The Refuge of the Toads

#66481

Shatterface wrote:

Yes, Dr Rutherford, but why don't you tell us what you really think? :D

#66482

deLurch wrote: I find I am not as mad at her, but pity her, because an adult woman shouldn't have to deal with this in the US.

Enjoy watching her original interview again.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/12/03/ ... on-subway/

She lied once and heavily played a stereotype for sympathy. What makes you think she is telling the truth now, instead of playing another stereotype for sympathy?

Also note, that she is no longer wearing her hijab as she did for her sympathy interview.[/quote]

The shaved head is a public display of her shame. Her parents are pretty liberal all things considered. Still, that could change.

#66483

I think it would break Latsot's heart to discover you weren't the only one he trolled. You slut.

#66484

rayshul wrote:I think it would break Latsot's heart to discover you weren't the only one he trolled. You slut.

If it's PZ then it's OK.

#66485

jet_lagg wrote:Kurt Eichenwald is going full consequences will never be the same over that tweet that allegedly gave him a seizure.
[.tweet][/tweet]
[.tweet][/tweet]
[.tweet][/tweet]
[.tweet][/tweet]

Note to Twittertwats: that medium is not for essays. Try a blog.

#66486

rayshul wrote:I think it would break Latsot's heart to discover you weren't the only one he trolled. You slut.

The rest are just sex.

#66487

jet_lagg wrote:Kurt Eichenwald is going full consequences will never be the same over that tweet that allegedly gave him a seizure.

Is it not commonly understood that users are not merely anonymous to other users but to the platform as well? What's interesting is he says this is the second time someone has done this to him, which begs the question of why he didn't try to press charges the first time, and why he didn't turn off the fucking autoplay function.

Intentionally sending a flashing graphic to someone you know who is epileptic is a pretty dick move.

But I also strongly agree with the point that this has happened to him before, and it appears he has done nothing to prevent it from recurring on his own computer.

#66488

Fucking Obama. Trying to start WW3 just because Trump won.
[youtube][/youtube]

#66489

Latsot: I got a shock because my cat attacked my neck. As cats do.

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/arch ... 34695a.jpg

:lol: :lol: :lol:

#66490

[youtube][/youtube]

#66491

Kirbmarc wrote: I have to agree. A population of animals of that size would leave much more evidence behind than sounds of undetermined origin and hair which cannot be reliably identified.

You just don't get it Kirbmarc. Every sound for which you cannot prove the origin with certainty must be made by a bigfoot. Likewise any hair with insufficient DNA to identify it is certainly bigfoot's hair.

#66492

Kirbmarc wrote:
Shatterface wrote:Here's Fuller's response to the Sokal Hoax:

http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/fuller.html

Fullershit
The cunt cites himself as an authority. He's the bizarro Richard Carrier.

This Steve Fuller was one of the creationist side expert witnesses at the Dover trial. He was one of the (I think two) who actually turned up and didn't bail.

Eugenie Scott said something like "If there was one witness our side wanted to turn up for the creationists, it was him."

#66493

Today I had good friend loose their rag and a bit and call me a red pill guy.

Why you ask?

For pointing out that SJW has become a commonplace pejorative in response to over-zealous reactions on-line.

I also mad pains to point out that this was no comment on rights issues (like most folk here I have no problem with any of the goals of social justice, just the given ideology) but I guess I have Wrong Opinions and and one of The Bad People.

Why are folks like this?

#66494

free thoughtpolice wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

That's in the vicinity of a Luther. Maybe Bigfoot died out because of cardiovascular disease.

#66495

Anyone seen the new NatGeo cover yet?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzypeFAXgAALvqd.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

#66496

Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

#66497

Boodleoops is furious, natch.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

#66498

d4m10n wrote:Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

OMG Misogyny!

#66499

Well you can't have a woman on the cover otherwise it might offend Muslims. Even to use the word 'erasure' would be islamophobic.

Anyway, why two transwomen? Do they outnumber men two-to-one?

Plus they call the dude 'male' instead of 'cis-male'. That's hate speech or something. I am so triggered right now I am literally crying and shaking.

#66500

*spit*

#66501

d4m10n wrote:Anyone seen the new NatGeo cover yet?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzypeFAXgAALvqd.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Yay, Murdoch.

This is the cover I saw yesterday. Are they using both?

http://imgur.com/qVc67W8.jpg

#66502

This might finally make Benson go postal.

I'd suggest avoiding coffee shops in her vicinity.

#66503

d4m10n wrote:Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?

Trump?

#66504

Dress up your own little boy as a girl and you are a progressive parent; dress up someone else's and they'll quietly transfer you to another parish.

#66505

Warmongering Trump.

https://i.redditmedia.com/GDnRfvXktrrvg ... 6a989c0dff

#66506

Ape+lust wrote:
d4m10n wrote:Anyone seen the new NatGeo cover yet?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzypeFAXgAALvqd.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Yay, Murdoch.

This is the cover I saw yesterday. Are they using both?

http://imgur.com/qVc67W8.jpg

They are using both, but I don't know which regions are seeing each.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

#66507

d4m10n wrote:Anyone seen the new NatGeo cover yet?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzypeFAXgAALvqd.jpg

Kinda makes you think that ISIS has a point about the need to destroy Western civilization. /jk

#66508

Suet Cardigan wrote:I'd just like to say good luck to Abbie in her new career as a fantasy art model:

Boris Vallejo & Julie Bell 2001 - 07.jpg

BWAHAHA! Oh man I wish!

It hasnt come to that, yet, though-- sci stuff is going really, really well :)

#66509

Shatterface wrote:
d4m10n wrote:Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?
Trump?

Let's see.
* Muscato <-Woman
* Strong Celebrated Pedophile Hero
* Female (But if they added that like they did Male then all the SJWs would have a Frengi-upset)
* Toddler-kin (Stefonknee)
* Trans-racial (Elfwick, Sean King, Rachel)

#66510

d4m10n wrote:Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?

Someone with a job?

#66511

Ape+lust wrote:Yay, Murdoch.

This is the cover I saw yesterday. Are they using both?

At least they made the other cover nice & shoopable.

#66512

[youtube][/youtube]

#66513

Shatterface wrote:
d4m10n wrote:Anyone seem to be ostentatiously missing from this picture?
Someone with a job?

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5288/5288 ... 7b60_z.jpg

#66514

deLurch wrote: Kinda makes you think that ISIS has a point about the need to destroy Western civilization. /jk

Too late!

#66515

DrokkIt wrote:Today I had good friend loose their rag and a bit and call me a red pill guy.

Why you ask?

For pointing out that SJW has become a commonplace pejorative in response to over-zealous reactions on-line.

I also mad pains to point out that this was no comment on rights issues (like most folk here I have no problem with any of the goals of social justice, just the given ideology) but I guess I have Wrong Opinions and and one of The Bad People.

Why are folks like this?

This exchange actually has me quite down. :cry:

#66516

The NatGeo cover is a bunch of people who are not half as interesting as they seem to think they are.

I'm sure that it could be placed in context by comparing it to covers of years past - the hippies in the 1960's come to mind.

I think they might find changing society is not quite as easy as they are hoping. And this revolution (if that's what it is) seems trivial in comparison to others.

Is it silly season where everyone's about to go on holiday - and it was a slow news week?

#66517

Shatterface wrote:Dress up your own little boy as a girl and you are a progressive parent; dress up someone else's and they'll quietly transfer you to another parish.

x6

#66518

DrokkIt wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:Today I had good friend loose their rag and a bit and call me a red pill guy.

Why you ask?

For pointing out that SJW has become a commonplace pejorative in response to over-zealous reactions on-line.

I also mad pains to point out that this was no comment on rights issues (like most folk here I have no problem with any of the goals of social justice, just the given ideology) but I guess I have Wrong Opinions and and one of The Bad People.

Why are folks like this?

This exchange actually has me quite down. :cry:

Since it's a good friend, I'd assume you caught him or her at the wrong time. On a bad day I've said the worst shit to friends of mine and they've said the worst shit to me. A single blow up isn't worth worrying about much. Let it go and hopefully things get back to normal. This advice is coming from an anonymous internet asshole, so take it for what it's worth.

Politics, sports, and religion are great ways to divide ourselves into arbitrary teams and hate each other. People love that shit. I stick to hating people over sports, there is less chance of bloodshed.

#66519

free thoughtpolice wrote:[youtube][/youtube]

Rumor has it, one of the three is faking. Which do you think that it is?

#66520

John D wrote:My pupper is hardy to about 18 degrees Fahrenheit. But, at 6 degrees he just stands on the driveway... thus.... 6 degrees means booties and a sweater.
15542187_1161571120564122_4833568166396973328_n.jpg

Does he do the 'pupper with boots on' hysterical walk?

#66521

Billie from Ockham wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:[youtube][/youtube]
Rumor has it, one of the three is faking. Which do you think that it is?

The one with the long dark hair appears to flushing red, looks pretty real to me, the light haired one is moving realistically.
I vote the brown haired gal is faking it.

#66522

Mr. X, Indeed wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:Today I had good friend loose their rag and a bit and call me a red pill guy.

Why you ask?

For pointing out that SJW has become a commonplace pejorative in response to over-zealous reactions on-line.

I also mad pains to point out that this was no comment on rights issues (like most folk here I have no problem with any of the goals of social justice, just the given ideology) but I guess I have Wrong Opinions and and one of The Bad People.

Why are folks like this?

This exchange actually has me quite down. :cry:
Since it's a good friend, I'd assume you caught him or her at the wrong time. On a bad day I've said the worst shit to friends of mine and they've said the worst shit to me. A single blow up isn't worth worrying about much. Let it go and hopefully things get back to normal. This advice is coming from an anonymous internet asshole, so take it for what it's worth.

Politics, sports, and religion are great ways to divide ourselves into arbitrary teams and hate each other. People love that shit. I stick to hating people over sports, there is less chance of bloodshed.

Thanks, good advice.
It can, and frequently does, feel quite isolating when virtually everyone around you is bought into a closed mentality. This person knows me well, and knows I'm not a right winger (not that there is anything wrong with being that) so it did seem pretty harsh and judgemental.

I did sort of prove my point though, complete intolerance.

#66523

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:from that UPI article:

"It appears China is intent on transforming these features into operational bases that will allow its military to project power and assert control of one of the most vital international waterways," said Arizona Sen. John McCain. "This is unacceptable."
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/751/20820 ... fcfe_b.jpg
It's not just the US that is worried here. The Philippines and other nations also claim waters that China is building up. Not sure the USA is trying to control international waterways for its sovereign use.

I don't think they are. But they/we were perfectly happy when nobody else was in a position to send a Nimitz-class type carrier, when we/they could if we/they wanted to.

#66524

DaveDodo007 wrote:
NoGodsEver wrote:New rule: anyone who is fooled by Clinton has no right to question anyone else's intelligence.
TFIFY.

Fuck me the Dems are going into full meltdown and you wanted them in charge of the country.

She's now officially claiming it woz the Russkies and the FBItards wot won it!

#66525

So there's a discussion on KiA about animation, and apparently the SJW author mentioned something about Disney's infamous ink and paint girls (that for approximately half its life, Disney didn't allow women as animators and would only hire them to work in ink and paint). Naturally, because an SJW said it, there was pushback, but in this specific instance it was wrongheaded because they're completely correct. Some idiots even trotted out the "times was different back then" defense not knowing that this was very much a Disney-specific problem (the arts, after all, tend to be more liberal than mainstream society). Fleischer studios had women animators in the 1920s, and for a period they were bigger than Disney and lead the industry.

What was funniest to me though was someone trotting out a defense that I've seen Karen Straughan use before, which was that owing to the nature of society back then, with men as breadwinners, it was wrong to give a woman a job at the expense of man.

Thing is, Straughan used this argument to explain the "mysoginy" of Middle Eastern craphole economies where high unemployment is a rule. It doesn't work at all in Western liberal democracies where economics is far from zero sum (any conservative economist would have called bullshit on that). Shit, I thought the official anti-PC position which I was all in favor of was hiring the best person for the job regardless, but fuck these retards if they're just going to go SJW in reverse.

#66526

I keep spelling misogyny incorrectly. Truly a shitlord am I.

#66527

Lsuoma wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
NoGodsEver wrote:New rule: anyone who is fooled by Clinton has no right to question anyone else's intelligence.
TFIFY.

Fuck me the Dems are going into full meltdown and you wanted them in charge of the country.
She's now officially claiming it woz the Russkies and the FBItards wot won it!

Next thing you know she'll be questioning his birth certificate.

#66528

deLurch wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:Yay, Murdoch.

This is the cover I saw yesterday. Are they using both?
At least they made the other cover nice & shoopable.

They did :D

http://imgur.com/Qd6pmwO.jpg

#66529

'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

#66530

jet_lagg wrote:Aneris, have you read Film Crit Hulk's essay The Force Alluded To? The guy can be an insufferable SJW half the time, but I've always enjoyed his ideas on film. As a fellow Star Wars geek he nails everything that's wrong with Abrams' version, and points out many of the same issues that you've noted.

I've been hearing a lot of good things about Rogue One. I had planned to skip it based on the trailer and just how tedious Edwards' other films can be, but might go this weekend after all.

Never heard of the Crit Hulk and an odd persona to write reviews with, in all caps and third person, though he nails it indeed. There seems to be a few people now who notice JJ Abrams weird talent that is rather dangerous, in a sense. He seems to deliver a good film, which is entertaining, but has actually destroyed everything in the process, with empty characters that have no motivation or emotions, just attitudes and facial expression. So he gets invited again and again, yet wrecks havoc. As long as he does it stand-alone films, the damage is limited, but allow him to direct something in an established franchise and he can destroy much more in the process — as he did in Star Wars and Star Trek.

#66531

Tigzy wrote:'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

The Scat Channel obviously isn't paying its way.

#66532

KiwiInOz wrote:
Tigzy wrote:'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

The Scat Channel obviously isn't paying its way.

When I consider the likes of Elyse, Becky & FTB, I can't help but think that 'being on the right side of history' would surely be at least a little more financially profitable.

#66533

Laffing My FukenAss Off!

I was not going to bother watching this, but I am glad I did after all.

‘Nobody Is Getting Fooled!’: Face-Off Between Tucker Carlson, Newsweek Writer Goes Off the Rails

Fuken Hilarious!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

#66534

Tigzy wrote:'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

Are there no prisons, no workhouses? If they rather die, then better they do so & decrease the surplus population.

#66535

BUMBUG!

#66536

Has anyone let Becs or the Skepchicks know of Elyse's dire situation?

#66537

Service Dog wrote:
Tigzy wrote:'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

Are there no prisons, no workhouses? If they rather die, then better they do so & decrease the surplus population.

Compliments of the season to you too SD.

#66538

DrokkIt wrote:
DrokkIt wrote:Today I had good friend loose their rag and a bit and call me a red pill guy.

Why you ask?

For pointing out that SJW has become a commonplace pejorative in response to over-zealous reactions on-line.

I also mad pains to point out that this was no comment on rights issues (like most folk here I have no problem with any of the goals of social justice, just the given ideology) but I guess I have Wrong Opinions and and one of The Bad People.

Why are folks like this?

This exchange actually has me quite down. :cry:

I've been attacked by friends from both ends. It's very bad.

Guest_935516df · #66539

Tigzy wrote:'Brian Anders-Wojnowski
on behalf of Elyse Wojnowski-Anders'

That's about the story of your life, ain't it Brian.

I'm not paying for her legal fees.

-Soylent

Guest_935516df · #66540

ROBOKiTTY wrote:I've been attacked by friends from both ends. It's very bad.

A spit-roast? That sounds very bad indeed.
-Soylent