Karmakin wrote:[quote="katamari Damassi"
FFS Mykeru. Don't start the "fine tuning" argument again.
Joking aside, I'd like to point out that despite being recommended by Malady, these tweets appear to be directed at feminists. I've seen this before. She's being harangued by feminists because she's sexually submissive. I got into it once on Pandagon years ago. I very upset woman posted a comment confessing to enjoying being sub in BDSM and wanted help changing so she could be more feminist. It looked a lot like what I've seen with religious gays who wanted to change. While the feminists at Pandagon expressed sympathy towards her, she was told that she was damaged, the way she has sex abets patriarchy, she needed to change to be a true feminist. Having grown up hearing "the way you sex is wrong", I was the only guy on there(that I can remember)telling her that she was ok, and to accept who she was.
Anyway, that's what I see when I read Buttplug"s tweets.[/quote]
Yeah that's how I read them as well.
So when did the whole trope of some power-projecting people enjoying sex where they didn't have to project that power go away? Because that was always a thing, right?
Actually I'll just answer the question. One of the common things among the SJW crowd is that your individual likes/choices all reflect larger political ideologies and that they should all line up relatively perfect. The personal is the political and all that. That's where the opposition to that particular thing comes from.[/quote]
I think there is a lot of sexual ignorance with SJW's as well, perhaps due to being brought up strictly religious in many cases or simply prudish (Zvan/Benson) The subs I have known tended to be strong and successful women. Also, the subs control the relationship a lot more than the Dom does. So the power is not where they think it is. It is a complex area of sexuality and their attempts to simplify and blame it all on Men is pathetic, especially as it is just as popular in lesbian and gay relationships.