Jim the Pleb Made Me Do It
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:24 pm
Oh no. Wow that photo could be used for chemical free pest control.
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
Oh no. Wow that photo could be used for chemical free pest control.
Yeah, and Marcotte certainly looks as though someone's tampering with her rusty tradesman's entrance...Submariner wrote:Lsuoma wrote:Jim the Pleb made me do it:
Oh no. Wow that photo could be used for chemical free pest control.
Thought about that possibility about 30 seconds after tapping "enter", but then I'm on pain killers.jimthepleb wrote:revenge WILL be mine. And subby, i was being more snarky than didactic, angostura runs through my south american veins.
While they are away i feel free to state that HOLY SHIT THAT'S A TABLE OF FUGLIES! and i have beer goggles on.codelette wrote:Are we allowed to comment on physiognomy (for the image above)? This purely from biological and anthropological perspectives...or does one still to provide with a pic and a/s/l as per Steerfuck and MKJ requirements?
Painkillers will never get you through reading Ophelia Benson's blog...i have tried...it failed.Submariner wrote:Thought about that possibility about 30 seconds after tapping "enter", but then I'm on pain killers.jimthepleb wrote:revenge WILL be mine. And subby, i was being more snarky than didactic, angostura runs through my south american veins.
http://www.fakt.pl/m/Repozytorium.Obiek ... 518120.jpgConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Marcotte is trying to make something of those girls. Unfortunately......
http://i.imgur.com/nXNLGim.jpg
Try dilautin.jimthepleb wrote:Painkillers will never get you through reading Ophelia Benson's blog...i have tried...it failed.Submariner wrote:Thought about that possibility about 30 seconds after tapping "enter", but then I'm on pain killers.jimthepleb wrote:revenge WILL be mine. And subby, i was being more snarky than didactic, angostura runs through my south american veins.
Where's the fuckin trigger warning?
Oh look in the background they have the Huge Black Cock of Authority :o
[youtube]RP13_g54-Lc[/youtube]
Yeah, I was working on inverting that but I'm too lazy (and toasted right now).jimthepleb wrote:Lsuoma wrote:Jim the Pleb made me do it:
Oh look in the background they have the Huge Black Cock of Authority :o
Good question PZ.The one thing I’m happy to do is publicize these dumbass arguments. Why is it that people who attach themselves to a movement that prides itself on having rationality as its raison d’etre are so godawful pathetic at making a case for themselves?
Also,justinvacula wrote:PZ's new piece "I am so over the skeptical movement" (good, see your own way out, PZ!):
Good question PZ.The one thing I’m happy to do is publicize these dumbass arguments. Why is it that people who attach themselves to a movement that prides itself on having rationality as its raison d’etre are so godawful pathetic at making a case for themselves?
I may be mistaken, but isn't this the first time she's even really talked about it since TAM?I’m so over Harriet Hall’s t-shirt. She’s been going on and on, circling around the drain to somehow defend it.
Yes, because as everyone knows, if you're white and male you don't really have to have a valid argument. Everyone just accepts your word as gospel. Isn't that right William Lane Craig?
You know, I'll take Dr. Col. Hall any day of the week against PeeZus. Debating, accomplishments, and probably in a cage match too.lonesagi wrote:Also,justinvacula wrote:PZ's new piece "I am so over the skeptical movement" (good, see your own way out, PZ!):
Good question PZ.The one thing I’m happy to do is publicize these dumbass arguments. Why is it that people who attach themselves to a movement that prides itself on having rationality as its raison d’etre are so godawful pathetic at making a case for themselves?
I may be mistaken, but isn't this the first time she's even really talked about it since TAM?I’m so over Harriet Hall’s t-shirt. She’s been going on and on, circling around the drain to somehow defend it.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -movement/
http://www.freezepage.com/1361594300JKHUOWVEFR
Unless I'm very much mistaken, the ONLY people who have raised the subject since TAM 2012 are the crapchicks and their mangina friends.lonesagi wrote: I may be mistaken, but isn't this the first time she's even really talked about it since TAM?
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... -movement/
http://www.freezepage.com/1361594300JKHUOWVEFR
You, sir, have no decency.
So, in the picture I recognize Trigger, Twatson, Marmaladecotte, and reGreta. Who else is there?
Wanking off a hobo?CommanderTuvok wrote:What is McWrong doing with her right hand?
He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.It’s true. If I did have an editor for the blog, they’d have a nervous breakdown and collapse in the first day. Either that or they’d only allow me to post one thoroughly vetted sentence a week.
Tact isn't exactly one of Peezus' strong points. Or etiquette. Or empathy.rocko2466 wrote:Yes. We are all triggered by that photograph, but moving on...
PZ posts about his book: http://www.freezepage.com/1361597432WEFVOZWZCH
and then says, about his blog:
He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.It’s true. If I did have an editor for the blog, they’d have a nervous breakdown and collapse in the first day. Either that or they’d only allow me to post one thoroughly vetted sentence a week.
I declare his new name as Poe Z Myers.
Meanwhile, the song on my Youtube channel tomorrow (Sunday) may address people's speculation about the preparation for advertising that book...
(mathbabe does not cite her source, and I have no way of knowing how true it is or not, but I would be surprised if what the article documents was completely unknown to the attendees of the no-confidence).An anonymous person got a bunch of copies of the II article and stuck one in every Harvard faculty’s mailbox the morning of the no-confidence vote that got Summers ousted.
In any event, there was trouble elsewhere, going back as far as 2002 according to TPMuckraker, in this entry dated Apr 1, 2009 (note after the events of 2008)economics professor Andrei Shleifer, who in the mid-1990s led a Harvard advisory program in Russia that collapsed in disgrace. In August, after years of litigation, Harvard, Shleifer and others agreed to pay at least $31 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the U.S. government. Harvard had been charged with breach of contract, Shleifer and an associate, Jonathan Hay, with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government
But Wait! There is more!The episode dates back to 2002, when analyst Iris Mack, whose website identifies her as the second African American woman to earn a Harvard PhD. in applied math (and someone who likes primary colors) joined the much-venerated Harvard Management Company, which invests the university’s then $18 billion endowment, to find what she termed a “frightening†state of affairs.
I AndrewV69, the merciful, the compassionate will confine myself to just those two examples above, of the rather interesting attitude that Summers appears to have had, about managing sums of money, that strictly speaking did not belong to him. You are invited to GoogleFu yourself if you desire more.Summers, amazingly, wanted to invest 100% of the university’s cash in the endowment, and had to be talked down to investing a mere 80%. No wonder Meyer and El-Erian tried to talk him out of it: the Harvard endowment was never designed as a place to invest sums of cash which might be needed immediately. Instead, it’s designed to invest for the very long term, taking advantage of the higher returns on illiquid investments.
Summers was playing a high-risk carry-trade game with Harvard’s cash
Now the Slate article was a bit more "balanced" and "nuanced" in my view and even went so far as to slap Summers around somewhat, but still managed to preserve the narrative. This was again back in 2005. At this point however, I am going to contradict myself and suggest you just read the quote. But hay! It is your time. Do with it as you will.It is ironic that while shouting down any hint that men might be more capable than women in mathematics, many so-called "difference feminists" have long contended that women are morally superior to and more caring than men. This, says Daphne Patai, a former professor of women's studies at the University of Massachusetts (Amherst), illustrates "the opportunism, inconsistency, and double standards that abound in contemporary feminism, often feebly justified by attacks on logic and reason as 'masculinist.'"
Boston civil-liberties lawyer Harvey A. Silverglate placed this episode in its larger context in a piece in the Boston Phoenix:
"The modern university is the culmination of a 20-year trend of irrationalism marked by an increasingly totalitarian approach to highly politicized issues. Students are subjected to mandatory gender-and racial-sensitivity training akin to thought reform.... Faculty members and administrators are made to understand that their careers are at risk if they deviate from the accepted viewpoint."
So we come to the end. Was it the money, and/or the Feminists or some combination of both? You decide. I am going to go with the money as the factor that had the largest influence.In short, Summers got a bum rap. So, was his analysis of biological and cultural factors sound? The transcript answers that question, too. The answer is no. Summers grossly overreached the evidence, and he made a couple of glaring logical blunders.
Sigh..another stupid fuck who assumes they know anything about me.....PZ should call his blog Psychingula cause him and his commneters think they can read minds and know the details of another person's life. morons
:icon-lol:
Meh, I just like to give you a good ribbing and/or take the piss more than anything... although you do have an unhealthy fascination with "methinks" and use it way too fucking much.Steersman wrote::icon-lol:
That has to qualify as a classic left-handed compliment – thanks, I think.
Though to be fair to Andrew, his posts, I think, have a fair amount of meat to them, just that they frequently require more time and effort to parse than I, at least, frequently have time for ….
Brilliant. I concur.Michael K Gray wrote:The very reason to not invite Andrew to be one's best man:
(Pat of a Mitchell & Webb Youtube clip)
Wait... where and what? Did this actually happen?rocko2466 wrote:He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.
Check her Twitter feed around the 17th and after. More than 3 days, but that's the gist. It was brought up on the pit and 'capped but I'm too drunk to find it.franc wrote:Wait... where and what? Did this actually happen?rocko2466 wrote:He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.
Take a look at this post from ~5 days ago (& the multiple nested quotes there including a MH tweet and several pitter comments; also see some of the posts upstream & downstream from it): http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... 317#p65317franc wrote:Wait... where and what? Did this actually happen?rocko2466 wrote:He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.
I guess I’ll have to embark on a 12 step program to curtail my use of the word – methinks ….lonesagi wrote:Meh, I just like to give you a good ribbing and/or take the piss more than anything... although you do have an unhealthy fascination with "methinks" and use it way too fucking much.Steersman wrote::icon-lol:lonesagi wrote:Steers, I owe you an apology. You are obviously not the most tedious, verbose poster on the 'pit.AndrewV69 wrote:In other news,
Blah blah blah.
<snip>
That has to qualify as a classic left-handed compliment – thanks, I think.
Though to be fair to Andrew, his posts, I think, have a fair amount of meat to them, just that they frequently require more time and effort to parse than I, at least, frequently have time for ….
Youthinks? :whistle:Steersman wrote:I guess I’ll have to embark on a 12 step program to curtail my use of the word – methinks ….lonesagi wrote:Meh, I just like to give you a good ribbing and/or take the piss more than anything... although you do have an unhealthy fascination with "methinks" and use it way too fucking much.Steersman wrote::icon-lol:lonesagi wrote:Steers, I owe you an apology. You are obviously not the most tedious, verbose poster on the 'pit.AndrewV69 wrote:In other news,
Blah blah blah.
<snip>
That has to qualify as a classic left-handed compliment – thanks, I think.
Though to be fair to Andrew, his posts, I think, have a fair amount of meat to them, just that they frequently require more time and effort to parse than I, at least, frequently have time for ….
If you did that, I wouldn't have as much of a reason to talk shit about you....This would make me a sad ratkin (see Pitglyphs).Steersman wrote:I guess I’ll have to embark on a 12 step program to curtail my use of the word – methinks ….lonesagi wrote:Meh, I just like to give you a good ribbing and/or take the piss more than anything... although you do have an unhealthy fascination with "methinks" and use it way too fucking much.Steersman wrote::icon-lol:lonesagi wrote:Steers, I owe you an apology. You are obviously not the most tedious, verbose poster on the 'pit.AndrewV69 wrote:In other news,
Blah blah blah.
<snip>
That has to qualify as a classic left-handed compliment – thanks, I think.
Though to be fair to Andrew, his posts, I think, have a fair amount of meat to them, just that they frequently require more time and effort to parse than I, at least, frequently have time for ….
Norah Vincent did try living like a man for 18 months. She is not straight though, so she did wind up going out on dates with women while posing as a man.decius wrote: And which straight "cis" person would even contemplate the possibility of gender-surfing?
Book here:She continued her emotional descent, and a week later, checked in to a hospital with severe depression. Identity, she concluded, was not something to play around with.
"When you mess around with that, you really mess around with something that you need that helps you to function. And I found out that gender lives in your brain and is something much more than costume. And I really learned that the hard way," she said.
!!! :shock: :) :Drayshul, commenting on ZJ's suggestion that people try opposite-sex hormones, wrote:Theoretically I'd be interested in that - I'm pretty sure my gender's not important to me in the slightest, but I doubt I'd want to be a man because a) I'm 100% certain that women get a better deal out of life in virtually every way and b) I'd be a *short* man, and I just don't think I could accept that. (I'm also a leetle worried because I'm fairly aggressive and swear a lot, and I realise my gender probably lets me get away with a fuck load of behaviour that would not be considered "socially appropriate" from a man.) Of course currently pregnant with twins so it's not like I could do any hormone shit. But I'd be interested in an experiment if one was ever done that involved that sort of thing.
Same here. I notice Lsuoma hasn't registered the complaints of the intelligence-impaired posters (me).Metalogic42 wrote:Once again, I didn't realize the previous topic was locked. Go me!
Periodically. Although not everyone happens to agree always with the conclusions I reach ….Skep tickle wrote:Youthinks? :whistle:Steersman wrote: <snip>
I guess I’ll have to embark on a 12 step program to curtail my use of the word – methinks ….
It is without question¹ that Hensley is a champion word-wrangler, and official opinion-curator-in-chief of CFI², therefore her input, (even if minimal), could only have improved PZ's thumbnail scratchings.lonesagi wrote:Check her Twitter feed around the 17th and after. More than 3 days, but that's the gist. It was brought up on the pit and 'capped but I'm too drunk to find it.franc wrote:Wait... where and what? Did this actually happen?rocko2466 wrote:He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.
The court of trial by internet is due to consider the case next Tuesday, at 10am, convening in the Twitter Room.It is rare that we see cases like this, other than with the classic case that everyone remembers of the criminal "Mandongo" novel, by Greg Laden, which made not only the publishers, but also the readers consider suicide as an option.
Ta (and Skep Tickle too). Yes, saw all that. Didn't register she actually went to ER. Just seemed so normal - they're all painkiller and therapist addicted. Had a millisecond of concern with last blog piece that it might tip her over the edge - but only a millisecond. Face it, it's her conscience that's really eating her - not anything I or anyone else may say. Self-inflicted as far as I am concerned. Fuck her. She's even made Becky look just a shade less repugnant.lonesagi wrote:Check her Twitter feed around the 17th and after. More than 3 days, but that's the gist. It was brought up on the pit and 'capped but I'm too drunk to find it.franc wrote:Wait... where and what? Did this actually happen?rocko2466 wrote:He says this three fucking days after Melody Hensley - who helped him edit his fucking book - had a fucking breakdown on Twitter and had her boyfriend take her to the ER.
Ta. This place has become an overwhelming time-eater. Either read all or read nothing. Massive attack of gretachristinitis for the last month. Decided to squeeze out a couple of articles with time windows instead.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Glad to see you back, Franc.
Only a very select few perverts wish to be in the position where they are able to view franc's back.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Glad to see you back, Franc.
I said "you", not "your". But I can see where it would be confusing to some.Michael K Gray wrote:Only a very select few perverts wish to be in the position where they are able to view franc's back.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Glad to see you back, Franc.
Like magnets.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I said "you", not "your". But I can see where it would be confusing to some.Michael K Gray wrote:Only a very select few perverts wish to be in the position where they are able to view franc's back.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Glad to see you back, Franc.
Fucking aspies, how do they work?
