Kirbmarc wrote:Today I've met the Swiss Steersman. A guy on the train who was arguing for the deportation of all Muslims unless they swear on the Bible.
I do get all the crazies.
Our name is legion; first the Pit, then the world. Mwhahaaa ....
But while I wouldn't go as far as that guy - and I've had dead silence from some Twitter interlocutors when I've suggested some Christian sects are as bad as Muslim ones - you might consider, as hard as I know it is for you to think outside the box, that there's more than a little justification for the position. Consider this
recent article in the Washington Post:
BERLIN — A contentious deal struck Friday between the European Union and Turkey aims to finally halt the historic wave of irregular migration to Europe from the Middle East and beyond. But Germany, ground zero of the refugee crisis, faces a separate problem — what to do about all those who are already here.
The rapid rate of arrivals in the once-welcoming nation has forced a backlog of 770,000 asylum requests. About half of them, authorities say, will be rejected. That means figuring out how to get the asylum seekers who cannot stay to leave. With deportations on such a scale seen as problematic at best, the country has come up with a solution: Pay — some say bribe — them.
Bloody joke to think that they're going to repudiate their rather barbaric religion, and won't be an expensive and dangerous thorn in the side of Germany and other EU countries - a poisoned chalice writ large.
But while I agreed with your earlier comments about metaphors and analogies, I'm not sure that you are really willing to consider that you too may have, probably do have, any number of highly questionable assumptions, not just on the question of Islam, but on many other issues. And speaking of analogies, I wonder whether you and others here play Sudoku, and know that sometimes one simply has to make an assumption, a guess, as to a possibility and then see where the dust settles: there are simply no algorithms that are going to cover every case; one is sort of obliged to go on faith - so to speak. But the trick is to realize that one is making an assumption and to then be prepared to backtrack, to abandon them, if one comes to a contradiction of sorts. Those interested in that analogy might take a gander at
this paper for a start, particularly chapter 12 on forcing functions.