If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

Git wrote:Was reading the pit on my phone earlier whilst having a shit, and I wasn't logged in. Seeing the same old masturbatory hate-filled shite from VickyCaramel (blocked when logged in) wasn't pretty.

People like her will *always* come up with reasons to justify their judenhass

[img]

maher.jpg

[/img]

The difference this time however is that Jews can and do defend themselves. And have learned to be good at it.

piginthecity wrote:

Dave wrote: How badly to you have to piss off your priest/imam/minister/whatever that your penance is to try and convert a bunch of shit-talking atheists?

I don't think that this Jim is here for punishment. More for practice.

Jim's lot (and by this I mean both Bahais and freelance woo-mongers of the "many paths one god" variety) seek to practice the technique of disagreement-by-agreement.

The idea is to say to a rival religionist "Yes, you're absolutely right." Then proceed to explain why everyone else is also "absolutely right" and to leave the poor schmuck to draw the inevitable conclusion that the Bahai (or woo-monger) is the rightiest of all. And that therefore despite being "absolutely right" all the other religions are actually completely wrong.

What Jim is trying to do, is once he's settled on where abouts to start his thread, obtained all the necessary permits, permissions and approvals and crowdsourced the title, is to, within the hallowed halls of the special thread, tell us that we, atheists of the slymepit are all absolutely right and correct and our chosen path is as valid a path to the manifestation of the one true god as any other, and the proof of this is that he, Jim, bestows his seal of approval on us on behalf of Bob McBab of the Baobabs or whoever.

Hence Mission Accomplished !

VickyCaramel wrote:

Git wrote:Was reading the pit on my phone earlier whilst having a shit, and I wasn't logged in. Seeing the same old masturbatory hate-filled shite from VickyCaramel (blocked when logged in) wasn't pretty.

People like her will *always* come up with reasons to justify their judenhass

[img]

maher.jpg

[/img]

The difference this time however is that Jews can and do defend themselves. And have learned to be good at it.

So the Jews having had enough of being pushed around by the Germans, armed themselves with American army surplus and marched off to the middle east to defend themselves against the unarmed Palestinians.

I suspect git gets text alerts when somebody badmouths Israel.

Cunning Punt wrote:Oh look, Git's back. Who'd have thought.

Ericb wrote:

Git wrote:Was reading the pit on my phone earlier whilst having a shit, and I wasn't logged in. Seeing the same old masturbatory hate-filled shite from VickyCaramel (blocked when logged in) wasn't pretty.

People like her will *always* come up with reasons to justify their judenhass

[img]

maher.jpg

[/img]

The difference this time however is that Jews can and do defend themselves. And have learned to be good at it.

I was wondering if you had some kind of Bat Phone that sounds the alarm when someone here starts talking about Israel/Palestine.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Don't care, he's on my ignore list since 12:30 pm GMT+1. All better now.

piginthecity wrote:

Dave wrote: How badly to you have to piss off your priest/imam/minister/whatever that your penance is to try and convert a bunch of shit-talking atheists?

I don't think that this Jim is here for punishment. More for practice.

Jim's lot (and by this I mean both Bahais and freelance woo-mongers of the "many paths one god" variety) seek to practice the technique of disagreement-by-agreement.

The idea is to say to a rival religionist "Yes, you're absolutely right." Then proceed to explain why everyone else is also "absolutely right" and to leave the poor schmuck to draw the inevitable conclusion that the Bahai (or woo-monger) is the rightiest of all. And that therefore despite being "absolutely right" all the other religions are actually completely wrong.

What Jim is trying to do, is once he's settled on where abouts to start his thread, obtained all the necessary permits, permissions and approvals and crowdsourced the title, is to, within the hallowed halls of the special thread, tell us that we, atheists of the slymepit are all absolutely right and correct and our chosen path is as valid a path to the manifestation of the one true god as any other, and the proof of this is that he, Jim, bestows his seal of approval on us on behalf of Bob McBab of the Baobabs or whoever.

Hence Mission Accomplished !

deLurch wrote:

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Don't care, he's on my ignore list since 12:30 pm GMT+1. All better now.

Pardon me Phil. I am interested in posting about my newest community building. The Hall of Justice. It is a place for everyone in the community come meet and discuss philosophy. A place wear drug dealers, the homeless, Parcheesi players and the gravitationally challenged are all welcome.
http://i.imgur.com/HDToHyl.jpg

John D wrote:

deLurch wrote:

John D wrote:This looks like an opportunity for us. Let's pool our money together and buy this. I think we may be able to Jew the guy down a bit to get a better price. (I know we can't afford a Tiger tank, so this may be the next best thing).

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/milita ... rs4x4.html

What on earth would we do with the thing? Historical pieces are meant to be displayed, but any attempt to display that car would most likely be met with attempts to destroy it. Maybe a WWII war museum, but public museums might not want to take the PR risk on their reputation. Maybe a holocaust museum might be able to handle it, but that is about it. Beyond that, the only other hope is a private collection for a WWII buff. I personally am not interested in buying something that cannot be viewed and will collect dust.

Yea... I agree... what I really want is a Tiger tank. :P

Git wrote:

Cunning Punt wrote:Oh look, Git's back. Who'd have thought.

I'm always here.

Usually others say things much better than I ever could. So I've generally nothing to add except hugs.

Kirbmarc wrote:

deLurch wrote:

jet_lagg wrote:If you can find a person here who doesn't believe religion is an actual threat to our species, I'd be shocked.

I don't believe religion intrinsically is a threat to our species.

I believe that religion is a threat to our species when it's given any amount of political or social power.

Private metaphysical speculations about the nature of reality or morality are largely harmless, just like astrology as a private hobby is largely harmless.

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

Clarence wrote:

VickyCaramel wrote:

Git wrote:Was reading the pit on my phone earlier whilst having a shit, and I wasn't logged in. Seeing the same old masturbatory hate-filled shite from VickyCaramel (blocked when logged in) wasn't pretty.

People like her will *always* come up with reasons to justify their judenhass

[img]

maher.jpg

[/img]

The difference this time however is that Jews can and do defend themselves. And have learned to be good at it.

So the Jews having had enough of being pushed around by the Germans, armed themselves with American army surplus and marched off to the middle east to defend themselves against the unarmed Palestinians.

I suspect git gets text alerts when somebody badmouths Israel.

Though I'm probably more on Git's side than yours concerning Israel and the retardation of many of her ME haterz, I must admit this is funny as hell and probably true.

jet_lagg wrote:jimhabegger, if that really is why you are here, recruitment, you couldn't have chosen a worse forum. True, we mostly debate whatever comes up on a given day and laugh at SJWs, but everyone here is coming from a hard stance atheist/skeptic background. We're not just the sort of people who casually disbelieve. We're actively hostile to the idea. If you can find a person here who doesn't believe religion is an actual threat to our species, I'd be shocked.

MarcusAu wrote:

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

no comment

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Would you accept me as Captain Danger, The One Who Hurts?

deLurch wrote:

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Don't care, he's on my ignore list since 12:30 pm GMT+1. All better now.

Pardon me Phil. I am interested in posting about my newest community building. The Hall of Justice. It is a place for everyone in the community come meet and discuss philosophy. A place wear drug dealers, the homeless, Parcheesi players and the gravitationally challenged are all welcome.
http://i.imgur.com/HDToHyl.jpg

deLurch wrote:

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Would you accept me as Captain Danger, The One Who Hurts?

Sure, just make sure you dress appropriately with the head cone. I can't afford to have you licking yourself while we study the writings of Kal-El. You must also accept the Aquaman can fly.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

deLurch wrote:

John D wrote:This looks like an opportunity for us. Let's pool our money together and buy this. I think we may be able to Jew the guy down a bit to get a better price. (I know we can't afford a Tiger tank, so this may be the next best thing).

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/milita ... rs4x4.html

What on earth would we do with the thing? Historical pieces are meant to be displayed, but any attempt to display that car would most likely be met with attempts to destroy it. Maybe a WWII war museum, but public museums might not want to take the PR risk on their reputation. Maybe a holocaust museum might be able to handle it, but that is about it. Beyond that, the only other hope is a private collection for a WWII buff. I personally am not interested in buying something that cannot be viewed and will collect dust.

[youtube]41imMO7XpFg[/youtube]

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

MarcusAu wrote:

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

no comment

Comment: have you seen the rent prices in London?!? Fuck's sake, even my well earning friends are lucky enough to live in a cupboard, how could they manage hosting Alex's humongous schnoze.

deLurch wrote:

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Would you accept me as Captain Danger, The One Who Hurts?

Sure, just make sure you dress appropriately with the head cone. I can't afford to have you licking yourself while we study the writings of Kal-El. You must also accept the Aquaman can fly.

Git wrote:Total number of people killed over a 100-odd years or so in the "Arab-Israeli" conflict: 60k or so.
Number of Muslims killed by other Muslims in the same time for being the wrong type of Muslim: up to ten million.
But if its not Jews, its not news of course.

VickyCaramel wrote:Can somebody tell git that rather that typing out all that bullshit, he could link to Christian-fundamentalist websites that are still pushing Zionist propaganda from the 1930s.

Git wrote:It is the Arabs that are solely prolonging the conflict, largely prolonged by the victim complex of Islam.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war ... s-book.gif

dogen wrote:
Apparently, the Joos made the Carribean disappear. Oy vey!

deLurch wrote:

Git wrote:Total number of people killed over a 100-odd years or so in the "Arab-Israeli" conflict: 60k or so.
Number of Muslims killed by other Muslims in the same time for being the wrong type of Muslim: up to ten million.
But if its not Jews, its not news of course.

Not that I necessarily disagree with your other points, but on this one, the population of Israel is about 8.3 million. The population of the Middle East as a whole is 411.5 million.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_M ... population

Are you sure your comparison still holds up?

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war ... s-book.gif

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

John D wrote:Oh man! Haha. Now I want that Himmler truck more than ever.

Shatterface wrote:

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

Doesn't he have a mother or grandmother he can stay with?

Here's hoping for snow over Easter.

John D wrote:

deLurch wrote:

John D wrote:This looks like an opportunity for us. Let's pool our money together and buy this. I think we may be able to Jew the guy down a bit to get a better price. (I know we can't afford a Tiger tank, so this may be the next best thing).

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/milita ... rs4x4.html

What on earth would we do with the thing? Historical pieces are meant to be displayed, but any attempt to display that car would most likely be met with attempts to destroy it. Maybe a WWII war museum, but public museums might not want to take the PR risk on their reputation. Maybe a holocaust museum might be able to handle it, but that is about it. Beyond that, the only other hope is a private collection for a WWII buff. I personally am not interested in buying something that cannot be viewed and will collect dust.

Yea... I agree... what I really want is a Tiger tank. :P

John D wrote:This looks like an opportunity for us. Let's pool our money together and buy this. I think we may be able to Jew the guy down a bit to get a better price. (I know we can't afford a Tiger tank, so this may be the next best thing).

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/milita ... rs4x4.html

VickyCaramel wrote:
Zionism : (Tziyonut, after Zion) is a nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land... very roughly.... although some of the fundamentalist settlers think it should look more like this:-

nationalist and political

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:

Shatterface wrote:

d4m10n wrote:Any Londeners hereabouts?

Doesn't he have a mother or grandmother he can stay with?

Here's hoping for snow over Easter.

Oooh, frozen shrimp!

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

VickyCaramel wrote:
Zionism : (Tziyonut, after Zion) is a nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land... very roughly.... although some of the fundamentalist settlers think it should look more like this:-

nationalist and political

The part of Zionism you forget to mention (and which is very relevant to anti-Zionist Jews as well) is that the kingdom of Israel (Zion) must be heralded by the coming of the Jewish messiah, hence religious. It's a notion that doesn't seem to be present in modern Israeli politics. If it is, please correct me.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

VickyCaramel wrote:
Zionism : (Tziyonut, after Zion) is a nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land... very roughly.... although some of the fundamentalist settlers think it should look more like this:-

nationalist and political

The part of Zionism you forget to mention (and which is very relevant to anti-Zionist Jews as well) is that the kingdom of Israel (Zion) must be heralded by the coming of the Jewish messiah, hence religious. It's a notion that doesn't seem to be present in modern Israeli politics. If it is, please correct me.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

VickyCaramel wrote:
Zionism : (Tziyonut, after Zion) is a nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land... very roughly.... although some of the fundamentalist settlers think it should look more like this:-

nationalist and political

The part of Zionism you forget to mention (and which is very relevant to anti-Zionist Jews as well) is that the kingdom of Israel (Zion) must be heralded by the coming of the Jewish messiah, hence religious. It's a notion that doesn't seem to be present in modern Israeli politics. If it is, please correct me.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:

VickyCaramel wrote:
Zionism : (Tziyonut, after Zion) is a nationalist and political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel, roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land... very roughly.... although some of the fundamentalist settlers think it should look more like this:-

nationalist and political

The part of Zionism you forget to mention (and which is very relevant to anti-Zionist Jews as well) is that the kingdom of Israel (Zion) must be heralded by the coming of the Jewish messiah, hence religious. It's a notion that doesn't seem to be present in modern Israeli politics. If it is, please correct me.

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Would you accept me as Captain Danger, The One Who Hurts?

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Fuck it, I don't know. I'm just stating what I know about it, without recourse to online resources. So if I was wrong all along, I'll admit it. But I seem to remember the Messiah/Zion argument from some very orthodox, very anti-zionist Jews. Maybe they lied.

Clarence wrote: Looky here! We got ourselves a GEN YOU WINE blank-slater! ;) :P

Whilst I tend to agree with you, I tend to think that religion is based on innate human impulses and, as such, it is impossible to construct a society where some sort of religion doesn't have social power at least.

Heck, that's what the SJW religion (ostensibly secular, after all) is all about ! Social Status signalling.

Spike13 wrote: According to my Catholic upbringing he came and went already.

But then again it also told me that the Pope was infallible, except when he was royally fucking up.....

Greg Brown, in Brand New 64 Dodge wrote:And Jesus loves our president, even though he is a Catholic.

MarcusAu wrote:

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Would you accept me as Captain Danger, The One Who Hurts?

I'm not sure who Captain Danger is - but I could definitely see you as Captain Scarlet

[youtube]bV8YbLvGrb0[/youtube]

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Fuck it, I don't know. I'm just stating what I know about it, without recourse to online resources. So if I was wrong all along, I'll admit it. But I seem to remember the Messiah/Zion argument from some very orthodox, very anti-zionist Jews. Maybe they lied.

VickyCaramel wrote: The vast majority of the worlds Zionists these days...

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Fuck it, I don't know. I'm just stating what I know about it, without recourse to online resources. So if I was wrong all along, I'll admit it. But I seem to remember the Messiah/Zion argument from some very orthodox, very anti-zionist Jews. Maybe they lied.