Bleeding from the Bunghole

[Gumby]

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

Simple credit is fine for me. Anyone can use my stuff, it's not like it's art or I make money off it or anything.

[Southern]

While the topic of the issues in the Middle East are still warm, here's something I found on BuzzFeed.

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhance ... 565-35.jpg

If that's true, Middle West's politics must have been programmed by some douchebag with his ass firmly over the Spaggethi School of Coding. Lots and lots of GOTOs and BREAKs and deliberate uses of linked lists.

God I hate my job right now.

[Ape+lust]

So... for the billionth time I saw Rebecca ham-handedly shoehorn ELEVATORGATE into something that had fuck all to do with it. She's a farkin' one-note wonder...

http://i.imgur.com/vYAzn8b.jpg

[uberfeminist]

FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.

can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?

I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html

[Southern]

Is this "she shouldn't have hugged a guy if she didn't want to hump him" a cultural thing to Andrew69? Down there, it's expected to greet people with a hug (of course, not the same hug you would give to your Significant Other, but a hug nonethless). If a man and a woman are being introduced to each other, it's usual for them to greet each other with a mutual kiss on both cheeks (the facial cheeks, not the butt-checks, of course). No guy, however, would think that the woman was flirting with him (well, maybe if she hugs him and grab his ass...).

Care to clrify, Andrew? I hope you understand that, to most of us, it does seem like a weird proposition.

*shrug*

I doubt that anything I have to say will clarify anything. I think I am so deep into the hole right now the only thing to do is double down and keep digging.

Well, you don't need to clarify anything to me, you know. But now I'm sure you are guilty of raping the lead singer from Paramore, or maybe Avril Lavigne, I can't really tell the difference between those talentless hacks. Which one of those is married to that Canadian fucker, Chad Kroeger?

[Gumby]

Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...

what are you some kind of hug apologist?

I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.

I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg

[Southern]

Did I mention I frequently wear a kilt?

Just saying.

Pics or it didn't happend.

[Skep tickle]

FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.

can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?

I had just popped in before going to a meeting. Haven't read the Mother Jones article, & now after looking at that Zvan post I'm unclear whether MoJo was applauding, decrying, or taking some other approach to Elevatorgate's use of Storify. (Funny thing, a search of mother jones and storify brings up mother jones' own storifies (or whatever the plural of Storify is)).

So, anyway, this may be completely moot to the MoJo story, but in late 6/2013, Watson announced at Skepchick that "Point of Inquiry Team Resigns, Launches New Show with Mother Jones", source being "a press release written by Chris Mooney, Indre Viskontas, and Adam Isaak", Adam Isaak being (currently? formerly, at least) her boyfriend. The mass resignation was in protest over the whole Ron Lindsay/CFI thing that started at Women in Secularism 2 Conference. (Christina had resigned from any association including talks in protest over the CFI thing, but then later in light of Lindsay's subsequent not-pology she revoked her resignation.)

Did any of that sound at all familiar?

[Skep tickle]

FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.

can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?

I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html

Excellent. Way more useful than what I posted (at least for filling in those who didn't catch that bit of history).

[ConcentratedH2O, OM]

Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...

I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.

I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg

I'm frothing! Somebody get the children!

http://i.imgur.com/tjbvSAf.jpg

[16bitheretic]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT

[Aneris]

Part 2 of the Epic Saga is out...

http://i.imgur.com/SJS99yx.jpg

Stop by, and say hello! :)

[Lsuoma]

I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.

I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg

I'm frothing! Somebody get the children!

http://i.imgur.com/tjbvSAf.jpg

Because everyone knows children can NEVER have enough froth...

[free thoughtpolice]

[/quote][/quote]

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

Simple credit is fine for me. Anyone can use my stuff, it's not like it's art or I make money off it or anything.

Raging Bee

August 27, 2013 at 7:31 pm (UTC -5)

I’m starting to smell another David Mabus… :idea:

Leave a Reply

[Pitchguest]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

I don't get your claim from that post. Seems like Ambrosia doxxed herself first, somewhat, much as Anthony Brownian did (leading to the famous photo of him taking a selfie in a bathroom, with a cat covering his cock).

Not sure, but it could have something to do with this:

[Aneris]

You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:

I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.

Just reading the fist line and already wondering, is anyone here Richard Sanderson? I know that name from Twitter, but never seen it here.

[Guest]

I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html

Excellent. Way more useful than what I posted (at least for filling in those who didn't catch that bit of history).

Thank you both.

Chris Looney, oh yeah, has an annual feature where he publishes yet another article proving republican brains are smaller than democratic brains. Science!

[JackRayner]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

I don't get your claim from that post. Seems like Ambrosia doxxed herself first, somewhat, much as Anthony Brownian did (leading to the famous photo of him taking a selfie in a bathroom, with a cat covering his cock).

Yyyyyeah... Sorry, but a bit of a self-doxxing is what this is looking like to me... :?

Like, maybe it's just me, but I don't see the point of using a pseudo-pseudonym if I'm just going to be telling people my True Name upon request...

[Ape+lust]

[quote="free thoughtpolice"

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

[Pitchguest]

You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:

I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.

Just reading the fist line and already wondering, is anyone here Richard Sanderson? I know that name from Twitter, but never seen it here.

No, that's the thing. He's supportive of the Slymepit, but he has never actually posted here. Not once. But according to their logic, if you read it, you're a member. Which would make many of us honorary FtBers, and many FtBers honorary Slymepitters. It's a viscious circle. Or viscous, depending on how much you froth.

[Aneris]

[quote="free thoughtpolice"

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

That's very cool, perhaps we agree on the discordian Copyleft All Rights Reversed then. I was also wondering what others might do with an empty template of Pharyngulanas etc. (Pharyangulanas - Extended Universe / non-canon) or something, to distinguish it from the "official storyline". :)

[Pitchguest]

[quote="free thoughtpolice"

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

Unless they patent it, and package it, slap it on a plastic lunchbox and then *bang table* selling it, *bang* selling it.

[Cunning Punt]

I vote for the subtle one, but that might partly be because the first guy looks like his parts must be uncomfortable in those tights. If this poll had a write in category, I'd have voted for loose jogging pants with no underwear.

There's the difference between men and women for you right there. What guy is going to say, "I was going to go for the first pair of tits, but that woman looks uncomfortable in those pasties."

[Skep tickle]

Regarding the Ashley Paramore (Heathy Addict) Conference Assault. RazorBladeKandy has just posted a walk through of her video from an MRA perspective. I think it's perceptive and fair (if a bit long).

The commenters pointed out an older video by DarkMatter2525 that might illustrate the context of the event. It's a pack of the YouTube Atheists at a conference (all drunk), possibly including the principals.

[ youtube ] qesM2_z6QBE [ /youtube ]

[ youtube ] b6usE1yy5xU [ /youtube ]

Thanks for posting those. RBK's perspective (showing what Jim Bob's perspective might have been) was interesting & could have been spot-on. I thought his analysis went downhill near the end; he could have just stopped with "miscommunication" & the bit about reporting vs not reporting. (Can't wait till Zvan sees RBK's video & decides to take it apart line by line.)

I didn't make it all the way through the 2nd video, but it gives a sense of the background they might have developed in prior interactions; who knows, maybe Jim Bob left TAM 2011 with a sense of promise about future meetings that @healthyaddict hadn't intended to leave him with.

I can't relate to any of the Paramore bashing at all. She gave a detailed account of an actual sexual assault. She did not attempt to publicly shame anyone. She did not bash TAM (much the opposite in fact). She wasn't vindictive or malicious at all. Her point was merely that sexual harassment/sexual assault does happen at conferences/conference parties. Did she handle the situation with Jimbob optimally? No. But so what? Many of us handle awkward situations poorly and realize it in retrospect. That kinda has fuckall to do with anything.

I had to tap out of this video when RBK kept describing a hug as "pressing her soft breasts against him".

(Delayed response due to work)

I gritted my teeth at that part ("pressing soft breasts against him"), but I kept watching. Turns out, RBK acknowledges that some people will feel he's gone too far with that, however he chose those words on purpose in an attempt to show how Jim Bob might have experienced the encounter (the first 2/3, anyway), to show how there might have been significant but mutual miscommunication.

AP has told her side, including (as RBK points out) quite a bit about what she was thinking & feeling at the time, but it seems that the message she was conveying may have been less clear than she intended.

(As I think someone mentioned w/in the past 2 pages or so, at least one other person has said he/she was in the same room and would have been happy to help AP but apparently thought AP & JB were engaging in a mutually agreeable encounter - or at least had no idea she didn't want JB to do what he was doing.)

Not that any of that excuses a hand up the skirt to the privates without consent. But there's a shred of possibility that JB experienced the encounter in a very different way than AP and thought he was getting an invitation - or at least that his forays were not unwelcome. I'm glad she didn't name him publicly, but also note that we have not heard his side of the story. Note that if there turned out to be a significant mismatch between their experiences, recollections, & assumptions, it would not be the first time such a discrepancy had ever happened.

*ready to be pelted with ripe tomatoes*

[didymos]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

AmbrosiaX outed herself last year:

Of course, Steffy spreading it around like this is basically the same as one of the things they complain about Elevatorgate doing: bringing unwanted attention to people.

[welch]

Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925

So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)

For fuck's sake. Is that now THREE of the FfTB men who have had false rape claims made against them? How many more are going to slither out of the closet and admit they have, too. The place is a fucking den of falsely-accused non-rapists, plus a regular commenter who admitted downloading child porn, and yet they pull that Shermer shit publically, instead of through the legal system?

Cunts, cunts, cunts.

At this point, I think you need pivot tables to keep track of the FTB idiocy

[Skep tickle]

There's another 'best-of-the-slymepit' on youtube - this time by skepsheik.

[ youtube ] UcPKmEpqfhc [ /youtube ]

:clap: :clap: (especially love the song Skepsheik used, lol)

... [ youtube ] 2J2jK3QdVzQ [ /youtube ] ...

:clap: :clap: (oh ho ho, the Rolex & Popehat)

[Pitchguest]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

AmbrosiaX outed herself last year:

Of course, Steffy spreading it around like this is basically the same as one of the things they complain about Elevatorgate doing: bringing unwanted attention to people.

Ah. Then I stand corrected.

[SoylentAtheist]

Ah. Then I stand corrected.

You'll never make it at FtB.

[ConcentratedH2O, OM]

[quote="free thoughtpolice"

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

You're a gentleman.

Are you a gentleman?

[Quiz]

theamazingatheist says he knows who accused shermer.

[ConcentratedH2O, OM]

Ah. Then I stand corrected.

You'll never make it at FtB.

Hehe. Correct response:

And who the fuck are you to tell me whether I am correct or not? I've posted over three thousand misinformed, slavering comments on this website and never once have I bothered - OR BEEN ASKED - to check their truthfulness. And now you waltz in here and expect me to back up my repetitive bullshit with FACTS? Fuck you. Fuck you into the ground, and then - when you've been fucked into the ground, and all that's left exposed is a pair of buttocks - get someone to squeeze a decaying porcupine into your rectum, perhaps using a pineapple to extend the anus prior to porcupine insertion.

Oh god, yeah. Bleeding anus, rectal dilation, dead animals. Oh, fuck, I'm gonna froth right here. *Sploosh*

[JAB]

For fuck's sake. Is that now THREE of the FfTB men who have had false rape claims made against them? How many more are going to slither out of the closet and admit they have, too. The place is a fucking den of falsely-accused non-rapists, plus a regular commenter who admitted downloading child porn, and yet they pull that Shermer shit publically, instead of through the legal system?

Cunts, cunts, cunts.

Now, now... we're skeptics. We don't know they're FALSE claims.

I'm sure they're glad they could come up with alibis... it's a lot easier when you know where and when and who.

[JackRayner]

theamazingatheist says he knows who accused shermer.

For the sake of quick lulz, can you tell us around what time he makes this claim?

[Quiz]

theamazingatheist says he knows who accused shermer.

For the sake of quick lulz, can you tell us around what time he makes this claim?

14:40

[Quiz]

So I guess TJ knows this person personally.

[JackRayner]

theamazingatheist says he knows who accused shermer.

For the sake of quick lulz, can you tell us around what time he makes this claim?

14:40

Juicy.

Nice going on the heads up!

[Skep tickle]

theamazingatheist says he knows who accused shermer.

For the sake of quick lulz, can you tell us around what time he makes this claim?

14:40

14:30 - 15:20

[segue from Watson, Elevatorgate, Myers]

AVfM (Robert O'Hara): ...But now we have this issue where PZ Myers is saying that someone confided in him, telling him that the editor of Skeptic Magazine raped her.

Amazing Atheist: Yes, and it drives me crazy to know who the person is, who made that accusation, and not being able to say - for reasons of, you know, I've been sworn to secrecy.

AVfM: Oh, so this person actually exists.

AA: Yes, this is a real person,

AVfM: Okay.

AA: This is a real person who actually exists. I know who it is. Unfortunately I cannot tell you. But I can tell you that I know this person personally and they are a, um, highly dubious source for this sort of information.

AVfM: Oh, okay. So they're not credible.

AA: PZ Myers is, um...I don't know what happened to PZ Myers... [goes on about Myers]

[Ape+lust]

I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

You're a gentleman.

Are you a gentleman?

That I am. I'll have no truck with tape measures, because I am a gentleman.

[Service Dog]

http://i.imgur.com/yS3oXJj.png

Go back and watch HealthyAddict's video.
Keep an eye on her arm as she describes JimBob touching her shoulder, her back, and putting his arm around her waist.

As she speaks, she pantomimes what JimBob was doing. He was side-hugging her with one arm. She describes JimBob's single-arm side-hug as if JimBob was pushing beyond the established boundaries between-them.


Now go-back and watch the beginning of the vid, where she looms toward the camera and pantomimes her own double-arm front-hug of JimBob, when she was "thrilled" to see him.

It's clear she arbitrarily applies a double-standard in-which initiating a hug is Ok When She Does It, but is boundary-crossing when JimBob later reciprocates.

[Badger3k]

That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)

Simple credit is fine for me. Anyone can use my stuff, it's not like it's art or I make money off it or anything.

Does this mean you have no plans for a Gumbyramics line?

[AndrewV69]

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox REDACTED?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

More like WTF. Just a couple of comments:

3
Goodbye Enemy Janine

August 27, 2013 at 4:57 pm (UTC -5)

REDACTED is making the claim that the blockbot is to blame for getting noted harasser of transgendered women, Cathy Brennan, suspended from Twitter.

5
oolon

August 27, 2013 at 5:00 pm (UTC -5)

@Goodbye Enemy Janine, REDACTED used to describe herself as the “slightly delusional” defender of the #bravehero … That is an understatement given the Bug was blocked weeks ago by the majority of the users of @the_block_bot… As much as I’d like to say the bot suspended her and peed her off, given I’m on her hate site as a MRA and harasser of women, it ain’t the truth.

I am entertained.

[AndrewV69]

I for one am all in favour about you talking about penises. You make more sense than some of the people all up in arms about me honking tits.

You're the idiot who thinks that a woman shouldn't hug someone if she doesn't expect to fuck the other person.

Well, I will concede that there may be people who would not see it that way and that it is completely innocent. They would be wrong however, to assume that this is true for everyone everywhere.

We simply pointed out your idiocy.

Alas, poor Gumby.

[AndrewV69]

While the topic of the issues in the Middle East are still warm, here's something I found on BuzzFeed.

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhance ... 565-35.jpg

If that's true, Middle West's politics must have been programmed by some douchebag with his ass firmly over the Spaggethi School of Coding. Lots and lots of GOTOs and BREAKs and deliberate uses of linked lists.

God I hate my job right now.

Will this help?

TheCompleteIdiotsChartToUnderstandingTheME.jpg

(366.33 KiB) Downloaded 387 times

[AndrewV69]

Is this "she shouldn't have hugged a guy if she didn't want to hump him" a cultural thing to Andrew69? Down there, it's expected to greet people with a hug (of course, not the same hug you would give to your Significant Other, but a hug nonethless). If a man and a woman are being introduced to each other, it's usual for them to greet each other with a mutual kiss on both cheeks (the facial cheeks, not the butt-checks, of course). No guy, however, would think that the woman was flirting with him (well, maybe if she hugs him and grab his ass...).

Care to clrify, Andrew? I hope you understand that, to most of us, it does seem like a weird proposition.

*shrug*

I doubt that anything I have to say will clarify anything. I think I am so deep into the hole right now the only thing to do is double down and keep digging.

Well, you don't need to clarify anything to me, you know. But now I'm sure you are guilty of raping the lead singer from Paramore, or maybe Avril Lavigne, I can't really tell the difference between those talentless hacks. Which one of those is married to that Canadian fucker, Chad Kroeger?

You mean people listen to Canukistan singers? Someone must I suppose but I do not know who they are. Not anyone I know at any rate.

I never heard them myself and I live there. But then I do not listen to the radio and I generally ignore TV.

[Trophy]

RazorBladeKandy is a moron. And a creep as well, for getting boners from hugs.

And what, at all, do you know about owning a dick and about when it does and doesn't become erect? Or what authority do you have to decide when another person's dick should or shouldn't?

I'm not even interested in RBK's take on this, or in even taking their side. That sentence, however, is one of the stupidest things I've read all day.

I think you're the creep here....

I hate to inform you, but Trophy has a dick. It was a day of sorrow when he revealed the truth to us:( And there is even more sorrow, because he refused to provide SN with pix + ruler (in inches) :(

Damn it, I was savoring the moment before breaking in the news but now you ruined it *sigh*. And also, I'm not an imperialist, I don't do inches.

[Darren]

[AndrewV69]

Did I mention I frequently wear a kilt?

Just saying.

Pics or it didn't happend.

Your wish is my command:

DSC00827-640x640.jpg

(72.96 KiB) Downloaded 387 times

[AndrewV69]

(Delayed response due to work)

I gritted my teeth at that part ("pressing soft breasts against him"), but I kept watching. Turns out, RBK acknowledges that some people will feel he's gone too far with that, however he chose those words on purpose in an attempt to show how Jim Bob might have experienced the encounter (the first 2/3, anyway), to show how there might have been significant but mutual miscommunication.

AP has told her side, including (as RBK points out) quite a bit about what she was thinking & feeling at the time, but it seems that the message she was conveying may have been less clear than she intended.

(As I think someone mentioned w/in the past 2 pages or so, at least one other person has said he/she was in the same room and would have been happy to help AP but apparently thought AP & JB were engaging in a mutually agreeable encounter - or at least had no idea she didn't want JB to do what he was doing.)

Not that any of that excuses a hand up the skirt to the privates without consent. But there's a shred of possibility that JB experienced the encounter in a very different way than AP and thought he was getting an invitation - or at least that his forays were not unwelcome. I'm glad she didn't name him publicly, but also note that we have not heard his side of the story. Note that if there turned out to be a significant mismatch between their experiences, recollections, & assumptions, it would not be the first time such a discrepancy had ever happened.

*ready to be pelted with ripe tomatoes*

Misogyny!!!!! Rape culture!!! Enabler!!! Apologist!!!!!! Victim blamer!!!! ALWAYS LISTEN TO THE WOMEN!!!

[Trophy]

Damn, I'm feeling popular today. Must be a slow news day at the pit.

@JackRayner

Trophy is a guy. I thought he was a chick - I don't know why, maybe because he's always arguing with the MRA's here :P But yes, he is lacking tits for us to honk - unless he's built like Clarence, of course;)

I've started to consider maybe I should get offended but on the other hand, the lols are too good, they are like sweet hugs, they give me boners.

[Skep tickle]

(Delayed response due to work)

I gritted my teeth at that part ("pressing soft breasts against him"), but I kept watching. Turns out, RBK acknowledges that some people will feel he's gone too far with that, however he chose those words on purpose in an attempt to show how Jim Bob might have experienced the encounter (the first 2/3, anyway), to show how there might have been significant but mutual miscommunication.

AP has told her side, including (as RBK points out) quite a bit about what she was thinking & feeling at the time, but it seems that the message she was conveying may have been less clear than she intended.

(As I think someone mentioned w/in the past 2 pages or so, at least one other person has said he/she was in the same room and would have been happy to help AP but apparently thought AP & JB were engaging in a mutually agreeable encounter - or at least had no idea she didn't want JB to do what he was doing.)

Not that any of that excuses a hand up the skirt to the privates without consent. But there's a shred of possibility that JB experienced the encounter in a very different way than AP and thought he was getting an invitation - or at least that his forays were not unwelcome. I'm glad she didn't name him publicly, but also note that we have not heard his side of the story. Note that if there turned out to be a significant mismatch between their experiences, recollections, & assumptions, it would not be the first time such a discrepancy had ever happened.

*ready to be pelted with ripe tomatoes*

Misogyny!!!!! Rape culture!!! Enabler!!! Apologist!!!!!! Victim blamer!!!! ALWAYS LISTEN TO THE WOMEN!!!

UNLESS THOSE PARTICULAR WOMEN ARE SAYING SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T AGREE WITH YOUR SIDE - THEN DOX, EXPOSE, INSULT, OR SHAME THEM!!!!!

[Skep tickle]

(Sorry that popped out, I think I was triggered by Zvan's treatment of AmbrosiaX)

[Gefan]

Can I get a SJW side hug?

Sure. I'm not sure my arms are long enough to hug you from the front anyway.

[Gefan]

...There's another 'best-of-the-slymepit' on youtube - this time by skepsheik.

[youtube]UcPKmEpqfhc[/youtube]

Laughed out loud and brought tears to my eyes.
Steers (and Mr Clemmons) are right; "Against the storm of laughter, nothing can stand".
The baboons know this and boy, does it drive them nuts!

[Plonk]

http://i.imgur.com/vYAzn8b.jpg

:clap: This is brilliant. (And a tad disturbing.)

[AndrewV69]

http://i.imgur.com/vYAzn8b.jpg

:clap: This is brilliant. (And a tad disturbing.)

Aye. The last couple of videos were brilliant too. Which one was better I dunno, but both had me in tears. :lol:

[bovarchist]

Well, you don't need to clarify anything to me, you know. But now I'm sure you are guilty of raping the lead singer from Paramore, or maybe Avril Lavigne, I can't really tell the difference between those talentless hacks. Which one of those is married to that Canadian fucker, Chad Kroeger?

You mean people listen to Canukistan singers? Someone must I suppose but I do not know who they are. Not anyone I know at any rate.

I never heard them myself and I live there. But then I do not listen to the radio and I generally ignore TV.

Oh don't get me started on Avril Lavigne. Her fanbase has a schism to rival Slymepit/FTB. It's the epic of Bandaids vs Albaexodus.

And how can you not appreciate the raw tonnage of WTF in her latest video?

[youtube]uuNTO31FlY8[/youtube]

[Skep tickle]

All right! Greta Christina is promoting the send-A+-to-Skepticon fundraiser!
http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/ ... -and-more/

Actually, she's promoting the "Ilk" merchandise that Grimalkin designed, which is for sale at zazzle. But she mentions the A+/Skepticon fundraiser at indiegogo. However, that has resulted in zero additional donors to the indiegogo fundraiser, so far. But that's okay, because the Ilk merchandise is also to raise funds!

"Ilk" is "Greta and Jen's Ilk" meaning their horde, their commentariat. (I first saw the term used by & for the group at atheism plus forum, but totally could have missed earlier use of it at FtB since I mostly don't read there.)

There are 2 Ilk images - two "body type" silhouettes, otherwise quite similar, each standing proudly, with a single antler on its head and wearing pink jack boots. Of the larger one, it's been said by one of Greta's commenters that the silhouetted left arm looks like a "1960′s torpedo tit." But that's not all!

Quoth qmartindale at a+ forum,

One of our critics over at another forum made the point that both ilk silhouettes appear to be able bodied. Although I think they were being facetious, I think it would be neat to see other silhouettes that include other groups.

To which Grimalkin replied (and this truly did make me smile (in a nice way)):

First off.. OMG THIS GOT BIG ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE ARE CRITICIZING IT

And... *cough* yeah they're right. I will fix this.

[Skep tickle]

Oh don't get me started on Avril Lavigne. Her fanbase has a schism to rival Slymepit/FTB. It's the epic of Bandaids vs Albaexodus.

And how can you not appreciate the raw tonnage of WTF in her latest video?

[ youtube ] uuNTO31FlY8 [ /youtube ]

Hahaha...huh? That was...different.

But what an epitaph, in the middle: "No one could like their own balls quite like he could."

[AndrewV69]

OK. I finally got round to reading Avicenna.

Faux Rape Accusations and Richard Sanderson
http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... sanderson/

If you are unaware of this, I was accused of raping someone at TAM 2013 during a period of time that I was intensely busy with “work”. I didn’t know about the Michael Shermer incident. I just thought it was hate mail. Mabus was doing the rounds after all…

So I disposed of it. Tam 2013? How weird!

Then other allegations started popping up. PZ Myers, Lousy Canuck (AKA Jason Thibeault) and I realised what it was. It was laying the ground work for something big.

Turns out Mr. Sanderson is a possible suspect in the fake accusation that I raped/molested someone at TAM 2013.

WTF? Then he goes on to make this statement:

Mr. Sanderson was unaware of the alibi until mentioned. Indicating that he either learnt of the accusation from the accuser or is the accuser himself.

OK, so first Avicenna says that Sanderson is a "possible suspect" then he goes on to say that Sanderson either made the charge or learned of it by someone else.

Then he says he can not sue Sanderson. Of what I am not sure of at this point. But he appears to be confident that he would win if he did?

Then he goes on a rant about the Slymepit.

At this point I look up Sanderson on twitter and I see this:

I also see this:

Not sure what to make of this, but I suspect that someone has gone into the deep end without his water wings.

But who? :think: