Brive1987 wrote:There is a mild doxxing scandal over at the John Nyzell FtB thread. He's named Marilove. I don't know whether it counts as a dox, given Marilove guest posted on Skepchick linking the names and does so on FB as well.
Giliell has fired off a mod alert and no-one else has batted an eyelid so probable storm in a teacup.
But it was a weird escalation of sorts.
Seriously. This is great. So that John Nyzell thread is all about how the journalists weren't angels and how doxing is bad m'kay.
Here's PZ's latest thread, another in his series about his argument with the guy who is angry PZ incited the destruction of student work.
About the goat: it's complicated. The goat can't give consent to fuck, so it's unethical do to it anyway. On the other hand, the cows also don't give consent to be turned into delicious meals or to have their tits fiddled with for milk, yet a world without meat or milk derivatives is a world I don't want to live in. On the third hand, you can always live up without sex, but you won't last without nutrition, so there's that.
Conclusion: fuck the goat fucker. The problem is, should we fuck him with a goat?
Caitiecat wrote:It’s bizarre, honestly. How do ordinarily rational people get so unhinged with fear over a thing which kills absurdly small numbers of people, simply because the attackers claimed a particular religion?
Southern wrote:About the goat: it's complicated. The goat can't give consent to fuck, so it's unethical do to it anyway. On the other hand, the cows also don't give consent to be turned into delicious meals or to have their tits fiddled with for milk, yet a world without meat or milk derivatives is a world I don't want to live in. On the third hand, you can always live up without sex, but you won't last without nutrition, so there's that.
Conclusion: fuck the goat fucker. The problem is, should we fuck him with a goat?
TiBo wrote:Damn.. all those feminists, the fem friendly orgs, and the social juice guzzlers on Twitter have me blocked by now.
That seriously interferes with my ability to troll them. If that trend continues, I might be forced to create another account. Can I get a hug ?
You and me both.
And if you ask me, the tweets I get blocked for, are almost all terribly anodyne.
subbie1957 wrote:Did anybody notice that when Avicenna plagiarised an article from the Guardian, two of the very few words he did not copy were 'Michael Nugent'?
I guess his magic laptop scanned for the names of people who were enemies of the state and airbrushed them from history.
Southern wrote:About the goat: it's complicated. The goat can't give consent to fuck, so it's unethical do to it anyway. On the other hand, the cows also don't give consent to be turned into delicious meals or to have their tits fiddled with for milk, yet a world without meat or milk derivatives is a world I don't want to live in. On the third hand, you can always live up without sex, but you won't last without nutrition, so there's that.
Conclusion: fuck the goat fucker. The problem is, should we fuck him with a goat?
I think the government should bring in legislation to make sure no animal bottoms are unduly chafed. A standardised penile girth : orifice diameter ratio would be ideal. They could even make a website with a handy calculator. That way everybody's happy.
Southern wrote:About the goat: it's complicated. The goat can't give consent to fuck, so it's unethical do to it anyway. On the other hand, the cows also don't give consent to be turned into delicious meals or to have their tits fiddled with for milk, yet a world without meat or milk derivatives is a world I don't want to live in. On the third hand, you can always live up without sex, but you won't last without nutrition, so there's that.
Conclusion: fuck the goat fucker. The problem is, should we fuck him with a goat?
It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
Don't you know, they're all victims of the white cis-hetero male Patriarchytm
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I brought a carton of cigarettes, a couple Box o' Joes from Dunkin and a stack of these. We'll figure it out.
If you're on this guys side, you need to re-think:
The president of the Catholic League said the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo “provoked†Wednesday’s deadly attack with its mocking cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
In a statement titled, “Muslims Are Right to Be Angry,†Bill Donohue condemned the killings, but also said Charlie Hebdo’s “intolerance†of religious figures is what prompted the attack. Twelve people were killed after masked gunmen stormed the publication’s offices in Paris.
“Killing in response to insult, no matter how gross, must be unequivocally condemned. That is why what happened in Paris cannot be tolerated,†the statement opened. “But neither should we tolerate the kind of intolerance that provoked this violent reaction.â€
“Those who work at this newspaper have a long and disgusting record of going way beyond the mere lampooning of public figures, and this is especially true of their depictions of religious figures,†Donohue said. “For example, they have shown nuns masturbating and popes wearing condoms. They have also shown Muhammad in pornographic poses.â€
The Catholic League founder said Muslims have opposed the “vulgar manner†in which the Prophet Muhammad had been depicted, going on to accuse newspaper publisher Stephane Charbonnier, who was killed Wednesday, of playing a role in his own death.
“It is too bad that he didn’t understand the role he played in his tragic death. In 2012, when asked why he insults Muslims, he said, ‘Muhammad isn’t sacred to me,’†Donohue said. “Had he not been so narcissistic, he may still be alive. Muhammad isn’t sacred to me, either, but it would never occur to me to deliberately insult Muslims by trashing him.â€
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
Don't you know, they're all victims of the white cis-hetero male Patriarchytm
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
No doubt the real blame will be laid at the Slymepit's door.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
No doubt the real blame will be laid at the Slymepit's door.
Unless Avi (scary secret muslim? :shock: ) is one of the jihadists, I think we're in the clear on this one.
Tribble wrote:If you're on this guys side, you need to re-think:
The president of the Catholic League said the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo “provoked†Wednesday’s deadly attack with its mocking cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
In a statement titled, “Muslims Are Right to Be Angry,†Bill Donohue condemned the killings, but also said Charlie Hebdo’s “intolerance†of religious figures is what prompted the attack. Twelve people were killed after masked gunmen stormed the publication’s offices in Paris.
“Killing in response to insult, no matter how gross, must be unequivocally condemned. That is why what happened in Paris cannot be tolerated,†the statement opened. “But neither should we tolerate the kind of intolerance that provoked this violent reaction.â€
“Those who work at this newspaper have a long and disgusting record of going way beyond the mere lampooning of public figures, and this is especially true of their depictions of religious figures,†Donohue said. “For example, they have shown nuns masturbating and popes wearing condoms. They have also shown Muhammad in pornographic poses.â€
The Catholic League founder said Muslims have opposed the “vulgar manner†in which the Prophet Muhammad had been depicted, going on to accuse newspaper publisher Stephane Charbonnier, who was killed Wednesday, of playing a role in his own death.
“It is too bad that he didn’t understand the role he played in his tragic death. In 2012, when asked why he insults Muslims, he said, ‘Muhammad isn’t sacred to me,’†Donohue said. “Had he not been so narcissistic, he may still be alive. Muhammad isn’t sacred to me, either, but it would never occur to me to deliberately insult Muslims by trashing him.â€
Creates VAWA only to find young "liberal" women turning against him and calling him creepy and coming this close -> <- to calling him lecherous and a sexual harasser
a) sort of liking Biden back when his plagiarism was uncovered and
b) not quite understanding the big deal
But I do want to encourage this calling out of Biden as lecherous and creepy, if only to hear how the parent of VAWA and champion of the 1 in 5 statistic and yes means yes explains his own behavior. My guess is the whole Dear Colleague DOE letter preponderance of evidence nonsense gets ton of support from the Veep's office if it wasn't birthed there.
So I don't mind seeing Biden get what's coming to him, the inevitable feminist turn.
But I think it's outrageous to call out his behavior as lecherous and not to note how an older man or woman kissing a kid happens millions of times a day with the kids almost always trying to duck it. As to creepy? His behavior is no creepier than any of the other kisses of that sort. But it's not newsworthy either unless you are kicking off a campaign to put posters on buses and complain of elderkissing.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I brought a carton of cigarettes, a couple Box o' Joes from Dunkin and a stack of these. We'll figure it out.
So, looking at that, killing all those Jews in the Holocaust was okie-dokie seeing as how privileged they all were and it just a 'case of punching up' by the German people.
+25 Jewish
+10 Affluent (all those professionals & bankers)
+25 Able-bodied (all those Jewish doctors keeping them healthy)
+20 European (some from the +25s, some from the +15s, on average +5 over the Germans)
+25 White (they are white)
+10 Attractive (most Jews I've personally known are reasonably attractive with plenty of 9/10's on the scale).
+20 Most are straight.
+20 Most are CIS
Yep. A clear case of punching up. And if a few 'oppressed' got in there, well, you can't make an omlet without breaking a few eggs, amirite?
Dick Strawkins wrote:Unless Avi (scary secret muslim? :shock: ) is one of the jihadists, I think we're in the clear on this one.
What if Avi is called in to do the autopsy on the female cop and then his Slymepit-exposed incompetence is used to undermine the subsequent court case? [with apologies for putting the question mark at the end? of course]
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I'll point out that the wording above implies to many if not most English-speakers/-readers that the "black jihadist" is not female and the "female jihadist" is not black.
Which might seem like a petty point - another of my pet peeves.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I brought a carton of cigarettes, a couple Box o' Joes from Dunkin and a stack of these. We'll figure it out.
So, looking at that, killing all those Jews in the Holocaust was okie-dokie seeing as how privileged they all were and it just a 'case of punching up' by the German people.
+25 Jewish
+10 Affluent (all those professionals & bankers)
+25 Able-bodied (all those Jewish doctors keeping them healthy)
+20 European (some from the +25s, some from the +15s, on average +5 over the Germans)
+25 White (they are white)
+10 Attractive (most Jews I've personally known are reasonably attractive with plenty of 9/10's on the scale).
+20 Most are straight.
+20 Most are CIS
Yep. A clear case of punching up. And if a few 'oppressed' got in there, well, you can't make an omlet without breaking a few eggs, amirite?
Yes, although I am pretty sure consensus is that infographic is a troll.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I'll point out that the wording above implies to many if not most English-speakers/-readers that the "black jihadist" is not female and the "female jihadist" is not black.
Which might seem like a petty point - another of my pet peeves.
I'm just playing the social justice game - shove everyone into a pigeon hole, label it, and to hell with everything else. I'm glad it was ambiguous and confusing.
JacquesCuze wrote:
Yes, although I am pretty sure consensus is that infographic is a troll.
I'm sure of it. But then I think pretty much all SJWism is a troll, regardless of the sincerity. And with what's coming out France and the complete and utter horse shit both extremes of the social-alignment liberal/conservative dichotomy are spewing to exploit their fuck-wittary, I think I could use some gallows humor.
The fact that there's a black jihadist and a female jihadist is unimportant to me. The important factor is not their colour or gender, but their actions driven by insane ideology - something that social justice warriors are seemingly compelled to ignore. This was the point of my post.
JacquesCuze wrote:
Yes, although I am pretty sure consensus is that infographic is a troll.
I'm sure of it. But then I think pretty much all SJWism is a troll, regardless of the sincerity. And with what's coming out France and the complete and utter horse shit both extremes of the social-alignment liberal/conservative dichotomy are spewing to exploit their fuck-wittary, I think I could use some gallows humor.
The bright side of the hostage standoff in France at the Kosher supermarket is that it will make it more obvious to many how the Jews are responsible.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
According to Lord Peezus, if you remember, the police isn't to be trusted. A police officer being shot is a good thing. She would probably beat and murder those poor black people cornered by white men (that aren't Peezus or one of his very few friends).
JacquesCuze wrote:
Yes, although I am pretty sure consensus is that infographic is a troll.
I'm sure of it. But then I think pretty much all SJWism is a troll, regardless of the sincerity. And with what's coming out France and the complete and utter horse shit both extremes of the social-alignment liberal/conservative dichotomy are spewing to exploit their fuck-wittary, I think I could use some gallows humor.
The bright side of the hostage standoff in France at the Kosher supermarket is that it will make it more obvious to many how the Jews are responsible.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
According to Lord Peezus, if you remember, the police isn't to be trusted. A police officer being shot is a good thing. She would probably beat and murder those poor black people cornered by white men (that aren't Peezus or one of his very few friends).
Ooh ooh! I know what else he'd say! He'd point out that she would eventually murder poor black people because of internalized racism.
So, the Jews are resposible for... pornography? All hail Israel!
I'm not saying the Jews are responsible for pornography, but I am here to attest of the demographics of the Western San Fernando Valley circa 1970/80 and it wasn't Swedish.
(Many of our most beloved classic pornos have Jewish stars and directors)
BarnOwl wrote:Giliell appears to have a serious cognitive impairment. Even when the context of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons is explained to her by several commenters, she still can't understand. Or else she's just a duplicitous, doubling-down twat like most of the Pharyngutard commentariat.
Also, for those FtBers who keep insisting that criticism of Islam and Muslims is "racist," I'd like to know what sort of SNPs, haplogroups, Alu elements, etc. are associated with "Muslim." I'm sure PeeZus can help y'all out, since he's so knowledgeable about human molecular genetics and all.
Gilell is the kind of person one only encounters on the internet, because they are too mental to function IRL.
Cunt of Personality wrote:It's a fucking SJW nightmare now. A black jihadist and a female jihadist, responsible for shooting a female police officer in the back have taken hostages in a kosher supermarket. Does the "progressive stack" already describe who to root for in this complex scenario? "No female police officer deserves to get shot in the back, but...[insert quote from FTB]"
I'll point out that the wording above implies to many if not most English-speakers/-readers that the "black jihadist" is not female and the "female jihadist" is not black.
Which might seem like a petty point - another of my pet peeves.
Well, at least I didn't make a crap pun about "incestors".
My father's family has lived in this area since it was first settled by the evil white man. Because of that at one point before NASA came in, we were related to just about everyone.
My great grandfather had the entire family tree(at least in the US) in his head. People would come to him to make sure the person their were dating was not too close a relative.
I have relatives in that part of the country. Lot Campbell's settled in Tennessee and Alabama. They're all 3rd, 4th and further-out cousins, none of whom I don't know beyond the odd few that honor their Scottish Ancestry and are at the Campbell table in various annual 'Scottish Gmaes" gatherings, so it's not like we're all that close. But they're there. And some of them were famous in their day. For example, the very distant ancestral William Campbell a former Governor of Tennessee and for whom Fort Campbell is named.
But like every other famous relative who has accomplished something, it means nothing in my life as I sure as fuck didn't get any 'privilege' out of it. Though I did get a boat-load of unreasonable expectations dropped on my shoulders as a kid.
JacquesCuze wrote:
Yes, although I am pretty sure consensus is that infographic is a troll.
I'm sure of it. But then I think pretty much all SJWism is a troll, regardless of the sincerity. And with what's coming out France and the complete and utter horse shit both extremes of the social-alignment liberal/conservative dichotomy are spewing to exploit their fuck-wittary, I think I could use some gallows humor.
The bright side of the hostage standoff in France at the Kosher supermarket is that it will make it more obvious to many how the Jews are responsible.
+1. Exactly. They probably hired them as part of a Zionist conspiracy to blacken the reputations of Muslims. I bet Git is in on it... ;)
In the past I usually didn't become angry. Like, really angry. I'm generally very calm most of the time. However lately I've found myself fuming, and I mean really out the ears I'm-going-to-shin-somebody fuming, and I don't really know why. I suppose most of it comes from expecting to be reasonable but instead they are completely fucking mental, and most of the time you have no way of getting through to them. It frustrates me to no end. It didn't use to, and I tend to keep it together anyway, but fuck, man. Jesus. Events these past few years have almost sent me over the edge more than a few times.
This latest thing with Charlie Hebdo. I am done defending Muslims. I mean, I am still for the most part going to insist that these are extremists and doesn't represent the ideas and ethics and morals of all Muslims, because how could I? That would be hypocritical. I also know quite a few Muslims in my neighbourhood who besides their religion are just like any other person. One might even say quintessentially Swedish with the way they behave, what they eat (stuff like caviar in a tube which is a thing), how they behave, their thought process, their tolerance to different ideas, and so on and so forth. The only difference being that they pray to what they perceive to be a "god" every day and I don't. But here's the point. I don't care. Not anymore. If you sleuth my comments on YouTube from two to three years ago, you would find me almost defending the antics of Muslims based on what is said in the Koran (Quran, whatever) and in the hadiths as opposed to what they actually do, but these past few years have taught me that it doesn't matter. If your first thought, or second thought, learning of these attacks on that diner in the US, Charlie Hebdo and now a deli held up seemingly by the same people is to find an excuse for them, that this isn't what Islam teaches, that they aren't real Muslims, you've lost the plot.
Black people are being murdered by racist cops who get away with it.
[derail]And now cops want cop killing to be a hate crime. As if the justice system doesn’t already come down as hard as possible on cop killers, often with the death penalty. Even when they raid the wrong fucking house and the killing was probably totally justifiable self-defense.[/derail]
I wonder how xie feels about "hate crime" and "hate speech" designations.
Pitchguest wrote:In the past I usually didn't become angry. Like, really angry. I'm generally very calm most of the time. However lately I've found myself fuming, and I mean really out the ears I'm-going-to-shin-somebody fuming, and I don't really know why. I suppose most of it comes from expecting to be reasonable but instead they are completely fucking mental, and most of the time you have no way of getting through to them. It frustrates me to no end. It didn't use to, and I tend to keep it together anyway, but fuck, man. Jesus. Events these past few years have almost sent me over the edge more than a few times.
This latest thing with Charlie Hebdo. I am done defending Muslims. I mean, I am still for the most part going to insist that these are extremists and doesn't represent the ideas and ethics and morals of all Muslims, because how could I? That would be hypocritical. I also know quite a few Muslims in my neighbourhood who besides their religion are just like any other person. One might even say quintessentially Swedish with the way they behave, what they eat (stuff like caviar in a tube which is a thing), how they behave, their thought process, their tolerance to different ideas, and so on and so forth. The only difference being that they pray to what they perceive to be a "god" every day and I don't. But here's the point. I don't care. Not anymore. If you sleuth my comments on YouTube from two to three years ago, you would find me almost defending the antics of Muslims based on what is said in the Koran (Quran, whatever) and in the hadiths as opposed to what they actually do, but these past few years have taught me that it doesn't matter. If your first thought, or second thought, learning of these attacks on that diner in the US, Charlie Hebdo and now a deli held up seemingly by the same people is to find an excuse for them, that this isn't what Islam teaches, that they aren't real Muslims, you've lost the plot.
AnonymousCowherd wrote:
I've heard that Icelanders are such small population that someone has put out an app for phones so that, if you meet someone in the bar you just "bonk" the phones to see if they are too closely related for any other kind of bonking. That said, the way Icelanders drink, you wonder if the app (like the superego) is completely soluble in alcohol.
Now, who else can I offend?
Icelanders are inbred? Huh, that explains Of Monsters And Men.
