free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Everybody needs to watch this. Antifa will be exposed today.
I liked the comic book story more = as the story had a beginning, a middle and an end. Though the main theme was that the writer would rather be doing something else. The TV series writers seem to have their favourite characters, but not have much idea as to what to do with the plot. Apparently it's very popular - so expect more of the same.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Last night I watched the penultimate episode of 'The Boys', about a superhero-swinger-orgy. It wasn't arousing. It was humdrum. GF & I weren't enthusiastic about seeing the season finale, so we went to sleep. 'The Boys' was a grimy comic book-- funny at first glance, but then immediately tedious. The teevee show version stayed fresher-- for the first season-- but went stale.
In keeping with the comic theme... you are (most likely) regretting that welsh rarebit before bedtime now...Service Dog wrote: ↑Then I dreamed...
Last time I was in a Starbucks (last week)... they had both of the toilets locked. I asked at the counter if they could open one and the kid said that they were broken. and I said "What... both bathrooms are broken?" and he just shrugged. It is against Michigan health code to serve food and not have a working bathroom. Fuck Starbucks. What a scam.mordacious1 wrote: ↑ We woke!!!!!
But if we get too woke,
We go broke.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/starbucks-cl ... 08972.html
It reminded me of Almost Famous-- a resemblance she acknowledges, with the movie-quote at the end.
I haven't seen it, but better than 50/50 they take the opportunity to make a statement about sexual politics from the woke mono-perspective. In the book, Palmer has an assistant called Jean. In this version, she is an experienced spy who reluctantly takes the inexperienced Palmer along. It might still be worth watching, I suppose.
Eh, Howard was a master of this: A few politically targeted attacks to give the impression you care about "strong borders", and you can pretty much flood the country with immigrants and no one will complain.Service Dog wrote: ↑On the other hand-- it's ironic that her 'strong borders' politics... clash with her desire to visit her husband's family in Australia. Does she 'get' that? I dunno.
Bhurzum wrote: ↑ It's the [Insert protagonist name here] show.
Introduce protagonist, slowly but surely erode his credibility, worth, abilities and standing with the viewer(s)
Whilst...
Introduce [Insert "strong woman" character here], slowly but surely undermine protagonist, openly mock him, out-perform him and replace him as the central character in his own show. Bonus points for being black (or brown but not Asian-oriental), a rug-munching dyke, "woke" as fuck, vegan, communist, pro-Palestine (basically an anti-semite), a sweaty fat ass, blah, blah, fucking blah.
It's the tried-and-tested formula™ - go forth and churn out dog shit "original" content or infest (then destroy) already established works remembering to scold the fans when they go mental at your blatant act(s) of vandalism.
https://c.tenor.com/pyubK98udecAAAAC/cl ... -clown.gif
"Seattle - the Hunter Biden of Cities."
Democrat Katie Hill, a former California congresswoman who owes hundreds of thousands of dollars to media parties she unsuccessfully sued over the publication of salacious pictures while she was in office, has filed for bankruptcy.
A follow-up wherein PZ doubles-down, repudiates his earlier claim, and snatches defeat from the jaws of victory:Steersman wrote: ↑ In other news, it seems that the infamous PZ Myers recently had something in the way of a quite welcome Road-to-Damascus conversion to the biological definitions for the sexes, and is now apparently fully onboard with my argument, based on those definitions, that menopausees no longer qualify as females:
https://twitter.com/pzmyers/status/1466458067491598342
Not quite sure what he's getting at with the last sentence, but it seems to dovetail with my argument that too many are trying to make the sexes into "immutable identities" instead of accepting the terms as labels for transitory biological capabilities.What? Because I didn't even see your question?
"female" is not applicable -- it refers to individuals that produce ova. By the technical definition, many cis women are not female.
It's a problematic term to identify someone by their mode of reproduction.
Tweet found over at Ophelia Benson's Slough of Despond, although the comments provide some illuminating and/or amusing cases of incoherent and self-serving "logic":
https://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/20 ... t-pattern/
Nice segue ... ;-)Service Dog wrote: ↑ Don't overlook PZ's claim-- that engineering a master race is an obtainable goal.
<snip>
In fact, I just watched a Minnesota PBS documentary on this very subject.
<snip>
https://youtu.be/8BSDZ1DIEIQ
Kind of looks like he's using "man" and "woman" as genders - as labels for anyone who LOOKs like an "adult human male", who LOOKS like an "adult human female". Which is flatly contradicted by the Merriam-Webster definition for "woman" that he quoted earlier - i.e., “an adult female person”. Not sure whether he's just being sloppy or engaging in motivated reasoning - or is talking out of both sides of his mouth.John is a man. Jennifer is a woman. And Racist Twitter is saying, “Of course!” Except that that has taken a simple brute fact, the presence of organs that produce gametes, and extrapolated it into the socially loaded gender terms ...
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula ... nt-2141708Well, to be … um, fair?…. he did not deny it and confirmed that was indeed what he meant @72 ....
For god knows how many posts, he seems to fail to understand that it is BECAUSE a “technical” definition fails to include obvious woman it is a rejected and failed definition.
More of a detour-- than I originally intended.
What was there to vet?free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ you would think Tucker would vet his stories better.
*On Monday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost (R) stated that Ohio’s abortion law “has a medical emergency exception, broader than just the life of the mother.” And that even if the story about a 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio having to travel to Indiana to obtain an abortion is true, “she did not have to leave Ohio to find treatment.” Yost also said that if the story is true, the original doctor in Ohio who treated the victim committed a crime by failing to report the story despite being a mandated reporter.MSN news:
"In a truly bizarre exchange during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday, the leader of a national anti-abortion organization claimed that it “would not be an abortion” if a 10-year-old rape victim got pregnant and … had an abortion.
Catherine Glenn Foster, the president and CEO of Americans United for Life, was responding to questions from Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) about whether she thinks a 10-year-old girl would or should “choose” to have a baby. After some back and forth, during which Foster refused to answer the question, she came up with a response.
“I believe it would probably impact her life, and so, therefore, it would fall under any exception and would not be an abortion,” said Foster.
“Wait,” replied Swalwell, puzzled. “It would not be an abortion if a 10-year-old with her parents made the decision not to have a baby that was the result of a rape?”
“If a 10-year-old became pregnant as a result of rape and it was threatening her life, then that’s not an abortion,” Foster said. “So it would not fall under any abortion restriction in our nation.”
Here’s a video clip of their exchange:
The Americans United for Life president appeared to be trying to redefine abortion to avoid saying that, yes, of course, a 10-year-old rape victim should be allowed to have an abortion.
It’s not even a hypothetical scenario: Earlier this month, a 10-year-old girl who had been raped at least twice was forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana to get an abortion. She and her family had to go to another state for the medical procedure because, in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Ohio imposed a ban on all abortions after six weeks. The 10-year-old was reportedly six weeks and three days pregnant.
After Foster made her bonkers claim, Swalwell turned to another committee witness, Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign.
“Ms. Warbelow, are you familiar with disinformation?” he asked.
“Uh, yes I am,” said Warbelow.
“Did you just hear some disinformation?” asked Swalwell.
“Yes, I heard some very significant disinformation,” Warbelow replied, offering an actual definition of what an abortion is.
“An abortion is a procedure, it’s a medical procedure, that individuals undergo for a wide range of circumstances, including because they have been sexually assaulted, raped in the case of the 10-year-old,” she said. “It doesn’t matter whether or not there is a statutory exemption. It is still a medical procedure that is understood to be an abortion.”
In the case of the 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio, Warbelow added that there is no exception* in Ohio state law that allows abortions when the life or the health of the pregnant person is at risk. <--hmmm. Is that true? Or is it d-d-d-disinformation?
“That’s why that 10-year-old had to cross state lines in order to receive an abortion,” she said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/an-ab ... ar-AAZA7TU
I recommend clicking on free thoughtpolice's link.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ https://nationalzero.com/2022/07/14/mis ... upporters/
Gym Jordan has a history of siding with sex offenders. It makes you wonder.
Hudson's commanding lead is impressive.Service Dog wrote: ↑ .
Ulster County, New York is having an online election. No ID necessary.
So if you Identify As as an Ultach... or Mac an Ultaigh...
be sure to vote early & vote often.
I don't always vote, but when I do, it's
https://elections.ulstercountyny.gov/i- ... r-contest/
Service Dog wrote"
He also said the story of the child was not true and hey what about the rapist?.What was there to vet?
Tucker reported that the sole source for the widely-reported 10-year old girl story-- was a single activist abortion doctor... who refused to provide any corroborating details.
What was there to vet?
Tucker reported that the sole source for the widely-reported 10-year old girl story-- was a single activist abortion doctor... who refused to provide any corroborating details.
The Indiana AG is charging the doctor in Indiana for not reporting, although the crime was committed in Ohio and the authorities there had received the report and were ready to charge someone. Just spinning the true events and saying she failed to report as if she is pro child rape.This IS NOT THE FIRST TIME the free_thoughtpolice abortion doctor in this case REFUSED TO REPORT A CHILD HAD BEEN RAPED BY A PEDOPHILE:
That's what the authorities say AFTER Tucker Carlson shined a spotlight on the case.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ the authorities there had received the report and were ready to charge someone.
The implication being that she's not pro child rape but pro illegal and wouldn't report the rape because an illegal had performed the deed.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Service Dog wrote:The Indiana AG is charging the doctor in Indiana for not reporting, although the crime was committed in Ohio and the authorities there had received the report and were ready to charge someone. Just spinning the true events and saying she failed to report as if she is pro child rape.This IS NOT THE FIRST TIME the free_thoughtpolice abortion doctor in this case REFUSED TO REPORT A CHILD HAD BEEN RAPED BY A PEDOPHILE:
What bullshit.
Politico's take on it:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/1 ... o-00045899
Politico is concerned this abortion doctor might be on the receiving-end of a Politically-Motivated Show Trial.Politico's take on it:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/1 ... o-00045899
The bigger question is, why do they want it to be true? If it was a hoax and no 9-year old was actually raped and got pregnant, wouldn't that be a good thing? Wouldn't they be relieved? :think:Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 14, 2022 2:05 pmWhy is no one concerned that 9 yo's can get pregnant now?
Bhurzum has a hankering for her fish taco.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Triggered by AlexStein99 calling her his favorite "big booty Latina" on the Capitol steps, AOC ...
I'd wear her like a gas-mask!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Bhurzum has a hankering for her fish taco.
I'd probably agree with "whatever Woke conclusion he desires". Or whatever The Horde desires. Neither he nor they seemed much willing to address this from his December 21 tweet since it contradicts much of what he said in his recent post:Service Dog wrote: ↑More of a detour-- than I originally intended.
The point I actually wanted to make-- was that I see a repeating pattern:
PZ's fake-version of 'science' Starts With whatever Woke conclusion he desires... then he fills-in whatever "data" pops-into his head...
<snip>By the technical definition, many cis women are not female.
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula ... nt-2141724Athywren - not the moon you're looking for
14 July 2022 at 3:48 am
I do appreciate one thing about what Fred had to say – he ably demonstrates that defining us by our gametes is not limited to denying trans women their womanhood, or trans men their manhood but extends into denying the same to cis people if they aren’t producing the relevant gametes. It shows quite clearly how completely useless it is as a social definition.
I also quite like how it flatly contradicts the “sex is binary and immutable” idea that often accompanies it when actually taken to its logical conclusion.
That tweet of his was from December of last year.Service Dog wrote: ↑He doesn't stop to consider the implications of his filler. So he inadvertently agrees with you on What Is A Woman.
Make up your mind PZ - if you have one. Shit or get off the pot.So you’re saying my wife and my granddaughter are not female, because they don’t meet your fucking “necessary” condition? And you claim that I agree with that?
Think you're grabbing at straws, cutting something from whole cloth. Maybe PZ harbors some secret fantasy of such a Master Race, but don't think he gave any indication of it being more than that.Service Dog wrote: ↑Then, when he tries to extricate himself from-that-- with more filler-- he inadvertently agrees with Hitler... that a "master race" is a real thing, easily achievable, with a little Progressive Eugenics + Authoritarianism.
He's a fraud, talking out of both sides of his mouth. Or has a short memory, and doesn't like being corrected or reminded of what he said.Service Dog wrote: ↑ He's messy.
free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ tucker rape apologist.PNG
you would think Tucker would vet his stories better.
Called it. Not that I said anything here or anywhere else.Service Dog wrote: ↑free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ tucker rape apologist.PNG
you would think Tucker would vet his stories better.
It doesn't get any clearer that that. The extent of free_thoughtpolice's derangement... on Full Display.
Posting here, at this haven for rapists, that Tucker Carlson is a "rape apologist".
What else? Is he a Slymepitter ?!! An "MRA" ?!
.
.
Matt Christiansen is very good at leaving no-stone-unturned.
MC asks why the rapist was allowed to continue living with his victim-- for 2 months after the 'child abuse specialist' was notified of the rape.
MC asks what role the 'sanctuary city' protection of illegal immigrants -- had in the official inaction.
MC asks whether we should blindly trust that the victim's "mother" is who she says she is. Or, if she indeed-is the mothe: how do we know that she is speaking freely & honestly/ in a time of cartel sex trafficking (abetted by Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, DHS goofball Alejandro Mayorkas, Open Borders Advocates & Feminist Abortion Activists.)
..
AndrewV69 wrote: ↑ My default these days is to be skeptical of anything reported, starting with the weather reports unless I can fact check it myself (who da fuck has the time to do that?)
(unless it confirms my already existing biases, which makes it TRUE and CONFIRMED /s)
Whatever man. Fuck! (Die Antwoord)
