Re: Periodic Table of Swearing
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:01 am
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=montoya
Still 3rd entry. oh, you get the schtick...
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
Steersman wrote something that made me laugh until tears came, it's a miracle. Oh god, I think I hurt something.Steersman wrote:
But I’m still at a loss as to the meaning of “/Montoyaâ€, even after checking Wikipedia ….
THE DEGREDATION OF MY PEOPLE!!!!!!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!I know, that as soon as my child leaves my home and moves into his own place that he will be looking at porn immediately. I know that I am raising a problem for women. I know that this child will one day grow and will fully absorb the messages that porn sends to men. I know that my child masturbates to degradation of my people (when I use that phrase I mean (womyn) and that with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
Cos women NEVER masturbate.Tony Parsehole wrote:HAHAHAHAHAH! The Biting Beaver article is amazing!
Love this bit:THE DEGREDATION OF MY PEOPLE!!!!!!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!I know, that as soon as my child leaves my home and moves into his own place that he will be looking at porn immediately. I know that I am raising a problem for women. I know that this child will one day grow and will fully absorb the messages that porn sends to men. I know that my child masturbates to degradation of my people (when I use that phrase I mean (womyn) and that with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
Dear god woman don't you know that teenage lads enjoy having a private wank? I found a page from a porno mag on a railway track when I was about 12 and using that one page I turned my bedroom into a wanking-oven for about 6 months. I *almost* feel sorry for teenage boys nowadays. Having such a cornucopia of masturbation material at the click of a button means they must have no social lives whatsoever.
Hitch22 should be one of the last books of his you read. It's a personal story. Once you are familiar with his perspective on the subjects that he was passionate enough to write about (both definitions of passionate), including his many articles for Vanity Fair, Slate, and other publications, you may be interested to find out how he came to be who he was, that is when you read Hitch22.Steersman wrote:While I have read very little of him, I am certainly willing to concede that he seems also to have had a sensible perspective on and insight into quite a number of topics. And I’ve got “Hitch 22†on my to-read list.
I was going by this:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:You don't even know that, you imperfect you!sacha wrote:Hitch's imperfections made me love him even more, although Phil and I have very different perceptions of what his imperfections were.
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Hitch was a whiney cunt in more than one ways. Some of his "revolutionary" positions I could never live with. I don't give a fuck if you insult him. Show me where I ever expressed sensitivity when it comes to insulting Hitchens. He was a drunk, a fatty, a smoker, a Brit, a Leftist...
Never heard of it. But I’ve found the best way to develop a skill, to increase one’s power and technique – chess playing, for example – is to practice it, to play it with others. There are many different techniques and gambits in every game – not every one is guaranteed to be a winner in every circumstance.sacha wrote:You know that game called Don't Give Away Your Power? I complemented welch for being a master player.Steersman wrote:But bad karma I think to put anybody on too high a pedestal that we lose sight of their humanity and their clay feet.
That’s either hyperbole or “an irrational response†….sacha wrote:Hitch was ruler of the universe...
Looks a little sensitive to me, a little bit "aggrieved" at the suggestion that Hitch might have written rubbish.sacha wrote:Hitch used to write for Slate!Outwest wrote: Anyway...Slate? They'll publish anyone's rubbish. I've seen articles by PZ Myers in their a couple of times.
And people used to believe that the world was flat and at the center of the universe too. Which, of course, did not change matters much. Likewise with karma – I sort of expect it is a variation on one of Newton’s laws – every action has an equal and opposite reaction; considering that it works so well in cosmology it would seem to be somewhat of a stretch to think that something along that line wouldn't have some relevance to interpersonal relations: actions have consequeces, not all of which can be foreseen.I don't believe in Karma.
We are both franc's socks, and you know it.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Attack =/= insult. And I'm the fucking English-as-a-second-fucking-language guy here.
Also, Franc is Franc, Sacha is Sacha, and I'm me. Don't play the FTB game of guilt by association.
You may win even more than 99.9% of the time if you ask me about those subjects, but the challenge would be to get me to give a fuck about my lack of knowledge in those sporting events.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:if you're desperate for a win, ask me about American Football, Baseball, Basketball or Ice Hockey. That's a 99.9% win for you.
Yeah, a pack of wild, hungry, coyotes surrounding me in the dark woods would make me feel totally safe too.The coyotes closing in around me brought smiles to my lips and a sense of wonder and childlike safety and good humor.
I suppose if the imaginary men had legally obtained their imaginary beer then the situation would be less "bone chilling"?The thought of a group of young men sneaking into the park after hours to drink a stolen or illegally bought 6 pack of beer was bone chilling.
Polar bear.It occured to me then that there is no animal on this proud planet that is more dangerous to a lone woman than a man.
There were no men, terrorist or otherwise, in the woods with her. She just imagined what might happen if some happened to show up. Chalk up another win for paranoia, misandry and feminist neurosis.Chalk up yet another win for the terrorism of man.
You’re being obtuse Phil. I’m not saying that I didn’t Google Montoya nor look at the Wikipedia article - I did. I’m saying, for the second time, that none of those links led directly to the specific movie and character and phrase and internet meme. If there are a couple of million different possibilities I'm not going to waste my time tracking any of them down except maybe a few at the top of the lists - which didn't get me any closer to the goal line.
How the hell would you know that? I should send you the links and searches I’ve done and exported to a file. I don’t know how many links there are, but there’s some 200 pages of them, although I’m not sure why I bother – “sipping at the firehoseâ€, indeed. And those are only the links I’ve thought worth keeping.sacha wrote:….Steersman wrote:While I have read very little of him, I am certainly willing to concede that he seems also to have had a sensible perspective on and insight into quite a number of topics. And I’ve got “Hitch 22†on my to-read list.
I know that Google searches are Kryptonite to you, so here is some help:
Anonymous are overrated. Remember the declaration of war on Scientology? That sounded awesome. What did they achieve of the stated goals? Jackshit.Philip of Tealand wrote:It appears that those poor, hate fuelled, religious bigots from Westboro Baptists are being picked on by Anonymous
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/18/ano ... ket-plans/
I almost feel sorry for them
Honest
BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!
You don't say!The other thing about Hitch was that he had a sense of humor - so fucking rare in the A/S community these days.
sacha wrote:You know that game called Don't Give Away Your Power? I complemented welch for being a master player.Steersman wrote:But bad karma I think to put anybody on too high a pedestal that we lose sight of their humanity and their clay feet.
Hitch was ruler of the universe...
I don't believe in Karma.
Ah fuckin hell, that Biting Beaver is a piece of work :lol: Brandon, if you're watching, try getting into the habit of cracking a couple off to pictures of womyn in dungarees. I'm sure mom would approve then.Tony Parsehole wrote:HAHAHAHAHAH! The Biting Beaver article is amazing!
Love this bit:THE DEGREDATION OF MY PEOPLE!!!!!!! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!I know, that as soon as my child leaves my home and moves into his own place that he will be looking at porn immediately. I know that I am raising a problem for women. I know that this child will one day grow and will fully absorb the messages that porn sends to men. I know that my child masturbates to degradation of my people (when I use that phrase I mean (womyn) and that with every orgasm he will further solidify his own hatred of and superiority over, women.
Dear god woman don't you know that teenage lads enjoy having a private wank? I found a page from a porno mag on a railway track when I was about 12 and using that one page I turned my bedroom into a wanking-oven for about 6 months. I *almost* feel sorry for teenage boys nowadays. Having such a cornucopia of masturbation material at the click of a button means they must have no social lives whatsoever.
In my days that was porn! :shock:Tony Parsehole wrote:Where you thought from a distance it looked like a nice bit of naked lady magazine but after a closer inspection turned out to be a page from a Freeman's catalogue?
Me and my missus were just talking about this the other day. Why is there always a single shoe or a boot on the side of a road? How did it get there? Surely somebody would miss a single shoe and it would be harder to walk with one shoe than no shoes wouldn't it?Tigzy wrote:one time.
Speaking of unkempt railway sidings, overgrown bits of waste ground etc. - ever encounter the strange phenomenon of the Abandonded Adidas? You know, the lone trainer you'd always find in those places. Funny how there was always one, never a pair - even though it was not unusual to find a discarded sweater or jumper nearby.
A couple years ago, on YouTube, a woman who back then was known as BooBoo, got mad at a male friend for commenting on a video by someone she didn't like. She threatened to dick-drop some naked pics she had of him if he didn't start behaving in ways she approved of. She also threatened to make an Encyclopedia Dramatica page on him including the pics. I made this vid about it:sacha wrote:Men rarely admit it, much less report it.
and women are able to rape men easier than you think. If the man fights back, she calls the police, and he is taken away (mandatory in the US if it is a domestic violence dispute).
or, they can just threaten to scream "rape".
I've heard of women threatening to tell everyone the man is impotent if he does not have sex with them, or that he's a paedophile...
women don't need physical strength, they have blackmail.
they also have roofies
Great post!welch wrote:here, a longer version of what I'm on about: http://dissentionisnothate.wordpress.co ... ca-watson/
Don't you mean Ena Sharples?Tigzy wrote: Nope, never encountered a porn mirage - in all honesty, the women's underwear section of a Freeman's would have still counted, in my book. At that age, it didn't need much to bring on the urge to spank one out. I distinctly recall even getting a boner over Emily Bishop from Coronation Street at one time.
[youtube]KM-yIBVEgF4[/youtube]Tony Parsehole wrote:Me and my missus were just talking about this the other day. Why is there always a single shoe or a boot on the side of a road? How did it get there? Surely somebody would miss a single shoe and it would be harder to walk with one shoe than no shoes wouldn't it?Tigzy wrote:one time.
Speaking of unkempt railway sidings, overgrown bits of waste ground etc. - ever encounter the strange phenomenon of the Abandonded Adidas? You know, the lone trainer you'd always find in those places. Funny how there was always one, never a pair - even though it was not unusual to find a discarded sweater or jumper nearby.
I try to know at least something about them. Cricket's a fucking mystery, but I think that's by design. If you stay away from the hardcores, it can be a lot of fun. A baseball game on a beautiful day in a town with a losing team can be awesome. Royals games were like $7 for bleacher seats. It's a nice day, you got hot dogs and beer, and if the royals got 12 runs, you got free donuts. It was almost like a picnic, but with no ants, and bathrooms nearby.sacha wrote:We are both franc's socks, and you know it.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Attack =/= insult. And I'm the fucking English-as-a-second-fucking-language guy here.
Also, Franc is Franc, Sacha is Sacha, and I'm me. Don't play the FTB game of guilt by association.
You may win even more than 99.9% of the time if you ask me about those subjects, but the challenge would be to get me to give a fuck about my lack of knowledge in those sporting events.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:if you're desperate for a win, ask me about American Football, Baseball, Basketball or Ice Hockey. That's a 99.9% win for you.
Ho
In that case, you should totally check out The Ssion. I think you would really enjoy them.ReneeHendricks wrote:(the 16 year old Renee reporting in) In totally unrelated news, I bought an Amazon copy of "You Ruined My Christmas" by the Supreme Fabulettes (http://www.amazon.com/You-Ruined-My-Xma ... Fabulettes if anyone is interested), took a snapshot of it having been purchased, showed Boy George, and now he's following me on Twitter.
I just completed a stupid-assed dance around my room to the tune of Karma Chameleon. I have completed my 30 year regression.
Back to the insanity of the Baboons, etal.
You mean, shit with holes in it? Like, SpongeShit or something?SPACKlick wrote:Ho
Lee
Shit
that is all.
How is Cricket a mystery?welch wrote:I try to know at least something about them. Cricket's a fucking mystery, but I think that's by design. If you stay away from the hardcores, it can be a lot of fun. A baseball game on a beautiful day in a town with a losing team can be awesome. Royals games were like $7 for bleacher seats. It's a nice day, you got hot dogs and beer, and if the royals got 12 runs, you got free donuts. It was almost like a picnic, but with no ants, and bathrooms nearby.sacha wrote:We are both franc's socks, and you know it.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Attack =/= insult. And I'm the fucking English-as-a-second-fucking-language guy here.
Also, Franc is Franc, Sacha is Sacha, and I'm me. Don't play the FTB game of guilt by association.
You may win even more than 99.9% of the time if you ask me about those subjects, but the challenge would be to get me to give a fuck about my lack of knowledge in those sporting events.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:if you're desperate for a win, ask me about American Football, Baseball, Basketball or Ice Hockey. That's a 99.9% win for you.
I agree that Arguably is probably the best place to start. It's a tome, but well worth it. This is how I broke into Gore Vidal's work, as well. I read The United States (his tome of essays) before I dived into his novels.sacha wrote:
Hitch22 should be one of the last books of his you read. It's a personal story. Once you are familiar with his perspective on the subjects that he was passionate enough to write about (both definitions of passionate), including his many articles for Vanity Fair, Slate, and other publications, you may be interested to find out how he came to be who he was, that is when you read Hitch22.
I know that Google searches are Kryptonite to you, so here is some help:
http://www.slate.com/authors.christopher_hitchens.html
http://www.vanityfair.com/search?page=1 ... r+Hitchens
Don't begin with the recent articles about his experience with cancer, start at least a few years back.
or at the very least, if you simply cannot be bothered to read a good sampling of his articles, then read Arguably:
and for fuck's sake purchase it through the Slime Pit Amazon button.
Slime Pit Amazon! hahaha!
I'll check 'em out later.welch wrote:In that case, you should totally check out The Ssion. I think you would really enjoy them.ReneeHendricks wrote:(the 16 year old Renee reporting in) In totally unrelated news, I bought an Amazon copy of "You Ruined My Christmas" by the Supreme Fabulettes (http://www.amazon.com/You-Ruined-My-Xma ... Fabulettes if anyone is interested), took a snapshot of it having been purchased, showed Boy George, and now he's following me on Twitter.
I just completed a stupid-assed dance around my room to the tune of Karma Chameleon. I have completed my 30 year regression.
Back to the insanity of the Baboons, etal.
I like a good international test though.SPACKlick wrote: Now, if you'd said it was Boring, Dull, arid, bromidic, characterless, cloying, drab, drudging, flat, ho hum, humdrum, insipid, interminable, irksome, lifeless, monotonous, moth-eaten, mundane, platitudinous, plebeian, prosaic, repetitious, routine, spiritless, stale, stodgy, stuffy, stupid, tame, tedious, threadbare, tiresome, tiring, trite, unexciting, uninteresting, unvaried, vapid, wearisome or well-worn, I'd have been on board.
1. Rod Marsh (Aus) and Ian Botham(Eng)
One of the most famous sledging incidents is by far one of the best.
Rod Marsh : “So how’s your wife & my kids?â€
Ian Botham : “The wife is fine but the kids are retardedâ€
One of the all time great bowlers, Glen McGrath was getting frustrated at being unable to dismiss little known Zimbabwean cricketer Eddo Brandes.
McGrath: “Why are you so fat?â€
Brandes “Because every time I fuck your wife, she gives me a biscuit.â€
Dennis Lilllee (Australia) sledging the world
Dennis Lillee had a sledge that he employed against many batsmen during his long cricket career.
“I can see why you are batting so badly, you’ve got some shit on the end of your batâ€
At this point the batsman would usually flip his bat over and examine the end, to which Lillee would respond
“Wrong end mateâ€
:shock:"Admit it.
You'd go to jail for this!"
Sir Jimmy approves of this!Dick Strawkins wrote:LOL!
Hey PZ, feminist hero, love your new sponsor. :lol:
http://i.imgur.com/kvG46.jpg
If you can't read the logo on the feminist's shirt, it says:
"Admit it.
You'd go to jail for this!"
Code: Select all
<a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/96620016/skepchick-rebeccawatson/2012-12-drunken-rape-big-bang-theory.html"><img src="http://elevatorgate.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/20121219-131914.jpg" alt="oh no where did your ads go, Becky?" class="alignnone size-full" /></a>I was recently amused by an ad on Pharyngula selling cupcake baking kits.Dick Strawkins wrote:LOL!
Hey PZ, feminist hero, love your new sponsor. :lol:
http://i.imgur.com/kvG46.jpg
Ophelia (Ophelia pain,sister) doesn't fare any better with the ads either:Dick Strawkins wrote:LOL!
Hey PZ, feminist hero, love your new sponsor. :lol:
http://i.imgur.com/kvG46.jpg
I REALLY like this article. Well done, John!welch wrote:here, a longer version of what I'm on about: http://dissentionisnothate.wordpress.co ... ca-watson/
If one uses RW's drunk-rape-consent tweets as the springboard for an attempt at discussion (taking welch's cautions about trying to do that but going with it for a moment anyway), then IMO it's not only fair but important to go back to the tweet that started it - the one commenting on Penny & Leonard in Big Bang. Obviously, it's a sitcom. But it's what set RW off on her broad comments on sex, alcohol, & consent so warrants review.welch wrote:Then yank the links and references. It's a good piece without them. But as long as you even seem to make it about them, they will make damned sure it IS about them. Have a good debate about consent. Just don't let them be the subject.Notung wrote:But John, I'm not arguing against them as such. I'm using it as a catalyst for a post for its own sake. I don't expect them to engage me at all, and if they do it'll be some kind of ad hominem, as we all know. It's really just to talk about the issue of intoxication and consent in a rational way. So far the only comment thread on this is on Skepchick, and we know how tolerant they are of objections to their view. I wanted to provide a comment thread where people can state and defend their own views without getting deleted.
So - Penny's drunk, but she's the one who initiates sex, grabbing Leonard's arm and hauling him toward his bedroom without asking for consent. Leonard's roommate and downstairs neighbor (that part clipped from the quote above) both interpreted what they heard through the night to mean that Penny and/or both Penny and Leonard were enthusiastically engaging in sex. The next morning Penny is chagrined, maybe can't remember the night, calls it a mistake and would like to move on, apologizes to Leonard, but in no way that we're privvy to see (in these sitcom scenes) is it suggested that she feels she was taken advantage of.Scene: The apartment. It is night and the lights are off. Knocking.
Leonard: Coming!
Penny (with slurred speech throughout this scene): Damn you, you rat bastard.
Leonard: Are you drunk?
Penny: Zack was a perfectly nice guy, and then you ruined him!
Leonard: How did I ruin him?
Penny: ‘Cause in the olden days, I never would’ve known he was so stupid.
Leonard: Come on, he wasn’t that stupid.
Penny: Yes, he was! He thought you were gonna blow up the moon!
Leonard: Okay, yeah, he’s stupid.
Penny: He spent the entire night bragging about how he invented the word appe-teasers.
Leonard: How is that my fault?
Penny: You have destroyed my ability to tolerate idiots. Now, come with me.
(takes Leonard's hand and starts walking vigorously toward the bedrooms)
Leonard: Where are we going?
Penny: We’re gonna have sex.
Leonard: Why? I mean, okay.
Sheldon: What’s going on?
Penny: Put on your noise-cancelling headphones, ’cause it’s gonna get loud.
Sheldon: Oh! Not this again.
Scene: The next morning. ...
heldon: FYI, my noise-cancelling headphones proved ineffective last night.
Penny (chagrined): Yeah, sorry about that.
Sheldon: As a native Texan, I must say I’ve never heard the phrase yee-haw used in quite that context.
Penny: Oh, God.
Sheldon: Oh, God. That I’ve heard on multiple occasions. ... Good morning, Leonard. ...
Leonard: Where’s Penny?
Sheldon: She returned to her apartment. I presume to shower and vomit. Not necessarily in that order.
Leonard: I wonder why she didn’t say good-bye.
Sheldon: Are you expecting me to offer an explanation of human behavior?
Leonard: I know. I just thought as an outsider, you might be able to provide a fresh perspective. ...
Scene: Outside Penny’s door.
Leonard: Oh, hey.
Penny: Oh, hi. Um, I gotta run. Early shift.
Leonard: Okay, I’ll walk down with you. So, last night was fun, huh?
Penny: Yeah, it must have been. I just threw up in my closet.
Leonard: Bummer. Anyway, I was thinking tonight maybe we could catch a movie.
Penny: Oh, yeah, tonight’s not great for me.
Leonard: Doesn’t have to be tonight. I’m free pretty much always.
Penny: Leonard, last night was a mistake.
Leonard: When you say mistake, do you mean a fortunate mistake, like the discovery of penicillin?
Penny: Look, I’m sorry. I was drunk, I was lonely, I hated Zack. Can we just forget it ever happened?
Leonard: No, it’s pretty well imprinted on my brain. Especially the whole rodeo thing.
Penny: Oh, God!
Leonard: So, that’s it? Wham, bam, thank you, Leonard?
Penny: Look, I said I’m sorry. Can’t you please let it go?
Leonard: How am I supposed to let it go? You used me for sex! ...
nippletwister wrote:Just wanted to say, I just registered for the Slymepit today.
I've been reading all(or most of) the popular atheist/skeptic blogs for years now, but I only comment on a few....and the last two years have been a special kind of annoying hell. I don't take it personally, it doesn't really affect my daily life at all, but it has often been painful watching some great liberal/atheist blogs and bloggers slide down the road to professional victim insanity. I used to love pharyngula, even the most insane femi-socialists could put up a good argument when they wanted to. Adam Lee used to not be such a smug and patronizing twit. The commenters at Friendly Atheist were once mostly sane, and I think Hemant has done a good job of not letting things get too out of hand.
It seems to me that the amount of in-group tribalism, echo-chamber perceptions of reality, and hostility to all people who don't tow the far-left SJW lines has really exploded. I haven't seen teen-age drama bullshit like this since grade school....fuck that, grade school was nothing near so bad. I never really commented at ERV, but I lurked a goodly bit. I've seen all the demonizing the FTB crowd does relating to the Slymepit, but you all seem like relatively sane, intellectually honest folks.
I hope nobody minds another newbie who has hit the bottom of the burn-out barrel with all the Oppression Olympics bullshit in the atheist/skeptical blogosphere these days. Some of those people are just plain old fucking nuts.
I noticed that the Slymepit seems to be getting new people registering every day....I'll take that as a sign of sanity, I need all the hope I can get.
Seem pretty clear to me.Skep tickle wrote: Isn't it obvious in these scenes that if anyone was taken advantage of, it was Leonard?
Indeed, and ironically, Rebecca Watson is more rapey than most!Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:So, it seems, by Watson's standards, we've all been rapists/rape victims at some time or other.
Thanks, I feel better about being raped now.
Cunt!
That particular ED article was a lot funnier prior to another deeply repressed momma's boy shooting up a grade school.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:After reading Notung's blog post and subsequent comments, then unwisely following a link, I came upon this ED marvel:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/BitingBeaver
I know ED is usualy prone to exagerations (understatement of the century), but, Sounds a bit too familiar to me...
