deLurch wrote:So I visit voat on a regular basis. A significant downside to voat is that there is a fair amount of overt racism that is so consistent, serious and regular that it would make Steersman proud.
But I have a huge suspicion. I suspect that many of the people that are complaining about (((them))), the (((jews))) and how (((they))) control everything about our world making it worse for everyone, are also the same people who laugh at "niggers" for blaming the white man for all of their whoahs.
So if you ever run across anyone complaining about (((jews))), see if you can side track them into a discussion about the latest example of a "nigger" blaming whitey for all their problems. Then point out that they blame the (((jews))) for everything. So what makes them any better than their "niggers." From my point of view, the white nationalists/separatists/nazis are the (((jew's))) "niggers."
It's all retarded anyway. Instead of blaming ethnic groups people should focus on those who really get special privileges: corporate cronies. They can be jews, white, blacks, gay, straight, women, men, or transgender, but if they're rich and powerful, they have the one and only real privilege. At the end of the day money and connections are the only thing that influential people care about, everything else is a smokescreen for useful idiots.
Of course this can't be changed through the establishment of an authoritarian regime, which is merely a change in terms of elite, and anarchy/lack of hierarchy doesn't work. So what should people do? In part they need to accept that completely equality of outcome, or even "absolute fairness" with no special advantages due to money and/or connections and relationships, is a pipe dream. In part they need to work towards raising the standard living conditions of those who aren't privileged to a certain standard, where people can work and support themselves, have water, electricity, decent food, decent healthcare, decent job perspectives for their children, decent legal support in case they need it, and a legal and educational system focused on improving the life of the citizens, not on trying to win unwinnable "wars on drugs" or on making money for a few monopolists.
In order to do so you need to put limits to the power of corporate cronies who can corner a market through their connections and raise prices arbitrarily, limit the presence of corporations in politics, in the justice system, in education, etc. You don't need to destroy a free market to do this, you need to save the free market from those who, thanks to the size of their business or to their cronies within the system, can operate without ever being controlled or punished by the forces of the markets or by some others.
You don't need communism, you don't even need "socialism". You need a New(er) Deal, a series of anti-trust laws, of government initiatives that create jobs and elevate the standards of living to a decent minimum for everyone, or at least for the largest part of the population, and more and better protection of the individual rights of the citizens when they face the justice system.
Everything else is justice identity politics that people with a limited vision believe to while people who are better at gaming the system use to profit.