Those tweets don't have anything to do with each other, they've just been posted consecutively.NoGodsEver wrote:What is Watson talking about here? Anyone know?Brive1987 wrote:Coincidence? I think not.
PZ gets a little extra dribble from his spank-wank.
http://i.imgur.com/2ngYUid.jpg
Lucasfilm announced they will not CGI Carrie Fisher. Coincidence?SkepticalCat wrote:The Clintons announced well before the election that CGI would be shut down:Spike13 wrote:Anyone have any info. On the Clinton foundation shuttering the Clinton Global Initiative?
Doesn't look like the story has been picked up by too many outlets.
Apparently the Clinton foundation published a WARN realease to announce lay offs for CGI.
Supposedly this was announced in -house back in Sept. ( whether this is BS or not has not been confirmed)
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/arti ... e-worn-off
Amy Schumer's rapist best friend? WTF?!Ape+lust wrote:Those tweets don't have anything to do with each other, they've just been posted consecutively.NoGodsEver wrote:What is Watson talking about here? Anyone know?Brive1987 wrote:Coincidence? I think not.
PZ gets a little extra dribble from his spank-wank.
http://i.imgur.com/2ngYUid.jpg
Here's the tweet she's actually responding to:
http://imgur.com/jqosIkw.jpg
I find it incredibly funny that they have to open the column with this line:Old_ones wrote:Never mind. Apparently she is friends with some comedian called Kurt Metzger who pissed SJWs off by standing up for someone accused of rape. If you want to read the dumbest thing you'll read all day, here is a daily beast article about it.
Amy Schumer Defends Rape Bro-pologist Kurt Metzger: ‘He’s Not Bill Cosby’
The name of the column is 'not helping', if the title alone wasn't enough for you.
Also they're smearing Metzger with guilt by association, and Schumer with guilt by association by association (association squared?). How long before anyone who's ever spoken positively of anyone who doesn't think that accusations are evidence is called out for "not helping"?Contrary to what Taylor Swift might think, feminists don’t actually enjoy criticizing other women.
If Kevin Bacon is ever accused or rape we are ALL guilty by association.Kirbmarc wrote:Also they're smearing Metzger with guilt by association, and Schumer with guilt by association by association (association squared?). How long before anyone who's ever spoken positively of anyone who doesn't think that accusations are evidence is called out for "not helping"?
With some of the rhetoric the SJWs are coming up with, it wouldn't completely surprise me.deLurch wrote:Why do I get the feeling that Trump isn't going to survive 24 hours past the Inauguration without at least one shooting attempt on his life.
Six degrees of rape apology.Kirbmarc wrote:I find it incredibly funny that they have to open the column with this line:Old_ones wrote:Never mind. Apparently she is friends with some comedian called Kurt Metzger who pissed SJWs off by standing up for someone accused of rape. If you want to read the dumbest thing you'll read all day, here is a daily beast article about it.
Amy Schumer Defends Rape Bro-pologist Kurt Metzger: ‘He’s Not Bill Cosby’
The name of the column is 'not helping', if the title alone wasn't enough for you.
Also they're smearing Metzger with guilt by association, and Schumer with guilt by association by association (association squared?). How long before anyone who's ever spoken positively of anyone who doesn't think that accusations are evidence is called out for "not helping"?Contrary to what Taylor Swift might think, feminists don’t actually enjoy criticizing other women.
You should try this one:katamari Damassi wrote:Laughter is the best medicine FT.
[.youtube][/youtube]
Ding DONG!Easy J wrote:It did occur to me, but I felt that the more senior Pitters had first dibs. For me, admiring a woman is an enormous turn-on. Competence is erotic. And sharing sexual experiences with incredible women like her is so what I want out of life. She fairly radiates agency.NoGodsEver wrote:The Pit is losing a step. All the talk about Tulsi Gabbard and no mention that she's also highly doable? For shame.
Because everybody loves bacon?Shatterface wrote:If Kevin Bacon is ever accused or rape we are ALL guilty by association.
You magnificent bastard, that's a Carrier quote from the Heina emails! I just noticed it. Bravo. :clap:Easy J wrote:It did occur to me, but I felt that the more senior Pitters had first dibs. For me, admiring a woman is an enormous turn-on. Competence is erotic. And sharing sexual experiences with incredible women like her is so what I want out of life. She fairly radiates agency.NoGodsEver wrote:The Pit is losing a step. All the talk about Tulsi Gabbard and no mention that she's also highly doable? For shame.
Because we're all been in something with some whose in something with someone who...feathers wrote:Because everybody loves bacon?Shatterface wrote:If Kevin Bacon is ever accused or rape we are ALL guilty by association.
A nice bowl of chicken soup and this gem?feathers wrote:You should try this one:katamari Damassi wrote:Laughter is the best medicine FT.
[.youtube][/youtube]
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... sCover.jpg
...knowing it's real.
Goddamn Easy, do you have an archive with quotes for later perusal, or just the memory of a bald elephant?Kirbmarc wrote:You magnificent bastard, that's a Carrier quote from the Heina emails! I just noticed it. Bravo. :clap:Easy J wrote:It did occur to me, but I felt that the more senior Pitters had first dibs. For me, admiring a woman is an enormous turn-on. Competence is erotic. And sharing sexual experiences with incredible women like her is so what I want out of life. She fairly radiates agency.NoGodsEver wrote:The Pit is losing a step. All the talk about Tulsi Gabbard and no mention that she's also highly doable? For shame.
[youtube][/youtube]Hunt wrote:I actually know of (not know) a woman who attempted suicide because of Trump's election. I think what's going on here is there are always a set of people who are on the brink of one kind of breakdown or another. Any event they consider traumatic will push a subset of the set over the edge. This really hit me in California once in the aftermath of an earthquake. I kept hearing about people having breakdowns. These weren't people whose houses got destroyed or who were in bridge or building collapses. They were just people who, for whatever reason, interpreted the event as personal persecution and as their world falling apart.Brive1987 wrote:Had to make the obvious rhetorical point.
[bimg]http://i.imgur.com/AE76I88.jpg[/bimg]
I think it's like a lawsuit - where you want to go for the deepest pockets you can justify. If I'm hurt in an accident with a semi, I'll sue the semi driver for sure, but maybe also the company that employs him, because I might be able to drag them into it with some tort law justification (negligent hiring maybe?) and more to the point, they actually have the money to pay my hospital bills.Kirbmarc wrote:I find it incredibly funny that they have to open the column with this line:Old_ones wrote:Never mind. Apparently she is friends with some comedian called Kurt Metzger who pissed SJWs off by standing up for someone accused of rape. If you want to read the dumbest thing you'll read all day, here is a daily beast article about it.
Amy Schumer Defends Rape Bro-pologist Kurt Metzger: ‘He’s Not Bill Cosby’
The name of the column is 'not helping', if the title alone wasn't enough for you.
Also they're smearing Metzger with guilt by association, and Schumer with guilt by association by association (association squared?). How long before anyone who's ever spoken positively of anyone who doesn't think that accusations are evidence is called out for "not helping"?Contrary to what Taylor Swift might think, feminists don’t actually enjoy criticizing other women.
:dance: :dance: :dance:Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
feathers wrote:Goddamn Easy, do you have an archive with quotes for later perusal, or just the memory of a bald elephant?Kirbmarc wrote:You magnificent bastard, that's a Carrier quote from the Heina emails! I just noticed it. Bravo. :clap:Easy J wrote:It did occur to me, but I felt that the more senior Pitters had first dibs. For me, admiring a woman is an enormous turn-on. Competence is erotic. And sharing sexual experiences with incredible women like her is so what I want out of life. She fairly radiates agency.
Thx. This whole week and into the next will be a succession of beautiful soap bubbles drifting by ......Ape+lust wrote::dance: :dance: :dance:Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
A most splendid birthday to you!
...and a gift!
[.img]http://imgur.com/ezjAaex.jpg[/img]
Many happy returns of the day. Not literally, like Groundhog Day or anything. More like hoping you keep living. So do that. Happy birthday.Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
I didn't know he'd come back after quitting Twitter forever guise.Really? wrote:Prominent SJW feminist whose movies seem always to feature skinny women in tight spandex probably won't be kicked off of Twitter for this:
Ape+lust wrote::dance: :dance: :dance:Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
A most splendid birthday to you!
...and a gift!
http://imgur.com/ezjAaex.jpg
Is he back on Twitter? Didn't he leave it after the UltronGate?Really? wrote:Prominent SJW feminist whose movies seem always to feature skinny women in tight spandex probably won't be kicked off of Twitter for this:
It's Carrara, with only three Rs and Venezia with an E. If you want to use to Italian names for Italian cities instead of the English exonyms at least get them right, PZ!Brive1987 wrote:Who was it that defended PZ's lament about his 2.5 day full time equiv "working" week?
He has a post up complaining of the horror of his first 8.00 am start. The pain of having to literally cross the road to get to work. The lecture that's so long (105 min) that he has to send the kids flying half way to an extended coffee break.
He has also posted his whiteboard for session 1A. This is what occupied a University lecture for 50 mins on evolutionary biology. One which required all that detailed lesson planning. I kid you not.
http://i.imgur.com/Nw2liuf.jpg
So. Who was it again with the bleeding heart? :)
Yea. Even if there aren't any prior to it - or major disruptions:deLurch wrote:Why do I get the feeling that Trump isn't going to survive 24 hours past the Inauguration without at least one shooting attempt on his life.
Though there is much scope for humour of a schadenfreude-ish nature and otherwise, even if some of it might be a tad premature:Greenwald wrote:The Deep State Goes to War With President-Elect, Using Unverified Claims, as Democrats Cheer
IN JANUARY 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered his farewell address after serving two terms as U.S. president; the five-star general chose to warn Americans of this specific threat to democracy: “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” That warning was issued prior to the decadelong escalation of the Vietnam War, three more decades of Cold War mania, and the post-9/11 era, all of which radically expanded that unelected faction’s power even further.
This is the faction that is now engaged in open warfare against the duly elected and already widely disliked president-elect, Donald Trump. They are using classic Cold War dirty tactics and the defining ingredients of what has until recently been denounced as “Fake News.” ....
The serious dangers posed by a Trump presidency are numerous and manifest. There is a wide array of legitimate and effective tactics for combating those threats: from bipartisan congressional coalitions and constitutional legal challenges to citizen uprisings and sustained and aggressive civil disobedience. All of those strategies have periodically proven themselves effective in times of political crisis or authoritarian overreach.
But cheering for the CIA and its shadowy allies to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive. Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of the worst kind. Demanding that evidence-free, anonymous assertions be instantly venerated as Truth — despite emanating from the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie — is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those doing it. ....
:happy-wavemulticolor: :obscene-drinkingcheers: :occasion-birthdaymulticolor: :occasion-cake: Congrats and many more - the first 59 are the toughest ;-) As the birthday card greeting goes, the secret to a long life is to keep breathing. :-)Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
Wu is bringing the lulz aplenty with this Congress campaign, it's gonna be entertaining stuff while it lasts. So, 2 retweets and 35 likes so far on that one. Just got to transform those stellar numbers into votes now! It seems as though the campaign slogan is really going to be "Wu you gonna call?" I thought that was a joke, but I think they are serious, what a fucking bobblehead.Ape+lust wrote::dance: :dance: :dance:Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
A most splendid birthday to you!
...and a gift!
http://imgur.com/ezjAaex.jpg
Indeed. Interesting question as to how cannabis affects neurotransmitters - think there are, seems obvious there are, significant benefits but non-trivial dangers too. Particularly, as you suggest, from mutant strains that maximize the psychosis-inducing effects. For my taste, and the "state of mind I'm in", it's too much like Russian Roulette - with extra chambers loaded; I've seen "The Deer Hunter" too many times not to be apprehensive - and wiser (?) :-)gurugeorge wrote:Yeah, it's the same with me. The fact is, Keith Richards excepted, our bodies are less and less able to take the abuse as we get older. I still occasionally go on a bender, but it's very rare, and takes a week to recover from.Steersman wrote:Too old to be taking such gambles:More or less :-)I don't drink much, I don't smoke
I don't be hardly mess around with no dope
Yeah I used to be a problem but
Now I am a careful man.
<snip>
Modern scientifically-developed mutant strains of dope are like strong spirits compared to the beers of our youth. I sometimes worry for those of our young people who are smoking the dopine equivalent of a couple of bottles of vodka every day.
It is good to know that Putin thinks Russia has excellent prostitutes! Haha!free thoughtpolice wrote:It's heartening to see great American like Glen Greenwald and Vladimir Putin defending the Donald from fake news.
[youtube][/youtube]
I hear it is an easy down-hill glide from now on.Steersman wrote::happy-wavemulticolor: :obscene-drinkingcheers: :occasion-birthdaymulticolor: :occasion-cake: Congrats and many more - the first 59 are the toughest ;-) As the birthday card greeting goes, the secret to a long life is to keep breathing. :-)Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
I gotta say it's hilarious seeing all the conservatives losing their shit over this when Wikileaks was their new best friend a couple months ago.Bhurzum wrote: (sorry it's a non-infowars tweet!)
Just ask Terry Schiavo, eh Steerzo?Brive1987 wrote:I hear it is an easy down-hill glide from now on.Steersman wrote::happy-wavemulticolor: :obscene-drinkingcheers: :occasion-birthdaymulticolor: :occasion-cake: Congrats and many more - the first 59 are the toughest ;-) As the birthday card greeting goes, the secret to a long life is to keep breathing. :-)Brive1987 wrote:Oh. And it's my birthday. One that ends in a 0
:/
:bjarte:
To be honest, I think a large part of the backlash against pot is not aimed at the drug itself - it's a knee-jerk aversion to any (sub)culture with roots in communism, pacifism or Eastern-leaning tendencies. Pot is simply caught in the crossfire and is guilty by association.Steersman wrote:But curious or interesting too, the conflict between more mainstream drugs and the "new" kids on the block:
Riiiight. So you've read Greenwald, and determined that everything that any "journalist" or "reputable" newsmagazine has said about DJT is the Gospel Truth, so help you gawd? Do tell. But you might first consider:free thoughtpolice wrote:It's heartening to see great American like Glen Greenwald and Vladimir Putin defending the Donald from fake news.
[.youtube][/youtube]
:-) Though one might argue that even earlier subcultures made their contributions too:Bhurzum wrote:To be honest, I think a large part of the backlash against pot is not aimed at the drug itself - it's a knee-jerk aversion to any (sub)culture with roots in communism, pacifism or Eastern-leaning tendencies. Pot is simply caught in the crossfire and is guilty by association.Steersman wrote:But curious or interesting too, the conflict between more mainstream drugs and the "new" kids on the block:
Fucking hippies, they ruin everything.
[.img]http://images.outlookindia.com/Uploads/ ... 091228.jpg[/img]
Nice one Obama, now Assange has to leave the embassy :lol:Bhurzum wrote: (sorry it's a non-infowars tweet!)
Methinks you are the pot calling the kettle black, having never actually having read an entire book and just picking out the odd juicy quote.Methinks you're a little too quick to judge the book by the cover, to have recourse to "four legs good, two legs bad".
AndrewV69 wrote:
I think that was a bad news. Xe basically committed treason and should be shot.Bhurzum wrote: (sorry it's a non-infowars tweet!)
Nice hyperbole but long ways from being accurate - your stock-in-trade?free thoughtpolice wrote:Methinks you are the pot calling the kettle black, having never actually having read an entire book and just picking out the odd juicy quote.Methinks you're a little too quick to judge the book by the cover, to have recourse to "four legs good, two legs bad".
Sure, it's somewhat amusing, somewhat ironic. Doesn't mean that Trump isn't periodically spot-on; you might actually try reading - if you're capable of it - that Quillette article on Trump's views on NATO.free thoughtpolice wrote:Actually, I doubt that peepee gate is real but I do find it funny to see Trump complaining about fake news after his birther shit and the months of quoting the Alex Jone's types and saying "some people are saying, that's what is being reported people can make up their own mind.
Sure. And will generally admit it when I've been shown credible evidence about "the error of my ways".free thoughtpolice wrote:Of course you Steersman never are victimized by confirmation bias. :lol:
??? Either I or Brive are in an irreversible persistent vegetative state? Or that's the state of everyone older than, say, 59?Lsuoma wrote:Just ask Terry Schiavo, eh Steerzo?Brive1987 wrote:I hear it is an easy down-hill glide from now on.Steersman wrote: <snip>
Congrats and many more - the first 59 are the toughest ;-) As the birthday card greeting goes, the secret to a long life is to keep breathing. :-)
:bjarte:
:lol: :lol: :lol:Sure. And will generally admit it when I've been shown credible evidence about "the error of my ways".
...you have a very peculiar idea of what constitutes "treason". Did Mark Felt commit treason against the POTUS when he passed information about Nixon's dirty tricks to Bob Woodward?free thoughtpolice wrote:I think that was a bad news. Xe basically committed treason and should be shot.Bhurzum wrote: (sorry it's a non-infowars tweet!)
On the other hand, Assange said that if Manning was shown clemency he would surrender to the US authorities.
Unfortunately for Wu, she's already made the strategic error of blocking all the people who would get the most joy out of retweeting her campaign tweets.Oglebart wrote: Wu is bringing the lulz aplenty with this Congress campaign, it's gonna be entertaining stuff while it lasts. So, 2 retweets and 35 likes so far on that one. Just got to transform those stellar numbers into votes now! It seems as though the campaign slogan is really going to be "Wu you gonna call?" I thought that was a joke, but I think they are serious, what a fucking bobblehead.
