Whether Assad is "our" enemy or not depends on "our" policies. The same is true for Iran.VickyCaramel wrote:@Kirbmarc
What is missing from your analysis is that Assad is not our enemy, he is the enemy of Israel and some factions in Lebanon.
Iran is also not our enemy, it's Saudi Arabia and Israel's enemy.
Incidentally, if you dig deep, Saudi Arabia was in the news yesterday for bombing hospitals in the Yemen. I am sure that produced bloodied 5 year olds too.
Israel is worthless as an ally, Saudi Arabia has oil. Iran has been a great bogeyman for the US and Syria has been a kicked around like a football. I am not really sure what set of moral principle lead us here.
In short, i am happy to step back and let the Russians sort it out.
Incidentally, who are "we"? The US? The EU? The UK? Australia? Switzerland? Germany? France? The answer varies according to who "we" are. I don't believe in a monolithic "West" or a monolithic "East". Countries do their own interests, and lobbies within countries do their own interests. This is true in every country. I think that a liberal democracy is always much, much better than any "populist" dictatorship, and that even populist dictatorship are better than religious theocracies.
Of course Saudi Arabia kills children in Yemen. They've been bombing Yemen for months. They probably cheer if the dead children are Shia children. The Saud dynasty and their cronies are self-serving opportunists, and Sunni Muslim supremacists (Salafis and all the assorted sympathizers) are the Nazi Party, Muslim version.
Not that the Iranian regime is much better, mind, they're only less powerful. If they had the money and connections of Saudi Arabia they'd happily massacre Sunni Muslims everywhere. They've oppressed their own minorities for years.
I have no strong feelings for or against Israel. They have enacted terrible policies and are lead by religious idiots and an ideology of Jewish supremacy, but they are the closest thing that the Middle East has to a democracy. Overall they're no better or worse than Assad's Syria. They're better than Iran or Saudi Arabia, and at the very least we don't have to deal with Jewish terrorists and Jewish supremacists who want to take over the "West", because Judaism isn't a missionary religion.
They've aligned themselves with the Saudis and Turkey against Iran for strategic reasons, but there's no love lost between Sunni Muslim supremacists and Israel, or between Salafis and Jews in general.
Incidentally I don't think that Palestinian situation is going to get better anytime soon. Hezbollah is fighting with Iran against the Islamic State (of course, as Shia they're the next on the Islamic State's list). Hamas is still carrying on their Muslim brotherhood shtick. The non-religious or multi-religious Palestinian forces (like Fatah) are losing power and support. I think that if Israel collapsed the Palestinian territories would probably become a Muslim-majority authoritarian state at best and the Islamic State 2.0 at worst.
It's no coincidence, for example, that many Druzes support Israel. (except for those who live in Golan Heights, who are more sympathetic to Assad). They know that some of the "Palestinian freedom fighters" are ready to slaughter them if they come to power.
Incidentally I think that Palestinian Christian have it bad now but wouldn't have it much better (or probably even worse) under a Hamas government of Palestine.


