Page 5 of 1076
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:34 pm
by dogen
Southern wrote:See you depraved fuckers tomorrow, with some lulz coming from Stollznov side. I hope she gets something good tomorrow, maybe a video of Radford groping her or a bona-fide notarized document thingee from a trusted source. She has to. I need it to see this getting even better, since Shermer x Peezee was such a dud.
Why, where are you going? And, incidentally, why are you never seen in the same room as the Midnight Marauder?
:o
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:35 pm
by rpguest
i am more convinced than ever that they are all in it together, to teach the overall community what it means to be skeptical, while running off with hundreds of thousands of donated yacht-buying dollars to have ravishing, empowering threeway makeouts on the riviera
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:35 pm
by Aneris
Ape+lust wrote:Her Indiegogo is up over $500, plus whatever Dana Hunter contributed, in the past hour. Beliebers gonna beliebe
harder.
[.img]
http://imgur.com/hYdu05L.png[/img]
They have made an emotional and finacial investment. Now various biases kick in, and after an disappointment there is now the classic Cognitive Dissonance effect visible, as Leon Festinger described it with the disappointed Seeker cult. See it like witnessing a solar eclipse.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:36 pm
by Really?
Hey, assholes. Stop using public communication venues to communicate with this person who communicates on public communication venues.
78
Corvus Whiteneck
2 April 2014 at 10:23 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Some pitclown tweeted at me referencing something I posted on FTB. No big deal, one tweet in my notifications, whatever.
But consider, this is who we are dealing with: losers who will google (or other search-engine) a blog-commenter pseudonym, and then tweet at a similar twitter handle(s)… because reasons.
And I don’t even have a name or avatar that is obviously female. Jeebus help me if I did.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:36 pm
by Sunder
Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85
Just read it.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:37 pm
by Sulman
I'd be careful making assumptions about anyone's mental state, let alone diagnosis. They might all be completely nuts (everyone's seen people like that at some point, right) or they might all be a bunch of conniving bastards. There's no way of telling, especially in love triangles.
Likewise all of the evidence outside of the police stuff might be total balls. There's no way of knowing at this point.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:37 pm
by Lsuoma
Sunder wrote:Anyone catch PZ libeling Ben's lawyer?
Ben's lawyer? Please please please!
(Although, it shouldn't be possible in law to libel a lawyer...)
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:38 pm
by Pitchguest
Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Cherry picked, massaged, out-of-context, and irrelevant "evidence" does not a case make...
The guy doesn't know what irony is, apparently.
Also, how is the claim of Stollznow falsifying the dates of emails to make her case more solid irrelevant?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:39 pm
by James Caruthers
Sunder wrote:Anyone catch PZ libeling Ben's lawyer?
He's just establishing the FTB party line in case Stollznow loses or settles in a way that has her apologizing publicly.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:40 pm
by Steersman
Really? wrote:
<snip>
Steersman wrote:dogen wrote:
<snip>
If I ran across Ogvorbis, I would put the car in reverse just to make sure.
Bit of a cheap shot. Assuming, at a very long stretch, that he isn't trolling the hell out of everyone one there, the most charitable interpretation is that he was both victim and victimizer, and that the former may have had some significant contributions to the latter. I wonder how much moral sense we all had at that age - I certainly know that mine was notably deficient - and how traumatic experiences might have diminished that even further.
Point taken, but if you tell us that you raped a couple little girls while knowing it's wrong, I'm not going to offer you pouncetugs and babysitting offers. I'm going to urge you to tell the authorities so the grown victims could receive the attention and closure they need.
True enough. But then the target should be the supposed "enablers" or condoners, rather than the victim/victimizer.
Although I wonder at the efficacy of "telling the authorities"; reminds me of Jason Bourne tracking down the Russian woman whose parents he had killed to apologize - "truth and reconciliation" seems to be more effective than draconian punishment. But maybe that was what you were getting at.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:41 pm
by dogen
Sunder wrote:Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85
Just read it.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:42 pm
by James Caruthers
Sunder wrote:Holy shit, PZ's latest comment. #85
Just read it.
The kettle has long since gone past the point of accusing the pot of being a Person of Color, and is now furiously erecting a cross to burn on Mr. Pot's lawn.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:42 pm
by Mykeru
Really? wrote:Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Shit, dude. If he's talking, try to pry as much info as you can out of him. Honey, not vinegar.
We need to help him get out of this abusive relationship with a woman who clearly has BPD and a history of domestic violence. He's just going to keep defending her because that's what DV victims do...until they get killed by their abusers, of course.
I don't do honey. We need the good cop
Boring conversation anyway
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:43 pm
by Aneris
Keep in mind, when this doesn't go well for Karen, then it surely was Teh Patriarchyâ„¢
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:44 pm
by Sunder
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:44 pm
by JacquesCuze
Use the command below from a windows cygwin shell to get a local copy of radford's website on your disk so that you can browse it locally. That means it converts the original network URLs to local file URLs.
If you would like a mirror of the site that can be rehosted you can try the almost identical command line
If you are on Windows and don't have cygwin installed, you can install cygwin and then ask cygwin to install wget and then use the above commands. Linux and mac users should be able to use the same commands as above, but this was tested on Windows.
If there is interest and someone knows a good site to place it, I can upload a zip file of the site as I have mirrored it.
wget tells me there are 101 files, 32M.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:49 pm
by Mykeru
Aneris wrote:Keep in mind, when this doesn't go well for Karen, then it surely was Teh Patriarchyâ„¢
Seriously, someone get in there and play good cop on Baxter. I couldn't pretend to be nice to the guy if you put my balls in a vise.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:49 pm
by Really?
Yes, this is funny. The sad part is that I'm going to bet that this is PZ jumping the shark. The lulz will diminish in quality from this moment on... =(
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:49 pm
by justinvacula
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:51 pm
by Spike13
Steersman wrote:dogen wrote:Clarence wrote:
<snip>
Well, Stollznow is a 'name' skeptic, whereas , except for the pit, I'd have never heard of Ogvorbis and if I ran across him from reading the occasional linked thread or something I'd have no clue he had ever claimed to have been sexually assaulted or claimed to have raped someone.
If I ran across Ogvorbis, I would put the car in reverse just to make sure.
Bit of a cheap shot. Assuming, at a very long stretch, that he isn't trolling the hell out of everyone one there, the most charitable interpretation is that he was both victim and victimizer, and that the former may have had some significant contributions to the latter. I wonder how much moral sense we all had at that age - I certainly know that mine was notably deficient - and how traumatic experiences might have diminished that even further.
Excellent points steers,
I think that the ogvorbis/rapist meme gets lost in that he admits being victim/ assailant at a young age.
He is accepted and is an honored member of the SJW
The irony is that the posters here(as far as I know) have committed no such act, yet are painted as monsters because they do not go along with the males are always wrong narrative.
Being a victim of childhood rape, if my abusers' had had influence over me, we'll who knows? I would like to think that I would not have carried on the cycle so to speak.
Please, no pity points. If I got bit by a snake, I would not expect pounce hugs. That is what it was. Same as a mugging. I'm well past over it.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:51 pm
by Matt Cavanaugh
Really? wrote:Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
We need to help him get out of this abusive relationship with a woman who clearly has BPD and a history of domestic violence. He's just going to keep defending her because that's what DV victims do...until they get killed by their abusers, of course.
As someone who himself was married to a crazy* person, i can say that you get dragged down into their craziness, and end up constantly defending and shielding their terrible behavior from the outside world without even realizing it.
So Baxter, please:
get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
* As in committed-to-a-mental-hospital crazy.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:54 pm
by deLurch
EdwardGemmer wrote:The Radford/Stollsnow post coitus selfie just begs for a pit Photoshop
What? You mean the 'Good Morning Baxter' shot?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:56 pm
by Gefan
Should Karen soon be forced to defend herself from Baxter via the Jodi Arias method (TM) I put the over-under on incoming "baboon bucks" at a hundred grand.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:57 pm
by Spike13
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:BarnOwl wrote:You know those old saws that your grandparents, great-grandparents, etc. would quote and you'd go :roll: ? Like
A fool and hir money are soon parted? Well ...
Dana Hunter
2 April 2014 at 9:27 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Gave this month’s earnings, and as long as my financial situation doesn’t tank horribly, I intend to continue donating until Radford has been utterly and completely crushed by Karen’s lawyer. I’m sick of this shit. I’m sick of these jackasses. Time to send them a clear and unforgettable message regarding our unwillingness to allow them to continue preying on people without consequence.
I hope Karen’s found the best in the business, someone who savors a tall glass of defeated harasser tears each morning.
Dana Hunter might as well don the black sweats, tie up the white Nike's, and wait for the alien spaceship.
This is how cult members respond.
Nice! A heavens gate reference! I remember reading that some folks responded to that by sating
" makes you wonder if a bunch of bright young people did that they might have known something."
No, no they didn't.
They wasted they previous gift of life they were given.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:57 pm
by Guestus Aurelius
I cannot believe that Baxter is still responding to Mykeru.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:58 pm
by deLurch
Yes, all of the evidence pz said he refused to look at. As he said, he no longer considers himself a skeptic.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:59 pm
by deLurch
JacquesCuze wrote:It certainly doesn't help Stollznow for PZ to tweet all her dox are out.
SSShhhhhh.....
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:02 pm
by JackSkeptic
free thoughtpolice wrote:Dana Hunter
2 April 2014 at 9:27 pm (UTC -5)
Gave this month’s earnings, and as long as my financial situation doesn’t tank horribly, I intend to continue donating until Radford has been utterly and completely crushed by Karen’s lawyer. I’m sick of this shit. I’m sick of these jackasses. Time to send them a clear and unforgettable message regarding our unwillingness to allow them to continue preying on people without consequence.
I hope Karen’s found the best in the business, someone who savors a tall glass of defeated harasser tears each morning.
They really get off on hate don't they. It does not matter who they hurt, including those they claim to support. It does not matter about evidence, just absolute belief with no questions allowed. I hope both parties have sufficient funds to defend themselves. These people's hate is what makes them so poisonous and totally at odds with the 'Justice' they so laughably claim to support.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:02 pm
by JacquesCuze
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg
He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:03 pm
by Old_ones
Hurin wrote:Nerd of Dedhead
Citation need, or you lie and bullshit. Nothing anybody says in defense of BR without evidence is dismissed. Scum is rotting….
Radford posted documentation of his claims which PZ won’t allow linking to. Interesting, that. I’m sure it has nothing at all to do with the fact that PZ picked a side before he had any awareness of what evidence might be out there.
On an unrelated note, you are the most inane thing on the internet. Are you capable of writing a sentence that isn’t the same idiotic garble you wrote in the last 8000 comments? I can make every comment you’ve written in the last 2 years out of some combination the following:
Citation needed. liar and bullshitter. OPINION!!!! Citation needed. Scum MRA opinion bullshitter! Liberturd! MEpinon!!
If you can’t manage anything better than that then you should shut up, because your writing is an affront to the English language, and human communication in general.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-777241
Someone had to do it.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:04 pm
by Sunder
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:06 pm
by Spike13
deLurch wrote:
Yes, all of the evidence pz said he refused to look at. As he said, he no longer considers himself a skeptic.
BOOM! The hammer of truth come down!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:07 pm
by deLurch
Steersman wrote:Indeed. As for "shitty behaviour", one might argue that Stollznow was first guilty of using the "mustard gas" of making public accusations on virtually no evidence, and that neither she nor her supporters have much of a leg to stand on if the tables are turned - particularly if her charges are looking a lot less credible than his counter-charges. Sow the wind and all that.
I concur. Once you start hurling around accusations of sexual assault and harassment, a person has every right to respond with evidence.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:11 pm
by Spike13
Old_ones wrote:Hurin wrote:Nerd of Dedhead
Citation need, or you lie and bullshit. Nothing anybody says in defense of BR without evidence is dismissed. Scum is rotting….
Radford posted documentation of his claims which PZ won’t allow linking to. Interesting, that. I’m sure it has nothing at all to do with the fact that PZ picked a side before he had any awareness of what evidence might be out there.
On an unrelated note, you are the most inane thing on the internet. Are you capable of writing a sentence that isn’t the same idiotic garble you wrote in the last 8000 comments? I can make every comment you’ve written in the last 2 years out of some combination the following:
Citation needed. liar and bullshitter. OPINION!!!! Citation needed. Scum MRA opinion bullshitter! Liberturd! MEpinon!!
If you can’t manage anything better than that then you should shut up, because your writing is an affront to the English language, and human communication in general.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-777241
Someone had to do it.
As a former affront to he English language, I give my full support to this statement.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:11 pm
by Gefan
Mykeru wrote:
I don't do honey. We need the good cop
What?
No good?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:11 pm
by James Caruthers
Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.
His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:12 pm
by deLurch
TiBo wrote:Oh boy, I hope IndieGogo has a refund policy. :lol:
Nope.
http://support.indiegogo.com/hc/en-us/a ... 76-Refunds
But I wonder would indigogo would do about fraudulently obtained funds. Indigogo already has a policy against fund raisers that cause harm to individuals. Karen's claims which according to Ben are unfounded defamation would suggest that Indigogo would want to have it taken down.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:16 pm
by Guestus Aurelius
Yes, I could definitely see how copying and pasting and forwarding e-mails multiple times might result in all the dates being exactly right except for the years, which now coincidentally match (rather than contradict) the timeline of the harassment accusations. And surely all that is completely unrelated to the excerpts' in question having been removed from their original (harmless) context.
:bjarte:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:16 pm
by Spike13
James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.
His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:16 pm
by Quiz
Sitting back and enjoying Mykeru tweeting to Batxtor :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:16 pm
by deLurch
Clarence wrote:If this evidence holds up, this will follow Stollznow EVERYWHERE in the wider skeptic community, and, depending, she might even get dropped as a 'liability' by the SJW's - though most of them seem so deluded I suspect she'll always have some support from some of them.
If conference organizers determined that she lied to them and fabricated evidence by back dating emails in order to attempt to get Ben Radford black listed from their events, I wonder if they will wash their hands of her.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:18 pm
by Tapir
http://i.imgur.com/cmunl0h.jpg
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!
Honestly, all three of them sound fucking mental.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:19 pm
by James Caruthers
JacquesCuze wrote:Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg
He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".
He's probably just a Nice Guy, and he was busy being a Nice Guy and got upset when he thought he had hurt the kitten. Which Karen of course abused by peeping his laptop.
Baxter may very well be a genuinely kind soul, but he sounds like a sucker on twitter when he describes how Karen "cut and pasted" emails to him. And after all the lying he claims to have witnessed from her end, he still believes that she is being honest about this shit.
I just have to say, any woman who snoops my laptop is out the door. It's usually a good sign of nutso instability.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:20 pm
by deLurch
James Caruthers wrote:Forget Shermer, if this is the standard FTB response, I bet Karen is also fapping, just imagining the huge piles of cash she'll be able to milk out of this newest moral outrage.
That is my thought. You can't stop the freight train of stupid that fast. He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:22 pm
by James Caruthers
Spike13 wrote:James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.
His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger
Me too.
He was curiously silent on the whole Schism thing, but I think he's finally seeing the writing on the wall. For a guy who made a youtube career out of challenging ideas openly in a public forum (youtube), what the SJWs are trying to accomplish is the ideological opposite of his own approach.
But hey, you also don't have to be Einstein to see how transparently racist and sexist someone like Suey Park is.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:22 pm
by Mykeru
Gefan wrote:Mykeru wrote:
I don't do honey. We need the good cop
What?
No good?
Now that was funny. And Bax took it in stride. Like he was resigned.
http://www.marieclaire.com/cm/marieclai ... abbit1.jpg
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:23 pm
by Sunder
deLurch wrote:He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.
If he's confident he can win then provoking them into donating further just means she has more money they can go after for damages.
Also, Hurin's comment got disappeared.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:25 pm
by JacquesCuze
Guestus Aurelius wrote:
Yes, I could definitely see how copying and pasting and forwarding e-mails multiple times might result in all the dates being exactly right except for the years, which now coincidentally match (rather than contradict) the timeline of the harassment accusations. And surely all that is completely unrelated to the excerpts' in question having been removed from their original (harmless) context.
:bjarte:
Related:
In the comments at PeeZus' the claim is made that Google, (or any third party) would turn over server logs to lawyers in a civil suit.
http://i.imgur.com/W8vKd26.jpg
Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?
What in law or the Constitution enables that?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:26 pm
by Selenite
deLurch wrote:Clarence wrote:If this evidence holds up, this will follow Stollznow EVERYWHERE in the wider skeptic community, and, depending, she might even get dropped as a 'liability' by the SJW's - though most of them seem so deluded I suspect she'll always have some support from some of them.
If conference organizers determined that she lied to them and fabricated evidence by back dating emails in order to attempt to get Ben Radford black listed from their events, I wonder if they will wash their hands of her.
I'm wondering if the blowback will hit PZ, too. At this point, he's pretty much admitted to knowing that allegatoins were based on false/forged information and hiding that.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:26 pm
by BarnOwl
PZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 10:20 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Don’t get cocky. Apparently, Radford’s lawyer has a bit of a reputation as a rabid dog…there’s been some difficulty getting representation because everyone hates to go up against him and deal with the slime. Doing a public data dump to poison the well sounds like exactly the kind of thing this guy would do to win, win, win.
You can also tell what their court case would be. “She’s a slut, she’s mean and vindictive, so she deserves to be punished.†And there are many people who will fall for that.
True dat - there are many people who fall for mean and vindictive sluts.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:27 pm
by Spike13
James Caruthers wrote:JacquesCuze wrote:Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
So Baxter, please: get out now! And take the cat with you. She'll kill the cat.
The police report about Baxter and the kitten bothered me.
http://i.imgur.com/spCCWMn.jpg
He "bumps" the kitten on the nose and ends up taking it to the vet? That was some "bump".
He's probably just a Nice Guy, and he was busy being a Nice Guy and got upset when he thought he had hurt the kitten. Which Karen of course abused by peeping his laptop.
Baxter may very well be a genuinely kind soul, but he sounds like a sucker on twitter when he describes how Karen "cut and pasted" emails to him. And after all the lying he claims to have witnessed from her end, he still believes that she is being honest about this shit.
I just have to say, any woman who snoops my laptop is out the door. It's usually a good sign of nutso instability.
YES!!!
When I was married I wouldn't go into my wife's purse without permission.
Privacy is a mark of trust. Abuse it at your cost!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:27 pm
by deLurch
Mykeru wrote:Dude doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.
Baxter doesn't need abuse.
He needs to be told to wise up, review the evidence with friends and run before his head is on the next chopping block.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:28 pm
by Lsuoma
deLurch wrote:James Caruthers wrote:Forget Shermer, if this is the standard FTB response, I bet Karen is also fapping, just imagining the huge piles of cash she'll be able to milk out of this newest moral outrage.
That is my thought. You can't stop the freight train of stupid that fast. He should have held this quite until Karen's Indigogo fund had closed in two weeks time. Any attention this situation gets will only increase her funding.
Which may mean he has more to collect from her if he wins. If she's raised $100K by the time this goes to trial and then says she's poor as a church mouse and can't account for where her six figures have gone?
The attorneys might clean her out (D&C?), but I don't see how this can hurt Radders if he has an attorney working on contingency.
Plus she's guilty as fuck on the face of it - *SHE'S AUSTRALIAN*
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:28 pm
by Aneris
Spike13 wrote:James Caruthers wrote:Darkmatter2525 confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist.
His comment is on the newest thunderfoot video.
I always liked Dark matter...even if he drives an awesome wussy lotus instead of a Charger
What does it even mean, he “confirmed for Pitter/Slymeshit/Rapist�
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:29 pm
by James Caruthers
The only person who really loses on this one is Baxter. He looks like a chump to the pro-Radford side, and the pro-Stollznow side will notice upon reading the police report information that Baxter accused their goddess of Domestic Violence.
Some day, men will learn to stop simping for insane, vindictive BPD women. But not today.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:31 pm
by Lsuoma
JacquesCuze wrote:
In the comments at PeeZus' the claim is made that Google, (or any third party) would turn over server logs to lawyers in a civil suit.
http://i.imgur.com/W8vKd26.jpg
Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?
What in law or the Constitution enables that?
Marcus Ranum is completely full of shit. He's talking out his arse.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:32 pm
by Sunder
JacquesCuze wrote:Is that the case? That any business or third party can be compelled to turn over documents, property, evidence, etc., for civil cases that otherwise don't involve them?
What in law or the Constitution enables that?
I'm not a legal expert, but to my knowledge yes, that's standard practice with subpeonas. The court can either order you to appear and give testimony or to provide documents and material evidence.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:33 pm
by BarnOwl
[youtube]foMQX9ZExsE[/youtube]
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:34 pm
by Gefan
JacquesCuze wrote:
It certainly doesn't help Stollznow for PZ to tweet all her dox are out.
Well, it helps the Hostage Rescue Team find the house, I guess.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:35 pm
by Spike13
BarnOwl wrote:
PZ Myers
2 April 2014 at 10:20 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Don’t get cocky. Apparently, Radford’s lawyer has a bit of a reputation as a rabid dog…there’s been some difficulty getting representation because everyone hates to go up against him and deal with the slime. Doing a public data dump to poison the well sounds like exactly the kind of thing this guy would do to win, win, win.
You can also tell what their court case would be. “She’s a slut, she’s mean and vindictive, so she deserves to be punished.†And there are many people who will fall for that.
True dat - there are many people who fall for mean and vindictive sluts.
Mean and vindictive sluts you say?..hmmmm..got any phone numbers?..