If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

Quoting from Zvan's post plugging the Slymepit:

There are a number of problems with that statement, of course. First of all, we don’t know enough about Shakespeare to know that he was white. It’s probably, but not anything like a given in Elizabethan England.

Not only do we not know that Shakespeare is white, we don't even know that he was a man! Who is to say that he didn't identify as a womyn, or a trans-otherkin pixie ala "The Tempest". Or as one of our Slymepit sleuths recently pointed out he may have actually been his sister Joan.
Maybe Dawkins isn't a white supremacist after all!

More words of wisdom from that first rate and superexcellent professional writer, Stefunny InZvanity:

No one quotes Shakespeare’s poetry.

link: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... nt-1079938

:shhh:

:dance:

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:TiBo: you've been linked to by the huge Cvanatee.

Ape+Lust: your scat munching 'shoop also gets some love from Insvanity.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... d-dawkins/

Yup. And her post shows how closely the #FTBullies monitor the Pit ^^

ThatPrivilegedFatWhiteWoman wrote:FuperSuck there? He hangs out at the Slyme Pit, where he calls himself TiBo. In fact, he went there to brag about having scored Dawkins’ approval for his tweet.

Hi Steph, how y'all doin over there ? http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/mooni ... -dance.gif
I'm a bit disappointed you already forgot about the GSC/Twatson moustache incident ^^

Really? wrote:

Tapir wrote:Natalie has been re-tweeting Suey fucking Park ffs.

Look out, Jerry Seinfeld! There's a new #1 standup in town!

Gotta say I find her fucking hilarious.

Dick Strawkins wrote:

didymos wrote:

Boo-fucking-hoo. Maybe stop joining in on twitter pile-ons, Nat?

Imagine that - call someone a white supremacist and they go ahead and block you on twitter!
At long last, have you left no sense of decency? :cry:

I know, right!!?
What did she fucking expect? They're losing their fucking minds because he has the temerity to politely defend himself from the extreme hyperbole they fling at him.

Tigzy wrote:Hahaaa!

Dawkins' transgressions hit Zvan! She again reveals herself to be a secret - well, okay, not-so-secret - pitlurker by linking to Ape's turd-muncher 'shop. Zvan declares the Dawk a de facto Slymepitter. She's very cross.

Welcome Dawkins. Here's your customary fuck off.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... d-dawkins/
http://www.freezepage.com/1403984645ENCRGRZDRH

You've all been fooled. I was Richard Dawkins this whole time!!!

Word for word, because this is a direct quotation, Stephanie Zvan wrote:On Twitter, Richard Dawkins replied to AN EVIL SLYMEPITTER!!! Ipso facto, Dawkins is AN EVIL SLYMEPITTER!!! (Never mind that Dawkins probably has no idea what the Slymepit is, as demonstrated by his having only just now learned the phrase Social Justice Warrior.)

Yes, PZ. Don't you hate it when someone uses unrepresentative examples to smear a group? :roll:

Yes, Suey, people are laughing at you. You being a dipshit, you don't realize that's not a good thing. Well, for you.

jimthepleb wrote:

Really? wrote:
Look out, Jerry Seinfeld! There's a new #1 standup in town!

Gotta say I find her fucking hilarious.

Gotta say, I find her fucking sexayyyy
Ahh, marital bliss!
*Imagines the white picket fence, the 2 beautiful kids (don't worry, Suey , baby, that Eucli was just a FLING! I wanna REAL woman!), the many funny evenings discussing serious "SJW" topics, the wonderful Asian cooking...shit, wonder how she would look in a traditional chinese dress...*

PZ is a quotemining dick.

There's some fine, fine idiocy on Zvan's Dawkins thread:

cethis
June 28, 2014 at 2:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Why only three? With our technology we should be able put a variety of works on a DVD that can be put on a spaceship. (Which is what his original tweet was about.) Heck, even the Voyager ships were able to put more information on their discs than what Dawkins is mussing about.

Yeah, but DVDs are capable of carrying a great deal more info than the equivalent of 140 ASCII characters, dummy.

kellym
June 28, 2014 at 2:45 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
It took me a while to realize that Dawkins, and his friend, James Randi, are slymepitters. In that, they fully support they goals, and every act of harassment and misogyny, of the slime. The evidence is overwhelming, though I tried to deny it for years, especially for Randi, who I genuinely used to admire. I’m grateful that I learned of his true lack of integrity while he’s still alive. That’s the only “good” the slime has ever done. That and keeping me from wasting my time and money on other atheist organizations they’ve similarly helped expose.

And a hearty fuck off to you too Randi!

Tigzy wrote:There's some fine, fine idiocy on Zvan's Dawkins thread:

cethis
June 28, 2014 at 2:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Why only three? With our technology we should be able put a variety of works on a DVD that can be put on a spaceship. (Which is what his original tweet was about.) Heck, even the Voyager ships were able to put more information on their discs than what Dawkins is mussing about.

Yeah, but DVDs are capable of carrying a great deal more info than the equivalent of 140 ASCII characters, dummy.

kellym
June 28, 2014 at 2:45 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
It took me a while to realize that Dawkins, and his friend, James Randi, are slymepitters. In that, they fully support they goals, and every act of harassment and misogyny, of the slime. The evidence is overwhelming, though I tried to deny it for years, especially for Randi, who I genuinely used to admire. I’m grateful that I learned of his true lack of integrity while he’s still alive. That’s the only “good” the slime has ever done. That and keeping me from wasting my time and money on other atheist organizations they’ve similarly helped expose.

And a hearty fuck off to you too Randi!

I'm clearly Dawkins (couldn't you guess by my carefully disguised nym?) but which one of you bastards is Randi?

Dick Strawkins wrote: I'm clearly Dawkins (couldn't you guess by my carefully disguised nym?) but which one of you bastards is Randi?

My money's on Clarence.

Clarence you need another shot of bromide old man.....

Dick Strawkins wrote:

Tigzy wrote:There's some fine, fine idiocy on Zvan's Dawkins thread:

cethis
June 28, 2014 at 2:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Why only three? With our technology we should be able put a variety of works on a DVD that can be put on a spaceship. (Which is what his original tweet was about.) Heck, even the Voyager ships were able to put more information on their discs than what Dawkins is mussing about.

Yeah, but DVDs are capable of carrying a great deal more info than the equivalent of 140 ASCII characters, dummy.

kellym
June 28, 2014 at 2:45 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
It took me a while to realize that Dawkins, and his friend, James Randi, are slymepitters. In that, they fully support they goals, and every act of harassment and misogyny, of the slime. The evidence is overwhelming, though I tried to deny it for years, especially for Randi, who I genuinely used to admire. I’m grateful that I learned of his true lack of integrity while he’s still alive. That’s the only “good” the slime has ever done. That and keeping me from wasting my time and money on other atheist organizations they’ve similarly helped expose.

And a hearty fuck off to you too Randi!

I'm clearly Dawkins (couldn't you guess by my carefully disguised nym?) but which one of you bastards is Randi?

I'm Dawkins, and so's my wife.

(Somebody had to.)

Imagine a bowl of Richard Dawkins flavoured M&Ms and 10% of them been touched by an evel Slymepitter...

Clarence wrote:

jimthepleb wrote:

Really? wrote:
Look out, Jerry Seinfeld! There's a new #1 standup in town!

Gotta say I find her fucking hilarious.

Gotta say, I find her fucking sexayyyy
Ahh, marital bliss!
*Imagines the white picket fence, the 2 beautiful kids (don't worry, Suey , baby, that Eucli was just a FLING! I wanna REAL woman!), the many funny evenings discussing serious "SJW" topics, the wonderful Asian cooking...shit, wonder how she would look in a traditional chinese dress...*

Uhum, so you got yellow fever, aaiiight? But seriously, can you imagine ANY sane man putting up with the amount of SJ gibberish she produces each day ? I can't. But maybe that's not the problem, but the solution. Maybe she should be looking out for a deaf man.

TiBo wrote:

Couldn't help myself :D I think "transplain" didn't exist yet, but it came so naturally, I just had to use it :whistle:

'Transplain' is definitely a keeper. Brilliant. Exactly what she and many of her ilk do routinely.

But seriously, calling Dawkins a "white supremacist" for happening to prefer Shakespeare to Benjamin Zephaniah...it's really a new low for the SJWs, isn't it? What an utterly disgusting human being, trading entirely on her victim cred to spew the most idiotic, slanderous filth because she is protected by transphobia.

Cunt. Worthless, repulsive cunt. I hate her.

In the fuss about Shakespeare, nobody mentioned the real truth - it's much better in the original Klingon:

[youtube]CiRMGYQfXrs[/youtube]

John Greg wrote:didymos said (http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 60#p195260):

That's how almost all her tweets are. She's comically inept at twitter.

Actually, she's kind of comically inept at writing in general. When she was still at TFB, her posts were often the longest ever seen there, very often extending beyond 5000 words with something that could quite easily be said in 500-1000 words at the most.

I got into a tangle with her when I first pointed out some instances of how she could easily shorten her prose making it both more readable and more understandable. Like most tran-people, or so it would seem, she flew off into a raging rage and declared me anti-trans, a hater, and a misogynist who could probably be applied to by her favorite, non-hateful, non-exclusionary, non-biased phrase, Die Cis Scum. A phrase that, by the way, she vociferously defends as not hateful, not biased, not hostile, but only as accurately reflecting the supposed reality that all Cis people want all trans-people to cease to exist.

HAHAHA! Now that I have let loose my inner Natalie Screed, and written far too many words, I will cease and disist.

Don't you mean cease and die cis?

:whistle:

An obviously biased article (it's a TERF website), but there's enough real background stuff included to indicate that a lot of it is true
- some of what Natalie Reed has been doing since she left FTB.

https://gendertrender.wordpress.com/tag/natalie-reed/

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.c ... =480&h=235

Apparently she was involved in a protest against a feminist remembrance service for the women killed by mass murderer Marc Lépine at L’Ecole Polytechnique because there wasn't enough trans involvement.

She has also been involved in some interesting pushing of the boundaries of surgical know-how!

She was attempting to have a particular form of gender reassignment surgery done - just not the usual male to female alteration.
She wanted to have a sexually functional vagina (in terms of sexual pleasure rather than producing a baby!) which would have a clitoris, but she wanted to keep her penis.

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.c ... =480&h=255

In other words she wanted an operation to create the appearance of a physical hemaphrodyte.
I'm not sure if this is possible - I think the nerves that serve the penis in males are the same that serve the clitoris in females - which is why a clitoris in M2F cases is usually constructed out of the same nerves from the surgically altered penis.

Fair enough, if it's possible and her health service provides for it then go for it.
It's her body and she can do what she likes with it.
But there does seem to be a pattern emerging of transwomen with penises who are furious that they are not being accepted as women - and often as queer women, and the non-acceptance is most often coming from the lesbian community. This group of trans activists seem to be the most vocal of their community and are creating the image in most people's heads of trans women in general being like this extreme group.

Clarence wrote:

jimthepleb wrote:

Really? wrote:
Look out, Jerry Seinfeld! There's a new #1 standup in town!

Gotta say I find her fucking hilarious.

Gotta say, I find her fucking sexayyyy
Ahh, marital bliss!
*Imagines the white picket fence, the 2 beautiful kids (don't worry, Suey , baby, that Eucli was just a FLING! I wanna REAL woman!), the many funny evenings discussing serious "SJW" topics, the wonderful Asian cooking...shit, wonder how she would look in a traditional chinese dress...*

This is why people think you're weird, Clarence.

Geez. Oolon retweeted ageism?

Søren Lilholt wrote:

TiBo wrote:

Couldn't help myself :D I think "transplain" didn't exist yet, but it came so naturally, I just had to use it :whistle:

'Transplain' is definitely a keeper. Brilliant. Exactly what she and many of her ilk do routinely.

But seriously, calling Dawkins a "white supremacist" for happening to prefer Shakespeare to Benjamin Zephaniah...it's really a new low for the SJWs, isn't it? What an utterly disgusting human being, trading entirely on her victim cred to spew the most idiotic, slanderous filth because she is protected by transphobia.

Cunt. Worthless, repulsive cunt. I hate her.

Not the first time he's been called a "white supremacist." Black Skeptic Sikivu Hutchinson called not just him, but pretty much the whole atheist movement "white supremacist" and that the "Four Horsemen" were their chaplains.

[youtube]xhYKlEggiNY[/youtube]

Skip to 45:55 for the relevant portion. Once again I will express my bewilderment as to why this racist, sexist, bigoted piece of shit has been given a platform, and is repeatedly given a platform, to spout her drivel. Ah, yes, and Watson just nods her head throughout the whole thing. Like two peas in a pod.

Tony Parsehole wrote:What???

Notice how they dragged Stephen Fry's twitter account into this? Simply pulling his name out of their arse wasn't enough apparently. They had to actually add him in.

Because he's a gay British person they've heard of. Fry is, of course, a well known atheist and generally anti-woo. I wonder if they've seen this.

Really? wrote:Geez. Oolon retweeted ageism?

What did you expect? Principles? Pfft.

Scatwoman wrote:First of all, we don’t know enough about Shakespeare to know that he was white. It’s probably, but not anything like a given in Elizabethan England.

I forgot to mention: De Vere was a Paki.

If you're a SJW who has trouble coming up with an insult for the person you're about to falsely report as a Twitter spammer, simply chuck a dart at this board and you'll have the derogatory label you need to really impress Oolon.

http://imgur.com/ygc0vTw.jpg

Guest wrote:

That's pretty close to the truth.

John Greg wrote:More words of wisdom from that first rate and superexcellent professional writer, Stefunny InZvanity:

No one quotes Shakespeare’s poetry.

link: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... nt-1079938

:shhh:

:dance:

To Stephanie

Shall I compare thee to a pile of shit?
Thou art more hideous and more noxious:
Rough winds do shake the remnants of your wit,
And FreeThought's leash doth make you doxious;
Sometime too blatant are your sland'rous lies,
And often is your dull complexion flushed;
And every time when Zvan to libel someone tries,
By chance or nature's changing course she's crushed;
But thy eternal odour shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that shit thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this takes life from thee.

(With apologies to Will.)

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:

Scatwoman wrote:First of all, we don’t know enough about Shakespeare to know that he was white. It’s probably, but not anything like a given in Elizabethan England.

I forgot to mention: De Vere was a Paki.

Case closed then.
Not old dead white guy...
rote shaekspeers plaes? unpossibul.

Clarence wrote:

jimthepleb wrote:

Really? wrote:
Look out, Jerry Seinfeld! There's a new #1 standup in town!

Gotta say I find her fucking hilarious.

Gotta say, I find her fucking sexayyyy
Ahh, marital bliss!
*Imagines the white picket fence, the 2 beautiful kids (don't worry, Suey , baby, that Eucli was just a FLING! I wanna REAL woman!), the many funny evenings discussing serious "SJW" topics, the wonderful Asian cooking...shit, wonder how she would look in a traditional chinese dress...*

Unless it's twins, you're not getting two kids out of her as she'll castrate you during the third trimester...

Jan Steen wrote:

John Greg wrote:More words of wisdom from that first rate and superexcellent professional writer, Stefunny InZvanity:

No one quotes Shakespeare’s poetry.

link: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... nt-1079938

:shhh:

:dance:

To Stephanie

Shall I compare thee to a pile of shit?
Thou art more hideous and more noxious:
Rough winds do shake the remnants of your wit,
And FreeThought's leash doth make you doxious;
Sometime too blatant are your sland'rous lies,
And often is your dull complexion flushed;
And every time when Zvan to libel someone tries,
By chance or nature's changing course she's crushed;
But thy eternal odour shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that shit thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this takes life from thee.

(With apologies to Will.)

:cry:
Now that, that is,.... that's beautiful mate, beautiful.

Cunt of Personality wrote:Imagine a bowl of Richard Dawkins flavoured M&Ms and 10% of them been touched by an evel Slymepitter...

We can't know which M&Ms were touched by an evil slymeshitter, so we better toss them all into a fire and dance around it.

jimthepleb wrote:Clarence you need another shot of bromide old man.....

I wish he'd stop trying so hard to convince us that he's not a virgin.

Jan Steen wrote:
To Stephanie

Shall I compare thee to a pile of shit?
Thou art more hideous and more noxious:
Rough winds do shake the remnants of your wit,
And FreeThought's leash doth make you doxious;
Sometime too blatant are your sland'rous lies,
And often is your dull complexion flushed;
And every time when Zvan to libel someone tries,
By chance or nature's changing course she's crushed;
But thy eternal odour shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that shit thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this takes life from thee.

(With apologies to Will.)

Cultural appropriation! :o

I hope you are European and white, my friend. Otherwise, you're appropriating muh culture!

But seriously, stop trying to steal Dog Puke's "best post" award with this good shit.

real horrorshow wrote: Because he's a gay British person they've heard of. Fry is, of course, a well known atheist and generally anti-woo. I wonder if they've seen this.

I didn't know he was gay, or care that he's gay. The only important thing is that he's FUNNY when I watch him.

This whole debate about who's a better author blah blah blah (even if Dawkins didn't intend it like that, only that he was giving his PERSONAL choice) reminds me of that scene from Django Unchained.

[youtube]bfL6CdHC6bQ[/youtube]

Tribble wrote:

real horrorshow wrote: Because he's a gay British person they've heard of. Fry is, of course, a well known atheist and generally anti-woo. I wonder if they've seen this.

I didn't know he was gay, or care that he's gay. The only important thing is that he's FUNNY when I watch him.

fry is one of those contemptible people who doesn't define himself by his sexuality.

Sunder wrote:

Opyt wrote:How does one get bumped up to Level 1 if they're allegedly blocked by all those whom you could offend? I heard Mykeru's theory on how he personally became Level 1, but I don't think I'm going to be able to follow the same path. :violin:

How do the levels work? What's the difference between being blocked, being extra blocked, and being super duper double secret probation blocked deluxe with cheese?

Mmmm, cheese.

Aneris wrote:There is no difference. It doubles as an online pillory, which is arguably its main function. That way the Social Justice League (which is social justice faction within the atheist-skeptics "movement") can maintain that there is an evil team, which gives their status as an horrible oppressed minority a thin veneer of credibility.

And it's free-to-play! One question: in character creation, do we get to design our own costumes and choose what what super-powers we get?

If you ask me Dawkins was authoring the SC twitter, also Tibo, is it possible his reply to you was satirizing the SJW blockbot.

Za-zen wrote:If you ask me Dawkins was authoring the SC twitter, also Tibo, is it possible his reply to you was satirizing the SJW blockbot.

Suey, is that you ? Pls rephrase.

Za-zen wrote:If you ask me Dawkins was authoring the SC twitter, also Tibo, is it possible his reply to you was satirizing the SJW blockbot.

Speaking of Dawkins and Twitter, I was amused that he just retweeted this response to him:

Dawkins be trollin

John Greg wrote:More words of wisdom from that first rate and superexcellent professional writer, Stefunny InZvanity:

No one quotes Shakespeare’s poetry.

link: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... nt-1079938

:shhh:

:dance:

[youtube]Okfovb7Aa0s[/youtube]

"Everybody says Shakespeare's so great. Well how come nobody's ever heard of him?"

IIRC Dawkins, Fry and Douglas Adams were all early internet adopters and are/were good friends.

real horrorshow wrote:

Tony Parsehole wrote:What???

Notice how they dragged Stephen Fry's twitter account into this? Simply pulling his name out of their arse wasn't enough apparently. They had to actually add him in.

Because he's a gay British person they've heard of. Fry is, of course, a well known atheist and generally anti-woo. I wonder if they've seen this.

Here's one for you:

I have today discovered there is a creationist author called Bill Cooper, who, in his book "After the Flood: The Early Post-Flood History of Europe Traced Back to Noah", advances the claim, apparently in all seriousness, that url=http://www.mhpbooks.com/grendel-was-a-t ... ry-critic/]Grendel, the monster from Beowulf, was (a) real, and (b) a Tyrannosaurus Rex[/u].

I'm still not as flabbergasted as I am by the claim that Richard Dawkins, for expressing admiration for Einstein, Shakespeare and Schubert, is a white supremacist.

TiBo, bravo for coining "transplain".

Aargh. Failed to hit the preview button. here's that link working properly.

Wowbagger's idea for a pub:

The Inn in a Fire

Wowbagger's idea for a hippie shirt shop:

Dye In A Fire

Tigzy wrote:Hahaaa!

Dawkins' transgressions hit Zvan! She again reveals herself to be a secret - well, okay, not-so-secret - pitlurker by linking to Ape's turd-muncher 'shop. Zvan declares the Dawk a de facto Slymepitter. She's very cross.

Welcome Dawkins. Here's your customary fuck off.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... d-dawkins/
http://www.freezepage.com/1403984645ENCRGRZDRH

"Delicate feelings" of @FuperSuck. :lol: :lol:

Pitchguest wrote:Wowbagger's idea for a pub:

The Inn in a Fire

Ok, someone punch me in the head pls. I'm just having a deja vu of a deja vu. I remember having answered to something like this before because I had remembered something like this even before that. All here on teh slymepit.com

Apparently Richard Dawkins tried to harass Stephen Fry but luckily Michael Shermer was there to intervene and managed to intercept the grabbing hands.

welch wrote:

didymos wrote:

Yep. Practically a fucking Klan member at this point.

I love the "authority" bit. Like what can he really do. Say something stern to you in an english accent seems to be the limit of his power.

Dawkins is, basically, retired - he's 73 after all. His 'authority' stems solely from having spent decades writing books which a lot of people choose to read and giving talks which a lot of people choose to listen to. Natalie Reed is free to do likewise - if she can.

piginthecity wrote:Apparently Richard Dawkins tried to harass Stephen Fry but luckily Michael Shermer was there to intervene and managed to intercept the grabbing hands.

What a monster!

Shermer, not Dawkins.

Dick Strawkins wrote:

didymos wrote:

Boo-fucking-hoo. Maybe stop joining in on twitter pile-ons, Nat?

Imagine that - call someone a white supremacist and they go ahead and block you on twitter!
At long last, have you left no sense of decency? :cry:

I note that Zvan never mentioned Natalie Reed's calling Dawkins a white supremacist. Why am I not surprised.

Tony Parsehole wrote:

Dick Strawkins wrote:

didymos wrote:

Boo-fucking-hoo. Maybe stop joining in on twitter pile-ons, Nat?

Imagine that - call someone a white supremacist and they go ahead and block you on twitter!
At long last, have you left no sense of decency? :cry:

I know, right!!?
What did she fucking expect? They're losing their fucking minds because he has the temerity to politely defend himself from the extreme hyperbole they fling at him.

How dare he not beg their forgiveness.

Tigzy wrote:There's some fine, fine idiocy on Zvan's Dawkins thread:

cethis
June 28, 2014 at 2:44 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
Why only three? With our technology we should be able put a variety of works on a DVD that can be put on a spaceship. (Which is what his original tweet was about.) Heck, even the Voyager ships were able to put more information on their discs than what Dawkins is mussing about.

Yeah, but DVDs are capable of carrying a great deal more info than the equivalent of 140 ASCII characters, dummy.

kellym
June 28, 2014 at 2:45 pm (UTC -5) Link to this comment
It took me a while to realize that Dawkins, and his friend, James Randi, are slymepitters. In that, they fully support they goals, and every act of harassment and misogyny, of the slime. The evidence is overwhelming, though I tried to deny it for years, especially for Randi, who I genuinely used to admire. I’m grateful that I learned of his true lack of integrity while he’s still alive. That’s the only “good” the slime has ever done. That and keeping me from wasting my time and money on other atheist organizations they’ve similarly helped expose.

And a hearty fuck off to you too Randi!

(to the tune of "there's another santa claus" by Bob Rivers)

"there's another slymepitter
there's another slymepitter
there's another slymepitter there!

Everywhere you look
you'll see another slymepitter
slymepitters everywhere

cunts are bleeding
virgins pleading
hate on twitter all night

hide under yo' bed
cover up yo' head
slymepitters are out tonight!

there's another slymepitter
there's another slymepitter
there's another slymepitter there!

Dawkins, randi,
sure are handy
make slymepitters look all right

Drinking coffee
eating toffee
shopping stef eatin' shite.

Oh the pain
the mental drain
from slymepitters every night"

piginthecity wrote:Apparently Richard Dawkins tried to harass Stephen Fry but luckily Michael Shermer was there to intervene and managed to intercept the grabbing hands.

Well I'm pretty sure that that's a lie because someone with Carrie Poppy-like credentials told me that Shermer was off with Lawrence Krauss and Chris Hitchens having a circle jerk while the Dawkins attempted harassing was allegedly going on. :drool: