Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17101

Post by Tigzy »

CommanderTuvok wrote:My money is on BillHaines.
Unlikely - distinct lack of interest in Dillagate...

real horrorshow
.
.
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
Location: In a band of brigands.
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17102

Post by real horrorshow »

TFJ wrote:The dishonest wankers are coming over all reasonable in the comments. They're accusing Al of misrepresenting Schrodinger's Rapist and claiming that they are only trying to make people aware of how women might feel in certain circumstances and not trying to impose obligations on men. They have to know that that is NOT how it goes down on their forums.
There's still plenty of gold though. I like this one:
Ace of Sevens wrote:Schroedinger’s rapist is not the idea that any given man would commit rape in the right circumstances. A few people believe that, but they are not influential. The idea is that a woman has no way of knowing whether a strange man is a rapist.

Since you are in a wheelchair generally, this probably doesn’t greatly affect you. At least, that’s the theory of my friend who uses a chair.
My bold.
What, crips can't rape? Is that what Ace is saying? Now is that albeist or disableist? I'm not sure. It's not true, that should be obvious. It also takes very little Googling about to discover that not only are disabled people often victims of sexual assault - being less able to escape or defend themselves - but they are also often perpetrators. People with more severe disabilities, especially developmental/intellectual disorders, are often in residential care. When people are confined together, it's easy for predators to find victims. This is obvious in the prison system of course. Sure you're a white male Al, but luckily, the chair gets you enough victimhood to acquit you as Schrodinger's Rapist. Patronising shite!

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17103

Post by BarnOwl »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: We have a goatse smiley? I'm so gonna post more often!
Oh noes, someone had to draw his attention to it. :mrgreen:

Another vote for Onamission5 here.

Disclaimer: For a brief moment, I thought the screen name was "Onanemission." Which undoubtedly biased my choice.

Dilurk
.
.
Posts: 1215
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17104

Post by Dilurk »

BarnOwl wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: We have a goatse smiley? I'm so gonna post more often!
Oh noes, someone had to draw his attention to it. :mrgreen:

Another vote for Onamission5 here.

Disclaimer: For a brief moment, I thought the screen name was "Onanemission." Which undoubtedly biased my choice.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/onanism

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5236
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17105

Post by KiwiInOz »

animaculo wrote:Hello,
Just delurking to vote for Maiforpeace. I know that it is highly improbable but I would love it.
I must admit that mysecrethope is mai.

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17106

Post by BarnOwl »

Gumby wrote: She lives in Seattle. Oh, does that mean according to SurlyLogic I just doxxed her, even though that is common knowledge and also the headline on her twitter account?
To paraphrase Jello Biafra in Night of the Living Rednecks, "And I thought, so this is Seattle, huh? Tolerant Seattle."

[youtube]83Nfe3utHrs[/youtube]

^ Included Dead Kennedys vid in hopes that franc will start posting again soon.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5448
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17107

Post by Gumby »

One more bit of irony for the evening:

http://i46.tinypic.com/35lx35v.jpg

Yes, because we all know that FTB and A+ are the gold standard for "cool discourse".

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5236
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17108

Post by KiwiInOz »

Tigzy wrote:
AnonymousCowherd wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:My (very bad) English accent has a message for its critics: "Djust feuck off".

Thanks again for the podcast, Reap!

And as a fellow cheese eating surender* monkey, I think Specimen's posts were well written.


*Just go look at France's military history in terms of victories/defeats.
You haven't won anything since, like, forever! Like since England won the World Cup.

Apart from the World Cup that is.

That little Napoleone guy did well for a while, but I heard he was an upstart Italian? Not today? Wait until the Bourbons return - history will be surlified to suit.

But agreed, nothing wrong with Specimen's posts or Thegermansarecoming (who I guess is Gallicly challenged). It really would be a bugger for French and German speakers if they had to get rid of "gendered" words. No nouns. Or at least nothing but "das" Krapp in German. Can't have that - too much like bloody English.
One thing I could never understand is why 'cheese-eating' is used in such a derogatory sense here. Cheese is just awesome. And the French do make some very nice ones, it has to be said.
Cheese the big fromage as far as I and Tim Minchen are concerned.

[youtube]bVKCHZqax84[/youtube]

And I think the monkey comes from this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_hanger.

But for the life of me I can't imagine where the surrendering part comes from. :whistle:

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17109

Post by Ape+lust »

Gumby wrote:By the way, I have placed your work where it is less easily lost with the passage of time.
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 649#p18649
Hey, thanks Gumby (and you too, DownThunder)! I didn't know about the image thread. I appreciate it!

Za-zen
.
.
Posts: 2636
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:39 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17110

Post by Za-zen »

My parody meter hits ten on piegasm. Though this could well be a false positive, for the very simple reason. They are batshit crazy.

TheMan
.
.
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17111

Post by TheMan »

SPACKlick wrote:ruled out a few more

key
voted for
unlikely
pretty sure it's not
SPACKlick wrote: Flewllyn, Maiforpeace, Submor, piegasm, onamission, xanthe, ginny, neamhepleachas, billhaines, elgatocell, nevyn, mcbender and chana.

Well that means onamission is who I will bet for.... the nic is a tell IMHO

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17112

Post by Saint N. »

I'm kinda hoping the A+mole doesn't revel him or her (or zir? :? ) self for some time, and they don't figure it out until after they've torn apart the forum frantically looking for the spy.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Some men are tougher than women

#17113

Post by welch »

mordacious1 wrote:You know how OB is still complaining, several months later, that someone threatened to kick her in the hoo-hoo (regardless that it would only happen if said kicker was a girl instead of a man)? Even though it wasn't a real threat? The drama queen.

Compare that to this guy:

http://network.yardbarker.com/rugby/art ... e/11905354
I think it's more like a year at this point.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17114

Post by welch »

AndrewV69 wrote:
John Greg wrote:decius and real horror show, why don't you two take it to PMs, or maybe even coffee in an elevator. It's getting boring.
Are you saying that they should get a room? Just asking.

OK I am going to get my coat now.
I was waiting for the makeup sex to start, that would have been totally hot.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17115

Post by welch »

Tigzy wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Al Stefanelli seems to be offering himself up to the mob.

"Q&A about Atheism Plus, White Male Privilege, Guilt by Association, Schrodinger’s Rapist and Freethought Blogs"
http://freethoughtblogs.com/alstefanell ... /09/qanda/
I just caught that too. I see Julian 'Napoleon, you know I'm training to be a cage fighter, right?' Francisco was quick to jump in there (I do wonder if the baboon clique of the commentariat gets kudos for being 'frist!' whenever divergence from orthodoxy is detected), and, as usual, wanks out a post before engaging his stem cell:
Why would being a cage fighter be all that impressive? Cages just sit there and let you hit them. I mean, you have to punch the FUCK out of one before you actually damage it, and you'll probably really fuck up your hands, but it's not exactly a challenging opponent.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17116

Post by Badger3k »

Gumby wrote:One more bit of irony for the evening:

http://i46.tinypic.com/35lx35v.jpg

Yes, because we all know that FTB and A+ are the gold standard for "cool discourse".

But...but...they said if I joined A+ I would be cool and stuff.

Somebody should reply and say that calling all men "potential rapists" and everyone who disagrees with you "douchebags" and worse....not cool.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17117

Post by Badger3k »

welch wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Al Stefanelli seems to be offering himself up to the mob.

"Q&A about Atheism Plus, White Male Privilege, Guilt by Association, Schrodinger’s Rapist and Freethought Blogs"
http://freethoughtblogs.com/alstefanell ... /09/qanda/
I just caught that too. I see Julian 'Napoleon, you know I'm training to be a cage fighter, right?' Francisco was quick to jump in there (I do wonder if the baboon clique of the commentariat gets kudos for being 'frist!' whenever divergence from orthodoxy is detected), and, as usual, wanks out a post before engaging his stem cell:
Why would being a cage fighter be all that impressive? Cages just sit there and let you hit them. I mean, you have to punch the FUCK out of one before you actually damage it, and you'll probably really fuck up your hands, but it's not exactly a challenging opponent.
Maybe he means Nick Cage?

or Luke Cage, considering all he has is fantasy...

Sulaco
.
.
Posts: 158
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:54 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17118

Post by Sulaco »

ERV wrote:Sorry, Sulaco, that came off bitchy-- I am bitchy at the situation, didnt mean to be bitchy with you.
That's ok.

Getting her out asap doesn't take the danger away, but it is harder to get into a Western Hospital than a Pakistani one.

I haven't read your post on ERV, but I will do so.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17119

Post by welch »

real horrorshow wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Al Stefanelli seems to be offering himself up to the mob.

"Q&A about Atheism Plus, White Male Privilege, Guilt by Association, Schrodinger’s Rapist and Freethought Blogs"
http://freethoughtblogs.com/alstefanell ... /09/qanda/
He talks a lot of good sense there. Which is of course semantically equivalent to "offering himself up to the mob". Julian is straight in there! I'm especially intrigued by:
In fact, there are some people in this network who don’t talk to each other at all in our now infamous “back channel,”
I think it took Julian all of about six seconds to shit all over it too.

OH, and because I am an asshole: Julian: You're a spic.

LMU
.
.
Posts: 617
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17120

Post by LMU »

Why do you think there is just one Poe moderator? Didn't you all make Poe accounts there too?

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17121

Post by welch »

codelette wrote: lol, julian...that twat...
He once out of nowhere called me a kike; so I told him I am a spic. He didn't feel the urge to snap my neck.
He had the weirdest definition of kike, according to him it meant asshole where he was from.

He is from Brooklyn. :lol:
Jews? In Brooklyn? Nonsense.

Next thing, you're going tell me there's a lot of asians in San Francisco.

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17122

Post by BarnOwl »

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 207847.png

That's going to torque Ophelia's Moebius panties another turn or two.

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17123

Post by Saint N. »

LMU wrote:Why do you think there is just one Poe moderator? Didn't you all make Poe accounts there too?
If I hadn't been around for it's inception, it wouldn't take much to convince me that A+ itself was one big Poe.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17124

Post by welch »

Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
I'm confused. Why would a hobo need her consent to masturbate?

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17125

Post by Saint N. »

welch wrote:
AndrewV69 wrote:
John Greg wrote:decius and real horror show, why don't you two take it to PMs, or maybe even coffee in an elevator. It's getting boring.
Are you saying that they should get a room? Just asking.

OK I am going to get my coat now.
I was waiting for the makeup sex to start, that would have been totally hot.
Homeless in Seattle seems to be into it. :lol:

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17126

Post by Tigzy »

LMU wrote:Why do you think there is just one Poe moderator? Didn't you all make Poe accounts there too?
I did. Could never be arsed to use it, though.

As for the trollmod - I haven't yet found one mod who threatened to flounce over Dillagate, so presuming the person in Dick_Strawkin's email isn't talking a load of old toot, I'd put my money on Piegasm, as he/she is the only one who seems to just about fit the bill.
BarnOwl wrote:http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 207847.png

That's going to torque Ophelia's Moebius panties another turn or two.
Aw bless. He's growing up.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17127

Post by welch »

Gumby wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote: Wow. Ok, yeah, I don't want to see someone masturbating in public while on my way to work either.
Oh I agree, I wouldn't want to see it either. But my point was...
However, it seems very, very hypocritical of Jennifer McCreight to be so full of disdain considering she suffers from depression - a *mental illness*. Many homeless suffer from mental illness. I wonder why it didn't occur to this "social warrior" to find a way to help this man???
Indeed. All she saw was a filthy disgusting object, not a man in need of help. She probably thought he was exercising his male privilege in addition to his Hobo Willy.
Yeah. I get not being thrilled at random masturbation by others. Saw a woman in the parking lot of an apt. complex I lived in checking her vaginal oil in the front seat of her car once. at 5pm. in june. in a NICE car. She wasn't bad looking either. Still just kept walking, because it really wasn't as pornoriffic as I'd always thought that would be. Kind of like "dum-de-dum, nice day today, what's that ladyOH FOR FUCK'S SAKE WOMAN, DO THAT INDOORS."

acathode
.
.
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:46 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17128

Post by acathode »

Tigzy wrote:
LMU wrote:As for the trollmod - I haven't yet found one mod who threatened to flounce over Dillagate, so presuming the person in Dick_Strawkin's email isn't talking a load of old toot, I'd put my money on Piegasm, as he/she is the only one who seems to just about fit the bill
Remember that some stuff could be referring to stuff going on in the A+ "backchannel", I'm sure they have some sort of hidden mod section where mods can discuss things in private. Or at least, that's common sense to me, after having been a mod at a few places.. then again, A+ and common sense are two things that seldom intersect.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17129

Post by CommanderTuvok »

BarnOwl wrote:http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 207847.png

That's going to torque Ophelia's Moebius panties another turn or two.
I've mentioned many times before that Ophelia is blind to Rhys' use of the term "cunt". She only gets upset when she can get some personal mileage out of it.

mikelf
.
.
Posts: 315
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:34 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17130

Post by mikelf »

[quote="Gumby"]http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

So, I was curious just how many men were actually defending her public monkey spanker. So I found Jen's twitter feed and took a look. See for yourself.

http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o74 ... 56a014.jpg

Seriously, that is it? A total of 5 responses. None of which are actually defending the fellow.

codelette
.
.
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17131

Post by codelette »

welch wrote:
codelette wrote: lol, julian...that twat...
He once out of nowhere called me a kike; so I told him I am a spic. He didn't feel the urge to snap my neck.
He had the weirdest definition of kike, according to him it meant asshole where he was from.

He is from Brooklyn. :lol:
Jews? In Brooklyn? Nonsense.

Next thing, you're going tell me there's a lot of asians in San Francisco.
Jews? Yo mean assholes?
Was julian implying that jewish people are assholes? :o

(comment #122)
Anonym zu freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck/2012/01/03/mallorie-nasrallah-says-i-like-it-when-mencallmethings/

Couch
.
.
Posts: 536
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17132

Post by Couch »

Tigzy wrote:I just caught that too. I see Julian 'Napoleon, you know I'm training to be a cage fighter, right?' Francisco was quick to jump in there (I do wonder if the baboon clique of the commentariat gets kudos for being 'frist!' whenever divergence from orthodoxy is detected), and, as usual, wanks out a post before engaging his stem cell:
Garp! Diet Coke on my keyboard and wet eye-corners! Oh, that's sooooo good.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17133

Post by Tigzy »

welch wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
I'm confused. Why would a hobo need her consent to masturbate?
Isn't it kind of bizarre to imagine that not so long ago, some priggish Muslim cleric was probably complaining about a horse-faced young woman taking much delight in showing off a lot of unseemly flesh, as though it were a divine right or necessary for survival, or something?

From boobquake to tinkle-tubeshake. I think I just might have a wank to show solidarity with the horny hobo...

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17134

Post by Skep tickle »

Oh, what an interesting development. I was going to say SubMor for the Poe, but if his website sounds just like he does at A+ that makes him unlikely - would have required too much preparation. (Full disclosure, I have not gone to SubMor's website to check out that claim, and don't plan to. Gotta maintain some standards.)

While catching up on the marvelously entertaining last couple of pages here, I also popped over to Atheism+ to see what those cherubs have been up to, and caught this thread: "VOTE DOWN this hateful URBAN DICTIONARY entry" http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1872

Clicking on the link so handily provided takes us to: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ism%20Plus

This one may be worth a screen shot or whatever y'all do to get those image files, unless it's already been posted here and I missed that particular post. I'll just quote the entry (and do note the name at the bottom, too):
1. Atheism Plus 311 up, 224 down
A bunch of frauds. Despite having atheist in its name it really isn't atheism at all. Their goal is to subvert atheism with the religion of feminist indoctrination and bitch about non existent misogyny.

To these people any legitimate questioning of feminists and female privilege is grounds for calling anyone a misogynist. Atheism Plus is really nothing more then an attempt at co-opting the meaning of atheism.
Atheism Plus is nothing more than dogmatic feminists trying to commandeer the atheist movement. This will set back Atheism for decades if these usurpers gain popularity.

fraud pussy begger mangina hijack radical feminist s.e. cupp
by Oolon_Colluphid Sep 3, 2012

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17135

Post by sacha »

AndrewV69 wrote:
John D wrote:I might as well lower the tone as far as possible... No other comment necessary.
Hmmmm... do I see signs that Becky is developing back boobs? You have to watch out for those. Once you develop them I hear they are impossible to get rid of:
both of those photographs are from years ago. She looks a bit different now.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17136

Post by Skep tickle »

JackRayner wrote:Found a link to this in my twitter feed;

http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x17/ ... tickle.png

http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... ment-83735

This is about Skep Tickle, correct?
(reaching back a couple of pages to answer)

Ayup. Ah, the nostalgia.

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17137

Post by Saint N. »

Skep tickle wrote: Clicking on the link so handily provided takes us to: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ism%20Plus

This one may be worth a screen shot or whatever y'all do to get those image files, unless it's already been posted here and I missed that particular post. I'll just quote the entry (and do note the name at the bottom, too):
1. Atheism Plus 311 up, 224 down
A bunch of frauds. Despite having atheist in its name it really isn't atheism at all. Their goal is to subvert atheism with the religion of feminist indoctrination and bitch about non existent misogyny.

To these people any legitimate questioning of feminists and female privilege is grounds for calling anyone a misogynist. Atheism Plus is really nothing more then an attempt at co-opting the meaning of atheism.
Atheism Plus is nothing more than dogmatic feminists trying to commandeer the atheist movement. This will set back Atheism for decades if these usurpers gain popularity.

fraud pussy begger mangina hijack radical feminist s.e. cupp
by Oolon_Colluphid Sep 3, 2012
Can't be 100% sure it's actually oolon, or just someone having a laugh by signing the entry with his moniker. Considering his extensive commentaries on gendered epithets I'm a bit skeptical that it's actually him.

The entry itself is hilarious though.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17138

Post by Skep tickle »

Ooh. CIpher and Setar are "helping" in that Lousy Canuck thread, as Flewellyn and Matt Dillahunty air their views about the Dillahunty affair.

:popcorn:

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17139

Post by welch »

CommanderTuvok wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 207847.png

That's going to torque Ophelia's Moebius panties another turn or two.
I've mentioned many times before that Ophelia is blind to Rhys' use of the term "cunt". She only gets upset when she can get some personal mileage out of it.
Pretty much. They all have the ethical consistency of over-watered gruel.

John Greg
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 2669
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: New Westminster, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17140

Post by John Greg »

They all have the ethical consistency of over-watered gruel.
And the integrity of warm jello.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17141

Post by Skep tickle »

Post #18 at http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ch-to-you/, SZ suggests she coulda woulda told LeftSidePositive "where I live". (I had said to LSP that Stephanie & Josh could probably tell LSP where he/she could find me.)
Stephanie Zvan wrote:Actually, Eliza, you were very up front at the slimepit about the fact that you weren’t interested in helping the forum meet it’s goals. LSP has your gender wrong, but everything else is pretty well on. And the reason LSP has your gender wrong is probably that you adopted an unusual handle that was already being used elsewhere by someone who is male. I see you’ve changed that.

Now run back to the pit and be happy I was awake enough not to take “face to face” literally and tell LSP where you live.
She's referring to me by yet another name I've used at FtB, once, in post #75 here: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... /i-object/ after SZ wrote disparagingly about Gurdur, including about him spending time here, and she questioned the veracity of a French-American friend of mine who stood up for Gurdur, while SZ's fans mocked my friend for her use of English. (Hmm, just as Mai did, presumably as a false front for Mai's real objections to what Specimen was saying...is there a theme here?)

I keep having trouble logging in there, never sure whether I'm just forgetting the password or have been banned. They seem like equally likely explanations, n'est ce pas?

Oh, and let me not forget this: Hi, Stephanie! Be sure to use Purell before you touch anything here! :D

aweraw
.
.
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:15 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17142

Post by aweraw »

John Greg wrote:
They all have the ethical consistency of over-watered gruel.
And the integrity of warm jello.
Piss warm gelatanous gruel beings. Evokes a B-grade horror film motif of the whole situation.

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17143

Post by JackRayner »

This poe-mod business is entertaining as Hell! Great stuff!

I'm currently imagining fingers being pointed and shit being flung by everyone behind the scenes! :lol:

Oh, how I wish I could look within! :pray:

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17144

Post by JackRayner »

Rystefn wrote:
JackRayner wrote:Dude! Those fishtanks? DA BOMB! I need to go back to that pla-eeerrrrr, I mean... WHATKINDOFHOOLIGANDRINKSTHATMUCH?!!! APPALLING!! :?
Bah, they're mostly ice. If I wanted a big glass of booze-flavored ice, that's what I would have ordered. Those glasses can hold a fifth and still have room for mixers, fruit, and yes, ice if you make it right, but they pretty much just give you two screwdrivers and a gallon of water. Bastards.
You're right. It was probably about 75% ice. Still, I had fun racing my friend's drunk ass cousin to see who could finish theirs first, and watching her boyfriend cringe and shrink in his chair. :D

Brain Box
.
.
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17145

Post by Brain Box »

Another example of plusser hypocrisy in the "You screwed Matt Dillahunty" thread. While the forum is shitting on Budget for his "tone trolling" another member (ladyaliara) raises a point about a forum rule regarding harassment. Of course her post is edited by a mod to hide the entire thing, with no explanation given, as it completely counters his support of Budget being called all kinds of nasty things.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 7&start=50


Mod Edit [ Hide ]
Flewellyn wrote:
OUR STANDARDS ARE that you do not tone police other members. You do not do it.

And yet you are doing this.




Forum Rules

Postby Siliddar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:19 pm
Posting Rules
Don't Be an Ass: Wheaton's Law is in full effect. Don't harrass, insult or otherwise be an asshole to other forum members. Bottom line: Play Nice.

I'm wondering what "playing nice" entails, if members are allowed to curse other members out, insult, & generally treat them with contempt. When you click the link for Wheaton's Law, it clearly says, "Don't be a dick."

Where is the line drawn? What is ok, & not ok? I'm a little confused here.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17146

Post by Michael K Gray »

Skep tickle wrote:Ooh. CIpher and Setar are "helping" in that Lousy Canuck thread, as Flewellyn and Matt Dillahunty air their views about the Dillahunty affair.
Matt has actually raised his cred with me from the bottom of the gutter to an inch above it.
He is not backing down.
He is getting angry at their pure distilled public hypocrisy.
Posters as well as "moderators".

He has already arrived at the clear conclusion that we were 100% correct, and that he was 90% incorrect about the reception that a newbie gets in the A++ insane asylum.
He throws around "pity-party" epithet (to describe the A+Theister infants) like confetti; and he is spot on target.

Onya, Matt.
How's the missus taking all of this white male privileged aggression, eh?

(Lousy Coward has closed the thread, of course.)

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17147

Post by rayshul »

Guest wrote:Hi all. Delurking for a moment.

Someone wanted a pic of Laden and Zvan snoogling, so I thought I'd leave this here:
Oh hi welcome to the SlimepiiiiARGHHHHHHHHHHHHH THE BEAVER.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17148

Post by Skep tickle »

From the "You screwed Matt Dillahunty" thread that Brain Box linked above, there's this from earlier today (excerpted from a longer call-and-response):
Mr.Samsa wrote:
Sleeper wrote:Please tell me that the vilification of male atheists attending conventions is based on more substantive and documented incidents than RW's elevator annoyance.

No male atheist has ever been vilified (for being male or atheist).

Sleeper wrote:Or that the decision to petition for the removal of the Vacula fellow was not a politically motivated event and had something to do with his criminal activity or the advancement of atheism.

That was a great victory for atheism. I'm not sure if "politically motivated" is the correct term, more just "ethically motivated".
http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 150#p28422

TheMan
.
.
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17149

Post by TheMan »

real horrorshow wrote:
TFJ wrote:The dishonest wankers are coming over all reasonable in the comments. They're accusing Al of misrepresenting Schrodinger's Rapist and claiming that they are only trying to make people aware of how women might feel in certain circumstances and not trying to impose obligations on men. They have to know that that is NOT how it goes down on their forums.
There's still plenty of gold though. I like this one:
Ace of Sevens wrote:Schroedinger’s rapist is not the idea that any given man would commit rape in the right circumstances. A few people believe that, but they are not influential. The idea is that a woman has no way of knowing whether a strange man is a rapist.

Since you are in a wheelchair generally, this probably doesn’t greatly affect you. At least, that’s the theory of my friend who uses a chair.
My bold.
What, crips can't rape? Is that what Ace is saying? Now is that albeist or disableist? I'm not sure. It's not true, that should be obvious. It also takes very little Googling about to discover that not only are disabled people often victims of sexual assault - being less able to escape or defend themselves - but they are also often perpetrators. People with more severe disabilities, especially developmental/intellectual disorders, are often in residential care. When people are confined together, it's easy for predators to find victims. This is obvious in the prison system of course. Sure you're a white male Al, but luckily, the chair gets you enough victimhood to acquit you as Schrodinger's Rapist. Patronising shite!

I used to do some volunteer work at a house established to home people with developmental/intellectual disorders, some of them in electric wheel chairs. I used to pop in every second wednesday evening and fart arse around with play dough (home made). I was told not to get them too excited but playing with play dough generally descended into a food fight or playing attach the play dough penis to the person sitting next to you... I didn't discourage them in this free art making.

The people who lived in the house were adults from roughly 20-30 yo and supervised 24/7. I got chatting with one of the night shift supervisors and encouraged her to join in the art activities. I asked he if she ends up watching TV all night and how can I get a job like that... she told me she spends most of her time making sure the women were not sneaking into the mens rooms and vice versa and that they were a horny lot and also very strong. as long as she maintained an air of respect (and sometimes fear) it was managable but once that was gone ( and I discovered this in a couple of months for myself as they ended up fighting for my attentions (not always in a sexual way..) it was time to change house.

One person in particular who spent most of his time in an electric wheelchair and could only communicate via a keyboard. when I was first introduced to him he kept pointing to the keyboard and the supervisor told m it was broken. I plugged it into a PC ( a windows 806) worked out what was wrong (a cable problem) and learnt the reasons why they took their time fixing his means of communication. The horny toad had a knack of sweet talking the women housemates who could read into falling in love with him (and there fore wanting to be with him). No wonder the supervisor rolled her eyes when I fixed it.

Yeah they are capable and I dare say not shy in expressing any desires....

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17150

Post by Skep tickle »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:Ooh. CIpher and Setar are "helping" in that Lousy Canuck thread, as Flewellyn and Matt Dillahunty air their views about the Dillahunty affair.
Matt has actually raised his cred with me from the bottom of the gutter to an inch above it.
He is not backing down.
He is getting angry at their pure distilled public hypocrisy.
Posters as well as "moderators".

He has already arrived at the clear conclusion that we were 100% correct, and that he was 90% incorrect about the reception that a newbie gets in the A++ insane asylum.
He throws around "pity-party" epithet (to describe the A+Theister infants) like confetti; and he is spot on target.

Onya, Matt.
How's the missus taking all of this white male privileged aggression, eh?

(Lousy Coward has closed the thread, of course.)
Who's "the missus"?

Brain Box
.
.
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:53 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17151

Post by Brain Box »

Ah, they moved the discussion to a different thread where that user was re-educated...

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1727
Brain Box wrote:Another example of plusser hypocrisy in the "You screwed Matt Dillahunty" thread. While the forum is shitting on Budget for his "tone trolling" another member (ladyaliara) raises a point about a forum rule regarding harassment. Of course her post is edited by a mod to hide the entire thing, with no explanation given, as it completely counters his support of Budget being called all kinds of nasty things.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 7&start=50


Mod Edit [ Hide ]
Flewellyn wrote:
OUR STANDARDS ARE that you do not tone police other members. You do not do it.

And yet you are doing this.




Forum Rules

Postby Siliddar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:19 pm
Posting Rules
Don't Be an Ass: Wheaton's Law is in full effect. Don't harrass, insult or otherwise be an asshole to other forum members. Bottom line: Play Nice.

I'm wondering what "playing nice" entails, if members are allowed to curse other members out, insult, & generally treat them with contempt. When you click the link for Wheaton's Law, it clearly says, "Don't be a dick."

Where is the line drawn? What is ok, & not ok? I'm a little confused here.

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17152

Post by Saint N. »

Skep tickle wrote:Post #18 at http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ch-to-you/, SZ suggests she coulda woulda told LeftSidePositive "where I live". (I had said to LSP that Stephanie & Josh could probably tell LSP where he/she could find me.)
Stephanie Zvan wrote:Actually, Eliza, you were very up front at the slimepit about the fact that you weren’t interested in helping the forum meet it’s goals. LSP has your gender wrong, but everything else is pretty well on. And the reason LSP has your gender wrong is probably that you adopted an unusual handle that was already being used elsewhere by someone who is male. I see you’ve changed that.

Now run back to the pit and be happy I was awake enough not to take “face to face” literally and tell LSP where you live.
So Steffelant feels justified to brag about possibly doc-dropping someone's address if she's tired enough to mistake a simple comment for a threat, as long as it's made by someone who stands up to her bullshit. Yet she'll defend Laden (an ally of hers), who sent actual threats of violence to someone, any hour of the day, no questions asked. I said it before, I'll say it again, this person has no fuckin integrity or principles. It's a pure act for her. She's found a tiny, negligible, insignificant, source of authority and is milking it for all it's worth. Fuck you, Steffelantosaurus, and your irrational hangup about people misspelling your stupid name.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17153

Post by Skep tickle »

(From a couple posts above - was just wondering if Matt Dillahunty's missus is a public figure, too - but maybe you were just suggesting his T level was running a little higher at home, too)

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17154

Post by rayshul »

Don't think anyone posted Skepdirt's classic A+ Consent Form for Jen and homeless people.

http://skepdirt.files.wordpress.com/201 ... onsent.pdf

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17155

Post by Saint N. »

Skep tickle wrote:Who's "the missus"?
His wife Beth. She's has a feminst/atheist, A+esque podcast called Godless Bitches. Judging by the comments she's made over the past year and a half she sides with the FtB/A+ crowd completely, on just about everything from EG to Schrodinger's Rapist to harassment policies to patriarchy to (insert whatever the hell else you can think of). We'll see whether Matt's issues with the plussers changes things for her too.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17156

Post by rayshul »

Saint N. wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:
Stephanie Zvan wrote:Now run back to the pit and be happy I was awake enough not to take “face to face” literally and tell LSP where you live.
So Steffelant feels justified to brag about possibly doc-dropping someone's address if she's tired enough to mistake a simple comment for a threat, as long as it's made by someone who stands up to her bullshit. Yet she'll defend Laden (an ally of hers), who sent actual threats of violence to someone, any hour of the day, no questions asked. I said it before, I'll say it again, this person has no fuckin integrity or principles. It's a pure act for her. She's found a tiny, negligible, insignificant, source of authority and is milking it for all it's worth. Fuck you, Steffelantosaurus, and your irrational hangup about people misspelling your stupid name.
That's quite a threat, there. If you don't be quiet, I'll send someone to find you.

I never know the point at which you should probably contact the police, but given what happened to ERV it miiiight be something you'd want to think about.

Saint N.
.
.
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17157

Post by Saint N. »

rayshul wrote:That's quite a threat, there. If you don't be quiet, I'll send someone to find you.

I never know the point at which you should probably contact the police, but given what happened to ERV it miiiight be something you'd want to think about.
And her brain isn't even damaged by testosterone. So what's Stefunny's excuse, she's just asshole?

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17158

Post by JackRayner »

Skep tickle wrote:(From a couple posts above - was just wondering if Matt Dillahunty's missus is a public figure, too - but maybe you were just suggesting his T level was running a little higher at home, too)
I take it you're referring to MKG's post?
Onya, Matt.
How's the missus taking all of this white male privileged aggression, eh?
I guess you could say his wife is a public figure. Ever heard of "Godless Bitches"? If not, read the about; http://godlessbitches.podbean.com/about/

Beth Presswood, the creator of this feminist show? That's Dillahunty's wife... :?

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17159

Post by Dick Strawkins »

rayshul wrote:Don't think anyone posted Skepdirt's classic A+ Consent Form for Jen and homeless people.

http://skepdirt.files.wordpress.com/201 ... onsent.pdf
:D
Fantastic stuff!
It needs to be seen more, so here it is as a screencap.

http://i.imgur.com/5cxtw.jpg

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17160

Post by Michael K Gray »

Skep tickle wrote:Who's "the missus"?
Beth Prestwood.
She counts as a public figure as she is a permanent co-host on the "Godless Bitches" podcast, and often appear on the Atheist Community of Austin TV Show.
To gauge her position in matters feminitsa, she uses the egregious & totally unqualified lunatic Amanda Marcotte for her medical reproductive advice.
She is, in my opinion, a full "mental" jacket bozo bonkers gender feminazi femtheist.

(Good luck Matt!)

Locked