Fart for your life little buddy. Expired Fruit cups and soda.Service Dog wrote:I'm organizing a FartWalk to protest Parody Accountant teaching Beyonce to fart, instead of teaching Elmo_fo not to rape.
Also: The UN must act to End Dog-Blaming!
http://www.theundomesticated.com/2013/0 ... farts.html
Ape+lust wrote:Melody wants you to know you're all to blame when she's found twittered to death.
http://imgur.com/c9HwZ8P.jpg
I can't laugh about that. Elyse is using her children to grandstand. It's narcissism at its finest. What child decides in first grade that they're not going to do the pledge of allegiance? Sure, the pledge is bullshit. Kids are not old enough to consent to that sort of thing. But did the kid really decide to do that on their own, without parental pushing and shoving? What Elyse is doing is no better than a christian indoctrinating his kids. She's not teaching them to think, to reason or to make moral choices. She's trying to make them into little cultural warriors. If she was a muslim, she'd be strapping explosives to them and praising Allah.Parody Accountant wrote:What the fuckService Dog wrote:http://i.imgur.com/H7pP9Yj.png
http://i.imgur.com/Tp2DaY5.png
http://i.imgur.com/83ypgRn.png
http://i.imgur.com/FGgbZci.png
http://i.imgur.com/kr0cfsp.png
http://i.imgur.com/aRWskd5.png
Smashing their toilet training seats: the symbol of their oppressions.
Lol.
:naughty: Just a simple panic attack. Could happen to anybody.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: Their mother is facing felony charges for getting boozed and pilled up and assaulting a police officer.
Neat.Service Dog wrote:Is a hoax bomb I heard about on the internet as lethal as a physical bomb?
Why is stoopid Gavin McGinness the only reporter telling me that the kid's sister was previously suspended from school for saying she wanted to blow up the school?
[youtube]2R5peL26L-U[/youtube]
About The Project
The Women's Media Center Speech Project will use WMC's journalism and activism platform to spotlight and document online abuse and suppression of women's free speech, and to better inform the tech and media industries and the criminal justice system. Our goal is the creation of new laws and policies that are effective in stopping constant, toxic online abuse, and in expanding women's safe free expression.
That would be nice - I watched yesterday's roll in from 60 floors up and that was a buzz.KiwiInOz wrote:We might have another 10 minute storm this afternoon if you are lucky.Brive1987 wrote:snip
Oh my One Note is bulging quite satisfactorily on this food.
Right now I am doing it tough in Brisbane on leave. The now deployed web/CRM project almost tipped me. Actually got physical stress signs after working 5 weekends in a row on top of 8 months of joy.
I second this prediction. A white lady with no priors, and a good lawyer, and a documented history of mental disorder.comhcinc wrote:deLurch wrote: So November 19th is the next court date event. I have no idea what they mean by "conference," but in my non-legal mind that kind of suggests a status report & maybe a plea deal are in the works. She got a mental exam and had to pee in a cup. Maybe they are going to try and see if she is fit to stand trial, or if she works something out with the prosecutor.
You are reading way to into that.
The prosecutor wants a win that is what is important to them. There is always a plea deal in the works. Always. No matter what.
I predict probation maybe some AA.
#ItGetsBetterKirbmarc wrote:Arthur Chu has a modest proposal.
No, he's not a cannibal. He just wants people to be able to see Facebook or Twitter for "enabling abusive comments" by repelling Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that protects providers of Internet services, and private citizens like bloggers from being liable to lawsuits because of what other people write using those services or in the comments of those blogs.
What Chu doesn't realize is that this would mean that if someone comments on,say, his blog, he'd be liable for everything that this person has written. Of course Chu would immediately delete any "abusive comment", would he?
What about his own "abusive comments" made by his friends towards GamerGate or other people? Does he really want to liable for all of them?
He mentions "doxing" above the abuse. Does this mean that he wants PZ Myers to be liable for a lawsuit for publishing the Skepchick tweet that doxxed Skep Tickle?
Remind me, how did Chu become famous? Was it because he was supposed to be smart?
Even Popehat is facepalming:
Stick to Jeopardy, Chu.
I have been quite disappointed with Brisbane's storms. They are over before you even know that you've had one. They often bifurcate around us too, heading north to the Sunshine Coast and west across from Ipswich. Sydney storms, IIRC, go on for a bit longer with more lightning and rain.Brive1987 wrote:That would be nice - I watched yesterday's roll in from 60 floors up and that was a buzz.KiwiInOz wrote:We might have another 10 minute storm this afternoon if you are lucky.Brive1987 wrote:snip
Oh my One Note is bulging quite satisfactorily on this food.
Right now I am doing it tough in Brisbane on leave. The now deployed web/CRM project almost tipped me. Actually got physical stress signs after working 5 weekends in a row on top of 8 months of joy.
^THIS!CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: I can't laugh about that. Elyse is using her children to grandstand. It's narcissism at its finest. What child decides in first grade that they're not going to do the pledge of allegiance? Sure, the pledge is bullshit. Kids are not old enough to consent to that sort of thing. But did the kid really decide to do that on their own, without parental pushing and shoving? What Elyse is doing is no better than a christian indoctrinating his kids. She's not teaching them to think, to reason or to make moral choices. She's trying to make them into little cultural warriors. If she was a muslim, she'd be strapping explosives to them and praising Allah.
Why would any sane parent broadcast their child's wanting to sleep in the nude to total strangers? Their toilet habits? Why would anybody do that to their child? The net never forgets. They are oversharing to show what a perfect SJW they are, and how they are raising "freedom fighters" to smash the patriarchy, but they apparently can't get it into their vacuous heads that the kid might not want this information shared. They might grow up and actually disagree with their parents. They might be humiliated to learn the kind of literal shit their mom shares with everybody with an internet connection. The kid cannot consent to this, period.
It's one thing to be proud of your child, make a note of special achievements and occasions. Share it with friends and family on Facebook. But as far as I'm concerned Elyse hasn't just crossed the line into child abuse, she's fucking dragged her shit-smeared ass across it into the next county, like a dog with an itch. She's not trying to raise children, she's trying to deform them like some sort of SJW Bonsai tree.
How fucking beta is Honeybanders? He must be just as mental as Elyse, or even a doormat would figure out that this sort of shit is wrong. And all her friends encourage this crap. I really feel bad for these kids. They are in a formative period of their life. They're being used as pawns for Elyse's SJW game, they are undoubtedly going to be ostracized in school. Their mother is facing felony charges for getting boozed and pilled up and assaulting a police officer. What a role model. I don't doubt they will wise up long before they grow up, but this sort of stuff scars.
Sorry for the rant. I just hope those kids end up in a good home, and soon.
The white retangles all appear to be either a 15 or 30 mg dose of Buspirone Hydrochloride (of various versions or generics)Clonazepam is used in the treatment of benzodiazepine withdrawal; anxiety; bipolar disorder; insomnia; panic disorder (and more), and belongs to the drug classes benzodiazepine anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Clonazepam 1 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
White pills bottom, There appears to be an "R-" or stylized "R" or a christian fish with a minus sign. They evidently are all supposed to be a stylized "R"Buspirone is an anti-anxiety medicine that affects chemicals in your brain that may become unbalanced and cause anxiety.
Buspirone is used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as fear, tension, irritability, dizziness, pounding heartbeat, and other physical symptoms.
Buspirone is not an anti-psychotic medication and should not be used in place of medication prescribed by your doctor for mental illness.
And if that is the case, then the above white pills are probably the 1 or 2 mg version of Alprazolam too.Alprazolam is used in the treatment of anxiety; panic disorder; depression; tinnitus; dysautonomia and belongs to the drug class benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Alprazolam 2 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
At some point her kids are going to do what all kids do and start mimicking what the adults in their lives do.Service Dog wrote:http://i.imgur.com/FGgbZci.png
Yeah. Makeup on a five-year old. Not cute, Elyse, especially from somebody complaining about rape culture, patriarchy and women being objectified. How the fuck can a woman that complains constantly about being objectified put makeup on her child? How the fuck does that figure?deLurch wrote:One of the saddest things you will see today.
It isn't so much the make up as a small girl that young feeling she has the weight on her shoulders to dance an sing to make her mother happy. I guess the context is more apparent when viewed in instagram surrounded by all the train wreck poor-me Elyse photos.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Yeah. Makeup on a five-year old. Not cute, Elyse, especially from somebody complaining about rape culture, patriarchy and women being objectified. How the fuck can a woman that complains constantly about being objectified put makeup on her child? How the fuck does that figure?deLurch wrote:One of the saddest things you will see today.
You know that moment when someone who you've tried for a very long time to be sympthetic towards does just that one little thing that destroys any remaining sympathy?Ape+lust wrote:Lol. Elyse's Airbnb hosts put up this review:
http://imgur.com/nudJI9S.png
Pretty mild, right? Not for Elyse. She's in full THIS WILL NOT STAND mode, destroying slut shamers and patriarchy's ugly face for daring to challenge her. She never mentions the blankets, though :lol:
http://www.elyseanders.com/blog/2015/9/ ... -slutshame
You're right, I didn't get the context, because, to be honest, I couldn't stand more than a few seconds of the video. The child seems very sweet, but as you say she shouldn't be there just to be an object to her mother. Another tool to be used for Elyse's narcissism. Makes me really sad, to be honest. It's like Little Honey Boo Boo or whatever for the SJW crowd. Probably even less healthy though.deLurch wrote:It isn't so much the make up as a small girl that young feeling she has the weight on her shoulders to dance an sing to make her mother happy. I guess the context is more apparent when viewed in instagram surrounded by all the train wreck poor-me Elyse photos.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Yeah. Makeup on a five-year old. Not cute, Elyse, especially from somebody complaining about rape culture, patriarchy and women being objectified. How the fuck can a woman that complains constantly about being objectified put makeup on her child? How the fuck does that figure?deLurch wrote:One of the saddest things you will see today.
I almost understood that. Thinks?rayshul wrote:Well my three year old things her five year old is cool
Well I can't just let myself deal with it. It was sandwiched between these photos.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:You're right, I didn't get the context, because, to be honest, I couldn't stand more than a few seconds of the video. The child seems very sweet, but as you say she shouldn't be there just to be an object to her mother. Another tool to be used for Elyse's narcissism. Makes me really sad, to be honest. It's like Little Honey Boo Boo or whatever for the SJW crowd. Probably even less healthy though.
ThisCaptainFluffyBunny wrote:I can't laugh about that. Elyse is using her children to grandstand. It's narcissism at its finest. What child decides in first grade that they're not going to do the pledge of allegiance? Sure, the pledge is bullshit. Kids are not old enough to consent to that sort of thing. But did the kid really decide to do that on their own, without parental pushing and shoving? What Elyse is doing is no better than a christian indoctrinating his kids. She's not teaching them to think, to reason or to make moral choices. She's trying to make them into little cultural warriors. If she was a muslim, she'd be strapping explosives to them and praising Allah.Parody Accountant wrote:What the fuckService Dog wrote:http://i.imgur.com/H7pP9Yj.png
http://i.imgur.com/Tp2DaY5.png
http://i.imgur.com/83ypgRn.png
http://i.imgur.com/FGgbZci.png
http://i.imgur.com/kr0cfsp.png
http://i.imgur.com/aRWskd5.png
Smashing their toilet training seats: the symbol of their oppressions.
Lol.
Why would any sane parent broadcast their child's wanting to sleep in the nude to total strangers? Their toilet habits? Why would anybody do that to their child? The net never forgets. They are oversharing to show what a perfect SJW they are, and how they are raising "freedom fighters" to smash the patriarchy, but they apparently can't get it into their vacuous heads that the kid might not want this information shared. They might grow up and actually disagree with their parents. They might be humiliated to learn the kind of literal shit their mom shares with everybody with an internet connection. The kid cannot consent to this, period.
It's one thing to be proud of your child, make a note of special achievements and occasions. Share it with friends and family on Facebook. But as far as I'm concerned Elyse hasn't just crossed the line into child abuse, she's fucking dragged her shit-smeared ass across it into the next county, like a dog with an itch. She's not trying to raise children, she's trying to deform them like some sort of SJW Bonsai tree.
How fucking beta is Honeybanders? He must be just as mental as Elyse, or even a doormat would figure out that this sort of shit is wrong. And all her friends encourage this crap. I really feel bad for these kids. They are in a formative period of their life. They're being used as pawns for Elyse's SJW game, they are undoubtedly going to be ostracized in school. Their mother is facing felony charges for getting boozed and pilled up and assaulting a police officer. What a role model. I don't doubt they will wise up long before they grow up, but this sort of stuff scars.
Sorry for the rant. I just hope those kids end up in a good home, and soon.
I read it the same way. But I immediately assumed it was a mistake, because surely even someone as monumentally fucked up as Elyse wouldn't...couldn't...could she? :oPhil_Giordana_FCD wrote:http://imgur.com/nudJI9S.png
Ok, am I the only one seeing it?
The hosts gave her and her kids a tour of the house. Then, if we follow the grammar, her and her kids spent all the time getting shit-faced on the roof and left condoms everywhere.
Again: her and her kids.
:cdc: :bjarte:
Thank you for going through the trouble.deLurch wrote:Well crap. Better archive this shit if it might blow up beyond her own life.
2015-09-23 The Ironic Slutshame
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930035 ... -slutshame
2015-09-22 Survial & Sex
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930035 ... al-and-sex
2015-09-18 Rape isn't the Worst
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930035 ... -the-worst
2015-09-14 What Rape Culture
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... pe-culture
2015-09-04 I thought I retired from getting raped
https://web.archive.org/web/20150908215 ... ting-raped
2015-09-01 It's OK for things to be hopeless and not OK
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... d-not-okay
2015-08-31 The Boogie Man is Not Your Fear
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... -your-fear
2015-08-30 I couldn't find bandagtes. So we had a conversation about my poop
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... ut-my-poop
2015-08-30 Wishes and Fear
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... -and-fears
2015-08-29 A letter to Elyse (NOT SURE IF THIS SAVED CORRECTLY)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930040 ... r-to-elyse
2015-08-29 Locks, Fights, Love and Unpromises
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930041 ... cksandlove
2015-08-09 Setting the Record Straight
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930041 ... d-straight
2015-08-01 8 Yeas of Parenting (THIS MAY NOT HAVE SAVED CORRECTLY)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930041 ... -parenting
2015-07-30 Enema
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930041 ... 7/30/enema
2015-07-28 You're Not Teaching Your Kids Enough About Sex (THIS MAY NOT HAVE SAVED CORRECTLY)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150930041 ... -about-sex
Now I see it.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:http://imgur.com/nudJI9S.png
Ok, am I the only one seeing it?
The hosts gave her and her kids a tour of the house. Then, if we follow the grammar, her and her kids spent all the time getting shit-faced on the roof and left condoms everywhere.
Again: her and her kids.
:cdc: :bjarte:
I wonder if it's time to beg and plead again.AndrewV69 wrote:
So a pill bowl partydeLurch wrote:https://veuwer.com/i/37eg.jpg
https://archive.is/8xPL9
Blue pills? C 1 ?
Clonazepam 1 mg
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/c-1-17683.htmlThe white retangles all appear to be either a 15 or 30 mg dose of Buspirone Hydrochloride (of various versions or generics)Clonazepam is used in the treatment of benzodiazepine withdrawal; anxiety; bipolar disorder; insomnia; panic disorder (and more), and belongs to the drug classes benzodiazepine anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Clonazepam 1 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
http://www.drugs.com/buspirone.htmlWhite pills bottom, There appears to be an "R-" or stylized "R" or a christian fish with a minus sign. They evidently are all supposed to be a stylized "R"Buspirone is an anti-anxiety medicine that affects chemicals in your brain that may become unbalanced and cause anxiety.
Buspirone is used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as fear, tension, irritability, dizziness, pounding heartbeat, and other physical symptoms.
Buspirone is not an anti-psychotic medication and should not be used in place of medication prescribed by your doctor for mental illness.
I can't determine what they are without seeing the bottom imprint. But if she is saying they are benzos, I am going to guess they could be either:
* Alprazolam (a benzo) I can't determine dose without back imprint, probably 1-2 mg)
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/027-r-7267.html
* Or Lorazepam, another benzo (of unknown dosage, probably 1-2 mg)
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/r-59-7347.html
Here is the full list:
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php?impri ... maxrows=50
The Peach Pills at the bottom, with the stylized "R," if she is claiming they are a benzo, would probably be the 2mg extended release version of Alprazolam.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/r-87-13219.htmlAnd if that is the case, then the above white pills are probably the 1 or 2 mg version of Alprazolam too.Alprazolam is used in the treatment of anxiety; panic disorder; depression; tinnitus; dysautonomia and belongs to the drug class benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Alprazolam 2 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
I can't determine what the Red/Brown/Maroon pills are in the last slot of the big box. If anyone can figure out the lettering, give it a shot.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php
The yellowish/peachish/tannish pill next to it is too difficult to hazard a guess at without an imprint. Odd that she is breaking those pills up, so I would not expect it to be a vitamin. Plenty of anti-psychotics, anti-skitzo, anti-bi-polar pills on the list. Or it could just help her sleep at night. No clue. Feel free to give it a shot.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php?color ... maxrows=50
Guest_0455ae40 wrote:Too late, the Skepchick saw an opportunity to get to Jaclyn Glenn again on her blog and now it's out.
Scott Clifton (@CliftonsNotes) tweeted at 2:24 PM on Thu, Sep 24, 2015:
@slow17mo I really appreciate your support, but Jaclyn and I have been sorting it out privately. Please don't start a witch hunt.
twitter .com/CliftonsNotes/status/646933217522507776?s=03
You are right, she would not...Søren Lilholt wrote:I read it the same way. But I immediately assumed it was a mistake, because surely even someone as monumentally fucked up as Elyse wouldn't...couldn't...could she? :o
Yeah. And I just figured out the round whites are .25mg Alprazolam.Parody Accountant wrote:So a pill bowl partydeLurch wrote:https://veuwer.com/i/37eg.jpg
https://archive.is/8xPL9
Blue pills? C 1 ?
Clonazepam 1 mg
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/c-1-17683.htmlThe white retangles all appear to be either a 15 or 30 mg dose of Buspirone Hydrochloride (of various versions or generics)Clonazepam is used in the treatment of benzodiazepine withdrawal; anxiety; bipolar disorder; insomnia; panic disorder (and more), and belongs to the drug classes benzodiazepine anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Clonazepam 1 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
http://www.drugs.com/buspirone.htmlWhite pills bottom, There appears to be an "R-" or stylized "R" or a christian fish with a minus sign. They evidently are all supposed to be a stylized "R"Buspirone is an anti-anxiety medicine that affects chemicals in your brain that may become unbalanced and cause anxiety.
Buspirone is used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as fear, tension, irritability, dizziness, pounding heartbeat, and other physical symptoms.
Buspirone is not an anti-psychotic medication and should not be used in place of medication prescribed by your doctor for mental illness.
I can't determine what they are without seeing the bottom imprint. But if she is saying they are benzos, I am going to guess they could be either:
* Alprazolam (a benzo) I can't determine dose without back imprint, probably 1-2 mg)
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/027-r-7267.html
* Or Lorazepam, another benzo (of unknown dosage, probably 1-2 mg)
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/r-59-7347.html
Here is the full list:
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php?impri ... maxrows=50
The Peach Pills at the bottom, with the stylized "R," if she is claiming they are a benzo, would probably be the 2mg extended release version of Alprazolam.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/r-87-13219.htmlAnd if that is the case, then the above white pills are probably the 1 or 2 mg version of Alprazolam too.Alprazolam is used in the treatment of anxiety; panic disorder; depression; tinnitus; dysautonomia and belongs to the drug class benzodiazepines. There is positive evidence of human fetal risk during pregnancy. Alprazolam 2 mg is classified as a Schedule 4 controlled substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).
I can't determine what the Red/Brown/Maroon pills are in the last slot of the big box. If anyone can figure out the lettering, give it a shot.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php
The yellowish/peachish/tannish pill next to it is too difficult to hazard a guess at without an imprint. Odd that she is breaking those pills up, so I would not expect it to be a vitamin. Plenty of anti-psychotics, anti-skitzo, anti-bi-polar pills on the list. Or it could just help her sleep at night. No clue. Feel free to give it a shot.
http://www.drugs.com/imprints.php?color ... maxrows=50
Very much this. It's not funny (although obviously people's mileage will vary on that point), there's nothing anyone here can do to help, it's not relevant… And there are far better things to obsess over.rayshul wrote:Can we stop looking at Elyse now this is like watching a car wreck, except after the car is wrecked it keeps trying to ram itself into trees and throw itself over cliffs. We all know this thing is going bad and getting worse and there's fuck all anyone will ever do to stop it so it's best not to think about it and, I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
TedDahlberg wrote:Very much this. It's not funny (although obviously people's mileage will vary on that point), there's nothing anyone here can do to help, it's not relevant… And there are far better things to obsess over.rayshul wrote:Can we stop looking at Elyse now this is like watching a car wreck, except after the car is wrecked it keeps trying to ram itself into trees and throw itself over cliffs. We all know this thing is going bad and getting worse and there's fuck all anyone will ever do to stop it so it's best not to think about it and, I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
I always think our efforts of shitting-on-people-while-laughing are best utilised on people who:TedDahlberg wrote:Very much this. It's not funny (although obviously people's mileage will vary on that point), there's nothing anyone here can do to help, it's not relevant… And there are far better things to obsess over.rayshul wrote:Can we stop looking at Elyse now this is like watching a car wreck, except after the car is wrecked it keeps trying to ram itself into trees and throw itself over cliffs. We all know this thing is going bad and getting worse and there's fuck all anyone will ever do to stop it so it's best not to think about it and, I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
I got the quotes from http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/09/2 ... -wr/205813GARFIELD: Seth I hate to rub your nose in this, but if the AP's deliberations on this matter began with the complaints by the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, it issued a press release this week which congratulated the AP for getting the work "skeptic" out of the conversation but which once again registered discomfort with the term "doubter" which they said "remains problematic and confusing."
BORENSTEIN: They're not satisfied... I don't think the AP's job is to satisfy the Center for Inquiry. They raised a legitimate question in the use of skeptics. And it's triggered this whole thing. And we went for the more precise language. Climate denial is the phrase invented by advocates and used by advocates. So are you, Bob, suggesting that we should adopt an advocacy role here?
How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?rayshul wrote:I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
Kirbmarc wrote:How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?rayshul wrote:I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
The entire UN.
Ape+lust wrote:Melody wants you to know you're all to blame when she's found twittered to death.
http://imgur.com/c9HwZ8P.jpg
deLurch wrote:This right here. She wrote a long ass winded letter to the teachers about what her kids wanted in regards to saying the pledge. Of course it sounded suspiciously like what Elyse wanted, and not the kids of that age.
So what do the kids want? They want to join the boy scouts and girl scouts. Get out in the woods. Carve up some stuff with a pocket knife. Go hiking. Go camping. Build a pinewood derby car. Learn how to tie some knots. Do some crafts.
But no. She needs to tell them about how the kids need to revolt against such things. Shitty ass mother. Kind of like the Jehova Witnesses that won't let their kids celebrate a birthday or Christmas.
He's a piece of work isn't he and is always present in the comment section fighting the good fight. He's is like the toilet slave's toilet slave. I remember posting at the friendly atheist site when he was there, 'If I got cancer and my cancer got aids and I was dying a slow painful death, I would still die happy because I wasn't ahermit.' It quickly got deleted, bloody censorship.Sunder wrote:Ahermit is still over at FA bitching that Dawkins hasn't taken time out of his schedule to personally remove Jaclynn Glenn's Youtube videos from his foundation's website.
What a fucking maroon.
My Poe-dar might need a reset. I am genuinely having trouble deciding if April is trolling or not. :confusion-shrug:AndrewV69 wrote:
Someone once told me to 'fuck off, cunt' on twitter. I was a victim all this time and never knew it. Instead of laughing and sending them a pic of a monkey's arse, I should have been screaming 'Patreon, here I come!'. Always too late to the party.Kirbmarc wrote:
Arthur Chu cited "doxxing" as one of the forms of cyberviolence of men against women.
Cyberviolence can be just as bad as domestic or sexual abuse.
PZ Myers (a man) contributed to the doxxing of Skep Tickle (a woman).
>According to SJWLogic, PZ Myers can be just as bad as a domestic or sexual abuser.
Im Waiting until November 1st to see if grandparents do this first. I was already talked out of doing something before "because the government was already involved".comhcinc wrote:TedDahlberg wrote:Very much this. It's not funny (although obviously people's mileage will vary on that point), there's nothing anyone here can do to help, it's not relevant… And there are far better things to obsess over.rayshul wrote:Can we stop looking at Elyse now this is like watching a car wreck, except after the car is wrecked it keeps trying to ram itself into trees and throw itself over cliffs. We all know this thing is going bad and getting worse and there's fuck all anyone will ever do to stop it so it's best not to think about it and, I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
I kinda agree, except that if people actually feel she is harming her child in some way then they can call child services.
I am seriously. You really believe those children are in harm then fucking do something about it. Report it. Let it be investigated. Send them all the lolz you have spend all this time copying.
And then let it the fuck go. Stop following her on twitter and instagram. Stop reading her blog. Boom her antics are no longer an issue.
I'll add my voice here and agree with our wrestling-obsessed fellow pitter. Enough of this shit. Elyse's situation is on the surface a source of lulz but in reality it's some disturbing tragic shit. It may be "relevant" in seeing real-life effects of SJWism, sure. But as rayshul said, there are people with actual internet power and influence that are more relevant.comhcinc wrote:TedDahlberg wrote:Very much this. It's not funny (although obviously people's mileage will vary on that point), there's nothing anyone here can do to help, it's not relevant… And there are far better things to obsess over.rayshul wrote:Can we stop looking at Elyse now this is like watching a car wreck, except after the car is wrecked it keeps trying to ram itself into trees and throw itself over cliffs. We all know this thing is going bad and getting worse and there's fuck all anyone will ever do to stop it so it's best not to think about it and, I don't know, laugh and point at the UN while welcoming our new feminist overlords.
I kinda agree, except that if people actually feel she is harming her child in some way then they can call child services.
I am seriously. You really believe those children are in harm then fucking do something about it. Report it. Let it be investigated. Send them all the lolz you have spend all this time copying.
And then let it the fuck go. Stop following her on twitter and instagram. Stop reading her blog. Boom her antics are no longer an issue.
