If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

Tony Parsehole wrote:http://weknowmemes.com/generator/upload ... 506014.jpg

Nirvana- Moist Vagina wrote:
"She had a moist vagina
I particularly enjoyed the circumference
I'll be sucking walls of her anus
Anilingus

I prefer her to any other
Marijuana

She had a moist vagina

I preferred her to any other
Marijuana"

JackRayner wrote:So, still reading the Creative Pooping rant, and I'm at this part;

In any case, I won’t be around to watch the results.

Do I have any regrets? Sure.

[...]

I didn’t ever have a sexual experience with another person that wasn’t being raped. (By the way, I’m bi. Sorry for coming out so late, but… it would have just been sort of awkward.)
Sauce Source

Is this fellow saying he's a rapist? http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x17/ ... ferent.gif

JackRayner wrote:

Cold wrote: TL;DR version:

If a woman decides she was raped, she was raped, and you raped her. Regardless of what you or anyone else thinks because it's her body and nobody gives a shit what you think.

Exactly what the world needs; a greater demand to continue infantilizing grown ass women.

I haven't in a while, but back when I used to listen to Dan Savage's podcast on the regular, this topic is something he used to bring up on a regular basis: People often drink so that they can gain the courage to do the things that they truly want to do, and that includes women wanting to let loose and jump in bed with the first attractive guy they run into...and that's okay.

The big difference is in the size of the beer goggles, causing her to moan "Oh yes", rather than "get away from me you filthy privileged middle-aged white male!". Her actions. Influenced by the drink. Her responsibility once the "Oh yes" is out there.

But it is a function of being drunk. If she says no when she's not drunk, why should she have to be concerned about how she responds when her capacities become impaired?

socialcuntism wrote:



Sex, Death And The Meaning Of Life Episode 1 Richard Dawkins (Subs)
Dawkins explains it in better detail here but the most accepted reason some need that developed along with consciousness. Our natural drive to discover, explore, examine, when something cant be explained with the tools we have at the time we associate to the invisible. earthquake god is mad, volcano, god is hungry, eclipse, god is fucking with us. we still have but now our tool is science

another lurker wrote:VickyCaramel wrote:

I read today in the news that somebody did a study of studies and found that smart people are less likely to be religious. I don't think any of us are surprised... however I seem to remember that smart people are more likely to get sucked into cults -- probably because they can just as easily be fooled by trickery which relies on stuff like heuristics, but they *think* they are too smart to be fooled.

Somewhat tangentially related, I came across an article that was trying to answer this question: 'how can really smart people vote republican*' or somesuch:P Basically, the theory goes this way: that someone who is highly intelligent is used to being 'right' all of the time - so, when challenged on their beliefs, they will double down, instead of reconsidering their stance on certain issues :P

*no offense to the 'pit's republicans, dems can be just as stubborn over certain issues

Parody Accountant wrote:

Gumby wrote: Grunge? Really?

Oh Peez, your transparent attempt to look hip and cool to your hipster douchebag followers is transparent. If you actually listen to grunge, I'm the fucking Space Pope.

I know what song he needs:

[youtube]3rS6mZUo3fg[/youtube]

another lurker wrote:

Cunning Punt wrote:

Za-zen wrote:I'm officially done, i've been following this drama for too long. The skeptic atheist community is a joke for having entertained these morons for so long. Twatson is a self promoting talentless one trick pony (with a knack for getting people who should know better to giver her a pass, you know who i'm talking about, he most definitely fell for her cock sucking routine, yes Novella that's you, how many rumps in the sack did it take to trade your integrity?)

Myers, fuck, from this point forward i don't give a fuck if myers makes a good point, he's a fucking tool, the type of laughing idiot every town has. He's an embarrassment to intellect.

As for the assholes charged with running the skeptic atheist sphere, you muppets brought this crazy upon us, it was you who promoted these cunts, whilst it is very true, that we get the press we deserve, it is for those in positions of charge to attempt to stop the lunatics taking over the asylum, you cunts thought it was a good idea, because, popularism! It is for you i have the upmost scorn.

Dillafuckingcunty. I reserve special prejudice for you. You sir, have mastered the rhetoric well, but you never really did study the mechanics, did you. You're an apologist, not by trade by nature, for whatever position you assume at any given point in time. Your A+ fiasco most surely demonstrated that, you curtailed your criticism, and went so far as to defend the ideology which had beyond doubt been shown to you to be the insane corrupt aborted bastard child of the crazed halfwits, that it was claimed to be. All in the name of "the greater good". That says everything that is needed about you. You fail not only the final fence, you fail at intellectual honesty, that's why you'll never be more than a parrot of those greater than you.

The baboons. I despise you more than theists. There is too much to say, so i shall condense it into this singular point, the only action these self obsessed activists take is self pleasure, in whatever form presents itself.

The moron on the Jref forum who waxes lyrical about shermer propositioning his wife, you are a limp dick waif. You tell this story on a fucking forum! I bet my bottom dollar you did fuck all about it, you disgust me, you use this in an attempt to stain shermer, when the stain lays with you. Did you confront shermer about this insult to your honour, or did you mew sheepishly. You know what brother, it in actuality was in all probability nothing more than a fantasy of your wife, the fantasy of having a male who wasn't a fucking cuckold. I'd check your wife's pantie drawer, she probably hands them out as trophies to any male with a set to use them.

Epic rant.

Did you fap?

BarnOwl wrote:

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Google gelding + bean for the image I got.

Same here.

Don't stallions need to be beaned as well, or do they let it all hang out frequently enough (to masturbate, probably) that it's not a problem?

Parody Accountant wrote:

katamari Damassi wrote:Anyone want to bet that Peezus will first offer a half assed "I'm sorry you're a rapist" sort of apology?

AndrewV69 wrote:

cunt wrote:Hello retards. Just popping in to say I hope PZ gets taken to the fucking cleaners.

Be Still My Beating Heart! For the Object Of My Desire Has Appeared.

(erm ... you can ignore my email now *cough*)

Gumby wrote:

BarnOwl wrote:I think the Edina MN book-signing is just the beginning of a new line of time-wasting, non-science activities planned by PeeZus:

Grunge? Really?

Oh Peez, your transparent attempt to look hip and cool to your hipster douchebag followers is transparent. If you actually listen to grunge, I'm the fucking Space Pope.

Gumby wrote:

BarnOwl wrote:I think the Edina MN book-signing is just the beginning of a new line of time-wasting, non-science activities planned by PeeZus:

Grunge? Really?

Oh Peez, your transparent attempt to look hip and cool to your hipster douchebag followers is transparent. If you actually listen to grunge, I'm the fucking Space Pope.

socialcuntism wrote:

katamari Damassi wrote:Anyone want to bet that Peezus will first offer a half assed "I'm sorry you're a rapist" sort of apology?

Hopefully he initiates the mass suicide were all expecting.

Any one see a FTB post about cool-aid mix?

JayTeeAitch wrote:Nice bit of A+ lulz here. Setar told off for appropriation and racism by ceepolk. :D

You need to scroll down to the end where ceepolk locks the thread.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5176

Gumby wrote:

BarnOwl wrote:I think the Edina MN book-signing is just the beginning of a new line of time-wasting, non-science activities planned by PeeZus:

Grunge? Really?

Oh Peez, your transparent attempt to look hip and cool to your hipster douchebag followers is transparent. If you actually listen to grunge, I'm the fucking Space Pope.

socialcuntism wrote:

katamari Damassi wrote:Anyone want to bet that Peezus will first offer a half assed "I'm sorry you're a rapist" sort of apology?

Hopefully he initiates the mass suicide were all expecting.
Any one see a FTB post about cool-aid mix?

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Stallions too. While I've handled stallions , luckily I've never had to clean a bean on one.

bovarchist wrote:I think it's exactly the opposite...I think it's the atheists who have never been part of organized religion that I need to be more suspicious of. The ones who were born into it, but still managed to see through the bullshit and get out, are the ones who obviously have some kind of resistance to that sort of thinking.

Not that people who were raised atheist are necessarily prone to Baboonery; they just haven't really been tested.

Cunning Punt wrote:20 years since the infamous Satanic Panic of the 80's.

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/ar ... grOUaLCy81

Why do I get this feeling of deja-vu?

JackRayner wrote:

Parody Accountant wrote:

Gumby wrote: Grunge? Really?

Oh Peez, your transparent attempt to look hip and cool to your hipster douchebag followers is transparent. If you actually listen to grunge, I'm the fucking Space Pope.

I know what song he needs:

[youtube]3rS6mZUo3fg[/youtube]

:clap:

Tony Parsehole wrote:Can "Wannabe Hipster Myers" become a meme?

Skep tickle wrote: She chews Setar out.
Setar hasn't posted at A+ forum in the 4 days since xe posted the OP for this thread (though xe has been there as recently as yesterday).

:D

BarnOwl wrote:

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Google gelding + bean for the image I got.

Same here.

Don't stallions need to be beaned as well, or do they let it all hang out frequently enough (to masturbate, probably) that it's not a problem?

SkepticalCat wrote:

Skep tickle wrote: She chews Setar out.
Setar hasn't posted at A+ forum in the 4 days since xe posted the OP for this thread (though xe has been there as recently as yesterday).

:D

Maybe Setar will show up here at the slymepit, talking about how Atheism Plus are a bunch of crazy jerks....LOL :D

bovarchist wrote:

bhoytony wrote:

No, the Evil Twin always has the tache, but also a goatee. It's the law.

Not always...

http://matthewcolvin.files.wordpress.co ... man-we.jpg

katamari Damassi wrote: So, so happy to be a homo.

Skep tickle wrote:

JayTeeAitch wrote:Nice bit of A+ lulz here. Setar told off for appropriation and racism by ceepolk. :D

You need to scroll down to the end where ceepolk locks the thread.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5176

Oh, what a beautiful thread. Setar started it 4 days ago, title is "Well, there goes the neighborhood. (TW: rape, rape culture)" and first line is "Just in time for the anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the skeptical community has been hit with...well, the equivalent of nukes." That first line got hidden by SubMor as mod.

Multiple posts on page 1 with text hidden either by the post author or by mod (most by mod are for "rape culture apologia").

On page 1, Setar is criticized for bringing up Hiroshima & Nagasake (says the "massively offended" part-Japanese commenter) and for using "flaming" to describe DJ Grothe (since that's obviously a homophobic word). (Someone also disagrees with "there goes the neighborhood" in the thread title, but only because "here comes the neighborhood".)

On page 2, within 11 hrs of the opening post, ceepolk locks the thread, taking exception to the atom bomb references because so many people died, but more so to "there goes the neighborhood" because it's racist. She chews Setar out.

Setar hasn't posted at A+ forum in the 4 days since xe posted the OP for this thread (though xe has been there as recently as yesterday).

:D

Garlic wrote: Why not? You guys realize that he was in his early 30s when Sonic Youth and Nirvana made it big, right?

(Yes, it was that long ago.)

Lsuoma wrote:I was, when I lived in the UK, a licensed horse semen collector for AI purposes (or as my friends called me, the Horse Wanker). I almost never encountered beans in well looked after stallions (and, of course, I didn't collect semen from geldings).

Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, PZ Myers' wikipedia page seems to be out of date. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZ_Myers

It says (emphasis added) "Myers' first book, The Happy Atheist, will be published by Random House in August, 2013.[30]"

It, um, also seems to lack any mention of other recent notable events in his public life.

:whistle:

Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, PZ Myers' wikipedia page seems to be out of date. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZ_Myers
It says (emphasis added) "Myers' first book, The Happy Atheist, will be published by Random House in August, 2013.[30]"
It, um, also seems to lack any mention of other recent notable events in his public life.
:whistle:

Lsuoma wrote:

BarnOwl wrote:

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Google gelding + bean for the image I got.

Same here.

Don't stallions need to be beaned as well, or do they let it all hang out frequently enough (to masturbate, probably) that it's not a problem?

Lots of stallions will masturbate by rubbing themselves off on a log or fence or similar, so they are not as prone to the bean as geldings. A very rare few even have spontaneous ejaculations - it can be impressive.

I was, when I lived in the UK, a licensed horse semen collector for AI purposes (or as my friends called me, the Horse Wanker). I almost never encountered beans in well looked after stallions (and, of course, I didn't collect semen from geldings).

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby, could you critique mine?

SkepticalCat wrote:

Cunning Punt wrote:20 years since the infamous Satanic Panic of the 80's.

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/ar ... grOUaLCy81

Why do I get this feeling of deja-vu?

Funny, I made pretty much the exact same comment two days ago:

viewtopic.php?f=31&t=334&p=116329&hilit=satanic#p116329

1983: "Satanic child abusers! Evidence not needed - believe the children!!"

2013: "Rapists! Evidence not needed - believe the women!!"

Strange how it was conservative christians in 1983, and liberal atheists in 2013. I guess there's a lesson in there somewhere...

Kelly Michaels was charged with sexually abusing twenty children. Parents wearing “Believe the Children” buttons packed the courtroom for the trial. Journalists played the new daycare horror story for all it was worth. A jury convicted Michaels. She spent the next seven years of her life in prison.

The trouble was Kelly Michaels was 100% innocent.

BarnOwl wrote:

Garlic wrote: Why not? You guys realize that he was in his early 30s when Sonic Youth and Nirvana made it big, right?

(Yes, it was that long ago.)

Yeah, I'm not going to be ageist about music preferences. I like listening to all kinds of stuff, and most of the day I'm surrounded by people who are half my age.

another lurker wrote:

Skep tickle wrote:

JayTeeAitch wrote:Nice bit of A+ lulz here. Setar told off for appropriation and racism by ceepolk. :D

You need to scroll down to the end where ceepolk locks the thread.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5176

Oh, what a beautiful thread. Setar started it 4 days ago, title is "Well, there goes the neighborhood. (TW: rape, rape culture)" and first line is "Just in time for the anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the skeptical community has been hit with...well, the equivalent of nukes." That first line got hidden by SubMor as mod.

Multiple posts on page 1 with text hidden either by the post author or by mod (most by mod are for "rape culture apologia").

On page 1, Setar is criticized for bringing up Hiroshima & Nagasake (says the "massively offended" part-Japanese commenter) and for using "flaming" to describe DJ Grothe (since that's obviously a homophobic word). (Someone also disagrees with "there goes the neighborhood" in the thread title, but only because "here comes the neighborhood".)

On page 2, within 11 hrs of the opening post, ceepolk locks the thread, taking exception to the atom bomb references because so many people died, but more so to "there goes the neighborhood" because it's racist. She chews Setar out.

Setar hasn't posted at A+ forum in the 4 days since xe posted the OP for this thread (though xe has been there as recently as yesterday).

:D

mmm cannibalism

ceepolk the magnificent wrote:And Setar? the next time you decide that you're going to draw an allusion quite as offensive and appropriative as comparing the revaling of an anonymous source's story about being raped by prominent, well known, professional sceptic to the death of tens of thousands of people, 95% of them innocent women, children, elderly, and just flat out non-combatants? I don't care what you have to do to Not Do that But DON'T EVER DO THAT. EVER. That was way the fuck out of line.

Also i want to talk to you about "there goes the neighborhood." It's a vilely racist thing to say, because it's about black people having the right to move into white neghborhoods because that part of Jim Crow was struck down. "There goes the neighborhood" was a "joke" that was part of the massive system of racism that fueled "white flight" and is in many ways responsible for the still segregated neighborhoods we see to this day, and the environmental racism that fuels the school to prison pipeline. I don't care what you have to do to keep racist jokes out of your mouth, but KEEP THEM OUT OF YOUR MOUTH. That was way the fuck out of line.

bovarchist wrote:Want to see something really creepy? Look at that picture of Peezus above, now imagine him without a beard.

Gumby wrote:

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Gumby, could you critique mine?

Well, I hardly think I'm qualified, being a noob and especially seeing as how I spent all of 1.5 minutes on mine :lol: But off the top of my head, really good job getting PZ's head between the background wall and the hand holding the lighter. Head cutout is pretty rough in a couple of places, and the neck color doesn't look natural to me. Face brightness could have been toned down a bit. Gotta say though, matching skin tone is very tough, and it's always a very hit or miss thing for me.

Doesn't look like you used anti-aliasing on the head cutout, but I don't know if you even know about that so that is probably not a fair criticism. In case you don't know, anti-aliasing helps remove the "jaggies" from the edges of cutouts and blends those edges into the background to give a less cut and pasted look to a cutout. Are you using Paint.NET? If so there's an anti-aliasing addon I use that works great, I'll see if I can find the link.

Overall, a hell of a lot better job than I did when I first started doing this stuff a few months back, absolutely. You have a better command of the basics than I did when I started. :clap: If you keep doing these I predict you'll become addicted quite quickly. There's a constant urge to tweak and improve, and every shop you do will show the benefits of that obsessing. Like anything else worth doing, it takes practice.

VickyCaramel wrote:

bovarchist wrote:I think it's exactly the opposite...I think it's the atheists who have never been part of organized religion that I need to be more suspicious of. The ones who were born into it, but still managed to see through the bullshit and get out, are the ones who obviously have some kind of resistance to that sort of thinking.

Not that people who were raised atheist are necessarily prone to Baboonery; they just haven't really been tested.

It is true that religion does inoculate you against every other kind of religion. But thats only religions they inoculate you against, they still teach you faith is a virtue.

Cunning Punt wrote: Jesus H Christ, what smug self righteous asshole. God can you imagine having him over for the neighborhood barbecue?

Cunning Punt wrote:

ceepolk the magnificent wrote:And Setar? the next time you decide that you're going to draw an allusion quite as offensive and appropriative as comparing the revaling of an anonymous source's story about being raped by prominent, well known, professional sceptic to the death of tens of thousands of people, 95% of them innocent women, children, elderly, and just flat out non-combatants? I don't care what you have to do to Not Do that But DON'T EVER DO THAT. EVER. That was way the fuck out of line.

Also i want to talk to you about "there goes the neighborhood." It's a vilely racist thing to say, because it's about black people having the right to move into white neghborhoods because that part of Jim Crow was struck down. "There goes the neighborhood" was a "joke" that was part of the massive system of racism that fueled "white flight" and is in many ways responsible for the still segregated neighborhoods we see to this day, and the environmental racism that fuels the school to prison pipeline. I don't care what you have to do to keep racist jokes out of your mouth, but KEEP THEM OUT OF YOUR MOUTH. That was way the fuck out of line.

Jesus H Christ, what smug self righteous asshole. God can you imagine having him over for the neighborhood barbecue?