Page 3 of 1076
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:51 pm
by Spike13
justinvacula wrote:
[youtube]FMnTQEvHb1A[/youtube]
In the dark of night
Abusing a portion of light
While others are sleeping
And some are escaping
A serpent spews out fantasy
Unjustified blasphemy
That cannot be condoned
Gotta love pointy headed guitars!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:51 pm
by KiwiInOz
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:53 pm
by Ape+lust
I thought the story was that the lawyer
offered to send him stuff, but Peez, being disgusted as befits a gentleman, refused it. Did I imagine that?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:53 pm
by Pitchguest
decius wrote:Suddenly, privacy matters.
Decius! Hey. You're back. :D
Come in! Have a seat. We have :popcorn: lots of :popcorn:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:54 pm
by Gumby
Hopefully, the Midnight Marauder is getting ready for tonight's fun.
http://theblameonmame.files.wordpress.c ... o1_500.gif
Prediction: PZ soon gives Cainaji and/or another top lickspittle the ability to remove posts and ban.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:54 pm
by Really?
AndrewV69 wrote:ERV wrote:I really really really, really, hope nothing happens to Baxter. I am genuinely concerned about this mans physical safety after this has been made public, and I really hope he has somewhere safe to stay. I've got a very bad feeling about this.
It looks like you see it coming too. Any bets she will wait till he is asleep first?
RIP Phil Hartman
I got my 20-inch paint can boner back.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:55 pm
by James Caruthers
Proving that Stollznow has a history of making up false accusations (letter from Baxter) and becoming violent and angry over bullshit she made up in her head (DV arrest report) is entirely pertinent to the court case re: Radford believing he has been libeled by Stollznow.
One could argue that making this info public online is shitty behavior, but it is absolutely NOT thuggish or bullying for Radford to show Stollz and her legal team what kind of evidence he is prepared to use in court. I don't know why PZ got to see this evidence before it was made public. Presumably, it's because he involved himself in something that was nothing to do with him.
No idea who is guilty or innocent of the specific charges, but Stollznow is looking more and more like a BPD abusive crazy pills popper.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:57 pm
by Spike13
OT a bit but it still amazes me that here I sit in New Jersey, trading quips with someone from Brisbane...we live in awesome times!
Well, let me bring my walker back over to Mykeru's Victrola.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:57 pm
by decius
James Caruthers wrote:And yeah, is mirroring every single damn thing Radford does on PZ's own blog (complete with childish screaming and yelling) really HELPING Stollznow's case?
He doesn't care for Stollznow one bit. He must spin fast a narrative for his dittoheads and pretend that he isn't shellshocked.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:58 pm
by Lsuoma
BTW, hello Pitguests!!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:00 pm
by Gumby
I'm sorry Ing. In a previous post I implied you weren't familiar with these legal-type thingies. You obviously read here, because you went and posted something to prove you're totes on top of this.
My sincere apologies.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:01 pm
by Guestus Aurelius
The evidence Radford presents, if on the level, demonstrates that Karen lacks integrity and credibility. Anyone who actually looks at it with an honest eye must come to that conclusion.
Doesn't mean all her claims are false, but it does mean that she's going to have to produce some damn strong evidence to convince reasonable people.
And frankly this is a pretty good fucking litmus test for reasonableness. Any third party who looks at Ben's site and comes away more convinced than ever that Karen's claims are true is an unreasonable person.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:02 pm
by dogen
Lsuoma wrote:BTW, hello Pitguests!!
23 guests? Fuck, we've got the whole horde reading tonight! Greetings, cunts!*
* "Cunts" is a totes OK, non-gendered slur -- see example usage above by Dr. Karen Stollznow, world-famous internet linguist.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:02 pm
by Spike13
James Caruthers wrote:Proving that Stollznow has a history of making up false accusations (letter from Baxter) and becoming violent and angry over bullshit she made up in her head (DV arrest report) is entirely pertinent to the court case re: Radford believing he has been libeled by Stollznow.
One could argue that making this info public online is shitty behavior, but it is absolutely NOT thuggish or bullying for Radford to show Stollz and her legal team what kind of evidence he is prepared to use in court. I don't know why PZ got to see this evidence before it was made public. Presumably, it's because he involved himself in something that was nothing to do with him.
No idea who is guilty or innocent of the specific charges, but Stollznow is looking more and more like a BPD abusive crazy pills popper.
Unfortunately, law like medicine, spares us no indignity.
All the dirty laundry comes out.
This serves as an object lesson on why it is always good to work and play well with others.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:04 pm
by Gumby
Shit, during Shermergate we had something like 60 guests FFtB lurkers at one point.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:05 pm
by TheMan
I see more than 1 court case here. Any money saved from avoiding court with Kazz will probably be used to go after PZ.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:06 pm
by Quiz
Once all this stuff gets taken care of in court, I wonder how people will react to her at TAM know she was arrested for domestic violence.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:06 pm
by Gumby
"Hank_Says", at PZ's:
Radford and his lawyer either have some strategy I don’t comprehend or they’re as fucking thick as short, wet planks.
I'm guessing the former.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:06 pm
by KiwiInOz
Gumby wrote:janine.jpg
SnipINg
It's tragic when a person lets their politics blind them to reality.
But the schadenfreude is strangely satisfying.
And the LOLs. My God, the LOLs. They just don't stop ringing.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:07 pm
by Spike13
Gumby wrote:Shit, during Shermergate we had something like 60 guests FFtB lurkers at one point.
That's a lot of cheese and crackers....
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:07 pm
by Garlic
Can anyone explain to me the point of posting that selfie? It just screams "hey, I'm a complete psycho, keep that in mind when reading the rest if my unverifiable evidence"
(Actually it's unverifiable by us, but ridiculously easy to verify by someone with access. Messing with the headers of emails sent from UC to Google, whoever did it, is a suicide move)
Also, more importantly:
Sulman wrote:What's with all the pictures of Justin Hawkins
Whatever happened to The Darkness?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:07 pm
by Spike13
Gumby wrote:Shit, during Shermergate we had something like 60 guests FFtB lurkers at one point.
That's a lot of cheese and crackers....
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:08 pm
by Gumby
HA! Janine has already linked to Mykeru's Stollz pic.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-777149
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:09 pm
by dogen
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:09 pm
by Pitchguest
dogen wrote:KS-1.13.2010.png
:bjarte:
Haha! Well, she is an Aussie after all. Habits die hard, I guess. :lol:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:09 pm
by KiwiInOz
Spike13 wrote:
OT a bit but it still amazes me that here I sit in New Jersey, trading quips with someone from Brisbane...we live in awesome times!
Well, let me bring my walker back over to Mykeru's Victrola.
Mate, it's a beautiful sunny day, here in Brisbane. And it's time for lunch.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:10 pm
by decius
The evidence presented - if genuine - also shows that many of her accusations are highly unlikely to be true. There's a significant overlap between the alleged harassment and correspondence amicable in tone.
Stockholm syndrome would have to be renamed Stollznow syndrome, for both circumstances to be true.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:10 pm
by James Caruthers
Haha.
The little troll fucker must be shitting his pants with joy.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:11 pm
by Spike13
Quiz wrote:Once all this stuff gets taken care of in court, I wonder how people will react to her at TAM know she was arrested for domestic violence.
C'mon Dom.voiolence is different for women....he deserved it!
Just like penis' being cut off is funny.
Get with the times
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:12 pm
by Cunning Punt
This is unbelievable. I keep waiting for something to finally discredit those fuckers for once and for all... could this be it? Am I too naive?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:13 pm
by James Caruthers
TheMan wrote:I see more than 1 court case here. Any money saved from avoiding court with Kazz will probably be used to go after PZ.
I doubt it. Shermer couldn't even find the spoons for a single lawsuit. Radford will be so fucking glad if he comes out of this one looking okay, that he'll leave PZ alone.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:13 pm
by Spike13
Sorry for the double post, either the I-pad locked up or I thought lsouma had me on double secret extra slow banning.
(Just kidding your facist fitness)
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:14 pm
by Steersman
James Caruthers wrote:Proving that Stollznow has a history of making up false accusations (letter from Baxter) and becoming violent and angry over bullshit she made up in her head (DV arrest report) is entirely pertinent to the court case re: Radford believing he has been libeled by Stollznow.
One could argue that making this info public online is shitty behavior, but it is absolutely NOT thuggish or bullying for Radford to show Stollz and her legal team what kind of evidence he is prepared to use in court. I don't know why PZ got to see this evidence before it was made public. Presumably, it's because he involved himself in something that was nothing to do with him.
No idea who is guilty or innocent of the specific charges, but Stollznow is looking more and more like a BPD abusive crazy pills popper.
Indeed. As for "shitty behaviour", one might argue that Stollznow was first guilty of using the "mustard gas" of making public accusations on virtually no evidence, and that neither she nor her supporters have much of a leg to stand on if the tables are turned - particularly if her charges are looking a lot less credible than his counter-charges. Sow the wind and all that.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:15 pm
by Gumby
It's amazing watching the baboons rigidly and blindly stick to their narrative. They're not even
trying to rationally look at what Radford posted.
Karen said it, I believe it, and that settles it!
http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com ... opcorn.gif
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:16 pm
by Clarence
I don't know why, but I laughed.
:clap: :clap: :clap:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:17 pm
by BarnOwl
:lol:
What is this I don't even
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:17 pm
by Pitchguest
Cunning Punt wrote:This is unbelievable. I keep waiting for something to finally discredit those fuckers for once and for all... could this be it? Am I too naive?
It very could be. But I wouldn't pop the cork just yet. People thought it was done with just the retraction letter, and oh boy did they get egg on their face.
I'm going to wait 'til the matter has settled completely. Verdict or settlement, whichever comes first.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:17 pm
by Ape+lust
Ape+lust wrote:
I thought the story was that the lawyer
offered to send him stuff, but Peez, being disgusted as befits a gentleman, refused it. Did I imagine that?
Ah, I didn't. Peez hasn't seen it because it conflicts with his narrative. Shaddup Peez, you're lying.
http://imgur.com/J8aw3sU.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-772583
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:17 pm
by Pitchguest
Cunning Punt wrote:This is unbelievable. I keep waiting for something to finally discredit those fuckers for once and for all... could this be it? Am I too naive?
It very well could be. But I wouldn't pop the cork just yet. People thought it was done with just the retraction letter, and oh boy did they get egg on their face.
I'm going to wait 'til the matter has settled completely. Verdict or settlement, whichever comes first.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:17 pm
by Really?
Quiz wrote:Once all this stuff gets taken care of in court, I wonder how people will react to her at TAM know she was arrested for domestic violence.
I agree with you. Stollznow's history of violence worries me. Will TAM be safe if she's there?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:18 pm
by Gumby
Cunning Punt wrote:This is unbelievable. I keep waiting for something to finally discredit those fuckers for once and for all... could this be it? Am I too naive?
AnswersInGenesis has been discredited for years, but like a fungal infection, they refuse to go away.
Hi CP!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:18 pm
by ConcentratedH2O, OM
From very near the beginning of the police arrest report: the officer makes it sound like this was brought up specifically by the Baxter dude. Which makes him sound like a cunt. Who knows, it's just funny. :lol: :lol: :D
http://i.imgur.com/xs8ZbQl.png
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:21 pm
by ConcentratedH2O, OM
Spike13 wrote:Gumby wrote:Shit, during Shermergate we had something like 60 guests FFtB lurkers at one point.
That's a lot of cheese and crackers....
Lsuoma's massive uncircumsised penis provides approximately 3lbs of cheese per week. We were fine.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:21 pm
by Mykeru
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:21 pm
by dogen
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:From very near the beginning of the police arrest report: the officer makes it sound like this was brought up specifically by the Baxter dude. Which makes him sound like a cunt. Who knows, it's just funny. :lol: :lol: :D
http://i.imgur.com/xs8ZbQl.png
Hey, stop beating up on Baxter. The poor guy needs all the help he can get. We should start a whip-around to get him in a witless protection scheme.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:22 pm
by TiBo
Sulman wrote:
A retreat smothered in righteous indignation is still a retreat.
He's running.
"Notice please that I have not linked to Radford’s disgusting violation of privacy, and I will not tolerate anyone else linking to it here, either."
I think a little violation of privacy is totally fine when that person tried to destroy your life. :violin:
Oh boy, I hope IndieGogo has a refund policy. :lol:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:22 pm
by Clarence
Steersman wrote:James Caruthers wrote:Proving that Stollznow has a history of making up false accusations (letter from Baxter) and becoming violent and angry over bullshit she made up in her head (DV arrest report) is entirely pertinent to the court case re: Radford believing he has been libeled by Stollznow.
One could argue that making this info public online is shitty behavior, but it is absolutely NOT thuggish or bullying for Radford to show Stollz and her legal team what kind of evidence he is prepared to use in court. I don't know why PZ got to see this evidence before it was made public. Presumably, it's because he involved himself in something that was nothing to do with him.
No idea who is guilty or innocent of the specific charges, but Stollznow is looking more and more like a BPD abusive crazy pills popper.
Indeed. As for "shitty behaviour", one might argue that Stollznow was first guilty of using the "mustard gas" of making public accusations on virtually no evidence, and that neither she nor her supporters have much of a leg to stand on if the tables are turned - particularly if her charges are looking a lot less credible than his counter-charges. Sow the wind and all that.
It's still possible (not bloody likely but possible) that this is all made up by Radford and some paid for 'experts' (or perhaps he pulled the wool over their eyes somehow too) and he really was a horrendous harrasser and those emails really WERE from 2012.
But I'm not betting on that.
My opinion is that he really cares for Karen (feels sorry for her or something) and tried -via that retraction - to make this 'go away' for his, her, and Baxter's sake. But due to the type of personality disorder she has, she can't EVER be wrong - about anything. So this was bound to end in tears. Maybe he's sad and feels he is already taking so much damage he HAS to do this - or maybe he's mad and WANTS to do this. Either way, I don't blame him.
Let Karen Stollznow serve as the poster girl for crazy and/or malicious accusers everywhere. At this point, I feel it's no more than she deserves. Maybe this will also serve to discredit some of the disgusting SJW narrative. One can only hope.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:23 pm
by dogen
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Spike13 wrote:Gumby wrote:Shit, during Shermergate we had something like 60 guests FFtB lurkers at one point.
That's a lot of cheese and crackers....
Lsuoma's massive uncircumsised penis provides approximately 3lbs of cheese per week. We were fine.
Cave-aged, bandaged cheddar?
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:24 pm
by ConcentratedH2O, OM
dogen wrote:Lsuoma wrote:BTW, hello Pitguests!!
23 guests? Fuck, we've got the whole horde reading tonight! Greetings, cunts!*
* "Cunts" is a totes OK, non-gendered slur -- see example usage above by Dr. Karen Stollznow, world-famous internet linguist.
:clap: :clap: :clap:
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:26 pm
by Spike13
Mykeru wrote:
LYINGoEZAm6a.jpg
those eyes.... So alluring....
Hey babe when your done with Baxter,well...I am a masochist...just saying...
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:26 pm
by ConcentratedH2O, OM
They're all "fucking idiots", but from my experience I'd say Janine is genuinely a low-IQ person.
Re: Mykeru, what a Cnut, eh? Discuss.
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:27 pm
by deLurch
Download and back that shit up now before it gets memory holed!!! Still digging through.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:28 pm
by CommanderTuvok
Clarence wrote:Let Karen Stollznow serve as the poster girl for crazy and/or malicious accusers everywhere. At this point, I feel it's no more than she deserves. Maybe this will also serve to discredit some of the disgusting SJW narrative. One can only hope.
She's FreeThoughtBlogs' poster girl for crazy, just as Ogvorbis is FreeThoughtBlogs' poster boy for rape. They will be forever reminded of this, just like the Daily Mail gets reminded they supported the fucking blackshirts.
Grind the fuckers down.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:28 pm
by Matt Cavanaugh
Cunning Punt wrote:This is unbelievable. I keep waiting for something to finally discredit those fuckers for once and for all... could this be it? Am I too naive?
All I know is, Michael Shermer must have a massive boner right now....
Re: Mykeru, what a Cnut, eh? Discuss.
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:29 pm
by zenbabe
deLurch wrote:
Download and back that shit up now before it gets memory holed!!! Still digging through.
He got it all, no worries :)
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:31 pm
by Tapir
So, PZ,
Posting vicarious, anonymous accusations of multiple counts of rape = OK.
Posting first-hand evidence to defend oneself against similar accusations = Sleaze.
Got it.
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:33 pm
by BarnOwl
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:34 pm
by Spike13
Redenbacher futures just went through the roof!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:35 pm
by Gumby
Tapir wrote:So, PZ,
Posting vicarious, anonymous accusations of multiple counts of rape = OK.
Posting first-hand evidence to defend oneself against similar accusations = Sleaze.
Got it.
Parallel logic rulez!
Re: Y'all come back now, y'hear?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:36 pm
by Steersman
dogen wrote:ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:From very near the beginning of the police arrest report: the officer makes it sound like this was brought up specifically by the Baxter dude. Which makes him sound like a cunt. Who knows, it's just funny. :lol: :lol: :D
http://i.imgur.com/xs8ZbQl.png
Hey, stop beating up on Baxter. The poor guy needs all the help he can get. We should start a whip-around to get him in a
witless protection scheme.
:lol: As they say, love is blind but marriage can be a real eye-opener ....