Deep nyms: left-handed son of the right hand.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Well, sorta. Sinister...Ben....Ahem...
I only add the ben when necessary though, as sinister sounded bad-ass when I was 13 and just becoming a script-kiddie.
Deep nyms: left-handed son of the right hand.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:Well, sorta. Sinister...Ben....Ahem...
Actually, if the events occurred as described and the victims located, a prosecution is quite possible, due to long SOLs for class A felonies and delayed-start SOLs for underaged victims.Old_ones wrote:There is also no way he could be prosecuted even if it were true.
Yep.Sulman wrote:Peez has been emboldened by more and more outrageous behavior going unchallenged. Less serious shit than this got Laden exiled.Mykeru wrote:
Come at me bro. See what happens. Escalate hell, The Peez's ass would be pinked by a mile-long rug burn. And he knows it.
The cat's out of the bag. No stopping it now.
I thought we were being careful about removing names before posting tweets and what not.JacquesCuze wrote:I don't want to stop the hate-on for Damion, because tonight especially it's well deserved, but I have to admit his name came across a tweet I found interesting.
[zapped]
That petition is here:
http://www.change.org/p/bay-area-scienc ... al-program
I think this petition and others like it, directed towards Skeptic and Science conferences that PZ would go to are a good thing.
Why This Petition Is A Waste Of TimeJacquesCuze wrote:I don't want to stop the hate-on for Damion, because tonight especially it's well deserved, but I have to admit his name came across a tweet I found interesting.
That petition is here:
http://www.change.org/p/bay-area-scienc ... al-program
I think this petition and others like it, directed towards Skeptic and Science conferences that PZ would go to are a good thing.
She didn't like having her own address posted online. What a hypocrite.sinister wrote:Twitter is a funny place. You would think FTB / Skepchick / et al would be a little less excited about telling the world they doxxed someone.
And I have typed 20 paragraphs and erased them all every time I finish. There just simply isn't a good way to express the depravity of these people on a forum.
I guess it's time to take up interpretive dance.
Gah! Sorry about that. I had tried to be careful most of the day about this. Thanks for pointing that out, perhaps the FT or one of his minions can fix that for me?mordacious1 wrote:I thought we were being careful about removing names before posting tweets and what not.JacquesCuze wrote:I don't want to stop the hate-on for Damion, because tonight especially it's well deserved, but I have to admit his name came across a tweet I found interesting.
[zapped]
That petition is here:
http://www.change.org/p/bay-area-scienc ... al-program
I think this petition and others like it, directed towards Skeptic and Science conferences that PZ would go to are a good thing.
As long as Shermer raped Carry Pop or whoever the fuck was that person was, then PZ is a rapist. A self-confessed one, no less.John Greg wrote:An important note: more than one person here has now directly stated that Peezus was specifically and directly accused of fucking/raping a student.
That is simply not true.
Stop the fucking bullshit.
To the best of our knowledge, based on what PeeZus said, a student threatened to accuse him of assaulting or sexually assaulting her, but so far as we know, did not carry that threat through, C'mon people get your fucking facts straight.
Jesus!
Do I need to spell it out? I bet I've been ninja'd already, huh.Really? wrote:Which leads us to wonder...JacquesCuze wrote:
My eyes are really blurry this evening, but it seems when I follow the form to allow me to report the skepchicks tweet and gives me no impression they won't investigate it.
http://i.imgur.com/iug1rwr.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/JxwK4ig.jpg
How the fuck can Melodramatic Melody and all of the other assorted braindeads on Twitter get people banned for a comment on a hashtag that they don't like?
That is a truly fine and pure example of mendacious sophistry. Perfect. You should start speech writing for Republican politicians. You could get rich.To be clear, it's not okay to say true things about Billy, but it's totes ok to say Ben fucks cows.
Got it.
Send it to the cops or shut the fuck up.d4m10n wrote:Will do, off to bed.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:...Damion could chill a bit and realize he's not exactly doing himself any favors. Either works for me.
You guys have fun protecting the identity of an admitted serial rapist.
The series of lies that he keeps telling to troll everybody. I'm not falling for that, fucko.James Caruthers wrote:
Also, "serial rapist?" That's a FTB-esque stretch of language. What is "serial" about his crime, exactly?
Speak for yourself, "sugar dumpling". I don't think 'having a blast' would be a good description of the making of a porn pic with PZ shooped into it. Unless 'having a blast' is another way of saying 'puking your guts up'.Ape+lust wrote:... he should remember that the Pit could be having a blast shooping him into porn. It would be easy. Fortunately for him, we're not seething tenured dirtbags.
Certainly more disturbing than the shit gifs. Did you really shoop that all by yourself? I imagined a platoon of shoopers, each sent in to shoop a 20x20 square of pixels, none of them privy to the entire design.Ape+lust wrote:To everybody who was properly skeeved, thank you very much! I had to rush through it myself, and I've made pics with goatse. :dance:
PZ has complained about photoshops, and surprise, surprise, he's lied about it. Most of the shoops he claims to have seen are pornographic. He's described a typical pic as a caricature with a big nose and little dick. Riiight.
So, when PZ looks in and sees himself smooching his ever lovin' sugar dumpling, he should remember that the Pit could be having a blast shooping him into porn. It would be easy. Fortunately for him, we're not seething tenured dirtbags.
I can't answer that. The incident as Oggie describes it (assuming it is true) was a singular incident. Of the two incidents he was supposedly involved in the first merely had him as much a victim as anybody and his misbehavior was confined to the second, so unless Damian knows something we don't...James Caruthers wrote:Send it to the cops or shut the fuck up.d4m10n wrote:Will do, off to bed.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:...Damion could chill a bit and realize he's not exactly doing himself any favors. Either works for me.
You guys have fun protecting the identity of an admitted serial rapist.
There's always a good chance Ogmeister's lying, and if so, you'll have doxxed someone who didn't "do" anything except lie about committing a crime. But he wasn't under oath and he could always tell the truth to the cops, in which case you're the asshole for doxxing.
Whenever we discuss Oggie, at least half of the Pit lines up on the "he's probably lying" side. You seem to think we all believe Oggie is genuine, or maybe you're being dishonest.
Also, "serial rapist?" That's a FTB-esque stretch of language. What is "serial" about his crime, exactly?
This is actually quite brilliant and is the only way I can imagine someone safely producing PZ Porn.JacquesCuze wrote:
Certainly more disturbing than the shit gifs. Did you really shoop that all by yourself? I imagined a platoon of shoopers, each sent in to shoop a 20x20 square of pixels, none of them privy to the entire design.
/ObMontyPython
While insulting Omen Man is fun, I have a more pressing question:Spike13 wrote:I was pretty ambivalent to him as well, then it was like he came in shit on the floor and wiped his ass on the drapes.bovarchist wrote:I was actually one of the few other people on the Pit that had no particular problem with Damien, but...
...he's getting on my last nerve.
I guess he got called back to the bus station men's room, those cocks ain't gonna suck themselves.
That, and while I have faith in yours (and Gumby's) strength of character, I don't think most people on the 'Pit have the stomach for anything remotely approaching PZ-in-porn.Ape+lust wrote:To everybody who was properly skeeved, thank you very much! I had to rush through it myself, and I've made pics with goatse. :dance:
PZ has complained about photoshops, and surprise, surprise, he's lied about it. Most of the shoops he claims to have seen are pornographic. He's described a typical pic as a caricature with a big nose and little dick. Riiight.
So, when PZ looks in and sees himself smooching his ever lovin' sugar dumpling, he should remember that the Pit could be having a blast shooping him into porn. It would be easy. Fortunately for him, we're not seething tenured dirtbags.
I would support this. I'm quite in Sinisters Camp at the moment. Yes, I do have 'doxxing' limits but they are far beyond the very High Standards the Pit has so far employed because I realize that when people are allowed to do something to you but you are not allowed a proportional response, they tend to continue to abuse ones kindness. The SJW's and FTB (pretty much one and the same) started this.Brive1987 wrote:.
Doxxing Manifesto
This deals with Doxxing so trigger warning.
First up - I've made it clear that I understand and agree with the Pit rule "we don't doxx". And I've been a prat to Aneris about it and lectured others. All of that stands. Double plus.
I also note that we are fighting an enemy possessing very different values.
Zvan has made it clear that she will doxx anyone she finds sufficiently annoying or ideologically unsound. She will set the bar. And that bar is subject to change.
Benson is like a fucking hyena or vulture waiting for the hard work to be done and then tearing a few strips off.
Peez is an utter Dr Mengle - not only doxxing (ie highlighting private info, publicly available, but not 'open') But also fucking inciting a mob to light torches and stampede the employer.
Skepchick have now adopted the Benson stance.
And not a single precious snowflake of a horder has popped up to say "I inderstand the point, but doxxing and employer rage is off the table" not a single shitty one of them.
Meanwhile we wait for the next hammer-fall like a pathetic Neville. Skeptickle waits for her admin group to summons her in for a joke. And we flail about with petty FB posts, receptionist harrassment and meaningless Twitter alerts.
It's analogous to a battle where one side periodicly fires off banned nerve gas ... because they can.
And they will keep doing this until there is a reason not to. But the best we can do is say "hunker down, we will get back to tanks and bullets soon, carry the infected to the rear"
So how does this get resolved in real life when dealing with fuckwit groups and states?
We say:
"nerve gas is off the table. It's fucked. And you're fucked if you use it. But. But if you do, if you force our hand then there will be shitty un-necessary consequences. Comprend?"
And with any threat you need to be prepared and equipped to carry through.
How could this correspond to the anarchy and bullying from SJL that is so far unchecked?
...........
** I AM NOT PROPOSING I WOULD EVER TAKE UNILATERAL ACTION ** but if we want a proactive group response, and given the fucked up events of the past few days - this is the approach I'd possibly take.
Situation
We are getting our arses handed to us by an enemy prepared to take advantage of our values. They have no incentive to stop.
Mission
To remove doxxing and employer alerts from the table as an acceptable weapon - for both sides. But in a way that doesn't publicly humiliate FtB
Execution
General outline -
we publish a manifesto decrying doxxing, committing to continuing our non-doxxing, but threatening swift proportional response to any future Skep tickle level infringement. We are publicly purposely vague, but we privately make it clear to PZ the specifics of what a response would be.
Detailed tasks -
General consensus agreed here (ok that's optimistic)
Matt word-smiths. Moderators edit and draft is PMed to all(?)
Manifesto is published via social media
Specific doxxing info on an especially loved horder is retained by no more than two moderators
Protocols developed for release - hopefully in theory only.
Limited doxxing info provided privately to PZ as "proof of life" - hopefully he will back channel it.
Timings
ASAP - before this strike is written into history as a victory. And as a clear counter response to the lasted atrocity.
.............
And Gumby, relax, I'm not going to ever tactically doxx. But yes, the info alluded to by others is out there and easily available. I know this for a fact. And it does provide us leverage - to ban the doxx. Or we can wait till next time. As long as it's not me.
As I said. I'm happy to wipe this proposal from the table. But I'll be fucked if I won't at least throw it out there.
She faved a tweet of mine poking the idiots earlier. I think she's ok. There is also a lot of support being shown for her. I don't think there is a person among us who doesn't get all riled up when it comes to skep.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:What separates us from them is critical thinking. I believe we agree that we should NOT be "indolent hand wringers." Brive1987 made an excellent suggestion earlier. If it is unsuitable to the pit, it could be taken elsewhere. But I think an honest discussion about it needs to happen.
I am also a bit concerned that Skeptickle has been absent the pit today. I am hoping that she is not unduly stressed by her doxxing.
I am very much against false flagging.TiBo wrote:No. If you really want someone gone, mass-report him/her for "spam". twitter reacts very quickly on that one.JacquesCuze wrote:I suspect this was the form that was abused to get thunderf00t kicked. So don't abuse the form. Use it to report tweets that dox people.
Lol, smart cat.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:The mom (center, grey tiger) just jumped on my keyboard and typed "Myers is a douchebag". Thankfully, I was able to erase it before it got published.blitzem wrote:
The look very comfortable.
But they are plotting something. I know they are. :o
OK. Two parts of interest to that statement. State laws vary on how long statute of limitations last. If we knew the state where it occurred in we could come up with a reasonable idea if that has expired just by looking at the state laws. The laws on raping minors can have either extended or unlimited statutes of limitations in various states.Old_ones wrote:And releasing his identity accomplishes what, exactly? Unless you are privy to a lot of information I know nothing about, we have no means of establishing the veracity of his story. There is also no way he could be prosecuted even if it were true.d4m10n wrote:Will do, off to bed.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:...Damion could chill a bit and realize he's not exactly doing himself any favors. Either works for me.
You guys have fun protecting the identity of an admitted serial rapist.
Let oggie rot in his anonymity. Maybe I'm a poor judge of character, but this miserable wreck of a human being who spends all of his free time groveling for pity points in the pharyngula lounge thread does not seem like a credible threat to anyone. If you have evidence that I'm wrong about that you should go to the authorities.
Nah, dogs are morons, and like to play with and roll in dead things. I prefer cats, but they are still on the creepy, alien side sometimes.bovarchist wrote: Never trust a man who prefers dogs to cats. Dogs are subservient, cats are partners.
:o :Djet_lagg wrote:https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/5496241664/h3A7D9CFB/blitzem wrote: The look very comfortable.
But they are plotting something. I know they are. :o
https://i.imgur.com/zl8UWdX.jpgApe+lust wrote:...
So, when PZ looks in and sees himself smooching his ever lovin' sugar dumpling, he should remember that the Pit could be having a blast shooping him into porn. It would be easy. Fortunately for him, we're not seething tenured dirtbags.
That's very cool.Apples wrote:I thought Carrie's comments from Nugent's deserved some amplification:
http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/881/2497368294.png
http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/881/7359974913.png
http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/881/9967247299.png
http://www.michaelnugent.com/2014/10/07 ... nt-1067859
Particularly the bit in the 3rd one about Pharyngula and other FTB commenters' being "inward looking" and not really caring about people outside the bunker. Spot on. The unbelievable truth is that the Pit is a much more of a "safe space" than creepshows like skepchick and the 'gulag.
Please report the Skepchick Twitter account to Twitter if you haven't done so already. Twitter refuses to act on third party harassment complaints. However, if you complain, there is a remote possibility the Skepchick account could be suspended or banned. It's not much, but it would send a message that FTB-Skepchick abuse campaigns will have a cost to their PR infrastructures.Skep tickle wrote:Tough day, thanks everyone for moral support & kind words & thoughtful considerations about how to address the big picture situation (a hard nut to crack).
Awesome. If deeply unpleasantly so.Ape+lust wrote:Was anyone else moved by the way Rebecca came slashing at Skep? I didn't see anybody send up the FREE BEER signal. She came unbidden, ready to do or die by her friend. It's like her tender feelings were suddenly revealed in a selfless moment and...
I'm sorry, I can't go on. Love stories always make me weepy.
http://imgur.com/P1JcdvF.jpg
omfg APE!Ape+lust wrote:Was anyone else moved by the way Rebecca came slashing at Skep? I didn't see anybody send up the FREE BEER signal. She came unbidden, ready to do or die by her friend. It's like her tender feelings were suddenly revealed in a selfless moment and...
I'm sorry, I can't go on. Love stories always make me weepy.
http://imgur.com/P1JcdvF.jpg
IIRC there's at least one committed feminist on the Twitter exec board.Really? wrote:How the fuck can Melodramatic Melody and all of the other assorted braindeads on Twitter get people banned for a comment on a hashtag that they don't like?
Social media sites which have a large feminist demographic?James Caruthers wrote:What kind of shithole social media website allows Doxxing?
Well, you had it easy.Tribble wrote:I might of made it half-way through before my eye-rolling gave me a headache. There are hundreds of millions of people who use the Internet. You get trolled.Coprolite wrote:Sorry if this has been posted already, it's a very long sob-story about the pain of being man-trolled and it will make you cough up your bladder. It perpetuates all the SJW victim-myths and is of course being lapped up by the unbearable righteous pricks I follow in my real-life twitter account.
http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point
This month is the 10-year anniversary of my first online threat. I thought it was a one-off, then. Just one angry guy. And it wasn’t really THAT bad. But looking back, it was the canary in the coal mine… the first hint that if I kept on this path, it would not end well. And what was that path? We’ll get to that in a minute.
Later I learned that the first threat had nothing to do with what I actually made or said in my books, blog posts, articles, and conference presentations. The real problem — as my first harasser described — was that others were beginning to pay attention to me. He wrote as if mere exposure to my work was harming his world.
But here’s the key: it turned out he wasn’t outraged about my work. His rage was because, in his mind, my work didn’t deserve the attention. Spoiler alert: “deserve†and “attention†are at the heart.
A year later, I wrote a light-hearted article about “haters†(the quotes matter) and something I called The Koolaid Point. It wasn’t about harassment, abuse, or threats against people but about the kind of brand “trolls†you find in, say, Apple discussion forums. My wildly non-scientific theory was this: the most vocal trolling and “hate†for a brand kicks in HARD once a critical mass of brand fans/users are thought to have “drunk the Koolaidâ€. In other words, the hate wasn’t so much about the product/brand but that other people were falling for it.
I was delighted, a few weeks’ later, to see my little “Koolaid Point†in Wired’s Jargon Watch column.
The me of 2005 had no idea what was coming.
Less than two years later, I’d learn that my festive take on harmless brand trolling also applied to people. And it wasn’t festive. Or harmless. Especially for women.
I now believe the most dangerous time for a woman with online visibility is the point at which others are seen to be listening, “followingâ€, “likingâ€, “favoritingâ€, retweeting. In other words, the point at which her readers have (in the troll’s mind) “drunk the Koolaidâ€. Apparently, that just can’t be allowed.
From the hater’s POV, you (the Koolaid server) do not “deserve†that attention. You are “stealing†an audience. From their angry, frustrated point of view, the idea that others listen to you is insanity. From their emotion-fueled view you don’t have readers you have cult followers. That just can’t be allowed.
You must be stopped. And if they cannot stop you, they can at least ruin your quality of life. A standard goal, in troll culture, I soon learned, is to cause “personal ruinâ€. They aren’t all trolls, though. Some of those who seek to stop and/or ruin you are misguided/misinformed but well-intended. They actually believe in a cause, and they believe you (or rather the Koolaid you’re serving) threatens that cause.
Hell, back when I blogged fairly heavily between 2004 and 2007 I got trolled and I was, pretty much, just a nobody. Even so, I got the same kind of shit. And I'm a dude and I used a dude pseudo-anonomous handle.
And that was NOTHING compared to the trolling and doxing I got at the hands of some Oakland Raider fans. I had a very unflattering 'page of hate' and all my personal ID out there. I had to change my home phone number and my office phone went to caller ID and any number that didn't match a known client number went to voice mail.
And that was just over an innocuous comment.
Shit happens. Welcome to the Internet. Even if 99% of the people are 'nice' you've got that 1% that just shits it up on a regular basis.
I don't think so, I think it more depends on the reporting path. We are taking the Doxxing reporting path but if you just say you find the tweet threatening then you can stretch the truth and say that you find the tweet personally threatening then it will go through. Secondly I think that if enough people block somebody they will be removed from Twitter. Given the amount of tweets I think that this would be largely automated (A new account with few followers would be kicked off before an account with 1000's of followers).Satan wrote:IIRC there's at least one committed feminist on the Twitter exec board.Really? wrote:How the fuck can Melodramatic Melody and all of the other assorted braindeads on Twitter get people banned for a comment on a hashtag that they don't like?
I wouldn't be even slightly surprised if high profile feminists--especially ones with verified accounts--have non-public Twitter support contacts who will ban ordinary accounts no questions asked.
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I will give Damion a break, because I think he's as pissed off about this whole bag of shit as we are.
I've been typing post upon post and have been deleting them all before clicking the submit button, because there's a lot of shit I could say in anger. And a not-small part of it is about people noticing my underwear on that cat pic and yet not complimenting me on my massive bulge.
That's cold!
Surgeon -4 hours.
Four Yorkshiremen?Snapfingers wrote:
Well, you had it easy.
I had two pages of hate, and I had to change my phonenumber twice and I had to move my family for three months to a paper bag in a septic tank. We used to have to get up at six in the morning, clean the paper bag, eat a crust of stale bread, go to work down t' mill, fourteen hours a day, week-in week-out, for sixpence a week, and when we got home our Dad would thrash us to sleep with his belt. But if you tell bloggers about that today they won't believe you.
Why engage with him? He's really just another Myers type. Full of shit and way too much ego hidden behind Internet Tough Guy.sinister wrote: It's funny isn't it, when one of the only people on the Pit who would vouch for Damion is attacked, he comes around to be a fucking idiot for attention. You are just a gem aren't you?
d4m10n wrote:Will do, off to bed.CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:...Damion could chill a bit and realize he's not exactly doing himself any favors. Either works for me.
You guys have fun protecting the identity of an admitted serial rapist.
I watched all the Armstrong & Miller scenes on YouTube. We don't get quality comedy like that in the States. If we did, I might actually subscribe to TV again.paddybrown wrote:Which of course leads to this:
[youtube]G2kD1YUtA5o[/youtube]