http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ve-equity/
Have to catch my breath from laughing. Zvan says we will know we have equity in the movement when:
Stephanie Zvan wrote:We’ll know we have gender equity when we can be as cranky as the guys. We’ll be allowed to have bad days or say something intemperate without people insisting it become and forever remain part of our official biography so everyone knows we’re not perfectly nice 100% of the time. Snapping at someone when our patience has proved not to be inexhaustible won’t be presented as a reason we should never be taken seriously again. ...
We’ll know we have gender equity when the people who speak about us are expected to treat our words, actions, and selves with the same principles of accuracy and charity that our complaints are held to or that the complaints against someone like Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris are held to. ...
We’ll know we have gender equity when our anger and our passion are put to use instead of being flinched from. The confrontationalist versus accommodationist wars will be settled in favor of the pluralism that is its destiny. We will no longer be the group to whom it’s acceptable to say, “But really, you need to spend your time and energy educating in a pleasant, non-threatening manner.†Our anger will be welcomed, validated, and channeled into productive political action, as anger is in political movements.
Oh, but when I & others challenge (angrily, passionately) their words & actions as lacking in accuracy and charity, we're the lowest excuse for human beings that ever lived. :roll:
Stephanie Zvan wrote:We’ll know we have gender equity when we have equal ownership stake in this movement we’re contributing to. We won’t be told we can’t have “their†atheism. We won’t be told that our atheist work is appropriation of atheism. Our contributions and our ability to contribute more will be weighed alongside those considerations we ask for. When someone tells us to get out, the first question asked in return will be a skeptical “What can you offer to replace her?â€
LOL, particularly since Myers and Carrier have said (in other words) that they want their version of atheism to become mainstream atheism. And I don't even understand that last line.
Stephanie Zvan wrote:We’ll know we have gender equity when our work is recognized. Those of us who write will be linked and recommended. Those of us who speak will be remembered when the time comes for invitations–and when the time comes to decide where to spend atheist convention money. Those of us in leadership positions will be consulted and mentioned when leadership openings occur. More than either of those, though, the work of volunteers won’t go unnoticed and unremarked but will be given its full value when we talk about who and what is important in our movement.
Mmmm. Anything I say in response to this would likely be seen as uncharitable.
Stephanie Zvan wrote:We’ll know we have gender equity when interference with our work is scrutinized and minimized. People who want to see this movement go forward will get angry at the constant interruption of our work. The noise of continual attacks and constant pettiness will be decried as an attack on the work of the movement. The people who wage those attacks will lose credibility instead of gaining it. Those who libel us will be the problem of all who want this movement to succeed, not just the targets of libel.
Oh, puh-leaze. If you would ignore trolls, allow discussion, and stop being self-aggrandizing, I suspect things would go much better. And if you think you're being libeled, get a lawyer, don't whinge about it on your blog.