FUCK.bovarchist wrote:Took a while to work out how to put her behind an obstacle, but I finally got it. Be kind. :)
ME.
Is that Jay Leno on the right? Look at his fucking chin and nose! He looks like the moon in it's crescent form.
FUCK.bovarchist wrote:Took a while to work out how to put her behind an obstacle, but I finally got it. Be kind. :)
Whoa, very meta. Wait... did she... Catherine Keener... IIIIICK!Tigzy wrote:Gratuitous writing here, as apparently this message contains too few characters - despite the fact that it isn't just Zvan in the pic.
[youtube]W4SBW5MOEpg[/youtube]Ape+lust wrote:Poor Conan, never saw the dump truck that hit him :lol:bovarchist wrote:Took a while to work out how to put her behind an obstacle, but I finally got it. Be kind. :)
He's a very, very dark soul and his running commentary on Pharyngula shines a light on his true character. I wouldn't be surprised if "The Redhead" was a hitchhiker he abducted in the 1970's.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
:lol: :lol:Tony Parsehole wrote:He's a very, very dark soul and his running commentary on Pharyngula shines a light on his true character. I wouldn't be surprised if "The Redhead" was a hitchhiker he abducted in the 1970's.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
As wrong as polluting Rick Griffin with Zvan :lol:BarnOwl wrote:Those Zvan faces on Grand Funk Railroad = so wrong! :lol:
http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 5b7a52.png
:shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Tony Parsehole wrote:He's a very, very dark soul and his running commentary on Pharyngula shines a light on his true character. I wouldn't be surprised if "The Redhead" was a hitchhiker he abducted in the 1970's.
http://i.imgur.com/hUfZn0v.jpgConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
FUCKING BIG LOLS EMANATING FROM REDMOND RIGHT NOW!!!!Jan Steen wrote:http://i.imgur.com/hUfZn0v.jpgConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
I think we're all being insensitive. Traffic is one of the many things that can cause PTSD, like looking at your Twitter feed, reading facts that contradict your opinions and allowing comments on your YouTube videos and pooped-out "articles" for the blogs of national magazines.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
http://i.imgur.com/LebUk1B.jpgTony Parsehole wrote:He's a very, very dark soul and his running commentary on Pharyngula shines a light on his true character. I wouldn't be surprised if "The Redhead" was a hitchhiker he abducted in the 1970's.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: http://i.imgur.com/0BY7Ak3.png
Because sometimes while you can have a basic premise that's very correct, your exposition and reasoning could be hilariously wrong, as it was the case with the lad PZ was mocking mercilessly.Service Dog wrote:I don't understand PZ's disdain for the chart's basic conclusion: that our society values women for being young and pretty, and doesn't hold men to the same standard-- allowing old, ugly men to buy desirability with money and power; thus women face a social "expiration date". How is that different from PZ's feminist beliefs?
Okay, if PZ get's something right, he has to get the next thing very very wrong.PZ also cites individual opinions as contrary to the chart. PZ seems to think that, if one man considers Scarlett Johannson unattractive, that single data-point invalidates the chart's finding that most men consider her attractive.
First of all, that doesn't make the argument correct. Second of all, no, it can''t be applied. At this particular instance, PZ was right. The methodology was hilarious. Seriously, the weight the guy assigns to age is a factor of ten larger than 90% of other weights he considers in his survey. Of course, the result is going to confirm his hypothesis. It's so ridiculous and lolzy that if his comments were open I would be trolling there.I understand that the methodology used to construct the SMV chart may be specious. But it seems to me that PZ's stated objections to the methodology would also apply to vast swaths of social sciences.
Dimensionless is not equivalent to "arbitrary cut off points". I've not looked at Arora's map in detail but if it's not based on statistics such as "rape per capita" then it's also bullshit and I'll be very surprised and disappointed in Aronra if that was the case. Nonetheless, that is very different than some dude assigning some random numerical value to highly subjective traits.PZ also complains that the vertical axis on the SMV chart, is "dimensionless", arbitrarily broken into 10 units. How is that different from the 5 unit color scale on the rape map. Why 5? How were the cut-off points between the colors determined?
PZ wrote: On economic issues, atheists as a whole ought to be behind reducing the rich-poor divide — it’s the only rational position to take ...
You were one of those "leaders" PZ. Until you blew it up with the kind of stupid reasoning shown in this blog post of yours. You don't get to complain.PZ wrote:Atheism is ultimately going to have to be a progressive political force, fighting for inclusion, evidence-based policy, humanist values, and the goal of expanding knowledge and power for all. We’re hampered right now by a rather reluctant leadership that tends to focus on pettier issues in the name of unity.
AMAZING! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Jan Steen wrote:http://i.imgur.com/hUfZn0v.jpgConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:I love this!
Nerd shows his true side. I bet that fucker beats the shit out of his wife if his potatoes are underdone.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-711229
Spot on.Lsuoma wrote:Lol: http://www.buzzfeed.com/tomphillips/the ... itterstorm
He's only half a step from recognizing how unpopular and hated he and his fans are by the larger atheist community, and responding by saying something like "we need a Big Tent approach here in atheism." Despite Carrier, Zvan, PZ and everyone else deliberately reacting against the "big tenters" in atheism with their "don't you call yourself my ally, you fascist fuck!"Trophy wrote:We all knew it but finally PZ decided to admit it as well.
PZ wrote: On economic issues, atheists as a whole ought to be behind reducing the rich-poor divide — it’s the only rational position to take ...You were one of those "leaders" PZ. Until you blew it up with the kind of stupid reasoning shown in this blog post of yours. You don't get to complain.PZ wrote:Atheism is ultimately going to have to be a progressive political force, fighting for inclusion, evidence-based policy, humanist values, and the goal of expanding knowledge and power for all. We’re hampered right now by a rather reluctant leadership that tends to focus on pettier issues in the name of unity.
In the UK student unions are campaigning against the evil of lads mags. Good to see them getting their priorities right - there couldn't possibly be more important issues to tackle, could there?Although really, I've noticed the focus on petty non-issues is common in any area that SJW feminism has infected. Student union tries to fight to freeze tuition and give university staff a living wage -> SJW feminists show up -> tell union leaders the union needs to focus on teaching men not to rape.
This is why I find almost everything SJW feminists say impossible to believe. Feminism today has a strong link with post-modernism. Most feminists I meet who are radical will outright tell me this, and that they believe there is no "truth" and anyone's truth is as good as anyone else's.Service Dog wrote:http://i.imgur.com/NZbTr6i.png
I had a little time and I was inspired. Sorry for shitty skills.Ape+lust wrote:bovarchist wrote:Where can I find the original Zvan image?
I'll be here live in between periods of the hockey game, then I'm going to grab a bite to eat and go read a book in bed.justinvacula wrote:I'll be live on National Progressive Talk Radio in 30 minutes! Tune in, consider calling, and join the chat which should soon be available.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/national-p ... sm-nptr-50
Ummmm .... nope, reducing the rich-poor divide is not the only rational position to take.Trophy wrote:We all knew it but finally PZ decided to admit it as well.
PZ wrote: On economic issues, atheists as a whole ought to be behind reducing the rich-poor divide — it’s the only rational position to take ...
I guess he was talking about this unhinged asshole:If we are going to claim to have positions based on reason and the intelligent interpretation of the evidence, then the climate change denialists, the sexists, the racists, the narcissistic worshippers of the Holy Market…they cannot be regarded as representative. The ones who think the solution to Islamic theocracy is to bomb Muslim countries or deport brown people should be considered as lunatic and beyond the pale as atheists who advocate nuking the Vatican or ostracizing Catholics.
Jebus, what blithering tripe, what pious inanities. This is only the latest atrocity. Fuck the Catholic church. Empty every pew, loot every coffer, disband every level of the hierarchy, take all their property and turn it over to secular authorities to be managed ethically and rationally.
And if you’re still attending church…what the hell is wrong with you?
Nice one.Cliché Guevara wrote:Peezus said this today:
I guess he was talking about this unhinged asshole:If we are going to claim to have positions based on reason and the intelligent interpretation of the evidence, then the climate change denialists, the sexists, the racists, the narcissistic worshippers of the Holy Market…they cannot be regarded as representative. The ones who think the solution to Islamic theocracy is to bomb Muslim countries or deport brown people should be considered as lunatic and beyond the pale as atheists who advocate nuking the Vatican or ostracizing Catholics.
Jebus, what blithering tripe, what pious inanities. This is only the latest atrocity. Fuck the Catholic church. Empty every pew, loot every coffer, disband every level of the hierarchy, take all their property and turn it over to secular authorities to be managed ethically and rationally.
And if you’re still attending church…what the hell is wrong with you?
Still catching up on the weekend traffic, but I agree. Excellent work and very informative.Aneris wrote:Mythbusting Service Dog, that was very excellent indeed. Thank you :)
Wasn't that what happened with the Occupy movement? People were protesting against corruption on Wall Street, and SJW morons came in and shat it up with Progressive Stacks and whining about Smashing Patriarchy and other nonsense?James Caruthers wrote:He's only half a step from recognizing how unpopular and hated he and his fans are by the larger atheist community, and responding by saying something like "we need a Big Tent approach here in atheism." Despite Carrier, Zvan, PZ and everyone else deliberately reacting against the "big tenters" in atheism with their "don't you call yourself my ally, you fascist fuck!"Trophy wrote:We all knew it but finally PZ decided to admit it as well.
PZ wrote: On economic issues, atheists as a whole ought to be behind reducing the rich-poor divide — it’s the only rational position to take ...You were one of those "leaders" PZ. Until you blew it up with the kind of stupid reasoning shown in this blog post of yours. You don't get to complain.PZ wrote:Atheism is ultimately going to have to be a progressive political force, fighting for inclusion, evidence-based policy, humanist values, and the goal of expanding knowledge and power for all. We’re hampered right now by a rather reluctant leadership that tends to focus on pettier issues in the name of unity.
In other words, all of PZs political and ideological positions are motivated entirely by self-interest. PZ doesn't seem to understand that he's a poisonous little turd, and so any movement he joins is going to end up focusing on petty bullshit as long as PZ is given a podium to spew from.
Although really, I've noticed the focus on petty non-issues is common in any area that SJW feminism has infected. Student union tries to fight to freeze tuition and give university staff a living wage -> SJW feminists show up -> tell union leaders the union needs to focus on teaching men not to rape. :doh:
And now I sit back and wait for someone to quote me and say I'm claiming rape is a trivial non-issue. Go on, I dare you, I double dare you muthafucka!
Sexism: solved.Aneris wrote:Richard Dawkins delievers as usual. Anyway worth posting, but there is a small nugget on the atheist community and … sexism.
Skip to 32:00 …
[youtube]EWGAg9iGPLQ[/youtube]
The silly thing is that even if it was 'prejudice + power' - it still wouldn't follow that because there isn't much power that therefore there's no racism. Suppose prejudice has an arbitrary value of 10. Let power be 0. Prejudice + power = 10. A non-zero amount of racism. So even if 'privilege + power' was right, it wouldn't mean that the oppressed can't be racist.Jan Steen wrote:Yemisi is not only the author of hilariously atrocious ‘poetry’, she is also a dogmatic Social Justice Warrior. One of the SJW dogmas is that People of Colour (PoC) cannot be racist and that women cannot be sexist (this sounds like two dogmas but it’s really only one).
However, Yemisi goes on to say:Racism just like sexism is prejudice + Power which make it impossible for a race or gender to perpetrate against their race or gender. Contrary to what the female commenter said above, women cannot be sexist towards men or other women. Yes, women can be hostile or practice learned sexism towards other women, just like the ignorant couple I mentioned in my status update perpetrated discrimination against their own race but this cannot qualify as sexism or racism against their kind.
Racism cannot be a substituted word for prejudice, unfair treatment or discrimination. Same goes for sexism. Institutionalized Racism, Systemic Racism, and Institutional/Systemic Sexism all have something in common and that is prejudice, privilege + power.
Tune in next week to Social Justice Math TV when we'll be using some crayons to graph the Nth roots of Patriarchy.Polterguest wrote:The silly thing is that even if it was 'prejudice + power' - it still wouldn't follow that because there isn't much power that therefore there's no racism. Suppose prejudice has an arbitrary value of 10. Let power be 0. Prejudice + power = 10. A non-zero amount of racism. So even if 'privilege + power' was right, it wouldn't mean that the oppressed can't be racist.
When SJ warriors write about 'Prejudice + power' the plus-sign is not to be taken literally. They mean that in their view racism is a two dimensional quantity. In the absence of power there can be no racism, no matter how insane the level of prejudice. They're playing a semantics game.Polterguest wrote:The silly thing is that even if it was 'prejudice + power' - it still wouldn't follow that because there isn't much power that therefore there's no racism. Suppose prejudice has an arbitrary value of 10. Let power be 0. Prejudice + power = 10. A non-zero amount of racism. So even if 'privilege + power' was right, it wouldn't mean that the oppressed can't be racist.Jan Steen wrote:Yemisi is not only the author of hilariously atrocious ‘poetry’, she is also a dogmatic Social Justice Warrior. One of the SJW dogmas is that People of Colour (PoC) cannot be racist and that women cannot be sexist (this sounds like two dogmas but it’s really only one).
However, Yemisi goes on to say:Racism just like sexism is prejudice + Power which make it impossible for a race or gender to perpetrate against their race or gender. Contrary to what the female commenter said above, women cannot be sexist towards men or other women. Yes, women can be hostile or practice learned sexism towards other women, just like the ignorant couple I mentioned in my status update perpetrated discrimination against their own race but this cannot qualify as sexism or racism against their kind.
Racism cannot be a substituted word for prejudice, unfair treatment or discrimination. Same goes for sexism. Institutionalized Racism, Systemic Racism, and Institutional/Systemic Sexism all have something in common and that is prejudice, privilege + power.
It's almost as if he's too fucking dumb to realize that a majority of Catholics are "brown people" too.Cliché Guevara wrote:Peezus said this today:
I guess he was talking about this unhinged asshole:If we are going to claim to have positions based on reason and the intelligent interpretation of the evidence, then the climate change denialists, the sexists, the racists, the narcissistic worshippers of the Holy Market…they cannot be regarded as representative. The ones who think the solution to Islamic theocracy is to bomb Muslim countries or deport brown people should be considered as lunatic and beyond the pale as atheists who advocate nuking the Vatican or ostracizing Catholics.
Jebus, what blithering tripe, what pious inanities. This is only the latest atrocity. Fuck the Catholic church. Empty every pew, loot every coffer, disband every level of the hierarchy, take all their property and turn it over to secular authorities to be managed ethically and rationally.
And if you’re still attending church…what the hell is wrong with you?
Conference hopping armchair feminist PZ Myers blogged a little eulogy for aboriginal warholite Lou Reed: http://www.freezepage.com/1382942049VDBBUIHZEZJudith Butler is no radical: She is one of the smoothest careerists and veteran conference hoppers in the entire American academic system. She shrewdly adapted to the prevailing chic orthodoxy and became a major player in the ruthless academic marketplace... while the aboriginal Warholites remain ostracized.
There is a problem existing within the atheist community when people who are "famous on the internet", like Watson or AronRa, or indeed the Atheist Experience bunch, are treated with disproportionate respect. AronRA is internet famous for a serious of videos he made that tackle creationism and in particular creationist arguments regarding biology.James Caruthers wrote:The main thing that Justicar video really demonstrates is Aron is a fucking moron when it comes to feminism.
Hey, we're all ignorant and stupid on some issue. But I mean, damn, those audio clips make him sound like a fundamentalist preacher riling up his flock. Arguing dictionary definitions of "feminism" to make it look like anyone who disagrees with feminism for any reason is by definition a sexist. Meanwhile he gets pissed off when creationists argue that evolution is "just a theory" and therefore creationism is by definition "just an alternate theory."
Fucking irony, how does it work?
I doubt that we bring them that much in terms of page views - at least not Pharyngula and Butterflies and Wheels, they will still be getting a lot of views without our clicks.Trophy wrote:I just watched the latest tfoot video and I found it quite interesting. But his points on the FTB page views made me wonder: how much of the FTB page views is due to us slymers scouring the place for lolz? I wouldn't be surprised if that's a lot.
Wow. Good on her for trying to set the record straight.Apples wrote:Amazing story from Mother Jones reporter Stephanie Mencimer about Jamie Leigh Jones. She takes responsibility for doing some credulous reporting on the case before really digging into it herself. Justicar appears in the comments.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazi ... p?page=all
:doh:From the trailer, Jones called her father, Tom Jones, in Houston, where it was still the middle of the night. He later called Jones’s office looking for her boss and by coincidence got Tumbarella on the phone. He told her his daughter had been gang-raped. Tumbarella was shocked. “I had just got an email from her saying, ‘I had a great night last night, let’s do it again.’ Next thing I know her father’s calling saying she’s been gang-raped,†she told me in an interview.
Tits?Tony Parsehole wrote:Love the two sitting either side of Zvan. One looking at her tits and one looking at the sign.Dick Strawkins wrote:http://i.imgur.com/nXH6vAw.jpg
Give him some Billy Connolly - yes he was good, then he was a wanker, but now and again...Gefan wrote:[youtube]aZMbTFNp4wI[/youtube]
When he says he was inspired by a song while studying in the US, my first though was; "Shit. I hope it wasn't Tom Petty's Learning to Fly".
Bra-fucking-vo dude, in all sincerity.Service Dog wrote:She's a real left-winger, cause she been down south and held babies in her arms. She said, "I could tell you stories that could make you cry. What about you?"
I said, "Me too. I could tell you a story that would make you cry."
And she sighed, "Ahh."
I said, "I want to be a singer like Lou Reed."
"I like Lou Reed," she said, sticking her tongue in my ear, "Let's go, let's sit, let's talk. Politics goes so good with beer. And while we're at it, baby, why don't you tell me one of your biggest fears?"
I said, "Losing my penis to a whore with disease." "Just kidding," I said, "losing my life to a whore with disease."
She said, "Excuse me, please?"
I said, "Losing my life to a whore with disease." I said, "Please."
Well, I'm a humble guy with healthy desire. Don't give me no shit because. I've been tired.
[youtube]6ve9P3AMbaA[/youtube]
A while back I posted a link to Camile Paglia dissing Judith Butler. When they were growing-up, Butler was a "timorous, mundane, anxious" "little brown mole", who confined herself to the pretentious french section of the library-- while Paglia was engaged in total assault on the culture by any means necessary, including rock and roll, dope, and fucking in the streets. Paglia doesn't like Butler's ivory-tower post-modernism and armchair feminism-- for the same reason the American Indian Movement don't like the Washington Redskins:
Conference hopping armchair feminist PZ Myers blogged a little eulogy for aboriginal warholite Lou Reed: http://www.freezepage.com/1382942049VDBBUIHZEZJudith Butler is no radical: She is one of the smoothest careerists and veteran conference hoppers in the entire American academic system. She shrewdly adapted to the prevailing chic orthodoxy and became a major player in the ruthless academic marketplace... while the aboriginal Warholites remain ostracized.
Peezy said when he was 25 years old
There was nothin' happenin' at all
Every time he puts on a radio
There was nothin' goin' down at all, Not at all
Then one fine mornin' Peez puts on a New York station
You know, he don't believe what he heard at all
he started shakin' to that fine fine music
You know his life was saved by rock 'n' roll
Despite all the computations, you know you could just go out
And dance to the rock 'n' roll station
And baby it was alright
[youtube]PqBWi4lhqh8[/youtube]
I was born a poor, black child. I am not a bum, I'm a jerk. I once had wealth, power, and the love of a beautiful woman. Now I only have two things. My friends and my thermos. I remember the days sitting on the porch with my family singing and dancing, down in Mississippi...
"Grandma! Grandma! Look! Look at the radio! Turn it up! Turn it up! It's unbelievable! I've never heard music like this before! It speaks to me! Dad, this is unbelievable! Well if this is out there just think how much more is out there! This is the kind of music that tells me to go out there and be somebody!"
"You were left on our doorstep. But we raised you like you were one of us."
"Mother! You mean I'm going to stay this color?"
"I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass."
"Let him go, mother. Son, now that you're going out into the world, there's something you should know. You see that? That's shit. And this: shinola. Now what town are you going to try for first?
"Well I thought I'd try to go to Morris, because that is where that radio program was coming from."
"Remember, the Lord loves a working man. And son, don't never, ever trust whitey. Don't you forget to grow up now. And if you catch it, see a doctor and get rid of it."
"Don't trust whitey. See a doctor and get rid of it. Got it."
http://ak1.ostkcdn.com/images/products/ ... 992903.JPG
http://i.imgur.com/FlHApVL.jpg
This is all mildly lulzy, Service Dog, but where are you going with all this?
Well-- like PZ Myers-- I was born pretty fucking far from being a Lou Reed kinda guy. I know all about college towns on the tundra, and being surrounded by podunk Lutherans.
And then, yeah, one day I heard some Velvet Underground-- I read about Warhol in a magazine-- I saw Midnight Cowboy-- and at least I knew there was such a thing as a Downtown New York Intellectual Art Sex Drug Scene. But it seemed as distant, unobtainable and unreal... as Dr. Strange's "Sanctum Sanctorum in Greenwich Village," in Marvel Comics.
But, time went by, Alan Ginsberg and Iggy Pop were my East Village neighbors, I kissed Lou Reed in a nightclub once, twice he jaywalked without looking and a cab I was riding-in almost killed him, I got so used to Lou and Laurie as fixtures at prestigious-but-mundane art events/ that (in my head) the wrinkly little Lou Reed in a rumpled suit with whimsically-patterned socks-- wasn't even the same person as the iconic image. Along the way, I became an Aboriginal Warholian. Snorting ketamine off a tranny's silicone tits is just another day at the office. :dance:
So, yeah, PZ-- you wanna pay tribute to Lou Reed for being "subversive", and say Lou's disembodied voice on the radio was your ally against your "conventional" high school principal, fine. Cool story bro, Keep telling yourself that. What ever it takes to convince yourself you don't suck. Gabba gabba hey, you're one of us. But do you realize what an incredibly low bar that is, Peez? That's like me saying I'll count you as 'on my side' if the flesh-eating dead rise from the earth. I don't begrudge you for not being urbane, or even for pretending you are. But I do begrudge you believing your own poser bullshit so much-- that you dare lecture =anybody= on casual sex, alternatives to the heteronormative-genderbinary, free thought, freeze peach, art, diversity, culture, ...fucking life.
Did you ever actually "get a cheap Greyhound ticket and end up in a different kind of bus station in a big city on the other side of the continent", like you daydreamed about?
Measurement is THE fundamental problem with the "social sciences" and psychology. The attempt to substitute the measurement of a physical quantity (time, number, GSR etc etc) for another supposed quality is dependent on whether or not you accept that the physical quantity is a real measure of the hypothesised one. Once you have a set of measurements, you're off - maths ahoy! But until you do, you are still all about anecdotes and "subjective" "measures" (please!). At least the "feminist stats" people admit their figures are crap - not that they'd put it that way, no doubt preferring that their "adjustments" make their made up numbers "truer" than mere male numbers. though how they would know that on any empirical grounds is, let's say, obscure...Service Dog wrote:PZ Myers' October 24 blog has left me disoriented.
http://www.freezepage.com/1382885258SNJEXCCNZF
PZ mocks a chart depicting Social Market Value (or SMV), the relative sexual attractiveness of populations of humans, based on various criteria:
https://rationalmale.files.wordpress.co ... =490&h=240
I don't understand PZ's disdain for the chart's basic conclusion: that our society values women for being young and pretty, and doesn't hold men to the same standard-- allowing old, ugly men to buy desirability with money and power; thus women face a social "expiration date". How is that different from PZ's feminist beliefs?
PZ also cites individual opinions as contrary to the chart. PZ seems to think that, if one man considers Scarlett Johannson unattractive, that single data-point invalidates the chart's finding that most men consider her attractive.
I understand that the methodology used to construct the SMV chart may be specious. But it seems to me that PZ's stated objections to the methodology would also apply to vast swaths of social sciences. For example, PZ praised AronRa's Sexy Secularism presentation, which included WomanStats.org's color-coded map of the world:
http://womanstats.org/laststatics/combi ... e20113.png
AronRa claimed the map depicted the "occurrence of rape", but actually the map depicts a "Combined Scale" of the prevalence "and Sanction" of rape and sexual assault of women, "adjusted for Laws, Taboos, and rates"
How does one objectively measure "sanction" of rape? How does one "adjust" for "Laws" and "Taboos"? Should AronRa be using a chart that's "adjusted for rates" to depict rape rates? The chart's codebook reveals that "social acceptance and prevalence of pornography" is a variable used to measure "Sanction" of rape of women. Is there a legitimate positive correlation between access to porn and sanction of rape?
Much like how the Bechdel Test only measures whether a movie passes the Bechdel Test; I contend that the rape map only depicts the assumptions of its feminist makers, not the assumptions of the nations on the map. I see no difference between my objection and the objection PZ raises to the SMV chart in his follow-up post. He complains that the chart only depicts the Results of the SMV survey "and doesn't actually measure anything." http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... is-survey/
PZ also complains that the vertical axis on the SMV chart, is "dimensionless", arbitrarily broken into 10 units. How is that different from the 5 unit color scale on the rape map. Why 5? How were the cut-off points between the colors determined?
Just don't use the words "huge" or "zvanitee" and damion will probably let you live.Stunt Whisper wrote:I had a little time and I was inspired. Sorry for shitty skills.Ape+lust wrote:bovarchist wrote:Where can I find the original Zvan image?
http://i.imgur.com/7PC2p3I.jpg
Just like Sister Rae said...Service Dog wrote:She's a real left-winger, cause she been down south and held babies in her arms. She said, "I could tell you stories that could make you cry. What about you?"
I said, "Me too. I could tell you a story that would make you cry."
And she sighed, "Ahh."
I said, "I want to be a singer like Lou Reed."
"I like Lou Reed," she said, sticking her tongue in my ear, "Let's go, let's sit, let's talk. Politics goes so good with beer. And while we're at it, baby, why don't you tell me one of your biggest fears?"
I said, "Losing my penis to a whore with disease." "Just kidding," I said, "losing my life to a whore with disease."
She said, "Excuse me, please?"
I said, "Losing my life to a whore with disease." I said, "Please."
Well, I'm a humble guy with healthy desire. Don't give me no shit because. I've been tired.
[youtube]6ve9P3AMbaA[/youtube]
A while back I posted a link to Camile Paglia dissing Judith Butler. When they were growing-up, Butler was a "timorous, mundane, anxious" "little brown mole", who confined herself to the pretentious french section of the library-- while Paglia was engaged in total assault on the culture by any means necessary, including rock and roll, dope, and fucking in the streets. Paglia doesn't like Butler's ivory-tower post-modernism and armchair feminism-- for the same reason the American Indian Movement don't like the Washington Redskins:
Conference hopping armchair feminist PZ Myers blogged a little eulogy for aboriginal warholite Lou Reed: http://www.freezepage.com/1382942049VDBBUIHZEZJudith Butler is no radical: She is one of the smoothest careerists and veteran conference hoppers in the entire American academic system. She shrewdly adapted to the prevailing chic orthodoxy and became a major player in the ruthless academic marketplace... while the aboriginal Warholites remain ostracized.
Peezy said when he was 25 years old
There was nothin' happenin' at all
Every time he puts on a radio
There was nothin' goin' down at all, Not at all
Then one fine mornin' Peez puts on a New York station
You know, he don't believe what he heard at all
he started shakin' to that fine fine music
You know his life was saved by rock 'n' roll
Despite all the computations, you know you could just go out
And dance to the rock 'n' roll station
And baby it was alright
[youtube]PqBWi4lhqh8[/youtube]
I was born a poor, black child. I am not a bum, I'm a jerk. I once had wealth, power, and the love of a beautiful woman. Now I only have two things. My friends and my thermos. I remember the days sitting on the porch with my family singing and dancing, down in Mississippi...
"Grandma! Grandma! Look! Look at the radio! Turn it up! Turn it up! It's unbelievable! I've never heard music like this before! It speaks to me! Dad, this is unbelievable! Well if this is out there just think how much more is out there! This is the kind of music that tells me to go out there and be somebody!"
"You were left on our doorstep. But we raised you like you were one of us."
"Mother! You mean I'm going to stay this color?"
"I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass."
"Let him go, mother. Son, now that you're going out into the world, there's something you should know. You see that? That's shit. And this: shinola. Now what town are you going to try for first?
"Well I thought I'd try to go to Morris, because that is where that radio program was coming from."
"Remember, the Lord loves a working man. And son, don't never, ever trust whitey. Don't you forget to grow up now. And if you catch it, see a doctor and get rid of it."
"Don't trust whitey. See a doctor and get rid of it. Got it."
http://ak1.ostkcdn.com/images/products/ ... 992903.JPG
http://i.imgur.com/FlHApVL.jpg
This is all mildly lulzy, Service Dog, but where are you going with all this?
Well-- like PZ Myers-- I was born pretty fucking far from being a Lou Reed kinda guy. I know all about college towns on the tundra, and being surrounded by podunk Lutherans.
And then, yeah, one day I heard some Velvet Underground-- I read about Warhol in a magazine-- I saw Midnight Cowboy-- and at least I knew there was such a thing as a Downtown New York Intellectual Art Sex Drug Scene. But it seemed as distant, unobtainable and unreal... as Dr. Strange's "Sanctum Sanctorum in Greenwich Village," in Marvel Comics.
But, time went by, Alan Ginsberg and Iggy Pop were my East Village neighbors, I kissed Lou Reed in a nightclub once, twice he jaywalked without looking and a cab I was riding-in almost killed him, I got so used to Lou and Laurie as fixtures at prestigious-but-mundane art events/ that (in my head) the wrinkly little Lou Reed in a rumpled suit with whimsically-patterned socks-- wasn't even the same person as the iconic image. Along the way, I became an Aboriginal Warholian. Snorting ketamine off a tranny's silicone tits is just another day at the office. :dance:
So, yeah, PZ-- you wanna pay tribute to Lou Reed for being "subversive", and say Lou's disembodied voice on the radio was your ally against your "conventional" high school principal, fine. Cool story bro, Keep telling yourself that. What ever it takes to convince yourself you don't suck. Gabba gabba hey, you're one of us. But do you realize what an incredibly low bar that is, Peez? That's like me saying I'll count you as 'on my side' if the flesh-eating dead rise from the earth. I don't begrudge you for not being urbane, or even for pretending you are. But I do begrudge you believing your own poser bullshit so much-- that you dare lecture =anybody= on casual sex, alternatives to the heteronormative-genderbinary, free thought, freeze peach, art, diversity, culture, ...fucking life.
Did you ever actually "get a cheap Greyhound ticket and end up in a different kind of bus station in a big city on the other side of the continent", like you daydreamed about?
While I am completely willing to accept your satire of feminist loonies James, I just want to make sure that many extremely serious and well regarded social/psychological theories are not being overlooked in the rush to tar the obvious idiots. What humanity doesn't know about itself would fill many books, and does so every year. The wilful idiots, of course, deserve special condemnation.James Caruthers wrote:You don't understand, numbers are all patriarchal and masculinist imperialists! I started doing some math, and the number 1 was just sitting there, proudly standing erect, like a penis. It looked like it was going to rape me. And what about that computer code, huh?
10100101010100010101010010010101001010001
^LOOK AT THIS!!! You think this is just computer code? Nonsense! It's a depiction of rape! The 0s look like vaginas, and the 1s look like penises. All the computer code built by MEN is just a digital representation of the male desire to rape women! It's totally phallocentric oppression!
And what about addition? 1+0= RAPE! Again, penis raping a vagina, represented by 1 and 0. Totally oppressive. Subtraction is a little better, at least in that case, the evil patriarchal men are simulating a penis leaving a vagina, like maybe it finished raping that number 0 and now it's done. So a little better, not much.
Don't even get me started on long division, all those penises being divided into those multiple vaginas. Or multiplication, with all of those penises endlessly multiplying until the world is covered in slobbering dongs.
Numbers are patriarchy! This is why our feminist statistics must take into account not only the patriarchal cisgendered numbered representations of data points, but how those points of data make us FEEL. So if I do a poll on the number of rape victims and find the number of reported rapes is much lower in the US than in some other part of the world, I also have to factor in that I live in the US, and this makes me FEEL much more unsafe than if I were living in that place with all the oppressed minorities who have different skin color. And when I read that 90% of workplace deaths are men, that makes me FEEL pissed off at stupid MRAs for talking about TEH POOR MENZ, so I factor in my PoMo number calculations and get 11.7% workplace deaths are men, and women are so much more oppressed than men in workplace environments!
So remember sisters, always remember to factor in your PoMo feminist genderqueer numbers to counteract the skewing effect of patriarchal "facts." And stop using 1s and 0s in your math, it triggers me.
Nice piece of writing.Service Dog wrote:She's a real left-winger, cause she been down south and held babies in her arms. She said, "I could tell you stories that could make you cry. What about you?"
I said, "Me too. I could tell you a story that would make you cry."
And she sighed, "Ahh."
I said, "I want to be a singer like Lou Reed."
"I like Lou Reed," she said, sticking her tongue in my ear, "Let's go, let's sit, let's talk. Politics goes so good with beer. And while we're at it, baby, why don't you tell me one of your biggest fears?"
I said, "Losing my penis to a whore with disease." "Just kidding," I said, "losing my life to a whore with disease."
She said, "Excuse me, please?"
I said, "Losing my life to a whore with disease." I said, "Please."
Well, I'm a humble guy with healthy desire. Don't give me no shit because. I've been tired.
[youtube]6ve9P3AMbaA[/youtube]
A while back I posted a link to Camile Paglia dissing Judith Butler. When they were growing-up, Butler was a "timorous, mundane, anxious" "little brown mole", who confined herself to the pretentious french section of the library-- while Paglia was engaged in total assault on the culture by any means necessary, including rock and roll, dope, and fucking in the streets. Paglia doesn't like Butler's ivory-tower post-modernism and armchair feminism-- for the same reason the American Indian Movement don't like the Washington Redskins:
Conference hopping armchair feminist PZ Myers blogged a little eulogy for aboriginal warholite Lou Reed: http://www.freezepage.com/1382942049VDBBUIHZEZJudith Butler is no radical: She is one of the smoothest careerists and veteran conference hoppers in the entire American academic system. She shrewdly adapted to the prevailing chic orthodoxy and became a major player in the ruthless academic marketplace... while the aboriginal Warholites remain ostracized.
Peezy said when he was 25 years old
There was nothin' happenin' at all
Every time he puts on a radio
There was nothin' goin' down at all, Not at all
Then one fine mornin' Peez puts on a New York station
You know, he don't believe what he heard at all
he started shakin' to that fine fine music
You know his life was saved by rock 'n' roll
Despite all the computations, you know you could just go out
And dance to the rock 'n' roll station
And baby it was alright
[youtube]PqBWi4lhqh8[/youtube]
I was born a poor, black child. I am not a bum, I'm a jerk. I once had wealth, power, and the love of a beautiful woman. Now I only have two things. My friends and my thermos. I remember the days sitting on the porch with my family singing and dancing, down in Mississippi...
"Grandma! Grandma! Look! Look at the radio! Turn it up! Turn it up! It's unbelievable! I've never heard music like this before! It speaks to me! Dad, this is unbelievable! Well if this is out there just think how much more is out there! This is the kind of music that tells me to go out there and be somebody!"
"You were left on our doorstep. But we raised you like you were one of us."
"Mother! You mean I'm going to stay this color?"
"I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass."
"Let him go, mother. Son, now that you're going out into the world, there's something you should know. You see that? That's shit. And this: shinola. Now what town are you going to try for first?
"Well I thought I'd try to go to Morris, because that is where that radio program was coming from."
"Remember, the Lord loves a working man. And son, don't never, ever trust whitey. Don't you forget to grow up now. And if you catch it, see a doctor and get rid of it."
"Don't trust whitey. See a doctor and get rid of it. Got it."
http://ak1.ostkcdn.com/images/products/ ... 992903.JPG
http://i.imgur.com/FlHApVL.jpg
This is all mildly lulzy, Service Dog, but where are you going with all this?
Well-- like PZ Myers-- I was born pretty fucking far from being a Lou Reed kinda guy. I know all about college towns on the tundra, and being surrounded by podunk Lutherans.
And then, yeah, one day I heard some Velvet Underground-- I read about Warhol in a magazine-- I saw Midnight Cowboy-- and at least I knew there was such a thing as a Downtown New York Intellectual Art Sex Drug Scene. But it seemed as distant, unobtainable and unreal... as Dr. Strange's "Sanctum Sanctorum in Greenwich Village," in Marvel Comics.
But, time went by, Alan Ginsberg and Iggy Pop were my East Village neighbors, I kissed Lou Reed in a nightclub once, twice he jaywalked without looking and a cab I was riding-in almost killed him, I got so used to Lou and Laurie as fixtures at prestigious-but-mundane art events/ that (in my head) the wrinkly little Lou Reed in a rumpled suit with whimsically-patterned socks-- wasn't even the same person as the iconic image. Along the way, I became an Aboriginal Warholian. Snorting ketamine off a tranny's silicone tits is just another day at the office. :dance:
So, yeah, PZ-- you wanna pay tribute to Lou Reed for being "subversive", and say Lou's disembodied voice on the radio was your ally against your "conventional" high school principal, fine. Cool story bro, Keep telling yourself that. What ever it takes to convince yourself you don't suck. Gabba gabba hey, you're one of us. But do you realize what an incredibly low bar that is, Peez? That's like me saying I'll count you as 'on my side' if the flesh-eating dead rise from the earth. I don't begrudge you for not being urbane, or even for pretending you are. But I do begrudge you believing your own poser bullshit so much-- that you dare lecture =anybody= on casual sex, alternatives to the heteronormative-genderbinary, free thought, freeze peach, art, diversity, culture, ...fucking life.
Did you ever actually "get a cheap Greyhound ticket and end up in a different kind of bus station in a big city on the other side of the continent", like you daydreamed about?