Re: STFU about Zimmerman. Nobody else gives a crap.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:22 pm
Personally, I'd have no problem with Muslamic Mean Time as the international reference, as long as Big Ben still points to Mecca five times a day.
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
I already posted that one!Mentioning Pat Condell will nuke the comment section
Didn't want to set expectations too high right away. But I will make amends for my double posting. I hear you guys love pointy tits.Cunt of Personality wrote:First post is a double post. Legendary. You'll fit right in here.T Rekt wrote:New here (more or less).
I've never been so happy reading PZ's blog. Good work!
Yes, quite agree. Essentially T.H. Huxley’s argument that I quoted earlier: Delenda est.Matt Cavanaugh wrote:The right to free speech does include the right to speak out against free speech. The accommodating mechanism for that is the right to free speech in & of itself.Skep tickle wrote:To riff off of "America - love it or leave it!" from the '60's or 70's, what you & Steers have written looks to me like: "You're in a country that supports free speech - support that stance yourself or leave for a country that doesn't!"Matt Cavanaugh wrote:And honestly, every muslim in France needs to be out on the streets tomorrow morning -- not protesting the murders, but rather supporting free speech. If not, they should get the fuck out.
It's the old problem of how to be a tolerant society/group/etc yet include people who are intolerant. ....
What has been going on for too long is accommodating or coddling religious beliefs from ridicule or criticism. We are told we must 'respect" the beliefs of others. Sorry, but I do not respect the idiotic belief that a book has magical powers.
“Forcible expulsion†might be somewhat impractical. But closing the borders to further Muslim immigration might be a reasonable start, particularly for those who identify as fundamentalist – and they could easily be identified as any who won’t (for example) piss on the Quran. And you might consider that we – i.e., many countries – already have a “means test†for those wishing to immigrate; seems rather clear, with a stark object lesson staring us in the face, that fundamentalist Muslims simply lack the means or willingness to function in Western democracies.Matt Cavanaugh wrote:NB: I've suggested that moslems in western societies, who cannot accept that free speech means others can & will draw pictures of their prophet or otherwise 'blaspheme' * their religion, should move to an islamist theocracy. Steers has advocated forcible expulsion based solely on religion. I am completely opposed to that.
Y’all can just send me my Nobel Peace Prize here care of Lsuoma ....Population exchange of 1923
Main article: Population exchange between Greece and Turkey
Greek refugees from Smyrna, 1922
The League of Nations defined those to be mutually expelled as the "Muslim inhabitants of Greece" to Turkey and moving "the Christian Orthodox inhabitants of Turkey" to Greece. The plan met with fierce opposition in both countries and was condemned vigorously by a large number of countries. Undeterred, Fridtjof Nansen worked with both Greece and Turkey to gain their acceptance of the proposed population exchange. About 1.5 million Christians and half a million Muslims were moved from one side of the international border to the other.
By the time the Exchange was to take effect (1 May 1923), most of the pre-war Orthodox Greek population of Aegean Turkey had already fled. The Exchange therefore only involved the Greeks of central Anatolia (both Greek and Turkish speaking), and the Greeks of Pontus, a total of roughly 189,916.[15] The total number of Muslims involved was 354,647.[16]
Population transfer prevented further attacks on minorities in the respective states while Nansen was awarded a Nobel Prize for Peace. As a result of the transfers, the Muslim minority in Greece and the Greek minority in Turkey were much reduced. Cyprus and the Dodecanese were not included in the Greco-Turkish population transfer of 1923 because they were under direct British and Italian control respectively.
http://blog.pennlive.com/patriotnewsspo ... awsuit.jpgCunt of Personality wrote:Personally, I'd have no problem with Muslamic Mean Time as the international reference, as long as Big Ben still points to Mecca five times a day.
Aw, don't ruin it!Brive1987 wrote:
These would need some Avicennaing but the sentiment is appropriate:Kirbmarc wrote:I need new material, but all the other posts from Peezus about Islam are either shorter than Ophelia Benson's original content or about Muslim creationism.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010 ... ked-again/I think it’s only appropriate that Vilks’ sketch of Mohammed as a mangy cur should receive wider circulation because of the vileness of their response.
In an undoubtably futile attempt to forestall what I expect will be common objections to this story here, I know that there are political ramifications to the cartoons of Mohammed. I know that many of them were motivated by racism and xenophobia. In this instance, though, I don’t care. Vilks drew a sketch. His enemies set his house on fire.
I sense a mashup. Wish I were smart enough to write one.Aneris wrote:Have you used these? Make sure you don't use some twice. ;)
[misquote]http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011 ... f-him-not/
Son, we live in a world where some Muslims will kill random people if someone insults their magic, holy book. [/misquote]
You might "strike while the iron is hot" - so to speak. And archive as you do so. PZ has a known tendency to delete comments of any who are known to be SlymePitters.Kirbmarc wrote:Thanks to everyone who's been hunting for links. It's been a lot of fun so far. I can't wait for PZ to find out what happened.
I've decided against posting the "hand grenade" until the very end of this game. I'll post it unedited, so even the Pharyngula regulars will figure out what happened. PZ's casual "racism" about fleas and camels to represent muslims will be the cherry on top of his "Islamophobic" comments.
Icing on the cake? Nerd of Redhead stomping in there to do a *FLOOSH* your fuckwittery is dismissed on K.SallyStrange
9 January 2015 at 4:42 pm
Killing is so much more dramatic when done with guns and bombs; Christian terrorists these days get elected to state and national legislatures and kill people with laws.
I really fucking hate this “which religion is worse†conversation. It’s bloody pointless and it’s obvious that racism is the main animus behind all the anti-Islam sentiment. Looking at the various religions without that racial animus yields helpful, nuanced observations. With the racial animus, you get this simplistic insistence that Islam is the worst of the worst, somehow uniquely prone to violence and full of savage, bloodthirsty, cowardly, misogynist believers. The end result of all of THAT is things like the incident a few weeks ago in Michigan where a Muslim teenager became a double amputee because some bigot decided that he wanted to run down Muslims with his car, or the 2012 shooting at a Wisconsin Sikh temple that left 6 people, including the shooter, dead, or the multiple attacks on mosques and visibly Muslim people currently proliferating in France
I hope you gave him a funny fake e-mail address for when he wants to post it.Steersman wrote:You might "strike while the iron is hot" - so to speak. And archive as you do so. PZ has a known tendency to delete comments of any who are known to be SlymePitters.Kirbmarc wrote:Thanks to everyone who's been hunting for links. It's been a lot of fun so far. I can't wait for PZ to find out what happened.
I've decided against posting the "hand grenade" until the very end of this game. I'll post it unedited, so even the Pharyngula regulars will figure out what happened. PZ's casual "racism" about fleas and camels to represent muslims will be the cherry on top of his "Islamophobic" comments.
Oh really at this point it's icing on icing. :lol: :lol:screwtape wrote:Brive, you are an impatient bastard. Let 'em stew a bit longer.
Oh really at this point it's icing on icing. :lol: :lol:screwtape wrote:Brive, you are an impatient bastard. Let 'em stew a bit longer.
Yeah, you're right. Time to end the game. CHECKMATE PZ.You might "strike while the iron is hot" - so to speak. And archive as you do so. PZ has a known tendency to delete comments of any who are known to be SlymePitters.
I used a throwaway email.I hope you gave him a funny fake e-mail address for when he wants to post it.
I've just posted it, thank you!Dick Strawkins wrote:Try this first
"In Iraq, women who violate “Islamic teachings†are tortured and murdered. The “Islamic teachings†that are so important that violators must be tortured and beheaded involve wearing a headscarf."
"the uniform application of secular law is what a civilized society demands, not a patchwork of piecemeal laws which apply differently to different people, and especially not the corrupting insanity of irrational, hateful, vile nonsense like Islam."
from
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008 ... -misogyny/
Fucking amazing :clap:Kirbmarc wrote:I've just posted it, thank you!Dick Strawkins wrote:Try this first
"In Iraq, women who violate “Islamic teachings†are tortured and murdered. The “Islamic teachings†that are so important that violators must be tortured and beheaded involve wearing a headscarf."
"the uniform application of secular law is what a civilized society demands, not a patchwork of piecemeal laws which apply differently to different people, and especially not the corrupting insanity of irrational, hateful, vile nonsense like Islam."
from
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008 ... -misogyny/
Time to end the game then. Should I write the last post and archive the thread?screwtape wrote:The last four posts don't reference you—I think Brive's tweet has come to light and they are pretending you're not there.
It's like Peez has become their beloved but highly embarrasing uncle. 'Shhh. If you ignore him, he'll stop.' :lol:screwtape wrote:The last four posts don't reference you—I think Brive's tweet has come to light and they are pretending you're not there.
YES! This fucking suspense is killing me!Kirbmarc wrote:Time to end the game then. Should I write the last post and archive the thread?screwtape wrote:The last four posts don't reference you—I think Brive's tweet has come to light and they are pretending you're not there.
yeah.Kirbmarc wrote:Time to end the game then. Should I write the last post and archive the thread?screwtape wrote:The last four posts don't reference you—I think Brive's tweet has come to light and they are pretending you're not there.
Fuck! I'm probably the one who screwed it up most egregiously. FUCKFUCKFUCKTony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
Yes, it should all be done in secret and archived to be revealed afterwards.Tony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
Well, we've all learned. Next time will be even better.piero wrote:Fuck! I'm probably the one who screwed it up most egregiously. FUCKFUCKFUCKTony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
I am infested with the fleas of a thousand camels . . . I have publicly engaged with Muslim creationists . . . now I’m on their radar, and my inbox has a new, exotic stench to it.Really? wrote:Easy peasy. Just pop in the ellipsis. It will look like emotion or just Internet talk, but it will do its normal job: abbreviating a quotation.Kirbmarc wrote:I have a hand grenade. A post by PZ Myers which contains a joke that the SJWs could find racist:
I'm thinking about posting it but I want to make it less recognizable. If I'll post it, I'm going to change "this trip to Ireland and the UK" with "commenting on the Internet about atheism" and "Morris, Minnesota" with "where I live" to make it a little harder for the Pharyngulites to figure out where the quote comes from.I am infested with the fleas of a thousand camels. One unfortunate side-effect of this trip to Ireland and the UK is that I have publicly engaged with Muslim creationists — there’s a bit of a dearth of them in Morris, Minnesota, and the few Muslims I have met there are there for the university, and are educated and intelligent — but now I’m on their radar, and my inbox has a new, exotic stench to it.
Should I post the altered comment? It preserves the spirit of Myers' post, but I'm a little wary about changing a single word of his posts, because it could be said that I'm maliciously misquoting Myers (which isn't my intent).
What do you think?
Yeah, it's right. Some of them fell for it, but not as many as I'd have hoped. And think about how deliciously ironic it would have been for Myers to ban himself or a collection of the greatest hits of his own top posters.Tony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
You got Queer Shoop, who may be the dumbest person on the planet, so I'm happy.Kirbmarc wrote:Game over!
Yeah, it's right. Some of them fell for it, but not as many as I'd have hoped. And think about how deliciously ironic it would have been for Myers to ban himself or a collection of the greatest hits of his own top posters.Tony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
Not yet, as far as I know.JackSkeptic wrote:Has Myers banned himself yet?
He posted a full name earlier on in a few posts. I don't know if it was her real name or not but it's been changed now.John Greg wrote:It's not all that important, but on that comment thread where whosits is doing such a wonderfully perfect job of surreptitiously quoting PeeZus, they are also going apeshit over John Nyzell for supposedly doxxing Marilove, because he refers to her in the thread as Marilove, but Marilove is posting in the thread as Marilove. Anyone understand that? At all? I sure don't.
:doh:
Ya think?Really? wrote:You got Queer Shoop, who may be the dumbest person on the planet, so I'm happy.Kirbmarc wrote:Game over!
Yeah, it's right. Some of them fell for it, but not as many as I'd have hoped. And think about how deliciously ironic it would have been for Myers to ban himself or a collection of the greatest hits of his own top posters.Tony Parsehole wrote:They read here too much for this to be kept secret too long.
Next time somebody does this don't let on until all the posts are out there (or tell people via PM and get the to spread the word secretly), then just sit back and bask in the replies.
She wrote this after the pin was pulled, btw. Thus the 'not thinking' bit she put in there is most welcome.SallyStrange
9 January 2015 at 5:26 pm
Firsttimereader and kolnnauzer are flailing and reaching, not thinking. As evidenced by the difficulty they have in avoiding hypocrisy and self-contradiction.