Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
All hail the Midnight Marauder!Southern wrote:Midnight Marauder will have a fielddaynight on Pharyngula.
Could be - that has occurred to me, and you have my sympathy. But there was nothing wrong with Sunder's post, IMO (which was not directed at Horseface anyway), and both Aneris and Cunt can *floosh* it.TiBo wrote:It probably worked out for you so well because you were so young. I was older when my grandparents died (whom I grew up with as a child), and the damage to my entire personality was immense.Apples wrote:No, he's wrong. My mom died when I was 14. You'll get over it. If that's your worst fear, I hope you're never alone in an elevator with Karen Stollznow.Aneris wrote:He might be a total cunt, but he is right. The death of my parents is my worst fear. When I read of Jen's case today, I felt only sympathy.
Sulman wrote:Well, this just all went a bit scary.
Does anyone think it will matter, though? The anti-Radford league have never really cared for evidence.
I reckon that's the reason once a lawsuit was filed they began screaming, "Oh, of course! He'll shut her up by ruining her financially!" Once it becomes a reality, they're less than irrelevant. Hopefully they'll all think twice about throwing around accusations without ACTUAL evidence.Sulman wrote:Well, this just all went a bit scary.
Does anyone think it will matter, though? The anti-Radford league have never really cared for evidence.
Theoretically, the only good thing about making Big Honking Relationship Mistakes is that it helps to fine-tune your relationship picker so you don't make the same errors again. Requires figuring out where you went wrong though (vs how wrong the other person is {also important}), which some people go to ridiculous lengths to avoid.Tapir wrote:Baxter....Totes marriage material, Baxter.My relationship with Karen has been a rocky one. She is the most enchanting,
wonderful, spiteful, insecure, grudge-harboring woman I have ever met. The thing
that worries me is the signs that she is either a huge liar or delusional
:roll:
Please someone copy pasta, or take a picture of, his/her contributions if they happen :DGumby wrote:All hail the Midnight Marauder!Southern wrote:Midnight Marauder will have a fielddaynight on Pharyngula.
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd24 ... d960e5.gif
Isn't it kinda sad how quick the favorite arguments against the creationists is forgotten by the so-called skeptics over at FTB?Skep tickle wrote:Jumping ahead to ask people here, based on a twitter conversation just now:
What would it take for you to believe a claim of sexual harassment or assault?
I'm in the same fucking boat. Baxter is the one who didn't get away. Karen seems - er... stabby.ERV wrote:I really really really, really, hope nothing happens to Baxter. I am genuinely concerned about this mans physical safety after this has been made public, and I really hope he has somewhere safe to stay. I've got a very bad feeling about this.
It looks like you see it coming too. Any bets she will wait till he is asleep first?ERV wrote:I really really really, really, hope nothing happens to Baxter. I am genuinely concerned about this mans physical safety after this has been made public, and I really hope he has somewhere safe to stay. I've got a very bad feeling about this.
Doubt it, she'd have to set up a self defense situation.AndrewV69 wrote:It looks like you see it coming too. Any bets she will wait till he is asleep first?ERV wrote:I really really really, really, hope nothing happens to Baxter. I am genuinely concerned about this mans physical safety after this has been made public, and I really hope he has somewhere safe to stay. I've got a very bad feeling about this.
Not going to happen... but it will still be spectacular watching the whole FTB blow up as they all fall over themselves trying to explain just why everything Radford says is wrong and incorrect and how he is still the incarnation of evil.feralandproud wrote:I reckon that's the reason once a lawsuit was filed they began screaming, "Oh, of course! He'll shut her up by ruining her financially!" Once it becomes a reality, they're less than irrelevant. Hopefully they'll all think twice about throwing around accusations without ACTUAL evidence.Sulman wrote:Well, this just all went a bit scary.
Does anyone think it will matter, though? The anti-Radford league have never really cared for evidence.
Never stick your dick in crazy...Apples wrote:Peezus fucking christ - I don't care how this affects Radford's case - this is as juicy as it gets (trigger warning: raep - I mean Reap)
http://benrlegal.info/wp-content/upload ... -mail2.pdf
I don't know what point he's trying to get across. The topic seems to be an excuse to bitch about MRAs some more. Someone quotes a feminist "if you're not a feminist, you're a bigot" and they argue that's a strawman because no feminist believes that.TiBo wrote:I always knew there was something shady about Avicenna ...
From his newest post @ http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... -feminist/
Is he saying that boy toddlers are oppressors who deserve to be raped with scalpels ? Is he insane ?A lot of feminists are anti-circumcision. Both Female and Male. Now Female genital mutilation is on many scales worse than the male equivalent, but we often see MRA derail conversations about FGM with conversations about men.9. You find the idea of genital mutilation of a man being joked about on live television hysterically funny but claim misandry doesn’t exist.
Humour punches up. Male circumcision and getting kicked in the crotch is funny for the same reason falling down the stairs is funny. It is because it is someone in power getting hurt by an attack on one of the things that gives him power. While hitting a woman is not funny since women are routinely hit by men and it’s a major problem.
(backup @ http://www.freezepage.com/1396481462LHKGIXISEV )
No! Hold it in! We like you better constipated.cunt wrote:Haah. Oh hang on a minute. I'll have to put on my "I CARE" studded jacket just before I take this massive shit.
You think that would be basic self preservation, but literal dickheads can't help it, they delude themselves into thinking they'll never be the ones on the bad end of that crazy, instead they'll be the ones on the good end of all the crazy sex.Lsuoma wrote:Never stick your dick in crazy...Apples wrote:Peezus fucking christ - I don't care how this affects Radford's case - this is as juicy as it gets (trigger warning: raep - I mean Reap)
http://benrlegal.info/wp-content/upload ... -mail2.pdf
Here's hoping that this is the extent of it:ERV wrote:I really really really, really, hope nothing happens to Baxter. I am genuinely concerned about this mans physical safety after this has been made public, and I really hope he has somewhere safe to stay. I've got a very bad feeling about this.
Whatever happens, there are a couple of people that need to take a bloody hard look at themselves.acathode wrote:Not going to happen... but it will still be spectacular watching the whole FTB blow up as they all fall over themselves trying to explain just why everything Radford says is wrong and incorrect and how he is still the incarnation of evil.feralandproud wrote:I reckon that's the reason once a lawsuit was filed they began screaming, "Oh, of course! He'll shut her up by ruining her financially!" Once it becomes a reality, they're less than irrelevant. Hopefully they'll all think twice about throwing around accusations without ACTUAL evidence.Sulman wrote:Well, this just all went a bit scary.
Does anyone think it will matter, though? The anti-Radford league have never really cared for evidence.
Ah yes. Owned.Spike13 wrote:No! Hold it in! We like you better constipated.cunt wrote:Haah. Oh hang on a minute. I'll have to put on my "I CARE" studded jacket just before I take this massive shit.
Never stick your dick in BPD.Apples wrote:Peezus fucking christ - I don't care how this affects Radford's case - this is as juicy as it gets (trigger warning: raep - I mean Reap)
http://benrlegal.info/wp-content/upload ... -mail2.pdf
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/linux- ... -wget/883/Downloading an Entire Web Site with wget
Sep 05, 2008 By Dashamir Hoxha
If you ever need to download an entire Web site, perhaps for off-line viewing, wget can do the
job—for example:
Code: Select all
$ wget \ --recursive \ --no-clobber \ --page-requisites \ --html-extension \ --convert-links \ --restrict-file-names=windows \ --domains website.org \ --no-parent \ http://benrlegal.info/
The quickest and easiest way to mirror a remote Web site is to use wget. Wget is similar to cURL (and I'll be the first to admit that I prefer cURL over wget), but wget has some really slick and useful features that aren't found in cURL, such as a means to download an entire Web site for local viewing:
This command does a number of things. The -rkp option tells wget to download recursively, to convert downloaded links in HTML pages to point to local files, and to obtain all images and other files to properly render the page.Code: Select all
$ wget -rkp -l6 -np -nH -N http://benrlegal.info/
The -l6 option tells wget to recurse to a maximum of six nested levels, while -np tells it not to recurse to the parent directory. The -nH option tells wget not to create host directories; this means that the files will be downloaded to the current directory rather than a directory named after the hostname of the site being mirrored.
Finally, -N tells wget to use time-stamping, which is its way of trying to prevent downloading the same unchanged file more than once. Unfortunately, with dynamic sites being the norm, this may not work very well, but it's worth adding, regardless.
The refined version:Apples wrote::clap: :clap: :clap:Mykeru wrote: "I haz thouzandz of ur dollers"
Wellll.... Just don't marry it...and give it a fake name....and your digits are the crack hotline...Lsuoma wrote:Never stick your dick in crazy...Apples wrote:Peezus fucking christ - I don't care how this affects Radford's case - this is as juicy as it gets (trigger warning: raep - I mean Reap)
http://benrlegal.info/wp-content/upload ... -mail2.pdf
I imagine it's gonna be a long night for PeezusPZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 8:06 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Notice please that I have not linked to Radford’s disgusting violation of privacy, and I will not tolerate anyone else linking to it here, either.
A retreat smothered in righteous indignation is still a retreat.CommanderTuvok wrote:PZ has now posted on it.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
From personal experience, you might be amazed how many people will overlook something until afterwards. I almost got caught, but narrowly missed out on the crazy. friends didn't, and their experiences made me glad it never happened. Sometimes the "crazy" part seems more "wild and attractive" rather than "bunny pot".Spike13 wrote:Wellll.... Just don't marry it...and give it a fake name....and your digits are the crack hotline...Lsuoma wrote:Never stick your dick in crazy...Apples wrote:Peezus fucking christ - I don't care how this affects Radford's case - this is as juicy as it gets (trigger warning: raep - I mean Reap)
http://benrlegal.info/wp-content/upload ... -mail2.pdf
Oh yes and condoms lots 'o' condoms
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/Ben Radford has taken the next step in sleaze, dumping all of his and Karen Stollznow’s mutual correspondence to the web, along with various other documents to demonstrate that yes, they once had a relationship, that Stollznow has had some turbulent relationships with others, etc., etc., etc. None of it really matters — does he think that somehow having once had a relationship, it means he can never ever be guilty of harassment ever again?
But I just want to mention one piece of ‘evidence’ he has released to the world. It’s a selfie he took of himself, shirtless, in bed with a woman. Radford has a smug smirk on his face; the woman is covering her face with her hand, clearly not wanting any part of this exhibition. Radford has commissioned an expert in photographic analysis to compare her hand to Stollznow’s hand in other photos, to ‘prove’ that it is her. Note what he has done: he has taken a picture of a woman in an intimate situation, clearly against her wishes, and has now posted it to the web, with evidence to identify her.
And he thinks this vindicates him.
My god. What a revolting narcissistic scumbag.
No, that would be the dude in the gimp mask.cunt wrote:Ah yes. Owned.Spike13 wrote:
No! Hold it in! We like you better constipated.
Black hole calling the kettle a big meanie.feralandproud wrote:http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/
I imagine it's gonna be a long night for PeezusPZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 8:06 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Notice please that I have not linked to Radford’s disgusting violation of privacy, and I will not tolerate anyone else linking to it here, either.
Perhaps I'm misreading it, but I parse the ungrammatical original as "a point of view that Colbert takes himself to be speaking for, [namely the one of] liberals, racial minorities, [and] the underprivileged."Kenteken wrote:I read "a point of view" not "the point of view".Guestus Aurelius wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/opinion/s ... index.html
:roll:
Hope this writer never makes it past "adjunct professor." What a stupid fucking asshole.
Here is a gem:
So Park and her brigade of hypersensitive twits "represent [the] point of view ... [of] liberals, racial minorities, [and] the underprivileged"? Really? Did you poll "liberals, racial minorities, [and] the underprivileged" to see if they overwhelmingly agree with Park? Methinks not, and methinks your generalization is wrong and frankly more racist and offensive by far than Colbert's satire.Many of Colbert's defenders have been asking why Park and her followers should get to decide what Colbert can and cannot say? Who cares what they think?
Colbert should care what they think. Park and her followers represent a point of view that Colbert takes himself to be speaking for, liberals, racial minorities, the underprivileged. As a privileged white male, Colbert (just like the character he plays) gets his license to use what would otherwise be outrageous language because of his associations to those communities themselves.
Interesting that PeeZus says that Radford's lawyer had already sent this stuff to him in order - according the PeeZus - to intimidate him.CommanderTuvok wrote:PZ has now posted on it.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
:lol:Sulman wrote:And really? Lecturing about publishing private correspondence?
Presumably if it came via a florally named intermediary it would be just fine to publish any old thing.
Really, PZ?Ben Radford has taken the next step in sleaze, dumping all of his and Karen Stollznow’s mutual correspondence to the web, along with various other documents to demonstrate that yes, they once had a relationship, that Stollznow has had some turbulent relationships with others, etc., etc., etc. None of it really matters — does he think that somehow having once had a relationship, it means he can never ever be guilty of harassment ever again?
Hence my last post:Tapir wrote:Really, PZ?Ben Radford has taken the next step in sleaze, dumping all of his and Karen Stollznow’s mutual correspondence to the web, along with various other documents to demonstrate that yes, they once had a relationship, that Stollznow has had some turbulent relationships with others, etc., etc., etc. None of it really matters — does he think that somehow having once had a relationship, it means he can never ever be guilty of harassment ever again?
Her (alleged) falsification of e-mail dates don't matter? Her (alleged) history of false allegations against other people don't matter?
:popcorn:
If intentionally evading the point were a science, PZ would be a Nobel winner.
Thanks MykeruMykeru wrote:The refined version:Apples wrote::clap: :clap: :clap:Mykeru wrote: "I haz thouzandz of ur dollers"
Curiously, no mention of Radford publishing Stollznow's arrest for domestic violence.decius wrote:Suddenly, privacy matters.
[youtube]FMnTQEvHb1A[/youtube]feralandproud wrote:http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/
I imagine it's gonna be a long night for PeezusPZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 8:06 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Notice please that I have not linked to Radford’s disgusting violation of privacy, and I will not tolerate anyone else linking to it here, either.
:lol:Sulman wrote:A retreat smothered in righteous indignation is still a retreat.CommanderTuvok wrote:PZ has now posted on it.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -f-christ/
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
He's running.
That's just part of every healthy "turbulent relationship".James Caruthers wrote:Curiously, no mention of Radford publishing Stollznow's arrest for domestic violence.decius wrote:Suddenly, privacy matters.
