Re: The Refuge of the Toads
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:00 am
Anyone else get a feeling of inpending doom?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: A good bike for a beginner, light and playful when needs be.
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
Anyone else get a feeling of inpending doom?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: A good bike for a beginner, light and playful when needs be.
http://i.imgur.com/FMSzrMR.jpgrayshul wrote:WITNESS ME
YES THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING THE JOKE IN METICULOUS DETAIL, STEERS. WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT YOU.Steersman wrote:Wikipedia:Kind of ironic that Miller is throwing stones at Manning when far more people died as a result, in part, of Miller's too hasty peddling of a hoax or fakenews created, intentionally or not, by the "Intelligence" Community.Miller became embroiled in controversy after her coverage of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) program both before and after the 2003 invasion was discovered to have been based on the inaccurate information in the intelligence investigations,[1] particularly those stories that were based on sourcing from the now-disgraced Ahmed Chalabi.[2][3] The New York Times later determined that a number of stories she had written for the paper were inaccurate. ...
This time I really needed him man...feathers wrote:YES THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING THE JOKE IN METICULOUS DETAIL, STEERS. WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT YOU.Steersman wrote:Wikipedia:Kind of ironic that Miller is throwing stones at Manning when far more people died as a result, in part, of Miller's too hasty peddling of a hoax or fakenews created, intentionally or not, by the "Intelligence" Community.Miller became embroiled in controversy after her coverage of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) program both before and after the 2003 invasion was discovered to have been based on the inaccurate information in the intelligence investigations,[1] particularly those stories that were based on sourcing from the now-disgraced Ahmed Chalabi.[2][3] The New York Times later determined that a number of stories she had written for the paper were inaccurate. ...
I'm certain Steers can explain it.rayshul wrote:Happy birthday Brive
I don't get the Judith Miller joke. -.-
https://i.imgur.com/9Zg3Rrf.jpgGuest_935516df wrote:Maybe this is what she is looking for?
https://i.imgur.com/9Zg3Rrf.jpg
-Soylent
Well sure, the link to Ms Miller's WP is welcome, but there's absolutely no need to explicate why it is so ironic.rayshul wrote:This time I really needed him man...
Long ago, National Lampoon put out a 1964 high school yearbook parody. I remember a picture of a twerp with a listing of clubs he belonged to. One of them was the Future Veterans of Foreign Wars.Brive1987 wrote:For when you look up "virtue signalling" in the dictionary.
http://i.imgur.com/5VNLfLW.jpg
She is lucky her parents apparently didn't have the option.
I'm drunk feathers and I need things explained very slowly to me with small words.feathers wrote:Well sure, the link to Ms Miller's WP is welcome, but there's absolutely no need to explicate why it is so ironic.rayshul wrote:This time I really needed him man...
Thanks. Dude needed a bucket of cold water to settle him down.Guest_935516df wrote:3rd attempt on trying to find the most pro-abortion T-shirt Watson could wear.
https://i.imgur.com/00Xcs3n.jpg
-Soylent
My pleasure; happy to be of service, m'am. :-)rayshul wrote:I'm drunk feathers and I need things explained very slowly to me with small words.feathers wrote:Well sure, the link to Ms Miller's WP is welcome, but there's absolutely no need to explicate why it is so ironic.rayshul wrote:This time I really needed him man...
I feel like you'd be great as the sober companion to a group of drunks, actually.Steersman wrote:I thought that you might have missed my earlier comments, or that - horror of horrors! - you had me on ignore. But that it was worth the effort to sally forth, "once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more". So to speak. I find it rather amazing, the extent to which the key to understanding something can be an apparently trivial detail - like the primer in Contact, or the Rosetta Stone - and that repetition, particularly with rephrasing, frequently pays dividends.
:obscene-drinkingcheers:
Is that when you swallow a burp and fart at the same time?Snapfingers wrote:Anyone else get a feeling of inpending doom?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: A good bike for a beginner, light and playful when needs be.
Or he could be the reason you started drinking in the first place.rayshul wrote:I feel like you'd be great as the sober companion to a group of drunks, actually.
HEE! :clap: :clap:Brive1987 wrote:Thanks. Dude needed a bucket of cold water to settle him down.
http://i.imgur.com/btBVZDg.jpg
I think this is a true point but I'm not sure because - drunkfeathers wrote:Or he could be the reason you started drinking in the first place.rayshul wrote:I feel like you'd be great as the sober companion to a group of drunks, actually.
I see the light - the scales have fallen from my eyes.Steersman wrote:My pleasure; happy to be of service, m'am. :-)rayshul wrote:
I'm drunk feathers and I need things explained very slowly to me with small words.
I thought that you might have missed my earlier comments, or that - horror of horrors! - you had me on ignore. But that it was worth the effort to sally forth, "once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more". So to speak. I find it rather amazing, the extent to which the key to understanding something can be an apparently trivial detail - like the primer in Contact, or the Rosetta Stone - and that repetition, particularly with rephrasing, frequently pays dividends.
:obscene-drinkingcheers:
I think Rebecca has you blocked. I don't see it unless I look at your twitter feed directly.Brive1987 wrote:Thanks. Dude needed a bucket of cold water to settle him down.
Oh Rebecca killed me Toni's ago. In fact sometime last year Stollie finally got around to blocking me despite the fact I only followed her and never tweeted at her.deLurch wrote:I think Rebecca has you blocked. I don't see it unless I look at your twitter feed directly.Brive1987 wrote:Thanks. Dude needed a bucket of cold water to settle him down.
"Isn't it more important to fight Trump using our proven failing tactics rather than spend time on useless things like reforming our side to get rid of internally divisive and unproductive issues and develop new tactics that could actually work?"Ape+lust wrote:Ophelia's gotten wind of that outlier event coming up at Portland CFI. I guess the sting of being the witch in the hunt is wearing off, she's starting to bend back into Justice Warrior shape.
http://imgur.com/MgZZTf0.jpg
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/201 ... rrectness/
Sorry. I could've warned you.Brive1987 wrote:"The Girl on the Train"
Give me back my last two days of leisure reading.
What a piece of shit. It needed a trigger warning.
Fuck fuck fuck.
yanksBrive1987 wrote:How did "yonks" get changed to the nonsense "toni's"? WTF?
I think the joke is probably her 2nd achievement from Wikipedia:Steersman wrote:Wikipedia:KiwiInOz wrote:I don't get it, either.Lsuoma wrote: Can someone explain?
Oh, and happy birthday, Brive. Wifey and I are having a 50th year long celebration, because one day is far too short.Kind of ironic that Miller is throwing stones at Manning when far more people died as a result, in part, of Miller's too hasty peddling of a hoax or fakenews created, intentionally or not, by the "Intelligence" Community.Miller became embroiled in controversy after her coverage of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) program both before and after the 2003 invasion was discovered to have been based on the inaccurate information in the intelligence investigations,[1] particularly those stories that were based on sourcing from the now-disgraced Ahmed Chalabi.[2][3] The New York Times later determined that a number of stories she had written for the paper were inaccurate. ...
Miller was later involved in the Plame Affair, in which the status of Valerie Plame as a member of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) became widely known. When asked to name her sources, Miller invoked reporter's privilege and refused to reveal her sources in the Central Intelligence Agency leak and spent 85 days in jail protecting her source, Scooter Libby. Miller later was forced to resign from her job at the New York Times in November 2005. Later, she was a contributor to the Fox News Channel and a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute. On December 29, 2010, numerous media outlets reported that she had signed on as a contributing writer to the conservative magazine Newsmax.
Ape+lust wrote:Ophelia's gotten wind of that outlier event coming up at Portland CFI. I guess the sting of being the witch in the hunt is wearing off, she's starting to bend back into Justice Warrior shape.
[.img]http://imgur.com/MgZZTf0.jpg[/img]
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/201 ... rrectness/
So we should give SJWs a free pass because Trump becomes president?The Witch of the Web wrote:Yes, there are plenty of silly people on the left, as there always are. Yes, many of them get too worked up about things that aren’t all that important. No, the best people to talk about such things are not Christina Hoff Sommers and Peter Boghossian.
Also, don’t worries about college students demanding trigger warnings seem a little less urgent now as Donald “I hate political correctness” Trump slithers into the White House?
SJWs are part of the reason Trump is in the whitehouse. This is the time to stick the boot in.feathers wrote:Ape+lust wrote:Ophelia's gotten wind of that outlier event coming up at Portland CFI. I guess the sting of being the witch in the hunt is wearing off, she's starting to bend back into Justice Warrior shape.
[.img]http://imgur.com/MgZZTf0.jpg[/img]
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/201 ... rrectness/So we should give SJWs a free pass because Trump becomes president?The Witch of the Web wrote:Yes, there are plenty of silly people on the left, as there always are. Yes, many of them get too worked up about things that aren’t all that important. No, the best people to talk about such things are not Christina Hoff Sommers and Peter Boghossian.
Also, don’t worries about college students demanding trigger warnings seem a little less urgent now as Donald “I hate political correctness” Trump slithers into the White House?
Should we also pardon all forthcoming PETA actions because of Trump? People parking their car in a handicap place?
The name of the central character, Rachel Watson, was a bit unsettling for me.Brive1987 wrote:"The Girl on the Train"
Give me back my last two days of leisure reading.
What a piece of shit. It needed a trigger warning.
Fuck fuck fuck.
Condolences Pitch.Pitchguest wrote:Cancer claims its latest victim. My uncle. RIP. :(
MEDIOCRE!rayshul wrote:WITNESS ME
I've had 400kms on the bike so far, on most types of road (country, mountain, highway, speedway, city street, Monaco...) and am not dead yet. In my defense, my driving style is a mix of grandma and Steers. Careful at every moment, and stuck at an almost robotic level of adhesion to the speed limits.Snapfingers wrote:Anyone else get a feeling of inpending doom?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: A good bike for a beginner, light and playful when needs be.
Sorry to hear that, Pitch. Cancer is one hell of a bitch. All my sympathies.Pitchguest wrote:Cancer claims its latest victim. My uncle. RIP. :(
So sorry. Was this your dad's brother?Pitchguest wrote:Cancer claims its latest victim. My uncle. RIP. :(
Ah, I spent toni's trying to figure out what you meant...Brive1987 wrote:How did "yonks" get changed to the nonsense "toni's"? WTF?
Christ.
I'm Brianna Wu. Putting on some hose & heels to take the sportbike out for a meatspin.
Did your copy identify as male or female?katamari Damassi wrote:Just finished The Book of Strange New Things by Michael Faber-you might know him from Under The Skin.
It's the story of a christian missionary on an alien planet. I recommend it. The story didn't go any of the ways I expected it to.
Slightly related topic; pretty much all of the sci-fi I've read assumes that advanced civilizations will be atheistic or at least secular, but what if we encounter an advanced species evangelical with a religion incomprehensible-or just plain silly-to us?
You mean, Americans?katamari Damassi wrote:Slightly related topic; pretty much all of the sci-fi I've read assumes that advanced civilizations will be atheistic or at least secular, but what if we encounter an advanced species evangelical with a religion incomprehensible-or just plain silly-to us?
She kept her horrifying visage out of the ad. That was smart. Why bring up gamer gate though? Does she think the people in her district know/care about something so inconsequential to their lives?Service Dog wrote:I'm Brianna Wu. Putting on some hose & heels to take the sportbike out for a meatspin.
I chuckled.feathers wrote:Hello? It wasn't that funny...
condolences - but be glad it was not drawn out, this can be terrible for both the one who dies and the familyPitchguest wrote:Cancer claims its latest victim. My uncle. RIP. :(