The Refuge of the Toads

Old subthreads
Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3361

Post by Tigzy »

Brive1987 wrote: https://unbelievesteve.wordpress.com/20 ... one-night/
The first “Elevator date” occurred at 2:30am Saturday morning dated 4th June 2011. This hotel room “blogtv” date was conducted the night/morning before Rebecca Watson took to the stage to talk about whatever the heck she talked about.

The second “Elevator date” occurred at 4:00am Sunday morning dated 5th June 2011. This event took place after Watson’s panel discussion, which places the creepo-guy incident the following night.

So what’s the punchline? WTF did i waste an hour writing this blog? Um, just a word to the wise here guys, if you’re going to invite the Bexter up to your room, make sure you’re as famous as fuck, run a blogtv channel and have plenty of booze. Fuck the coffee okayish?
Ah right. As Strawkins said, it did seem a bit too good to be true. Still, only a day apart...and it does seem weirdly congruent with what happened as regards Elevator Guy. Who knows, maybe EG got wind of what Becky & DRPJones got up to, and next day figured Ms Potato Face might be amenable to another hotel room invite.

Shatterface
.
.
Posts: 5898
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3362

Post by Shatterface »

dogen wrote:
What if elevatorguy was Becky's reflection?
Well she does claim to have prosopagnosia.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3363

Post by Lsuoma »

:burn: :burn: :burn:
Shatterface wrote:Prosopagnosia also affects the ability to remember your own face so maybe it's something she picked up deliberately.
:burn: :burn: :burn:

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3364

Post by comhcinc »

NoGodsEver wrote:I don't think she is making the whole thing up. I don't even think she ever intended it to be a thing. It was a throwaway line that started a shit storm. It was the shooting of Archduke Ferdinand.


I also don't believe she was walking around asking people not to hit on her. I mean who the fuck does that?
Once again, showing how sadly deluded you are. Archduke Ferdinand was never shot. Links to websites that prove it are forthcoming.
Also, OJ is innocent.[/quote]


http://gutbusterwrestling.com/wp-conten ... /pepsi.jpg

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3365

Post by Steersman »

Clarence wrote:
HunnyBunny wrote:Brianna Wu is having a moment on twitter. Her hit squad followers are raging at her friend Jesse Singal over that trans clinic article (it's well worth a read http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/02/fi ... fired.html I've been following this for a while, and it's mind-blowing how screwed up the whole trans activism scene is becoming).
That article made me cry.
An old man demonized, people playing politics with science and worse - with kids. Some kids lives will be ruined by this. It's like with circumscision: don't make unnecessary , permanent changes to people before they are old enough to make their own informed decisions.
The kids are the big losers here, trans kids and 'de persisters' alike.
Indeed, although I think there is some justification for some of the transactivists positions: while it is maybe to be preferred that the kids make their own decisions, the problem is that later can be too late. As Alice Dreger put it in her Gender Mad post:
Why not transition everybody who says she or he is the other sex? All other things being equal, it’s a lot easier on your body if you don’t try to change your sex hormones, genitals, etc. The interventions involved in sex reassignment are non-trivial.

Make no mistake: If you start hormonal sex change before your inborn-sex-directed puberty is well on its way, then you’ll end up much better off in terms of your adult sexed appearance and in terms of avoiding other interventions, and so you’ll also benefit psychologically, if it was the right choice.
And there's the rub. As Dreger argued earlier in her post, the point is that many if not most such interventions turn out to be the wrong ones - as the "de-transitioning" tales illustrate:
Dreger wrote:I don’t doubt that these particular transgender adults look back and see that, from very early on, they had been assigned a gender that didn’t make sense for them. The mistake they make is then to assume that every child who expresses doubt about his or her birth gender assignment should simply be “affirmed” by parents and clinicians in their “new” gender.

This is an unbelievably simplistic understanding of what’s going on with these children. Yes, some of them will grow up to be transgender; Zucker and others have documented that, over and over again. But if history is a guide, the majority will not. Trying to make sure they all get the best care they need is the goal of clinics like Zucker’s, as well as the clinics run by other good folks at the children’s hospitals of UCLA, Northwestern, Seattle, and on and on.
Bit of a mess, and one can maybe sympathize with the views of some transactivists, but some justification for Singal and others arguing that many such are predicated on "harmful anti-science dogmatism":


Referenced Feministing post.

pajh
.
.
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:04 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3366

Post by pajh »

http://archive.is/mpm3D

Major twatter lolz - black guy threatens white woman (well her computer) and well she is a Trump supporter - gets 16,000+ licks or retwats or something, maybe violence occurs ...

So if a black dude hits a white lady trump supporter is that punching up or down?

Guest_0048cc29

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3367

Post by Guest_0048cc29 »

Why not transition everybody who says she or he is the other sex? All other things being equal, it’s a lot easier on your body if you don’t try to change your sex hormones, genitals, etc. The interventions involved in sex reassignment are non-trivial.

Make no mistake: If you start hormonal sex change before your inborn-sex-directed puberty is well on its way, then you’ll end up much better off in terms of your adult sexed appearance and in terms of avoiding other interventions, and so you’ll also benefit psychologically, if it was the right choice.
I don't know if Dreger mentions it or not, and I am not an MD, nor am I particularly well read in this, but my understanding is that while the above seems certainly to be true, what is not true is that the drugs involved in delaying puberty are harmless, side-effect free, OR reversible.

As one example

pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/when-transgender-kids-transition-medical-risks-are-both-known-and-unknown/

admits the medical risks are unknown (while quoting MDs saying they believe it's basically safe.)

I think the idea of puberty blockers is a good one, because a huge issue that the trans community sees as oppression is that trans women who cannot pass are seen as men in dresses (trans men who cannot pass are seen as butch, fashionable, edgy, hip, ...)

jugheadnaut
.
.
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3368

Post by jugheadnaut »

comhcinc wrote:Couple days old.
I am pro choice as they come but fuck me fetuses are human. These people really do only think of themselves.
It's especially bad given the dialogue makes clear the fetus is full-term. If NARAL is among those fanatics who believe abortion of a full-term fetus is justified if that's the mother's choice since it isn't human yet, they should probably work on keeping that to themselves if they want to be useful in the pro-choice cause.

Maybe even more forehead slapping was their tweet in response to a cute, innocuous commercial where the NFL celebrates the claim that there is an increased birth rate in Super Bowl winning cities nine months after the game.

[youtube]9KqekigARfE[/youtube]
They're ruing the fact that babies were born when there's zero indication these children were unplanned or unwanted? Arch-conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh popularized the term "feminazi" and claimed he wan't applying it to all feminists but only to a small extremist faction that celebrates when a woman has an abortion over giving birth. I don't think he was consistent in this usage, but NARAL provides evidence he had identified a genuine faction. No doubt social conservatives are enjoying this example where a grossly incompetent enemy is the best ally.

Bourne Skeptic
.
.
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:18 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3369

Post by Bourne Skeptic »

pajh wrote:http://archive.is/mpm3D

Major twatter lolz - black guy threatens white woman (well her computer) and well she is a Trump supporter - gets 16,000+ licks or retwats or something, maybe violence occurs ...

So if a black dude hits a white lady trump supporter is that punching up or down?
That's social justice 101. We're not here to spoon-feed you, however I'll provide a simple explanation because you're new to this forum.
Attachments
Punching Hierarchy.jpg
(127.28 KiB) Downloaded 268 times

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5236
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3370

Post by KiwiInOz »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Probably :nin:

I chuckled.

[youtube]j556MWGVVqI[/youtube]
He who laughs last laughs longest.

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3371

Post by VickyCaramel »

KiwiInOz wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Probably :nin:

I chuckled.

[youtube]j556MWGVVqI[/youtube]
He who laughs last laughs longest.
She who laughed last, didn't get the joke and was laughing out of discomfort.

dogen
.
.
Posts: 2581
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3372

Post by dogen »

So, on a completely different note: tomorrow, there's going to be a big annoucement by the LIGO consortium. The expectation is that they will report the direct detection of gravitational waves -- a first, and on the 100th anniversary year of their prediction by Einstein. This is a Big Thing.

Rumor has it that the source of the waves is a merger between a pair of ~30-solar-mass black holes. As the black holes orbit one another, they emit gravitational waves (ripples in the fabric of space-time) which propagate outward. These waves carry away orbital energy, meaning that over time the BH's spiral toward one another and eventually merge.

Another plausible hypothesis for the source of the waves is that Lindy West uncrossed her legs.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3373

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

jugheadnaut wrote:snip commie

Maybe even more forehead slapping was their tweet in response to a cute, innocuous commercial where the NFL celebrates the claim that there is an increased birth rate in Super Bowl winning cities nine months after the game.

[youtube]9KqekigARfE[/youtube]
They're ruing the fact that babies were born when there's zero indication these children were unplanned or unwanted? Arch-conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh popularized the term "feminazi" and claimed he wan't applying it to all feminists but only to a small extremist faction that celebrates when a woman has an abortion over giving birth. I don't think he was consistent in this usage, but NARAL provides evidence he had identified a genuine faction. No doubt social conservatives are enjoying this example where a grossly incompetent enemy is the best ally.
It's really tone-deaf when they point to a living, presumably healthy child and that the parents should have used birth control. That does their message no favors at all.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3374

Post by Lsuoma »

dogen wrote:So, on a completely different note: tomorrow, there's going to be a big annoucement by the LIGO consortium. The expectation is that they will report the direct detection of gravitational waves -- a first, and on the 100th anniversary year of their prediction by Einstein. This is a Big Thing.

Rumor has it that the source of the waves is a merger between a pair of ~30-solar-mass black holes. As the black holes orbit one another, they emit gravitational waves (ripples in the fabric of space-time) which propagate outward. These waves carry away orbital energy, meaning that over time the BH's spiral toward one another and eventually merge.

Another plausible hypothesis for the source of the waves is that Lindy West uncrossed her legs.
Cool. I organized a work trip to LIGO just a few years ago, when it was just the original experiment.

I would upload some photographs from the visit, but I can't be bothered to strip out the exif data, and I don't want to doxx myself.

NoGodsEver
.
.
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 1:05 am
Location: Pacific NW
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3375

Post by NoGodsEver »

Lsuoma wrote:
dogen wrote:So, on a completely different note: tomorrow, there's going to be a big annoucement by the LIGO consortium. The expectation is that they will report the direct detection of gravitational waves -- a first, and on the 100th anniversary year of their prediction by Einstein. This is a Big Thing.

Rumor has it that the source of the waves is a merger between a pair of ~30-solar-mass black holes. As the black holes orbit one another, they emit gravitational waves (ripples in the fabric of space-time) which propagate outward. These waves carry away orbital energy, meaning that over time the BH's spiral toward one another and eventually merge.

Another plausible hypothesis for the source of the waves is that Lindy West uncrossed her legs.
Cool. I organized a work trip to LIGO just a few years ago, when it was just the original experiment.

I would upload some photographs from the visit, but I can't be bothered to strip out the exif data, and I don't want to doxx myself.
I know who you are. Your secret is safe with me. For now.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5236
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3376

Post by KiwiInOz »

VickyCaramel wrote:
She who laughed last, didn't get the joke and was laughing out of discomfort.
I'm just pleased that Conc can still laugh despite the death threat I posted here last week.

Sunder
.
.
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3377

Post by Sunder »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:It's really tone-deaf when they point to a living, presumably healthy child and that the parents should have used birth control. That does their message no favors at all.
This irks me to no end. Modern activists SUCK at outreach. Because activist organizations have filled themselves up with virtue signalling dickheads.

jugheadnaut
.
.
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3378

Post by jugheadnaut »

[youtube]bc6Z7AEEao8[/youtube]

So, in Sargon's latest the disconcertingly gorgeous woman in the intro frame says the following (11:30):
I stand with Melissa Click because she knows that just because the media has to make a deadline doesn't mean they can disrespect stories, narratives, and communities.
There's a word for stories and narratives that are primarily meant to represent the interests of a community as opposed to representing the truth, and that's 'propaganda'. There's also a word for the sort of society where the media's function is to respect propaganda, and that's 'fascist'. It's actually worse when such ugly ideas come from such a beautiful source.

Old_ones
.
.
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:46 pm
Location: An hour's drive from Hell.
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3379

Post by Old_ones »

jugheadnaut wrote:[youtube]bc6Z7AEEao8[/youtube]

So, in Sargon's latest the disconcertingly gorgeous woman in the intro frame says the following (11:30):
I stand with Melissa Click because she knows that just because the media has to make a deadline doesn't mean they can disrespect stories, narratives, and communities.
There's a word for stories and narratives that are primarily meant to represent the interests of a community as opposed to representing the truth, and that's 'propaganda'. There's also a word for the sort of society where the media's function is to respect propaganda, and that's 'fascist'. It's actually worse when such ugly ideas come from such a beautiful source.
Meh. 6/10. Or if you correct for personality 3/10.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3380

Post by welch »

comhcinc wrote:People having fun posting great music and guess who comes along and ruins the flow?


Hey that reminds me. Welch you might enough some Company Flow.

[youtube]6PXB8uyJNZI[/youtube]
That's pretty sweet.

Bourne Skeptic
.
.
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:18 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3381

Post by Bourne Skeptic »

Old_ones wrote:
jugheadnaut wrote:[youtube]bc6Z7AEEao8[/youtube]

So, in Sargon's latest the disconcertingly gorgeous woman in the intro frame says the following (11:30):
I stand with Melissa Click because she knows that just because the media has to make a deadline doesn't mean they can disrespect stories, narratives, and communities.
There's a word for stories and narratives that are primarily meant to represent the interests of a community as opposed to representing the truth, and that's 'propaganda'. There's also a word for the sort of society where the media's function is to respect propaganda, and that's 'fascist'. It's actually worse when such ugly ideas come from such a beautiful source.
Meh. 6/10. Or if you correct for personality 3/10.
Quite fappable when she's muted.

jugheadnaut
.
.
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3382

Post by jugheadnaut »

Old_ones wrote:
Meh. 6/10. Or if you correct for personality 3/10.
The SJW trademark look of anguish definitely doesn't help, not does that weird stare down thing she does at the end. But I think she's a guaranteed 9 if she just had a relaxed smile on her face. I won't argue with the personality correction, though.

jet_lagg
.
.
Posts: 2570
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3383

Post by jet_lagg »

Sunder wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:It's really tone-deaf when they point to a living, presumably healthy child and that the parents should have used birth control. That does their message no favors at all.
This irks me to no end. Modern activists SUCK at outreach. Because activist organizations have filled themselves up with virtue signalling dickheads.
Thirded. I don't know how many of you saw the #ShoutYourAbortion nonsense on twitter, but it filled me with deep loathing. I'm as pro-choice as they come, enough so that it's a deal-breaker if a politician wants to defund Planned Parenthood or criminalize abortion, but don't approach me as if you've done something virtuous by terminating a candidate human.

I end up siding with the feminists because we share an end goal, but by the gods they fucking sicken me.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3384

Post by welch »

Ape+lust wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:I knew there was some criticism of the term Dick for Dawkins. But I hadn't seen or heard of this campaign before. Wow.

http://archive.is/wQYku
"It was not a gendered insult, but a calculatedly informal salutation."

--- Peez
The best part was Zvan, who had a fucking meltdown if you used any diminutive form of her first name defending it as a common diminutive for "Richard".

She came out of the womb going full klein bottle.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3385

Post by welch »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Finally saw Blazing Saddles.

Utter crap, not even a light giggle.

I'll stick to Airplane!
You're dead to me.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3386

Post by welch »

dinkum wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Finally saw Blazing Saddles.

Utter crap, not even a light giggle.

I'll stick to Airplane!
That makes me sad, but yeah, watching for the first time now would be pretty disappointing. Every joke in it has been stolen, stripped, repainted, reused, resold and recycled as firelighters a million times since 1974. I saw it in the day, in the theater with my dad (R rating, y'know), so I'm one of those weirdos who holds it in high regard. I also grew up in Kansas, so the "people of the land" speech still kills me.

Mileage varies, and all that.
Good point. Having seen it when released, it was really quite radical. (Honestly, if you released it now, there'd be riots, but for stupid reasons.) and yeah, that speech made me snort so much soda out of my nose. "You know...morons." It was great.

Also, "Now watch. me. faggots". Brooks was one of the few directors that knew how to use Dom Deluise's talent.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3387

Post by welch »

Shatterface wrote:Prosopagnosia also affects the ability to remember your own face so maybe it's something she picked up deliberately.
Looking at that every morning in a deep hangover, yeah, prosopagnosia would be a fucking blessing.

Bourne Skeptic
.
.
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:18 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3388

Post by Bourne Skeptic »

welch wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Finally saw Blazing Saddles.

Utter crap, not even a light giggle.

I'll stick to Airplane!
You're dead to me.
The French think Jerry Lewis is a comedy god :o :shock: :? :cry: :roll: :naughty:

Poor Phil's been brainwashed.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3389

Post by welch »

Billy The Hillbilly wrote:https://memecrunch.com/meme/MMN9/sugart ... ?w=400&c=1

what's up sugar tits
WHOAAAAA-OH-WHOAAAA-OH-WHOAA-WHOAAAAAA

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6370
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3390

Post by Really? »

[youtube]bc6Z7AEEao8[/youtube]

She looks like Rosario Dawson, except being around her for more than ten minutes will make you want to kill yourself.

http://www.autostraddle.com/wp-content/ ... 31x500.jpg

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3391

Post by welch »

Shatterface wrote:I don't care where people are from, christening your baby girl Sugar Tits is always wrong.
Hey, some people are born to be strippers. May as well save them from having to come up with a stage name.

jet_lagg
.
.
Posts: 2570
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3392

Post by jet_lagg »

So, I reported for jury duty today. Wasn't selected, alas, but it gave me time to finish Steven Pinker's The Language Instinct. A quote jumped out at me that I'm sure the pit will appreciate:
[John] Simon has simply discovered the trick used with great effectiveness by certain comedians, talk show hosts and punk rock musicians: people of modest talent can attract attention, at least for a while, by being unrelentingly offensive.
Which immediately reminded me of another by Mary Ann Evans (a.k.a. George Eliot):
Given, a man with moderate intellect, a moral standard not higher than the average, some rhetorical affluence and great glibness of speech, what is the career in which, without the aid of birth or money, he may most easily attain power and reputation in English society? Where is the Goshen of mediocrity in which a smattering of science and learning will pass for profound instruction, where platitudes will be accepted as wisdom, bigoted narrowness as holy zeal, unctuous egoism as God-given piety? Let such a man become an evangelical preacher; he will then find it possible to reconcile small ability with great ambition, superficial knowledge with the prestige of erudition, a middling morale with a high reputation for sanctity.
The usual suspects rely on these sort of tricks, and are destined to fail in the course of history. They'll never have the lasting power of a Darwin or a Chomsky, and I suspect they know it deep down inside.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3393

Post by welch »

jugheadnaut wrote:
John D wrote:Ahhh... the memories...back when people actually wanted some of that action...
Becki advertising her pants.jpg
Here's my speculative psychological analysis of Watson. She was probably a wallflower most of her life, but when she reached her peak attractiveness in her 20's she suddenly started getting a lot of male attention. Understandably, this made her feel good and gave her a sense of power, and maybe she got a little drunk off this power (as well as other substances). Unfortunately, her peak attractiveness era was butterfly-lifespan short and her sexual power was mostly lost. She greatly resents this, and it has led to a growing hatred of men who no longer give her the attention and sense of desirability that she thinks she deserves.
She's SCA attractive. In a normal social gathering or situation, she's maybe a 6. 7 possibly.

But in atheist and nerd gatherings? Shit, she turns into a ten just by bathing regularly and not fucking up a ponytail, and she is surrounded by guys who are so deep into the "Nice Guy Ploy" (i.e. "I'll kiss your ass until you pity-fuck me), and think it's actually working that with very little work, she could have had a palanquin team for life.

But she keeps trying to write checks her abilities can't cash, and clever snark only substitutes for intelligence for so long. She reminds me of the kid in my last programming class that I almost defenestrated. Every class, EVERY class, he would ask some vaguely related but not really question designed only to demonstrate how fucking clever he was.

No one bought it, and he ended up failing the class (stupid tits, READ THE SYLLABUS) but the mooks ate it up. Watson's the same way. Knows just enough to seem smart, but not enough to be quiet when around people who ARE smart.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3394

Post by Lsuoma »

Old_ones wrote:
jugheadnaut wrote:[youtube]bc6Z7AEEao8[/youtube]

So, in Sargon's latest the disconcertingly gorgeous woman in the intro frame says the following (11:30):
I stand with Melissa Click because she knows that just because the media has to make a deadline doesn't mean they can disrespect stories, narratives, and communities.
There's a word for stories and narratives that are primarily meant to represent the interests of a community as opposed to representing the truth, and that's 'propaganda'. There's also a word for the sort of society where the media's function is to respect propaganda, and that's 'fascist'. It's actually worse when such ugly ideas come from such a beautiful source.
Meh. 6/10. Or if you correct for personality 3/10.
-3 for Problem Glasses.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3395

Post by welch »

John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
I've shown this to a number of women I know and the reaction is the same: "Jesus, what a cunt"

It's a story of petty cruelty, and the worst part is people applauding her.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10769
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3396

Post by free thoughtpolice »

welch wrote:
John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
I've shown this to a number of women I know and the reaction is the same: "Jesus, what a cunt"

It's a story of petty cruelty, and the worst part is people applauding her.
A sober Reginald saw an arrogant, insulting slob and had a fear that he might have helped her reproduce.
If he didn't believe in abortion, and /or if she became pregnant he might become anchored to an unpleasant person.
Reginald did the smart thing.
Sometimes it is best to sheath your sword. :ugeek:

jet_lagg
.
.
Posts: 2570
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3397

Post by jet_lagg »

Calling it now. SJW protest over the xenophobia moral in a children's film. Clearly pro-Trump, anti-Muslim.

[youtube]QRmKa7vvct4[/youtube]

ffs
.
.
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 6:27 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3398

Post by ffs »

welch wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Finally saw Blazing Saddles.

Utter crap, not even a light giggle.

I'll stick to Airplane!
You're dead to me.
Just give him some time, and a trampoline

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3399

Post by Skep tickle »

This the video is the AM panel with Paula Kirby from the now-infamous 2011 conference in Dublin:

[youtube]2_O33OsA-vM[/youtube]

In the 1st few minutes:
1) It's titled "Women Atheists" but RW wasn't on it
2) Paula Kirby speaks 1st (after the intro), says right away that she doesn't see a need for a panel on this topic

WEIT on the session: https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... activists/

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3400

Post by Skep tickle »

Correction, the panel session was titled: "Women Atheist Activists". (Still, RW wasn't on it.)

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17178
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3401

Post by Brive1987 »

Its ok Skep and Ape. Ive copied your treasures over to the history thread.

;)

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3402

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

KiwiInOz wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
She who laughed last, didn't get the joke and was laughing out of discomfort.
I'm just pleased that Conc can still laugh despite the death threat I posted here last week.
That was just my kids you killed, I just need to puff out a few million spores to replace them by tomorrow.

How long is gestation for your species? And don't you need to get laid first?

http://i.imgur.com/9ZRBYyf.png

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17178
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3403

Post by Brive1987 »

Skep tickle wrote:This the video is the AM panel with Paula Kirby from the now-infamous 2011 conference in Dublin:

[youtube]2_O33OsA-vM[/youtube]

In the 1st few minutes:
1) It's titled "Women Atheists" but RW wasn't on it
2) Paula Kirby speaks 1st (after the intro), says right away that she doesn't see a need for a panel on this topic

WEIT on the session: https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... activists/
Ok. So now I get it. Elevatorgate is Paula Kirby's fault.

FFS - for 12 mins she lectures a certain type of woman against any tendency to oppression bullshit. Not enough questions asked by women? They should bloody well drop the shyness and speak up. What if data supported the notion that women were being 'held back' in atheism? Well she would accept it but would think less of the snowflake women who allowed that to happen. On and on.

No wonder Watson hijacked the next days session - pissing of Dawkins (blessed be his name). No wonder she spent the night lecturing hopeful newbs on how bad it is. No wonder there is plausible motivated reasoning behind making up the lift incident. Or leveraging the hell out of such an unexpected windfall. No wonder McGraw struck a Kirby bone and needed to be similarly schooled from the podium at CFI.

Kirby lives in the real world and Watson resides in the land of Youtube comments. And Kirby negated this lived experience and told Watson indirectly that she was a prissy petulant princess.

I leave you with Kirby's essay "The sisterhood of the oppressed"
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B02RDDb ... edit?pli=1

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3404

Post by fuzzy »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
A sober Reginald saw an arrogant, insulting slob and had a fear that he might have helped her reproduce.
If he didn't believe in abortion, and /or if she became pregnant he might become anchored to an unpleasant person.
Reginald did the smart thing.
Sometimes it is best to sheath your sword. :ugeek:
Be like Reginald.

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3405

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny »

fuzzy wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
A sober Reginald saw an arrogant, insulting slob and had a fear that he might have helped her reproduce.
If he didn't believe in abortion, and /or if she became pregnant he might become anchored to an unpleasant person.
Reginald did the smart thing.
Sometimes it is best to sheath your sword. :ugeek:
Be like Reginald.
Hey, Fuzzy, long time! Doin' okay?

Old_ones
.
.
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:46 pm
Location: An hour's drive from Hell.
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3406

Post by Old_ones »

If anyone wants to listen to Mykeru ramble for ramble for a really long time about... something or other... this now exists:

[youtube]uBGTal4qsm0[/youtube]

some guy
.
.
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:05 am
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3407

Post by some guy »

Skep tickle wrote:This the video is the AM panel with Paula Kirby from the now-infamous 2011 conference in Dublin:

[youtube]2_O33OsA-vM[/youtube]

In the 1st few minutes:
1) It's titled "Women Atheists" but RW wasn't on it
2) Paula Kirby speaks 1st (after the intro), says right away that she doesn't see a need for a panel on this topic

WEIT on the session: https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... activists/
Paula's comment in that thread at WEIT is worth a read. (Jerry links to it in an update added to at the begining of his post)

fuzzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3408

Post by fuzzy »

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
fuzzy wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
A sober Reginald saw an arrogant, insulting slob and had a fear that he might have helped her reproduce.
If he didn't believe in abortion, and /or if she became pregnant he might become anchored to an unpleasant person.
Reginald did the smart thing.
Sometimes it is best to sheath your sword. :ugeek:
Be like Reginald.
Hey, Fuzzy, long time! Doin' okay?
Yeah, I just wanted to see if I could hold my breath for a month.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5236
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3409

Post by KiwiInOz »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
She who laughed last, didn't get the joke and was laughing out of discomfort.
I'm just pleased that Conc can still laugh despite the death threat I posted here last week.
That was just my kids you killed, I just need to puff out a few million spores to replace them by tomorrow.

How long is gestation for your species? And don't you need to get laid first?

http://i.imgur.com/9ZRBYyf.png
He's just resting - shagged out.

mordacious1
.
.
Posts: 970
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3410

Post by mordacious1 »

John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
That's not the way I heard it. Becky brings out condoms, Morman guy doesn't think two of those will be enough and hands Becky a toothbrush. :o

Really?
.
.
Posts: 6370
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3411

Post by Really? »

mordacious1 wrote:
John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
That's not the way I heard it. Becky brings out condoms, Morman guy doesn't think two of those will be enough and hands Becky a toothbrush. :o
Much more disturbing is that some of the women and men in the audience are laughing. That skeptical audience doesn't seem to think that safe sex and respecting a partner's boundaries are things.

x_?_x
.
.
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 12:54 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3412

Post by x_?_x »

Re-reading about ElevatorGate just reminds me how crazy all that was.

There are people who listen to Rebecca Watson and think she makes sense. I will never understand it.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3413

Post by Lsuoma »

Really? wrote:
mordacious1 wrote:
John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
That's not the way I heard it. Becky brings out condoms, Morman guy doesn't think two of those will be enough and hands Becky a toothbrush. :o
Much more disturbing is that some of the women and men in the audience are laughing. That skeptical audience doesn't seem to think that safe sex and respecting a partner's boundaries are things.
I also get from this vid that she is basically a failed stand-up comedian. Just like Two-cows (who he?) who gave up stand-up after complaining he had to explain his jokes. In short, they are staggeringly boring IRL, which they are convinced doesn't comport with the Carlinesque performance inside their own realities,

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3414

Post by comhcinc »

Skep tickle wrote:Correction, the panel session was titled: "Women Atheist Activists". (Still, RW wasn't on it.)
Is she any of those things?

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3415

Post by Lsuoma »

Lsuoma wrote:
Really? wrote:
mordacious1 wrote: That's not the way I heard it. Becky brings out condoms, Morman guy doesn't think two of those will be enough and hands Becky a toothbrush. :o
Much more disturbing is that some of the women and men in the audience are laughing. That skeptical audience doesn't seem to think that safe sex and respecting a partner's boundaries are things.
I also get from this vid that she is basically a failed stand-up comedian. Just like Two-cows (who he?) who gave up stand-up after complaining he had to explain his jokes. In short, they are staggeringly boring IRL, which they are convinced doesn't comport with the Carlinesque performance inside their own realities,
Plus the laughter was very light meaning either:
1. There was a poor audience, all of whom were rolling in the aisles, or;
2. There was a large audience, very few of whom thought what she said was funny, or;
3. Something in between.

In any case, I think this shows she's about as funny as a napalm attack, and just as welcome.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3416

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Old_ones wrote:If anyone wants to listen to Mykeru ramble for ramble for a really long time about... something or other... this now exists:

[youtube]uBGTal4qsm0[/youtube]
Christ, that was ten minutes of hard work. Maybe it got better, but I doubt it. As someone said recently, this kind of character needs to be poked and prodded into producing their best work. Left to themselves, they just get lazy. Reading/listening to an angry man describing his phone calls to Meyers's employer, or goading Opheliar, and teasing him about his ill-advised attempts to monetize his schtick in a forum which mocks Surly Amy, is funny. But channeling Michael Savage in a YouTube AMA is just sad. Really. I feel sad now for Mykeru, and that is a weird feeling. Like wondering about how Ophie got that droopy eyelid: you know you shouldn't care, and you definitely should just ignore it, but an obsessive part of you wonders: why? How?

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3417

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

mordacious1 wrote:
John D wrote:*snip*

[youtube]rXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]
That's not the way I heard it. Becky brings out condoms, Morman guy doesn't think two of those will be enough and hands Becky a toothbrush. :o
The most disturbing part was this, just after revealing that they were naked in the same bed and things were progressing:
We have now passed what I like to call "the point of no return".
Hypocritical little cunt.

comhcinc
.
.
Posts: 10835
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:59 am
Location: from Parts Unknown
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3418

Post by comhcinc »

John D wrote:I feel happy that "Reginald" escaped this harpie. Can you imagine having sex with a woman as cruel and self-centered as Becci?

1) Becci goes out with a guy who is ex-Moromon and is probably not very experienced
2) Becci and ex-Mormon are back at her place and they are about to round home plate
3) Becci pulls out condoms but ex-Mormon asks if she is on bc because he thinks a condom is not enough
Side Note: condoms do fail. Becci... please read about the failure rate of a condom
4) Becci is not on any "additional" bc and insists sex with her is safe
5) Ex-Mormon thinks about this dilemma for a while... and then finally decided it is okay to have sex
....whereby...
Becci tells him to "Get the fuck out of my apartment!"

What a nice person she is.

Please also note how objectifying she is of "Reginald's" appearance. She even congratulates herself on her score.

After I watched this video I fully realized what an evil harpy she is. I mean... what kind of person finds this story to be funny?

[youtuberXFKTekTUxo[/youtube]

I didn't get a lot of sleep last night. My youngest had issues and I stayed up with her watching Star Trek. This is pretty normal for us since the break up but anyway. I crashed early tonight and just work up with really bad heart burn.

So I watch this video. That's bad. It's not a good story. She laughs at her self way too much. It doesn't really have a point and it's not funny.

Old_ones
.
.
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:46 pm
Location: An hour's drive from Hell.
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3419

Post by Old_ones »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Old_ones wrote:If anyone wants to listen to Mykeru ramble for ramble for a really long time about... something or other... this now exists:

[youtube]uBGTal4qsm0[/youtube]
Christ, that was ten minutes of hard work. Maybe it got better, but I doubt it. As someone said recently, this kind of character needs to be poked and prodded into producing their best work. Left to themselves, they just get lazy. Reading/listening to an angry man describing his phone calls to Meyers's employer, or goading Opheliar, and teasing him about his ill-advised attempts to monetize his schtick in a forum which mocks Surly Amy, is funny. But channeling Michael Savage in a YouTube AMA is just sad. Really. I feel sad now for Mykeru, and that is a weird feeling. Like wondering about how Ophie got that droopy eyelid: you know you shouldn't care, and you definitely should just ignore it, but an obsessive part of you wonders: why? How?
I listened to it all the way through. It kind of turned into a video about how Dawkins getting deplatformed, but it never got any less convoluted. He had to piss on every SJW we've talked about here in the last few years along the way and then wrap the whole thing up by re-explaining the rules of dealing with SJWs and what SJWSs are and on and on and on.

He's still funny sometimes, but I'm getting kind of concerned that the Twitter ban blew a fuse of some kind. He's been going off the rails.

NoGodsEver
.
.
Posts: 1202
Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 1:05 am
Location: Pacific NW
Contact:

Re: The Refuge of the Toads

#3420

Post by NoGodsEver »

welch wrote:She reminds me of the kid in my last programming class that I almost defenestrated. Every class, EVERY class, he would ask some vaguely related but not really question designed only to demonstrate how fucking clever he was.
I love the delicious irony that these two sentences create together.

Locked