Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

[Tribble]

I'm not all that bright and social inept. If I can figure out in five minutes who was accused of what, where, and by whom, plus find a photo of the accuser with her BF, then this ain't a secret.

Maybe you could find and post on a blog the name of a famous sceptic, author and cyclist accused of rape.

PZ Myers... Oh, wait, he doesn't cycle...

[Michael J]

From Nugent's latest post:

Chigua, Ichthyc and Nerd of Redhead then scolded Tom Foss for his skepticism, with Nerd suggesting that Tom should:

“Read Nugent’s blogs asshole, like you don’t believe a word he says, rather than with worship. DUH. Apply the same skepticism you want us to use, upon Nugent. Come back when you are done. In a couple of years or so.”

Of course we're all familiar with NoR's abysmal level of critical thinking. I'd just like to point out that chigau and Icthyic can also be numbered amongst Pharyngula's most cognitively desolate commenters. They're both dishonest as feck, probably by accident, or through inability to comprehend simple facts and short trains of logic.

I'm sort of surprised by Icthyic. He was always acerbic under another nym at Pandas Thumb, and continued that at Pharyngula. I had several email discussions with him when he was planning to move to a favourite country of mine, and he seemed so, normal. But he seems to have suspended his critical thought in favour of reactionary thought.

Same with Louis. I think that it is a human nature thing. When a community changes, I think that some people jump ship and others will twist themselves in knots to convince themselves that they are still in the right. Their behaviour is identical to the behaviour we used to see on Creationist sites.

I don't think that these people start out authoritarian and post-structuralist but they have to go this way because it is the only way to maintain the fiction that they are correct.

[Brive1987]

Here's Ophie's blogpost I referred to: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ith-women/

The 'Original Cindy' mentioned in the comments is the person who actually named the name - as you can see, her comments have been purged. In fact, the comments are a bit of mess there, owing to Ofie's protect-the-women stance. Ie, protect herself from being sued unto the bra off her back.

The final comment there is pretty *snort*worthy, IMO:

Alethea H. "Crocoduck" Dundee says

September 26, 2012 at 1:54 am

Hi Ophelia, glad to see the cleanup; I would not want you in legal danger.

It's comical how Ophelia always makes sure you know she's got the lowdown, she's in the loop, connected, hooked up, when she's too chicken to do anything about it.

http://imgur.com/53pumbt.png

And that jackass _Martin Robbins_ was a SitP regular at the time, he had to know. He went after Bora Zivkovic like he was chasing a werewolf and the guy never groped anyone. But he was an ocean apart and no danger to brave _Martin_.

And how did the Stollznow gambit play out for them? Ophie should have followed her first non-herd instinct and STFU. So far all they have managed to do is line a lawyers pockets with 60K of SJ bread money.

[Suet Cardigan]

[youtube]bVHYvUpeqKI[/youtube]

best youtube comment...


Can I push it in? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can you put your finger in my butt? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again? Can I pull back? Can I push back in again?....

Do you also have to ask for permission to ejaculate? :think:

[Tribble]

So if you falsely accuse someone of murder in the US, should you get the death penalty?

False accusers get away scot-free too many times, but there's a proportionality to sentences that should never be forgotten. Laws are aimed to prevent crimes, by isolating the offenders from society and by dissuading others from following their steps. They're not a tool to mete out emotionally charged punishment on the criminals.

Violent crimes get longer sentences because the offenders exposed themselves as persons who are prone to violence and require a long time of rehabilitation before they are reintroduced to society.Some violent crimes are even deemed to be committed by people who are very unlikely to be rehabilitated and too risky to be let out of prison.

A false accusation, however, isn't a violent crime. People who falsely accuse others aren't likely to harm others with their lies after they've been publicly exposed as a liar. If people know that you falsely accused someone, they're not going to believe you. False accusers may be morally depraved people, but they're far less harmful to society than violent criminal, once they've been publicly exposed as frauds. On the other hand someone who falsely accuse someone else doesn't do it on a whim (unless they're a pathological liar) and will probably at least entertain the idea of being exposed (even if they're are pathological liar). Five to ten years for a false accusation of rape should be enough to make people think twice before falsely accusing someone else.

We'll have to disagree on that one. A person vile enough to be ready to unjustly send someone to death row is no better than a killer being condemned to death row. I am anti-death penalty, but since that's the way the US system still works in many states, that's the metric I'll be using.

So, willing and knowingly sending an innocent to death row should earn the false accuser a final trip to death row. And fuck humanism when it comes to such scumbags as would send an innocent person to their death.

I see your point, Phil. Instead of using the gun, you're using lies and the Courts to kill someone. In either case, the person ends up dead because of your manipulation rather than your direct actions. I can't see one as being any less morally bankrupt as the other.

[ThreeFlangedJavis]

[

On a tangential issue, I also think that a prosecutor who knowingly hides exculpatory evidence in a capital murder case should be tried for attempted manslaughter. I know that prosecutors are immune, at least in the US.

OK, "attempted manslaughter" would be murder. So prosecute for murder then.

[Ape+lust]

It's comical how Ophelia always makes sure you know she's got the lowdown, she's in the loop, connected, hooked up, when she's too chicken to do anything about it.

http://imgur.com/53pumbt.png

And that jackass _Martin Robbins_ was a SitP regular at the time, he had to know. He went after Bora Zivkovic like he was chasing a werewolf and the guy never groped anyone. But he was an ocean apart and no danger to brave _Martin_.

And how did the Stollznow gambit play out for them? Ophie should have followed her first non-herd instinct and STFU. So far all they have managed to do is line a lawyers pockets with 60K of SJ bread money.

Yeah, that's funny. Their zeal for gutting Shermer kind of lost steam too. They were boiling over with feelz for the mystery woman, but then she pops up and it turns out she's a chirpy little thing (you can call it rape or not, I don't mind) who was amongst us talking about her alleged rape the whole time. Whoops. She finally has a name and nobody uses it :lol:

[Brive1987]

Yeah, that's funny. Their zeal for gutting Shermer kind of lost steam too. They were boiling over with feelz for the mystery woman, but then she pops up and it turns out she's a chirpy little thing (you can call it rape or not, I don't mind) who was amongst us talking about her alleged rape the whole time. Whoops. She finally has a name and nobody uses it :lol:

It is amazing how they start with such simple narratives.

But hit the stories with the spotlight of reality, hunt down some facts and the morality play quickly freezes for the shot.

Pity there is always collateral damage.

http://i.imgur.com/FR7hgwE.jpg

[piero]

False accusers, of whatever crime, should serve the maximum jail time usually sentenced to the person accused of the crime. Plus a few extra years for obvious malicious intent.

I do not feel merciful towards false accusations and accusers.

So if you falsely accuse someone of murder in the US, should you get the death penalty?

False accusers get away scot-free too many times, but there's a proportionality to sentences that should never be forgotten. Laws are aimed to prevent crimes, by isolating the offenders from society and by dissuading others from following their steps. They're not a tool to mete out emotionally charged punishment on the criminals.

Violent crimes get longer sentences because the offenders exposed themselves as persons who are prone to violence and require a long time of rehabilitation before they are reintroduced to society.Some violent crimes are even deemed to be committed by people who are very unlikely to be rehabilitated and too risky to be let out of prison.

A false accusation, however, isn't a violent crime. People who falsely accuse others aren't likely to harm others with their lies after they've been publicly exposed as a liar. If people know that you falsely accused someone, they're not going to believe you. False accusers may be morally depraved people, but they're far less harmful to society than violent criminal, once they've been publicly exposed as frauds. On the other hand someone who falsely accuse someone else doesn't do it on a whim (unless they're a pathological liar) and will probably at least entertain the idea of being exposed (even if they're are pathological liar). Five to ten years for a false accusation of rape should be enough to make people think twice before falsely accusing someone else.

We'll have to disagree on that one. A person vile enough to be ready to unjustly send someone to death row is no better than a killer being condemned to death row. I am anti-death penalty, but since that's the way the US system still works in many states, that's the metric I'll be using.

So, willing and knowingly sending an innocent to death row should earn the false accuser a final trip to death row. And fuck humanism when it comes to such scumbags as would send an innocent person to their death.

I agree with Phil that knowingly and willingly sending someone to death row is morally indistinguishable from premeditated murder. However, I also agree with Kirbmarc that five to ten years for a false accusation of rape, assault, murder and violent crimes in general "should be enough to make people think twice before falsely accusing someone else." If they are successfully prosecuted, that is. The problem of crime has very little to do with the harshness of punishments (the US has the harshest penalties and the highest rates of violent crimes amongt First World countries). What actually works as a deterrent is the certainty of the punishment, i.e. the knowledge that you have a very slim chance of getting away with it. But that requires a non-corrupt, efficient and multidisciplinary police.

[Steersman]

Lsuoma, FWIW, a comment of mine in response to one of yours on Michael’s blog “awaiting moderation”:

Steersman December 1, 2014 at 9:41 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Lsuoma (#53):

“Fexbolt” himself did so on Pharyngula some 2 weeks ago:
“_http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/10/07/turning-over-a-rock-and-exposing-slime-to-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-879770″

[comhcinc]

How did you manage that? Did you hack into the ISP's customer database?

He owns the database.

[Satan]

False accusers get away scot-free too many times, but there's a proportionality to sentences that should never be forgotten. Laws are aimed to prevent crimes, by isolating the offenders from society and by dissuading others from following their steps.

Under that approach, the punishments for malicious false accusations should be equivalent to those for kidnapping and forcible confinement. Or, in cases of malicious false accusations involving capital crimes, equivalent to those for contract killing.

Malicious false accusations are, essentially, attempts to co-opt the legal system into acting as private jailers and/or contract killers. For the victim, there's no difference in outcome between being confined or executed by a criminal group and being confined or executed by the state working on behalf of a private party. As such, the punishments for co-opting the justice system should be equal to the punishments for hiring criminals to inflict similar punishments on a third party.

[piero]

False accusers get away scot-free too many times, but there's a proportionality to sentences that should never be forgotten. Laws are aimed to prevent crimes, by isolating the offenders from society and by dissuading others from following their steps.

Under that approach, the punishments for malicious false accusations should be equivalent to those for kidnapping and forcible confinement. Or, in cases of malicious false accusations involving capital crimes, equivalent to those for contract killing.

Malicious false accusations are, essentially, attempts to co-opt the legal system into acting as private jailers and/or contract killers. For the victim, there's no difference in outcome between being confined or executed by a criminal group and being confined or executed by the state working on behalf of a private party. As such, the punishments for co-opting the justice system should be equal to the punishments for hiring criminals to inflict similar punishments on a third party.

I like it.

[jimthepleb]

I'm not all that bright and social inept. If I can figure out in five minutes who was accused of what, where, and by whom, plus find a photo of the accuser with her BF, then this ain't a secret.

Maybe you could find and post on a blog the name of a famous sceptic, author and cyclist accused of rape.

PZ Myers... Oh, wait, he doesn't cycle...

Nope he's in a perpetual pre-menstrual fug.

[comhcinc]

http://uk.businessinsider.com/joe-scarb ... n-2014-12

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough has had it with the Ferguson, Missouri, protests.

Scarborough devoted a lengthy segment on Monday's "Morning Joe" to chastising both the protests and related media coverage. In particular, the former GOP congressman raged against the St. Louis Rams players who expressed solidarity with the demonstrators by raising their hands as they entered the field during their football game on Sunday.

"I'm sorry, this Ram thing, this was the final straw for me," an exasperated Scarborough said. "I have sat here quietly and listened to BS being spewed all over this network and all over other networks. I can't take it anymore."

Ferguson has been the epicenter of racially charged protests since 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed in August by a white police officer. Violent looters and arsonists roiled the city again last week when a grand jury announced its decision not to indict the officer, Darren Wilson.

Scarborough said he agreed with the protesters that the justice system racially discriminated against young black men, but he insisted that Brown's case was not necessarily the ideal example. He cited Brown allegedly robbing a convenience store before his fatal encounter with Wilson.

"There are so many great people to embrace as heroes in the black community that deciding you're going to embrace a guy who knocked over a convenience store, and then according to grand jury testimony, acted in ways that would get my children shot … that's your hero? That's the reason you want to burn down black businesses?" Scarborough asked.

Scarborough also called out some of his show's guests for agreeing with him privately but refusing to express their views on air.

"You know what pisses me off too is I have people around this set all the time. They let me say what I say on set and they sit and stare at me, slack-jawed," he said. "They're afraid to say anything on the air, even though they know it's BS. People [are] saying one thing when the camera's on and then saying something completely different when the camera gets turned off, because they're somehow afraid they'll be called racist if they tell the truth."

Scarborough went on to preemptively dismiss any criticism he receives on the subject.

"If I've offended anybody offended anybody by saying what I've said, trust me, 95% of America thinks just like me. Just because there are cowards that won't say that on TV — that's your problem, it's not mine," he said.

I am sure there will be some rage blogging.

[comhcinc]

http://uk.businessinsider.com/joe-scarb ... on-2014-12

[katamari Damassi]

There was an interesting interview with Chris Rock. They didn't use the term SJW but it was what they were talking about.

Kids raised on a culture of “We’re not going to keep score in the game because we don’t want anybody to lose.” Or just ignoring race to a fault. You can’t say “the black kid over there.” No, it’s “the guy with the red shoes.” You can’t even be offensive on your way to being inoffensive.

He also said that comic Dave Chappelle bans phones in clubs where he performs and Rock is considering doing the same thing, because he doesn't want SJW's to create a twitter shit storm every time he tries out new material.

[katamari Damassi]

link to Rock interview: http://www.vulture.com/2014/11/chris-ro ... ation.html

[John D]

So if you falsely accuse someone of murder in the US, should you get the death penalty?

False accusers get away scot-free too many times, but there's a proportionality to sentences that should never be forgotten. Laws are aimed to prevent crimes, by isolating the offenders from society and by dissuading others from following their steps. They're not a tool to mete out emotionally charged punishment on the criminals.

Violent crimes get longer sentences because the offenders exposed themselves as persons who are prone to violence and require a long time of rehabilitation before they are reintroduced to society.Some violent crimes are even deemed to be committed by people who are very unlikely to be rehabilitated and too risky to be let out of prison.

A false accusation, however, isn't a violent crime. People who falsely accuse others aren't likely to harm others with their lies after they've been publicly exposed as a liar. If people know that you falsely accused someone, they're not going to believe you. False accusers may be morally depraved people, but they're far less harmful to society than violent criminal, once they've been publicly exposed as frauds. On the other hand someone who falsely accuse someone else doesn't do it on a whim (unless they're a pathological liar) and will probably at least entertain the idea of being exposed (even if they're are pathological liar). Five to ten years for a false accusation of rape should be enough to make people think twice before falsely accusing someone else.

We'll have to disagree on that one. A person vile enough to be ready to unjustly send someone to death row is no better than a killer being condemned to death row. I am anti-death penalty, but since that's the way the US system still works in many states, that's the metric I'll be using.

So, willing and knowingly sending an innocent to death row should earn the false accuser a final trip to death row. And fuck humanism when it comes to such scumbags as would send an innocent person to their death.

I agree with Phil that knowingly and willingly sending someone to death row is morally indistinguishable from premeditated murder. However, I also agree with Kirbmarc that five to ten years for a false accusation of rape, assault, murder and violent crimes in general "should be enough to make people think twice before falsely accusing someone else." If they are successfully prosecuted, that is. The problem of crime has very little to do with the harshness of punishments (the US has the harshest penalties and the highest rates of violent crimes amongt First World countries). What actually works as a deterrent is the certainty of the punishment, i.e. the knowledge that you have a very slim chance of getting away with it. But that requires a non-corrupt, efficient and multidisciplinary police.

Please don't simplify too much.

While the US has the highest homicide rate, we are not even close to having the highest overall violent crime rate for Western countries. Assault is lower in that US than many other Western countries. The chance of you being involved in a violent crime in the US is lower than countries like England or Australia (but you are more likely to be killed in the US). There is also a decent body of research that shows harsh punishment does have some affect on crime rates. The US is (of course) special because of our love of firearms. This makes comparisons difficult.

The US has also seen one of the most dramatic decreases in crime among western countries in the last 20 years. Just sayin... the story is not so simple. Here are some stats...

http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and ... ustice.pdf

[Cunning Punt]

This SJ lesson on consensual sex is your ticket to avoiding accidental rape.

Naw. It's as cringe-y as Christian comedy, skeevy as 8mm porn. And stoooopid. Turn your sound down, the slurping soundtrack is epic.

[youtube]bVHYvUpeqKI[/youtube]

"Can I put my penis in your vagina?"

Peezus Christ.

[Nec_V20]

It appears that nobody here gives a fuck about someone being doxxed on this site.

From the IP address that was posted in the image I know exactly who the guy is and where he lives.

It's not fucking rocket science and it shows just how fucking ignorant you peasants are that nobody before me noticed it.

So if you can't be fucked getting rid of the image then I suppose nobody would mind if I posted the guy's full name and home address here on this thread.

How did you manage that? Did you hack into the ISP's customer database?

I will publish the details of the person in increments until the the image of the persons IP address is deleted from this site.

Name: Axxx Dxxxxx
Address: Mxxxxxxxxxxx
Address 2: Lxxxxxxxxxxx
Address 3: Dxxxxx xx
Address 4: Ixxxxxx

To be honest it is fucking easy do find out stuff like this.

The thing is that the people who published the IP address obviously are oblivious to what they were doing, although they really like to have a go at me with regard to not knowing what the fuck I do as a techie.

I am not going to tell you how I did it because although it is easy for me as a real techie it is still difficult for the wannabe's who try to slag me off incessantly.

[another lurker]

If it was that easy, no one would ever need a court order to track down an anonymous person online..

[Nec_V20]

If it was that easy, no one would ever need a court order to track down an anonymous person online..

You can only be anonymous if you work at it.

[John Greg]

Listen, Jackass, maybe if you provided a link to the fucking picture you're so fucking hot-and-bothered about, one of us moderators could take a fucking look at it. But unless you provide a link (you can do so in a PM if you want), or an "official" notification, I, for one, am not going to start searching all over the fucking Pit to find the fucking picture. You fuck.

[Matt Cavanaugh]

"PZ Myers" and "career advancement". There's words you don't see grouped together too often.

Guess he lost that battle.

http://i.imgur.com/9OMpYL6.jpg

If I had a dollar for every time this dimwit used the word "oblivious", I could retire.

[katamari Damassi]

This SJ lesson on consensual sex is your ticket to avoiding accidental rape.

Naw. It's as cringe-y as Christian comedy, skeevy as 8mm porn. And stoooopid. Turn your sound down, the slurping soundtrack is epic.

[youtube]bVHYvUpeqKI[/youtube]

"Can I put my penis in your vagina?"

Peezus Christ.

Then you read feminists being candid and they say that those wimps who ask everything kill their lady-boners.

[comhcinc]

Listen, Jackass, maybe if you provided a link to the fucking picture you're so fucking hot-and-bothered about, one of us moderators could take a fucking look at it. But unless you provide a link (you can do so in a PM if you want), or an "official" notification, I, for one, am not going to start searching all over the fucking Pit to find the fucking picture. You fuck.

He doesn't what he is talking about. But then again you could just let him "dox" the person and then ban him.

[Nec_V20]

If it was that easy, no one would ever need a court order to track down an anonymous person online..

What's really funny is that the cartoon that Lsuoma lumbered me with has now come to bite him in the ass.

Well fuck that little thieving piece of shite.

[Phil_Giordana_FCD]

Nec: try to get over yourself. And be careful with that progressive doxxing. It WILL get you banned.

Now, the IP owner was foolish enough to post it themselves. Not the Pit's problem. But there's no need to drive the nail any further by publicizing their info here.

As an aside, Lousy Canuck once released moderated comments from Slymepitters on his blog, showing email and IP addresses of said commenters. It took him more than a day and a few critics from his own commentariat before he finally realized it was a dick move. I pointed it out to him, quoting the FTB policy that all personal infos would be kept secret, but he then replied that he had every right to display personal info if he thought the comments posted were abusive. No chance of a freeze page, as far as my limited IT skills are concerned. Maybe Strawkins can fish it out.

[BarnOwl]

Here's Ophie's blogpost I referred to: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ith-women/

The 'Original Cindy' mentioned in the comments is the person who actually named the name - as you can see, her comments have been purged. In fact, the comments are a bit of mess there, owing to Ofie's protect-the-women stance. Ie, protect herself from being sued unto the bra off her back.

The final comment there is pretty *snort*worthy, IMO:

Alethea H. "Crocoduck" Dundee says

September 26, 2012 at 1:54 am

Hi Ophelia, glad to see the cleanup; I would not want you in legal danger.

I'm sure I brought this up at the time Ophelia's post was made, but I still don't understand why no one who frequents the SitP meetings ever did anything about the serial groper, apparently. Let's leave words and potential lawsuits out of it and go for the direct approach. If the groper is serially groping in the pub in full view of multiple witnesses, why has none of these witnesses taken him aside for a little talking-to, or perhaps, if he persists in his groping without remorse and goes nyah nyah, a good pop in the face? And to be fair and equitable, the gropees have some agency in this as well. First there's the direct words approach of just asking the dude not to touch you again. You can be polite, or you can make it clear that of his three knees that are accessible, you will take out not the right knee, not the left knee, but the weenie first. If that doesn't work, you might have to push or move his gropey hands away from whatever body parts he's touching. A really persistent groper might require a more physical self-defense approach, but hey, you've got a pub full of (supposedly) supportive people to back you up, right?

I really don't understand why this guy would be a problem groper in the same group of adults for a prolonged period. Why has no one decked him? Is it a politeness thing, fear of embarrassment? I do not grok these mysterious English ways.

[Steersman]

Listen, Jackass, maybe if you provided a link to the fucking picture you're so fucking hot-and-bothered about, one of us moderators could take a fucking look at it. But unless you provide a link (you can do so in a PM if you want), or an "official" notification, I, for one, am not going to start searching all over the fucking Pit to find the fucking picture. You fuck.

John, my comment above, now showing up on Nugent's blog so he must have vetted it, points to "Fexbolt's" comment on Pharyngula which links to a photobucket image: same image as the one Michael published. And, as mentioned, it was published some 2 weeks ago.

[Nec_V20]

Listen, Jackass, maybe if you provided a link to the fucking picture you're so fucking hot-and-bothered about, one of us moderators could take a fucking look at it. But unless you provide a link (you can do so in a PM if you want), or an "official" notification, I, for one, am not going to start searching all over the fucking Pit to find the fucking picture. You fuck.

You know what jackass, I gave you the fucking info and all you would have needed to do is go one page back.

I am not going to do your fucking job for you by reporting someone for an infringement that they were not aware of committing.

I might be a bastard, but I am not that kind of bastard.

So fucking do your job and don't whine like a little pantyhosed bitch.

[Phil_Giordana_FCD]

Bah, here is the post as it appears now. Nothing like the original.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... ion-queue/

[Nec_V20]

Nec: try to get over yourself. And be careful with that progressive doxxing. It WILL get you banned.

Now, the IP owner was foolish enough to post it themselves. Not the Pit's problem. But there's no need to drive the nail any further by publicizing their info here.

As an aside, Lousy Canuck once released moderated comments from Slymepitters on his blog, showing email and IP addresses of said commenters. It took him more than a day and a few critics from his own commentariat before he finally realized it was a dick move. I pointed it out to him, quoting the FTB policy that all personal infos would be kept secret, but he then replied that he had every right to display personal info if he thought the comments posted were abusive. No chance of a freeze page, as far as my limited IT skills are concerned. Maybe Strawkins can fish it out.

THE FUCKING PIT POSTED THE IP ADDRESS!

Get fucking rid of it!

No excuses.

[comhcinc]

Here Nec, dox me.

24.181.98.166

[Matt Cavanaugh]

It's also rape to look at someone (usually at a female SJW).

Fuck these loons.

If you want to have sex with Lindy West, it's rape.
If you don't want to have sex with Lindy West, it's fat-shaming and rape.
If you tell Lindy West you don't want to have sex with her, it's harassment, fat-shaming and rape.
If you respond to this comment, it's stalking, harassment, fat-shaming, and rape.
If you don't respond to this comment, you're erasing Lindy West's femininity.

Lindy West can go fuck herself.

[Steersman]

Here's Ophie's blogpost I referred to: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... ith-women/
....

....
I really don't understand why this guy would be a problem groper in the same group of adults for a prolonged period. Why has no one decked him? Is it a politeness thing, fear of embarrassment? I do not grok these mysterious English ways.

Definitely a "strange land" .... :-)

[Phil_Giordana_FCD]

Nec: try to get over yourself. And be careful with that progressive doxxing. It WILL get you banned.

Now, the IP owner was foolish enough to post it themselves. Not the Pit's problem. But there's no need to drive the nail any further by publicizing their info here.

As an aside, Lousy Canuck once released moderated comments from Slymepitters on his blog, showing email and IP addresses of said commenters. It took him more than a day and a few critics from his own commentariat before he finally realized it was a dick move. I pointed it out to him, quoting the FTB policy that all personal infos would be kept secret, but he then replied that he had every right to display personal info if he thought the comments posted were abusive. No chance of a freeze page, as far as my limited IT skills are concerned. Maybe Strawkins can fish it out.

THE FUCKING PIT POSTED THE IP ADDRESS!

Get fucking rid of it!

No excuses.

So did Michael Nugent and the guy whose IP it is.

Are you going to get on a "Godwin! Close this thread" rant again? Because if so, thanks but I'm not interested.

[Matt Cavanaugh]

"Can I put my penis in your vagina?"

Don't try this with a school teacher.

"You can. But correct the question is, 'may I'""

[another lurker]

You can't doxx someone from an IP address unless you are a super elite hacker, the FBI, or a sysadmin who works for the ISP and just happens to also have access to the entire customer db. If it was that easy to track people down through their IP addresses, well, there would be a lot of folks getting doxxed and murdered for saying stupid shit online.

[comhcinc]

Again Nec, dox me. I want to see you do it. Come on; show us what you got.

24.181.98.166

That's all you need right?

[jimthepleb]

It's such a relief to have Nec around to 'help.'

[comhcinc]

"Can I put my penis in your vagina?"

Don't try this with a school teacher.

"You can. But correct the question is, 'may I'""

Oh shit you're right! Permission was never granted for any thing in that video!

Good catch.

[BarnOwl]

It's also rape to look at someone (usually at a female SJW).

Fuck these loons.

If you want to have sex with Lindy West, it's rape.
If you don't want to have sex with Lindy West, it's fat-shaming and rape.
If you tell Lindy West you don't want to have sex with her, it's harassment, fat-shaming and rape.
If you respond to this comment, it's stalking, harassment, fat-shaming, and rape.
If you don't respond to this comment, you're erasing Lindy West's femininity.

Lindy West can go fuck herself.

Now look what you've done. The 'Pit is harboring rapists, fat-shamers, harassers, and stalkers.

[Lsuoma]

Cats puking to techno:

[youtube]rMDTXUO3dYE[/youtube]

[deLurch]

Her 15 minutes of fame?

I am curious to know what she thinks the bad effects were. As far as I can tell, pretty much all of the bad things were choices that she made herself.

[Nec_V20]

Here Nec, dox me.

24.181.98.166

Name: Cxxxxxxxxxx Fxxxx

I have the rest, but do you want me to publish it?

[jugheadnaut]

We'll have to disagree on that one. A person vile enough to be ready to unjustly send someone to death row is no better than a killer being condemned to death row. I am anti-death penalty, but since that's the way the US system still works in many states, that's the metric I'll be using.

So, willing and knowingly sending an innocent to death row should earn the false accuser a final trip to death row. And fuck humanism when it comes to such scumbags as would send an innocent person to their death.

I see your point, Phil. Instead of using the gun, you're using lies and the Courts to kill someone. In either case, the person ends up dead because of your manipulation rather than your direct actions. I can't see one as being any less morally bankrupt as the other.

Phil's thoughts on this aren't just theoretical. I recall learning during the OJ Simpson trial that was a law in California at the time that made the planting of evidence in a capital case to also be a capital case. If it could have been proven that Mark Fuhrman planted the glove, Fuhrman himself could have been subject to the death penalty.

[another lurker]

I have seen you in many places, and may I say that your malevolent pressure has inspired me to hunt the wild watermelon in South Hawaii.

[comhcinc]

Here Nec, dox me.

24.181.98.166

Name: Cxxxxxxxxxx Fxxxx

I have the rest, but do you want me to publish it?

Yes please do.

[Matt Cavanaugh]

It's also rape to look at someone (usually at a female SJW).

Fuck these loons.

If you want to have sex with Lindy West, it's rape.
If you don't want to have sex with Lindy West, it's fat-shaming and rape.
If you tell Lindy West you don't want to have sex with her, it's harassment, fat-shaming and rape.
If you respond to this comment, it's stalking, harassment, fat-shaming, and rape.
If you don't respond to this comment, you're erasing Lindy West's femininity.

Lindy West can go fuck herself.

Now look what you've done. The 'Pit is harboring rapists, fat-shamers, harassers, and stalkers.

Don't blame me, Stalker!

[NoGodsEver]

I'm beginning to think the only time NEC has ever used a computer is to post on the Pit.

[another lurker]

[youtube]Kq4OtRsdXls[/youtube]

[BlueShiftRhino]

Lsuoma -

I would like to combine two current topics with a suggestion.

On one hand, we have the discussion of the ancient Chinese practice of applying the punishment for the crime to anyone who makes a false accusation.

On the other hand, we have Nec accusing various people of doxxing someone on The 'Pit (which can't be ignored as so many are feeding this troll).

Connect the dots.

cheers

[comhcinc]

I'm still waiting Nec. Bring it. Show us your skillz.

[Lsuoma]

I've already told everyone that Necco is Spartacus. What more do you want from me? Blood?

[Nec_V20]

I'm beginning to think the only time NEC has ever used a computer is to post on the Pit.

Really fuckwit?

The only mission statement on this site is no doxxing.

Now that I have brought a potential doxxing incident to the site the mission statement has been changed to, "Doxx all the fuck you want, because Nec_V20 has control over our policies"?

[another lurker]

My neighbour just purchased one of these:



http://www.noeljackman.com.au/wp-conten ... -Dozer.jpg


Got a deal on it. He doesn't have room for it on his property. Heh. I'll let him know that he can keep it here if he wants.

[KiwiInOz]

Here Nec, dox me.

24.181.98.166

Dox me?! Dox you, arsehole!

[NoGodsEver]

I'm beginning to think the only time NEC has ever used a computer is to post on the Pit.

Really fuckwit?

The only mission statement on this site is no doxxing.

Now that I have brought a potential doxxing incident to the site the mission statement has been changed to, "Doxx all the fuck you want, because Nec_V20 has control over our policies"?

Fuck off, cunt.