Give Me a Urinal or Give Me Death!

#13261

Scented Nectar wrote:You're basing this on your feelings. You FEEL that it was "reckless and careless", but how do you even know what he cleared and with whom? Why are you assuming that he did not "exercise caution and judgement"? One of his strongest positions is what you just said: "loose lips sink ships". You're assuming that he didn't clear things, plus the whitehouse themselves said everything was already public. Why are you so convinced he revealed things during this meeting other than because the lamestream media gave you this unproven narrative that he's a bumbling idiot who has no clue?

White House officials involved in the meeting said Trump discussed only shared concerns about terrorism.

“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

McMaster reiterated his statement in a subsequent appearance at the White House on Monday and described the Washington Post story as “false,” but did not take any questions.
In their statements, White House officials emphasized that Trump had not discussed specific intelligence sources and methods, rather than addressing whether he had disclosed information drawn from sensitive sources.

The CIA declined to comment, and the NSA did not respond to requests for comment

Are you satisfied with an answer that doesn't really answer to what was written? Don't you think that McMaster should have answered to a few more questions? Because he really didn't address what was alleged, he simply said that Trump didn't discuss sources, methods or miltary operations.

#13262

MarcusAu wrote:Based on the photos above - Beccy seems happy enough (and if not I don't give much of a shit).

I just wish a few more would follow in her footsteps and take the path to obscurity. (Here's looking at you Laci...).

Ah well, what's the family motto: "Puer autem multum eis"

Or something like that.

Of course she's bloody happy.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... uUYyuK5DZb

The question is ... how the fuck is she managing to hold it together without her emotional support dog?

:lol: :lol:

Oh Indy! Did you miss me Indy?

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy ... 04-h300-nc

#13263

Check this out, lock up your daughters. Ladies, form an orderly queue please, etc, etc.

[youtube][/youtube]

The comments are a hoot :lol:

#13264

It's worth being at the top of the page too if you ask me.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that any pipe-laying going on by this lot is subject to a financial transaction. And Rohypnol.

#13265

Kirbmarc wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:You're basing this on your feelings. You FEEL that it was "reckless and careless", but how do you even know what he cleared and with whom? Why are you assuming that he did not "exercise caution and judgement"? One of his strongest positions is what you just said: "loose lips sink ships". You're assuming that he didn't clear things, plus the whitehouse themselves said everything was already public. Why are you so convinced he revealed things during this meeting other than because the lamestream media gave you this unproven narrative that he's a bumbling idiot who has no clue?

White House officials involved in the meeting said Trump discussed only shared concerns about terrorism.

“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”

McMaster reiterated his statement in a subsequent appearance at the White House on Monday and described the Washington Post story as “false,” but did not take any questions.
In their statements, White House officials emphasized that Trump had not discussed specific intelligence sources and methods, rather than addressing whether he had disclosed information drawn from sensitive sources.

The CIA declined to comment, and the NSA did not respond to requests for comment
Are you satisfied with an answer that doesn't really answer to what was written? Don't you think that McMaster should have answered to a few more questions? Because he really didn't address what was alleged, he simply said that Trump didn't discuss sources, methods or miltary operations.

Why should they have to address every detail or cater to a bunch of questions by hostile people who make shit up? I'd have gone a lot further and banned the Compost from any further access to press events, press releases, and anything else they'd normally have access to. Or at least demand they publish a front page full proof-or-retraction. It's really fucked up what the establishment all-left media keep doing to Trump.

#13266

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
CommanderTuvok wrote: BTW, "MS" was accused of rape from one woman, I believe
Alison Smith herself said it wasn't rape, just a case of her going out that night with the intention of getting shitfaced and having a one-night stand, but she couldn't remember the one-night stand because she blacked out. Peez called it rape.
Elyse MoFugly accused Shermer of raping her ear with words.
Scuttlebutt was that Shermer had banged a lot of chicks at conferences.

Wasn't there the intermediate Carrie Poppy, who likely convinced Smith that what Shermer did to her was rape?

#13267

Oglebart wrote:Check this out, lock up your daughters. Ladies, form an orderly queue please, etc, etc.

[youtube][/youtube]

The comments are a hoot :lol:

One of the guys in there has a great youtube channel that I've been following for a few years now. When his topic's interesting, he's one of my favourite youtubers. Does both opinion videos and request videos for his Asshole Consulting advice business. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcjX48 ... qznYU0w3pg

Request - Why are Socialists Passive Aggressive?
[youtube][/youtube]

#13268

feathers wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
CommanderTuvok wrote: BTW, "MS" was accused of rape from one woman, I believe
Alison Smith herself said it wasn't rape, just a case of her going out that night with the intention of getting shitfaced and having a one-night stand, but she couldn't remember the one-night stand because she blacked out. Peez called it rape.
Elyse MoFugly accused Shermer of raping her ear with words.
Scuttlebutt was that Shermer had banged a lot of chicks at conferences.
Wasn't there the intermediate Carrie Poppy, who likely convinced Smith that what Shermer did to her was rape?

If you believe Wagg she used the Rape word the night he scraped her out of the lift.

This was my take way back when.

http://i.imgur.com/lioJwjQ.jpg

Didn't she once post a "hypothetical" on JREF about how bad it would be to get hepatitis from dirty drunk anal sex? Pretty sure that was a "thing"

#13269

But yes, Poppy was her muse in delivering her bowl of fruit up to PZ. After she got the chop from JREF while Shermer rolled on
...

#13270

Feel the bitterness.
https://archive.is/rTxIc

And Wagg/Alison's farewell to JREF
http://wagg.com/wp/2010/10/so-long-jref/

#13271

It says something, I think, that having gatecrashed Wagg's poignant farewell with a "I left too I left too" comment, Alison's existence is then ignored by all subsequent commentators.

:lol: :lol:

#13272

Well Brive - I knew you had an interest in studying history.

#13273

Scented Nectar wrote:
Oglebart wrote:Check this out, lock up your daughters. Ladies, form an orderly queue please, etc, etc.

[youtube.][/youtube]

The comments are a hoot :lol:
One of the guys in there has a great youtube channel that I've been following for a few years now. When his topic's interesting, he's one of my favourite youtubers. Does both opinion videos and request videos for his Asshole Consulting advice business. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcjX48 ... qznYU0w3pg

Request - Why are Socialists Passive Aggressive?
[youtube][/youtube]

I got to the point where he said Virtual Signalling was predominantly on the left...and then gave up.

Is that why Jesus was telling people to pray in private rather than the middle of the street?

Were there too many socialists, communists and leftist giving public displays of devotion, extorting their own goodness and making sure that their place in the social hierarchy was assured?

All things being equal - people are going to find ways to assert their dominance over each other. And make sure that everyone knows their place in the order of things. Virtual signally by whatever name has probably always been with us.

#13274

MarcusAu wrote:Well Brive - I knew you had an interest in studying history.

Indeed. You can see why the first thing he wanted to learn after doing his sceptic timelines was how to commit genocide.

#13275

shoutinghorse wrote:More on the Skeptic Feminist .. This is the same guy who wanted Bearing to "come at me bro"

I dont like his eyeliner, his goth finger-armor, or the words he uses to sound authoritative.

[youtube][/youtube]

#13276

Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.

#13277

MarcusAu wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
Oglebart wrote:Check this out, lock up your daughters. Ladies, form an orderly queue please, etc, etc.

[youtube.][/youtube]

The comments are a hoot :lol:
One of the guys in there has a great youtube channel that I've been following for a few years now. When his topic's interesting, he's one of my favourite youtubers. Does both opinion videos and request videos for his Asshole Consulting advice business. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcjX48 ... qznYU0w3pg

Request - Why are Socialists Passive Aggressive?
[youtube][youtube]
I got to the point where he said Virtual Signalling was predominantly on the left...and then gave up.

Is that why Jesus was telling people to pray in private rather than the middle of the street?

Were there too many socialists, communists and leftist giving public displays of devotion, extorting their own goodness and making sure that their place in the social hierarchy was assured?

All things being equal - people are going to find ways to assert their dominance over each other. And make sure that everyone knows their place in the order of things. Virtual signally by whatever name has probably always been with us.

But virtue signalling IS predominantly on the left these days. Clarey (the guy in the video), is not into the religious right or anything like that - his father was a preacher and he's NOT a fan. He's on the right, but that doesn't mean the old style where everyone is straight-laced and Christian.

#13278

Maybe I overplayed the religious references - but I'm sure that I can come up with a few ways that people on the right (secular or not) indicate their virtue or status in society.

I'm just not feeling up for a lecture (or a sermon) today.

#13279

MarcusAu wrote:Maybe I overplayed the religious references - but I'm sure that I can come up with a few ways that people on the right (secular or not) indicate their virtue or status in society.

I'm just not feeling up for a lecture (or a sermon) today.

Ok, you party-pooper. :)

#13280

So evidently the Skeptic Feminst murder went down something like this:
[youtube][/youtube]

The skuttlebutt is that Aleksandr Kolpakov had planned to give his "poly" amour "Ivy" a ring that night. They ended up getting high on mushrooms. Aleksandr Kolpakov went on a bad paranoid trip. He was skyping with Laura Athena. He thought that "Ivy" had poisoned him. After the skype ended, he shot her many times. It is also been brought up many times that he was a veteran and may have suffered from PTSD.

#13281

MarcusAu wrote:Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.

His red pill moment is more impressive than Laci Green's.

#13282

MarcusAu wrote:Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.

Like "I'm positive I don't like him".

#13283

McMaster is suspected as being the main leaker. More after I watch some video...

#13284

Scented Nectar wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Maybe I overplayed the religious references - but I'm sure that I can come up with a few ways that people on the right (secular or not) indicate their virtue or status in society.

I'm just not feeling up for a lecture (or a sermon) today.
Ok, you party-pooper. :)

Just to clear any confusion it was the vid not you - that I had a problem with.

#13285

Service Dog wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.
His red pill moment is more impressive than Laci Green's.

Heh.

You are such a charming misanthrope.

#13286

Kirbmarc wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
John D wrote: In general the Dems are worse than Trump.... so we could easily do this forever.
I'm still waiting for Trump to even do something stupid. Everyone wants to push that narrative, but there's nothing solid to back it up.
Talking about state secrets in a more or less informal meeting with representatives of a foreign country, without at least having checked what you're going to say with your intelligence agencies, is pretty stupid. If Obama had done it Trump would had turned it into a meme about "Crooked Barry".

I think there's a lot of smoke and still not enough of a fire when it comes to illegal actions, but the threshold for calling something stupid is much lower, and this was a stupid move no matter how you spin it.

If Obama would have done it, no one would have reported on it. The media thought the world of magical Barry and gave him the benefit of the doubt on everything. Also, the MSM was always worried about bashing the "black" president so they went easy on him. The media gets monster hits and clicks for Trump bashing so Trump is automatically evil. Afterall.... Trump is a rich white dood and therefor must be evil.

#13287

feathers wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.
Like "I'm positive I don't like him".

He far surpassed Phil's skill in Pit kills.

#13288

Service Dog wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Oh come on SD - surely you can think of something positive to say about him.
His red pill moment is more impressive than Laci Green's.

Probably should have been more precise. It is a red pill, not a red 'shroom.
https://imgoat.com/uploads/0efdf2ec9b/16811.jpg

#13289

MarcusAu wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Maybe I overplayed the religious references - but I'm sure that I can come up with a few ways that people on the right (secular or not) indicate their virtue or status in society.

I'm just not feeling up for a lecture (or a sermon) today.
Ok, you party-pooper. :)
Just to clear any confusion it was the vid not you - that I had a problem with.

Ok, I'll take you off the "don't talk about politics with" list. :)

#13290

What can I say - I don't like the look of the D'israli chap.

#13291

MarcusAu wrote:Well Brive - I knew you had an interest in studying history.

I had a crossed swords moment with her at JREF. She struck me as a passive aggressive narcissist.

To be fair, Damion knew her reasonable well and begged to differ.

#13292

Brive1987 wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Well Brive - I knew you had an interest in studying history.
I had a crossed swords moment with her at JREF. She struck me as a passive aggressive narcissist.

To be fair, Damion knew her reasonable well and begged to differ.

Well the mystery remains - how she managed to be so successful for so long.

The calibre of the skepticism was perhaps not what it should have been.

#13293

We are talking Alison right? Not Becca. Though neither achieved real success. Alison was the million dollar challenge barrel girl. Becky was a skeptic hero in a James Holmes kind of way.

#13294

I have nothing more on that video I was watching about McMaster being the main leaker. It's just speculation. Same with speculation that he'll be fired soon. Nothing solid.

#13295

John D wrote: If Obama would have done it, no one would have reported on it. The media thought the world of magical Barry and gave him the benefit of the doubt on everything. Also, the MSM was always worried about bashing the "black" president so they went easy on him. The media gets monster hits and clicks for Trump bashing so Trump is automatically evil. Afterall.... Trump is a rich white dood and therefor must be evil.

If only there was some sort of, I don't know, right-leaning media to report on everything from Obama mispronouncing corpsman to what kind of sauce he enjoys on his burgers.

Alas.

#13296

Sunder wrote:
John D wrote: If Obama would have done it, no one would have reported on it. The media thought the world of magical Barry and gave him the benefit of the doubt on everything. Also, the MSM was always worried about bashing the "black" president so they went easy on him. The media gets monster hits and clicks for Trump bashing so Trump is automatically evil. Afterall.... Trump is a rich white dood and therefor must be evil.
If only there was some sort of, I don't know, right-leaning media to report on everything from Obama mispronouncing corpsman to what kind of sauce he enjoys on his burgers.

Alas.

Yeah... point taken. Part of my problem is that all the news sources I used to pay attention to are turning to shit. I actually now find myself turning on fucking "Patriot Radio" and listening to Dennis Prager. WTF? Sometimes he makes more sense than NPR. But really, they are both shit and are just pandering to the vast number of Americans too stupid to figure out the truth.

And, as I have said before. I am all in favor of a government that gets almost nothing done. Activist governments (on the left or right) will only hurt me personally. So... Let the games continue.... and I will get a good laugh out of it!

#13297

Brive1987 wrote:We are talking Alison right? Not Becca. Though neither achieved real success. Alison was the million dollar challenge barrel girl. Becky was a skeptic hero in a James Holmes kind of way.

Yeah, I was confusing A with B.

Perhaps a diagram would help.

#13298

Our stubborn, and not too bright, PM, avoids answering a question 18 times with the same non-answer. Says that he's already answered it and will just keep giving the same answer over and over. Too bad his answer does not actually answer the question. Oh well, double down anyways. Maybe no one will notice.

Justin Trudeau refuses to answer a simple question... 18 TIMES!
[youtube][/youtube]

#13299

Brive1987 wrote:
MarcusAu wrote:Well Brive - I knew you had an interest in studying history.
I had a crossed swords moment with her at JREF. She struck me as a passive aggressive narcissist.

To be fair, Damion knew her reasonable well and begged to differ.

She seemed fairly direct to me, at least on the erstwhile JREF forums.

Speaking of narcissism, though, have you ever met this guy?

[IMG][/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... it2.jpgIMG]

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

#13300

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... trait2.jpg

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

#13301

MarcusAu wrote:Yes well - that's another fine kettle of fish to change bolting horses in mid-stream with, while attempting to close the gate. It may be Hobson's choice, but a stitch in time is a penny earned as the wise fool said to the blind optometrist.

We'll burn that bridge when we cross it.

#13302

feathers wrote: Wasn't there the intermediate Carrie Poppy, who likely convinced Smith that what Shermer did to her was rape?

Yes, but I was just highlighting. Seriously everyone should have this memorized by now.

#13303

Don't you start.

#13304

An exchange regarding the atheist-feminist shooter guy over at FA:

some dumb cat (0 upvotes):

I have a $10 nug here that says the vic refused his advances at least once, and that he has a history of violence.

a reasonable person (23 upvotes):

Not taking that bet. Having defended too many cases like this, you have no clue until you see what the cops dig up. For all we know, she was abusive and he fired in self-defense. Or one caught the other embezzling funds. Or an argument broke out over the NBA playoffs and it got violent. Or the guy was having a bad reaction to prescription medication, was hallucinating, and shot the woman thinking she was a monster.

I defended all of those. The results were Guilty, Guilty of Manslaughter (plea deal), Not Guilty, Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter (plea deal with no prison time, The guy shot his own sister who was coming to check on him. He was already in end stage cancer, and prison was deemed to be cruel in this case.)

So right now, all we have is a dead body and a suspect under arrest.

dumb cat again (still at 0):

And yet there's a demonstrable pattern of DOCUMENTED violent histories for ALL men who go out and kill women.

The cops won't "dig up" anything -- in fact, they'll be burying the truth because this man is one of their own, and can therefore do no wrong.

Pull you head out of your ass, and get a good look at reality.

I guarandamntee that a history of violence and instability WILL come out.

#13305

MacGruberKnows wrote:
AndrewV69 wrote:This looks pretty cool IMO:

PZ be imagining right about now, how many female students - uhmm gonna stop the post right about here.

Looks more like a hexapus to me.

#13306

If we're to #normalizeatheism, the thing to do is to put a bunch of emotionally immature swingers in charge of all the conferences, college student groups, and secular kids camps.

It's either that or making Danielle Muscato our poster child.

#13307

The Sound of Silence Kek parody was flagged as hate speech.

[youtube][/youtube]

#13308

Lsuoma wrote: Looks more like a hexapus to me.

Did we ever discuss the spider here?

http://www.27bslash6.com/overdue.html

#13309

We’re stuck with our bodies, and we have to coexist with them, but that’s often more work for those of us on the feminine end of the spectrum facing tons of conditioning to loathe our bodies if they’re not perfect.

#13310

I give up - was it Queen Victoria?

#13311

Sunder wrote:An exchange regarding the atheist-feminist shooter guy over at FA:

some dumb cat (0 upvotes):
I have a $10 nug here that says the vic refused his advances at least once, and that he has a history of violence.
a reasonable person (23 upvotes):
Not taking that bet. Having defended too many cases like this, you have no clue until you see what the cops dig up. For all we know, she was abusive and he fired in self-defense. Or one caught the other embezzling funds. Or an argument broke out over the NBA playoffs and it got violent. Or the guy was having a bad reaction to prescription medication, was hallucinating, and shot the woman thinking she was a monster.

I defended all of those. The results were Guilty, Guilty of Manslaughter (plea deal), Not Guilty, Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter (plea deal with no prison time, The guy shot his own sister who was coming to check on him. He was already in end stage cancer, and prison was deemed to be cruel in this case.)

So right now, all we have is a dead body and a suspect under arrest.
dumb cat again (still at 0):
And yet there's a demonstrable pattern of DOCUMENTED violent histories for ALL men who go out and kill women.

The cops won't "dig up" anything -- in fact, they'll be burying the truth because this man is one of their own, and can therefore do no wrong.

Pull you head out of your ass, and get a good look at reality.

I guarandamntee that a history of violence and instability WILL come out.

If the cops always bury the truth because of the male conspiracy, how comes a pattern of documented violent history always comes out? :think:

#13312

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
We’re stuck with our bodies, and we have to coexist with them, but that’s often more work for those of us on the feminine end of the spectrum facing tons of conditioning to loathe our bodies if they’re not perfect.

[youtube][/youtube]

#13313

Sunder wrote:An exchange regarding the atheist-feminist shooter guy over at FA:

some dumb cat (0 upvotes):
I have a $10 nug here that says the vic refused his advances at least once, and that he has a history of violence.

wmdkitty couldn't make $10 on a dock full of syphilitic sailors.

#13314

Openly back Hamas, Hezbollah, IRA, Black Lives Matter, Stalinism & AntiFa, but don't you dare share tweet jokes about Muslims or Women if you want to become an MP.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3569001/u ... d-muslims/

#13315

Shatterface wrote:
wmdkitty couldn't make $10 on a dock full of syphilitic sailors.

http://i.imgur.com/Muq22dy.png

Bravo, sir. :lol: :clap:

#13316

shoutinghorse wrote:Openly back Hamas, Hezbollah, IRA, Black Lives Matter, Stalinism & AntiFa, but don't you dare share tweet jokes about Muslims or Women if you want to become an MP.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3569001/u ... d-muslims/

Those jokes are actually pretty funny. They don't seem to incite hatred or be propaganda. I've heard far worse stuff being said about the Scots or the Irish or the Welsh when I lived in the UK. I expected far worse from a UKIP MP to cause "scandal".

Then again it's the Sun, a third-rate clickbait rag.

#13317

MarcusAu wrote:Don't you start.

Don't count all your chickens in one basket, Marcus.

#13318

Brive1987 wrote:We are talking Alison right? Not Becca. Though neither achieved real success. Alison was the million dollar challenge barrel girl. Becky was a skeptic hero in a James Holmes kind of way.

James Holmes?

#13319

jet_lagg wrote:
Shatterface wrote:
wmdkitty couldn't make $10 on a dock full of syphilitic sailors.
http://i.imgur.com/Muq22dy.png

Bravo, sir. :lol: :clap:

I'll share my link if you share yours.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/foxyfolklo ... ving-body/

#13320

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Don't count all your chickens in one basket, Marcus.

I think this sort of counts

Mao Ze Dong wrote: A year ago we were standing at the edge of a precipice. Since then we have taken a large step forward.