Give Me a Urinal or Give Me Death!

#541

Anders Breivik may have been punched once or twice.

The result wasn't that great.

#542

From the march on science website:

We recognize that many issues about which scientists as a group have largely remained silent -
attacks on black & brown lives, oil pipelines through indigenous lands, sexual harassment and assault,
ADA access in our communities, immigration policy, lack of clean water in several cities across
the country, poverty wages, LGBTQIA rights, and mass shootings are scientific issues.

Isn’t science apolitical?
Yes. The march is non-partisan, but it is absolutely intended to have an impact on policy makers.

So science is apolitical, but poverty wages, LGBT etc rights, and immigration are scientific issues? :doh:

http://www.scientistsmarchonwashington.com/

#543

Caine smacks Trump for talking like a toddler. Then she proudly displays these dacks.

http://i.imgur.com/1EZdVdt.jpg

Meanwhile PZ initiates his slow circling approach to overt clinical madness.

Quite the weekend.

#544

Brive1987 wrote:Caine smacks Trump for talking like a toddler. Then she proudly displays these dacks.

http://i.imgur.com/1EZdVdt.jpg

Meanwhile PZ initiates his slow circling approach to overt clinical madness.

Quite the weekend.

59 years nasty vulva? Too much information, Caine.

Fuck Nazis? Well, to my great shame I wouldn't mind fucking this one:

http://www.radicalpress.com/wp-content/ ... .15-AM.png

#545

Kirbmarc wrote: The SJWs are authoritarians. Authoritarians love to fantasize about killing or maiming the people they hate. However most SJWs are also pussies who wouldn't start a physical confrontation with a wet paper bag. They needed someone to open the floodgates, and they've found it in the person of the guy who punched the nazi. Most of the Hordelets wouldn't dare to say something to Milo, let alone punch him.

Myers isn't a shit stirrer as much as he is a frustrated loser who jumps on communism's bandwagon. He's not hoping for anything concrete, just shouting his half-thought exercises in virtue-signalling. I doubt he knows much about communism or anarchy other than what he's heard in his youth at his uni by some other students who half-read Mao's Red Book.

He's just enjoying his position as king of the small hill of FTB, dreaming about crushing Trump while he grades papers and throws the student newspaper he hates into the trash. If a bloody revolution actually happened he wouldn't even know what to do, he'd feel at loss. He's a shock jock, he needs drama and an enemy, not revolutions.

That sodding punch has LEGITIMISED the bloody far-right goon. Suddenly everyone knows who he is.

Before this fuss Richard Spencer was a nobody; all the bleating makes him sound like he was a CNN anchor or something.

#546

That's kinda high up for a vulva isn't it? How many facelifts has she had?

#547

Brive1987 wrote: http://i.imgur.com/1EZdVdt.jpg

http://howtotattooremoval.com/wp-conten ... tattoo.jpg

http://bleachers.co.uk/retail/image/cac ... 00x400.jpg

#548

cultural appropriation!

#549

DrokkIt wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote: The SJWs are authoritarians. Authoritarians love to fantasize about killing or maiming the people they hate. However most SJWs are also pussies who wouldn't start a physical confrontation with a wet paper bag. They needed someone to open the floodgates, and they've found it in the person of the guy who punched the nazi. Most of the Hordelets wouldn't dare to say something to Milo, let alone punch him.

Myers isn't a shit stirrer as much as he is a frustrated loser who jumps on communism's bandwagon. He's not hoping for anything concrete, just shouting his half-thought exercises in virtue-signalling. I doubt he knows much about communism or anarchy other than what he's heard in his youth at his uni by some other students who half-read Mao's Red Book.

He's just enjoying his position as king of the small hill of FTB, dreaming about crushing Trump while he grades papers and throws the student newspaper he hates into the trash. If a bloody revolution actually happened he wouldn't even know what to do, he'd feel at loss. He's a shock jock, he needs drama and an enemy, not revolutions.

That sodding punch has LEGITIMISED the bloody far-right goon. Suddenly everyone knows who he is.

Before this fuss Richard Spencer was a nobody; all the bleating makes him sound like he was a CNN anchor or something.

The narrative of the left is that Spencer and Bannon belong to the same "alt-right" group, so by punching Spencer they're punching Bannon by proxy, and so punching Trump. SJWs are convinced that Trump is a nazi just like Spencer and that they'll soon be dragged to a concentration camp.

#550

Caine's certainly concerned about the well-being of the white-supremecist govt occupying her people's continent.

#551

Service Dog wrote:The arbitrary tribalisms are still going to take the shape of Dominance Hierarchies, and competition for Secual Selection will assert itself (or else be repressed with bizarre consequences).

Even if the society forms around fishing or stand-up comedy... racial subsets may form.

And how do you deal with some racial groups far-outnumbering others?

People used to look down on the Italians & Irish here in the US. The Germans were not looking so hot during WWII. But eventually their national identities melted into the background and became part of the texture of the US. Cultural events such as St. Patrick's Day & Oktoberfest.

People love Italian food & Guinness.

The Chinese and Japanese are doing well, and their foods are loved.

Indian food has become popular.

If you want to fight it, you need to do the exact opposite of what the SJWs are promoting.

Cultural appropriation is a good thing.

Mexicans and other Hispanics would be doing extremely well if it wasn't for the fact that so many come over illegally and get taken advantage of as cheap labor who cannot complain.

Blacks who choose to do well are. Sports, Jazz, Hip Hop, Rap, Southern cooking. They have left an indelible mark on this country.

[youtube][/youtube]

#552

Kirbmarc wrote: The narrative of the left is that Spencer and Bannon belong to the same "alt-right" group, so by punching Spencer they're punching Bannon by proxy, and so punching Trump. SJWs are convinced that Trump is a nazi just like Spencer and that they'll soon be dragged to a concentration camp.

Well I hope they are happy, cos that guy is now famous thanks to them.

Do people not realise that the violence has gotten in the way of the debate about fascism that they allegedly want to have? It's almost like if they don't go massively overboard about it then they'll have nothing to define themselves against.

#553

Caine is one of those clowns who likes to impress people with her supposedly ruthless nature. She's very dangerous, she'd enjoy murdering for righteous reasons :lol:

http://imgur.com/Pikz1rT.png

But when a few hordelets got tired of putting up with her bossy shit, she swooned into wounded self-pity and actually heard herself break. Pharyngula became a closed chapter, her was name poisoned forever...

http://imgur.com/Hcc8o87.jpg

http://imgur.com/bDBGQFO.jpg

http://imgur.com/QU4Kbot.jpg

10 days later... Caine's miraculous, if muted, return :lol:

http://imgur.com/JCvLrrk.jpg

#554

Shatterface wrote:That's kinda high up for a vulva isn't it? How many facelifts has she had?

Dear gawd :lol: :lol: :lol:

#555

deLurch wrote:People used to look down on the Italians & Irish here in the US. The Germans were not looking so hot during WWII. But eventually their national identities melted into the background and became part of the texture of the US. Cultural events such as St. Patrick's Day & Oktoberfest.

People love Italian food & Guinness.

The Chinese and Japanese are doing well, and their foods are loved.

Indian food has become popular.

If you want to fight it, you need to do the exact opposite of what the SJWs are promoting.

Cultural appropriation is a good thing.

Mexicans and other Hispanics would be doing extremely well if it wasn't for the fact that so many come over illegally and get taken advantage of as cheap labor who cannot complain.

Blacks who choose to do well are. Sports, Jazz, Hip Hop, Rap, Southern cooking. They have left an indelible mark on this country.

[.youtube][/youtube]

Yes. That's why SJWs are actually harming integration by supporting identity politics, by putting up walls between groups.

Also this is why muslims needs to integrate and why the religious attitudes of muslims must change for them to do so. Jews have done well in the US, mostly because with the exception of isolated communities of ultra-religious people who don't wish to convert others (who do well only because of external support, people who leave those communities are often fucked) they're secularized, they don't really take their Holy Books seriously. The expression "cultural jew" make sense, and that's a good thing.

The problems with islam come from the fact that a) islam is a "missionary" religion which is aimed not at propping up isolated communities, but at taking over society and b) it has a built-in safety system that encourages believers to target other believers who don't seem to"do enough" for the establishment of islam. Very pious jews can live in peace and harmony under a non-Jewish government (although they face a lot of issues), very pious muslims simply cannot, the Koran compels you to use various means to take over and force others to submit.

The solution to this is for the vast majority of muslims to gradually secularize, to become at most "cultural muslims" just like jews are cultural jews, to learn not to take the Koran literally or even too seriously. This was starting to happen in the '60s and '70s in Iran or even Afganistan.

American support to MENA theocracies and theocratic movements against the "godless communists" (allying with the gulf countries, financing Suharto, overthrowing Mossadegh, financing the talebans) has reversed this trend, and a series of stupid choices (the lack of any kind of compromise in the Israel-Palestinian wars, the 2003 Iraq war) as well as deliberate policies of the pious theocratic elites and of the muslims who took their books seriously, along with a demographic explosion, have created a situation where almost all attempts at secularization have been crushed and most young muslims are raised in madrassas and in societies where they study only the Koran and learn to take it very damn seriously.

The long-term solution is to gradually secularize muslim-majority countries and muslim communities in the west. The short-term solution is to demand muslims to follow the same rules as everyone else, not to give them any special privileges due to their religion, to keep criticizing, mocking and satirizing islam and to fight all muslim supremacist groups, by keeping tracks of who they are, who funds them, where they come from, etc. and by expelling those preach treasonous, subversive messages. Some kind of immigration reform, through quotas and requirements, is also warranted.

Islam is incompatible with liberal democracy. Individual muslims, taken as individuals, might not be. Time to turn islam into merely a facet of culture, a quirk which isn't taken seriously just like Bill Maher doesn't take judaism seriously.

#556

President Donald Trump to publish weekly list of crimes committed by immigrants

Is this serious?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 46826.html

#557

Malky wrote:President Donald Trump to publish weekly list of crimes committed by immigrants

Is this serious?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 46826.html

Absolutely serious.

However it will be a published list of ILLEGAL immigrants. Not all immigrants.

Trump is trying to do another end run around the dominant mainstream media to make a compelling case to sanctuary cities, counties and states that not handing over convicted criminal immigrants to ICE (US deportation of illegal immigrants government branch), is not in those citizen's best interest.

#558

I might be wrong about the list only being of illegal immigrants. I guess we will have to wait and find out when the list starts getting published.

However Trump's aim is still the same. To place pressure on sanctuary cities to work with ICE in handing over illegal immigrants convicted of crimes.

#559

Suet Cardigan wrote:From the march on science website:

We recognize that many issues about which scientists as a group have largely remained silent -
attacks on black & brown lives, oil pipelines through indigenous lands, sexual harassment and assault,
ADA access in our communities, immigration policy, lack of clean water in several cities across
the country, poverty wages, LGBTQIA rights, and mass shootings are scientific issues.

Isn’t science apolitical?
Yes. The march is non-partisan, but it is absolutely intended to have an impact on policy makers.
So science is apolitical, but poverty wages, LGBT etc rights, and immigration are scientific issues? :doh:

http://www.scientistsmarchonwashington.com/

Their diversity statement is a wonder to behold. Pandering, fallacies, bullshit - it's all there.

#560

DrokkIt wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote: The narrative of the left is that Spencer and Bannon belong to the same "alt-right" group, so by punching Spencer they're punching Bannon by proxy, and so punching Trump. SJWs are convinced that Trump is a nazi just like Spencer and that they'll soon be dragged to a concentration camp.
Well I hope they are happy, cos that guy is now famous thanks to them.

Do people not realise that the violence has gotten in the way of the debate about fascism that they allegedly want to have? It's almost like if they don't go massively overboard about it then they'll have nothing to define themselves against.

Many of them sincerely believe their own bullshit. They see themselves as the last force able to fight nazism. It's easy to understand them if you imagine for a second that they're right and Trump is literally Hitler, Bannon is literally Goebbels and Spencer is literally Julius Streicher.

Many times people fantasize about going back in time and killing Hitler before it was too late. Probably less fantasize about punching Streicher since he's less famous but few would object. Punching Hitler is Captain America's shtick and he's an American icon.

IF you believe that Trump is Hitler and his entourage are nazis and Spencer is a powerful nazi with links to Trump then it makes sense to punch Spencer to try to intimidate it from ever speaking in public again. To the SJWs punching Spencer is the (admittedly lamer and half-assed) equivalent of shooting Hitler in 1933, just after he came to power. Who wouldn't want to stop Hitler before it was too late?

All ideologies and religions or conspiracy theories make sense if you dogmatically accept never to question their assumptions. They only look crazy if you reject their assumptions because there's no evidence for them and the assumptions themselves don't make sense. But if you accept the dogmas everything else is a pretty logical consequence.

One of the SJW dogmas is that the US are a white supremacist country, not too different from Nazi Germany, so Trump is simply white supremacy personified, the horror in human form, and anyone who's even remotely connected to him or endorses racist or "prejudiced" ideas is part of the Trump regime.

Spencer is indeed a white separatist, whose ideas are terrible and very prejudiced, and close to what we might consider a white supremacist. To us living in the real world and not in SJW fantasy land he's one of many morons whose ideas should be ridiculed but whose rights should be respected. He might have feel empowered by Trump's victory, but that's it, he has no power, had little to no name recognition and is in no position to enact his policies.

In the SJW dimension Spencer is a Gruppenführer of the Trump-SS, soon to be in charge of a political machine which aims to send muslims into the ovens, along with LGBT, Latinx, feminists, communists and probably all POCs unless the brave and fearless warriors for Social Justice put a stop to Trump's reign of terror through brave antifascists acts like punches in the face.

#561

Elon Musk gets shit on Twitter for not sufficiently virtue-signalling.

#562

Sounds unfair. But on the flip side Justin Trudeau has just gone full Merkel.

He hasn't learned a thing from Europe's problems. Sorry Canada.

#563

Sulman wrote:Elon Musk gets shit on Twitter for not sufficiently virtue-signalling.

Here's something better -- Wil Wheaton is getting whupped by justice warriors again, and he is pissed off about it :D

https://archive.fo/s7cox

#564

Here's the live thread, it's a little more complete:

#565

Badger3k wrote:
So science is apolitical, but poverty wages, LGBT etc rights, and immigration are scientific issues? :doh:

http://www.scientistsmarchonwashington.com/
Their diversity statement is a wonder to behold. Pandering, fallacies, bullshit - it's all there.

Diversity
We are taking seriously the many important criticisms regarding (lack of) diversity on social media stating that for this march to be meaningful, we must centralize diversity of the march's organizers (both in leadership positions and at all levels of planning), speakers, and issues addressed as a principal objective for the march.

We hear you, we thank you for your criticism. In the March for Science, we are committed to centralizing, highlighting, standing in solidarity with, and acting as accomplices with black, Latinx, API, indigenous, Muslim, Jewish, women, people with disabilities, poor, gay, lesbian, bisexual, queer, trans, non-binary, agender, and intersex scientists and science advocates.

We recognize that many issues about which scientists as a group have largely remained silent - attacks on black & brown lives, oil pipelines through indigenous lands, sexual harassment and assault, ADA access in our communities, immigration policy, lack of clean water in several cities across the country, poverty wages, LGBTQIA rights, and mass shootings are scientific issues.

Science has historically - and generally continues to support discrimination. In order to move forward as a scientific community, we must address and actively work to unlearn our problematic past and present, to make science available to everyone.

Oppression against our most marginalized scientists and science advocates affects one's ability to study our world, conserve our planet, have scientific careers and advance to senior positions, and ultimately to produce good science and scientific communities worth being a part of.

We recognize, too, that recent issues about which many scientists have voiced concern - gag orders for gov't science agencies, funding freezes, & policy changes blocking action on climate change - will differently and disproportionately affect minority scientists, science advocates, and global communities. Addressing this is imperative in understanding how recent issues will affect all of us - and not simply those most privileged among us.

Same march, new hat.

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4059/4407 ... 091a8d.jpg

#566

deLurch wrote:

Sounds unfair. But on the flip side Justin Trudeau has just gone full Merkel.

He hasn't learned a thing from Europe's problems. Sorry Canada.

Where's Steersman? :lol: :lol:

#567

Ape+lust wrote:Caine is one of those clowns who likes to impress people with her supposedly ruthless nature. She's very dangerous, she'd enjoy murdering for righteous reasons :lol:

[youtube][/youtube]

#568

Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.

#569

Malky wrote:President Donald Trump to publish weekly list of crimes committed by immigrants

Is this serious?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 46826.html

Sort of. The truth is that he will be showing their faces on every televisual comp screen in the nation. For about an hour each week. You might want to, you know...sort of shout at them, get rid of your stress, your bad feelings, your hate.

#570

ERV wrote:*bored*

Its no secret I am not a fan of individuals who, despite their scientific training, focus all of their efforts on becoming 'celebrities', rather than being scientists.

We joke about Wu, but why *arent* those vain fuckers running for public office?

What *precisely* is preventing Steven Novella from running for office? What is stopping Phil Plait? Whats 'SciBabe' doing? Hell, what is stopping McCreight from returning to Indiana and trying to improve the situation there? Politics runs in her family, though it would cut into her sitting on her ass and playing computer games time.

Seriously. blahblahblahblahblah All blah no fucking action.

I asked McWrong if she was going into politics. She responded: "neigh". :)

#571

deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.

Do you think it would help with publicity if someone hit him?

#572

Technically yes if uploaded to youtube with a story. Responsibly, I cannot advocate for senseless violence. Personally, I take no issue with Steersman myself (That would require reading a significant chunk of his diatribes to determine if I like him or not).

#573

MarcusAu wrote:
deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.
Do you think it would help with publicity if someone hit him?

[youtube][/youtube]

#574

Kirbmarc wrote:
Many of them sincerely believe their own bullshit. They see themselves as the last force able to fight nazism. It's easy to understand them if you imagine for a second that they're right and Trump is literally Hitler, Bannon is literally Goebbels and Spencer is literally Julius Streicher.

Many times people fantasize about going back in time and killing Hitler before it was too late. Probably less fantasize about punching Streicher since he's less famous but few would object. Punching Hitler is Captain America's shtick and he's an American icon.

IF you believe that Trump is Hitler and his entourage are nazis and Spencer is a powerful nazi with links to Trump then it makes sense to punch Spencer to try to intimidate it from ever speaking in public again. To the SJWs punching Spencer is the (admittedly lamer and half-assed) equivalent of shooting Hitler in 1933, just after he came to power. Who wouldn't want to stop Hitler before it was too late?

All ideologies and religions or conspiracy theories make sense if you dogmatically accept never to question their assumptions. They only look crazy if you reject their assumptions because there's no evidence for them and the assumptions themselves don't make sense. But if you accept the dogmas everything else is a pretty logical consequence.

One of the SJW dogmas is that the US are a white supremacist country, not too different from Nazi Germany, so Trump is simply white supremacy personified, the horror in human form, and anyone who's even remotely connected to him or endorses racist or "prejudiced" ideas is part of the Trump regime.

Spencer is indeed a white separatist, whose ideas are terrible and very prejudiced, and close to what we might consider a white supremacist. To us living in the real world and not in SJW fantasy land he's one of many morons whose ideas should be ridiculed but whose rights should be respected. He might have feel empowered by Trump's victory, but that's it, he has no power, had little to no name recognition and is in no position to enact his policies.

In the SJW dimension Spencer is a Gruppenführer of the Trump-SS, soon to be in charge of a political machine which aims to send muslims into the ovens, along with LGBT, Latinx, feminists, communists and probably all POCs unless the brave and fearless warriors for Social Justice put a stop to Trump's reign of terror through brave antifascists acts like punches in the face.

I've no doubt you are right: people I know (i.e. brits not yanks) are acting super-bought into this notion that Trump is a Nazi, as if National Socialism isn't a specific set of beliefs one can demonstrate are not acted upon by Trump.

This ban on muslims seems to me to a dangerous and particularly stupid idea, but I think it's time for everyone to realise why Trump is doing this, why his supporters care, and avoid these problems. Otherwise we are going to get a long period of rightwing governance all over Europe. It indeed may be too late to avoid this now as people are so utterly committed to these notions.

There is a big anti-Trump march being organised in my City. I don't see what good it's going to do, and I worry that this central premise of Trump's nazidom has a huge appeal outside of SJW people.

#575

Kirbmarc wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Caine is one of those clowns who likes to impress people with her supposedly ruthless nature. She's very dangerous, she'd enjoy murdering for righteous reasons :lol:

Look, now. She gets suckerpunched by skinheads who pop out of gay bars. Special forces training would be a rational solution to that problem.

Naw, just kidding. She's as likely to become a SEAL as Trump is to become...... I'll get back to you.

#576

deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.

Thanks for the vote of confidence, even if it is somewhat of a left-handed compliment. :-) And have definitely been thinking of a blog - had thought, briefly, of throwing my hat into the FTB ring ;-) But kind of on my list of things to do, New Year's resolution, though it does seem to require more time & effort than I can really justify. Part of the reason why I post longer items - as in the Islam & Islamist thread - and provide links to them in tweets.

#577

Somebody's getting high on their celebrity.

http://imgur.com/fyOcXg1.jpg

#578

Ape+lust wrote:
deLurch wrote:

Sounds unfair. But on the flip side Justin Trudeau has just gone full Merkel.

He hasn't learned a thing from Europe's problems. Sorry Canada.
Where's Steersman? :lol: :lol:

:D Someone sent out the bat signal a little earlier:

#579

Kirbmarc wrote:
Many times people fantasize about going back in time and killing Hitler before it was too late. Probably less fantasize about punching Streicher since he's less famous but few would object. Punching Hitler is Captain America's shtick and he's an American icon.

IF you believe that Trump is Hitler and his entourage are nazis and Spencer is a powerful nazi with links to Trump then it makes sense to punch Spencer to try to intimidate it from ever speaking in public again. To the SJWs punching Spencer is the (admittedly lamer and half-assed) equivalent of shooting Hitler in 1933, just after he came to power. Who wouldn't want to stop Hitler before it was too late?

Most people don't realize that there were many attempts made on Hitler's life between 1933 and the famous bomb under the table in 1944. What if one of them succeeded? Who would have taken command of the Third Reich? My money is on Reinhardt Heydrich. If that were the case, the world would be a very different place today and not for the better. Heydrich was utterly ruthless and utterly competent to a degree that Hitler and the rest couldn't even dream of.

#580

Maybe we should send the guy that killed Hitler back in time to kill Hitler at an earlier point.

#581

Ape+lust wrote:Somebody's getting high on their celebrity.

http://imgur.com/fyOcXg1.jpg

Says the mong who thinks X + Y = XX

#582

DrokkIt wrote:This ban on muslims seems to me to a dangerous and particularly stupid idea, but I think it's time for everyone to realise why Trump is doing this, why his supporters care, and avoid these problems. Otherwise we are going to get a long period of rightwing governance all over Europe. It indeed may be too late to avoid this now as people are so utterly committed to these notions.

Why do you think that?
1. It isn't a ban on muslims, so much as it is a temporary ban on specific nations where where there has been shown to be breeding grounds for high levels of violence and terrorism & animosity towards the US. And yes, the ban may be narrowed down just muslims from those countries. Hopefully the ban can be rescinded once a method for doing proper background checks can be put into place to greatly reduce or eliminate future terrorists entering the US, IF that is even possible.
2. This seems highly more preferable to what is occurring in Europe right now.
3. The terrorist want to kill & rape the kafir as it is. Trying to appease them isn't doing any good.

I accept that this will create hard feelings among many Muslims, and may even increase the numbers who hate the US and wish to do the US harm.

#583

Steersman wrote: :D Someone sent out the bat signal a little earlier:

I was a little worried about you. I've got a spare room if you need to make a run for lower 48 :D

#584

Trump is accusing McCain of trying to start WWIII

He'd better stop McCain NOW before he has to pull out the presidential launch codes.

That'd be fantastic.

#585

Right now, Trump has just clarified his extreme vetting stance.

Using a Facebook post promoted via Twitter.

:lol: :lol: :|

#586

Hubby and I are watching our carbs. We're going over what we've eaten today and he says, "I had a wafer at church today, that's probably carbs." I said it was, "unless you believe in transubstantiation, then it's protein." I'm still chuckling to myself over that one.

#587

Steersman wrote:
deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.
Thanks for the vote of confidence, even if it is somewhat of a left-handed compliment. :-) And have definitely been thinking of a blog - had thought, briefly, of throwing my hat into the FTB ring ;-) But kind of on my list of things to do, New Year's resolution, though it does seem to require more time & effort than I can really justify. Part of the reason why I post longer items - as in the Islam & Islamist thread - and provide links to them in tweets.

Here you go. All the time consuming work involved in creating a blog has now been eliminated:
https://www.blogger.com
or
https://wordpress.com/learn-more/?v=blog

The bulk of the effort is in writing the blog posts. And you are already doing that. Nothing prevents you from continuing to hang out here and finding more inspiration for your writing. But a blog may help you find a more receptive audience. Or at least, if you get a sufficiently sized audience, you have a chance of whatever gems you come up with getting passed around.

#588

TheMudbrooker wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote:
Many times people fantasize about going back in time and killing Hitler before it was too late. Probably less fantasize about punching Streicher since he's less famous but few would object. Punching Hitler is Captain America's shtick and he's an American icon.

IF you believe that Trump is Hitler and his entourage are nazis and Spencer is a powerful nazi with links to Trump then it makes sense to punch Spencer to try to intimidate it from ever speaking in public again. To the SJWs punching Spencer is the (admittedly lamer and half-assed) equivalent of shooting Hitler in 1933, just after he came to power. Who wouldn't want to stop Hitler before it was too late?
Most people don't realize that there were many attempts made on Hitler's life between 1933 and the famous bomb under the table in 1944. What if one of them succeeded? Who would have taken command of the Third Reich? My money is on Reinhardt Heydrich. If that were the case, the world would be a very different place today and not for the better. Heydrich was utterly ruthless and utterly competent to a degree that Hitler and the rest couldn't even dream of.

Except that Heydrich was successfully assassinated in 1942, so who would have been next?

#589

Kirbmarc wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote: The SJWs are authoritarians. Authoritarians love to fantasize about killing or maiming the people they hate. However most SJWs are also pussies who wouldn't start a physical confrontation with a wet paper bag. They needed someone to open the floodgates, and they've found it in the person of the guy who punched the nazi. Most of the Hordelets wouldn't dare to say something to Milo, let alone punch him.

Myers isn't a shit stirrer as much as he is a frustrated loser who jumps on communism's bandwagon. He's not hoping for anything concrete, just shouting his half-thought exercises in virtue-signalling. I doubt he knows much about communism or anarchy other than what he's heard in his youth at his uni by some other students who half-read Mao's Red Book.

He's just enjoying his position as king of the small hill of FTB, dreaming about crushing Trump while he grades papers and throws the student newspaper he hates into the trash. If a bloody revolution actually happened he wouldn't even know what to do, he'd feel at loss. He's a shock jock, he needs drama and an enemy, not revolutions.

That sodding punch has LEGITIMISED the bloody far-right goon. Suddenly everyone knows who he is.

Before this fuss Richard Spencer was a nobody; all the bleating makes him sound like he was a CNN anchor or something.
The narrative of the left is that Spencer and Bannon belong to the same "alt-right" group, so by punching Spencer they're punching Bannon by proxy, and so punching Trump. SJWs are convinced that Trump is a nazi just like Spencer and that they'll soon be dragged to a concentration camp.

I am starting to think that may not be a bad idea. :think:

#590

deLurch wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:This ban on muslims seems to me to a dangerous and particularly stupid idea, but I think it's time for everyone to realise why Trump is doing this, why his supporters care, and avoid these problems. Otherwise we are going to get a long period of rightwing governance all over Europe. It indeed may be too late to avoid this now as people are so utterly committed to these notions.
Why do you think that?
1. It isn't a ban on muslims, so much as it is a temporary ban on specific nations where where there has been shown to be breeding grounds for high levels of violence and terrorism & animosity towards the US. And yes, the ban may be narrowed down just muslims from those countries. Hopefully the ban can be rescinded once a method for doing proper background checks can be put into place to greatly reduce or eliminate future terrorists entering the US, IF that is even possible.
2. This seems highly more preferable to what is occurring in Europe right now.
3. The terrorist want to kill & rape the kafir as it is. Trying to appease them isn't doing any good.

I accept that this will create hard feelings among many Muslims, and may even increase the numbers who hate the US and wish to do the US harm.

I'd be okay with it if it included Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

#591

deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.

If by write a book you mean a copypasta collection of his anti-muslim tweets which are essentially the same tweet anyway.

I might post the odd thing here that I've posted elsewhere on the internet if I think it's a good point I'm making. I can count the number of times I've done it on one hand. I usually link to an interesting article or video. But all of these fucking repetitive tweets. Has he run out of cats to kick? Why take it out on us?

#592

Brive1987 wrote:Right now, Trump has just clarified his extreme vetting stance.
Using a Facebook post promoted via Twitter.
:lol: :lol: :|

Whatever Trump says right now is news. With the internet, he has direct unfiltered access to the public. He can bypass the media completely. The media now is a day late & a dollar short. He can frame it however he wants to.

#593

Tigzy wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Somebody's getting high on their celebrity.

http://imgur.com/fyOcXg1.jpg
Says the mong who thinks X + Y = XX

:clap:

I lol'd.

#594

Tigzy wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Somebody's getting high on their celebrity.

http://imgur.com/fyOcXg1.jpg
Says the mong who thinks X + Y = XX

Owww!! :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap:

I hope he realizes that Trump doesn't give two shits about decorum. If he doesn't dial it down, he'll hear cracks about hairy dwarves from the President of the United States. That could put a gal into a pretty deep funk.

#595

katamari Damassi wrote:I'd be okay with it if it included Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Saudi Arabia has all of the oil.
Pakistan has nukes.

Thus the US has an interest in keeping good relations with Saudi Arabia. Hell, with the money Saudi Arabia has, they could probably buy nukes.

And we would want Pakistan to stay stable and out of war. If the current government of Pakistan (as shitty as it is) were to be overthrown, the populace is rather antagonistic towards the US. It would be like letting nuclear armaments out to all of the shitty terrorist groups out there.

#596

deLurch wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:Right now, Trump has just clarified his extreme vetting stance.
Using a Facebook post promoted via Twitter.
:lol: :lol: :|
Whatever Trump says right now is news. With the internet, he has direct unfiltered access to the public. He can bypass the media completely. The media now is a day late & a dollar short. He can frame it however he wants to.

He will be the first world leader to declare war via twitter.

#597

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:And sometimes I don't skip...
However, if you're going to make such untenable accusations as "resident ethnic cleanser" then you might at least have the integrity to, shall we say, put your money where your mouth is?
"Nuke Mecca from orbit"?

Frequently if not always accompanied by "just to be sure", both of which are clear references to the movie Aliens. Hyperbole.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:"Ban all muslims"?

Those sound familiar?

I'll concede that, apparently, the non-pejorative use of "ethnic cleansing" - "the systematic forced removal of ethnic or religious groups from a given territory" - is more or less what I and many others are advocating. But the term also has a pejorative connotation of genocide - which I of course reject. As should have been obvious from my frequent references to the deportations in Greece of Turkish Muslims in 1923, and the deportations of Mexicans from America in the 30s. Not to mention the 14 million Sikhs, Muslims, and Hindus "transferred" in the partition of India.

But those cases seem to give more than a little justification for the concept and the policy: some groups, ethnicities, and religions are like oil and water, and the grief - murder and mayhem - is much reduced by separating them. And as the virtual collapse of civil society in Europe emphasizes. You may wish to re-read that Olympia post on Why We Must Ban Islam:

Islam cannot be reformed, if it was possible, it must have been reformed since 1400 years. Islam cannot be reformed because of internal structure of its theology. Islam theology raised from Quran and hadiths have concrete orders about the daily life of the Muslims, for example the ratio of grab that the Muslim army will take after a war with non-muslims or the permission to enslave women and little girls as spoil of war, or how Muslims must kill homosexuals, apostates, non-muslims, or how Muslims must cut hand of a thief, how Muslims must stone to death a woman for adultery, etc.These orders of Islam having voilence, hatred, terrorism can not be interpreted on a humanistic ground. How can you reform these barbaric verses of Quran?

Rotten to the core; somewhat apropos of which:

Those the type of people you want to let into or stay in your country? Really?

#598

Za-zen wrote:
He will be the first world leader to declare war via twitter.

That might legitimize twitter PTSD.

#599

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Remember that one time I bragged about my grandfather being in a picture with François Truffaut?

Ali and I went to visit my grandmother today, and she gave us this picture as a keepsake:

http://i391.photobucket.com/albums/oo35 ... vuuism.jpg

Yes, that's Jayne Mansfield. The message says "To naughty Willy from Jayne Mansfield". My grandma's explanation is that during a meeting my grandpa (Willy) offered Jayne a seat that turned out to be a very low wicker chair so that everyone could appreciate the view of her panties from afar.

Sexist fucks! Still, super cool memorabilia.

Phil wins by a head. :auto-crash: http://drmoss.ca/Web%20Images/rolling_mansfield.gif

#600

MacGruberKnows wrote:
deLurch wrote:Speaking of Steersman, I think he should write a book. Or maybe a dissertation. Or at least start a blog or youtube channel. The length of his posts are not well suited for forum discussion. Most of what he writes is lost on us. But if he started his own blog he might find an interested audience. And if he happens to write some gems, I am sure they will get passed around.
If by write a book you mean a copypasta collection of his anti-muslim tweets which are essentially the same tweet anyway.

I might post the odd thing here that I've posted elsewhere on the internet if I think it's a good point I'm making. I can count the number of times I've done it on one hand. I usually link to an interesting article or video. But all of these fucking repetitive tweets. Has he run out of cats to kick? Why take it out on us?

:) "Ve haf vays to make you tok!"

But you might consider that it pays to advertise. You might get peeved at seeing the same "advertisement" all the time, but not everyone has seen it or necessarily been receptive to it at the time it first appeared. Repetition tends to pay dividends - much of the educational system is based on it; but some examples:

24,872 "impressions"

28,397 impressions

Five hundred-odd retweets and likes are small potatoes, particularly in comparsion to the thousands that "Godfrey" gets, although it is a bit of a thrill ("You like me! You really like me!"). But I hope it has some positive effect in rallying the troops.