In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

Old subthreads
Sulman
.
.
Posts: 2057
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:13 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12661

Post by Sulman »

Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:The extent of Steersman's conversational skills with the opposite sex start with "How much"? , and ends with "But I paid for an entire hour. Can I get a refund for the unused fifty seven minutes" ?
"We started our union at timestamp 1491078845, it is now only 1491078890, I am paid up until 1491082505. Would you like to do something else? Maybe view some logs covering the event?"

John D
.
.
Posts: 5966
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:23 am
Location: Detroit, MI. USA

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12662

Post by John D »

Totally off topic, but I watched this (Young Frankenstein) on Netflix last night and it made me very happy.


Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12663

Post by Steersman »

Tigzy wrote:I don't get why people keep taking the piss out of Steersman's seduction skills and wit - I bet if you heard him in the original binary, you'd think you were in the presence of a chrome-plated Casanova.
:) I'm great with my loved ones - and zeros ... :rimshot:

Somewhat apropos of which, ran across a couple of posts from Paul Elam at A Voice for Men on the "hot" topic of sex robots:
https://www.avoiceformen.com/men/sex-ro ... -robotics/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... -doll.html
https://www.avoiceformen.com/men/sex-ro ... threshold/

Somewhat amusing or "sardonic" ["bitter irony"] comment from Elam in the first post:
Replicating the feel of human skin, and therefore physical human contact, is an incredibly difficult objective. We are nowhere near the technological advancement required to produce a simple handshake that could pass for human, much less the daunting goal of approximating full, body to body contact complete with full sexual activity.

And that, after all, would seem to be the tipping point. It’s not just inventing a robot that you can fuck. It’s inventing a robot that fucks you. That objective, the punishing demand of the animatronics needed to enable a sex robot to approximate responsive sexual intercourse, is staggering in its difficulty.

And that will be the game changer, especially for blue pill men. As things stand most of them will balk on taking the robotic dive. If they wanted to hump a cold, unresponsive and inanimate lump of artificiality, they’d just get married.
:shock:

But, in the two birds, one stone department, and just because I know you love to talk about ova ;)
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/frie ... 3569281432

Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12664

Post by Bhurzum »

Steersman wrote:I'm great with my loved ones - and zeros ... :rimshot:
What about non-bina...fuck it, I'll get me coat early.

:bjarte:

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12665

Post by Steersman »

Kirbmarc wrote:
Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote:If you're not incredibly ugly, you don't dress like a dork, you care about personal grooming, you have a good haircut, you're in a decent shape, you can handle a flirty conversation without getting tongue-tied, you can crack a few good jokes and you go out and meet people often maybe you won't get all the hotties you dream about, but you can get laid by other decent-looking people often enough to be happy, especially if you approach enough people.

This is true for both men and women. I'd say that it's even easier for out-of-shape women to get laid than it is for out-of-shape men.

Finding worthwhile long-term partners is harder of course.
And then there's Steersman :ugeek:
you can handle a flirty conversation without getting tongue-tied, you can crack a few good jokes
:bjarte:
:o Maybe it's just because so many I run across just have a poor sense of humour? Takes two to tango and all that ... ;-)
https://twitter.com/SteersMann/status/9 ... 7985477632
https://twitter.com/SteersMann/status/9 ... 2820641792

But, another two-birds-one-stone comment relative to a recent post of yours, if I'm not mistaken, about "Women's Studies" - an interview of Paglia by Jordan Peterson: https://twitter.com/SteersMann/status/9 ... 5136104449

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12666

Post by Steersman »

Bhurzum wrote:
Steersman wrote:I'm great with my loved ones - and zeros ... :rimshot:
What about non-bina...fuck it, I'll get me coat early.

:bjarte:
:lol:

Though some justification for arguing that it's binary all the way down, more or less, short of what preceded the Big Bang. Even sex can be framed as either "produces gametes" (male, female) OR doesn't produce gametes (girls, "menopausees", eunuchs, transwomen, etc). ;-)

Barbie's Boyfriend
.
.
Posts: 762
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:29 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12667

Post by Barbie's Boyfriend »

Steersman reminds me of some market advice.

Buy Steersman for what he is actually worth.

Sell him for what he THINKS he is worth

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12668

Post by Brive1987 »

VickyCaramel wrote:
DownThunder wrote:
There's enough morsels in the article to leave a trail, ie the instagram post.

I believe this is a potential match.

https://www.facebook.com/aScienceEnthusiast/

Has over 800,000 followers, their name is associated with the instagram post........ :think:
I don't do Facebook, I am not sure 800,000 followers actually counts for anything. He only has about 3k on Twitter, has no Youtube Channel but does livestreams it seems. He did one with Thomas Smith about a month ago and it only has about 10k views. That isn't much.
Bingo. https://www.facebook.com/TheRealScience ... 9565958708

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12669

Post by Steersman »

Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:Steersman reminds me of some market advice.

Buy Steersman for what he is actually worth.

Sell him for what he THINKS he is worth
LoL. You might make a lot less than what you apparently think you would.

Besides which, think you're engaging in the same fuzzy thinking - being charitable and not surprisingly - that is exhibited by those who want to criminalize prostitution by referring to women "selling their bodies". How would they get home afterwards? ...

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12670

Post by Ape+lust »

Everybody can go home now. She's made the perfect thought-stopper.

https://i.imgur.com/PNPfkV8.png

This should be quality trollbait, yet all I see in the thread are "Me too!" from women and "Ohhhh, you are SO BRAVE!" from men :shock:

https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/919755083230973953

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2713
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12671

Post by screwtape »

Steersman wrote: Somewhat amusing or "sardonic" ["bitter irony"] comment from Elam in the first post:
Replicating the feel of human skin, and therefore physical human contact, is an incredibly difficult objective. We are nowhere near the technological advancement required to produce a simple handshake that could pass for human, much less the daunting goal of approximating full, body to body contact complete with full sexual activity.

And that, after all, would seem to be the tipping point. It’s not just inventing a robot that you can fuck. It’s inventing a robot that fucks you. That objective, the punishing demand of the animatronics needed to enable a sex robot to approximate responsive sexual intercourse, is staggering in its difficulty.

And that will be the game changer, especially for blue pill men. As things stand most of them will balk on taking the robotic dive. If they wanted to hump a cold, unresponsive and inanimate lump of artificiality, they’d just get married.
"Blue pill men"? I suppose he means those opposed to red pills, but to me that demographic will always be those older gents who enjoy their Viagra.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12672

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Brive1987 wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
DownThunder wrote:
There's enough morsels in the article to leave a trail, ie the instagram post.

I believe this is a potential match.

https://www.facebook.com/aScienceEnthusiast/

Has over 800,000 followers, their name is associated with the instagram post........ :think:
I don't do Facebook, I am not sure 800,000 followers actually counts for anything. He only has about 3k on Twitter, has no Youtube Channel but does livestreams it seems. He did one with Thomas Smith about a month ago and it only has about 10k views. That isn't much.
Bingo. https://www.facebook.com/TheRealScience ... 9565958708
So there are 2 manginas outed as rapists in the same day?

Barbie's Boyfriend
.
.
Posts: 762
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:29 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12673

Post by Barbie's Boyfriend »

Steersman wrote:
Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:Steersman reminds me of some market advice.

Buy Steersman for what he is actually worth.

Sell him for what he THINKS he is worth
LoL. You might make a lot less than what you apparently think you would.

Besides which, think you're engaging in the same fuzzy thinking - being charitable and not surprisingly - that is exhibited by those who want to criminalize prostitution by referring to women "selling their bodies". How would they get home afterwards? ...
Getting tired of strawmanning me yet?

I have NEVER used the term "Selling their bodies"

My sympathies are with THEM because they hafta deal with manatee like "men" such as YOU.

DownThunder
.
.
Posts: 859
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12674

Post by DownThunder »

Brive1987 wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
DownThunder wrote:
There's enough morsels in the article to leave a trail, ie the instagram post.

I believe this is a potential match.

https://www.facebook.com/aScienceEnthusiast/

Has over 800,000 followers, their name is associated with the instagram post........ :think:
I don't do Facebook, I am not sure 800,000 followers actually counts for anything. He only has about 3k on Twitter, has no Youtube Channel but does livestreams it seems. He did one with Thomas Smith about a month ago and it only has about 10k views. That isn't much.
Bingo. https://www.facebook.com/TheRealScience ... 9565958708
https://www.facebook.com/aScienceEnthus ... 5140418923

Does anyone else feel like social media is just reality tv irl? :twatson:

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12675

Post by VickyCaramel »

Brive1987 wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
DownThunder wrote:
There's enough morsels in the article to leave a trail, ie the instagram post.

I believe this is a potential match.

https://www.facebook.com/aScienceEnthusiast/

Has over 800,000 followers, their name is associated with the instagram post........ :think:
I don't do Facebook, I am not sure 800,000 followers actually counts for anything. He only has about 3k on Twitter, has no Youtube Channel but does livestreams it seems. He did one with Thomas Smith about a month ago and it only has about 10k views. That isn't much.
Bingo. https://www.facebook.com/TheRealScience ... 9565958708
I found the story....
21731331_1808107589217239_4908211583036773874_n.jpg
(196.04 KiB) Downloaded 324 times
Seems this has been going on for a number of years, so why was it ignored for so long? There is definitely another side to the story which we can see in the comments section.

I suspect Dan made two serious mistakes. Firstly he has argued that violence is what religious people do and that it is not okay to punch a Nazi. Secondly, he invited on the people at Mythcon and had a reasonable conversation with them. (Yes, I have been listening to his podcasts). Despite trashing Sargon in his latest podcast (me think he doth protest too much) he isn't flavour of the month with the SJWs. My guess is that now is a convenient time to start listening to SciencePony (who doesn't exactly seem stable, :rimshot: ).


So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12676

Post by Brive1987 »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
So there are 2 manginas outed as rapists in the same day?
Add in PZs new wet dream joker: https://thebaffler.com/latest/new-athei ... rs-nichols

And you have a glory-days 2013 party. This time met with a yawn.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12677

Post by Ape+lust »

I still expect 2018 will be the year the public gets acquainted with the sight of trannies whupping the shit out of women athletes, but it looks like there might be a little pushback first.

https://imgur.com/U2Y6SUR.jpg

https://twitter.com/i/moments/920171109844008960

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12678

Post by Steersman »

VickyCaramel wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: <snip>

I don't do Facebook, I am not sure 800,000 followers actually counts for anything. He only has about 3k on Twitter, has no Youtube Channel but does livestreams it seems. He did one with Thomas Smith about a month ago and it only has about 10k views. That isn't much.
Bingo. https://www.facebook.com/TheRealScience ... 9565958708
I found the story....
21731331_1808107589217239_4908211583036773874_n.jpg
Seems this has been going on for a number of years, so why was it ignored for so long? There is definitely another side to the story which we can see in the comments section. .... My guess is that now is a convenient time to start listening to SciencePony (who doesn't exactly seem stable, :rimshot: ).
:-) Closing the gate after the "horse-sense" has bolted? ....

VickyCaramel wrote:So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?
Ahh, Peyton Place had nothing on "social media" these days ...

Sulman
.
.
Posts: 2057
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:13 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12679

Post by Sulman »

VickyCaramel wrote: So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?
This is what happens when people can see the pitchforks and torches massing.

It's dirty laundry. There is no fucking way there is not more to the story here. You don't send a picture to someone that is creeping you out.

Secondly - and this is a bit of a theme today - when did women get so bloody pathetic?

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12680

Post by Steersman »

Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:
Steersman wrote:
Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:Steersman reminds me of some market advice.

Buy Steersman for what he is actually worth.

Sell him for what he THINKS he is worth
LoL. You might make a lot less than what you apparently think you would.

Besides which, think you're engaging in the same fuzzy thinking - being charitable and not surprisingly - that is exhibited by those who want to criminalize prostitution by referring to women "selling their bodies". How would they get home afterwards? ...
Getting tired of strawmanning me yet?

I have NEVER used the term "Selling their bodies"
Did I say that you did? Just suggesting that your analogy didn't hold much water.
Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:My sympathies are with THEM because they hafta deal with manatee like "men" such as YOU.
LoL. There you go again, thinking that your prejudices - AKA pre-judgments - are something that everybody does or should or must subscribe to. Expect it's an idea that's kind of difficult for you to wrap your pointed head around, but you might consider that there's a great deal of evidence to support the idea that many sexworkers think, as one young lady in the profession told me some years ago, that prostitution was "the best job in the world". Hardly much if any justification for your "hafta deal ..."

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12681

Post by Steersman »

screwtape wrote:
Steersman wrote: Somewhat amusing or "sardonic" ["bitter irony"] comment from Elam in the first post:
....
And that will be the game changer, especially for blue pill men. As things stand most of them will balk on taking the robotic dive. If they wanted to hump a cold, unresponsive and inanimate lump of artificiality, they’d just get married.
"Blue pill men"? I suppose he means those opposed to red pills, but to me that demographic will always be those older gents who enjoy their Viagra.
:-) Le contexte, toujours le contexte ...

Suet Cardigan
.
.
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:26 am
Location: England, a bastion of barbarism and cluelessness

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12682

Post by Suet Cardigan »

Tigzy wrote:I don't get why people keep taking the piss out of Steersman's seduction skills and wit - I bet if you heard him in the original binary, you'd think you were in the presence of a chrome-plated Casanova.
Nude-Woman-with-Robot.jpg
(138.48 KiB) Downloaded 291 times

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12683

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Lsuoma wrote: Would you fuck her with her bloat?
I will not fuck her gunt. I will not fuck her with my blunt. I will not fuck her as a stunt. Ahh, I've run outa rhymes.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12684

Post by CommanderTuvok »

Can you imagine the shock and disgust of a woman who was unlucky enough to receive a dick pic from PZ Myers? One that had tentacles wrapped round it!!!

I was wondering whether PZ was the latest SJW perv, but...

1) We already know he's a fucking pervert.
2) He does not have that many followers.

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12685

Post by VickyCaramel »

Sulman wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?
This is what happens when people can see the pitchforks and torches massing.

It's dirty laundry. There is no fucking way there is not more to the story here. You don't send a picture to someone that is creeping you out.

Secondly - and this is a bit of a theme today - when did women get so bloody pathetic?
When did "no thanks" stop being an option?

In all the comments, there are some real nuggets of "grown up".

When did people who boast about being into science start getting scared by photos of a penis?

These photos might have been unsolicited, but I'm sure replying with "Please don't send me any more" might have helped the situation, especially if you add, "...or I will contact the police".

You cannot get raped via the internet, not even by explicit pictures. If you could, them most of us have been repeatedly gang raped by pop-ups while using Internet Explorer.

As much as I can defend this guy, you have to say that you are fucking idiot if you are sending nudes to married women, especially if they are feminists. It's as if the internet isn't full of sluts taking their clothes off!

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12686

Post by Lsuoma »

Sulman wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?
This is what happens when people can see the pitchforks and torches massing.

It's dirty laundry. There is no fucking way there is not more to the story here. You don't send a picture to someone that is creeping you out.

Secondly - and this is a bit of a theme today - when did women get so bloody pathetic?
So this is getting all Stollznow/Radfordesque. Also Sulkowicz/Nugesseresque. Also, oh, never mind...

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12687

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Seriously what the fuck is wrong with these people?

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12688

Post by free thoughtpolice »

What is "A Science Enthusiast's" name or is that doxing?

DownThunder
.
.
Posts: 859
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12689

Post by DownThunder »

It's Dan Broadbent, it's not a secret, his name and "a science enthusiast" page are publicly connected, and he's addressed the allegations under his own name.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12690

Post by Brive1987 »

free thoughtpolice wrote:What is "A Science Enthusiast's" name or is that doxing?
Ah. Note to self. Free thoughtpolice is a "non clicker"

Sulman
.
.
Posts: 2057
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:13 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12691

Post by Sulman »

A former writer and associate of Miramax weighs in on the Weinstein thing. This is a good read:
http://deadline.com/2017/10/scott-rosen ... 202189525/

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12692

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Brive1987 wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:What is "A Science Enthusiast's" name or is that doxing?
Ah. Note to self. Free thoughtpolice is a "non clicker"
I clicked but didn't see the name. :drool:


Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12694

Post by Lsuoma »

Lsuoma wrote:
Sulman wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: So he sends her unsolicited dick pics and she is so horrified that she sends a pic back... but only because she had a fight with her husband. Who thinks we are getting the full story?
This is what happens when people can see the pitchforks and torches massing.

It's dirty laundry. There is no fucking way there is not more to the story here. You don't send a picture to someone that is creeping you out.

Secondly - and this is a bit of a theme today - when did women get so bloody pathetic?
So this is getting all Stollznow/Radfordesque. Also Sulkowicz/Nugesseresque. Also, oh, never mind...
All this is just a reiteration of DSYDIC.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12695

Post by AndrewV69 »

Tigzy wrote:
Sulman wrote:Sam Kriss has 'fessed up. He is now - how you say? - totally getting flayed.
Sam's take on the matter: https://medium.com/@samkriss/today-an-a ... c1739d85a2

Hmmm. This sheds a little new light on proceedings:
I’d like for a moment to add some conext to the events described, which I hope will make them more explicable if not more excusable. By the time of the night described in the accusation, she and I had, as she mentions, previously met twice and we had an existing sexual relationship. The behaviour she describes was informed by that fact. I wasn’t fully aware of how unwelcome my advances were at that point: we had been messaging intimately and frequently up until then, and I went into the evening thinking it would be a continuation of the relationship we had already established.
I'm no fan of Kriss, but I think it was somewhat disingenuous of his accuser to give the impression that Sam's gropey fumblings came out of nowhere - making him appear more a creep than a clumsy oaf. If what he says is true, of course - that he was already in a sexual relationship with her and that this was only the third time they had ever met; in other words, that she's a bit of a slapper. :lol:

Ah fuckit. Either way, we have two chattering-class Marxists tearing each other to shreds, so it's all for the good.
ANTI-GAMERGATE JOURNALIST FOR VICE, GUARDIAN FIRED FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT

So they had previously met twice and already had a sexual relationship? Translation?

My record was, within 30 mins the clothes were off and shagging commenced. But when we met the second time I did not presume that we had an existing sexual relationship

(I am not boasting BTW. These things happen when you have horny teens and fail to supervise the girls closely).

Someone not in the know would never have guessed that we had fucked. Perhaps things are different today?

Anyway, he apologised. Yuge mistake.

He should have said she gave him the impression that she was just as much as a slut progressive as he was and never once gave any other indication and question her motive for telling such a one sided and slanted story.

That she left out pertinent details, erased her personal responsibility, agency, and complicity and falsely portrayed him as the sole aggressor.

Anyway, I do not have any sympathy for him. He is a cunt. She is a cunt. They deserve each other.
[Update:] Buzzfeed is reporting that after reaching out to Vice for comment about the matter, a source told them that Vice decided to no longer utilize the services of Sam Kriss. He’s effectively relieved from all duties at the online outlet.
Trial by media. Good. Fuck you Sam Kriss. About time you got a taste of your own medicine.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12696

Post by KiwiInOz »

VickyCaramel wrote:snip

It's as if the internet isn't full of sluts taking their clothes off!
And we salute them.

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12697

Post by VickyCaramel »

KiwiInOz wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:snip

It's as if the internet isn't full of sluts taking their clothes off!
And we salute them.
Football fans will be glad to know that you can take a knee and stand to attention at the same time.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12698

Post by free thoughtpolice »

KiwiInOz wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:snip

It's as if the internet isn't full of sluts taking their clothes off!
And we salute them.
Where is that pic of Steve Shives when you need it?

BoxNDox
.
.
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:24 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12699

Post by BoxNDox »

John D wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Ugh. But this brings up a point I would like to ask the dog-loving 'pit; dangerous dog breeds like pitbulls or inbred breeds like pugs-shouldn't they be spayed and neutered out? I'm all for taking care of extant animals, but isn't it cruel to continue breeding them? Pit bulls can be great dogs, but they are also a lot like guns-they only work with responsible owners, and there's no licensing requirement for dangerous dogs. The breeds inbred with health conditions speak for themselves.

I had a bit of an incident today, then I saw another pitbull thing in my Twitter timeline. And before you hate me (more than usual) I'm genuinely asking, not decided.
As a small government type of person I struggle with a solution to the dangerous dog problem. I certainly do think that certain breeds and mixed breeds are much more dangerous than others.
The statistics on this are pretty unequivocal: Pit bulls are the most dangerous, far in excess of their prevalence in the dog population. Rottweilers are usually second, and then you have some mix of German shepherds, Huskies, and Malamutes.

Beyond that it boils down to "size matters". This is also true in who suffers the most dog bit fatalities and injuries: Small children are vastly more at risk.

The problem also begins at home. You're much more likely to get bitten by your own dog.

Some studies also report that intact male dogs are the source of a disproportionate number of attacks. Another reason to spay/neuter.

All that said, the statistics are necessarily incomplete because a lot of dog bites don't get reported. I've been attacked twice and my dog once, none of which were reported. (The dog-on-dog attack was the only serious one - my dog is a small boxer and the attacker was a St. Bernard.)
John D wrote: I am a bit encouraged these days in the US. People who cause injury to others do to their aggressive dogs are finally getting prison sentences. I think this is the right approach. If your dog fucks up someone... or kills someone... you go to prison. Most reasonable people will think twice about keeping a dangerous animal.
I think it's a bit more complex than that, because attack can happen with no prior history or warning. OTOH, when one of our boxers got to be noticeably paranoid and aggressive, we had him put down rather than risk someone getting hurt.
John D wrote:
Regarding pet dogs.... all I can say is that you should look to adopt from your local Humane Society. My mixed Pekingese/Jack Russel Terrier is the best dog EVAR! I never though I could love an animal as much as I do. I think that fact that he has a mix makes him more "normal". He has a lot of personality, but he is not crazy. Good energy when taking walks, but very happy sitting on the couch watching TV for 4 hours.
Humane Society is good, but there are also all kinds of dog rescues out there that deserve a look, especially if you're interested in a specific breed or type of dog.

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6460
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12700

Post by Really? »

PZ said he never harassed anyone, but he forgot "Do your belly dance" and so many of his other greatest hits.

And as for this Dan controversy, I haven't heard of any of these "leading skeptics."

BoxNDox
.
.
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:24 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12701

Post by BoxNDox »

Old_ones wrote: instead of direct democracy, partially so that they can protect a populace against its worst impulses. Big changes like the UK leaving the European Union are supposed to be difficult in such a system. I'm neutral on Brexit, but it wouldn't be "anti-democratic" for MPs to kill it - its their job to make these sorts of decisions for the country and the referendum isn't legally binding. If popular sentiment on Brexit sustains or intensifies then eventually the populace will put representatives in place that will make it happen. Parliament can say "make me" if they want to.
Try living with the California proposition system in general, and Proposition 13 in particular. It will give you a new perspective on the perils of direct democracy.

BoxNDox
.
.
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:24 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12702

Post by BoxNDox »

Barbie's Boyfriend wrote:https://trekmovie.com/2007/09/14/a-good ... -funerals/

You don't suppose that somebody will dig up one of these graves in the future, and some future SJW will say this was proof that Humans worshiped the Klingon God Kayless ?
http://people.virginia.edu/~sfr/enlt214m/mystmotel.jpg
(from Motel of the Mysteries)

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12703

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

Pit bulls can be very friendly, but their jaws and jaw muscles are massive. Any bite will likely be serious. I'd sterilize all of them if possible.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12704

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Pit bulls can be very friendly, but their jaws and jaw muscles are massive. Any bite will likely be serious. I'd sterilize all of them if possible.
Agreed. Them, Staffies, anything bred for combinations of bite power and tenaciousness/aggression (call it what you will). And fuck the whiny cunts who own these things (sorry to our wesbite's inspiration) who will show you endless photos of "little Rosie snuggling with the kids". Well no shit, within a well-disciplined house with the time to train, then yes, these little cunts will learn their place. But just watch the look in their eyes when one of those kids' friends comes round and starts jumping on little Rosie's hairless little two-legged packmate. We're not talking about wiping out a fucking species, just some vicious little shitty members of one.

And now I'm on it, when did fucking huskies start getting bred and shipped out to every fucking soccer mom? You care about dogs? Fuck you, you're selfish cunts who just care about a cute Facebook photo with a pissed-off ball energy with a layer of thick insulation wrapped round it in the middle of Georgia, and who gets about 1/20th of the exercise it wants each day.

Barbie's Boyfriend
.
.
Posts: 762
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:29 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12705

Post by Barbie's Boyfriend »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Pit bulls can be very friendly, but their jaws and jaw muscles are massive. Any bite will likely be serious. I'd sterilize all of them if possible.
Even THIS one:
Tripod 3.jpg
(1.07 MiB) Downloaded 197 times
Yes, I took that pic. Inside my house

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12706

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

I've just realized that "Rosie" in my comment above might be Abbie's dog's name. If so, that was honestly just a subconscious memory popping up, or hopefully if I am wrong then I am now worrying about nothing.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12707

Post by free thoughtpolice »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Pit bulls can be very friendly, but their jaws and jaw muscles are massive. Any bite will likely be serious. I'd sterilize all of them if possible.
Agreed. Them, Staffies, anything bred for combinations of bite power and tenaciousness/aggression (call it what you will). And fuck the whiny cunts who own these things (sorry to our wesbite's inspiration) who will show you endless photos of "little Rosie snuggling with the kids". Well no shit, within a well-disciplined house with the time to train, then yes, these little cunts will learn their place. But just watch the look in their eyes when one of those kids' friends comes round and starts jumping on little Rosie's hairless little two-legged packmate. We're not talking about wiping out a fucking species, just some vicious little shitty members of one.

And now I'm on it, when did fucking huskies start getting bred and shipped out to every fucking soccer mom? You care about dogs? Fuck you, you're selfish cunts who just care about a cute Facebook photo with a pissed-off ball energy with a layer of thick insulation wrapped round it in the middle of Georgia, and who gets about 1/20th of the exercise it wants each day.
Pretty often you hear Husky-mix dogs killing kids in in small communities in Canada, usually in more northerly First Nations communities. The breed is developed as a working dog. Very high energy and able too deal with cold outdoors environment and also aggressive enough to deal with wild predators to some extent.
In a lot of cases they go semi-feral and are tolerated because they discourage bears and other dangerous or nuisance animals.
I suppose the bulk of the ones bred for pets have a lot of that wild instinct bred out of them, but to me they seem a poor choice for a pet.

MacGruberKnows
.
.
Posts: 1768
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12708

Post by MacGruberKnows »

free thoughtpolice wrote: Pretty often you hear Husky-mix dogs killing kids in in small communities in Canada, usually in more northerly First Nations communities. The breed is developed as a working dog. Very high energy and able too deal with cold outdoors environment and also aggressive enough to deal with wild predators to some extent.
In a lot of cases they go semi-feral and are tolerated because they discourage bears and other dangerous or nuisance animals.
I suppose the bulk of the ones bred for pets have a lot of that wild instinct bred out of them, but to me they seem a poor choice for a pet.
My brother in law in the Yukon told me they pack up in the wintertime and are dangerous. Happens because a lot of native indians don't feed their dogs. The locals will hunt a pack and exterminate it. Basically you wait by the dump for them.

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12709

Post by katamari Damassi »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I've just realized that "Rosie" in my comment above might be Abbie's dog's name. If so, that was honestly just a subconscious memory popping up, or hopefully if I am wrong then I am now worrying about nothing.
Abbie's dog is Arnie.

katamari Damassi
.
.
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12710

Post by katamari Damassi »

How is it that I can post, but when I go to change my signature I get a message saying my IP is blocked?

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12711

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

katamari Damassi wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I've just realized that "Rosie" in my comment above might be Abbie's dog's name. If so, that was honestly just a subconscious memory popping up, or hopefully if I am wrong then I am now worrying about nothing.
Abbie's dog is Arnie.
Cool, thanks!

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12712

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »


free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12713

Post by free thoughtpolice »

MacGruberKnows wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: Pretty often you hear Husky-mix dogs killing kids in in small communities in Canada, usually in more northerly First Nations communities. The breed is developed as a working dog. Very high energy and able too deal with cold outdoors environment and also aggressive enough to deal with wild predators to some extent.
In a lot of cases they go semi-feral and are tolerated because they discourage bears and other dangerous or nuisance animals.
I suppose the bulk of the ones bred for pets have a lot of that wild instinct bred out of them, but to me they seem a poor choice for a pet.
My brother in law in the Yukon told me they pack up in the wintertime and are dangerous. Happens because a lot of native indians don't feed their dogs. The locals will hunt a pack and exterminate it. Basically you wait by the dump for them.
I've seen a few of these dogs that have been brought in to a non bush environment straining at the chain to try and kill the suburban wildlife and the neighbor's pets. Once they go wild, you can't practically train it out of, reliably or practically.
I had one that was tied up across the road that saw a deer, broke zir chain and chased him out on to the road where he was hit by a car and fucked up. They dog ran up and grabbed the 120 lb. deer and dragged it off the road while my neighbors I were trying to get the dog to drop it.
Not the sort of animal you want around if you have pets or children nearby.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12714

Post by Lsuoma »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Meyers:

https://i.imgur.com/xHqg5wJ.png
Hahaha! Yes, there are loads of people that can do this. I have made literally thousands of dollars helping people migrate WP stuff. It's actually very easy if you sit down and follow the MANY sites out there with detailed instructions (I don't know why people paid me to do it, but there you go).

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12715

Post by CommanderTuvok »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I've just realized that "Rosie" in my comment above might be Abbie's dog's name. If so, that was honestly just a subconscious memory popping up, or hopefully if I am wrong then I am now worrying about nothing.
C'mon, man. It's ARNIE. And he's the Pit's mascot!

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12716

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

katamari Damassi wrote:How is it that I can post, but when I go to change my signature I get a message saying my IP is blocked?
I blame the Jews.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12717

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Racist or realist? You be the judge.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/17/investi ... index.html
Both is an acceptable answer.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12718

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Seriously what the fuck is wrong with these people?
I dunno, but it's hilarious. But I have to confess I'm going to need one of Brive's charts or a flowchart or trading cards to keep track of SJW pervert Olympics.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12719

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

SJW trading cards would be very cool. Maybe print your own or something.

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: In 2017 Idiocracy is a Documentary

#12720

Post by Sunder »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Coyne spanks TFA:

The Friendly Atheist goes all HuffPo about Muslim Vikings

:popcorn:
I'll be keeping an eye on this page and the original.

Locked