If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑

John D wrote: ↑ Here is the official news from National Public Radio... you know... the radio broadcast that is subsidized by the Federal Government in the US.
[LIES & NONSENSE]
Please take note. I am not exaggerating this. The entire panel blamed this story on the alt-right whipping people up and telling lies about the land and about the violence.

NPR has become National Trans Radio instead, with a blatant agenda and a callous disregard for the institution they're turning into the left-wing Fox News. I only listen now when I'm driving tired and want to angry myself awake woke.

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Dumbass.

https://imgur.com/kuTWoSP.png

https://imgur.com/K1x2hVI.png

https://imgur.com/qoS85ta.png

(No links. Tweets are deleted, account is private)

free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Hopefully these types of assholes are a small minority. Dailystormer has an article about how the victim of the illegal Mexican rapist/murderer happened to have killed a white woman that held anti-white sentiments. Irony in the extreme.
https://dailystormer.name/lol-dreamer-m ... te-people/

free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Dumbass.

https://imgur.com/kuTWoSP.png

https://imgur.com/K1x2hVI.png

https://imgur.com/qoS85ta.png

(No links. Tweets are deleted, account is private)

Hopefully these types of assholes are a small minority. Dailystormer has an article about how the victim of the illegal Mexican rapist/murderer happened to have killed a white woman that held anti-white sentiments. Irony in the extreme.
https://dailystormer.name/lol-dreamer-m ... te-people/

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Candidate Wu shares Frank's man-cave with the audience.

https://imgur.com/jxd8h8I.jpg

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ There is something odd about seeing someone in a western suit unironically ‘doing the dance’

Best you swap to Ezra.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ There is something odd about seeing someone in a western suit unironically ‘doing the dance’

Lsuoma wrote: ↑

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Candidate Wu shares Frank's man-cave with the audience.

https://imgur.com/jxd8h8I.jpg

You're a sick fuck, Apers...

DaveDodo007 wrote: ↑

CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑ The #MeToo bandwagon gets around to former Scottish National Party leader, and now Russia Today shill host, Alex Salmond.

There was always something fishy about him. Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke. :lol:

What's even better, is it means he is involved in a legal battle with his beloved SNP, led by Nicola Sturgeon. The whole saga is rather fishy.

ME And you have always known the retarded mongs were always projecting, nearly all lefty/liberals like fucking kids the peado scum sucking maggots. Thought even here we are no allowed to point out the lefty/liberal peado ways. OK ban me for pointing out that all (yes all) lefty/liberals love to abuse and fuck children. THE SICK fucks and fuck them.

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Candidate Wu shares Frank's man-cave with the audience.

https://imgur.com/jxd8h8I.jpg

AndrewV69 wrote: ↑

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑

AndrewV69 wrote: ↑

Using Mollie Tibbetts name as a twitter handle is shameful.

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ The allegation is that this was her own Twitter account, and she posted this. Ergo, she deserved to die, apparently.

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ if the perp had turned out to be some creepy 40yo white man, you know the leftist narrative would all be about toxic masculinity and white evilness.

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ Looking at those photos makes me think Meyers needs to be very careful indeed tweeting stuff like this:

https://i.imgur.com/2tsU9rv.png

Suet Cardigan wrote: ↑ ...
FFS. What next? Sacking someone from their job because their great-grandad was bad at his job?

To be absolutely clear, what feminists call "toxic masculinity" — socializing men to believe that being a man means being aggressive and domineering — leads to all those men killing other men, too.

alflybear
1 second ago
What I think is really sad is about how the alt-right types are bringing up a tweet Mollie made saying "I hate white men" and saying it is hilarious that she got raped and murdered by an MOC.
Disgusting how these creeps are using this tragedy to further their racist agenda instead of being productive and using it to better our society by furthering our misandrist agenda.

Guest_b8931fdb wrote: ↑ I think Trump's an unstable asshole but I also think Trump derangement syndrome is real....

So, thought experiment, what would happen if Trump had tweeted out the exact same tweet:

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Candidate Wu shares Frank's man-cave with the audience.

https://imgur.com/jxd8h8I.jpg

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑I want to see Meyers's little face in there by the end of today, or I'm going home and not coming back.

Tigzy wrote: ↑ 'Brianna San, use of your man-cave would make tempting offer, but for skinhead midget guarding it.'

shoutinghorse wrote: ↑ Ditto BeckyBooze.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ What does it mean when Becky does rabbit ears when she uses the word “legally” in relation to immigration .....

She is filth and she needs to be stopped.

Part of this dissonance stemmed from the fact that ordinary Americans understood Bin Laden on an emotional level much better than their media and intellectual elites did. Regardless of the mainstream narrative, Bin Laden’s magnum opus was not the deaths of 3000 Americans, it wasn’t even the notion that large-scale terrorist attack could happen in America. Instead, the sheikh’s legacy was, a challenge for which the theatrics of the collapsing world trade center was a framing device. Osama’s legacy was an accusation that Western power -as far-reaching and as unquestioned as it remained in the early years of the 21st century – was at its core, hollow and built on a foundation of decadence.

For all the cultural self-criticism the West had undergone since the 1960s, Osama Bin Laden was the first to announce the weakness of modern man, not with critical theory or deconstruction, but with a declaration of war and a call to battle. Bin Laden was the first to wager that, underneath the mountainous wealth and military might of America and its European allies, was a “Weak Horse” that when the chips were down, no one would choose support. And for all the congratulations being exchanged in the spring of 2011, Bin Laden’s death had not answered his accusation.

On the left, we heard assurances that the jihadist ideology did not represent mainstream attitudes in the Muslim world and that further attacks could be managed easily by the reformation of American foreign and domestic policy. On the right we heard pronouncements that the attacks were the product of a small group of extremists and that the threat could be addressed through military action and a renewed commitment to national security. The message, over and over, was to stay calm, stay tolerant, go shopping, and to let the professionals manage the professional problem of global security. Besides, it worked in the cold war didn’t it?

Following the events of September 11th and an enormous wave of immigration, many among Europe’s self-assured elites were developing a desire to witness secular humanism’s victory over their countries’ newly initiated Muslim citizens. After all, if America’s wars had so obviously failed in winning the hearts and minds of the Islamic world, what better way to demonstrate the dominance of Europe’s peaceful humanitarianism, than to transform the newly immigrated Muslim into a modern secular European within the confines of the modern European welfare state?

The prospect, was too juicy to be undesired. And in response to this desire, the Danish satirical magazine, Jyllands-Posten published a set of 10 cartoons depicting the Muslim prophet Mohammad in irreverent and satirical contexts. The publication knew it was courting controversy, but no doubt the editors anticipated something akin to controversies generated by anti-Christian satire in the 20th century: a quick and lucrative outrage, followed by the full-throated support of the global “free-speech” community, concluding with total victory of irreverent secularism over traditionalist busybodies. Few in 2005 suspected how wrong this anticipation might be.

After this what more could be hoped for from a rootless Westerner dreaming of some liberation in global cosmopolitanism? To be a citizen of the world among a growing number of people who had no interest in granting your cherished principles? A rebellion against anything traditional, so long as that rebellion never crossed the piety of the most puritanical imams? It was one thing to be the “Weak Horse” on the battleground of Tikrit, quite another to be the “Weak Horse” in the culture of one’s homeland. No one could want this role for themselves. And no one did. And sure enough, a reaction was in the works.

Ape+lust wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 25, 2018 12:54 pm

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑I want to see Meyers's little face in there by the end of today, or I'm going home and not coming back.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 25, 2018 1:36 pm

What does it mean when Becky does rabbit ears when she uses the word “legally” in relation to immigration .....

Bernie Sanders's fear of immigrant labor is ugly — and wrongheaded
By Dylan Matthews@dylanmattdylan@vox.com Jul 29, 2015, 8:30am EDT

If I could add one amendment to the Constitution, it would be the one Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Robert Bartley once proposed: "There shall be open borders." There is no single policy that the United States could adopt that would do more good for more people. An average Nigerian worker can increase his income almost 15-fold just by moving to the United States, and residents of significantly richer countries like Mexico can more than double their earnings. The humanitarian gains of letting everyone who wants to make that leap do so would be astounding.

So I was disappointed, if not surprised, at the visceral horror with which Bernie Sanders reacted to the idea when interviewed by my colleague Ezra Klein. "Open borders?" he interjected. "No, that's a Koch brothers proposal." The idea, he argued, is a right-wing scheme meant to flood the US with cheap labor and depress wages for native-born workers. "I think from a moral responsibility, we've got to work with the rest of the industrialized world to address the problems of international poverty," he conceded, "but you don't do that by making people in this country even poorer."

There are two problems with Sanders's view on this, one empirical and one moral....

Brive1987 wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 25, 2018 1:36 pm

and she needs to be stopped.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ What does it mean when Becky does rabbit ears when she uses the word “legally” in relation to immigration .....

She is filth and she needs to be stopped.

Ape+lust wrote: ↑ Look who enjoys tranny porn :D

https://imgur.com/qZv1Fo3.jpg

Credit goes to Private Dick Muscato for the heads up.

Keating wrote: ↑ https://viaobscuramedia.com/2018/08/25/ ... bin-laden/

In was the hipster, the diversity consultant, and the progressive fanboy. This was not a time for righteous rebels, this was the age of nihilists with no chests, urbanites who defined themselves through consumption, and technocrats congratulating themselves on far-off plans to solve humanity’s problems with “science!”. This was the age of the eternally offended social justice warrior and the pathetically sycophantic pop culture consumer. A society whose visionaries, from Steve Jobs to Barack Obama, seemed to have little interested in planning for anything other than a post-national, post-hardship, and post-scarcity future. A civilization where one might define themselves as consumers of organic food, video games, or queer paraphernalia, but never believers in tradition, posterity, nationhood, or faith.

free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑

Brive1987 wrote: ↑ What does it mean when Becky does rabbit ears when she uses the word “legally” in relation to immigration .....

She is filth and she needs to be stopped.

Like needs to be raped and murdered by an illegal immigrant? When they say illegal immigrants do the work white people won't do they are probably talking about more than picking lettuce. Like disciplining skanky white feminists by raping and killing them. Probably the only way the whiny cockboxes will give up their slutty ways and embrace traditional values like making white babies.
Amirite? :violence-blades:

rayshul wrote: ↑ Looks like there's maybe 50 people at SWW

By weight though it's probably double that

Why are these people almost always fat

CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑ Of course the Right will exaggerate the situation in South Africa, and of course the Left will downplay/ignore/deny it. The truth is in the middle, as usual.

The Right don't have anything to lose on this, but the Left will have egg on their face again, just like Rotherham, if they go down the deny route. Stuff is happening in SA, and we have various Communist Black Supremacists admitting their intentions.

In the UK, the Left try to conveniently ignore that they tried to cover up the sex abuse scandals under the cover of "political correctness". They will make the same mistake in South Africa, as it becomes Zimbabwe 2.0.

free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ I'm fine Brive. I was just wondering if you took the extra step from alt-lite to alt-right. The last time I saw one of your graphs you were just about on the borderline.