Well, troons, anyway.AnonymousCowherd wrote:They're all just poltoons to me.Verklagekasper wrote:Dang , Google translator came up with that :-/dog puke wrote: Are you sure he's a toady? Sounds more like a lickspittle to me, but each to their own. :whistle:
Add this bizarre account to the listGuest wrote:All the twitter account here, except RW and Sahsha Pixlee, exist only since the 13 of August, most have stopped the 14 and all have twitted only about #solidarityisforwhitewomen. I call a fake.
I would think that being an epic fuckwit would cancel out most of that privilege.didymos wrote:LOL.
Yes, that's all the first page of Google gave me too.bovarchist wrote:What do you have against the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency?16bitheretic wrote:
I wonder how frustrating it must have been for out TWRA visitors. They come to a forum that's got a reputation for ridiculing the excesses of ideology from the likes of Skepchick/A+/FTB and they discover that we thought the TWRAs were just as batshit as anything coming from the A+Theism crowd. Must have been quite the disappointment...
Hail Mary, full of grace.didymos wrote:LOL.
Meanwhile, Rebecca Watson links a [business] address of one of her critics to prove a point. What a fucking hypocrite...but we knew that already.curriejean wrote:With that in mind, let's shift our focus to an ad-hom. Right Rebecca? We couldn't have you focusing on the merit of the claims themselves. That would be indecent.Watson wrote: People are often chiding me for making fun of my “haters†as semi-literate degenerates who harass me because they hate women and want to be free to insult, molest, and rape them as they please. I’m told that I’m wrong, and that these people are actually unbiased and egalitarian critics with valid complaints that I need to address seriously. With that in mind, let’s get to know Cecil Fuson, a critic who has risen to prominence via his highly successful anti-me Facebook page, possibly inspired by the “Fire Rebecca from the SGU†petition he signed a few months ago.
What a shocker.Watson wrote: A few days after I Tweeted the link to the Facebook page, I received an email from someone who explained that they had discovered that Cecil Fuson is a registered sex offender who was convicted and went to prison for “indecent liberties with a child.â€
RW'S to-do list:
- Find one critic with an apparent scandalous criminal history
- Implicitly associate criticism with scandalous criminal activity
- Send 'thank you' flowers to David Miscavige for the strategic thinking tips
http://skepchick.org/2013/08/getting-to ... -offender/
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1glz ... o1_400.jpgApe+lust wrote:Whoo. Sasha Pixlee, who wrote how DJ Grothe triggered all his triggers, has internalized the Good Ally dictum about taking your lumps when an Oppressed Person craps on your head.
http://i.imgur.com/lliM6dy.png
Shut up stalker, I mean male nonperson.justinvacula wrote:
Meanwhile, Rebecca Watson links a [business] address of one of her critics to prove a point. What a fucking hypocrite...but we knew that already.
AnonymousCowherd wrote:They're all just poltoons to me.Verklagekasper wrote:Dang , Google translator came up with that :-/dog puke wrote: Are you sure he's a toady? Sounds more like a lickspittle to me, but each to their own. :whistle:
Is your edit button not working? I'd complain to the Admin if I were you.Well, troons, anyway.
Shit fuck bugger bitch blast damn!
Oh dear lord please :pray: Has this been going on a while or are non-white radfems just starting to turn on the white neo fems?didymos wrote:From the makers of Sociological Racism....
I can just hear Becky pause at the end there and then finish with "And...LOVING IT!"curriejean wrote:Hail Mary, full of grace.didymos wrote:LOL.
Our Lord is with thee.
Etcetera.
Kinda ironic, coming from someone who considers bodyshots foreplay.yomomma wrote:Doesn't Rebecca Watson say that if you're drunk, never mind blacking out, but if you are drunk, it doesn't matter whether you think you've given consent or not, that is still rape.
[tweet][/tweet]
"Schwartzman" eh?Guest wrote:Add this bizarre account to the list
I've had the same problem. When someone is drunk, they're going to be a damn fool and there is little you can do to 'reason' with them. That's why you always get their car keys before the party.Mykeru wrote:Might just be me, but I notice a marked difficulty in getting a drunk person to do anything they don't want to do.halophilic wrote: Has anyone been in a state where they wanted to say no but were compelled to say yes? (not just to sex, but to anything) I'm trying to wrap my head around the common "inability to give consent" phrase that's tossed around.
The edit button works just fine. It's the damn editor button that is broken. I blame iPads.real horrorshow wrote:
Is your edit button not working? I'd complain to the Admin if I were you.
I was thinking 'retard,' but that works too...VickyCaramel wrote:I would think that being an epic fuckwit would cancel out most of that privilege.didymos wrote:LOL.
Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away.Guest wrote:It happened to me once few years ago. I did not even drank so much but I have several minutes (or dozen of minutes) of my life I can't remember although I was still functional (well I was drunk). I can really imagine people having that thinking they drinks were spiked, and if they had sex, that it was rape.Mykeru wrote:The problem is that people, stupid people, perhaps even stupid drunk people, confuse "black out drunk" with being "passed out drunk".JackRayner wrote: So, blacking out doesn't necessarily mean that person was trashed, incapacitated, or whatever else people may assert.
[youtube]1Y3FzVQi-R8[/youtube]Tribble wrote:I was thinking 'retard,' but that works too...VickyCaramel wrote:I would think that being an epic fuckwit would cancel out most of that privilege.didymos wrote:LOL.
Fellow USAFag reporting in, when did you get out and what was your AFSC?welch wrote:Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away.
I was there. (The answer to Ken Ham's favorite question.) The American Girlyban False Accusation Society was just starting to stretch their legs back then. Wonder how I felt about them going after Lawrence Krauss? Of course not, but for those shut-ins and Elevatorgate, here's the blast from the past:jjbinx007 wrote:Incidentally, I just came across these articles from a couple of years back after Watson tried to do a hatchet job on Krauss, and when PZ yet again came to her aide:
http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=30198
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... ssolution/
http://www.skepticismandethics.com/2011 ... yells.html
Another August 13th account. Fake. The trolls make this far less interesting.real horrorshow wrote:"Schwartzman" eh?Guest wrote:Add this bizarre account to the list
http://i.imgur.com/t3xiTVi.jpg
Nah, can't be a Poe!
and yet they get so angry when you associate Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot with atheism.Badger3k wrote:And, who do you think would repost the whole thing, thereby continuing the guilt by association?Gumby wrote:And reading the whole thing, she clearly plays the guilt by association game by not so subtly lumping the sex offender in with all her other critics. Same game, different day.curriejean wrote:
To be fair, not that it's deserved, she does go on about her independent verifications. And then ... full stop. I've shown my critic is a sex offender. There is nothing else to say. Except for a boast about knowingly sharing the information against his wishes.
I'll give you three guesses, but if the initials aren't P and Z, then you picked the wrong white knight. I expect Stefunny and Toiletbowl to get in on the act as well. I wonder when they'll connect this guy with Krauss and Shermer, and us here. I mean, in direct, overt fashion. Toiletbowl is probably the most clueless since he still refers to Shermer as a well-evidenced rapist, so my money's on him.
Again another August 13th account. I think we can easily identify who the trolls are.real horrorshow wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Z8SrpeO.jpg
Fucking hell! My Poe-Detector is now in flames!
98.4 percent of all homeless white guys are ex military. They're either aging Nam Vets who never made it back from Da Nang, or shell shocked, brain damaged mideast vets fed a steady diet of rightwing tripe and torture training. You're a little harsh on the liberal arts folks. They are dedicated to statistical modeling and data integrity. That's not what is on display within the heavily fortified internet silo environment of #atheismplus. They're just makin' shit up as they go along. Attempting to create memes out of unicorn farts.Cold wrote:Is anyone kind of stumped by the whole idea of privilege? I get it as a sociological concept, but it has almost zero application. How is it measured or observed?
It fails to take into account the individual. What if I'm a white person in a country that hates white people? Am I still privileged then? What if I'm a woman who was hired on the basis of being a woman? It seems like these people are too caught up in a group mentality and don't realize that in reality nobody gives a shit about themselves. There's no Big Bad pulling the strings behind the scenes to purposely fuck minorities / oppressed people over; we're a bunch of individuals and we all act on our individual biases and preferences.
If I'm an employer and I want to populate my office with pretty women, do those women exhibit female privilege in this case? What if I only want to hire black people? Do they have black privilege?
This kind of shit is why I stuck to STEM. Liberal arts are rife with this kind of stuff.
http://i.imgur.com/z4p2mhU.jpg?1
Here's what you need.Cold wrote:Is anyone kind of stumped by the whole idea of privilege? I get it as a sociological concept, but it has almost zero application. How is it measured or observed?
It fails to take into account the individual. What if I'm a white person in a country that hates white people? Am I still privileged then? What if I'm a woman who was hired on the basis of being a woman? It seems like these people are too caught up in a group mentality and don't realize that in reality nobody gives a shit about themselves. There's no Big Bad pulling the strings behind the scenes to purposely fuck minorities / oppressed people over; we're a bunch of individuals and we all act on our individual biases and preferences.
If I'm an employer and I want to populate my office with pretty women, do those women exhibit female privilege in this case? What if I only want to hire black people? Do they have black privilege?
This kind of shit is why I stuck to STEM. Liberal arts are rife with this kind of stuff.
Just a further manifestation of this crap from the AtheismPlus “Glossary†[aka Catechism]:real horrorshow wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Z8SrpeO.jpg
Fucking hell! My Poe-Detector is now in flames!
Rather amusing though to see a black woman turn a meme or trope against some of the creators of them.In social justice terms, marginalized groups cannot be guilty of -isms [e.g., racism, sexism, ableism, etc.] in regards to the axes of privilege that they fall low on, because they don't have the power to institutionalize their prejudices.
Racism - discrimination or social prejudice against People of Color.
Sexism - discrimination or social prejudice against women.
Unfortunately, the continued existence of religions like Christianity tend to dispel my optimism that the FtB-style SJW movement will "crash and burn when its ridiculous and contradictory premises become manifestly obvious."Steersman wrote: But I think the whole scene is an example of a movement that crashes and burns when its ridiculous and contradictory premises become manifestly obvious.
http://thetimchannel.wordpress.com/2013 ... matic-360/*This device has the ability to sniff out hidden females better than “good ole Blood†in A Boy and His Dog, although there’s no guarantee your denouement will be as joyful as the one in this movie. IOW, Dog not included.
You know what's odd about that test? A scientist is considered less privileged than an unemployed person.real horrorshow wrote:
Here's what you need.
Now, the higher you score, the more trouble you're in. If you're coming in >100, like Sasha Pixlee back there, then basically, anything bad in the history of the world is your fault.
Your only hope of salvation and a place in the SJW Paradise, is to find the people with the lowest possible score, get down on your knees, put your tongue up their arse and suck and slurp from now 'til Doomsday. Okay?
Boo, I am disappoint. I had this shot in the locker.deLurch wrote:Again another August 13th account. I think we can easily identify who the trolls are.real horrorshow wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Z8SrpeO.jpg
Fucking hell! My Poe-Detector is now in flames!
But Watson has self-identified as a skeptic for ages. She's already made the grade. She and her friends too busy educating the new skeptics who don't understand skepticism yet -- they don't have time to follow every little reasoning rule to the letter themselves. Shortcuts must be made for the greater good. You'll understand some day. Hush now. Don't worry your sweet little dudebro head over it.Kevin Solway wrote:Rebecca Watson writes:
"I've shown my critic is a sex offender."
Hasn't anyone ever explained to Watson what a logical fallacy is?
Even if the fellow was once a sex offender, or a murderer, or a bank robber, or whatever, it doesn't mean he can't ever speak the truth.
I can just imagine Dawkins summing up his argument at the next Oxford debate, "I've shown my critic is a sex offender."
"Stop trying to co-opt my black anger!"Cold wrote:http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1glz ... o1_400.jpgApe+lust wrote:Whoo. Sasha Pixlee, who wrote how DJ Grothe triggered all his triggers, has internalized the Good Ally dictum about taking your lumps when an Oppressed Person craps on your head.
http://i.imgur.com/lliM6dy.png
'93, 45773C, Defensive Avionics on B-1BsCold wrote:Fellow USAFag reporting in, when did you get out and what was your AFSC?welch wrote:Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away.
It's not even a logical fallacy level stupid. It's little kid shit.Kevin Solway wrote:Rebecca Watson writes:
"I've shown my critic is a sex offender."
Hasn't anyone ever explained to Watson what a logical fallacy is?
Even if the fellow was once a sex offender, or a murderer, or a bank robber, or whatever, it doesn't mean he can't ever speak the truth.
I can just imagine Dawkins summing up his argument at the next Oxford debate, "I've shown my critic is a sex offender."
Florida is an aberration. You can't judge anything by Florida except Florida, and even then probably not.Kevin Solway wrote:Rebecca Watson writes:
"I'm white, able-bodied, straight, American, cisgendered, and middle class. Incredibly privileged."
I don't think I've ever met an artist, which would include thinking people, who would regard those things as "privilege".
I've visited Florida, and I've also been into a Walmart. No insult to Americans, but this is not privilege.
I think I'm getting the hand of this now, but...real horrorshow wrote:Boo, I am disappoint. I had this shot in the locker.deLurch wrote:Again another August 13th account. I think we can easily identify who the trolls are.real horrorshow wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Z8SrpeO.jpg
Fucking hell! My Poe-Detector is now in flames!
http://i.imgur.com/R62hgzB.jpg
(How much of Twittle-Twatter is this mad shit and how much of that is fake?)
Fuck you, Gookima!The Tim Channel wrote:98.4 percent of all homeless white guys are ex military. They're either aging Nam Vets who never made it back from Da Nang, or shell shocked, brain damaged mideast vets fed a steady diet of rightwing tripe and torture training.
Enjoy.
Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts for the times I actually bought into the SJW narrative:PFuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away
I believe there is a line, and I am first. You can't rape me, no matter what you do. I TRIPLE DOG DARE YOU TO TRYVickyCaramel wrote:I think I'm getting the hand of this now, but...real horrorshow wrote:Boo, I am disappoint. I had this shot in the locker.deLurch wrote: Again another August 13th account. I think we can easily identify who the trolls are.
http://i.imgur.com/R62hgzB.jpg
(How much of Twittle-Twatter is this mad shit and how much of that is fake?)
I'm ginger. Who am I allowed to "can't rape"?
Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts for the time I destroyed an entire Indian village.another lurker wrote:welch wrote:
Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts for the times I actually bought into the SJW narrative:PFuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away
I can't believe they still have B-1s around in the active. Those things are ancient as shit, and they're always breaking.welch wrote:'93, 45773C, Defensive Avionics on B-1BsCold wrote:Fellow USAFag reporting in, when did you get out and what was your AFSC?welch wrote:Fuck, I wish I could claim blackouts. Make some of the stupid shit I did in college and the USAF go away.
True. Although I think that those religions have an extra "hook" into people with their promises, their visions, of personal immortality. And even Marxism with its broad view of history offered some vision which obviously engaged many people. Which, arguably, fell apart when it became clear that its premises didn't correspond all that well to reality. But "social justice warriors" and "Gnu atheists"? Largely pikers, I think, full of "passionate intensity", at least - they wouldn't recognize a vision, utopian or dystopian, if they fell over it.Gumby wrote:Unfortunately, the continued existence of religions like Christianity tend to dispel my optimism that the FtB-style SJW movement will "crash and burn when its ridiculous and contradictory premises become manifestly obvious."Steersman wrote: But I think the whole scene is an example of a movement that crashes and burns when its ridiculous and contradictory premises become manifestly obvious.
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=351&p=119568#p119568Cold wrote:Is anyone kind of stumped by the whole idea of privilege? I get it as a sociological concept, but it has almost zero application. How is it measured or observed?
Social Sciences are part of STEM.Cold wrote:This kind of shit is why I stuck to STEM. Liberal arts are rife with this kind of stuff.
welch wrote:
I believe there is a line, and I am first. You can't rape me, no matter what you do. I TRIPLE DOG DARE YOU TO TRY
Am I the only one who suspects Mrs. Z is Jesse's mommy? That Jesse is thirty- something and lives with mommy, and is still saving his first kiss for the right girl?another lurker wrote:
I still get a laugh out of Jesse's immense logic fail.
... 'real men' such as Jesse need the force of government to keep women in monogamous relationships with 'real men' like himself.... Because that's all that matters here - that losers like Jesse get their purity balls and their subservient women...It's all about Jesse and his fantasies.
Um, no. The 'S' stands for the hard sciences.VAXherd wrote: Social Sciences are part of STEM.
Indeed.Cold wrote:Is anyone kind of stumped by the whole idea of privilege? I get it as a sociological concept, but it has almost zero application. How is it measured or observed?
It fails to take into account the individual. ....
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/4032/iij2.pngTony Parsehole wrote:With a Twitter name like "Sasha Pixlee" was there ever any doubt of his cunt credentials?real horrorshow wrote:From which we learn that Sasha Pixlee is a cunt - and even the people he wants to be friends with think so.Sulman wrote:For God's sake man, have some backbone.
It is utterly awful to see someone willingly subjugate themselves to clear and obvious bullying.
I'd never heard of him. After googling his name I found this:
http://goodmenproject.com/author/sasha-pixlee/
Which includes this header:And this drawing which I assume is supposed to be him:Sasha was born in the office of a homeopath/chiropractor and was raised Mormon (the second Whitest religion in the world, after Scientology). He reasoned his way out of his intellectually disadvantaged upbringing and has become passionate about feminism, LGBT equality and anti-racism as a reaction against the culture in which he was raised. He likes justice, American whiskies, British gins, and hiding in his west coast liberal fantasyland.
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/cbebc6f7db ... =blank&r=R
When In fact he looks like this:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-L33F ... /photo.jpg
His pen must have ran out before he got to the other 6 chins.
:popcorn:real horrorshow wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Z8SrpeO.jpg
Fucking hell! My Poe-Detector is now in flames!
Finally, someone who acknowledges their Socratic privilege.Kevin Solway wrote:Speaking of privilege, Plato once wrote:
"I thank God that I was born Greek and not a barbarian, a freeman and not a slave, a man and not a woman; but above all, that I was born in the age of Socrates."
