Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -jimthepleb wrote:PA is not Godfrey Elfwick.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:PA: are you by any chance Godfrey Elfwick over at Hemant's?
Nor am I.
More like lack of interest.You are not trying hard enough. Is being hard enough the issue?
He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -jimthepleb wrote:PA is not Godfrey Elfwick.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:PA: are you by any chance Godfrey Elfwick over at Hemant's?
Nor am I.
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
I don't know. Something's fishy about it.Walter Ego wrote:The time has come to confess that I am PA's sock... or maybe he is my sock, I can't remember who came first. You figure it out.
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001155 ... large.jpeg
Me:Pitchguest wrote:I don't know. Something's fishy about it.Walter Ego wrote:The time has come to confess that I am PA's sock... or maybe he is my sock, I can't remember who came first. You figure it out.
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001155 ... large.jpeg
You think?Pitchguest wrote:He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
Yep I'm certain.franc wrote:You think?Pitchguest wrote:He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
• Reply•Share ›
Avatar
Godfrey Elfwick • 2 days ago
These "Slime Pitters" must think we are all stupid.
If any of you "pitters" are reading then riddle me this:
If the Slymepit wasn't as bad as people say it is then WHY would PZ Myers say Michael Nugent is guilty of "harbouring rapists" because he allows Slymepitters to post on his blog?
Answer me that!
P.S. If I was PZ Myers (which I'm not!) I'd go all out and level the same accusation of "harbouring rapists" against ANY and ALL other blog owners who allowed Slime Pitters to run rampant and unmoderated in his comment section.
Not naming any names of course. ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
Pretty much. That was a long, long time scrolling through that.Skep tickle wrote::DPhil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Amateur! I once posted the whole internet at Abbie's ERV.Skep tickle wrote:I haven't done such a long post in quite a long time, but I think I remember how to. *clears throat* Ladies and gentlemen, get your scrolling finger ready.
Right. And they made 935 tweets over a year just to make it extra tricksy? Right?jimthepleb wrote:Yep I'm certain.franc wrote:You think?Pitchguest wrote:He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.
I think it's excellent especially the stuff at Hemant's.
franc wrote:
Right. And they made 935 tweets over a year just to make it extra tricksy? Right?
Yes Franc. Right. About 80% of those tweets are retweets of the most ridiculous SJW shit on twitter.franc wrote:
Right. And they made 935 tweets over a year just to make it extra tricksy? Right?
And at the Charlie Hebdo headquarters, no less!Brive1987 wrote:Another 11 dead in an islamist attack on free speech (absolutely not correlated to religion of course)
This time Paris.
franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
Like the other links you provided, this one also does not show anything but general changes in the brain as we age, and mentions differences in autism, etc. It says nothing specifically about sexual maturity, drinking, skydiving or anything else you've mentioned. Nothing conclusive enough for them or you to declare that MRIs are able to determine what you claim. You hope that someday MRIs can be used to label individuals' maturity levels for various specific behaviours, but it's not something that exists now.ROBOKiTTY wrote:http://www.livescience.com/8604-5-minut ... urity.html
I think the science is here. It's just that policymakers have no incentive to change the status quo, and so the necessary demand for a proliferation of this technique doesn't exist.
In a hypothetical future, the default age of consent might be 25. However, you could take a scan and obtain documentation to demonstrate your maturity. Then you might be a precocious 15, but you'd be free to drink, skydive without parental supervision, have sex with someone likewise demonstrated to be developmentally 25 or above, or whatever an age barrier is used for right now.
Local news (which is not the best) is saying 12 killed now? I hope ya bomb the shit out of someone for this.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:And at the Charlie Hebdo headquarters, no less!Brive1987 wrote:Another 11 dead in an islamist attack on free speech (absolutely not correlated to religion of course)
This time Paris.
It is a solution. Maybe not the best but depending on what you are trying to do it can work pretty good.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Bombing is not a solution.
Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality. I scrolled through a shitload of "his" tweets. Conclusion? Some twerp that is playing both sides of the fence - a la James Billingham - for reasons that are unclear, with really lame "humour" and a shitload of bad poetry.jimthepleb wrote:Yes Franc. Right. About 80% of those tweets are retweets of the most ridiculous SJW shit on twitter.franc wrote:
Right. And they made 935 tweets over a year just to make it extra tricksy? Right?
I could make 200 daft tweets in a month if it was giving me the lulz that account is giving. Look at how much fun PA has with 5 or 6 comments at TFA.
Your poedar is off chap.
If he's not a Poe, he outranks latsot in most amount of lunacy on Twitter at one time. That's just not humanly possible.franc wrote:You think?Pitchguest wrote:He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
The world really needs another twat like oolon. Then all is missing is one of those giant gamma ray bursts from a distant star to wipe out all life from a world who allows that to happen.franc wrote:Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality. I scrolled through a shitload of "his" tweets. Conclusion? Some twerp that is playing both sides of the fence - a la James Billingham - for reasons that are unclear, with really lame "humour" and a shitload of bad poetry.jimthepleb wrote:Yes Franc. Right. About 80% of those tweets are retweets of the most ridiculous SJW shit on twitter.franc wrote:
Right. And they made 935 tweets over a year just to make it extra tricksy? Right?
I could make 200 daft tweets in a month if it was giving me the lulz that account is giving. Look at how much fun PA has with 5 or 6 comments at TFA.
Your poedar is off chap.
Forgive me for exercising skepticism.
Nope. Too many collateral. Hunting down the killers and putting them away is more satisfactory.comhcinc wrote:It is a solution. Maybe not the best but depending on what you are trying to do it can work pretty good.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Bombing is not a solution.
No.franc wrote:
Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality. I scrolled through a shitload of "his" tweets. Conclusion? Some twerp that is playing both sides of the fence - a la James Billingham - for reasons that are unclear, with really lame "humour" and a shitload of bad poetry.
Forgive me for exercising skepticism.
Notice the bold?Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that, without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism
Look we pay a lot of money for planes and bombs and rockets and missiles do you want that money to just go to waste?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Nope. Too many collateral. Hunting down the killers and putting them away is more satisfactory.comhcinc wrote:It is a solution. Maybe not the best but depending on what you are trying to do it can work pretty good.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Bombing is not a solution.
So the local news was right?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:12 dead now.
Yescomhcinc wrote:No.franc wrote:
Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality. I scrolled through a shitload of "his" tweets. Conclusion? Some twerp that is playing both sides of the fence - a la James Billingham - for reasons that are unclear, with really lame "humour" and a shitload of bad poetry.
Forgive me for exercising skepticism.Notice the bold?Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that, without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism
Didn't that paper publish a Mohammed cartoon/caricature some time back, though?Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:So far 11 killed, including 2 cops.
Bombing is not a solution.
I just find it ironic that CH is a far left journal. It's a bit like Tumblr SJW's raiding FTB.
Funny you should say that -Pitchguest wrote:If he's not a Poe, he outranks latsot in most amount of lunacy on Twitter at one time. That's just not humanly possible.
franc wrote:Yescomhcinc wrote:No.franc wrote:
Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality. I scrolled through a shitload of "his" tweets. Conclusion? Some twerp that is playing both sides of the fence - a la James Billingham - for reasons that are unclear, with really lame "humour" and a shitload of bad poetry.
Forgive me for exercising skepticism.Notice the bold?Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that, without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism
What don't you get bout the word "or"?comhcinc wrote:Oh, you are one of them skeptics that pretend something isn't there if you don't like it or you are shown you are wrong. Gotcha, thanks for clearing that up for me.
It's fucking brilliant isn't it?Pitchguest wrote:That's going to be me now everytime someone goes off on a postmodernist rant.Oglebart wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Tony Parsehole wrote: This tickled me.
I understand the word "or" it actually helps my point. You said:franc wrote:What don't you get bout the word "or"?comhcinc wrote:Oh, you are one of them skeptics that pretend something isn't there if you don't like it or you are shown you are wrong. Gotcha, thanks for clearing that up for me.
I pointed out that no, that is not the accepted definition. You seemed to look past that "or" and was only concerned with the part that matches what you think.franc wrote:Poe, by definition, is indistinguishable from reality.
Right. You're one of those pedants. Like fembots that throw dictionaries at you while screaming "it's about equality!"comhcinc wrote:At this point the correct response is :Thank you for pointing out where I was incorrect. :D
Pro-tip #2: if you were as smart as you think you are, you would have bolded OR.comhcinc wrote:At this point the correct response is :Thank you for pointing out where I was incorrect. :D
http://arrowheadequipment.webs.com/flamethrower3.jpgfranc wrote:Right. You're one of those pedants. Like fembots that throw dictionaries at you while screaming "it's about equality!"comhcinc wrote:At this point the correct response is :Thank you for pointing out where I was incorrect. :D
Was this good for you champ? Got that quasi-post coital after glow only internet one upmanship can bring?
Pro-tip: save your gibberish for someone who cares.
Pitchguest wrote:He's a Poe. He's been upvoting mine and others from the Slymepit's comments on Hemant's. Clearly it's Parsehole or ConcH20.franc wrote:He's a not very funny hipster troll-kin, maybe an ool0n wannabe -
https://twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick
http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeednews/re ... .qiLNJV5PvCartoonist Coco, who works for Charlie Hebdo, witnessed the attack, according to Le Figaro, citing l’Humanité:
I was out to get my daughter from kindergarden, when I got to the door of the paper’s building, two armed and hooded men brutally threatened us. They wanted to get in and get up. I typed the code. They shot Wolinski, Cabu (the cartoonists who died in the attack…). It lasted for five minutes… I had taken refuge under a desk… they spoke French perfectly… they claimed they were from Al-Qaeda.
Not only in France, I'd say. The general public's perception of this will be very clear: "Muslims did it". Unless they find that they were really Nazis in disguise or something. The right wing parties will grow stronger, I have no doubt.deLurch wrote:http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeednews/re ... .qiLNJV5PvCartoonist Coco, who works for Charlie Hebdo, witnessed the attack, according to Le Figaro, citing l’Humanité:
I was out to get my daughter from kindergarden, when I got to the door of the paper’s building, two armed and hooded men brutally threatened us. They wanted to get in and get up. I typed the code. They shot Wolinski, Cabu (the cartoonists who died in the attack…). It lasted for five minutes… I had taken refuge under a desk… they spoke French perfectly… they claimed they were from Al-Qaeda.
So do you think immigration into France is going to be tightened down in the near future?
No see it isn't something minor. The argue is some people can tell the guy is a Poe and you can't. You used a wrong definition in an attempt to prove your point. That is why the correct definition is important.franc wrote:Right. You're one of those pedants. Like fembots that throw dictionaries at you while screaming "it's about equality!"comhcinc wrote:At this point the correct response is :Thank you for pointing out where I was incorrect. :D
Was this good for you champ? Got that quasi-post coital after glow only internet one upmanship can bring?
Pro-tip: save your gibberish for someone who cares.
I can tell you walk around with a very high opinion of yourself and that is important. That is why you won't admit that you are wrong. It will be helpful in your life to learn that everyone doesn't think like you. Which word I bolded is beside the fact that you ignore the correct definition because it did not help your case.franc wrote:Pro-tip #2: if you were as smart as you think you are, you would have bolded OR.
I don't think any of us suspect that it was Jewish extremists, lacking a sense of humor about satirical representations. I can think of a couple of religions known for humorlessness - one being Mormonism, but I seriously doubt they were Mormon terrorists (those usually come to your door directly, ride bicycles, and are generally polite and well-mannered, if a bit creepy). The other humorless religion would be ... dare I say it ... Islam.Southern wrote: Not only in France, I'd say. The general public's perception of this will be very clear: "Muslims did it". Unless they find that they were really Nazis in disguise or something. The right wing parties will grow stronger, I have no doubt.
BarnOwl wrote:I don't think any of us suspect that it was Jewish extremists, lacking a sense of humor about satirical representations. I can think of a couple of religions known for humorlessness - one being Mormonism, but I seriously doubt they were Mormon terrorists (those usually come to your door directly, ride bicycles, and are generally polite and well-mannered, if a bit creepy). The other humorless religion would be ... dare I say it ... Islam.Southern wrote: Not only in France, I'd say. The general public's perception of this will be very clear: "Muslims did it". Unless they find that they were really Nazis in disguise or something. The right wing parties will grow stronger, I have no doubt.
I mean "Nazis in disguise" as a remote possibility that some right wing lunatic would frame Muslims for the attack to grown in political strength. I'm sure that was a plot from a movie or two that I'm forgetting about, but... who knows, maybe there is someone stupid enough to try it. It's a very unlikely OR impossible hypothesis, and I'd never vouch for it without strong evidence, of course. But I find the fact that terrorists choose to attack exactly at the moment when the right wing is pushing for tightening the immigration laws to be worth of a bad political thriller's plot.BarnOwl wrote:I don't think any of us suspect that it was Jewish extremists, lacking a sense of humor about satirical representations. I can think of a couple of religions known for humorlessness - one being Mormonism, but I seriously doubt they were Mormon terrorists (those usually come to your door directly, ride bicycles, and are generally polite and well-mannered, if a bit creepy). The other humorless religion would be ... dare I say it ... Islam.Southern wrote: Not only in France, I'd say. The general public's perception of this will be very clear: "Muslims did it". Unless they find that they were really Nazis in disguise or something. The right wing parties will grow stronger, I have no doubt.
In that case I bet he was behind it all!Lsuoma wrote:Marine le Pen just got a BIG boost. Next president of France, I think.
No one hurt, there wasn't even a lot of damage. It just happened yesterday and there is no more information other they the are looking to talk to a pickup driver.An explosion outside an NAACP office building in Colorado on Tuesday morning that rattled neighbors was caused deliberately, officials say.
An improvised explosive device was detonated against the exterior wall of the NAACP building on South El Paso Street in Colorado Springs around 10:45 a.m. Mountain time. No one was injured, said Amy Sanders, a spokeswoman for the FBI in Denver.
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2014 ... e-meme.jpgSouthern wrote: OR
Could be...Tony Parsehole wrote:In that case I bet he was behind it all!Lsuoma wrote:Marine le Pen just got a BIG boost. Next president of France, I think.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... _hat_2.jpg
