amicus curiae for a dude who kinda went through the same shit. His girlfriend cheated on him, so he fucked her friend or something. She went to his house and smashed in his big screen TV and threw his laptop in the dishwasher. He called the cops on her, to which she claimed all the damage was done while she was trying to 'escape' from him, and that he eventually caught her and brutally raped her.

Long story short, he's out of jail, she's in jail and his shit got replaced. Wasn't a pretty fight, though.

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40279

Post by Al Stefanelli »

pandora wrote:100 BILLION women alive on this planet right now who have been raped or beaten eh? Impressive.

I'm so sick of these stupid bitches telling me I should be afraid of my own fucking shadow. They demean real, actual rape by turning the slightest glance their way by any man into RAPE!!!11eleventy!!!. Obviously no-one read them "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" when they were children.
Hi, Pandora! Welcome to the Pit :)

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40280

Post by Gumby »

Ape+lust wrote: Oh, that's right. I missed that one third part. Revise that to 90-some women for every man in my other post. They should be able to shut down the atheist/skeptic "sausage fests" no problem.
Yeah no shit. We men must be very powerful, to run a successful Patriarchy against those odds.


All right folks, I'm outta here. Happy New Year. May 2013 be covered in Slyme.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40281

Post by franc »

another lurker wrote:Gumby, thank you for this conversation.

Finally, someone -normal- that I can talk to, other than my boyfriend.

The FTBullies are so warped, I feel like I have been living in an alternate universe, with noone to talk (bitch about ftb) to!
You're not allowed to like us. We're monsters.

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40282

Post by Eucliwood »

Al Stefanelli wrote:Found this gem in my Facecrack newsfeed:

http://wcoa.info/tffb.jpg

That is such fucking bullshit... all of the additional requirements for rape there as well as "full on" rape are done by women as well. Women manipulate, trick, or lie to men in order to get sex as well. As for the fucking people while they're lying there drugged up, women do that as well. They also do forced rape, with the help of other things (like I said, drugs)- rope, blunt objects, etc. This guy needs to quit pretending women are innocent of such things.

1/3 of women in the world have been raped? I guess they don't need citations but they'll squawk "citation!" when we mention something they know good and well happened and don't expect them to deny.

And stop being so sexist as well. Seriously, a man is not allowed to tell a woman he's not a rapist because it will give her a false sense of security? No one is allowed to tell a woman not all men are rapists it will give her a false sense of security? Upsetting, sexist, extremist bullshit. I wish I never read such crap.

mutleyeng
.
.
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:32 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40283

Post by mutleyeng »

Ape+lust wrote:
Revise that to 90-some women for every man in my other post. They should be able to shut down the atheist/skeptic "sausage fests" no problem.
someone should tell the Muslims they better off where they are

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40284

Post by Skep tickle »

Tigzy wrote:Ha-haaa. Skep Tickle, I see Sally Syringe has leapt into the fray armed with major herpaderps:

Yeah, “Skeptixx,” shockingly enough, women often do see connections between physical attacks that are motivated by misogyny and verbal attacks that are motivated by misogyny. Haven’t you seen those domestic violence warning signs pamphlets in the Planned Parenthood bathrooms? They all emphasize how domestic violence isn’t just hitting and punching, it’s also tearing down the victim’s self-esteem, telling her she’s worthless, etc.

Oh wait, you probably haven’t. There’s that pesky male privilege again!

Get the fuck over it. Your outrage about Ophelia’s alleged giant ego is unconvincing.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-397741

Almost as funny as when Illuminata called me a chill-girl.
Reminds me of getting a kiss-off letter from a grad school addressing me as "Mr. [Mylastname]", after I had not only applied & had letters of reference sent to them but had gone out to visit/interview in person. (A science department at MIT in the 1980's - they probably weren't all that used to women applicants.)

And since I apparently don't know when to stop:
http://i.imgur.com/v5Jss.png

(Hi Ophelia!)

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40285

Post by another lurker »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
franc wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:

Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
I wrote a letter of amicus curiae for a dude who kinda went through the same shit. His girlfriend cheated on him, so he fucked her friend or something. She went to his house and smashed in his big screen TV and threw his laptop in the dishwasher. He called the cops on her, to which she claimed all the damage was done while she was trying to 'escape' from him, and that he eventually caught her and brutally raped her.

Long story short, he's out of jail, she's in jail and his shit got replaced. Wasn't a pretty fight, though.

Al Stefanelli, your friend's misfortune reminds me of this Dave la Chappelle skit:


Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40286

Post by Altair »

Al Stefanelli wrote:Found this gem in my Facecrack newsfeed:

http://wcoa.info/tffb.jpg
Every time I read that I wonder if these people are truly that paranoid or they are faking it to control others or something like that. If they really think that, it really is a scary world they live in.

Also, he/she (although there's something with the blurred picture's color distribution that makes me think the poster is a woman) is telling this Gary person to tell women not to trust any man. That presents a bit of a logistics problem.

If Gary, a man, tells a woman not to trust any man, should she trust him and believe it? :think:

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40287

Post by franc »

Al Stefanelli wrote:I wrote a letter of amicus curiae for a dude who kinda went through the same shit. His girlfriend cheated on him, so he fucked her friend or something. She went to his house and smashed in his big screen TV and threw his laptop in the dishwasher. He called the cops on her, to which she claimed all the damage was done while she was trying to 'escape' from him, and that he eventually caught her and brutally raped her.

Long story short, he's out of jail, she's in jail and his shit got replaced. Wasn't a pretty fight, though.
War stories. Knew a guy that kicked one of these things out of his apartment and changed locks. Didn't matter. She broke in while he was out, then attacked him with a pair of scissors when he got home, only managing to slash the palm of his hand. Of course the neighbours called the cops. They separated them, had a good laugh at the 'lover's quarrel", told him not to bother with charges as they had prior records on him back at the station if he wanted to make a fuss, and gave the precious petal a ride home.

Now, reverse the genders.

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40288

Post by Al Stefanelli »

another lurker wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:
franc wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:

Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
I wrote a letter of amicus curiae for a dude who kinda went through the same shit. His girlfriend cheated on him, so he fucked her friend or something. She went to his house and smashed in his big screen TV and threw his laptop in the dishwasher. He called the cops on her, to which she claimed all the damage was done while she was trying to 'escape' from him, and that he eventually caught her and brutally raped her.

Long story short, he's out of jail, she's in jail and his shit got replaced. Wasn't a pretty fight, though.

Al Stefanelli, your friend's misfortune reminds me of this Dave la Chappelle skit:

Ha ha ha, I've seen that. Fucking hilarious! Been a while, thanks for the laughs

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40289

Post by another lurker »

Al Stefanelli, I accidentaly pasted the wrong link, and there seems to be no edit button.

Try this one:

http://www.myvidster.com/video/4145206/ ... Video_Clip_

If it does not work, it's probably blocked because Viacom is a douchebag company:((

Sorry!

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40290

Post by BarnOwl »

Tigzy wrote:Ha-haaa. Skep Tickle, I see Sally Syringe has leapt into the fray armed with major herpaderps:

Yeah, “Skeptixx,” shockingly enough, women often do see connections between physical attacks that are motivated by misogyny and verbal attacks that are motivated by misogyny. Haven’t you seen those domestic violence warning signs pamphlets in the Planned Parenthood bathrooms? They all emphasize how domestic violence isn’t just hitting and punching, it’s also tearing down the victim’s self-esteem, telling her she’s worthless, etc.

Oh wait, you probably haven’t. There’s that pesky male privilege again!

Get the fuck over it. Your outrage about Ophelia’s alleged giant ego is unconvincing.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ent-397741

Almost as funny as when Illuminata called me a chill-girl.
I think Sally just impaled herself on an irony rod.

jjbinx007
.
.
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:16 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40291

Post by jjbinx007 »

I nominate Richard Carrier as one of the worst people in 2012. His infamous "with-us-or-against-us" followed by a shit load of invective for anyone who didn't pledge 100% loyalty for the thing he just thought of 5 minutes ago really set the whole tone for Atheism+ and the whole baboonosphere.

Secondly, I propose from now on we fight fire with fire. Ophelia Benson, Rebecca Watson, Burly Amish and co do not have the right to speak on, for or on behalf of men or men's issues.

mutleyeng
.
.
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:32 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40292

Post by mutleyeng »

I dont know about the worse person, but JT was easily the one who most made me want to slap him around the face with a dead fish....for his "what about love?" bollocks at skepticon 5 - that was just offensive

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40293

Post by Al Stefanelli »

Altair wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:Found this gem in my Facecrack newsfeed:

http://wcoa.info/tffb.jpg
Every time I read that I wonder if these people are truly that paranoid or they are faking it to control others or something like that. If they really think that, it really is a scary world they live in.

Also, he/she (although there's something with the blurred picture's color distribution that makes me think the poster is a woman) is telling this Gary person to tell women not to trust any man. That presents a bit of a logistics problem.

If Gary, a man, tells a woman not to trust any man, should she trust him and believe it? :think:
Yeah, the poster is a woman. I didn't include her pic or name because I am not sure if her page is private or public. Gary, however, ripped her a new asshole, and but good, too:

http://www.wcoa.info/tffb2.jpg

Plonk
.
.
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:50 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40294

Post by Plonk »


Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40295

Post by Darren »

franc wrote:Have to follow that up with what fell into one of my feeds -

http://i.imgur.com/47SfD.jpg

Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
Whoa... you're not chanelling Matt Dillahunty there, are you franc?

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40296

Post by Eucliwood »

franc wrote:
War stories. Knew a guy that kicked one of these things out of his apartment and changed locks. Didn't matter. She broke in while he was out, then attacked him with a pair of scissors when he got home, only managing to slash the palm of his hand. Of course the neighbours called the cops. They separated them, had a good laugh at the 'lover's quarrel", told him not to bother with charges as they had prior records on him back at the station if he wanted to make a fuss, and gave the precious petal a ride home.

Now, reverse the genders.
That's horrible :/ Those cops are sexist scum. That is so wrong.
But why should I be surprised at the scissors incident... when there are cops who will tell someone to "man up" when their girlfriend gives them a concussion. I have a friend who was severely abused by an ex wife... both times help was brought (once by her against him.. :roll: ) HE was the one that got screwed over. Once when he pushed her (she had been beating on him)- she told the courts he was abusive. when she admitted and told them in detail exactly how she was the abusive one, they said she was just saying that because she was afraid. She continued to insist, so the judge said that he should have "left" if he was being abused. Then there are the clearly sexist abuse laws.

Then there's that time he had hundreds of cuts all over his body, called in because he was suicidal. On the phone he had to push her away, she squawked (perhaps for their attention.. hmm), and then somehow HE was the one in trouble. The nurse told him he wasn't suicidal "because the cuts weren't deep enough."
Darren wrote:
Whoa... you're not chanelling Matt Dillahunty there, are you franc?
I understand his point if he meant its irrelevant because some people actually think like that!

JTC
.
.
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:23 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40297

Post by JTC »

Happy New Year Pit. I read the entire thread over these few weeks and it's been a trip. Thanks for keeping these fuckwads in check and it's been pleasure conversing with a few of you over twitter. You're a solid group of people and all the hyperbolic nonsense I used to read about "The Pit" on FTB is just that.... nonsense.

Take care friends,

Jerry Conlon

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40298

Post by Steersman »

Rystefn wrote:
Steersman wrote:
Rystefn wrote:
Steersman wrote: Maybe you would like to post your photograph so she can take potshots at your looks too? ….
So it's fair for me to call her a horse-faced hag, right? Because she's a horse-faced hag.
Certainly seems fair considering that you’ve posted your own photo. Although I wonder how you’d feel if you looked like Don Knotts or Quasimodo instead of the Marlboro Man [if a somewhat studious/punkish version] ….
Hey, it's not my fault I'm so damned pretty.
Tough job; someone has to do it.

Although it seems that sexual desireability is not all that it is cracked up to be (very little is, I’ve found: I remember reading that Charles Dickens, I think, happened to have spent his honeymoon visiting Niagara Falls and when asked about it said that it was the second biggest disappointment of his trip – an acquired taste).

But read an interesting article on the perspective over on a site I’d found in searching about InMalafide. And then there are the cases like Playboy Playmate Dorothy Stratten and Deep Throat star Linda Lovelace who described the “callous and exploitative practices in the pornography industry” – lots of people get chewed-up and spit out the other end of that process which is largely predicated on sexual desireability – or rather on its “intersection” with other social values and perspectives.

Reminds me of something that I think Jacob Bronowski [The Ascent of Man] said about similar situations: “For the environment exacts a price for the survival of the fittest; it captures them” – although one needs to put “fittest” in quotes to emphasize its relativity ….

xinit
.
.
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40299

Post by xinit »

Reap wrote:Ok I need everyone to list your TOP 5 jerk-face, moron, fuck-wad,A+ idiots or FTB assholes for my end of the year list. No need to give reasons why and if you think that more than 1 can fit in as number 1, thats ok. I'm not sure the best way to tally it. List it here unless it gets messy I guess? Or if you cant risk posting it here then hit me up on FB (Reap Paden) Polls close at 11:59pm pst Jan 1
Greg Laden IS my top 5.

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40300

Post by Al Stefanelli »

JTC wrote:Happy New Year Pit. I read the entire thread over these few weeks and it's been a trip. Thanks for keeping these fuckwads in check and it's been pleasure conversing with a few of you over twitter. You're a solid group of people and all the hyperbolic nonsense I used to read about "The Pit" on FTB is just that.... nonsense.

Take care friends,

Jerry Conlon
Happy New Year, to you, too, Jerry. When you got time, pull up a chair and chat a while.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40301

Post by Lsuoma »

Top 5:

1. The Huge Zvanatee
2. Cobweb Cunt
3. Twatson
4. Peezus
5. Two-cows

Grag and colon just don't make it - they are too ineffectual.

Laugh of the Year: A+Theism - how does that fucking work, eh? Oh, that's right. It doesn't.

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40302

Post by Eucliwood »

Question... there was a woman I came across on YA who had gotten pregnant with her boyfriend - while he was asleep. Would he have to pay child support if he decided to leave her? And what would Atheism +'s take be on this? They'd probably be all "omg, he should have to pay for the child! How can he not take care of his child?! She's pregnant and ON HER OWN OMG"

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40303

Post by Darren »

Completely irrelevant, but I just saw this in my twitter feed:

http://i.imgur.com/YteQH.png

Sure enough, if you do a Google search for that phrase, her blog comes up on top. So, if you have a few spare seconds, why not Google "what are your consequences if genealogy isn't taken seriously" (without the quotes), and click on Miranda's blog. Sometimes I just like fucking with people :P

xinit
.
.
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40304

Post by xinit »

Maximus wrote:Top 5:
5- Matt Dillahunty. Not being able to apply skepticism to his sacred cows.
Well, until his sacred cows shat on his head in the A+ forums...

dougal445
.
.
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40305

Post by dougal445 »

O thunderf00ts video:

Did any one notice at 03:47 how PZ "scratched" his forehead?
Do you think PZ he knew he was telling a lie?

Happy new year all!!

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40306

Post by franc »

Darren wrote:
franc wrote:Have to follow that up with what fell into one of my feeds -

http://i.imgur.com/47SfD.jpg

Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
Whoa... you're not chanelling Matt Dillahunty there, are you franc?
Touché. But I am not going to claim an imgur image is gospel truth, a la Myers and the Great Fish Massacre. I did search but couldn't find anything, thus disclaimer. But eerily similar to past experience -

He: The real estate just called. They say they haven't gotten the rent. You did pay it didn't you?
She (sporting new ipod and cellphone): Of course I did sweetie.
He: Can I have the receipt?
She: (lips purse, various excuses)
He: Let's go to the real estate and sort it then
She: YOU WON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT (more excuses, some screaming, counter accusations, storms out of flat to call cops that she's terrified for her life from crazy boyfriend)

Etc. A drama that is played out in one variant or another every second of every day.

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40307

Post by Altair »

I hoped they would think a little bit after reading Skeptixx's awesome post at B&W and would try to answer the points she raised (yes, I know, I should know better by now), but all we got was the usual crap from Stacy
Stacy wrote:
Cutee wrote: Ophelia Benson USED (yes, I said it) the brutalizing of a rape victim to further enhance the opinion, in some people’s minds, that she is a victim of anything even approaching this
No she didn’t, shithead. Only somebody who can’t read for comprehension–e.g., a slimepitster–could get that from what Ophelia wrote.

skeptixx, duness, et al–you are making this thread–which, for the reading impaired, is about rape culture, and how it impacts women in small as well as horrific ways–all about you and your campaign against Ophelia.

You are disgusting people. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves, but I suspect you’re incapable of shame, or of honest self-reflection to any degree whatsoever. Fuck off, and take teh stoopid with you, kthxbai.
Now, whoever Cutee and Duness are, they have been branded pitters. Well, actually pitsters, but we get the idea. Maybe we'll see them register here in the next days?

It's also interesting how the victim's male friend is usually hand-waved away. He survived and what happened to him was not as bad as what happened to her, but, as Ophelia herself acknowledged in her post, he was also beat up, stripped and thrown off the bus with her.

That doesn't jive with the "rape culture" and "misogyny" angles, so the guy is never mentioned in these kind of articles.

In closing, I agreee with Skep Tickle, although I make the point less eloquently than she does. It must be that male privilege she hasn't checked in ages.

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40308

Post by Eucliwood »

Altair wrote:I hoped they would think a little bit after reading Skeptixx's awesome post at B&W and would try to answer the points she raised (yes, I know, I should know better by now), but all we got was the usual crap from Stacy
Stacy wrote:
Cutee wrote: Ophelia Benson USED (yes, I said it) the brutalizing of a rape victim to further enhance the opinion, in some people’s minds, that she is a victim of anything even approaching this
No she didn’t, shithead. Only somebody who can’t read for comprehension–e.g., a slimepitster–could get that from what Ophelia wrote.

skeptixx, duness, et al–you are making this thread–which, for the reading impaired, is about rape culture, and how it impacts women in small as well as horrific ways–all about you and your campaign against Ophelia.

You are disgusting people. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves, but I suspect you’re incapable of shame, or of honest self-reflection to any degree whatsoever. Fuck off, and take teh stoopid with you, kthxbai.
Now, whoever Cutee and Duness are, they have been branded pitters. Well, actually pitsters, but we get the idea. Maybe we'll see them register here in the next days?

It's also interesting how the victim's male friend is usually hand-waved away. He survived and what happened to him was not as bad as what happened to her, but, as Ophelia herself acknowledged in her post, he was also beat up, stripped and thrown off the bus with her.

That doesn't jive with the "rape culture" and "misogyny" angles, so the guy is never mentioned in these kind of articles.

In closing, I agreee with Skep Tickle, although I make the point less eloquently than she does. It must be that male privilege she hasn't checked in ages.
right... stacy.. ever think that maybe if it was posted by someone ELSE who didn't go on about themselves after posting it that they'd talk about the post rather than chiming in to support her post?

AchronTimeless
.
.
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Somewhere out of my mind

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40309

Post by AchronTimeless »

franc wrote: Touché. But I am not going to claim an imgur image is gospel truth, a la Myers and the Great Fish Massacre. I did search but couldn't find anything, thus disclaimer. But eerily similar to past experience -

He: The real estate just called. They say they haven't gotten the rent. You did pay it didn't you?
She (sporting new ipod and cellphone): Of course I did sweetie.
He: Can I have the receipt?
She: (lips purse, various excuses)
He: Let's go to the real estate and sort it then
She: YOU WON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT (more excuses, some screaming, counter accusations, storms out of flat to call cops that she's terrified for her life from crazy boyfriend)

Etc. A drama that is played out in one variant or another every second of every day.
Yikes. That sounds eerily familiar. Granted, the way I got out of it was she had already violated her parole by not getting routine drug tests, so to falsely file a report, she'd have to go to the police and be arrested right after.

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40310

Post by Al Stefanelli »

Four Hundred

AchronTimeless
.
.
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Somewhere out of my mind

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40311

Post by AchronTimeless »

Al Stefanelli wrote:Four Hundred
Eucli's post count?

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40312

Post by another lurker »

I don't really have much of a problem with Ophelia - but then again, I have only read her blog on/off for a short while. In short, I know nothing.

I just watched Thunderf00ts video however, and he characterizes many FTBers as 'professional victims' and that sounds about right.

dougal445
.
.
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40313

Post by dougal445 »

AchronTimeless wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:Four Hundred
Eucli's post count?
How many hats?

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40314

Post by Eucliwood »

AchronTimeless wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:Four Hundred
Eucli's post count?
Er no, but you could stop being so obsessed with me? You've already tried net stalking me. It's bad enough that you now know you live near me and joked about running me over - no idea if you'd NOT do it though. Everyone knows one psychopath... I don't want to be lesbiraped in my sleep.So please no more name mentions so that your obsession calms down.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40315

Post by Skep tickle »

Altair wrote:... It's also interesting how the victim's male friend is usually hand-waved away. He survived and what happened to him was not as bad as what happened to her, but, as Ophelia herself acknowledged in her post, he was also beat up, stripped and thrown off the bus with her.

That doesn't jive with the "rape culture" and "misogyny" angles, so the guy is never mentioned in these kind of articles. ...
Good point. I haven't been following the news reports & what I've heard only barely mentioned the man. It'd be great if he were mentioned more often & more prominently as a victim in the attack, not cast to the side of the road (yet again).

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40316

Post by Pitchguest »

JTC wrote:Happy New Year Pit. I read the entire thread over these few weeks and it's been a trip. Thanks for keeping these fuckwads in check and it's been pleasure conversing with a few of you over twitter. You're a solid group of people and all the hyperbolic nonsense I used to read about "The Pit" on FTB is just that.... nonsense.

Take care friends,

Jerry Conlon
Cheers, Jerry. Love your work, keep it up. :handgestures-thumbup:

Al Stefanelli
.
.
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40317

Post by Al Stefanelli »

Eucliwood wrote:lesbiraped
Well played, Eucli.

'Four Hundred' was in reference to my own post count, because there are those on certain blogging networks that seem to be obsessed with my post count here. Just reminding them, is all.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40318

Post by Lsuoma »

AchronTimeless wrote:
Al Stefanelli wrote:Four Hundred
Eucli's post count?
Per hour?

jimthepleb
.
.
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am
Location: you kay?

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40319

Post by jimthepleb »

This Indian rape story is more about class/caste than any other factor.
It's odd that the victim hasn't been named yet.
I hadn't realised that Ophie has moved to India though. I take back all my disbelief about her living in a misogynist culture.

real horrorshow
.
.
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
Location: In a band of brigands.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40320

Post by real horrorshow »

bubblesort wrote: I like that quote, but I see privilege theory arguments as inherently Marxist rather than Stalinist (although Stalinism was kind of Marxist, I guess). The privilege check police seek to divide us into classes in order to create class conflict because their framework falls apart without class conflict. I've found that most people on A+ and even other non-atheist and non-activist forums I frequent who are the loudest privilege-check police are almost always Marxist. I've noticed a surge of Marxists in online communities over the past month or so, and they aren't always advocating privilege checks, sometimes they try to argue things like value theory.
Stalinism was only Marxist for as long as Stalin needed to seem Leninist. I don't think Stalin read much Marx, and what he did read he plainly did not understand. Once Lenin was dead, and various rivals were out of the way, Stalin could openly be what he'd always been: Stalinist. After that, economics and class theory were only window dressing for the real agenda: The ruthless and capricious wielding of total power by someone totally unfitted for authority of any kind.

Be grateful these little Web Warriors are only able to conduct their show trials and fulfil their execution quotas virtually. If they had real power it would be really ugly. Not that these runts are potential replicas of Stalin of course. They more like your low-ranking NKVD goon. Beating lest they be beaten.

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40321

Post by another lurker »

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-519888
Well, your job, blar, is to answer Joe Public’s stupid questions. If Joe Public goes on a private blog, gets in the middle of a discussion about feminism and expects everyone to halt and answer whatever stupid questions he has- it’s not our job to answer and we don’t owe him the courtesy of being polite to him.
This backs up my earlier point. They do not care to educate and convert the public. They just want a soapbox from which to berate people. It's all about fluffing up their fragile egos.

AchronTimeless
.
.
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Somewhere out of my mind

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40322

Post by AchronTimeless »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
Eucliwood wrote:lesbiraped
Well played, Eucli.

'Four Hundred' was in reference to my own post count, because there are those on certain blogging networks that seem to be obsessed with my post count here. Just reminding them, is all.
Ah, well, at least it took you months to get there instead of days. Your posts are like a fine wine, best when aged and taken in satisfying sips.

Also, still got the dolt blocked, but that's a "word" I can only imagine coming from a FTB reject.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40323

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Stephany Zwan says HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!!!

http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/201 ... ver-g1.gif

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40324

Post by JackRayner »

Al Stefanelli wrote:Found this gem in my Facecrack newsfeed:

http://wcoa.info/tffb.jpg
Yes. You see that, womyn of the world?! You are NEVER SAFE! No matter where you are, or who you're with, and especially NOT if it is a male! The violence, which is only ever committed my menz, makes ALL of us menz stronger! Even if the violence is being committed on us the great majority of the time, we ALL benefit from it!

So hide! Run! Live in fear, womynkind! GASSSP! :o LOOK OUT! BEHIND YOU-

Eucliwood
.
.
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:25 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40325

Post by Eucliwood »

Al Stefanelli wrote:
Eucliwood wrote:lesbiraped
Well played, Eucli.

'Four Hundred' was in reference to my own post count, because there are those on certain blogging networks that seem to be obsessed with my post count here. Just reminding them, is all.

Al, what an honor - how does it feel to have been witch of the week? Do you look forward to being witch of next week if they do not find someone else to talk about?
AchronTimeless wrote: Also, still got the dolt blocked, but that's a "word" I can only imagine coming from a FTB reject.
HAHAHA... all this post needs is a bit of irony - Is AchronTimeless banned from ANY of the Freethought Blogs? 'Cause I'm not, as far as I know. I'm still welcome to post at any of the blogs I choose.

Can someone tell me if AchronTimeless is even a bit of an FTB reject?

Anyway, the word "lesbiraped" has jackshit to do with FTB. If I'd never heard of the people at FTB, I would still be using the word. Total non sequitur. What a dumb ass.

Even if you can't see this, Achron, I hope you feel it. Do not refer me without a title - "mistress" "sama" "hime" or "your majesty" will do fine. I don't want subshit scum referring to me so casually. *sips tea*

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40326

Post by Mykeru »

jimthepleb wrote:Happy New Year Pitters
Where's my hat? I feel naked.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8218/8331 ... 5651_o.jpg

masakari2012
.
.
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40327

Post by masakari2012 »

I won't be here in an hour, so Happy Fucking New Years! (in my time zone)

xinit
.
.
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40328

Post by xinit »

Lsuoma wrote:BTW, I'm just baking four dozen prosciutto and gruyère pinwheels. They'll be out of the oven in about 15 minutes. I'm in Atherton this evening, so if anyone want to pop round a grab a couple while they're still warm, feel free to do so. It's the house with the silver 2005 Honda CR-V and the red 1994 Miata parked outside.
Is this one of those Craigslist things? "Don't worry if we don't answer the door - there's a key in the flower pot. Just come in. There's a little game we like to play when people drop by... 'WHO ARE YOU, AND WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MY KITCHEN? I'M CALLING THE COPS!'"

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40329

Post by sacha »

somedumbguy wrote:FWIW, my stuff pulled out of my arse, is based on real world story after real world story after real world story.

And based on existence of the Innocence Project, and based on micro-economic incentive theory and based on an understanding of statistical analysis and statistical processes.
somedumbguy wrote:FWIW, my stuff pulled out of my arse, is based on real world story after real world story after real world story.

And based on existence of the Innocence Project, and based on micro-economic incentive theory and based on an understanding of statistical analysis and statistical processes.
unfortunately there isn't an accurate way to get the numbers. I have an excessive amount of anecdotes, and I don't expect anyone to consider that evidence of anything, which is one of the reasons I won't debate the point.
I cannot prove what I know to someone who doubts how common this is, because the majority of women are not going to admit anything like this, and they are not getting caught because the laws are in their favour. They know how easy it is to take advantage of the system. Crying wolf harms the real victims, but it significantly benefits the vindictive, especially when it comes to children and money, and there may be even more benefit with accusations of rape, because it is so difficult to prove innocence with the way the legal system is set up in the western world.

What is interesting is that many of those who doubt how often this happens, will agree that they have known a significant amount of women who were vindictive towards men who wanted out of the relationship, or who were not as interested as they were, or it was just sex and she knew that from the beginning, but hoped for more, or he never called after few dates. Nearly all adult men and women have been on the receiving end at least once. The difference is the reaction. How many women who find themselves in this situation react by wanting to hurt the person deliberately. Everyone has felt emotional pain caused by unrequited feelings, but when it comes to men, my experience has been that an extremely small minority become vindictive, but when it comes to the a majority of women, the pain immediately turns to animosity which for many becomes hostility and persecution. This is not new or unusual.

"Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned - Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned." -William Congreve 1695.

If that many women are capable of malice simply because a man does not feel the same way, why would it surprise anyone that there are numerous women who take it to the extreme?

Quite honestly I do not understand how it manifests that way for so many. I've never felt animosity towards someone because they did not feel the way I did. Pain, of course, sadness, but that never changed the way I felt about them, or made me want to see them suffer.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40330

Post by Mykeru »

Skep tickle wrote: http://i.imgur.com/v5Jss.png

(Hi Ophelia!)
So, as I understand it now, her comment about me supposedly gearing up to shoot Rebecca Watson (which I'm still irritated about) wasn't a one-off. In Ophelia's paranoia fueled by self importance world, anyone who is a critic of her and hers is a potential gunman.

I don't know how she types. Her monitor must be smeared with oozed craziness.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40331

Post by Lsuoma »

Eucliwood wrote:
AchronTimeless wrote: Also, still got the dolt blocked, but that's a "word" I can only imagine coming from a FTB reject.
HAHAHA... all this post needs is a bit of irony - Is AchronTimeless banned from ANY of the Freethought Blogs? 'Cause I'm not, as far as I know. I'm still welcome to post at any of the blogs I choose.

Can someone tell me if AchronTimeless is even a bit of an FTB reject?

Anyway, the word "lesbiraped" has jackshit to do with FTB. If I'd never heard of the people at FTB, I would still be using the word. Total non sequitur. What a dumb ass.

Even if you can't see this, Achron, I hope you feel it. Do not refer me without a title - "mistress" "sama" "hime" or "your majesty" will do fine. I don't want subshit scum referring to me so casually. *sips tea*
Dale called...

xinit
.
.
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40332

Post by xinit »

franc wrote: Dummy or real is irrelevant. I can hear echoes of similar psychodramatics from maniacs of the past. If real, don't see the point of masking identities if the morons don't bother themselves.
I only mask identities when I post screencaps to Facebook - I run an atheist page and I've had a 24 hour and a 72 hour ban over images being flagged. People who come to the page, post the dumbest shit on my wall, have their ass handed to them, and then they delete the thread. I started capturing these conversations to avoid losing them.

Facebook calls it "bullying" or some sort of bullshit.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40333

Post by Lsuoma »

xinit wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:BTW, I'm just baking four dozen prosciutto and gruyère pinwheels. They'll be out of the oven in about 15 minutes. I'm in Atherton this evening, so if anyone want to pop round a grab a couple while they're still warm, feel free to do so. It's the house with the silver 2005 Honda CR-V and the red 1994 Miata parked outside.
Is this one of those Craigslist things? "Don't worry if we don't answer the door - there's a key in the flower pot. Just come in. There's a little game we like to play when people drop by... 'WHO ARE YOU, AND WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN MY KITCHEN? I'M CALLING THE COPS!'"
OMFG!!!! I'm being raped by xinit!!! Haaalp!

KiwiIO unplugged

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40334

Post by KiwiIO unplugged »

Mykeru wrote:
jimthepleb wrote:Happy New Year Pitters
Where's my hat? I feel naked.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8218/8331 ... 5651_o.jpg
Why do I feel like I've woken up in Liddsville?

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#40335

Post by Steersman »

sacha wrote:
somedumbguy wrote:FWIW, my stuff pulled out of my arse, is based on real world story after real world story after real world story.

And based on existence of the Innocence Project, and based on micro-economic incentive theory and based on an understanding of statistical analysis and statistical processes.
[spoiler]unfortunately there isn't an accurate way to get the numbers. I have an excessive amount of anecdotes, and I don't expect anyone to consider that evidence of anything, which is one of the reasons I won't debate the point.
I cannot prove what I know to someone who doubts how common this is, because the majority of women are not going to admit anything like this, and they are not getting caught because the laws are in their favour. They know how easy it is to take advantage of the system. Crying wolf harms the real victims, but it significantly benefits the vindictive, especially when it comes to children and money, and there may be even more benefit with accusations of rape, because it is so difficult to prove innocence with the way the legal system is set up in the western world.

What is interesting is that many of those who doubt how often this happens, will agree that they have known a significant amount of women who were vindictive towards men who wanted out of the relationship, or who were not as interested as they were, or it was just sex and she knew that from the beginning, but hoped for more, or he never called after few dates. Nearly all adult men and women have been on the receiving end at least once. The difference is the reaction. How many women who find themselves in this situation react by wanting to hurt the person deliberately. Everyone has felt emotional pain caused by unrequited feelings, but when it comes to men, my experience has been that an extremely small minority become vindictive, but when it comes to the a majority of women, the pain immediately turns to animosity which for many becomes hostility and persecution. This is not new or unusual.[/spoiler]
"Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned - Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned." -William Congreve 1695.

If that many women are capable of malice simply because a man does not feel the same way, why would it surprise anyone that there are numerous women who take it to the extreme?

Quite honestly I do not understand how it manifests that way for so many. I've never felt animosity towards someone because they did not feel the way I did. Pain, of course, sadness, but that never changed the way I felt about them, or made me want to see them suffer.
That’s why you’re the head of GTI …. :-)

Locked