Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
Brive1987 wrote:Annnnnd he is gone
Farewell August. What timing.
free thoughtpolice wrote:Not sure where he posted this, but this video is what got the ginger jihadi I mentioned on the previous page caught:comhcinc wrote:I think that ISIS is allowed to keep their pages up because it is a extremely useful method of keeping track of would be terrorist.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Friend of mine (and occasional former Pit poster) got his FB photography account suspended because the ladies were a bit too naked. Meanwhile, ISIS has a few active accounts on FB.
I am slightly pissed off right now.
[youtube]ZQ821jDTFU0[/youtube]
Some sharp eyed FBI dude saw it and contacted the RCMP that were able to stop him from killing any innocents so I think there can be good in not just shutting these guys down.
If you come across a world of buff hairy guys, name it after me.Scented Nectar wrote:Thankfully, I won't have to live up to my promise on this one, since Hello Games has set up a word filter! :lol:rayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
"SCENTED NECTAR, YOU HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY BANNED FROM THE NO MAN'S SKY UNIVERSE! THE ATLAS, GEK, KORVAX, AND VY'KEEN ALIEN RACES ALL HATE YOUR GUTS, YOU RACIST MISOGYNIST! DON'T COME BACK!"
Not at all. Now they have more time to spend together. Just him, Carrier and his wife. Road trip!Brive1987 wrote:Poor Carrier, he should put ice on the bump from where the door hit him.
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/imag ... c0f7LuxX3v
I thought it meant he's becoming a woman. Oh excuse me; that he is a woman and always has been, but will now wear frocks.Brive1987 wrote:Annnnnd he is gone
Farewell August. What timing.
This is bullshit. The investigation report doesn't seem to have been released, and they don't mention that Carrier kept speaking for the SSA after he was removed from the Bureau. AND Carrier just said that SSA told him he could keep speaking and fucking, just not on the Bureau.In connection with allegations made by a former SSA student member with respect to a former Speakers Bureau speaker, SSA conducted an inquiry into the sufficiency of our internal policies, procedures, and processes in handling such matters as part of our commitment to prioritizing the safety of our student members. After an in-depth review, it was determined that SSA will make improvements in the interest of continuing to protect the safety and well-being of SSA students. We deeply regret any flaws in the prior process that did not reach the high standard that the SSA aspires to in this aspect of our mission.
As an initial step, a special SSA task force on sexual harassment policies and procedures will make recommendations for improvement in handling and prevention, and we look forward to sharing new plans that will further support our mission of serving SSA students. We encourage any students with input to share to contact taskforce@secularstudents.org, and report of violations to SSA policies should be directed to violations@secularstudents.org. The SSA will await the recommendations of the task force to comment on potential changes to policies and procedures.
In regard to the precipitating issue, Richard Carrier was appropriately removed from the Speakers Bureau for violating the fraternization policy, which is a sufficient basis for removal of a speaker. This violation has been public knowledge, admitted by the accused, so the SSA does not consider commenting on the action taken in response to be releasing privileged information. In general, the SSA as an organization cannot litigate the validity of claims in the public domain. We take student complaints seriously, and we will continue to use all information at our disposal to improve our internal processes in the interest of student comfort and safety. In service of this priority, the SSA reserves the right to remove speakers from the Bureau for any violation of SSA policy or no stated reason at all.
We will continue to prioritize the well-being of SSA students as we move forward, and we appreciate the support of those helping us to strive to continually improve our processes.
Here's a still from next year's Carrier-led SSACon.comhcinc wrote:I vote for Carrier to take over leadership of the SSA.
I am not seeing this as a negative.Really? wrote:Here's a still from next year's Carrier-led SSACon.comhcinc wrote:I vote for Carrier to take over leadership of the SSA.
http://nightflight.com/wp-content/uploa ... LLEY-5.jpg
SJW atheists have been immoral.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Here's the thing:
With all these pretty public atheist figures coming out as poly/cheating/whatever, the religious will have more and more ammo to point at the "immorality" of atheists.
Did we really need that shit?
Meh. Who really gives a fuck?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Here's the thing:
With all these pretty public atheist figures coming out as poly/cheating/whatever, the religious will have more and more ammo to point at the "immorality" of atheists.
Did we really need that shit?
Um... it's called punching up...free thoughtpolice wrote:Speaking of asian pencil dicks:
http://heatst.com/culture-wars/mass-eff ... d-to-know/
Sorry if this is obvious noob shit, but I have heard the term 'siloism' a few times, but can't find much concise information on it. Any pointers?Brive1987 wrote:PZ has some interesting stock ideas in his latest fried-free speech post.
Firstly we get the reasoning behind his silo approach. He simply conflates the worst of trolls with anything he dislikes.
All of the women there have had Carrier's dick in them.comhcinc wrote:I am not seeing this as a negative.Really? wrote:Here's a still from next year's Carrier-led SSACon.comhcinc wrote:I vote for Carrier to take over leadership of the SSA.
http://nightflight.com/wp-content/uploa ... LLEY-5.jpg
I believe it's businessspeak:DrokkIt wrote:Sorry if this is obvious noob shit, but I have heard the term 'siloism' a few times, but can't find much concise information on it. Any pointers?Brive1987 wrote:PZ has some interesting stock ideas in his latest fried-free speech post.
Firstly we get the reasoning behind his silo approach. He simply conflates the worst of trolls with anything he dislikes.
There should just be a general policy that if you wish to say controversial things on social media, you should not in any way link your social media accounts to your employer's name. Let's just use some common sense here.katamari Damassi wrote:Was looking forward to Mass Effect Andromeda, but won't buy it because of it's game developer.
Nearly half of all marriages end in divorce. I would expect that cheating would be high up there on the list. It is so common, the only time people care is if that person might be a potential dating prospect, or if they have made part of their career out of eulogizing on morality. This is why family values republican's get dinged, for being secretly gay or cheating on their spouse, but democrats don't. It matters to their voter base.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Here's the thing:
With all these pretty public atheist figures coming out as poly/cheating/whatever, the religious will have more and more ammo to point at the "immorality" of atheists.
Did we really need that shit?
I'd rather encourage them to be as loud and stupid as possible so I'd know not to financially support them.deLurch wrote:There should just be a general policy that if you wish to say controversial things on social media, you should not in any way link your social media accounts to your employer's name. Let's just use some common sense here.katamari Damassi wrote:Was looking forward to Mass Effect Andromeda, but won't buy it because of it's game developer.
I think August deserved to get the boot. He set his poly-circle fuck fest ahead of the organization he was in charge of. If you can't make the hard choices, you should not be the one to lead.Brive1987 wrote:Annnnnd he is gone Farewell August. What timing.
"Transition"? Seems like a "fuck you" way to describe someone leaving a company/organization.Brive1987 wrote:Annnnnd he is gone
Farewell August. What timing.
Yep. Loads of people cheat on their spouses. Only people who are involved in personal relationship with them care unless they've been pontificating about morality.deLurch wrote: Nearly half of all marriages end in divorce. I would expect that cheating would be high up there on the list. It is so common, the only time people care is if that person might be a potential dating prospect, or if they have made part of their career out of eulogizing on morality. This is why family values republican's get dinged, for being secretly gay or cheating on their spouse, but democrats don't. It matters to their voter base.
But hand me an openly gay republican, and no one will care. Rule #1 of politics. Don't be a fucking hypocrite, and try to push your hypocrisy on everyone else.
Would you settle for some buff but hairless space aliens? The only other buff hairy guys are animals, but I think they have fur instead of hair. That's the best I can do.katamari Damassi wrote:If you come across a world of buff hairy guys, name it after me.Scented Nectar wrote:Thankfully, I won't have to live up to my promise on this one, since Hello Games has set up a word filter! :lol:rayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
"SCENTED NECTAR, YOU HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY BANNED FROM THE NO MAN'S SKY UNIVERSE! THE ATLAS, GEK, KORVAX, AND VY'KEEN ALIEN RACES ALL HATE YOUR GUTS, YOU RACIST MISOGYNIST! DON'T COME BACK!"
Was looking forward to Mass Effect Andromeda, but won't buy it because of it's game developer.
http://linkis.com/www.myafricanow.com/ZksSjAfrican Immigrants Lead With The Highest Academic Achievements In The US
Speaking as a Californian, I absolutely love the electoral college. TV would be unwatchable three years out of four if it were abolished.Sunder wrote:If you live in a swing state, I can't see how abolishing the electoral college and getting these fucking pols to leave your state alone couldn't be near the top of your wish list.Kirbmarc wrote:There's an interesting quote here:
"In a swing state, you're part of the presidential campaign," says political scientist Darrell West, author of Air Wars. "Everywhere else, you're outside."
I'll take the world of buff non-hairy guys then.katamari Damassi wrote: If you come across a world of buff hairy guys, name it after me.
Was looking forward to Mass Effect Andromeda, but won't buy it because of it's game developer.
Well, I'm not going to do much jousting. I'm playing the explorer style. Hey, I know, I'll just play the game twice as much and half of the exploring will be on your behalf, and I'll throw in any fighting I have to do to survive as well. It's going to be a hard promise for me to fulfill playing the game twice as much as I was planning, but I will do my best! :DService Dog wrote:Scented Nectar -- I wish to outsource my playing of No Man's Sky. Will you play it 'for' me? That is, on my behalf? Like a medieval 'champion' jousting for one's honor. So I don't have to.
Ok, "BarnOwl's Buff Non-Hairy Guy Planet" it is. :DBarnOwl wrote:I'll take the world of buff non-hairy guys then.katamari Damassi wrote: If you come across a world of buff hairy guys, name it after me.
Was looking forward to Mass Effect Andromeda, but won't buy it because of it's game developer.
Anyone want to play Ugly Olympic Athletes?
I'm in a bitchy mood. :twisted:
Im sure Columbus said something similar to Queen Isabella.Scented Nectar wrote:Well, I'm not going to do much jousting. I'm playing the explorer style. Hey, I know, I'll just play the game twice as much and half of the exploring will be on your behalf, and I'll throw in any fighting I have to do to survive as well. It's going to be a hard promise for me to fulfill playing the game twice as much as I was planning, but I will do my best! :DService Dog wrote:Scented Nectar -- I wish to outsource my playing of No Man's Sky. Will you play it 'for' me? That is, on my behalf? Like a medieval 'champion' jousting for one's honor. So I don't have to.
There are three main ways to play, or any mix you want, although people will lean towards one of the three. They are fighting, trading, and exploring. I'm exploring. Everyone does need to do a little of each category to survive though, no matter what their main enjoyment is. I'm going to have to shoot some things even though I'd rather not get into any fights at all. I'll have to defend myself against animals that sometimes attack, and space pirates, and overly trigger happy sentinels on some planets. There are also three "paths" in the game that players' early choices will determine for them, each path with its own ending to the game, probably all connected in the game's unfolding lore, though. I'm not sure if those three paths line up with the three gameplay styles though, or if they are a different set of three ways to play the game. I'm starting to think they are different based on someone's gameplay I saw streamed today.
My perfect vagina immortalised :dance:Scented Nectar wrote:Oooooh, I know, I know. I'll look for a vulva-shaped flower or something, and call it "Rayshul's Perfection". Filter safe and family friendly! No one but Pitters will know it's rather rude. :Drayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
"But maybe most women are actually still normal and unbrainfucked."rayshul wrote:Audience of Suicide Squad was almost half ladies and that was called a horrible misogynistic gun-fuckery of a movie. It made my heart warm to see the stats. I've seen a lot of women on my terrible Facebook feed go on about how Ghostbusters was amazing and fuck the man babies, so certainly a TYPE of woman definitely went out of their way to see it. But maybe most women are actually still normal and unbrainfucked.feathers wrote:I'd still like to see the m/f distribution of watchers in the old, vs. the new Ghostbusters. I suspect most women are just as averse of political bollocks in their summer flick as men.Kirbmarc wrote:That's because you have many SJW echo chambers in the art/entertainment business. Feig probably works with a marketing team which more or less ideologically aligned with him. They were probably convinced that the "misogynistic man-baby trolls" weren't going to affect the ticket sales, and were going to just generate more drama.
Ohio is a swing state. And, as the home of SSA and Camp Quest, it's also a swinger state.Sunder wrote:If you live in a swing state, I can't see how abolishing the electoral college and getting these fucking pols to leave your state alone couldn't be near the top of your wish list.Kirbmarc wrote:There's an interesting quote here:
"In a swing state, you're part of the presidential campaign," says political scientist Darrell West, author of Air Wars. "Everywhere else, you're outside."
Dang! And I too thought some part of my oeuvre might be immortalized. ;-) But have fun - do check in periodically with travelogues and tales of distant suns. :-)Scented Nectar wrote:Thankfully, I won't have to live up to my promise on this one, since Hello Games has set up a word filter! :lol:rayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
...
Hmmm, not sure I agree. Cheating is a form of lying, and I think it's fine to state that lying to others about important matters isn't trivial, even if it doesn't affect you directly. Clinton's affairs affected nobody but those "involved", but spoke very poorly of his character. Character matters, at least to me. He shouldn't have been impeached, but it does speak to trustworthiness.deLurch wrote:Nearly half of all marriages end in divorce. I would expect that cheating would be high up there on the list. It is so common, the only time people care is if that person might be a potential dating prospect, or if they have made part of their career out of eulogizing on morality. This is why family values republican's get dinged, for being secretly gay or cheating on their spouse, but democrats don't. It matters to their voter base.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Here's the thing:
With all these pretty public atheist figures coming out as poly/cheating/whatever, the religious will have more and more ammo to point at the "immorality" of atheists.
Did we really need that shit?
But hand me an openly gay republican, and no one will care. Rule #1 of politics. Don't be a fucking hypocrite, and try to push your hypocrisy on everyone else.
You've just hidden Anne Frank in your attic in 1942 in the Netherlands. And the Nazis come knocking on your door asking if you've seen a young girl that matches the description of Anne to a T. Do you lie or not?CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Hmmm, not sure I agree. Cheating is a form of lying, and I think it's fine to state that lying to others about important matters isn't trivial, even if it doesn't affect you directly. Clinton's affairs affected nobody but those "involved", but spoke very poorly of his character. Character matters, at least to me. He shouldn't have been impeached, but it does speak to trustworthiness.deLurch wrote:Nearly half of all marriages end in divorce. I would expect that cheating would be high up there on the list. .... Rule #1 of politics. Don't be a fucking hypocrite, and try to push your hypocrisy on everyone else.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Here's the thing:
With all these pretty public atheist figures coming out as poly/cheating/whatever, the religious will have more and more ammo to point at the "immorality" of atheists.
Did we really need that shit?
I am probably absolutely alone on this, but there it is. If a person will cheat on their spouse, they'll cheat on deals, money and any other form of trust. YMMV, IMHO, etc
This is exactly why I am only willing to cheat on my spouse with women named "Anne Frank". My conscience is clear.Steersman wrote: You've just hidden Anne Frank in your attic in 1942 in the Netherlands. And the Nazis come knocking on your door asking if you've seen a young girl that matches the description of Anne to a T. Do you lie or not?
The problem is in anathematizing lying, in making strictures against it into absolutes, with no consideration of other ethical imperatives that might justifiably carry greater weight.
Would you bend this policy for someone named Amy Frank?Cnutella wrote:
This is exactly why I am only willing to cheat on my spouse with women named "Anne Frank". My conscience is clear.
:) Even if the field of opportunity is quite limited ...Cnutella wrote:This is exactly why I am only willing to cheat on my spouse with women named "Anne Frank". My conscience is clear.Steersman wrote: You've just hidden Anne Frank in your attic in 1942 in the Netherlands. And the Nazis come knocking on your door asking if you've seen a young girl that matches the description of Anne to a T. Do you lie or not?
The problem is in anathematizing lying, in making strictures against it into absolutes, with no consideration of other ethical imperatives that might justifiably carry greater weight.
Yea. But you might take a look at this:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I saw on FB that Trump allegedly stated ISIS was the creation of Obama/Clinton. Of course, fury is deployed by Clinton supporters.
BUT, here in France it's the prevailing theory of the regressive/far Left. ISIS is solely a creation of the US and Israel (because of course, always Israel).
Fucking politics, right?
I have no idea how accurate it might be. But considering that Saudi Arabia is an "ally" of the US, and that there's probably a hair's breadth of difference between the Islam of Saudi Arabia and that of ISIS, it seems hard not to put at least some credence in that "theory".2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”
It's probably just a new variation on sleep paralysis. Every era interprets the phenomena its own way.deLurch wrote:I believe women do not lie about rape.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... droom.html
I agree it's a big possibility, and I'm not going to discuss the subject itself much. I just find it amusing that in the end both Trump and his direct opposite are saying the same thing. It's just a general observation on politics.Steersman wrote:Yea. But you might take a look at this:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I saw on FB that Trump allegedly stated ISIS was the creation of Obama/Clinton. Of course, fury is deployed by Clinton supporters.
BUT, here in France it's the prevailing theory of the regressive/far Left. ISIS is solely a creation of the US and Israel (because of course, always Israel).
Fucking politics, right?I have no idea how accurate it might be. But considering that Saudi Arabia is an "ally" of the US, and that there's probably a hair's breadth of difference between the Islam of Saudi Arabia and that of ISIS, it seems hard not to put at least some credence in that "theory".2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I agree it's a big possibility, and I'm not going to discuss the subject itself much. I just find it amusing that in the end both Trump and his direct opposite are saying the same thing. It's just a general observation on politics.Steersman wrote:Yea. But you might take a look at this:Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I saw on FB that Trump allegedly stated ISIS was the creation of Obama/Clinton. Of course, fury is deployed by Clinton supporters.
BUT, here in France it's the prevailing theory of the regressive/far Left. ISIS is solely a creation of the US and Israel (because of course, always Israel).
Fucking politics, right?I have no idea how accurate it might be. But considering that Saudi Arabia is an "ally" of the US, and that there's probably a hair's breadth of difference between the Islam of Saudi Arabia and that of ISIS, it seems hard not to put at least some credence in that "theory".2012 Defense Intelligence Agency document: West will facilitate rise of Islamic State “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”
A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)
That should be a Top post X3.Shatterface wrote:It's probably just a new variation on sleep paralysis. Every era interprets the phenomena its own way.deLurch wrote:I believe women do not lie about rape.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... droom.html
Still, the police should round up the Pokemon just in case. Gotta catch 'em all.
They're making me wait until 1 this afternoon (EST) for the game to come out. :( :( :( :cry: :cry: :cry: :( :( :( :cry: :cry: :cry:Service Dog wrote:Im sure Columbus said something similar to Queen Isabella.Scented Nectar wrote:Well, I'm not going to do much jousting. I'm playing the explorer style. Hey, I know, I'll just play the game twice as much and half of the exploring will be on your behalf, and I'll throw in any fighting I have to do to survive as well. It's going to be a hard promise for me to fulfill playing the game twice as much as I was planning, but I will do my best! :DService Dog wrote:Scented Nectar -- I wish to outsource my playing of No Man's Sky. Will you play it 'for' me? That is, on my behalf? Like a medieval 'champion' jousting for one's honor. So I don't have to.
There are three main ways to play, or any mix you want, although people will lean towards one of the three. They are fighting, trading, and exploring. I'm exploring. Everyone does need to do a little of each category to survive though, no matter what their main enjoyment is. I'm going to have to shoot some things even though I'd rather not get into any fights at all. I'll have to defend myself against animals that sometimes attack, and space pirates, and overly trigger happy sentinels on some planets. There are also three "paths" in the game that players' early choices will determine for them, each path with its own ending to the game, probably all connected in the game's unfolding lore, though. I'm not sure if those three paths line up with the three gameplay styles though, or if they are a different set of three ways to play the game. I'm starting to think they are different based on someone's gameplay I saw streamed today.
I was going to say that I just know I'll come across your vagina somewhere out there, but that might be open to misinterpretation. :lol:rayshul wrote:My perfect vagina immortalised :dance:Scented Nectar wrote:Oooooh, I know, I know. I'll look for a vulva-shaped flower or something, and call it "Rayshul's Perfection". Filter safe and family friendly! No one but Pitters will know it's rather rude. :Drayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
He signed off on it? :lol: :lol: No word on the client.last autumn he hired me to give his blog a new look. I’ve been worn out over the last ten months, stretched thin between a day job and half a dozen other projects and creatively tired—all credit goes to James for showing me far more patience than I deserved—but this week I at last signed off on it.
I would love to immortalize you in NMS!!! You are one of my favourite people here. I need some hints though. A sea filled planet would fit in good with your seafaring avatar, but that's all I can think of. Do you have any favourite weather conditions or colours or anything like that?Steersman wrote:Dang! And I too thought some part of my oeuvre might be immortalized. ;-) But have fun - do check in periodically with travelogues and tales of distant suns. :-)Scented Nectar wrote:Thankfully, I won't have to live up to my promise on this one, since Hello Games has set up a word filter! :lol:rayshul wrote:I vote for a planet called Niggercunt.
Have fun on your travels Scented. :D
...
If I find a planet full of winged creatures flying around the garden like that, I'm calling it FairyLand!Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Not sure about NMS anymore...
Dazzling!Brive1987 wrote:Alex has come out of hibernation to describe how he vandalised the branding of a Patheos blog
http://archive.is/wbTPJ
This from a dude whose Twitter feed literally choked itself on gaming bs:
He signed off on it? :lol: :lol: No word on the client.last autumn he hired me to give his blog a new look. I’ve been worn out over the last ten months, stretched thin between a day job and half a dozen other projects and creatively tired—all credit goes to James for showing me far more patience than I deserved—but this week I at last signed off on it.
Anyway Gabs takes many hundreds of words to explain how he hand fashioned this beauty.
http://cdn1.the-orbit.net/godlessness/w ... ernate.jpg
A complex design rendered incomprehensible and no doubt taking its cue from:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag ... 71jl8eq2jQ
