Quit "double post" shaming me.comhcinc wrote:How the fuck are you people double post so long apart from each other one? Quit being special.
Quit "double post" shaming me.comhcinc wrote:How the fuck are you people double post so long apart from each other one? Quit being special.
Quit "double post" shaming me.comhcinc wrote:How the fuck are you people double post so long apart from each other one? Quit being special.
Quit "double post" shaming me.comhcinc wrote:How the fuck are you people double post so long apart from each other one? Quit being special.
comhcinc wrote:I think you broke my phone with that.
You talk the talk, but we're still waiting for hot dogs and moobs. :snooty:comhcinc wrote:I'm not giving any you asshole hugs. A reach around maybe but no hugs!
I don't know if that woman has borderline personality disorder but her behavior in the clip is typical of bpd.MacGruberKnows wrote:My thoughts:Dolores Fuller wrote:File under "When Neurology Residents Go Bad." If she had been a black teenage male, she would have had 47 bullets pumped into her instead of being put on administrative leave.
[youtube]Bvq07KBfhnQ[/youtube]
Cray cray in the vjay.
Q: What's the best thing about a blow job from this woman?
A: Might not be a great blow job but at least it will shut her up for about 5 minutes.
Q: What's the worst thing about a blow job from this woman?
A: You will probably need a new penis.
And if this woman neurologist (yes, fourth year in neurology) need's help with her neurology, I know who not to send her to.
I suppose she'll stop flogging sceptic biscuit necklaces on Etsy now then? Thought not. The greedy cunt.Tigzy wrote:Just read that Surly Amy drivel. Truly she is a child; an airheaded spakker made worse by the fact that she's now in her mid-late forties. I mean...look at this. Look at this shit:
That's - that's a Dear Muslima, right there. Remember how Becky's sycophants whined when Dawkins let rip with pretty much the same idea? That, essentially, there's bigger and worthier things to get all het up about?I was doing a photoshoot with this woman and she said to me, and I’m paraphrasing here:
I heard what she said but at the time I didn’t let it sink in. I couldn’t. I was just so damn excited to finally be part of something. I really thought the skeptic and atheist communities were going to do real good in the world...blah blah“Skeptics are all awful people because if you think that the biggest problems one faces in life is whether or not there is a bigfoot or if someone thinks they are psychic, you’re actually a huge asshole. There are much bigger problems in society. Ignoring those bigger issues to pick on people who you think you are smarter than makes you a terrible person who is blind to the real problems in the world.”
Holy fucking shit.
And again - why does Amy and her kind get so worked up about the idea that skeptics spend too much time poring over bigfoot and Chupacabras stories? As Noel Plum pointed out - what do you expect? It's like being shocked by the fact that a group of model railway enthusiasts spend an inordinate amount of time talking about...model trains.
Fucking hell.
And remember, a middle-aged woman wrote this cretinous, lightweight, simpering nonsense. Poor Surly Johnny - I do feel sorry for him. He reminds me of those poor little shivering chihuahuas that you see stuffed into the handbags of gobby bimbos.
IOW's Carrier came and went.Dick Strawkins wrote:Regarding the demise of AtheismPlus, we, unfortunately, cannot take the plaudits.
It's death came from two sources.
First, obviously, from the logical application of SJW ideology and their need for purity. I think it was Mykeru who summed it up nicely by saying that the Atheism Plus forum was like a Masada for douchebags. Their need for self righteous indignation ond constantly being offended led to a competitive outrage and the denouncing and banning other members until nobody remained.
The second reason is Richard Carrier.
In probably his one positive contribution to the atheist movement, Carrier managed to turn the Atheism Plus cause into an us-or-them ultimatum and do it in such a fuckwitted and vicious way (intellectual artillery, CHUDs etc) that all sensible atheists immediately decided that whatever group Carrier was for was clearly the one to avoid.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S4RnXucHAFo/U ... +stock.jpg
Fuck, I never realised how bad it was at Atheism+. It's laughable that Myers thinks they were driven away from A+ by the rest of 'movement atheism'.Ape+lust wrote:If anyone wants to see AtheismPlus's hug apocalypse, I've got the thread they tweezed off the original to quarantine Simpleflower.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/96kt1 ... alypse.zip
When TF tweeted to Carrier what a failure A+ was, Carrier actually tweeted TF that A+ was a success because it had met all of it's goals.HunnyBunny wrote:Fuck, I never realised how bad it was at Atheism+. It's laughable that Myers thinks they were driven away from A+ by the rest of 'movement atheism'.Ape+lust wrote:If anyone wants to see AtheismPlus's hug apocalypse, I've got the thread they tweezed off the original to quarantine Simpleflower.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/96kt1 ... alypse.zip
They were forced away by the toxic stench of what they created. The natural conclusion of their 'inclusiveness' was including all the looney toons, because they were the only ones crazy enough to listen and believe.
Jean and Billie.Billie from Ockham wrote:Wow. I could have written that blog entry. Thanks for the link.Ape+lust wrote:That's what Jean Kazez thought too. She was mostly ignored.Billie from Ockham wrote:Thanks. So I'm now more convinced that what's in this video is what led to "Dear Muslima."
http://kazez.blogspot.com/2011/07/eleva ... wires.html
I've met people who were hospitalized with serious mental illnesses (bipolar, schizophrenia, etc) and they were both more grounded and far more pleasant than the worst of the A+ horde.MacGruberKnows wrote:Even the admins at the crazyplace seem to know that there were a lot of crazypeople at the crazyplace making it look like a (trigger warning: ableism alert level 5 ahead) fucking insane asylum.
You better be nice to Kristine! She's a dear, dear friend of mine.comhcinc wrote:Kristine wrote:Go right ahead. I know way too much about the subject.comhcinc wrote:Have anyone ever talked about bigfoot here?
Did you know that Bigfoot is Gay and has been in a long term relationship with the 6 million dollar man?
Also welcome and fuck off.
Indeed. Apropos of which, a portion of a post from Brendan O'Neill who may well have had A+ in mind while he was writing it:Satan wrote:I've met people who were hospitalized with serious mental illnesses (bipolar, schizophrenia, etc) and they were both more grounded and far more pleasant than the worst of the A+ horde.MacGruberKnows wrote:Even the admins at the crazyplace seem to know that there were a lot of crazypeople at the crazyplace making it look like a (trigger warning: ableism alert level 5 ahead) fucking insane asylum.
Plussers are more like the population in secure hospital/prisons for the criminally insane: vicious and decoupled from reality.
And, somewhat apropos of your signature, seems some "feminists" are getting their knickers in a twist over Oxford Dictionaries using "rabid feminist" as an example:The violence of the Safe Space
On 23 January I took part in a debate about free speech on campus at the University of California Irvine. These were my opening remarks.
The most striking thing about Safe Spaces on campus is how unsafe they are. How hostile and even violent they are towards anyone who has unpopular views, or who simply believes people should have the right to express unpopular views.
Safe Spaces are spreading across campuses in the US and the UK. They’re presented as happy-clappy therapeutic zones in which students, especially minority students, should not be subjected to gruff words or prejudicial ideas.
As one student union in Britain puts it, they’re spaces in which students must be “free from intimidation or judgement” and should always “feel comfortable”. These spaces are justified in inoffensive, Oprah-like language: it’s all about providing a space in which people can be themselves without fear of ridicule.
But in practice, Safe Spaces are ugly, authoritarian places. They’re propped up by menace. They’re fortified by a simmering threat of force against any transgressors of the new cult of psychic safety and moral conformism. ....
Don't forget Ceepolk! In a strong field of power-crazed moderators I think she was the most out-there. Epic stuff at times over there.Dick Strawkins wrote:Regarding the demise of AtheismPlus, we, unfortunately, cannot take the plaudits.
It's death came from two sources.
First, obviously, from the logical application of SJW ideology and their need for purity. I think it was Mykeru who summed it up nicely by saying that the Atheism Plus forum was like a Masada for douchebags. Their need for self righteous indignation ond constantly being offended led to a competitive outrage and the denouncing and banning other members until nobody remained.
was in response to a challenge by .....He spoke some words to her. Just words. She no doubt replied with words. That was that. Words. Only words, and apparently quite polite words at that.
I remember reading that thread in real time.Brive1987 wrote:A very special moment in history.
http://i.imgur.com/8vxiaql.jpg
https://web.archive.org/web/20110706211 ... _names.php?
It looks to me as if a lot of people are forgetting exactly what Dawkins did – he made a handful of short comments on a blog. Is this seriously so newsworthy that it merits whole podcasts and interviews? What next, Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, The Daily Show? We’re talking about three comments on a fucking blog.
It’s trivial. Ok? Trivial. I say that in cold blood, as one who writes a blog herself. Nothing I write at my place is worth Serious Media Attention, and neither is anything anyone else says there. The same goes for PZ’s blog, except for the fact that he has so many readers that his does kind of count in some way. But not this way (and I think he’d agree with me).
I still think what Dawkins said was too brusque and also mostly wrong – but I also think it was insignificant in the great scheme of things.
"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."Jan Steen wrote:Sulky Amy on the origin of The Rift in the a/s movement.
Oh dear. Another lying airhead who doesn't know what the word 'literally' means. Then she tells us how she discovered that she had always been a feminist without knowing it.Then Richard Dawkins made fun of Rebecca in the comment section of another blog. Literally within moments of that happening all of the women on Skepchick who were active writers at the time (most of them long gone now) became targets of an online hate campaign. It literally happened so fast that I didn’t have time to process it. One day I was a Dawkins and SGU fan who was dedicated to making the world better by encouraging more people to get involved with organized skepticism, atheism and critical thinking and then the next day I was told I was part of a clique of radical feminists who should be raped and killed.
No, Amy, please pay attention; skepticism is for actual skeptics: people who are not satisfied with "The Patriarchy did it", "Shut up and listen", "Check your privilege", "X is a social construct", "white men are evil", and thought-terminating clichés in general. If you want to be part of the a/s movement, you should "examine" your feminist/po-mo dogmas first. Then come back. Or don't.I learned about bigotry. I learned about privilege. (...) Things like poverty and lack of healthcare could become game changers in the skeptic communities. These issues were so closely linked to the vaccine work we had started that I’m surprised the connection wasn’t made sooner. But anytime anyone would bring up one of these issues it was met by the skeptic and atheist community with violent or dismissive rhetoric.
The only issues that were acceptable, were issues that rich white men could joke about over an expensive scotch. Wage gaps, gun control, healthcare for women, the school to prison pipeline or police violence in black communities were not something that skeptics could be bothered with. Theirs is a game of Bigfoot and blaming religion which comfortably allows them to slip back into making fun of people they think they are smarter than. Skepticism is for white men.
http://skepchick.org/2016/01/assholes-and-heads/
Ohh that Kristine :dance: :dance: Shimmy ShimmyPhil_Giordana_FCD wrote:You better be nice to Kristine! She's a dear, dear friend of mine.comhcinc wrote:Kristine wrote:
Go right ahead. I know way too much about the subject.
Did you know that Bigfoot is Gay and has been in a long term relationship with the 6 million dollar man?
Also welcome and fuck off.
Hi Kristine, fuck off!
The Yeti wrote:PZ is already out with yet another butthurt post. This one is hitching about how his SJW baboon contingent hasn't successfully taken over atheism. He also takes a bunch of shots at Hitchens. Did he even have the balls to challenge Hitch like that when he was still alive?
Archive link: https://archive.is/lMsHv
Mirror, mirror on the wall.pzm wrote:Amy Roth makes me sad with her perspective on the history of involvement with skepticism and atheism. How do you destroy a movement? By making enemies of the people who care about it.
She has had crap sex with a man therefore All Sex With Men Is Like That. And she can't possibly play any part in making it better, because modern feminism means all women must be agency-free snowflakes whose entire passage through life is gifted to them on a plate with bunnies and marshmallows.windy wrote:I need feminism because I've been brainwashed to believe that hetero sex normally involves PIV:
http://feministing.com/2016/01/19/what- ... en-asleep/Who are you? You’re a decent guy. You’re solid. I do not feel like you are going to rape me. (Yay! Let’s throw a party!)
No, you’re not a bad guy. The sex wasn’t particularly bad, either. And I know bad sex. I know sex that tastes like coercion and I know sex that tastes like endings and I know sex that tastes like hand sanitizer, which is a bad thing to put on your hands before you finger someone.
No, friend, it was not bad sex. It was normal sex. Normal, boring, vaguely dehumanizing hetero sex.
Which is precisely the point: The normalcy.
Believe me: I enjoy having someone mortar-and-pestle me for a few minutes as much as the next ornery bisexual. But friend, I feel that you can do better. I feel that we all can do better. Because there was something in the choreography of the whole thing that just struck me as, I don’t know — unsatisfying in a way only feminism can remedy.
Yup, I’m talking about the orgasm deficit.
Before we talk about orgasm, let’s talk about sex. What is sex?
Here, supposedly, is what you consider sex: We make out, you play with my boobs, I blow you, you do not go down on me even though I ask [*insert some bullshit on how “I only go down on women I’m in love with. Now put it in your mouth.”]. Penis goes in vagina, penis moves in and out of vagina, penis causes air to enter vagina and makes a lot of funny farting sounds, someone actually farts and pretends it is a funny vagina farting sound but it was totally a real fart, penis ejaculates.
You roll off of me, get up, take the condom off/pee/do whatever it is people with penises do in the bathroom immediately after they’ve come (world’s great, great mysteries), put your pants on, come back into bed, and fall asleep. Sex is now over. Sex is now over because you have decided it is over. You have decided sex is over because you are a man, and because this choreography that favors men with penises — man becomes erect, man penetrates woman, man ejaculates — is what we have been told sex is.
Because we’re brainwashed.
The funny part was that the mods noticed that the regulars wanted to dogpile someone, and it seemed a bit unjust, event to them, to do this in the sacrosanct 'help and support' section, they simply just moved the entire thread to a different section so everyone could continue with social justice consciences intact.MacGruberKnows wrote:Is that the one who had the meltdown/temper tantrum over people not giving her virtual hugs? That was even better than the newcomer who was told by an administrator that he was being 'intellectual ableist" for saying he was glad to be on a site with so many smart people.Ape+lust wrote:Simpleflower the cannibal. We won the lottery with that one.Tigzy wrote:A+ never needed to be trolled. It was a self-generating lolcow. Jesus, the yuk-yuks you used to get from that place. Anyone remember Simpleflower? S/he of the 'lets make a social justice paradise in Chernobyl!' fame and huggate - which had the rare distinction of actually making Justicar look like enjoyable company in that vid he did where he could do nothing but crack up about it.
http://imgur.com/nxPOsAl.jpg
Carrie Poppy Surlyramics photoshoot, May 2010.HoneyWagon wrote:"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."
$5 says that is Carrie Poppy she is talking about btw.
They were pals then as now.
Timeline off a bit as Carrie was not yet with JREF 5 years ago (Although Carrie was Friends with DJ Grothe before she started working for JREF).
But she did stuff with LA based skeptic groups.
I remember a time when I actually cared about the rise of religion in US education. Now, I don't give a shit anymore. Too much lulz to be had with identity politics. Talk about a movement shooting itself in the foot.Sunder wrote:I'd hazard a guess that the last ~5 years of dealing with identity politics nonsense has had a bigger effect on the A/S scene than people just thinking a narrow focus on anti-woo and religion isn't for them. Or at the very least, it's created too much noise to accurately measure the impact of "bigfoot skepticism" via something like conference attendance.
Didn't I read somewhere that West's husband is gay?Billie from Ockham wrote:Laugh all you want, but I think that Lindy West looks like Divine.Really? wrote:Feminists drive away real men? THen how did Lindy West marry this combination of John Wayne, Clint Eastwood and Shaft?
http://assets.feministing.com/wp-conten ... /West.jpeg
Daft Amy might be calling PETA a skeptic organization. Poppy was doing national PR for them. Well, she called it PR, but with PETA it's more about provoking controversy than seeking good press. There's no bottom to how low they'll go for attention. It's probably excellent training for someone who'd later aspire to be a behind the scenes shit-stirrer.HoneyWagon wrote:"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."
$5 says that is Carrie Poppy she is talking about btw.
They were pals then as now.
Timeline off a bit as Carrie was not yet with JREF 5 years ago (Although Carrie was Friends with DJ Grothe before she started working for JREF).
But she did stuff with LA based skeptic groups.
She was drunk. Drunk people do all kinds of weird shit. That's the whole awesome point of being drunk (I should know).MacGruberKnows wrote:My thoughts:Dolores Fuller wrote:File under "When Neurology Residents Go Bad." If she had been a black teenage male, she would have had 47 bullets pumped into her instead of being put on administrative leave.
[youtube]Bvq07KBfhnQ[/youtube]
Cray cray in the vjay.
Q: What's the best thing about a blow job from this woman?
A: Might not be a great blow job but at least it will shut her up for about 5 minutes.
Q: What's the worst thing about a blow job from this woman?
A: You will probably need a new penis.
And if this woman neurologist (yes, fourth year in neurology) need's help with her neurology, I know who not to send her to.
Call me Ismael, but isn't that a typo in his name on the banner?Søren Lilholt wrote:Didn't I read somewhere that West's husband is gay?Billie from Ockham wrote:Laugh all you want, but I think that Lindy West looks like Divine.Really? wrote:Feminists drive away real men? THen how did Lindy West marry this combination of John Wayne, Clint Eastwood and Shaft?
http://assets.feministing.com/wp-conten ... /West.jpeg
This photo is not inconsistent with that hypothesis.
She probably wouldn't know. She never uses his name. It's always "my husband" this, "my husband" that.Dick Strawkins wrote:http://assets.feministing.com/wp-conten ... /West.jpeg
Call me Ismael, but isn't that a typo in his name on the banner?
:bjarte:HoneyWagon wrote:"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."Jan Steen wrote:Sulky Amy on the origin of The Rift in the a/s movement.
Oh dear. Another lying airhead who doesn't know what the word 'literally' means. Then she tells us how she discovered that she had always been a feminist without knowing it.Then Richard Dawkins made fun of Rebecca in the comment section of another blog. Literally within moments of that happening all of the women on Skepchick who were active writers at the time (most of them long gone now) became targets of an online hate campaign. It literally happened so fast that I didn’t have time to process it. One day I was a Dawkins and SGU fan who was dedicated to making the world better by encouraging more people to get involved with organized skepticism, atheism and critical thinking and then the next day I was told I was part of a clique of radical feminists who should be raped and killed.
No, Amy, please pay attention; skepticism is for actual skeptics: people who are not satisfied with "The Patriarchy did it", "Shut up and listen", "Check your privilege", "X is a social construct", "white men are evil", and thought-terminating clichés in general. If you want to be part of the a/s movement, you should "examine" your feminist/po-mo dogmas first. Then come back. Or don't.I learned about bigotry. I learned about privilege. (...) Things like poverty and lack of healthcare could become game changers in the skeptic communities. These issues were so closely linked to the vaccine work we had started that I’m surprised the connection wasn’t made sooner. But anytime anyone would bring up one of these issues it was met by the skeptic and atheist community with violent or dismissive rhetoric.
The only issues that were acceptable, were issues that rich white men could joke about over an expensive scotch. Wage gaps, gun control, healthcare for women, the school to prison pipeline or police violence in black communities were not something that skeptics could be bothered with. Theirs is a game of Bigfoot and blaming religion which comfortably allows them to slip back into making fun of people they think they are smarter than. Skepticism is for white men.
http://skepchick.org/2016/01/assholes-and-heads/
$5 says that is Carrie Poppy she is talking about btw.
They were pals then as now.
Timeline off a bit as Carrie was not yet with JREF 5 years ago (Although Carrie was Friends with DJ Grothe before she started working for JREF).
But she did stuff with LA based skeptic groups.
No, it leads to rape allegations which should be believed because some obscure statistic, somewhere, once said that false rape allegations are vanishingly rare.Shatterface wrote:Myers sees the world through rape-coloured glasses. When he closes his eyes he sees rape. At night his sticky sheets cling to him as he dreams of rape. He can't be alone with s female student because the idea of a man and a woman together leads inevitably to rape. He's one sick, sick fuck.
Speaking of Mr. Spellchecker, here's a new thing:Michael J wrote:I think PZ's use of Regressive show how butt hurt was about being call regressive-left. He always thought he was being edgy but he's aware that most people see he belongs to a bunch of Authoritarian twits.
Also FTB got quite a boost from GSpellchecker and Thunderfoot. I think he is trolling for more hits
The behaviour of a few pampered black millionaires in Hollywood is every bit as babyish and illogical as the recent student protests over poo on the wall. These cunts are effectively saying that nomimations should be based on skin colour not merit, that we shouldn't take a colourblind view of the world when evaluating people's contribution, and that we should always reduce people to pawns in a wider sociopolitical struggle. With the implication that if you argue with this grotesque proposition (while having the temerity to be white) you are racist.Spike13 wrote:The Academy has announced that by 2020 they will double the number of female and minority members. ( and will add three seats immediately)
Not for nothing but, Hollywood is the most liberal place on earth. To suggest that the academy suffers from racism is fairly laughable.
As we all know there is no mollifying the SJW's
Be prepared for block buster sized pandering in the future.
The Academy will henceforth dispense honors whether they are deserved or not.
Indeed, the feminist movement has overused and extended 'rape' beyond the limits of its flexibility, so it has lost its power as one of the most serious crimes the law recognises.comhcinc wrote:The thing that upsets me is how nonchalant they are about rape. It never really raises to the level of being forced to have sex with someone yet for some of them they use the term to rape to mean a person looking at them that they don't like.
Yeah, she used to work for PETA, but I would be surprised if Amy meant that. While Amy is Vegan now, she wasn't 5 years ago.Ape+lust wrote:Daft Amy might be calling PETA a skeptic organization. Poppy was doing national PR for them. Well, she called it PR, but with PETA it's more about provoking controversy than seeking good press. There's no bottom to how low they'll go for attention. It's probably excellent training for someone who'd later aspire to be a behind the scenes shit-stirrer.HoneyWagon wrote:"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."
$5 says that is Carrie Poppy she is talking about btw.
They were pals then as now.
Timeline off a bit as Carrie was not yet with JREF 5 years ago (Although Carrie was Friends with DJ Grothe before she started working for JREF).
But she did stuff with LA based skeptic groups.
Carrie Poppy's elevator-centric peta PR was legendary. Even if she doesn't know how to wear suspenders.Ape+lust wrote:Daft Amy might be calling PETA a skeptic organization. Poppy was doing national PR for them. Well, she called it PR, but with PETA it's more about provoking controversy than seeking good press. There's no bottom to how low they'll go for attention. It's probably excellent training for someone who'd later aspire to be a behind the scenes shit-stirrer.HoneyWagon wrote:"I met a woman about 5 years ago who was working for a skeptic organization doing PR."
$5 says that is Carrie Poppy she is talking about btw.
They were pals then as now.
Timeline off a bit as Carrie was not yet with JREF 5 years ago (Although Carrie was Friends with DJ Grothe before she started working for JREF).
But she did stuff with LA based skeptic groups.
Yeah, she's nothing if not loyal. When she's shaking her fist at someone, she's mad because Rebecca is mad.Brive1987 wrote:I've always seen Amy as a broken dolly desperately seeking acceptance and affirmation. She will parrot whatever nonsense is necessary to buy friendship. She would have been just as comfortable sporting a Totenkopf surly if it would 've got her into the Hofbräuhaus where everyone knows your name.
Thompson is kind of Andy Kaufman strange. He made dozens of episodes of a one-joke web series called Celebs. All the same, all deliberately cringeworthy, week after week.HoneyWagon wrote:Yeah, she used to work for PETA, but I would be surprised if Amy meant that. While Amy is Vegan now, she wasn't 5 years ago.
Carrie was hired by JREF formally in June 2012. She quit not long after the Women in Secularism Conference in late 2012...the conference full of people calling her boss a misogynist.
https://archive.is/IhdWm
There is no way she would have gone there if she hadn't already decided to leave the JREF. Her boyfriend Brian Thompson still worked at JREF for months after that though. But I am sure he never grabbed any info off the computers or anything.
In case you forgot who Brian is:
http://madartlab.com/files/2012/09/6215 ... 721_o1.jpg
"As a board member of Secular Woman, I do want to mention that our leadership attended Heads this year"Brive1987 wrote:Secular Woman politely but firmly bitch-slaps Surly's ZOG conspiracy theory about the "heads" masonic moot.
And Amyindicates she gets paid actual money from the org formangles english yet again.
http://i.imgur.com/gCM4qBn.jpg
I though PZ's atheism was intersectional, or it would be bullshit?Brive1987 wrote:Poor Jamila Bey.
Still on the FtB roll.
Still in PZ's sights.
And lumped in with the rapists, killers and exploiters of FGM.
We have an atheism that sees science-denying, anti-government radically conservative organizations as fertile recruiting grounds.
Thar she blows!Ape+lust wrote:She probably wouldn't know. She never uses his name. It's always "my husband" this, "my husband" that.Dick Strawkins wrote:http://assets.feministing.com/wp-conten ... /West.jpeg
Call me Ismael, but isn't that a typo in his name on the banner?
This guy reads with approval the works of people who are directly (Trotski) or indirectly (Marx, Engels) responsible for communist atrocities, then proceeds with a gigantic straw man (which atheists are against social equality and equal wages?), and finally makes the baseless assumption that if you are not on his side (the side of proven mass murderers like Trotski et al.), then you might as well be voting for the Blairs/Reagans of this word. Nice example of the fallacy of the excluded middle.rorschach
24 January 2016 at 6:18 am
SC @ 53,
Rings true.Another way of putting this, of course, is that atheism/skepticism during the past few centuries has had some success as a movement in part (not entirely) because it’s, net, been useful to the forces of capitalism, imperialism and white male supremacy. At a basic level, atheism/skepticism is and remains (potentially) subversive, but as a human movement it can be, and has in large part been, coopted and used. To this extent, it’s been a non-threat, and even a support and partner, to Christianity.
I’m rereading Marx, Trotzki and Engels these days and I’m just like “yes of course” all the time.
These atheists who deny social equality, equal wages, who are not at all concerned with social matters and for whom gnawing at female ankles at conventions does not constitute a noteworthy offence, might as well be voting for the Abbotts/Reagans/Blairs of this world. They may be voting for them already, for all I know.
I don't know, it would be much easier to assess whether you're a rapist shitlord if we actually saw the picture :twisted:Dick Strawkins wrote:I remember reading some article a while back that featured Amy Roth and her exhibition of misogyny room at the Hollywood CFI building.
The article attracted my attention for two reasons, first it showed a picture of Amy with some examples of the horrid abuse she and her fellow Skepchicks had to suffer - one of which, apparently, was a photoshop I had made a couple of years previously.
(I won't say which picture it was but it wasn't originally posted on the slymepit) The other thing that I noticed was that she had cropped the picture such that she cut out almost half the targets of the joke. Specifically she had cropped it so that two men were removed, leaving several women in frame. It was a blatant attempt to portray the picture as being solely against women when it was clearly targeting a mixed group of men and women.
So yes, they lie.
We have Yeti here and nobody has denied his existence so. QED.Really? wrote:
Just because some of us have made zero effort to look like Bigfoot doesn't mean strangers shouldn't immediately know we are Bigfoots and treat us accordingly.
