Happy 3rd Pit Birthday!

#43801

Oh and nothing is going to be said about Grizzly Adams dying?

That bear that post here must be completely tore up.

#43802

Kirbmarc wrote: The Quran is a book with many different interpretations. Moderate Sunni or Shia intepret it differently from Wahabites and Salafites. Theocratic Iranian Shia are very different from moderate Sufis. Liberal muslims like Maajid Nawaz are on a completely different page from degenerates like Anjem Choudary.

It's pretty amazing that a book which states unequivocally (despite the muslim handwaving) that one can actually go 'to the setting place of the sun' and observe it as it 'sets into a pool of murky water' can be taken by so many as the absolute and final word of god. Crazy old world, I guess.

#43803

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:

There's no evidence.

Of course Giliell knows that evidence is a social construct, so she's constructing it socially.

#43804

Apparently, what Giliell was referring to is this:

Git wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
'It is not the deed that concerns us, Winston - rather, the thought behind it.'

http://www.theshoopsroost.com/2015/12/3 ... mment-6293
* There were c. 1,000 of the goatfuckers;
* 100 of the reports were of sexual assault, there were also many more of mugging;
* If Gilliel could mange to maneuver her 400 lb. girth through her door jam and out onto the street, it'd take 1,000 goatfuckers to assault just her alone.
Or a couple of squadrons of X-wings...

[/quote]

She elaborates here: http://www.theshoopsroost.com/2015/12/3 ... mment-6479 Many hugs are offered to her for the trauma of extrapolating something completely different to what was actually written.

#43805

Tigzy wrote:
Kirbmarc wrote: The Quran is a book with many different interpretations. Moderate Sunni or Shia intepret it differently from Wahabites and Salafites. Theocratic Iranian Shia are very different from moderate Sufis. Liberal muslims like Maajid Nawaz are on a completely different page from degenerates like Anjem Choudary.
It's pretty amazing that a book which states unequivocally (despite the muslim handwaving) that one can actually go 'to the setting place of the sun' and observe it as it 'sets into a pool of murky water' can be taken by so many as the absolute and final word of god. Crazy old world, I guess.

That's modern religion for you. Handwaving over handwaving, rationalization over rationalization, until at there's left is the idiotic pseudo-agnostic "you can't prove it's not true!"

The Bible also says that there was an evening and a morning before there was a sun. Or that there are "portals and windows" in the heaven from which rain falls. Or that God stopped the sun, not the earth. Or that God made manna rain from the sky. Etc.

Yet many peole have taken it (and some people still take it) as the absolute and final word of god.

Until rather recently Christianity was much more similar to Islam than we think. In Southern Italy women veiled their heads until 70 or 80 years ago. The Inquisitions and the Puritans ordered the slaughter of heretics and infidels with methods that weren't much better than what ISIS does.

If Christianity is better than Islam now it's only because of a long process of secularization. The same process started in some Muslim countries in the 50s and the early 60s (Iran, even Afghanistan) but was suffocated by religious revivals, often sponsored by the US against the communists (and anyone who might not have been as easily manipulated as they wished) and now by the Saudi regime.

Turkey was also secularized in the 20s, although Erdogan has been flirting with the conservative islamists for quite a while.

The process of secularization can start again, but we have to get rid of the influence of Saudi Arabia first.

Wahabites and Salafites have been financed by the Saduiand have hindered secularization, promoted anti-Western hatred, incited terrorism and opposed reformation in Islam since the 70s. And yet for years no one has dared to question the role of Saudi Arabia as a Western ally.

Oil trumps democracy, I guess.

#43806

My German is not the best (being that I have never learned the language) but I am pretty sure the sign reads:

My running shoes are surprising warm

http://i.imgur.com/FMRiwXD.jpg

#43807

The Yeti wrote:
cnut the great wrote:
The Yeti wrote:Dr. Ashley Miller, PhD (Honey Boo Boo Studies) becomes the first of the baboons to lash out about the FTB/Skepchick free lineup at the 2016 Reason Rally
PZ rather uncharacteristically de-escalates in the comments. What's his angle?

He seems to be trying to weasel himself in as a last minute addition to the lineup. Notice how he laments the small number of speakers and implied that they need to add more to attract crowds. He also implies that he might have to cancel his trip to the Reason Rally if they don't make the event bigger. Poor PZ doesn't realize that nobody gives a shit if he doesn't go.

He also points out that he'll speak for $0.

#43808

comhcinc wrote:Oh and nothing is going to be said about Grizzly Adams dying?

That bear that post here must be completely tore up.

Well yes I did tear him up. He was delicious. :animals-bear:

#43809

Kirbmarc wrote:
Steersman wrote: <snip>
Yea, well I've also suggested "regulating" Muslim immigration too - through the "means test" of saying "either piss on the Quran or piss off". Time to call a spade a shovel - or maybe you didn't notice that article about Pakistan and the fucking ignorant savages there who refused to ban child marriages because the "Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) declared it un-Islamic"? Fuck 'em. Fuck 'em all.
There are many, many problems with Islam.

They're not going to be dealt with by a simplistic approach like "piss on the Quran or piss off".

It's far better to construct a test along the lines of "accept liberal democracy and its rules or piss off".

Or, as the Muslim mayor of Rotterdam has said after the Charlie Hebdo attack "accept free speech or fuck off".
<snip>

Most of all, though, progressive people have to unambiguously come out against Islamism, stop allying itself with Islamist groups and stop supporting Islamist ideas.

Indeed. Though I don't see a helluva lot of difference between my phrasing and that of that mayor. And I might also suggest that simply telling prospective Muslims the rules of the road is going to be worth diddly squat - particularly when their "holy book" [ha!] and Prophet [piss be upon his name] explicitly condone lying to infidels. While I will readily concede, as you suggest, that there are rational Muslims, more or less, and sects that aren't particularly odious, one might wonder what your plan would be to separate the rather small amount of "wheat" from the much more common and odious "chaff". Somewhat apropos, a recent story - this morning in fact - from Vancouver, B.C., Canada's largest Western city ('towsands and 'towsands of us" ....):

Vancouver Police looking for men spotted filming inside Pacific Centre mall:
Three men spotted using smart phones to take 360-degree video and photos inside a downtown Vancouver mall earlier this week has prompted security concerns and a police investigation. ....

The men are described as Middle Eastern.

One man is seen on security footage wearing a dark-coloured jacket, beige pants, a dark-coloured hat with ear flaps, and sporting light facial hair. ....

No doubt, just some ~~Islamic thugs~~ realtors checking out some properties for their Saudi/Wahhabist ~~overlords~~ clients .... But one might wonder how many more outrages - like 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo and Paris - will it take before you/we consider that Muslims simply don't play well with others, and do something more than wringing your/our hands.

#43810

free thoughtpolice wrote:
comhcinc wrote:Oh and nothing is going to be said about Grizzly Adams dying?

That bear that post here must be completely tore up.
Well yes I did tear him up. He was delicious. :animals-bear:

Tasted of pepper spray? ;-)

#43811

It made the robot comment? I take it back.

#43812

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:

No Gilliel.

We have simply observed that you are a rape apologist, as you seem to be unconcerned about the rape of German women by immigrants.

#43813

another lurker wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:
No Gilliel.

We have simply observed that you are a rape apologist, as you seem to be unconcerned about the rape of German women by immigrants.

Giliell says:
January 15, 2016 at 2:41 AM
Thanks, folks.
Shouldn’t surprise you, right, but fuck…
But it’s quite telling how fascinated those dudes are with “brown hordes raping women”. Kind like a wishful fantasy. If only they could get away with it…

+++
rq
I thought this might interest you.

She's figured us out. Speaking out about rape = rapists in waiting.

#43814

another lurker wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:
No Gilliel.

We have simply observed that you are a rape apologist, as you seem to be unconcerned about the rape of German women by immigrants.

The reason she knows is she was googling the place she is at and we came up instead?

#43815

Forty percent of people in England do not believe Jesus was a real person, a Church of England survey suggests.
However, 43% of the people asked said they did believe in the resurrection - although many did not think it happened as described in the Bible.
The figures found while 57% classified themselves as Christian, fewer than 10% read the Bible and prayed regularly, or go to church at least once a month.
The Church of England's General Synod will discuss the survey in November.
The survey of more than 4,000 people was commissioned by the Church, Hope - which represents churches of all denominations - and the Evangelical Alliance - which represents evangelical Christians in the UK.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34686993?p ... 368111#_=_

Nooooo. What has Carrier done. :shifty:

Guest_0048cc29 · #43816

Same nude chick performing "Plog Egg"

[youtube]wRM_Wyj7elI[/youtube] (NSFB)

#43817

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:

I was under the impression that she has a very tenuous relationship with reality so I am not too sure I would bother to check.

*shrug*

#43818

AndrewV69 wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Giliell, professional cynic -Ilk-

14 January 2016 at 4:22 pm

BTW, I just found out that the totally not misogynists of a totally not hate forum are wishing me to be raped by “1000 goat fuckers”.
Clearly, it must be their atheism, right?
Did that happen here? I must have missed. :think:
I was under the impression that she has a very tenuous relationship with reality so I am not too sure I would bother to check.

*shrug*

She has a very strong connection with pseudo-victimhood and an adversarial relationship with the truth.

#43819

There is a reason that I have kept certain threads open on LJF.

The lulz keep coming in.

This is classic SJW.

Anat BarlowGirl • 30 minutes ago

Is it fatphobic to say that one personally would like to lose weight or is happy for having lost weight themselves? (Is being happy about getting into college or completing one's degree shaming and phobic towards people who for one reason or another chose not to attend college?) We can have different personal goals and celebrate whatever achievements we work hard for - and that doesn't have to be a slight against someone who does not share that goal.

•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
BarlowGirl Anat • 14 minutes ago

"One" does not exist in a vacuum outside of a fatphobic society. You cannot separate wanting to "personally" lose weight from a fatphobic society in which fat is bad and thin is good, and most of the time? Yeah, you do contribute to diet culture. You contribute to the myth that weight loss is possible for the vast majority of people (it's not) and you likely contribute to stereotypes about fat people (Weight loss will make you healthier! You'll have better relationships people if you get thinner! I have to lose weight because I can't do (fitness thing) and the weight loss causes me to be able to do (fitness thing) not increasing my strength/flexibility/stamina).

I will NEVER celebrate weight loss. It is NOT a goood thing. Nor it is a bad thing. Weight loss or gain is not a moral issue. And I will not celebrate a toxic culture that tells people they should try to do something probably very risky to their health that is impossible for most people, and that they're bad for not doing it. I will never celebrate a toxic culture that kills people.

This is the only response you're getting from me. I'm not going to debate Fat Acceptance 101 with you. You can research Fat Acceptance 101 for this crap

#43820

Tigzy wrote:Apparently, what Giliell was referring to is this:
<chop>
She elaborates here: http://www.theshoopsroost.com/2015/12/3 ... mment-6479 Many hugs are offered to her for the trauma of extrapolating something completely different to what was actually written.

Like I said earlier ... I was under the impression that she has a very tenuous relationship with reality. Nor am I surprised that she is also a rape apologist.

#43821

From the Cologne thread:

Composer 99 TheMiddlist • 7 hours ago

Before saying anything else, let me say that I am sorry for what happened to you: it ought not to have happened at all.

-----
With respect to discussing German refugee policy and entrenched sexism among refugees:

It's well and good to suggest or recommend that refugees to Germany coming from polities with entrenched misogyny should be formally educated on better behaviour with respect to sexism, and encouraged to practice that better behaviour. I personally do not disagree with that.

But they will cotton on very quickly that that such education and encouragement is, in effect, a sham when they see the relative impunity with which ethnic Germans practice their own entrenched sexism. If ethnic Germans don't really take sexism seriously, why would refugees?

Hence Libby Anne's argument that more needs to be done, in concert with refugee education, to combat sexism at the societal scale in Germany. You basically can't deal with one without dealing with the other as well.

Yes. Because German men run around raeping German women with impunity. And I imagine that the same happens in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark? They don't get charged with a crime if they rape! This is why refugee men are so successful at it, an will continue to be, even with education, because those damn German men can't keep it in their pants!

#43822

Damien just got threatened with a banning. By the person who banned Lila:

Damion Reinhardt The_L1985 4 hours ago

"Every human being is equally capable of committing sexual assault."

A 21 y.o. man and a prepubescent girl are equally capable? If you say so. Personally, I'd tend to assume the man was guilty in the event of an encounter between the two. Perhaps I'm relying too heavily on stereotypes.

"Most African-Americans today are descended from at least one slave woman who was raped by her white slavemaster..."

Not a few white-passing Puerto Ricans are similarly descended.
"This is not inherent to Islam, and it is a cultural meme that can and must be overcome with education."

I'm going to go ahead and guess you've never actually read the Koran. Try chapter 4 for starters, if you'd like to know how women are valued relative to men.

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
The_L1985 Damion Reinhardt 3 hours ago

You're not arguing in good faith. This is your mod warning.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfem ... qus_thread

All of the above was going to be one big post, but I kept getting an SQL error.

#43823

Finally went through.

Must have been the smiley.

#43824

Ok so what I have learned today is:

1) you can't be happy about losing weight/getting in shape, because that will make (some) fat people sad

2) misogynist men who really do believe that women are no better than animals won't stop reaping until we can teach white men not to rape

#43825

Suet Cardigan wrote:
Giliell says:
January 15, 2016 at 2:41 AM
Thanks, folks.
Shouldn’t surprise you, right, but fuck…
But it’s quite telling how fascinated those dudes are with “brown hordes raping women”. Kind like a wishful fantasy. If only they could get away with it…

+++
rq
I thought this might interest you.
She's figured us out. Speaking out about rape = rapists in waiting.

I think it's quite telling that they are all shrieking incessantly about rape until it actually happens. Then, instead of calling the perpetrators to account they excuse them by the worst contortions of logic possible.

And you lurking baboons, pull up a 'nym and let's have a chat. What exactly are you afraid of? We know you read here, you know you won't be banned or your posts fucked with. Show a little courage.

#43826

Shatterface wrote:https://kiwifar.ms/attachments/image-jpeg.53735/

http://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uplo ... jpg?406560

http://imgur.com/ZKN70Dw.jpg

#43827

Steersman wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
comhcinc wrote:Oh and nothing is going to be said about Grizzly Adams dying?

That bear that post here must be completely tore up.
Well yes I did tear him up. He was delicious. :animals-bear:
Tasted of pepper spray? ;-)

They (we) don't like it in the face but apparently like the flavor. A group of people testing bear spray tried applying to some rocky ground where a well used bear trail crossed it to see if it would repel them, I guess assuming the piquant would overwhelm their senses. The bears ended up licking off the rocks.

#43828

free thoughtpolice wrote: They (we) don't like it in the face but apparently like the flavor. A group of people testing bear spray tried applying to some rocky ground where a well used bear trail crossed it to see if it would repel them, I guess assuming the piquant would overwhelm their senses. The bears ended up licking off the rocks.

Some Carrier-bear you are!

#43829

comhcinc wrote:My German is not the best (being that I have never learned the language) but I am pretty sure the sign reads:

My running shoes are surprising warm
http://i.imgur.com/FMRiwXD.jpg

What with all the rape apology going on. What happens if a refugee who can't speak German thinks it is a one time special offer.

#43830

I've been raeading the last 100 comments on "where the racist feminist at" thread at PZ's.
https://archive.is/IMe22

Filled with many gems of stupidity, most of it with Gilliel and Jadehawk, who dropped this turd showing her expertise in both anthropology and her totally inability to understand a stale old outdated joke.
Fuck these people are stupid.

Jadehawk
15 January 2016 at 3:36 am

I might be wrong, but I don’t think calling someone “a man who controls/keeps away his sisters or mother from any sexual attention” is such a compliment in US or Germany.

you would indeed be wrong. especially about the US, where fathers pride themselves on threatening the lives of potential suitors with shotguns

#43831

another lurker wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: They (we) don't like it in the face but apparently like the flavor. A group of people testing bear spray tried applying to some rocky ground where a well used bear trail crossed it to see if it would repel them, I guess assuming the piquant would overwhelm their senses. The bears ended up licking off the rocks.

Some Carrier-bear you are!

That wasn't me, I think they were Alaskan bears. Probably why Katamarri is moving up there. :drool:

#43832

Ape+lust wrote:
Shatterface wrote:https://kiwifar.ms/attachments/image-jpeg.53735/

http://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uplo ... jpg?406560
http://imgur.com/ZKN70Dw.jpg

#43833

Clip from Russia Today (RT)

What is 'Taharrush gamea'? Arab 'rape game' spreads to Europe from Middle East
[youtube]-pHnQ6W2KkM[/youtube]

#43834

comhcinc wrote:

Goddamn, he's such a ham :lol:

I've got to credit him for throwing himself at Vince. He didn't wuss out.

#43835

AndrewV69 wrote:Clip from Russia Today (RT)

What is 'Taharrush gamea'? Arab 'rape game' spreads to Europe from Middle East
[youtube]-pHnQ6W2KkM[/outube]

An SJW asked me for a citation re group of men dragging a woman off.

Of course, I can't show her this, or Vee's video, because it will be automatically dismissed as being rightwing and therefore invalid.

The irony, of course, being that these bitches whine when pro lifers, for example, refuse to look at pro choice studies.

#43836

Ape+lust wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
Goddamn, he's such a ham :lol:

I've got to credit him for throwing himself at Vince. He didn't wuss out.

Say what you will about him but he took a Stunner. Hilary never did that shit.

#43837

another lurker wrote:There is a reason that I have kept certain threads open on LJF.

The lulz keep coming in.

This is classic SJW.

Anat BarlowGirl • 30 minutes ago

Is it fatphobic to say that one personally would like to lose weight or is happy for having lost weight themselves? (Is being happy about getting into college or completing one's degree shaming and phobic towards people who for one reason or another chose not to attend college?) We can have different personal goals and celebrate whatever achievements we work hard for - and that doesn't have to be a slight against someone who does not share that goal.

•
Reply
•
Share ›

Avatar
BarlowGirl Anat • 14 minutes ago

"One" does not exist in a vacuum outside of a fatphobic society. You cannot separate wanting to "personally" lose weight from a fatphobic society in which fat is bad and thin is good, and most of the time? Yeah, you do contribute to diet culture. You contribute to the myth that weight loss is possible for the vast majority of people (it's not) and you likely contribute to stereotypes about fat people (Weight loss will make you healthier! You'll have better relationships people if you get thinner! I have to lose weight because I can't do (fitness thing) and the weight loss causes me to be able to do (fitness thing) not increasing my strength/flexibility/stamina).

I will NEVER celebrate weight loss. It is NOT a good thing. Nor it is a bad thing. Weight loss or gain is not a moral issue. And I will not celebrate a toxic culture that tells people they should try to do something probably very risky to their health that is impossible for most people, and that they're bad for not doing it. I will never celebrate a toxic culture that kills people.

This is the only response you're getting from me. I'm not going to debate Fat Acceptance 101 with you. You can research Fat Acceptance 101 for this crap

Weight loss is a myth. Almost no one can get thinner :lol:

Diet culture :lol:

Being overweight isn't unhealthy, no siree. Body weight doesn't have anything to do with stamina or fitness. :lol: ...or actually :o

OK....fat acceptance is funny up to the point where you realize that some fat people will take it seriously and use it as a justification to live very unhealthy lifestyles. Then you stop laughing and start worrying.

To all fat acceptance activists: I understand that you don't want to feel bad or ashamed about your bodies, but accepting an unhealthy condition is extremely harmful.

You don't need to get thin as a rake, or to imitate the bodies of models, but you need to get in a decent shape that can survive to a normal lifespan without exceptional medical assistance. You owe this to yourself and your loved ones.

You are hurting people and shortening their lives by spreading disinformation. Please STOP.

#43838

Kirbmarc wrote:
Weight loss is a myth. Almost no one can get thinner :lol:

Diet culture :lol:

Being overweight isn't unhealthy, no siree. Body weight doesn't have anything to do with stamina or fitness. :lol: ...or actually :o

OK....fat acceptance is funny up to the point where you realize that some fat people will take it seriously and use it as a justification to live very unhealthy lifestyles. Then you stop laughing and start worrying.

To all fat acceptance activists: I understand that you don't want to feel bad or ashamed about your bodies, but accepting an unhealthy condition is extremely harmful.

You don't need to get thin as a rake, or to imitate the bodies of models, but you need to get in a decent shape that can survive to a normal lifespan without exceptional medical assistance. You owe this to yourself and your loved ones.

You are hurting people and shortening their lives by spreading disinformation. Please STOP.

It isn't working anyway. 3X shirts are still as hard to find as they have ever been.

#43839

comhcinc wrote:Say what you will about him but he took a Stunner. Hilary never did that shit.

HAHA! I didn't know he was doing this stuff.

Bud Lite Nation knows the Noo Yawk fat cat isn't a stuffed shirt. That's pretty canny of him.

#43840

Ape+lust wrote:
HAHA! I didn't know he was doing this stuff.

Bud Lite Nation knows the Noo Yawk fat cat isn't a stuffed shirt. That's pretty canny of him.

That was years ago at Wrestlemania 23. It all happened during the "Battle of the Billionaires". Who knew that WWE would predict the presidential race ten years early?

#43841

comhcinc wrote: It isn't working anyway. 3X shirts are still as hard to find as they have ever been.

3X? Check your "small fat" privilege:

http://i.imgur.com/v5HqpYD.png

#43842

Some smallfats probably like being "shit all over"

Fucking kink shamers!

#43843

windy wrote:
comhcinc wrote: It isn't working anyway. 3X shirts are still as hard to find as they have ever been.
3X? Check your "small fat" privilege:

I check it all the time. It's depressing.

#43844

comhcinc wrote:
windy wrote:
comhcinc wrote: It isn't working anyway. 3X shirts are still as hard to find as they have ever been.
3X? Check your "small fat" privilege:

I check it all the time. It's depressing.

Do you think of Richard Carrier PhD when you do?

#43845

Kirbmarc wrote:

Until rather recently Christianity was much more similar to Islam than we think. In Southern Italy women veiled their heads until 70 or 80 years ago.

If you look at the most backward areas in Europe toward "the patriarchy, women are either mothers or whores, it's OK to pinch strangers asses and catcall them it's the areas that most recently had Muslim rulers.
Southern Spain, Sicily, Southern Italy,, the Balkans including Greece.
Places like Albania: a perfect victim of Islamist imperialism

#43846

another lurker wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
I check it all the time. It's depressing.
Do you think of Richard Carrier PhD when you do?

maybe.

#43847

windy wrote:
comhcinc wrote: It isn't working anyway. 3X shirts are still as hard to find as they have ever been.
3X? Check your "small fat" privilege:

http://i.imgur.com/v5HqpYD.png

If this is real I'm giving up on humanity.

#43848

Ape+lust wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
Goddamn, he's such a ham :lol:

I've got to credit him for throwing himself at Vince. He didn't wuss out.

Ladies and gentlemen, the next leader of the Free World.

#43849

http://dailynexus.com/2016-01-15/ucsb-g ... al-equity/

Kennus Popehattus weighs in the comments

First we had “calling me a racist just because I say racist things is censoring me!” Now we have “calling me a censor just because I want to censor things is censoring me!”

Is there no depth of fatuous, narcissistic civic illiteracy this generation of twits won’t reach?

#43850

Ftp is a smallfats bear..

Perhaps katamari will meet some bigger bears up in Alaska

#43851

NoGodsEver wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, the next leader of the Free World.

I don't like the thinking behind that type of humor. The idea that someone did something "silly" while being an entertainer somehow disqualifies a person from being elected to office.

And frankly when I think about what is best for a democracy if giving a choice between a career politician, a former head of the CIA and some guy who was a pro wrestler and if I didn't have any other information I would go with the pro wrestler every time.

#43852

Kirbmarc wrote:
Steersman wrote: :) Past their "best before" date?

Though I kind of think you're seriously deluding yourself if you think that Islam can be reformed - at least without some serious threats like deportations and banning the immigration of Muslims. All you - and Merkel and company - are doing is creating fifth columns, poisoned chalices, clasping vipers to your (our) breasts.

You might take a look at these recent articles, one from The American Enterprise Institute (Christina Hoff Sommers' stomping ground if I'm not mistaken), and one from The New York Times, both of which are broaching that issue.
The NYT article seems closer to what I say than to your hyperboles. Especially about the difference between regulated and unregulated immigration.

Any cure for extremism lies in integration. Segregation, whether blocking immigrant access to the West entirely or allowing immigrants to set up self-contained bubble societies within the West, is a road to failure.

#43853

... and then they came for the astronomers -

http://science.slashdot.org/story/16/01 ... nomy-means

#43854

another lurker wrote:Ftp is a smallfats bear..

Perhaps katamari will meet some bigger bears up in Alaska

We south/central coast types are every bit as large as the Kodiaks, unlike the runts that hang about in the Kootenays. :twisted:
I'm just saying we normally don't lick rocks. Not that there is anything wrong with that. :bjarte:

#43855

NoGodsEver wrote:
Ape+lust wrote:
comhcinc wrote:
Goddamn, he's such a ham :lol:

I've got to credit him for throwing himself at Vince. He didn't wuss out.
Ladies and gentlemen, the next leader of the Free World.

The next 10 leaders, if he gets in. The idiot press expects Democratic candidates to have Sistah Souljah moments, now Republicans will have to have their Jackass moments. Sprinting through the bear enclosure at the zoo would be an excellent way to open a lead before Super Tuesday.

#43856

comhcinc wrote:
NoGodsEver wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, the next leader of the Free World.

I don't like the thinking behind that type of humor. The idea that someone did something "silly" while being an entertainer somehow disqualifies a person from being elected to office.

It's more the silly shit he says and does when he's being completely serious that concerns me.

comhcinc wrote:And frankly when I think about what is best for a democracy if giving a choice between a career politician, a former head of the CIA and some guy who was a pro wrestler and if I didn't have any other information I would go with the pro wrestler every time.

Okay, then.

#43857

Sunder wrote: Any cure for extremism lies in integration. Segregation, whether blocking immigrant access to the West entirely or allowing immigrants to set up self-contained bubble societies within the West, is a road to failure.

Agreed completely. Granted, this will mean more incidents mass sexual harassment or assault in the shirt term, but in the end assimilation is the only way forward.

#43858

#43859

*short term

#43860

Fuvking autocorrect