Fuck off, Jamie!

Old subthreads
Locked
Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3841

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

Some of the same twitterati [that I do admire] are telling me we have to remember Kimmel is innocent until proven guilty, and we shouldn't take pleasure in seeing feminists and the legal system crawl up his asshole have also been telling me that it's good Alex Jones has been kicked off twitter, and that Trump is certainly, definitely a Kremlin puppet and not just a rich idiot asshole.

Sigh. Trump's election has fucked us all over in so many ways.

And still, fuck Hillary, she was shit and should never have been Presidette.

TheMudbrooker
.
.
Posts: 786
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:15 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3842

Post by TheMudbrooker »

Since we're in the midst of an extended pitkill, here's some nice on hold music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1uEy-n4IsU

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3843

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Is one of the holes in BeckyBooze's wetsuit a hole directly in front of her front hole? Cuz in that case, the entire San Francisco Bay ecosystem is at risk and fucking EPA should pay for a new wetsuit.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3844

Post by MarcusAu »

I used to think that Watson could take a break and rethink her life choices, so she could achieve something useful in the world.

But there seems to be a narcissistic core to her personality - and despite the lack of attention she has received in recent years - nothing has changed.

Ah well. May she receive the relevance she deserves.

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3845

Post by John D »

39878798_1818758341494348_2562832351600050176_n.jpg
(70.99 KiB) Downloaded 348 times

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3846

Post by MarcusAu »

You are a sick man John.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3847

Post by Brive1987 »

Australian female politicians are a tough bunch.
One Liberal MP has reportedly told the Australian Financial Review that the Whip’s office has received four complaints from female MPs saying they felt intimidated when asked to sign the petition, which they refused to do.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3848

Post by Keating »

Woo! Prime Minister Dutton seems to be about to happen.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3849

Post by Keating »


free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3850

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Another good article:
https://politichicks.com/2018/07/why-th ... o-succeed/
That Sheila, unlike phony Lauren Southern did not get her blonde from a bleach bottle! I'm thinking The alt-journalism produced by Australia is likely under appreciated.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3851

Post by KiwiInOz »

dogen wrote:
Wed Aug 22, 2018 7:30 am
snip

Black mark? Suck my dick and balls, you racist fronthole!
Who are you calling a fronthole, backhole?

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3852

Post by KiwiInOz »

Keating wrote: Woo! Prime Minister Dutton seems to be about to happen.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.


some guy
.
.
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:05 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3853

Post by some guy »

Carrier has set a trap!
Dr Richard Carrier, Ph.D., peer-reviewed author and brilliant legal strategist wrote: "But I believe Dadabhoy is acting with deliberate malice. She may have lied to the other Defendants about our interactions—and my interactions with others. Her involvement might be even more sinister. I have so far reserved for future use in court evidence I have that Dadabhoy might have coordinated defaming me with Amy Frank and Lauren Lane. I am awaiting the opportunity to catch her in perjury before I reveal it."
Although one problem is that if you set a trap, it isn't really a good idea to announce to the person you hope to trap that you've set a trap. (Because now you can be sure that when Heina Dadabhoy's lawyer is deposing him, one question to him will be "What evidence do you have to support your claim that my client conspired with Amy and Lauren to defame you?")

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3854

Post by free thoughtpolice »

some guy wrote: Carrier has set a trap!
Dr Richard Carrier, Ph.D., peer-reviewed author and brilliant legal strategist wrote: "But I believe Dadabhoy is acting with deliberate malice. She may have lied to the other Defendants about our interactions—and my interactions with others. Her involvement might be even more sinister. I have so far reserved for future use in court evidence I have that Dadabhoy might have coordinated defaming me with Amy Frank and Lauren Lane. I am awaiting the opportunity to catch her in perjury before I reveal it."
Although one problem is that if you set a trap, it isn't really a good idea to announce to the person you hope to trap that you've set a trap. (Because now you can be sure that when Heina Dadabhoy's lawyer is deposing him, one question to him will be "What evidence do you have to support your claim that my client conspired with Amy and Lauren to defame you?")
A little like hiding in a duck blind and jumping up and making lots of noise to scare the ducks off before they get into shotgun range.
The ducks will think that you are much too stupid to be a duck hunter and land right beside you.
Don't underestimate Dr. Carrier. It's his strategy to say and do monumentally stupid stuff just to trick you into underestimating him. :ugeek:

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3855

Post by Brive1987 »

Nice. A tweet that falls into two marginalised Slymepit topics at once!


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3856

Post by Brive1987 »


Bourne Skeptic
.
.
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:18 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3857

Post by Bourne Skeptic »

For those interested.

Audio gets better after about 5 min.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFu-COndJsE

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3858

Post by Brive1987 »

Apparently Australia’s politics and road signs have found commonality.

http://i.imgur.com/r6ceXgP.jpg

We have survived for three days without a Federal government. I say let’s contunue the experiment.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3859

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Brive1987 wrote: Nice. A tweet that falls into two marginalised Slymepit topics at once!


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3860

Post by Brive1987 »

There you go, introducing that word into the fray again. Just rejoice someone is giving a damn.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy ... 22c06d6476

Guest_b8931fdb

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3861

Post by Guest_b8931fdb »

An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3862

Post by Keating »

I’ve just been watching the Drum. I find it incredibly ironic for the ABC to go along with the idea that NewsCorp and Sky News were bullying MPs to switch away from Turnbull. This is the same (publicly funded) station continuously broadcasting the most incredulous people they could find in Dutton’s seat. What a joke. Privatise the ABC. (And I don’t even think Dutton would be good for Australia, let alone the LNP).

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3863

Post by Brive1987 »





#teamwest

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3864

Post by Brive1987 »

Trappes has a population of around 30,000 and is known for problems linked to poverty, gangs and hardline interpretations of Islam
Liberal civic nationalism ticking over nicely.

They urgently need to contract Kirb to deliver his civic classes.

DrokkIt
.
.
Posts: 1327
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: Brit-Cit

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3865

Post by DrokkIt »

Brive1987 wrote:



#teamwest
Don't you think that the depths of hyperbole that lead to the statement"Paris is a shithole" simply make the 'message' here less likely to be heard?

Despite their problems, Paris and London are huge tourist destinations where people go for fun all the time- most are not going to by that 'London has fallen' whatsoever if they have any proximity to the UK they will know that it hasn't.

Genuinely wonder why this kind of highly polarised approach (i.e. where the leading story is ridiculously OTT) seems so popular with a certain crease in the spectrum. Wouldn't you rather just present factual evidence for a problem without PJW heights of over-amped rhetoric?

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3866

Post by shoutinghorse »

It's okay everyone, it was only a domestic, only women were killed and there is no proof whatsoever it had anything to do with Alan. Got that?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45281902

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3867

Post by SM1957 »

Did the attacker have any mental health problems?

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3868

Post by John D »

shoutinghorse wrote: It's okay everyone, it was only a domestic, only women were killed and there is no proof whatsoever it had anything to do with Alan. Got that?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45281902
Suicide by cop....hmmmm... I wonder if he still gets the virgins in heaven after this?

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3869

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

free thoughtpolice wrote: Don't underestimate Dr. Carrier. It's his strategy to say and do monumentally stupid stuff just to trick you into underestimating him. :ugeek:
Since he's already pointedly described himself only as "of average length", there's little chance of underestimating his calibre.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3870

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Brive1987 wrote: Nice. A tweet that falls into two marginalised Slymepit topics at once!

This will induce affluent white americans to rant in public that affluent white south africans deserve to be dispossessed, raped & murdered.

What with the hysteria over illegal immigrants babies in dog kennels, the Dems are bound to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory this coming November. Another Evergreen or Melissa Click college campus melt-down -- or better yet, another negro career criminal shot while resisting arrest -- would seal the deal.

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3871

Post by John D »

DrokkIt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:



#teamwest
Don't you think that the depths of hyperbole that lead to the statement"Paris is a shithole" simply make the 'message' here less likely to be heard?

Despite their problems, Paris and London are huge tourist destinations where people go for fun all the time- most are not going to by that 'London has fallen' whatsoever if they have any proximity to the UK they will know that it hasn't.

Genuinely wonder why this kind of highly polarised approach (i.e. where the leading story is ridiculously OTT) seems so popular with a certain crease in the spectrum. Wouldn't you rather just present factual evidence for a problem without PJW heights of over-amped rhetoric?
This sounds much like what happened to New York in the 1980s. The city had become a literal shithole. But... people still visited and vacationed there. Some people even enjoyed the danger, drugs, crime. Some people said that the streets full of porn theaters was just part of the New York experience.

For me, I went to NYC in 1981 , hated it, nearly got mugged in broad daylight and concluded I wouldn't go back. But, they started to clean things up. Crime went down. Porn theaters closed. Proactive policing meant that you wouldn't be menaced on the train platform by thugs. So, my wife and I have returned. When we go we spend a butt-load of money because it's not cheap. But.... I wouldn't go if it was the NYC from the 80s.

I am sure there are still lots of people who love Paris, but I think they are going to have to turn their problems around. The people who live there are not going to tolerate this for long. Just my 2c.

and... regarding South Africa. Just stating the statistics that there are still only a few farm murders misses the point. Like many violent countries, SA farmers used to feel safe because most crime was urban and gang related. This is why people still live in the Chicago and Detroit area. It is because we know most of the violence is gang related. We feel like it is statistically unlikely to hit our suburban homes. But, farmers in SA are feeling like they are being specifically targeted by brutal animals. Most people can't live like this. And... to top it off... framers in SA get in trouble for defending themselves. At least in the US they call you a hero if you kill someone who broken into your home. At least we can violently defend ourselves. I suspect the number of white farmers in South Africa will quickly plummet. They will sell when they can. The ones who stay will have turned their farms into an armed camp. Of course, farmland must be losing value like crazy right now.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3872

Post by comhcinc »

Bourne Skeptic wrote: For those interested.

Audio gets better after about 5 min.

Video
Does Peterson's mic get shut off?

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3873

Post by MarcusAu »

I was listening to an interview with Terrence McKenna - in which he said that 15 seconds after taking DMT he was no longer an atheist.

I think Crowley came to the same conclusion after his experiments with yoga, hashish and peyote.

Anyone else think that with the right drugs their lack of faith would dissolve like an aspirin in water?

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3874

Post by comhcinc »

I don't know. What you got?

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3875

Post by John D »

MarcusAu wrote: I was listening to an interview with Terrence McKenna - in which he said that 15 seconds after taking DMT he was no longer an atheist.

I think Crowley came to the same conclusion after his experiments with yoga, hashish and peyote.

Anyone else think that with the right drugs their lack of faith would dissolve like an aspirin in water?
Yep. I have read most of the Bible, the Koran, the Gita, the Book of the Dead... etc. I have a keen interest in religion and religious thought. But, I remain an atheist. I think the reason for this is that I have never had the kind of emotional event to change me. I am highly stubborn and skeptical. So, even though I spend lots of time and mental energy on religious topics... a never "dive" in.

But, I am smart enough to know that I don't really have "control" of my motivations and feelings. For example, I have given up trying to explain why I am so dedicated to my wife or my dog. I don't know what forces power my emotions. The fact that I spend time caring for them somehow just makes me more dedicated. Weird stuff.

I have witnessed people who have had life changing revelations from drug use. I knew a guy who converted from Islam to Christianity after one single LSD trip. And he was totally committed. So, I just don't know. Would certain drugs actually change who I am in a fundamental way? It is possible. If so, is this even the right thing to do? I really don't know.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3876

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

John D wrote:
Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:54 am
DrokkIt wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:



#teamwest
Don't you think that the depths of hyperbole that lead to the statement"Paris is a shithole" simply make the 'message' here less likely to be heard?

Despite their problems, Paris and London are huge tourist destinations where people go for fun all the time- most are not going to by that 'London has fallen' whatsoever if they have any proximity to the UK they will know that it hasn't.

Genuinely wonder why this kind of highly polarised approach (i.e. where the leading story is ridiculously OTT) seems so popular with a certain crease in the spectrum. Wouldn't you rather just present factual evidence for a problem without PJW heights of over-amped rhetoric?
This sounds much like what happened to New York in the 1980s. The city had become a literal shithole. But... people still visited and vacationed there. Some people even enjoyed the danger, drugs, crime. Some people said that the streets full of porn theaters was just part of the New York experience.

For me, I went to NYC in 1981 , hated it, nearly got mugged in broad daylight and concluded I wouldn't go back. But, they started to clean things up. Crime went down. Porn theaters closed. Proactive policing meant that you wouldn't be menaced on the train platform by thugs. So, my wife and I have returned. When we go we spend a butt-load of money because it's not cheap. But.... I wouldn't go if it was the NYC from the 80s.

I am sure there are still lots of people who love Paris, but I think they are going to have to turn their problems around. The people who live there are not going to tolerate this for long. Just my 2c.

and... regarding South Africa. Just stating the statistics that there are still only a few farm murders misses the point. Like many violent countries, SA farmers used to feel safe because most crime was urban and gang related. This is why people still live in the Chicago and Detroit area. It is because we know most of the violence is gang related. We feel like it is statistically unlikely to hit our suburban homes. But, farmers in SA are feeling like they are being specifically targeted by brutal animals. Most people can't live like this. And... to top it off... framers in SA get in trouble for defending themselves. At least in the US they call you a hero if you kill someone who broken into your home. At least we can violently defend ourselves. I suspect the number of white farmers in South Africa will quickly plummet. They will sell when they can. The ones who stay will have turned their farms into an armed camp. Of course, farmland must be losing value like crazy right now.
Never mind the murders, you'd have to be crazy to buy a farm in South Africa while white when some moneygrubbing yahoos can decide at any time that their ancestors musta owned it.

The real number of farm murders is not represented in the crime stats and the realstic figures demonstrate that farmers are many times more likely to be mudered than the rest of the population. They may even be the most at risk group in the world. The farmers I know don't go anywhere without their weapons. It is one thing to fear being attacked but quite another to know that your children may be tortrued to death and your partner brutally raped and killed while you are forced to watched. The added element that makes the farm attacks noteworthy is that there is some evidence of major political players being involved.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3877

Post by MarcusAu »

I'm assuming you are dedicated to your wife and your dog for different reasons.

As to the rest...I've run it up the flagpole - let's see who salutes it.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3878

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.
Read the whole thread by Claire Lehman. The problems involved go deeper than racism against whites, and Southern's and others histrionics are hurting rather than helping white farmers. One of the easiest ways to get the vast public to dismiss a serious problem is having an obvious demagogue represent a cause, especially if they misrepresent the facts.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3879

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.
Read the whole thread by Claire Lehman. The problems involved go deeper than racism against whites, and Southern's and others histrionics are hurting rather than helping white farmers. One of the easiest ways to get the vast public to dismiss a serious problem is having an obvious demagogue represent a cause, especially if they misrepresent the facts.
Sorry, Voltaire, not Lehman.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3880

Post by Tigzy »

Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.
Likewise, there are very few convictions for hate crime offences in comparison to regular offences, so let's not bother tackling hate crime.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3881

Post by SM1957 »

Another Labour MP has spoken up about the issues of our time
Attachments
Image 1.jpg
(105.33 KiB) Downloaded 123 times

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3882

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Meyers announces he is going to Steph Svwzan's Women in Secularism conference this weekend.

I looked at her kickstarter, and her stretch goals for it were interesting.

For Steph, it appears that a free lunch for conference attendess is more important than providing travel grants for the under-privileged.

https://i.imgur.com/jRNMf8U.png

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3883

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »


ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3884

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Weird. Try this:

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3885

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

kickstarter.com/projects/1033564734/secular-women-work-returns

Leaving out https/www.

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3886

Post by screwtape »

Her spark gap, unlike her thigh gap, is too big. She will misfire.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3887

Post by free thoughtpolice »

MarcusAu wrote: I was listening to an interview with Terrence McKenna - in which he said that 15 seconds after taking DMT he was no longer an atheist.

I think Crowley came to the same conclusion after his experiments with yoga, hashish and peyote.

Anyone else think that with the right drugs their lack of faith would dissolve like an aspirin in water?
I talked to God when I was high on LSD. He told me he didn't exist and I should take it easy on the acid.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3888

Post by free thoughtpolice »

:rimshot:

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7903
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3889

Post by MarcusAu »

free thoughtpolice wrote: I talked to God when I was high on LSD. He told me he didn't exist and I should take it easy on the acid.
It sounds like nobody cares about you.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3890

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Tigzy wrote: Likewise, there are very few convictions for hate crime offences in comparison to regular offences, so let's not bother tackling hate crime.
Actually, let's not, as hate is not a crime.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3891

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

free thoughtpolice wrote: I talked to God when I was high on LSD. He told me he didn't exist and I should take it easy on the acid.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3892

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

screwtape wrote:
Her spark gap, unlike her thigh gap, is too big. She will misfire.
Uhh, that's not a spark plug, it's a vibrator.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3893

Post by free thoughtpolice »

MarcusAu wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: I talked to God when I was high on LSD. He told me he didn't exist and I should take it easy on the acid.
It sounds like nobody cares about you.
Oh yeah? I bet Jesus doesn't love you either. :P

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3894

Post by Ape+lust »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: Meyers announces he is going to Steph Svwzan's Women in Secularism conference this weekend.

I looked at her kickstarter, and her stretch goals for it were interesting.

For Steph, it appears that a free lunch for conference attendess is more important than providing travel grants for the under-privileged.

https://i.imgur.com/jRNMf8U.png
If 100 people show (hah!), that's a $30 meal. "Box lunch" must mean "rack of ribs" to Zvan.

At the 1st conference, stretch goals covered extra speakers before they went to buying chow.

https://imgur.com/AQhbqpr.png

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/10 ... conference

Look at the ticket prices. Peez is going all-out to win back Zvan's approval.

https://imgur.com/oMOAXPR.png

http://secularwomenwork.org/2018/05/get-your-tickets/

Google thinks Stef's an old fart.

https://imgur.com/Hoq3kGK.png

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3895

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

From Meyers's Octodon, which is the Twitter alternative he is trying to adopt while also posting on the evil capitalist Twitter. Hypocritical arsehole.

Has he confused Aretha with another famous black female singer?

https://i.imgur.com/mmjIzdH.png

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3896

Post by Lsuoma »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: Don't underestimate Dr. Carrier. It's his strategy to say and do monumentally stupid stuff just to trick you into underestimating him. :ugeek:
Since he's already pointedly described himself only as "of average length", there's little chance of underestimating his calibre.
How do you know he's not packing a choad?

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3897

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Thu Aug 23, 2018 6:44 am
Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.
Read the whole thread by Claire Lehman. The problems involved go deeper than racism against whites, and Southern's and others histrionics are hurting rather than helping white farmers. One of the easiest ways to get the vast public to dismiss a serious problem is having an obvious demagogue represent a cause, especially if they misrepresent the facts.
Firstly, what makes you so sure Southern is misrepresenting the facts? Secondly, the vast public doesn't need any help dismissing a problem which they might not even know about in the first place in the absence of "demagogues" like Southern.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3898

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: From Meyers's Octodon, which is the Twitter alternative he is trying to adopt while also posting on the evil capitalist Twitter. Hypocritical arsehole.

Has he confused Aretha with another famous black female singer?

https://i.imgur.com/mmjIzdH.png
I should never assume gender, I guess..

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3899

Post by John D »

Tim Pool discusses how social media edits and plays down the South Africa story.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: Fuck off, Jamie!

#3900

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Thu Aug 23, 2018 6:44 am
Guest_b8931fdb wrote:
An average of 52 people die in SA every day due to violent crime that's just over 19000 people a year. Farm murders stand at 1.8 a week.
I've seen this all over the place today, and while I have no clue as to what is happening in South Africa, I am not sure this is the best argument to ignore it.

Very few planes crash, so let's focus on breast cancer, there is little to be gained by spending time on airplane safety.
Very few Americans had lead in their pipes, so it's okay to ignore Detroit.
In 2017, just 17 unarmed black men were killed by police, so we really need to focus on murders in general.
Read the whole thread by Claire Lehman. The problems involved go deeper than racism against whites, and Southern's and others histrionics are hurting rather than helping white farmers. One of the easiest ways to get the vast public to dismiss a serious problem is having an obvious demagogue represent a cause, especially if they misrepresent the facts.
Firstly, what makes you so sure Southern is misrepresenting the facts? Secondly, the vast public doesn't need any help dismissing a problem which they might not even know about in the first place in the absence of "demagogues" like Southern.
The thread discusses how Southern misrepresented facts. As to Southern, her reach is only with people already in agreement with her. For most people, it is an easy excuse to dismiss the real problems along with her hyperbole. Imagine if Alex Jones discovered an alien cabal, a real one. Who the fuck would believe him? Some people are have a very toxic brand.

What is happening in South Africa is a crime. It's wrong, it has distinctly racist overtones and it should be investigated. But It's not genocide. And the far-right hyperbole allows people to dismiss the whole thing as a white supremacist conspiracy.

I'm glad Trump is looking into it, even though that will further marginalize the issue with knee-jerk types. If you want results, poke reputable journalism outlets into covering the story, not attention hogs or drama llamas.

Locked