Brive1987 wrote:I voted for Trump because he was the alternative to letting a collection of free spenders, organisers, race baiters, intellectuals, tree huggers and professional value arbitrators continue to spend our grandchildren's money.
This country and this generation of voters must pay our bills and not sit around having dorm-room debates on philosophy and injustice. I voted for Trump because we can't afford another president we simply like; we need one who does something.
So, go ahead - rage, riot, demonstrate, burn, dress up, march, protest, pout, sing, make speeches, resist, vandalise and denounce me as much as you want.
I am deplorable, and I am happier with my vote every day.
:think:
Let me try to help you figure that one out and clarify. Jeff Bust does not appear to have a college education. And while his ability to clearly communicate his thoughts for major publications is in question, I suspect he still knows what matters to him.
> free spenders
Democrats have always had a reputation for spending money we don't have. That is until G.W.Bush took over and blew the budgets way out of proportion mostly due to military war time spending. Most working class people who get their act together knows that taking on debt, especially lots of debt sacrifices tomorrows budgetary dollars for today's free living. Looking at their credit card statements, many have probably learned a lesson or two about how interest eats into your future. The only way out is to suck it up. Get a budget. And start paying down your debt. If they can do it, they sure as hell can't figure out why all the smart people in Washington can't suck it up a do what the working class has done themselves. Yes, the US has a debt problem. It is a major elephant in the room. And Trump may be the better option as he really isn't "Republican" or "Democrat." See: usdebtclock.org or Greece.
> organisers
I think he means Union Organizers. In the US, in many states, if you are hired for a job, you may be required to join the union and have your wages garnished. Local unions can do some great things for the worker, such has fighting for pay raises, making sure people are not fired without just cause, health, safety & good working conditions. But they can also have negative qualities. Unions at the national level tend to be corrupt, sucking in the money of the laborers without providing benefit (when local unions as for help they are often told that it is up to themselves), protecting the lazy worker, preventing the highly competent hard working skilled worker from getting raises, keeping dangerous people on the job, sacrificing the worker's health and safety to keep jobs. The control of information at the national level a power play intended to keep those in power.
> race baiters
Self explanatory I think. But strongly associated with the "Left" and democrats.
> intellectuals
Yeah, this guy is showing his working class roots. But all of the college education democrats have been scoffing at the stupid, uneducated working class folk. He has resentment for a reason. On one said, just because he doesn't have a college education doesn't mean he can't understand what his best interests are. And those are the same "intellectuals" trying to tell him that gender doesn't exist, there are more than two genders, and you can pick whichever one you want to identify as. Or hell just look at all of the insanity from the SJWs, and the stuff we laugh about here on a regular basis. The self proclaimed smart people have clearly lost their minds.
> tree huggers
Kind of gets used as a blanket term here in the US. People trying to stop logging. Preventing people from collecting rain water. PETA. Greenpeace. Earth Liberation Front radicals. Anti-GMO. Anti-Dakota pipeline protesters. Most have good intentions. But some go way too far, and don't think about issues and solutions on a practical scale.
> professional value arbitrators
Not sure about this one. Could mean professional mediators written into contract law.
https://americanbar.org/content/newslet ... enADR.html
Or he could mean politicans.
Or he could mean SJWs of the more professional level (editorialists) who try to dictate what should or should not be morals right think.
So although this guy doesn't have a college education, and can't communicate well, as in:
https://i.imgur.com/OFQ4JBb.jpg
He still knows that the politicians we have been voting in for a long time have not be representing his interests, or taking care of some of their core responsibilities.
